I want to merge these queries in one query. When I use UNION ALL parameter sth_tarih sort is wrong.
SELECT TOP 5 sth_stok_kod,sth_evrakno_seri,sth_evrakno_sira,cha_kod ,sth_RECno,sth_tarih
FROM STOK_HAREKETLERI AS SH INNER JOIN CARI_HESAP_HAREKETLERI AS CHH ON SH.sth_evrakno_sira= CHH.cha_evrakno_sira WHERE sth_stok_kod = (
SELECT sth_stok_kod FROM STOK_HAREKETLERI WHERE sth_RECno = (SELECT MAX (sth_RECno) FROM STOK_HAREKETLERI) ) AND sth_evraktip = 3
ORDER BY sth_stok_kod ASC,sth_tarih DESC
Hello, i would like to take the following select statements and make one table out of them. However, i want each statement to be its own column. The Union adds all of the statements into one colummn. Ultimately, i would like to place these into a stored procedure. Any help would be apreciated. Here are the statements:
select count(chalf_upd) as CHalfFile from elpc where elpc.chalf_upd is not null
select count (halfupd) as HalfFile from elpc where elpc.halfupd is not null
select count (cstaff_upd) as CStaffFile from elpc where elpc.cstaff_upd is not null
select count (staffupd) as StaffFile from elpc where elpc.staffupd is not null
select count (coffice_up) as COfficeFile from elpc where elpc.coffice_up is not null
select count (officeupd) as OfficeFile from elpc where elpc.officeupd is not null
select count (signupd) as SignFile from elpc where elpc.signupd is not null
select count (informupd) as ISignFile from elpc where elpc.informupd is not null
select count(staff_color_lastupd) as InStaffFile from staff_graphics_lastupdate where staff_graphics_lastupdate.staff_color_lastupd is not null
Strange Game. The only winnng move is not to play.
I need help in figuring out the proper way of writing a stored procedure out correctly to get my desired datasource. In my ocnIdToRatePlanOptions table, I will recieve a parameter via request.querystring @ocnId to filter out my result set for ocnIdToRatePlan table. Based on the ocnId filtered I want it to select the corresponding tables too.So, if a querystring is passed that is 3955 in my ocnIdToRatePlanOptions table, I want it to use it to create a select for RatePlan1. If a querystring is passed that is 1854 in my ocnIdToRatePlanOptions table, I want it to use to create a select for RatePlan2. Is this possible? ocnIdToRatePlanOptions Table [otrpoRefId] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,[FKocnId] [nvarchar](4) NOT NULL,[FKrpoRefId] [int] NOT NULL,1, 3955, 12, 1854, 2RatePlan1 Table[rp1RefId] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,[FKocnId] [nvarchar](4) NOT NULL[fee] [decimal](18, 2) NOT NULL1, 3955, 1.002, 2350, 2.00RatePla2 Table[rp2RefId] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,[FKocnId] [nvarchar](4) NOT NULL,[q_0_50] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_0_50] DEFAULT ((225)),[q_51_100] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_51_100] DEFAULT ((325)),[q_101_150] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_101_150] DEFAULT ((345)),[q_151_200] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_151_200] DEFAULT ((400)),[q_201_250] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_201_250] DEFAULT ((450)),[q_251_300] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_251_300] DEFAULT ((500)),[q_301_400] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_300_400] DEFAULT ((650)),[q_401_600] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_401_600] DEFAULT ((950)),[q_601] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_601] DEFAULT ((1.50)) 1,1854, 225.00, 325.00, 345.00, 400.00, 450.00, 500.00, 650.00, 950.00, 1.502,8140, 225.00, 325.00, 345.00, 400.00, 450.00, 500.00, 650.00, 950.00, 1.50
My stored procedure is giving me an error, it says "Unable to parse query text", and I'm certain the problem is with the SELECT statements. What am I doing wrong?
I want to get a column count several times in one query using differentfilters but can't work out how to do it - can anyone point me in the rightdirection?For example, how would combine these two selects into one query that willlist the total and filtered actions:SELECT COUNT(actions) as actioncount, locationFROM mytableGROUP BY locationSELECT COUNT(actions) as actioncount, locationFROM mytableWHERE mycondition IS NULLGROUP BY location
I have two tables of news feed NewsHeader & NewsDetails NewsHeader: Time Header 10:15:34 AM News1 10:15:34 AM News1 10:15:34 AM News1 11:19:39 AM News2 11:19:39 AM News2 12:35:04 PM News3 12:35:04 PM News3
NewsDetails Time Text RowC 10:15:34 AM ABC 1 10:15:34 AM DEFG 2 10:15:34 AM HIJKL 3 11:19:39 AM AABB 1 11:19:39 AM CCDD 2 12:35:04 PM ZZYY 1 12:35:04 PM XXWW 2
Required Output Time Header Text 10:15:34 AM News1 ABCDEFGHIJKL 11:19:39 AM News2 AABBCCDD 12:35:04 PM News3 ZZYYXXWW
hi guys, just wondering if there's a SSIS component out there some what similar to Merge join but can take up more than two inputs to join.
basically i have a big package with data sources coming from everywhere, they all have a unique column i can join on, so right now, i use merge join for every two sources, then join the output of that to another source so on and so forth. it would be easier if i can just join all of the sources in one component rather than putting a merge join for every single join. is there such a component out there, custom built maybe?
I have 1 publisher in MI and 3 pull subscribers (1 local subscriber in MI and 2 in NC).
I am trying to decide whether to use a central distributor or a distributor per subscriber. It is my understanding that if I use a central distributor, large transactions that are being process will block other transactions from happening and increase latency. Most of the transaction will be relatively small, but several times during the day clients update large amounts that cannot be predicted. I want to make sure the other locations are not waiting on a large update to be processed through the distributor.
My current plan is to create subscribers with their own distributor. What are the issues with doing that over a central distributor?
Basically if the type code is 1 one then move the data to column phone1, if the type is 2 then move it to column phone2.
This would be fairly simple if we always have type codes 1 and 2. But sometimes we can have type 1 and not type 2, or we could have type 2 and not type1.
Right now we only have 2 type codes. But, in the future we could be adding a 3rd type. So that would add a 3rd column (phone3).
Below is my code that I have written. I move the data into a temp table then list it. I am thinking of making this a view to my table. It works just fine. My question is, is there a better and more efficient way of doing this?
CREATE TABLE #Contacts ( id INT PRIMARY KEY, phone1 VARCHAR(15), phone2 VARCHAR(15) )
-- Insert the records for type 1
INSERT INTO #Contacts SELECT id, phone_num, NULL FROM test1 WHERE type_code = '1'
-- Insert the records for type 2, if the id does not exist for type 1
INSERT INTO #Contacts SELECT id, NULL, phone_num FROM test1 WHERE NOT EXISTS ( SELECT 1 FROM #Contacts WHERE #Contacts.id = test1.id ) AND test1.type_code = '2'
-- if the id has both type 1 and 2, update the phone2 column with the data from type 2
UPDATE #Contacts SET phone2 = test1.phone_num FROM #contacts JOIN test1 ON test1.id = #Contacts.id WHERE type_code = '2' SELECT id, phone1, phone2 FROM #Contacts DROP TABLE #Contacts
I've a requirement where I need to merge multiple rows in single rows. For example in the attached image output, I need to return a single column for type Case like this.
CH0, CH1, CH2, CHX Case CM0, CM1, CM2, CMX Mechanical
I'm using T-SQL to generate the column type. Below is my DDL.
USE tempdb GO CREATE TABLE ProdCodes (Prefix char(8), Code char(5)
I've a requirement where I need to merge multiple rows in single rows. For example in the attached image output, I need to return a single column for type Case like this.
CH0, CH1, CH2, CHX Case CM0, CM1, CM2, CMX Mechanical
I'm using T-SQL to generate the column type. Below is my DDL.
USE tempdb GO CREATE TABLE ProdCodes (Prefix char(8), Code char(5)
I am trying to build a SQL select query, but am struggling a little bit.I have a table with multiple inventory transactions, each with an ID and weight.
What I want to do is write a SQL query that returns records where there is a transaction for SysProg = 238, but return the weights for some of the other transactions in columns on the same row.Basically, from the above data set, what I would like to return is:
ID Weight (271) Weight (238) Weight (61 or 59) 210359 986 985 984 354852 568 523 521
I have a problem where my users complain that a select statement takes too long, at 90 seconds, to read 120 records out of a database. The select statement reads from 9 tables three of which contain 1000000 records, the others contain between 100 and 250000 records. I have checked that each column in the joins are indexed - they are (but some of them are clustered indexes, not unclustered). I have run the SQL Profiler trace from the run of the query through the "Database Engine Tuning Advisor". That just suggested two statistics items which I added (no benefit) and two indexes for tables that are not involved at all in the query (I didn't add these). I also ran the query through the Query window in SSMS with "Include Actual Execution Plan" enabled. This showed that all the execution time was being taken up by searches of the clustered indexes. I have tried running the select with just three tables involved, and it completes fast. I added a fourth and it took 7 seconds. However there was no WHERE clause for the fourth table, so I got a cartesian product which might have explained the problem. So my question is: Is it normal for such a type of read query to take 90 seconds to complete? Is there anything I could do to speed it up. Any other thoughts? Thanks
Can we insert into multiple table using merge statement?I'm using SQL Server 2008 R2 and below is my MERGE query...
-> I'm checking if the record exist in Contact table or not. If it exist then I will insert into employee table else I will insert into contact table then employee table.
WITH Cont as ( Select ContactID from Contact where ContactID=@ContactID) MERGE Employee as NewEmp Using Cont as con
is there anyway i can merge select statement and insert statement together?
what i want to do is select few attributes from a table and then directly insert the values to another table without another trigger.
for example, select * from product and with the values from product, insert into new_product (name, type, date) values (the values from select statment)
I have resulting rows from a query similar to the following:
The data is coming from a single table that contains only one coverage code column and one coverage code date, but the end user wants the two coverage code types and dates combined into a single row. So the SELECT looks something like this:
SELECT [Employee ID] = emp.employee_id, [Coverage Code 1] = enr.coverage_code, [Coverage Date 1] = enr.coverage_date, [Coverage Code 2] = case when enr.product_type = 'Accident.Accident' then enr.coverage_code else NULL end,
[Code] ....
I basically want to merge the like Employee ID's together into a single row like the following:
I know I have done this before and it is probably pretty simple.
I'm working on a script to merge multiple columns(30) into a single column separated by a semicolons, but I'm getting the following error below. I tried to convert to the correct value. but I'm still getting an error.
Error: "Conversion failed when converting the varchar value ';' to data type tinyint".
I'm self-taught on T-SQL so forgive me if this is a dumb question. If I have a stored procedure containing the following...
IF [condition] SELECT ... ELSE SELECT ...
Would it be more efficient/proper/etc. to break those two SELECTs out into their own SPs and execute them from the IF statement?
IF [condition] EXEC [SP] ELSE EXEC [SP]
I've got a number of pretty lengthy SPs that I think are pretty tight but if I can make them more efficient by breaking them down into smaller tasks, I'd rather do that.
What is your opinion using Sub Selects versus Joining Tables?
SELECT (SELECT COMPANY_NAME FROM COMPANIES WHERE COMPANY_ID = c.COMPANY_ID) AS 'Company Name'
FROM COMPANY_ORDERS c
vs
SELECT co.COMPANY_NAME AS 'Company Name' FROM COMPANIES c, COMPANY co WHERE c.COMPANY_ID = co.COMPANY_ID
I'm not having any problems, just curious what everyone is practicing and is "system-actically" more resourceful. I personally like using Sub Selects (or Sub Queries) so this way I wouldn't have to deal with complex joins and where conditions, especially when your just dealing with a releational table.
