In SQL sERVER 2008, I have two fields - Depatment and Employees. I need to sort the result set by employee number ascending order, with following exception
1)when department number = 50 - the preferred order is Employee # - 573 followed by 551-572 (employee # belong to Dept 50 = 551-573)
2)When Department number = 20 – the preferred sort order is Employee # 213-220, followed by Employee # 201-213 (employee # belong to Dept 20 = 201-220)
on executing the below query i am getting the following error
ERROR: Errors in the back-end database access module. Nested table keys in a SHAPE query must be sorted in the same order as the parent table. The nested query may be missing an ORDER BY clause.
even though the order by clause is presenet in the nested query
SELECT t.[ProductId], Predict ([Association].[Product Basket],3) From [Association] PREDICTION JOIN SHAPE { OPENQUERY([Adventure Works Cycle MSCRM], 'SELECT DISTINCT [ProductId] FROM (SELECT ProductId FROM ProductBase) as [Product] ORDER BY [ProductId]')} APPEND ({OPENQUERY([Adventure Works Cycle MSCRM], 'SELECT [ProductId] FROM (SELECT ProductId FROM ProductBase) as [Product] ORDER BY [ProductId]')} RELATE [ProductId] To [ProductId] ) AS [Product] AS t ON [Association].[Product Id] = t.[ProductId] AND [Association].[Product Basket].[Product Id] = t.[Product].[ProductId]
Hello,I need to write a query to find out a set of missing number in a givensequence.Eg : a Column in some table has the following dataCol11234568910Here I need to write a query to find out that number 7 is missing in thegiven sequence.One possible solution is by using any loop. But I am looking out if the samecan be achieved using any query.Thanks in advance.Regards,Mahesh
Lets say I have a table named [Leadership] and I want to select the field 'leadershipName' from the [Leadership] Table.
My query would look something like this:
Select leadershipName From Leadership
Now, I would like to order the results of this query... but I don't want to simply order them by ASC or DESC. Instead, I need to order them as follows:
Executive Board Members, Delegates, Grievance Chairs, and Negotiators
My question: Can this be done through MS SQL or do I need to add a field to my [Leadership] table named 'leadershipImportance' or something as an integer to denote the level of importance of the position so that I can order on that value ASC or DESC?
I saw a previous request for help, but I did not see a solution (other than deleting and re-initializing the dump.
I'm copying a database from one server to another and I repetedly get this error when I try to restore from the .bak file I create on backup. The host machine for the database is a workstation (no RAID). The Destination does have RAID, but is funtioning properly (according to the SysOps and in testing file copies). I've tried copying the .bak file to several different drives several different times and I get the same error. I also tried to back-up a database on the Destination server and restore the .bak file to a newly created database and I get the same error.
I have a transaction number in my mapping table. I have a matching transaction number in my PDHist table. Sometimes I have matching transaction numbers in my PD table, but not always. This is causing no records to be returned. I have a One to Many relationship between my mapping table and both PD and PDHist.
Also, I need to check for nulls in my foreign exchange table.I can’t post the SQL because this is a classified project. However, it should be something like this, I think.
declare @NumberToCompareTo int set @NumberToCompareTo = 8 declare @table table ( number int ) insert into @table select 4
[Code] ....
The query selects 4 and 5 of course. Now what I'm looking for is to retrieve the number less or equal to @NumberToCompareTo, I mean the most immediate less number than the parameter. So in this case 5
I want to retrieve data from SQL server database table I also want to get the order number of each record also For example consider the following table I want to get one (1) associated with A, Two (2) associated with B Three (3) associated with E Name Mark A 10 B 9 E 10 How can I do this? I want to retrieve data from SQL server database table
I want to get the order number of each record also
For example consider the following table
I want to get one
Name Mark A 10 B 9 E 10
(1) associated with A,
Two (2) associated with B Three (3) associated with E
I am wanting to set up a trigger on our SQL server 2000 to create a sequential order line number in the OrderDetails table for OrderID.
I will be inserting data from an OrderLinesAdd table into the OrderLines table but want the LineNumber field to be incremented by 1 for each group of orders grouped by OrderID that I insert into the table eg.
I have just started using SQL so am not sure how I go about writing the code for the trigger ? It would seem like I will need to use the Max function in the code.
I have a table of transaction that includes student ids and dates. I need to select all records from the table and include a new value that is the sequential transaction numbered for each student with the oldest transaction for each student being numbered one, the next oldest numbered two and so on. So the result should look like student1, 10/1/2000, 1, student1, 10/15/2000, 2, student1, 2/12/2001, 3, student2, 9/1/1999, 1, student2 10/2/2000, 2, student2 , 12/15/2000, 3, student2, 11/4/2001, 4 and so on.
I'm doing a INSERT...SELECT where I'm dependent on the records SELECT:ed to be in a certain order. This order is enforced through a clustered index on that table - I can see that they are in the proper order by doing just the SELECT part.
However, when I do the INSERT, it doesn't work (nothing is inserted) - can the order of the records from the SELECT part be changed internally on their way to the INSERT part, so to speak?
Actually - it is a view that I'm inserting into, and there's an instead-of-insert trigger on it that does the actual insertions into the base table. I've added a "PRINT" statement to the trigger code and there's just ONE record printed (there should be millions).
I need to find the missing months in a table for the earliest and latest start dates per ID_No.  As an example:
create table #InputTable (ID_No int ,OccurMonth datetime) insert into #InputTable (ID_No,OccurMonth)Â select 10, '2007-11-01' Union all select 10, '2007-12-01' Union all select 10, '2008-01-01' Union all select 20, '2009-01-01' Union all select 20, '2009-02-01' Union all select 20, '2009-04-01' Union all select 30, '2010-05-01' Union all select 30, '2010-08-01' Union all select 30, '2010-09-01' Union all select 40, '2008-03-01'
This procedure has been returning duplicate numbers. (Tested with scripts that called this proc and put value in a table.)
How can it return duplicates? Does the transaction Begin/Commit not guarantee transactional consistency?
CREATE PROCEDURE sp_UpdateOrderNumber @customer int AS DECLARE @NewOrderId int, @nSQLError int, @nRowCount int BEGIN TRAN UPDATE CUSTOMERS SET ORDER_NUMBER=ORDER_NUMBER + 1 WHERE COMPANY_ID=@customer SELECT@nSQLError = @@error, @nRowCount = @@rowcount If @nSQLError != 0 OR @nRowCount != 1 /* Check for Errors */ Begin Rollback Tran Return -999 End SELECTORDER_NUMBER FROMCUSTOMERS WHERECOMPANY_ID=@customer SELECT@nSQLError = @@error, @nRowCount = @@rowcount If @nSQLError != 0 OR @nRowCount != 1 /* Check for Errors */ Begin Rollback Tran Return -998 End COMMIT TRAN
The select command below will output one patient’s information in 1 row:
Patient id Last name First name Address 1 OP Coverage Plan 1 OP Policy # 1 OP Coverage Plan 2
[code]...
This works great if there is at least one OP coverage.  There are 3 tables in which to get information which are the patient table, the coverage table, and the coverage history table.  The coverage table links to the patient table via pat_id and it tells me the patient's coverage plan and in which priority to bill.  The coverage history table links to the patient and coverage table via patient id and coverage plan and it gives me the effective date. Â
select src.pat_id, lname, fname, addr1, max(case when rn = 1 then src.coverage_plan_ end) as OP_Coverage1, max(case when rn = 1 then src.policy_id end) as OP_Policy1,
We are having trouble figuring out how to create a view for this scenario:
We have a status log table that holds an order number, statusdatetime, and statuscode. This table will have multiple status' for the same order number. I want to create a view that will give me the most current status (by statusdatetime) of each order number. This view would show: order number, statusdatetime, and statuscode.
In sql 2000 one could right-click a table (under Enterprise Manager) and have it return the "top n" rows in the table. That feature seems to be missing from Management Studio. Am I correct or is it just hiding somewhere?
Greetings,If I use a "select into" to clone a table, all attributes are createdcorrectly, however, if I use the same statement across a linked server,my identity column loses its IDENTITY specification.Is this a known issue or basic functionality of using "select into"with linked servers?Kurt
If I return top 25 with an order by, will it get the whole result then take top 25 and order it or will it just return the first 25 it finds and order it. select top 25 c.firstname, c.lastname, o.units, o.partnum from customer c inner join orders o on c.key = o.key where o.units > 500 order by partnum
I have a Microsoft SQL Server 7.0.I wrote a sql command that creates a temporary table with a ORDER BYclause.When a execute a SELECT on this temporary table sometimes the result isok, but sometimes is not ordered. I didn´t see anything like that. Anyclue?Is there any kind of limits with temporary tables ? Because the commandthat creates the temporary table is working and the rsults is alwaysordered. But when I create a table with it, sometimes the table is notordered.Paulo*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
i have 2 selects:select * from view_veiculos where nome_marc like '%fiat%' and ano='2001'union select * from view_veiculos where nome_marc like '%fiat%'when i execute it on sql server, i get the following results:id 1 _______ ano 2004id 2 _______ ano 2001the row with ano 2004 is before the row with ano 2001the problem is that id like it to be ordered following the select order, which means that 2001 should be displayed before 2004,like that:id 1 _______ ano 2001id 2 _______ ano 2004all the results from the first select from the query need to be placed before the results from the second query.how can i make it ?thanks for all
Hi I have a query which returns some rows.. what happens if i use a select distinct instead of a select.. this is my sproc DECLARE @Counter TABLE( PlanId int, FundId int, ClientFundName varchar(110), DisplayOrder int IDENTITY(1,1), IsDefault bit, IsPortfolioFundOnly bit ) INSERT INTO @Counter ( PlanId, FundId, ClientFundName, IsDefault, IsPortfolioFundOnly ) SELECT 5923, f.FundId, d.FundName, CASE WHEN d.FundDefault IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE 1 END, CASE WHEN Lower(p.FundType) = 'modfundonly' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END FROM PlanDetail d INNER JOIN Statements..Fund f ON d.CUSIP = f.CUSIP OR d.Ticker = f.Ticker OR d.Ticker = f.ClientFundId OR d.CUSIP = f.ClientFundId -- Do an internal join on the PlanDetail table to get the value of the FundType to derive whether --fund can only be chosen as part of a portfolio. LEFT JOIN PlanDetail p ON d.FundName = p.FundName AND d.PortfolioName = p.PortfolioName WHERE d.PlanNumber IS NOT NULL AND p.PortFundPercent IS NULL GROUP BY f.FundId, d.FundName, d.FundDefault, --d.PlanNumber, --d.Cusip, -- d.Ticker, --d.RowNumber, p.FundType
I get the "ORDER BY items must appear in the select list if SELECT DISTINCT is specified.
SELECT DISTINCT pdm.Account, pdm.Customer FROM dbo.Demands pdm LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.Tickets rct ON pdm.Account = rct.Account WHERE pdm.Code IN (66, 51) ORDER BY pdm.TransactionDate DESC
Is there any way to make the ORDER BY work in this case?
I have table called 'UserDetails'. If I execute below select query it should display in order of uno= 7,13,5 but i get in order of
uno=5,7,13.
How to get in order of uno= 7,13,5
Select EmailAddress,EmployeeName,UNo, MobileNumber from UserDetails where (UNo=7 or UNo=13 or UNo=5 ) group by uno,emailaddress,employeename,uno,mobilenumber
Result I am getting as
EmailAddress EmployeeName UNo MobileNumber ----------------------------------------------------------- aaa@xxx.com ravi 5 8989898989 bbb@xxx.comramesh 79898989898 ariv@gmail.com arivu 13 8989898989
If i have two identical queries, with exception of top criteriaSelect top 1 * from photosSelect top 8 * from photoswhy does altering the top critieria alter the order of the returnedresults?
I have the following basic statements being executed:Create a temp table, #TempPagingInsert Into #TempPaging (Col1, Col2)Select Col1, Col2 From SomeOtherTable Order By Col2, Col1Select * from #TempPagingI can't provide a reproduceable scenario right now without making thisinto a 200K post, so I'm hoping someone will know what the issue is.. Ican't find anything regarding this in BOL.Basically the order is off a little bit every now and then when thereare large amounts of data, like more than a couple hundred rows. Isthere something I need to do to guarantee the originally selectedorder?This is very important that it be in order from the original selectstatement as this is for paging. Adding an order by in the secondselect from the temp table will not fix the problem. In this particularinstance that I have reproduced we are using SQL 2005 but have alsoseen this on SQL 2000 servers. I had previously asked this question asI was using a SELECT INTO statement, but now we are manually creatingthe temp table (Pain in the ass) and still having the same issue. Bestcase scenario is for it to work for a SELECT INTO.Any ideas?
Which is more efficientWhere NonindexedColumn=x and IndexedColumn=yorWhere IndexedColumn=y and NonindexedColumn=xor does matter? Will the optimiser work it out?(I'm building the SQL string on the fly in the fron-end)
Dear GroupI wonder whether you can push me in a direction on how to design thefollowing statement. I'm looking for a SELECT with some tricky ORDERBY.The database table looks like this:MenuID TabText SubTabID TabOrderID------- ----------- ----------- -----------1 Main 0 12 Cars 0 23 Boats 0 34 Planes 0 45 Pick-Ups 2 16 Campers 2 2The result should look like this:MainCarsPick-UpsCampersBoatsPlanesNotice that 'Pick-Ups' and 'Campers' are a subcategory of 'Cars' andmust appear in the result directly following 'Cars'.In more detail:'Main', 'Cars', 'Boats' and 'Planes' are top-level categories and'Pick-Ups' and 'Campers' are subcategories of 'Cars'. The SubTabIDvalue of an item identifies to what top-level category a subcategorybelongs.The TabOrderID specifies in what order the items should be sorted,e.g. 'Pick-Ups' comes first and 'Campers' second.Thanks very much for your help & efforts!Martin
I have two tables I selecting name using like with %string% from the two tables but I need to order the result comes from the two table: 1- the exact match for the search string come first from the two table. 2- and the partial match comes last after the exact match.
this is my DDL for the two tables :
USE [Northwind] GO /****** Object: Table [dbo].[Person] Script Date: 04/25/2008 14:33:24 ******/ SET ANSI_NULLS ON GO SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON GO SET ANSI_PADDING ON GO CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Person]( [PersonID] [int] NULL, [Type] [char](10) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL, [Name] [varchar](50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL, [email] [varchar](50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL ) ON [PRIMARY]
GO SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
second table: USE [Northwind] GO /****** Object: Table [dbo].[Members] Script Date: 04/25/2008 14:33:52 ******/ SET ANSI_NULLS ON GO SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON GO SET ANSI_PADDING ON GO CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Members]( [MemberID] [int] NULL, [Type] [char](10) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL, [Name] [varchar](50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL, [Email] [varchar](50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL ) ON [PRIMARY] GO SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
and this my search query I have it in a stored Proc.
select *
from
(
SELECT PersonID, Type, Name, email
FROM Person WHERE (Name LIKE '%'@Name'%') union all
