Hi,
I have written a master proc which calls another proc (say proc1).
This proc1 has insert-exec statements, for eg insert into #temp exec proc1.
i.e. multiple times the proc would be nested.
This the err thrown :
An INSERT EXEC statement cannot be nested.
Is it possible to resolve it..
I want to exec about 12 dts packages within a sql job at the same time, the execution of dts's will be step2, and step1 will be something else. Basically first the step1 will be executed, and then the step2(which is nothing but the 12 dts packages) should be executed. I tried using the following t-sql statement within sql query analyser as:
execute master.dbo.xp_cmdshell
"dtsrun /s /U /P /Ndts1"
execute master.dbo.xp_cmdshell
"dtsrun /s /U /P /Ndts2"
By doing this, the first dts is getting executed and then once that's done the second dts is getting executed. Actually I want both the dts packages to be executed at the same time. Please help.
Thanks.
I need to insert the results into a temp table and i recieve the "MSDTC on server 'servername' is unavailable error".
declare @thestringall varchar(1000)
set @thestringall = 'select statment here'
insert into #temptable exec (@thestringall)
Thanks
Wooanaz
I need get the o/p of a system sp into a table. I am doing the following,
insert #repl_monitor
exec [distribution].sys.sp_replmonitorhelpsubscription @publisher =
N'FGRWA0508', @publisher_db = N'DB_Name', @publication = N'publication'
Code is really not important. Any sys SP can replace the above code.
I am getting the following error
Msg 8164, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_MSload_tmp_replication_status, Line 80
An INSERT EXEC statement cannot be nested.
I have seen the following link which discuss this issue,
http://www.sommarskog.se/share_data.html
But there is no solution there.
I tried with sp_executesql and EXEC(), but unable to get the result. Can anyone put some light?
------------------------
I think, therefore I am - Rene Descartes
I've got a case where I am bringing older data into a brand new DB. Unfortunately, there are several versions of the old DB and I won't know ahead of time which one I will be running against. The data's basicaly the same, the table names are the same, but the column schema is NOT.
Basiclly, I want to use a conditional on the Insert.
Code Block
CREATE TABLE TestTable
(Col1 int NULL,
Col2 varchar(50) NULL)
GO
IF EXISTS (SELECT *
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS
WHERE TABLE_CATALOG= 'TestDB'
AND TABLE_NAME ='TestTable'
AND COLUMN_NAME= 'Fred')
INSERT TestTable
(Col1, Col2, Fred)
VALUES
(1,'test', 'fredvalue')
This results in an "Unknown column" error.
What am I missing here and how can I accomplish it.
I know that I COULD build a SQL string and Exec it, but that is such a PITA and not very elegant.
Any help would be appreciated
Hi,
I have a stored procedure that transfers data from one database to another. I do a lot of manipulation to the data in between because although both databases are for the same purpose, the database designs are different. The two databases exist on two different servers. Till now my transfer procedure used a linked server to pull the data from one server to the other. This process takes a ton of time with complex queries across linked servers. I was researching on a faster method to transfer data and the only other working method seemed to be the insert..exec statement with which I can call a remote stored procedure which would run and return the results of the complex queries which I can then use locally as I wish.
My main question is, can I rely on insert..exec to work consistently and/or is there another method to achieve what I need that I'm totally ignorant of? I already know of inline/multi table value functions (they wont work across servers); openquery/openrowset (I need to be able to pass parameters); creating permanent tables to be used and then destroyed (not very appealing). I read an excellent article about these online by Erland Sommarskog (http://www.sommarskog.se/share_data.html) but I'm hoping someone can explain a little further.
Thanks all,
Anand
There must be some workaround for this. I need to grab the data from a stored proc on another server and place it into a temp table. I do not have the option to change the proc.
help if you can.
Hi,
has anyone come across deadlocks on sysindexes in tempdb where the insert/exec combination is used.
eg
create table #fred (IntColumn int)
insert into #fred exec ProcThatSelectsAnIntColumn
This is being done in a stored procedure, and is deadlocking with other procs which are doing vanilla #table work - creating, inserting into, updatind, selecting from, etc.
I have noticed similar deadlocks where a #table is created inside an explict transaction, and I wondered whether there is an implicit transaction created, but @@Nestlevel is not changing either before or after the insert/exec.
I can't find any references in knowledgebase.
Any pointers appreciated.
Cheers
Simon
________________________
Simon Davis
Bankers Trust Australia Limited
Asset Management Technology
Ph: 61 2 9259 9137
<mailto:Simon.Davis@Bankerstrust.com.au>
Hi all,
I have an sp that sends cdomail which requires 4 variables.
I want an after insert trigger that fills in the values for the sp from the record just submitted, how can i do that?
Sp code
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[sp_send_cdosysmail]
@From varchar(100) ,
@To varchar(100) ,
@Subject varchar(100)=" ",
@Body varchar(4000) =" "
/************************************************** *******************
This stored procedure takes the parameters and sends an e-mail.
All the mail configurations are hard-coded in the stored procedure.
Comments are added to the stored procedure where necessary.
References to the CDOSYS objects are at the following MSDN Web site:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cdosys/html/_cdosys_messaging.asp
************************************************** *********************/
AS
Declare @iMsg int
Declare @hr int
Declare @source varchar(255)
Declare @description varchar(500)
Declare @output varchar(1000)
--************* Create the CDO.Message Object ************************
EXEC @hr = sp_OACreate 'CDO.Message', @iMsg OUT
--***************Configuring the Message Object ******************
-- This is to configure a remote SMTP server.
-- http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/cdosys/html/_cdosys_schema_configuration_sendusing.asp
EXEC @hr = sp_OASetProperty @iMsg, 'Configuration.fields("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/sendusing").Value','2'
-- This is to configure the Server Name or IP address.
-- Replace MailServerName by the name or IP of your SMTP Server.
EXEC @hr = sp_OASetProperty @iMsg, 'Configuration.fields("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpserver").Value', 'smtp.bbeyond.nl'
-- Save the configurations to the message object.
EXEC @hr = sp_OAMethod @iMsg, 'Configuration.Fields.Update', null
-- Set the e-mail parameters.
EXEC @hr = sp_OASetProperty @iMsg, 'To', @To
EXEC @hr = sp_OASetProperty @iMsg, 'From', @From
EXEC @hr = sp_OASetProperty @iMsg, 'Subject', @Subject
-- If you are using HTML e-mail, use 'HTMLBody' instead of 'TextBody'.
EXEC @hr = sp_OASetProperty @iMsg, 'HTMLBody', @Body
EXEC @hr = sp_OAMethod @iMsg, 'Send', NULL
-- Sample error handling.
IF @hr <>0
select @hr
BEGIN
EXEC @hr = sp_OAGetErrorInfo NULL, @source OUT, @description OUT
IF @hr = 0
BEGIN
SELECT @output = ' Source: ' + @source
PRINT @output
SELECT @output = ' Description: ' + @description
PRINT @output
END
ELSE
BEGIN
PRINT ' sp_OAGetErrorInfo failed.'
RETURN
END
END
-- Do some error handling after each step if you have to.
-- Clean up the objects created.
EXEC @hr = sp_OADestroy @iMsg
GO
Hello,I want to share my experiences about using insert into exec which mayhelp others .Using SQL Server 2000, SP3 .Two Proceduers - Parent SP caliing a Child SP (nested ) . No Explicittransactions .I have defined a # table in Parent SP and calling a Child SP like thisinsert into #temp exec childsp ......Child SP has Select * from local # temp table ( local to child SP) as the last statement .When number of records are less ( around 1000 - 5000) Parent SPexecutes but slow .When the Child SP returns higher number of rows ( 1,00,000 or more )the SP will be running for hours with out completion .Although executing the child SP , with exec ChildSP .... with sameparameters it is completed in 2 mins for 3,00,000 rows .Resolution : - Define a temp table (say #tempChild ) in the Parent SP..In the Child SP instead of select * replace with insert into#tempChild select * from ...Also note that this problem is not noticed in SQL 2000 Server with SP4..This may be due to SP executing in implicit transactions .
View 1 Replies View RelatedI try to select a store procedure in SqlExpress2005 which inside store procedure execute another store procedure,
When I select it but it prompt error messages "An INSERT EXEC statement cannot be nested.".
In Fire bird /Interbase store procedure we can nested. Below are the code;
declare @dtReturnData Table(doccode nvarchar(20), docdate datetime, debtoraccount nvarchar(20))
Insert Into @dtReturnData
Exec GetPickingList 'DO', 0, 37256, 'N', 'N', 'YES'
Select doccode, docdate, debtoraccount
From @dtReturnData
Inside the GetPickList It will do like this, but most of the code I not included;
ALTER PROCEDURE GETPICKINGLIST
@doctype nvarchar(2),
@datefrom datetime,
@dateto datetime,
@includegrn char(1),
@includesa char(1),
@includedata nvarchar(5)
AS
BEGIN
declare @dtReturnData Table(doccode nvarchar(20),
docdate datetime,
debtoraccount nvarchar(20))
IF (@DOCTYPE = 'SI')
BEGIN
Insert Into @dtSALESINVOICEREGISTER
Exec SALESINVOICEREGISTER @DateFrom, @DateTo, @IncludeGRN, @IncludeSA, @IncludeData
END
ELSE
BEGIN
Insert Into @dtDELIVERYORDERREGISTER
Exec DELIVERYORDERREGISTER @DateFrom, @DateTo, @IncludeGRN, @IncludeSA, @IncludeData
END
Select doccode,docdate,debtoraccount From @dtReturnData
END
So how can I select a nested store procedure? can someone help me
Hi All,
I am having a problem with nested insert exec. Say for example I have three stored procedure procA, procB and procC.
I am executing procedure procC in procB; I am storing the values returned by procC in a tempTable. The code is
INSERT INTO #Temp
EXEC procC
And in procA, I am executing procB, and the values returned by procB are stored in another temp table. The code is
INSERT INTO #TempOne
EXEC procC
When I execute the procA, I am getting error as
An INSERT EXEC statement cannot be nested.
My requirement is like this, please give me a solution.
Thanks
i have a 3 or 4 cursors, and in the inner cursor i am inserting into a table from a sproc. i keep getting the error
An INSERT EXEC statement cannot be nested.
heres the actual insert code:
set @SQLString = 'EXEC ScoresGetlines '+cast(@customerID as char(10))+',' + cast(@programId as char(10))+',' + '"'+ @period +'",NULL,NULL,0'
INSERT INTO reportData
exec (@sqlString)
ive tried just a simple :
insert into reportdata
exec scoreGetLines @customerId,@programID...........
that still doesnt work. same error. how can this be sorted
I am using the following statement in a SP.
EXECUTE (' INSERT INTO #OutPut
EXEC h_DailyDividend
@TickerTable = '+@TickerTableName+',
@DateTable = '+@DateTableName+',
@Units = '+@Units
)
AND IN h_DailyDividend I am using the following statement.
EXECUTE (' INSERT INTO #TickerTable
EXEC h_SecMstr_SecMap_TQAExch_Info
@IDList = '+@TickerTable+',
@IsTable = 1,
@Type = 0,
@OutPutFormat = 0,
@VenType = 14 ')
And i am getting the following error.
Message: An INSERT EXEC statement cannot be nested.
Can any body help me out how to solve this problem.
Regards
Sulaman
Hi all,
I have to insert records using transact iin the stored procedure. I have some thing like:
DECLARE @Err varchar(100)
DECLARE insertQ varchar(1000)
SET @Err = 'Insertion data'
SET @insertQ =('INSERT INTO dbo.T_ERRORLOG (ERROR_DESCR) VALUES(' + @Err + ')')
EXEC insertQ
But it don't work. Can you help me to solve the problem plz?
Thanks a lot
TT
Hi
When i use my insert-exec in my proc, say it Y, and the inner proc is X (don't contain an other insert-exec). when i call the Y proc in sql query analyzer the call is executed and it get me back results.
But when I call the Y proc from an ASP page, the execution is aborted, and I don’t know why, I have tested many thinks but it doesn’t work (for exp: the use commit transaction, set ....).
Please could you tell me if i miss some things i should add to my procs for the IIS web server could have right to execute my Y proc
Configuration of my application
- IIS Web server 6.0
- Sql Server 2000 SP 2.0
- TSQL as a sql language (of course)
- ASP as web porgramming language
- The call of the insert exec proc is as following:
o INSERT INTO #TMP_F_B (
o Field1 ,
o Field2,
o Field3 ,
o …,
o )
o EXEC dbo.ps_a5s_rpt_charge700 @util, @annee , @perimetre , @secteur , @poste , @fournisseur , @err , @lib_err
Many thanks
Sincerly
HI,
WELL WE HAVE BEEN TRYING TO AUTOMATE A PROCEDURE OUT HERE,AND WE ARE TRYING TO CONVERT MOST OF THE THINGS INTO PROCEDURES.
BUT WE ARE GETTING A FEW HICCUPS. PLS HELP
THIS IS HOW IT GOES :-
CREATE PROCEDURE MY_PROC1
AS
BEGIN
ST1 .........;
ST2..........;
END
CREATE PROCEDURE MY_PROC2
AS
BEGIN
CREATE TABLE #TMP2
(COL1 DATATYPE
COL2 DATATYPE)
INSERT INTO #TMP2
EXEC MY_PROC1
ST1 .........;
ST2..........;
END
THIS PROCEDURE TOO RUNS WELL ,AFTER TAKING THE DATA FROM THE FIRST PROC IT MANIPUATES THE DATA ACCORDING TO THE CRITERIA SPECIFIED
NO PROBLEM TILL NOW.......
BUT,
CREATE PROCEDURE MY_PROC3
AS
BEGIN
CREATE TABLE #TMP3
(COL1 DATATYPE
COL2 DATATYPE)
INSERT INTO #TMP3
EXEC MY_PROC2
ST1 .........;
ST2..........;
END
THEN IT GIVES AN ERROR AS :-
"An INSERT EXEC statement cannot be nested."
CAN'T WE , FROM A PROCEDURE CALL A PROCEDURE WHICH CALLS A PROCEDURE........
WHAT IS THE NESTING LEVEL OF A PROCEDURE ?
IS THERE ANY WAY AROUND IT OR CAN IT BE DONE BY CHANGING SOME SETTINGS ?
PLS HELP ME OUT IN THIS
THANKS
I'd *like* to execute a sProc within another sProc, because this other one (let's call it dataProc) will provide me with results I need that are calculated based off execing other procs within that proc itself.
I'd like to use this data in a new sProc (we'll call it newProc), but I don't need NEARly all of the columns. The dataProc returns 1 row with 42 columns. I need about 4-5 of those for my newProc.
The dataProc does not have any output variables, and I do not want to change the signature, because several pages/apps use this existing dataProc.
My question:
Is there a way to INSERT INTO table EXEC dataProc
*Without* making a temp table that takes in every single column the dataProc puts out?
Any help is much appreciated.. thanks!
Hi,I have a sproc with 5 params that takes about 40 seconds to return.But when I Create a Temp table and do aInsert Into #tempExec sproc param1, param2, param3, param4, param5it never returns...any ideas?Thanks,Bill
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi,all,When I use following sql, an error occurs:insert into #tmprepEXECUTE proc_stat @start,@endThere is a "select * from #tmp " in stored procedure proc_stat, and theerror message is :Server: Msg 8164, Level 16, State 1, Procedure proc_stat, Line 42An INSERT EXEC statement cannot be nested.What's the metter? Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have 3 development SQL Servers A, B & C, all running SQL 2000 sp3 and Windows 2003. Servers B & C have a linked server pointing to A, and A has one pointing to B & C. The linkedservers all have RPC , RPC out enabled. I have a stored procedure called test on server A.
Create Proc test
as
Select Top 5 first_name, last_name from people
GO
--code ran on Servers B & C:
create table #tmptbl (nm varchar(100), nm2 varchar(100))
insert into #tmptbl
Exec ServerA.db1.dbo.test
When the Insert....Exec code above is ran from server B it works fine, however when I run it from Server C, I get error 7391
The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'SQLOLEDB' was unable to begin a distributed transaction.
[OLE/DB provider returned message: New transaction cannot enlist in the specified transaction coordinator. ]
OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'SQLOLEDB' ITransactionJoin::JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d00a]
But regular linked server calls (directly to tables) and openquery calls work fine from either server...
Eg
insert into #tmp
Select top 5 first_name, last_name from ServerA.db1.dbo.people
--and this works also
insert into #tmp
Select * from openquery(ServerA, 'Exec db1.dbo.test')
Both servers (B & C) appear to be configured the same, and
I have reconfigured MSDTC on all three boxes through control panel and component manager, have tried using SET xact_abort, SET implicit_transactions, registry hacks (TurnoffRPCsecurity), basically everything listed on Microsoft, and everything I've been able to find in these groups.
If anyone has any ideas, I'd like to hear them.
Tim.
I am using VS2005 (VB) to develop a PPC WM5.0 Program. And I am using SQLCE 3.0. My PPC Hardware is in 400MHz.
The question is when the program try to insert the first record into sdf database after each time the program started. It takes a long time. Does anyone know why and how can I fix it?
I will load the whole database into a dataset when the program start and do all the "Insert", "Update", "Delete" in this dataset and fill it into database after each action.
cn.Open()
sda = New SqlCeDataAdapter(SQL, cn) 'SQL = Select * From Table
scb = New SqlCeCommandBuilder(sda)
sda.Update(dataset)
cn.Close()
I check the sda.update(), it takes about 0.08s for filling one record into database normally. But:
1. Start the PPC Program
2. Load DB into dataset
3. Create a ONE new record in dataset
4. Fill back to DB
When I take this four steps everytime, the filling time is almost 1s or even more!
Actually, 0.08s is just a normal case. Sometimes, it still takes over 1s to filling back a dataset which only inserted one record when the program is running. (Even all inserted records are exactly the same in data jsut different in the integer key)
However, when I give up the dataset and using the following code:
cn.Open()
Dim cmd As New SqlCeCommand(SQL, cn) ' I have build the insert SQL before (Insert Into Table values(XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX All field)
cmd.CommandType = CommandType.Text
cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
cn.Close()
StartTime = Environment.TickCount
I found that it is still the same that the first inserted record takes more time, but just about 0.2s. And the normal insert time is around 0.02s. It is 4 times faster!!!
Hi,
We need to select rows from the database that have been recently inserted/updated. We have a main primary table (COMMIT_TEST) and a second update table (COMMIT_TEST_UPDATE). The update table contains the primary key and a LAST_UPDATE field which is a datetime (to tell us when an update occurred). Triggers on the primary table are used to populate the update table.
If we insert or update the primary table in a transaction, we would expect that the datetime of the insert/update would be at the commit, however it seems that the insert/update statement is cached and getdate() is executed at the time of the cache instead of the commit. This causes problems as we select rows based on LAST_UPDATE and a commit may occur later but the earlier insert timestamp is saved to the database and we miss that update.
We would like to know if there is anyway to tell the SQL Server to not execute the function getdate() until the commit, or any other way to get the commit to create the correct timestamp.
We are using default isolation level. We have tried using getdate(), current_timestamp and even {fn Now()} with the same results. SQL Queries that reproduce the problem are provided below:
/* Different functions to get current timestamp €“ all have been tested to produce the same results */
/*
SELECT GETDATE()
GO
SELECT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
GO
SELECT {fn Now()}
GO
*/
/* Use these statements to delete the tables to allow recreate of the tables */
/*
DROP TABLE COMMIT_TEST
DROP TABLE COMMIT_TEST_UPDATE
*/
/* Create a primary table and an UPDATE table to store the date/time when the primary table is modified */
CREATE TABLE dbo.COMMIT_TEST (PKEY int PRIMARY KEY, timestamp) /* ROW_VERSION rowversion */
GO
CREATE TABLE dbo.COMMIT_TEST_UPDATE (PKEY int PRIMARY KEY, LAST_UPDATE datetime, timestamp ) /* ROW_VERSION rowversion */
GO
/* Use these statements to delete the triggers to allow reinsert */
/*
drop trigger LOG_COMMIT_TEST_INSERT
drop trigger LOG_COMMIT_TEST_UPDATE
drop trigger LOG_COMMIT_TEST_DELETE
*/
/* Create insert, update and delete triggers */
create trigger LOG_COMMIT_TEST_INSERT on COMMIT_TEST for INSERT as
begin
declare @time datetime
select @time = getdate()
insert into COMMIT_TEST_UPDATE (PKEY,LAST_UPDATE)
select PKEY, getdate()
from inserted
end
GO
create trigger LOG_COMMIT_TEST_UPDATE on COMMIT_TEST for UPDATE as
begin
declare @time datetime
select @time = getdate()
update COMMIT_TEST_UPDATE
set LAST_UPDATE = getdate()
from COMMIT_TEST_UPDATE, deleted, inserted
where COMMIT_TEST_UPDATE.PKEY = deleted.PKEY
end
GO
/* In our application deletes should never occur so we don€™t log when they get modified we just delete them from the UPDATE table */
create trigger LOG_COMMIT_TEST_DELETE on COMMIT_TEST for DELETE as
begin
if ( select count(*) from deleted ) > 0
begin
delete COMMIT_TEST_UPDATE
from COMMIT_TEST_UPDATE, deleted
where COMMIT_TEST_UPDATE.PKEY = deleted.PKEY
end
end
GO
/* Delete any previous inserted record to avoid errors when inserting */
DELETE COMMIT_TEST WHERE PKEY = 1
GO
/* What is the current date/time */
SELECT GETDATE()
GO
BEGIN TRANSACTION
GO
/* Insert a record into the primary table */
INSERT COMMIT_TEST (PKEY) VALUES (1)
GO
/* Simulate additional processing within this transaction */
WAITFOR DELAY '00:00:10'
GO
/* We expect at this point that the date is written to the database (or at least we need some way for this to happen) */
COMMIT TRANSACTION
GO
/* get the current date to show us what date/time should have been committed to the database */
SELECT GETDATE()
GO
/* Select results from the table €“ we see that the timestamp is 10 seconds older than the commit, in other words it was evaluated at */
/* the insert statement, even though the row could not be read with a SELECT as it was uncommitted */
SELECT * FROM COMMIT_TEST
GO
SELECT * FROM COMMIT_TEST_UPDATE
Any help would be appreciated, we understand we could make changes to the application/database to approximate what we need, but all the solutions have identified suffer from possible performance issues, or could still lead to missing deals (assuming the commit time is larger than some artifical time window).
Regards,
Mark
Hello, I recently view a webcast of sql injection, and at this moment I created a user, and give dbo to this user, and this same user, is the one I have in the connection string of my web application, I want to create a user to prevent sql injection attacks, I mean that user wont be able to drop or create objects, only select views, tables, exec insert,update, deletes and exec stored procedures.
Is any easy way to do this?
A database role and then assing that role to the user?
Hello,
I have a stored procedure where I run an insert statement. I want to knwo if it is possible to do it using a variable for the table name (either in-line or with an EXEC statement without building a string first and executing that string. See examples of what I am talking about in both cases below:
I want to be able to do this (with or without the EXEC) :
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DECLARE @NewTableNameOut as varchar(100)
Set @NewTableNameOut = 'TableToInsertInto'
EXEC(
Insert Into @NewTableNameOut
Select * From tableToSelectFrom
)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I can not do the above because it says I need to declare/set the @NewTableNameOut variable (assuming it is only looking at this for the specific insert statement and not at the variable I set earlier in the stored procedure.
I can do it like this by creating a string with the variable built into the string and then executing the string but I want to know if I can do it like I have listed above.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
DECLARE @NewTableNameOut as varchar(100)
Set @NewTableNameOut = 'TableToInsertInto'
EXEC(
'Insert Into ' + @NewTableNameOut + ' ' +
'Select * From tableToSelectFrom'
)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
It is not an issue for my simple example above but I have some rather large queries that I am building and I want to run as described above without having to build it into a string.
Is this possible at all?
If you need more info please let me know.
Greeting.
I use OdbcConnection inside clr procedure, for getting data. If I use simple EXEC dbo.clr_proc - all is OK. If I use INSERT...EXEC I recive error message: Distributed transaction enlistment failed.
I set MSDTC security options for No Authentification and Allow inbound and Allow outbound, but it's no use.
Have this problem solution? May be, I must use another method to get my data?
P.S. Linked Servers and OPENQUERY is not applicable. Sybase not describe columns in stored proc result set and one stored proc may return different result set by params.
P.S.S. Sorry for bad english.
I have a table with the following columns employeeSessionID, OpDate, OpHour, sessionStartTime, sessionCloseTime. I need to see how many users remain active per hour. I can calculate how many logged in per hour, but I am stumped on how to count how many are active per hour. I have a single table that stores login data. I have created a query that pulls out the only the data needed from the table into a temp table using this query. Also note it is possible that the sessionCloseTime is null if the device has not been logged out this would need to be counted a active.
TABLE NAME #empSessionLog Contains the time stamp data OpDate, sessionStartTime and sessionCloseTime.
OpDatesessionStartTimesessionCloseTime
2015-01-202015-01-20 14:32:59.1302015-01-20 14:33:14.6299166
2015-01-202015-01-20 06:58:33.7302015-01-20 15:27:16.9133442
2015-01-202015-01-20 09:56:22.8402015-01-20 17:56:29.7555853
2015-01-202015-01-20 05:59:18.6132015-01-20 14:05:19.0426707
[code]....
can see how many sessions logged in per hour with the following statement:
SELECT
opDate,
FORMAT(DATEPART(HOUR, sessionStartTime), '00') AS opHour,
Count(*) AS Total
FROM #empSessionLog
Group BY opDate, FORMAT(DATEPART(HOUR, sessionStartTime), '00')
Order BY opDate, FORMAT(DATEPART(HOUR, sessionStartTime), '00') ASCResults:
opDateopHourTotal
2015-01-20041
[code]....
Where I am stuck is how do I count the sessions that remain active per hour until the session is closed with the sessionCloseTime.
Hi
I am having some teething problems while installing SQL on a 3 node cluster. Within the Cluster configuration I have 3 Cluster Groups with each of them having their associated disk resources. All these disk resources physically exist on a SAN.
The actual cluster is running absolutely fine and I can access all the disks from their respective owner node. The problem only starts when I start installing SQL Server 2005 on this cluster. I specify the Cluster group from the Cluster Group Selection and choose the desired partition and then the error message pops up
"There is not enough diskspace on the destination disk for the current SQL Server data files. To proceed, free up disk space to make room for data files, or install the data files to a different drive"
But the disk I am trying to install it on is 264Gb and none of it is used. I have also tried to change it to a different disk within the same Cluster group but to no avail. I have even tried to install it in a different cluster group all together but I get the same error message.
I have googled around havent found anything so far. The disks have got full permissions for the account I am installing SQL with.
Any help will be much appreciated.
Regards
Adnan
Hi
I am newbie in SQL Clustering. I have set up a Windows Server Cluster with 2 nodes and am having the following problem with Physical Disk resource for cluster groups:
My Default Cluster Group (named Cluster Group) has IP Address, Network Name, Physical Disk and MSDTC resources. In addition to that my Default SQL Server instance resources are also in this group. I had this initial set up for Active/Passive mode.
Now I am trying to set up a SQL Cluster in Active/Active mode. For this I have to install another instance of SQL Server in the existing cluster and make a separate cluster group for its resources. I made a new cluster group (SQL Instance Group) with an IP Address and a Network Name resource for this new instance but I dont have any Physical Disk resource to allocate to it. As such while installing the SQL Server Instance I get stuck when I'm asked to select the quorum disk to be used.
Is it possible to configure two quorum disks, one for each group?
What's the concept of dedicated disks resource for each sql instance in a group? Is this same as the quorum disk? If this is not a shared disk how do I configure a dedicated disk resource for my second cluster group (SQL Instance Group)?
Anyone could please help me out with this?
Hi folks,
We are going thru the process of scoping an active/active cluster at one site.
I was wondering whether there will be any issues with mirroring (DB by DB) off the cluster into non clustered server at an alternate DRP site.
Regards, Brian
Sutherland
Hi all, My aim to install active/active 2 node SQL 2005 cluster. I have installed sql cluster on one mode, which automatically installed on node 2.
it works great. However When i tried to install second virtual server, it is not allowing me to install.
it says already install, can anyone tell me how to install active active cluster
Hi,
We are trying to set up an active/active configuration of a SQL Server
cluster, and we had a few questions.
Initially, we want to have 2 Database Servers that would share the same
Database (both reading/writing to the same tables).
However, from reading the MS docs, we find out that we can have what
they call an "active/active" configuration using a Cluster but they
need to have 2 different disk sets, i.e. having 2 separate databases.
If this assumption is correct, how does the data get synchronised
between the 2 databases (that are on the 2 different disks sets)?
Can anyone help? thanks
Axel
ACTIVE/ACTIVE SQL Server 2000 Cluster
This was my plan.
Physical box - box1,box2
virtual box - virtual1
i have a active/passive cluster virtual1 (primary node box1, secondary box2)
I am creating another virtual box on box2 as primary node by name virtual2)
whenever my installation setup runs my default server name is greyed out. it always requires a instance name.
Is that the way it should work?
i can only use instance for active/active failover?
please advice