1. How to estimate how many free RAM I need. If I plan to create five 2 Gb memory optimized tables...10 Gb RAM for data and how many additional memory?
2. How to prevent memory overflow if there will be too much data in those tables? I dont want that my server down entirely
Hello,
I'm havin a problem with my database server in the network, i'm running a windows 2003 server standard edition with sql server 2005 standard edition.
the problem is that the server get stock and the performance of the whole network is affected, when i use the tak manager to monitor the performance i can see that the sqlservr.exe proccess is using 1,397,928 k of memory usage, in the performance monitor the graphics get crazy and the cpu usage grows up untill 85%.
Can you please let me know if there is something that i can do to normalize the server performance in order to let the network user work with the applications feeded by this server.
Thanks in advance for your help.
This morning msmdsrv.exe looked like the following in Task Manager:
Memory Usage: 600,000 K
VM Size: 2,500,000 K
If I understand correctly, that means that a good deal of SSAS memory has been swapped to disk by the OS. Is there any way to prevent this? (I have read about using the Lock Pages In Memory privilege at http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms179301.aspx which lets SQL prevent the OS from paging sqlservr.exe memory. I don't suppose there's an equivalent SSAS setting.)
In particular, the symptom I'm seeing is that after we finish processing, all that paged memory has to be loaded back into memory before the transaction can be committed. Committing the transaction is usually very quick. But when most of the SSAS process memory is pages, it takes quite a while, during which I can see the Memory Usage number in Task Manager growing. (I don't think it's a blocked transaction commit.)
In SQL Server 2014, how big for the block size is better for performance? 64 KB? 4 KB?
For normal database files, best practise is 64 KB disk block size. Not sure if it is same for memory-optimized filegroup.
Hi,
How can I prevent a colleage to delete tables in a specific database.
Yes he has access to Enterprise Manager. We would like to allow him read only to the live databases.
Is this possible?
When I execute the below stored procedure I get the error that "Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type int".
USE [FileSharing]
GO
/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[xlaAFSsp_reports] Script Date: 24.07.2015 17:04:10 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
[Code] .....
Msg 8115, Level 16, State 2, Procedure xlaAFSsp_reports, Line 25
Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type int.
The statement has been terminated.
(1 row(s) affected)
Hi,
I would like to know if we can define an unsigned integer data type in SQL Server 2005. We have a situation where one of the integer columns will reach its 2 billion limit. I want to know if there's any way in which I can extend this to say 4 billion by making the data type unsigned or any other way which doesn't require me to change the data type to bigint.
Any help is highly appreciated.
TIA
Ritesh
We are running SQL Server 2005 express on Windows 2003. The database server gets significant amounts of data.
Because of the 4GB data limit we have a daily cron task which goes through and deletes data older then 90 days.
We would like a way to archive this data instead of deleting it. Is there any way to take data and compress it and store it in a different way, so that if needed, customers can query directly out from the compressed data? Cleary querying from compressed would be slower but that is ok.
Any other solutions that would allow us to archive data instead of deleting it? Thanks.
Hello,
is there a way to say to SQL Server to make the data not readable?
Regards
Markus
I have a table with 3 columns: ID, Status, DateTime.
I created a stored procedure to insert a staus value for each ID. This will run every hour. The DateTime stores the time, date when the Status was inserted.
If the procedure was to be run a second time in hour window I do not want any Status to be inserted.
Note: that I cannot rely on the procedure being run at exactly the right time - if it was scheduled to run on the hour (i.e at 1:00, 2:00, 3 :00 etc) but didn't run until 1:20 it sould still be able to run at 2:00.
Does anyone know if there is anyway I can gaurd against this?
I have a table storing only 2 FKs, let's say PID, MID
Is there any way that I can check distinct data before row is added to this table?
For example, current data is
PID MID------------100 2001100 2005101 3002102 1009102 7523102 2449
If my query is about to insert PID 100, MID 2001, since it's existing data, i don't want to add it. Can I use trigger to solve this issue?
Thanks.
Suppose I have a database storing some confidential information, such
as legal information, medical or financial records, etc., and a
Web site with a membership system so that only authorized users can
view the information.
I understand I can encrypt the information, and the user's passwords,
so that if the database is compromised it still shouldn't be possible
for an outsider to view the confidential information.
However, what about people who have legitimate access to the database,
such as the DBA, Web developer, etc., but who should not be able to
view the confidential information? For example, even though the
user's password was encrypted, what would stop the DBA from replacing
the user's password with his own (encrypted) password, then logging in
and viewing the user's info, then copying back the original encrypted
password? Or, adding a new user for himself with whatever
permissions he chooses?
hi..
How do i prevent other users from changing the data of my tables? Means one can change data using only my login rest others cannot even DBA or also from server administrator
If a user is a member of a role which would allow him to execute a proc which updates a table, and he is then granted db_denydatawriter , can he still update the table through the proc? SS2000 SP4.
Thanks,
michael
Since posting this I tested the scenario and YES! The user was still able to execute an update proc even though the user excuting the proc was granted db_denydatawriter.
l'm running this procedure and l get this error. All l'm trying to do is to get the size of the database and its objects and what the size should be so that its sized right. Is there a better way of doing this ?
CREATE PROCEDURE sp_totalsize as
SELECT o.name 'Table', SUM(c.length) 'Record size',
MAX (i.rows) '#of rows',
CONVERT (decimal (10, 4), SUM (c.length * i.rows)/(1024.00 * 1024.00)) 'Approx. size (MB)'
FROM sysobjects o, syscolumns c, sysindexes i
WHERE o.id = c.id
AND o.id = i.id
AND (i.indid = 1 or i.indid = 0)
AND o.type = 'U'
GROUP BY o.name
COMPUTE SUM (CONVERT (decimal (10,4), SUM (c.length * i.rows)/(1024.00 * 1024.00)))
GO
(17 row(s) affected)
Server: Msg 8115, Level 16, State 2, Procedure sp_totalsize, Line 3
Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type int.
Under certain circumstances I am getting the following error
"Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type int"
when running the following code:
SELECT Count(*), Sum(GrossWinAmount)
FROM LGSLog
WHERE
(CurrentDate >= '9/1/2004 8:00:00 AM') And (CurrentDate <= '9/27/2004 7:59:59 AM')
If I remove the "Sum(GrossWinAmount)" from the select, it works fine. I therefore believe that Sum is causing the error. Is there a version of Sum that works with larger variables, such as a BigInt? If not, is there some way to do the equivalent using larger numbers? I need to allow for the possibility of obtaining one month's summary, and sometimes the summary value is apparently too large for Sum to handle.
I've got this error message while generate the output with ASP:
"Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server (0x80004005)
Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type int."
it indicate that the error is related to this line:
"rc1.Movenext"
where rc1 is set as objconn.Execute(sql).
Not all outputs result like this, it happens when it has many relationships with other records, especially with those records which also have many relationships with other records.
Can anyone suggest a solution?
I've tried to increase the size of the database file, but it doesn't work.
This is the error in my query:
[Err] 22003 - [SQL Server] Arithmetic overflow error converting numeric to data type numeric.
If tried [%TAX] DECIMAL (10, 2) I have the correct output, but I need 4 decimal in my output.
Code:
MATNUMB-VER-EXENUMB-VER-RIC%TAX
a476427228.1515,17%
b9241314323.1515,50%
c7781510878.1413,98%
d7480019601.2626,20%
e877618297.099,45%
[Code] .....
Hi, I have a stored procedure that looks like this:...WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0BEGINDECLARE @MyCount int ; EXEC spLoanQuestionnaireCriteria @AuditSelectedLoanID, @Criteria, @MyCount OUTPUTEND ...SELECT * FROM #Categories... Executing this stored procedure will return me 1 table for each time the EXEC statement is called that only has on column (MyCount)I really don't need this data to be returned, it is only used for some internal calculations in the stored procedureThe stored procedure should only return the results from SELECT * FROM #Categories in 1 table.Is there a Keyword I can use to exclude the EXEC results being returned to the dataset? Thanks in advance,Andre
View 2 Replies View RelatedIn my database some of the store procedures getting the data from xml nodes.so I need to implement the validation to xml data for prevent sql injection.
View 0 Replies View RelatedI'm trying to find a way to maintain the data that was UPDATEd in a table from being overwritten.
I used UPDATE in a table to include missing data. However, since I do not have access to the original table from where the data is derived, when I run my query, it knocks out the data in my table that was updated, because it is linked to the orginal table that has the blank fields. A few users do not have an employee email, and this has to be updated with a personal email account for now.
My update works fine, but is there a way I can use the statement in my query so that it updates each time it is run to maintain the user email address? This will solve the problem of not having to change the original table that I do not have access to.
if exists (select * test..dbo.Employee)
truncate TABLE
test.. dbo.Employee
insert into test.. dbo.Employee (EmployeeNumber
, EmplUsername
[Code] ....
Hi all,In the beginning of this month I've build a website with a file-upload-control. When uploading a file, a record (filename, comment, datetime) gets written to a SQLExpress database, and in a gridview a list of the files is shown. On the 7th of September I uploaded some files to my website, and it worked fine. In the database, the datetime-record shows "07/09/2006 11:45". When I try to upload a file today, it gives me the following error: Error: Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type datetime. The statement has been terminated.While searching in google, i found it might have something to do with the language settings of my SQLExpress, I've tried changing this, but it didn't help. What I find weird is that it worked fine, and now it doesn't anymore. Here is my code of how I get the current date to put it into the database:1 SqlDataSource2.InsertParameters.Add("DateInput", DateTime.Now.ToString());
Am I doing something wrong, or am I searching for a solution in the wrong place? best regards, Dimitri
Hi,
I'm having this error with my page, user picks the date -using the AJAX Control Toolkit Calender with the format of ( dd/MM/yyyy ).
It looks like the application current format is MM/dd/yyyy, because it shows the error page if the day is greater than 12, like: 25/03/2007
What is wrong?
Here is the error page:
Server Error in '/' Application.
Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type datetime.The statement has been terminated.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type datetime.The statement has been terminated.
Any help will be appreciated!
In my sql statement, I don't have any datatype as INT, when I run it, give me error as 'Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type int'.
example :
select column1, 2, 3 .....
from (select sum(float) as column1 , ....)
When I hop my cursor on top of column1, it shows (int,null)
The following codes give me the error "arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type datetime" Unfortunately, the datatype of date of this database is still varchar(50)
select date from tbltransaction
where datepart(wk,convert(datetime,date,103)) = 15
I am attempting to setup a replication from SQL Server 2005 that will be read by SQL Server Compact Edition (beta). I'm having trouble getting the Publication Wizard to create the Publication. Sample table definition that I'm replicating:
USE dbPSMAssist_Development;
CREATE TABLE corporations (
id NUMERIC(19,0) IDENTITY(1964,1) NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY,
idWas NUMERIC(19,0) DEFAULT 0,
logIsActive BIT DEFAULT 1,
vchNmCorp VARCHAR(75) NOT NULL,
vchStrtAddr1 VARCHAR(60) NOT NULL,
vchNmCity VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL,
vchNmState VARCHAR(2) NOT NULL,
vchPostalCode VARCHAR(10) NOT NULL,
vchPhnPrimary VARCHAR(16) NOT NULL,
);
CREATE INDEX ix_corporations_nm ON corporations(vchNmCorp, id);
GO
When the wizard gets to the step where it is creating the publication, I get the following error message:
Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type bigint. Changed database context to 'dbPSMAssist_Development'. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 8115).
I can find no information on what this error is or why I am receiving the error. Any ideas on how to fix would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance ...
David L. Collison
Any day above ground is a good day.
this query is running fine in 2008 , but its not working in 2005 below is the error Msg 8115, Level 16, State 2, Line 1 Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type int.there is some problem in converting date in cte
with a
as
(
SELECT dbname = DB_NAME(database_id) ,
[DBSize] = CAST( ((SUM(ms.size)* 8) / 1024.0) AS DECIMAL(18,2) )
,
COALESCE(CONVERT(VARCHAR(12), MAX(bus.backup_finish_date), 101),'01/01/1900') AS LastBackUpTime
FROM sys.master_files ms
inner join msdb.dbo.backupset bus ON bus.database_name = DB_NAME()
[code]....
I'm running this procedure which insert into table_name(id, name.....) select id, name.... from table_name. For some reason the tempdb data file grow up to 200GB. The tempdb is set to expand unrestricted by 10%. How can I prevent that from hapening? Thanks.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI thought I'd post this quick problem and answer, as I couldn't find the answer when searching for it.
I tried to call a stored procedure on SQL Server 2000 using the System.Data.SqlClient objects, and was not expecting any unusual issues. However when I came to call the Fill method I received the error "Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type int."
My first checks were the obvious ones of verifying that I'd provided all the correct datatypes and had no unexpected null values, but I found nothing out of order. The problem turns out to be a difference on the maximum values for integers between C# and SQL Server 2000. Previously having hit issues with SQL Server integers requiring Long Integer types in VB6, I was aware that these are 32-bit integers, so I was passing in Int32 variables. The problem was that Int32.MaxValue is not a valid integer for SQL Server. Seeing as I was providing an abitrary upper value for records-per-page (to fetch all in one page), I was simply able to change this to Int16.MaxValue and will hit no further problems as this is also well beyond any expected range for this parameter.
If anyone can name off the top of their heads what value should be provided as a maximum integer for SQL Server 2000, this might be a useful addition, but otherwise I hope this spares others some hunting if they also experience this problem.
James Burton
I represent a software development house and we have developed a client server system based on SQL Server. Most of our customers have already purchased Enterprise License of SQL Server, therefore they own the SA Login and Password. We are bound to attach our Database with their Server on their machine.
My question is how can we stop a System Administrator of SQL Server to view our Database Structure, Queries, Data installed on their SQL Server on their machine.
Our database structure is a trade secret and we cant reveal the structure to the client.
please answer this question by email to me at farhandotcom@gmail.com
Thanks & Regards
Farhan
We've been using SQL Server 2005 for a while as the db for our web app. Everything has been working fine, until yesterday when we started getting a "Arithmetic operation resulted in an overflow. (System.Data)" error message when trying to connect from SQL Server Management Studio or from our web app. This only happens when trying to connect remotely, although remote connections have worked for us perfectly in the past. The full error message is reproduced below. Thanks ahead of time for any help. ===================================Cannot connect to serverName===================================Arithmetic operation resulted in an overflow. (System.Data)------------------------------Program Location: at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ConsumePreLoginHandshake(Boolean encrypt, Boolean trustServerCert, Boolean& marsCapable) at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Connect(ServerInfo serverInfo, SqlInternalConnectionTds connHandler, Boolean ignoreSniOpenTimeout, Int64 timerExpire, Boolean encrypt, Boolean trustServerCert, Boolean integratedSecurity, SqlConnection owningObject) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.AttemptOneLogin(ServerInfo serverInfo, String newPassword, Boolean ignoreSniOpenTimeout, Int64 timerExpire, SqlConnection owningObject) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.LoginNoFailover(String host, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance, SqlConnection owningObject, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, Int64 timerStart) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.OpenLoginEnlist(SqlConnection owningObject, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds..ctor(DbConnectionPoolIdentity identity, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, Object providerInfo, String newPassword, SqlConnection owningObject, Boolean redirectedUserInstance) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionFactory.CreateConnection(DbConnectionOptions options, Object poolGroupProviderInfo, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnection owningConnection) at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.CreateNonPooledConnection(DbConnection owningConnection, DbConnectionPoolGroup poolGroup) at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.VSIntegration.ObjectExplorer.ObjectExplorer.ValidateConnection(UIConnectionInfo ci, IServerType server) at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.ConnectionDlg.Connector.ConnectionThreadUser()
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhen I run the following sql query:
"update table set price = price * 1.1 "..
I get the following error : "Msg 8115, Level 16, State 8, Line 1.. Arithmetic overflow error converting nvarchar to data type numeric. The statement has been terminated."
The table is set to nvarchar, and i am just trying to make the prices go up 10%.
OK, so I have this query where I'm trying to subtract values like this, when I do this I am getting (Arithmetic overflow error converting varchar to data type numeric.) I have tried many different things, and now of these work, it'll either return 0 because it loses the .XXXXX.
Convert(DECIMAL(10,7),CAST([TIME_OF_COMPLETION] as DECIMAL(10,7)) - Convert(DECIMAL(10,7),CAST([OPR_DELIVERED_TIME] as DECIMAL(10,7)) round(cast(cast(hist.[TIME_OF_COMPLETION] AS float) as DECIMAL(15, 5)) - CAST(hist.[OPR_DELIVERED_TIME] AS FLOAT),1 SELECT convert(FLOAT,CAST('735509.00053' AS DECIMAL(10,5))) - convert(FLOAT,CAST('735509.00047' AS DECIMAL(10,5)))