Hello,
I'm trying to properly setup a database for re-occuring Inventory Counts, or cycle counts as some call them.
I have a table listing all of the counts, and another table to shows their cycle, i.e. Count1 happens only on Monday and Tuesday, Count2 happens on the 2nd, 15th and 27th day of the month. Once I start recording data for the actual count want to relate that date to a specific occurance of this count, and not to the schedule. In my mind I would create another table that holds the actual counts, seperate from their schedules. My issues is keeping everyting in check, I'm sure there is a proper way of doing it. A good example is Microsoft Outlook and how you can set up re-occuring events or meetings, then you can change one or all of them. That's the type of database structure I'm looking.
If someone can give me any hints or point me to some good reading material that would be great.
Thanks,
This may be a long post so bare with me. I posted a few weeks ago with a SQL issue involving Backup Exec. Long story short I wiped out all SQL on my server and reinstalled Backup exec. It was running fine for about a week and this morning I came in and I can't start the console becasue the services are stopped. I can't start any of them and it is giving me the same errors as before I reloaded. It is a fresh copy of Backup Exec 11d which loads a SQL Express it says. I wiped everything out before the install becasue this is the only thing using sql, after I loaded BE back on I now have in my add/remove programs Micosoft SQL Server 2005, Microsoft SQL Server Native Client, Microsoft SQL Server Setup Support Files, Microsoft SQL Server VSS Writer and also I have MSXML 4.0 SP2 and MSXML 4.0 SP2 Parser/SDK and MSXML 6.0. I had a one time shot with symantec and thats when we reloaded BE and he told me that BE has something to do with MSXML. So this morning I had this in my event viewer Event ID 1000 Faulting application sqlservr.exe, version 2005.90.2047.0, faulting module kernel32.dll, version 5.2.3790.2756, fault address 0x00015e02.
I can't start SQL Server (BKUPEXEC) or SQL Server Browser in my services as they give me the error 1053 The service did not respond to the start or control request in a timely fashion.
What am I doing wrong why did the service just quit in the middle of the night for no reason after working great for a week or so? Is this more of a symantec issue? Thanks for all the help.
Hello experts. I have been searching for anything about this but found very little. What are the events logged in SQL Server Error Logs aside from Successful/Failed Login, Backup/Restore/Recover database and, start/init sql server? Can we configure this to log other events, like CREATE or DBCC events for example? If so, how? Thanks a lot.
My SQL 2000 server has restarted 12 times since February 29, before then it was pretty stable. The server is an older one and basically it just runs SQL 2000 for three databases, only one of which is busy, but the server as a whole is not overloaded. Operations took the server down last week and ran hardware diagnostics €“ no hardware issues were found. I€™ve checked the system, security and applications logs €“ there are no indications of errors prior to the system restarting. I€™ve checked the SQL logs and there is no pattern to what is running on SQL right before the restarts and there doesn€™t appear to be any correlation between when the server restarts and when SQL jobs, replication agents, DTS packages or database maintenance runs. There are 14 hotfixes which have been applied to the server since January; I€™ve searched Microsoft€™s web site and google for any reported issues with these hotfixes, but haven€™t found any issues reported with them and SQL; I€™d appreciate any assistance in resolving this, thank you.
IBM x-Series 345, dual Xeon 2.00GHz, 2.50 GB RAM Windows Server 2003 Standard Edition, SP1 Microsoft SQL 2000 SP3 8.00.760
1/22/2008 Windows Server 2003 Hotfix KB941202 1/22/2008 Windows Server 2003 Hotfix KB939653 1/22/2008 Windows Server 2003 Hotfix KB943460 1/29/2008 Windows Server 2003 Hotfix KB930045-v5 2/11/2008 Windows Server 2003 Hotfix KB933729 2/21/2008 Windows Server 2003 Hotfix KB941568 2/21/2008 Windows Server 2003 Hotfix KB944653 2/21/2008 Windows Server 2003 Hotfix KB941569 2/21/2008 Windows Server 2003 Hotfix KB942615 2/21/2008 Windows Server 2003 Hotfix KB941644 2/21/2008 Windows Server 2003 Hotfix KB943485 3/14/2008 Windows Server 2003 Hotfix KB946026 3/14/2008 Windows Server 2003 Hotfix KB943055 3/14/2008 Windows Server 2003 Hotfix KB944533
Hiwe are considering porting an application from Ingres to SQL Server.Part of the application uses a feature of Ingres called databaseevents. These allow a application to monitor for an event happening inthe database, e.g. a user enters a record meeting certain conditions,the database raises an event including a record ID, and a clientapplication sees the event (without continual explicit polling), readsthe new record and starts processing it.Any idea what the equivalent functionality would be in SQL Server2000, or are applications simply not done that way?TIAChloe CrowderThe British Library
Greetings, I have a requirement for a SQL Server 2005 database to notify 3rd Party applications of a table change. As is stands now, 3rd Party applications access the database via a Data Access Layer (DAL) dll (C#). I'd like to somehow implement an asychronous event notification scheme via the same DAL to these clients.
Can someone offer a clever way to implement such events?
Broker Services? I am under the impression the SSBS is typically deployed when databases are to communicate with one another.
I am trying to find out where is the maintenance plan which is backing up SQL Dbs on its own at 12 am daily where as we didn't scheduled maintenance plans at all. We see I/o frozen and resume events every day in event l/o
Log Name:Â Â Â Â Â Application Source:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â MSSQL$MSSQLSERVER2K8 Date:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 5/4/2015 12:00:23 AM Event ID:Â Â Â Â Â 3198 Task Category: Server Level:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Information Keywords:Â Â Â Â Â Classic
Ok, I'm doing a football database for fixtures and stuff. The problem I am having is that in a fixture, there is both a home, and an away team. The tables as a result are something like this:
It's not exactly like that, but you get the point. The question is, can I do a fixture query which results in one record per fixture, showing both teams details. The first in a hometeam field and the second in an away team field.
Fixture contains the details about the fixture like date and fixture id and has it been played
Team contains team info like team id, name, associated graphic
TeamFixture is the table which links the fixture to it's home and away team.
TeamFixture exists to prevent a many to many type relationship.
Make sense? Sorry if this turns out to be really easy, just can't get my head around it at the mo!
I actually work in an organisation and we have to find a solution about the data consistancy in the database. our partners use to send details to the organisation and inserted directly in the database, so we want to create a new database as a buffer database to insert informations from the partners then make an update to the main database. is there a better solution instead of that?
Hello everyone,I have a webcontrol that uses database-structures alot, it uses the system tables in SQL to read column information from tables. To ease the load of the SQL server I have a property that stores this information in a cache and everything works fine.I am doing some research to find if there are anyway to get information from the SQL server that the structure from a table has changed.I want to know if a column or table has changed any values, like datatype, name, properties, etc.Any suggestions out there ?!
I have a system that basically stores a database within a database (I'msure lots have you have done this before in some form or another).At the end of the day, I'm storing the actual data generically in acolumn of type nvarchar(4000), but I want to add support for unlimitedtext. I want to do this in a smart fashion. Right now I am leaningtowards putting 2 nullable Value fields:ValueLong ntext nullableValueShort nvarchar(4000) nullableand dynamically storing the info in one or the other depending on thesize. ASP.NET does this exact very thing in it's Session State model;look at the ASPStateTempSessions table. This table has both aSessionItemShort of type varbinary (7000) and a SessionItemLong of typeImage.My question is, is it better to user varbinary (7000) and Image? I'mthinking maybe I should go down this path, simply because ASP.NET does,but I don't really know why. Does anyone know what would be the benifitof using varbinary and Image datatypes? If it's just to allow saving ofbinary data, then I don't really need that right now (and I don't thinkASP.NET does either). Are there any other reasons?thanks,dave
Hi All,Can u please suggest me some books for relational database design ordatabase modelling(Knowledgeable yet simple) i.e. from which we couldlearn database relationships(one to many,many to oneetc.....),building ER diagrams,proper usage of ER diagrams in ourdatabase(Primary key foreign key relations),designing smallmodules,relating tables and everything that relates about databasedesign....Coz I think database design is the crucial part of databaseand we must know the design part very first before starting up withdatabases.....Thanks and very grateful to all of you....Vikas
I would like to AUTOMATICALLY count the event for the month BEFORE today
and
count the events remaining in the month (including those for today).
I can count the events remaining in the month manually with this query (today being March 20):
SELECT Count(EventID) AS [Left for Month], FROM RECalendar WHERE (EventTimeBegin >= DATEADD(DAY, 1, (CONVERT(char(10), GETDATE(), 101))) AND EventTimeBegin < DATEADD(DAY, 12, (CONVERT(char(10), GETDATE(), 101))))
Could anyone provide me with the correct syntax to count the events for the current month before today
and
to count the events remaining in the month, including today.
Hi All, I am designing database where few of the master tables will reside in different database or in case different server. Scenario is Server "A" with Database "A" may host the "Accounts" table. Server "B" with Database "B" may host the "Product" table. I am designing database "Project" which will hosted in Server "A". My application requires this master tables [readonly access] as data inserted in my application refers this tables. Also there are reports to be generated which refer this tables. How do i design my database and sql queries? I am thinking of approach of having equivalent tables created in my database and writing service which keep tables in my database in sync. This will ensure good perfomance during transaction and reports as they will need to refer this table locally as opposed to different database or different server.
Any thoughts on above approach?? or any better/standard way for such scenarios ?
Thanks in Advance. Your inputs will be of great help.
Online US Searchable Map of the 50 US States. Users search criteria is the following: Query records by selecting state, county, then record. Each County table has 10-20 tables. All databases combined = 500MB and TLogs = 100MB.
How would you re-design a relational DB where users could query data by state-county-record. Currenty the DB's are created by the County of each state which creates hundreds of DB's in SQLServer with no realtionship to each US state. What would be the best design to ensure good performance, data integrity and maintenance? Would you create 1 DB with all 50 states, create 4 DB's and divide by region(N,S,E,W), 50 DB's of each state or leave it as is with each county it's on DB? Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Hello, I am designing my first database with 5 tables for a demo project and am not sure if it works. an example below.2 of the many things I want visitors to the site to do is find a company by the industry sector they belong to,..andwhat sort of service or products they can supply. For instance a Employment agency maybe under professional services Table 1 Customer Customer_ID = primary key,,,, Sector_ID = Foreign keyComapany Name, Address, Phone, Postcode etcTabel 2 Industry SectorsSector_ID = primary key,,,,Customer_ID= foreign key banking, Education,Prof Services, etc Table 3 Trading ActivityTrading_ID = primary key,,,,Sector_ID = Foreign key, Products_ID= FkEmployment Agent, School, Lawyer etcTable 4 ProductsProducts_ID = primary key,,,,Trading_ID = foreign keySupply frozen foods, transport services, sports goods, etc Table 5 Account Account_ID = primary key,,,,Customer_ID = foreign keyAccount Name, Credit Limit, Payment Terms, Open date, Account contact etc One big point of confusion is, can I have the Customer_ID from the principal Customers tablein every table as a foreign key or must the tables be chained together one after the other as such. Advice appreciatedThanks
Hi, I need a hand with designing a database. I am collecting results from a survey which has the following questions: Call ref? How did you place your support call? Were you satisfied with the amount of time you had to wait until getting acknowledgement of the support call placed? 1 = very satisfied and 10 = very unsatisfied. How happy were you with the customer service you received upon placing the support call? 1 = very unhappy and 10 = very happy.How satisfied were you with the amount of time you had to wait until you heard from an engineer? 1 = very satisfied and 10 = very unsatisfied. How satisfied were you with the time taken to get your problem/query resolved? 1 = very satisfied and 10 = very unsatisfied Did you feel the engineer had enough knowledge to deal with your call? 1 = very good and 10 = not very good Overall how satisfied were you with the support call placed? 1 = very satisfied and 10 = very unsatisfiedIs there anything we can do to improve the quality of the support and service you received? I want to store this in a database. Obviously I want to use best practice for design, normalisation etc. The stumbling block I am coming accross is the fact that each question has a number and each question has a score from 1 to 10 and storing this in the database. Any help appreciated! Thanks Andrew
I am creating database tables for company testimonials. Database columns: name, position, companyname, comment, service we provided. My question is that for each company - may have a multitude of different services from us, and different people with different positions in the same company may make comments. What is best practice for putting this db structure together? Thanks Andrew
Can anyone tell me how can i design database architecture for the Table Category & Product...so that i can make N-level entity relation....I have database in SQL SERVER 2000.
I guess I am confused about something and need some help. I am looking at a database schema for about 20 tables in a database. I noticed that the firstcolumn in each table Is some type of Id. For example StudentId,TestId etc.Where the Id is a unique numeric sequential value. So I have some questions?1- Do these Id's act as what are called indexes for the table?(Unique indexes)2- If the answer to 1 is correct, then how do I create these unique indexes? Is it as simple as declaring the Id column as the primary key and that this value will be generated automatically upon insert? 3- Is it necessary to have an Id column for every table, or may I only do it for a few of them?4. In relation to Question2, what do I need to do, so that the Id column will automatically be created when someone inserts a value into the database table with an ID column. For example here are two sample tables StudentsInfo StudentId<PK> Name Age 1 Mark 33 2 Jill 23 3 Mary 25 PersonalInfo Name<FK> SocialSecurity Address MajorMark 324-444-3342 15 Elm ArtJill 888-888-8998 21 North ScienceMary 876-777-2344 18 Byle Music
Hi,I am planning to create a technical forum for our college. could any one give me an idea of how to design the database for the forum. what table and columns i should have?
I have got a design issue.I have got 4 tables,having relationships.Now,user will edit records and save them,but I want to save the values which were exixsting before they were edited and saved.Implying,if a record is edited 50 times,then the values of each edit needs to be saved.How best ,can I achieve this.
Hi !!We are designing a system where we ask people for their interests and store in into the database and send customize email. Following are the questions:1) Should we use Identity column as Primary Key and CustomerID column? OR we should create Custom CustomerID and use it as Primary Key? (I have read few articles about Identity column as Primary or not Primary, but need little advice what to accept)2) We have a Tables called : Interest & Customer_InterestCustomer Table:CustomerID, Customer Name, Address, Email, Signup DateInterest Table:InterestID, InterestNameCustomer_Interest: (Need suggestion for How to design this)Should Table be design like:Option1: CustomerID, InterestIDOption2: CustomerID, Interest1, Interest2, Interest3, Interest4i.e.Lets Say: Customer table has CustomerA, CustomerB, CustomerCInterest table has Interest I1, I2, I3, I4Lets Say CustomerA Signedup for Interest I1, I2, I3 and CustomerB signed up I1, I4As per Option1:Customer_Interest Table witll haveCustomerA, I1CustomerA, I2CustomerA, I3CustomerB, I1CustomerB, I4ORAs per Option2Customer_Interest (Where Interest Column is bit column..... 1 = Signed up, 0 = Not Signed upCustomerA, 1, 1, 1, 0CustomerB, 1, 0, 0, 1Which way we should design? 3) If we select Option2, and if we are displaying data in ASP.NET Page, will there be any issue if we use 3 tier architecture?Thanks !!!
I am designing an inventory database in which I need some help, I have the following entities:ItemsNotebookWireless CardADSL Modemetc...ModelsAcer centrino 1.6Acer centrino 1.733COM 4x125 hours Wi-fi access50 hours Wi-fi accessetc... PackagesPackage A:Acer centrino 1.63COM 4x125 hours Wi-fi accessPackage B:Acer centrino 1.733COM 4x150 hours Wi-fi accessI made a table for the items having the following fields: Item_ID, Item_Nameand another for the Models having: Model_ID, Model_Name, Item_Type(Foreign Key to Items table)up to this point is this correct?About the packages table, I don't know if it is correct to have a field for each model (one for notebook, other for modem, and other for wireless card) like this it would be like having 3 foreign keys to the same table but nothing distinguishes themI don't know how to relate the packages and the models table.Any recommendations for a proper design for those entities?
I am creating a knowledge base. I want the user to be able to choose a category such as Hardware, Software, Etc. then I want them to be able to choose what type of software such as word, excel, ets. It will then display in a gridview problems, solutions, submitted by, last updated, and review date. The gridview will allow users to update solutions and I would also like the ability for technicians to be able to add new Problems/solutions.
I have requirement to create table of 100 columns. Should i create 100 columns in one table or i should create three coulmn table with column id, column desc, column value with 1 row in 100 column table = 100 row in 3 column table. Which will be faster & efficient in performance, io & size.
The database will provide content management for an Intranet site.
On the site we have a number of articles which are categorised. Each categories can also have sub-categories.
The relationships would seem to be
Category---->Sub-Category----->Article
A category has one or mant sub-categories. A sub-category has one or many articles.
However some categories have articles but are no sub-categories.
Should I create a further relationship between Category and Article to cater for this instance or should their be a dummy category record in this instance?
I am designing a sql server database to keep track of patient history and data about various diseases. Is there a book or any kind of resource that I can refer? Any help is appreciated.
I had a consultant design a database for me and every table contains a GUID. Most tables already contain a field that is unique. Is this necessary? In my view, the queries are no more efficient and it just takes up more space.
