I need to return 1 ip address for each machine. I can easily achieve this with using group by and return max(ipaddress) however I would like to filter out specific range '192.168.%' but only want to do that if machine has more then 1 ip address. If the machine has only 1 ip address then it can return it even if its '192.168.%'
below is test table to show sample data
CREATE TABLE dbo.[testip]( [machineid] INT NULL, [ipaddress] [varchar](20) NULL ) GO INSERT INTO [dbo].[testip] ([machineid],[ipaddress]) VALUES (1,'155.119.1.22') INSERT INTO [dbo].[testip] ([machineid],[ipaddress]) VALUES (1,'192.168.1.5')
Hi friendsI have little problem here.I am creating data tables dynamically.I want to filter it using sql query.Suppose, I have four data tables with the same structure but records may be different.There are two fields ServiceMethod and Rates.Now I want to filter all tables and want to get match records with the ServiceMethod.Suppose,four records in First table,three records in other three tables,and only two records(Service method) are same in all tables.I want to that two records by filtering all tables and sum of rates and want to add matched records in new table and bind dropdownlist.Can any guide me how to filter more than one tables using sql query if data tables are created dynamically?Thanks in advance.
In the full recovery model, if i run a transaction that inserts 10MB of data into a table, then 10 MB of data is moved in the data file. Does this mean then that the log file will grow by exactly 10MB as well?
I understand that all transactions are logged to the log file to enable rollback and point in time recovery, but what is actually physically stored in the log file for this transactions record? Is it the text of the command from the transaction or the actual physical data from that transaction?
I ask because say if I have two drives, one with 5MB/s write speed for the log file and one with 10MB/s write speed for the data file, if I start trying to insert 10 MB of data per second into the table, am I going to be limited to 5MB/s by the log file drive, or is SQL server not going to try and log all 10 MB each second to the log file?
If I have the total amount of 673000 that is passed as a parameter in my stored proc then, I need to do this:
Declare @TotalAmount money @TotalAmount = 673000 Col1 Col2 Col3 Test1 45 672955 --(I want to subtract 673000 from Col2 data) 673000-45 Test2 30 672925 --(I want to subtract 30 from the remaining amount of col3) Test3 100 672825 --(I want to subtract 100 from the remaining amount of col3)
I want to write a query that will give me a dynamic amount of columns back.What I want to do, I want to create a calendar application, in which foreach employee, I want to show if he is in the office or not.this should look like:ID, Name, 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,888,Leo,0,0,1,1,1,0,0,1The amount of columns is dynamic, and is a period of time, with a column foreach day.Any suggestions what the best approach to this could be?ThanksLeo
Not nice but a work around: is there a way to get the amount of fields or rows from a table or query within MS SQL, to pick out the lastfield-4 for example ?
I have a query that returns a result that looks like this:
amount count steve 122000 12 jim 145213 13 paul 62325 7
I need to add 2 columns to this query that rank the employees by count and amount with a number, so for example:
amount amount_rank count count_rank steve 122000 2 12 2 jim 145213 1 13 1 paul 62325 3 7 3
I was going to paste the entire query in but I thought I'd try this first to see if I could get by with a hint. So essentially I need to evaluate with an order by or something and then insert a number as amount_rank and number as count_rank.
Hi all - struggling a bit with this one... I have made an accounts application and need to make a report called "Aged Debtors". It lists all of the clients with outstanding invoices and breaks them down into periods:
current (this month) period 1 (last month) period 2 (2 months ago) period 4 (invoices raised 3 months ago or more)
My tables are as follows (simplified)
Clients clientid int clientname varchar(100)
invoices invoiceid int clientid int invoicedate datetime cinvoiceamount decimal(19,2) paid int (1 = paid, 0 = unpaid) paidamount decimal(19,2) (how much of this invoice has been paid)
I need the following columns in the report
clientname invoiceid current period1 period2 period3+ test client 1 £100 - - - 2 £50 - - - 3 - £100 - - test client2
I can format all the report using a matrix in SSRS so just need the stored proc to get me going - any help greatly appreciated! Thanks guys, Stephen.
Hy im PCV I want to know how to calculate the amount of data(in MB) that is transfered from 1 server trought another Puplisher--->Subscriber, using a merge replication. I know that the amount of data depends on the number of the rows and the scale of the colums. I only want to know how to calculate that amount of data. I am using Sql server 2000, and a OS windows XP profesional, thank you
I'm creating a temporary table in a Sql 2005 stored procedure that contains the transaction amount entered in a period <= the period the user enters. I can return that amount in my result set. But I also need to separate out by account the amounts just in the period = the period the user enters. There can be many entries or no entries in any period. I populate the temporary table this way:
SELECT t.gl7accountsid, a.accountnumber, a.description, a.category, t.POSTDATE, t.poststatus, t.TRANSACTIONTYPE, t.AMOUNT, case when t.transactiontype=2 then amount * (-1) else amount end as transamount, t.ENCUMBRANCESTATUS, t.gl7fiscalperiodsid
FROM UrsinusCollege.dbo.gl7accounts a
join ursinuscollege.dbo.gl7transactions t on a.gl7accountsid=t.gl7accountsid
where (t.gl7fiscalperiodsid >= 97 And t.gl7fiscalperiodsid<=@FiscalPeriod_identifier) And poststatus in (2,3) and left(a.accountnumber,5) between '2-110' and '2-999' And right(a.accountnumber,4) > 7149 And not(right(a.accountnumber,4)) in ('7171','7897')
order by a.accountnumber
Later I create a temporary table that contains budget information. I join these 2 temporary tables to produce my result set. But I don't know how to get the information for just one period. For example, if the user enters 99 as the FiscalPeriod_identifier, I need a separate field that contains only those amounts(if any) that were entered for each account in Period 99.
Can anyone help? It may be that I am not seeing the forest for the trees, but I can't figure it out.
Hi,I've an application, lets call it simply "A", which creates in a Microsoft Sql Database two huge tables.Lets call them "table1" and "table2"It safes really much data into this tables.After application "A" has finished another application is executed which deletes this two tables.Then application "A" is started again and it will create this two tables again, but the amount of data becomes bigger.It can only proceed if the tables were deleted completely before and the database is empty. This is the procedure which I repeat very often, but everytime the amount of data becomes bigger (table1 and table2 becomes bigger).A couple if times it works fine, but once it seems data becomes too big and application "A" fails. Mostlikely because the data wasnt removed correctly / completely. This is my code of deleting the two tables, maybee there is something I have to change:</p><p> try { SqlConnectionStringBuilder builder = new SqlConnectionStringBuilder("Server=mycomputerdbname;Integrated Security=SSPI;" + "Initial Catalog=testing"); builder["Server"] = "(local)dbname"; builder["Connect Timeout"] = 10; builder["Trusted_Connection"] = true; builder["Initial Catalog"] = ((ComponentConfiguration)this.componentConfig).Persistency.DatabaseName; SqlConnection sqlconnection = new SqlConnection(); sqlconnection.ConnectionString = builder.ConnectionString; sqlconnection.Open(); SqlCommand cmd1 = new SqlCommand("DROP TABLE table1"); // TO Do delete all tables SqlCommand cmd2 = new SqlCommand("DROP TABLE table2"); // TO Do delete all tables cmd1.Connection = sqlconnection; cmd2.Connection = sqlconnection; cmd1.ExecuteNonQuery(); Thread.Sleep(7000); cmd2.ExecuteNonQuery(); Thread.Sleep(7000); sqlconnection.Close(); Thread.Sleep(3000); } catch { }</p><p> </p><p> Thanks for help! mulata
i have just created a test database and now need to insert a large number of records into one of the tables, we were thinking of about 1 million records, has anyone got an sql script that i could use to create these records
I need to make a job that will update up to 8000 rows with the list description of 'berkhold' to 'berknew' in SQL 2000. This is something that I have to do with several projects manually every day by doing the following 2 steps.
SELECT ListDescription, CRRecordID FROM dbo_BerkleyGroupInventory WHERE ListDescription ="BerkHold" AND CRCallDateTime<'1/1/2003' AND CRCallResultCode ='CC' ORDER BY CRRecordID
I then scroll to the 8000th row and copy the CrrecordID and run the following query
UPDATE dbo.berkleygroupinventory SET listdescription ='berknew' WHERE ListDescription ='BerkHold' AND CRRecordID <=5968432 AND CRCallDateTime ='1/1/2003' AND CRCallResultCode='CC'
I'm sure there's an easier way to do this, but I'm very new to SQL and haven't figured it out yet
This is a general question on the best way to import a large amount of datato a MS-SQL DB.I can have the data in just about any format I need to, I just don't knowhow to import the data. I some experience with SQL but not much.There is about 1500 to 2000 lines of data. I am looking for the best way toget this amount of data in on a monthly basis.Any help is greatly thanked!!Mike Charney
I need to delete data from a particular table which has more than half a million records. The data needs to be deleted is more than 200,000 records from the table. What is the best way to delete the data from the table other than importing into a temporary table and performing the same operation?
Let me know if the strategy to be followed is okay.
1. Drop all the triggers 2. Drop all the indexes 3. Write a procedure with a loop setting ROWCOUNT to 1000 and delete the records. ( since if I try to delete all the rows it will give timeout error ) The above procedure will delete 1000 records for each batch inside the loop till it wipes out all the data for the specified condition. 4. Recreate Indexes and Triggers.
Please let me know if there are any other optimal solution.
Hi,I am using SQL 2000 and has a table that contains more than 2 millionrows of data (and growing). Right now, I have encountered 2 problems:1) Sometimes, when I try to query against this table, I would get sqlcommand time out. Hence, I did more testing with Query Analyser and tofind out that the same queries would not always take about the sametime to be executed. Could anyone please tell me what would affect thespeed of the query and what is the most important thing among all thefactors? (I could think of the opened connections, server'sCPU/Memory...)2) I am not sure if 2 million rows is considered a lot or not, however,it start to take 5~10 seconds for me to finish some simple queries. Iam wondering what is the best practices to handle this amount of datawhile having a decent performance?Thank you,Charlie Chang[Charlies224@hotmail.com]
I have SQL 2000 and need to retrieve fairly large amout of data (~50.000 characters) in XML format and then insert it into the field ofthe text type.As 'FOR XML' can't be used with either local variables, INSERT INTO orSELECT INTO this makes "XML support" quite useless in many aspects.Can anyone please help me in solving this.Thanks a lot for your help and time.Pavel
i need to retrieve a large amount of data from the sql server database and make changes to one field and put the data back using a console application. how do i do it?
Hi, My application needs to retrieve data from a table which has more than 15 lakh records. The records keep increasing in thousands every 15 days. Is there anyway i can reduce the time to retrieve? basically i have a select statement with a few conditions and a clause for the id's of these records.
I created a package getting data from files and database sources, doing some transformations, retrieving dimension id's and then inserting it into a fact table.
Running this package with a limited amount of data (about a couple of 100.000 records) does not result in any errors and everything goes fine.
Now running the same package (still in debug mode) with more data (about 2.000.000 rows) doesn't result in any errors as well, but it just stops running. In fact, it doesn't really stop, but it doesn't continue as well. If I've only been waiting for some minutes or hours, I could think it's still processing, but I waited for about a day and it still is 'processing' the same step.
Any ideas on how to dig further into this in order to find the problem? Or is this a known problem?
We have several database linked via merge replications. Due to business requirements, we need to delete 5M rows in one table, we did it on one subscriber. However, the publisher kept uploading the deletion operations from the subscriber and blocked any downloading operation from publisher to subscriber. How can we acceralte the replications now as this has already operated in 2 days, and will continue 1-2 days? Is it possible to set the publisher take the downloading before uploading? How to speed up large amount data deletion operations in replication environment?
I have an interesting challenge. we are not allowed to allow users direct access to data in our SQL Server. Audit requires us to take the data out of our production server and pass it to the user. my situation is i have a table in SQl with over 100,000 records and growing. i want to pass that to an access data base. i am utilizing DTS and a data transform.
i s there a better way? the package is running slow and even appears to freeze. i see this amount of data as growing as well.
Recently we added a new table into our SQL2000 database specifically to store scanned in images of documents. This new table contains a PK field, a couple of datetime fields, a couple of char(1) fields and one 'image' field.
Before adding this table, the database size was approx 6GB. Six months after adding this new table, the database has grown to 18GB - 11GB of this is due to the scanned in images.
Would this new table affect the SQL performance with regards to accessing other data in the database that has nothing related to the new table?
If so, would moving this new table into it's own database be recommended?
I am trying to add a field (bank_chk_amt] from a table in to my query to bring in a dollar amount....I originally had this below
SELECT dbo.CBPAYMENT.REFERENCE_NO, 'CCMCCHBREF' AS Literal, RTrim([description]) + ', ' + [bank_chk_amt] + ', ' + convert(char(10),[check_date],101) + ', ' + 'Refund check sent to ' + [payee_name] AS [Free Text] FROM dbo.CBPAYMENT;
but I would get "Error converting data type varchar to numeric".So my co-worker modified it and added (str([bank_chk_amt]) to my query which worked, but I noticed it dropped of the cents. So instead of 80.35 it would show 80 And I noticed it rounded 100.50 to 101...How can I bring in the full dollar amount and without adding?
I have a problem at pulling data on PDA using Sql Mobile 5 from Sql Server 2000.
It work s for most tables, except for two . Every table of those two has about 1000 records and every record about 150 bytes, so all data is about 150 kbytes.
When I connect to the Sql Server 2000 through LAN, no problem. But when I connect through GPRS - VPN, the error occurs. But, the PDA- phone connection is via Bluetooth and at ping no TimeOut appears, the replies are about 600-700 ms. When connecting with a desktop computer through GPRS no such problem occurs.
So , I don't know what could be the cause: the connection or the Sql Mobile which doesn't retry enough in case of error to transfer all data .
A specialist from the GPRS provider told me to use 3G phone , but , because the GPRS phones have already been bought, this would be a too big investment. So, I don't think this is a good idea in this moment .
I found similar problem on the net and a solution was to use Pooling = False. But , in Sql Mobile there is no pulling parameter available when making the connection string .
I have a table named Prescription that consists of attributes like PatientId, MedicineCode, MedicineName, Prices of different drugs, quantity of different drugs(e.g 1,2,3,10), date .
I would like to get a summary of the total number and amount of different drugs in a specific period, the total amount of each type of drug.
Currently - we have two-node A/P cluster residing on flash array. Need to leverage AlwaysOn to offload processing. Replica server with have Flash storage. Replica node has same CPU and memory footprint. 10GB connection between nodes. Anyone generating such large transaction log for 15/30 minute time period?
I have a combo box where users select the customer name and can eithergo to the customer's info or open a list of the customer's orders.The RowSource for the combo box was a simple pass-through query:SELECT DISTINCT [Customer ID], [Company Name], [contact name],City,Region FROM Customers ORDER BY Customers.[Company Name];This was working fine until a couple of weeks ago. Now wheneversomeone has the form open, this statement locks the entire Customerstable.I thought a pass-through query was read-only, so how does this do atable lock?I changed the code to an unbound rowsource that asks for input of thefirst few characters first, then uses this SQL statement as therowsource:SELECT [Customer ID], [Company Name], [contact name],City, Region Fromdbo_Customers WHERE [Company Name] like '" & txtInput & "*' ORDER BY[Company Name];This helps, but if someone types only one letter, it could still bepulling a few thousand records and cause a table lock.What is the best way to populate a large combo box? I have too muchdata for the ADODB recordset to use the .AddItem methodI was trying to figure out how to use an ADODB connection, so that Ican make it read-only to eliminate the locking, but I'm striking outon my own.Any ideas would be appreciated.Roy(Using Access 2003 MDB with SQL Server 2000 back end)
I'm an MDX newbie.. with some help I was able to create a query that returns accurate results. All I need to do now is filter for Completed Work value of greater than 0.
I have tried to use the filter wizard in VS2005, but I have never gotten the desired results.
Platform Info: SQL Server 2005 Standard VS2005
---------Start Statement---------------------------------------------------------- WITH
MEMBER [Measures].[Completed Work by WI on dt1] AS
