How To Specify A Row Filter On Joined Tables
Dec 7, 2006
I am using SQL Server 2005 to publish joined tables for SQL Mobile subscribers for merge replication and column level tracking.
Using Management Studio I am trying to join tables and specify row filters on the joined tables. I.E. table 1 is joined with table 2. I need to define row filters for table 1 and row filters specific to table 2.
An example would be: Table 1 is a customer table that I filter on a specific customer. Table 2 might be an orders table that I need to join to get the customers orders but I also want to filter for open orders only.
When I specify the row filter for table 2 the join appears to be ignored and I receive the complete table 2 with the row filter applied.
I have searched the online books and the web and I have not run accross an example of using both joins and row filters where the filters are specified for both joined tables.
Is this possible via the Management Studio?
Thanks,
Ron
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 15, 2002
Hi all -
Heres the deal,
I have six tables that are loosly related,
four in one join, two in the other....
in the first join there is a column called commentID -
and is based on a join of the four tables, the results of the
query is based on a where clause
and this needs to be tied into the second set of joined
tables (they are joined on a commentID themselves)
I have both the queries and joins working -
The primary query (4 joined tables) needs to do a lookup on the second (2 joined tables) and add its selected value, into the final result set....
thanks a million for the help!!
take care
tony
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2008
I posted Wednesday thinking a SELECT Distinct would solve my problem but it didn't. I have a stored procedure that is used to grab data from 4 tables that I need to join.
The 1st table (Application) holds a job applicant's name and some other data
The 2nd table (Jobs) holds the Job name and test type
The 3rd table (Locations) holds the locations
Then there is a foreign key many to many table (Application_Locations) that holds the applicants UserID and a LocationID. This table may have multiple rows for the same applicant with different locations in each row.
When the procedure is ran I want all the data that I am requesting from the Application table, and all the data that I am requesting from the Jobs table but only the 1st returned result of the Join on the Locations and Application_Locations table. What do I need to do to correct this so that I only display 1 row for each UserID no matter how many locations thay may have applied to. (You will notice that there are some IF statements so only the 2nd and 4th queries in the sproc are the ones that apply )
Here is the SPROC that is currently in place but is displaying a row for each location.
CREATE PROCEDURE sp_AdminListApplicants
@LocationID int,
@FolderID smallint,
@JobID int,
@SortOrder char(1)
AS
IF @JobID <> 9999
BEGIN
IF @LocationID <> 9999
BEGIN
SELECT
A.UserID,
A.Completed,
A.FolderID,
A.AppDateTimeStart,
A.ResumeFileName,
A.FirstName,
A.LastName,
A.PrescreenScore,
A.JobID,
A.ViewPre,
A.ViewApp,
A.ViewReport,
A.ViewResume,
J.JobTitle,
J.TestType,
L.BranchAbbreviation,
AL.LocationID
FROM
Locations L
INNER JOIN Application_Locations AL ON AL.LocationID = L.LocationID
INNER JOIN Application A ON AL.UserID = A.UserID
INNER JOIN Jobs J ON J.JobID = A.JobID
WHERE
AL.LocationID= @LocationID
AND A.FolderID= @FolderID
AND A.JobID = @JobID
ORDER BY
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '4' THEN A.AppDateTimeStart
END DESC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '6' THEN A.PreScreenScore
END DESC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '2' THEN A.LastName
END DESC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '5' THEN A.PreScreenScore
END ASC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '3' THEN A.AppDateTimeStart
END ASC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '1' THEN A.LastName
END ASC
END
ELSE
BEGIN
SELECT
A.UserID,
A.Completed,
A.FolderID,
A.AppDateTimeStart,
A.ResumeFileName,
A.FirstName,
A.LastName,
A.PrescreenScore,
A.JobID,
A.ViewPre,
A.ViewApp,
A.ViewReport,
A.ViewResume,
J.JobTitle,
J.TestType,
L.BranchAbbreviation,
AL.LocationID
FROM
Locations L
INNER JOIN Application_Locations AL ON AL.LocationID = L.LocationID
INNER JOIN Application A ON AL.UserID = A.UserID
INNER JOIN Jobs J ON J.JobID = A.JobID
WHERE
A.FolderID= @FolderID
AND A.JobID = @JobID
ORDER BY
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '4' THEN A.AppDateTimeStart
END DESC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '6' THEN A.PreScreenScore
END DESC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '2' THEN A.LastName
END DESC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '5' THEN A.PreScreenScore
END ASC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '3' THEN A.AppDateTimeStart
END ASC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '1' THEN A.LastName
END ASC
END
END
ELSE
BEGIN
IF @LocationID <> 9999
BEGIN
SELECT
A.UserID,
A.Completed,
A.FolderID,
A.AppDateTimeStart,
A.ResumeFileName,
A.FirstName,
A.LastName,
A.PrescreenScore,
A.JobID,
A.ViewPre,
A.ViewApp,
A.ViewReport,
A.ViewResume,
J.JobTitle,
J.TestType,
L.BranchAbbreviation,
AL.LocationID
FROM
Locations L
INNER JOIN Application_Locations AL ON AL.LocationID = L.LocationID
INNER JOIN Application A ON AL.UserID = A.UserID
INNER JOIN Jobs J ON J.JobID = A.JobID
WHERE
AL.LocationID= @LocationID
AND A.FolderID= @FolderID
ORDER BY
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '4' THEN A.AppDateTimeStart
END DESC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '6' THEN A.PreScreenScore
END DESC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '2' THEN A.LastName
END DESC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '5' THEN A.PreScreenScore
END ASC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '3' THEN A.AppDateTimeStart
END ASC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '1' THEN A.LastName
END ASC
END
ELSE
BEGIN
SELECT
A.UserID,
A.Completed,
A.FolderID,
A.AppDateTimeStart,
A.ResumeFileName,
A.FirstName,
A.LastName,
A.PrescreenScore,
A.JobID,
A.ViewPre,
A.ViewApp,
A.ViewReport,
A.ViewResume,
J.JobTitle,
J.TestType,
L.BranchAbbreviation,
AL.LocationID
FROM
Locations L
INNER JOIN Application_Locations AL ON AL.LocationID = L.LocationID
INNER JOIN Application A ON AL.UserID = A.UserID
INNER JOIN Jobs J ON J.JobID = A.JobID
WHERE
A.FolderID= @FolderID
ORDER BY
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '4' THEN A.AppDateTimeStart
END DESC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '6' THEN A.PreScreenScore
END DESC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '2' THEN A.LastName
END DESC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '5' THEN A.PreScreenScore
END ASC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '3' THEN A.AppDateTimeStart
END ASC,
CASE
WHEN @SortOrder = '1' THEN A.LastName
END ASC
END
END
GO
Miranda
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2006
Hi!
I have 4 tables inner joined. Two of tables have ~500,000 rows, while other 2 have ~60,000. There are 4-5 WHERE conditions for 3 tables.
Is it normal that a query lasts ~13-15 seconds? I tried indexing in all ways, subselects, temp tables etc, nothing helped.
I think it is unuseful to use indexes because WHERE conditions apply not to one, but to 3 tables.
Is there anyone who is expert in this topic?
Thanx
B
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 25, 2008
Hello, i have this problem
Table1
tbl1
pcb varchar(30)serial varchar(30)result varchar(30)
tbl2:
pcb varchar(30)date_time varchar(30)result varchar(30) data1 varchar(30)data2 varchar(30),
what i need is query the tbl1 for a range of serials,get the pcb and for those pcb's query the tbl2 for data1,data2
The resultSet should be a join on the two tables, Columns {serial} from tbl1 and {pcb,date_time,data1,data2} from tbl2
Please follow my simple example:
Suppose tbl1 has these 2 records
tbl1 = pcb1,sn1,pass
pcb2,sn2,pass
pcb3,sn3,pass
tbl2= pcb1,date1,pass,dataX1,dataY1
pcb1,date2,pass,dataX2,dataY2
pcb2,date3,pass,dataX3,dataY3
pcb3,date4,pass,dataX4,dataY4
pcb1,date5,pass,dataX5,dataY5
pcb2,date6,pass,dataX6,dataY6
where date1 is the most recent date and date6 the least recent
Request:what i want is for serial>=sn1 and serial<=sn2,get the pcbs from tbl1(which are pcb1 and pcb2) and based on these, query the tbl2
for the other data but retrieve only most recent records.
The correct ResultSet should be
pcb1,sn1,date1,dataX1,dataY1
pcb2,sn2,date3,dataX3,dataY3
and not
pcb1,date1,pass,dataX1,dataY1
pcb1,date2,pass,dataX2,dataY2
pcb1,date5,pass,dataX5,dataY5
pcb2,date3,pass,dataX3,dataY3
pcb2,date6,pass,dataX6,dataY6
What i already did is this:
select max(CONVERT(DATETIME,tbl2.date_time,103)),tbl1.serial,tbl2.pcb
from tbl2
left JOIN tbl1
ON tbl2.Pcb=tbl1.pcb
where tbl1.serial>='1' and tbl1.serial<='53'
and tbl2."Result" like 'pass' and tbl1."result" like 'pass'
group by tbl2.pcb,tbl1.serial;
This works correctly for getting serial from tbl1, date_time and pcb from tbl2.But unfortunately i also need data1 and data2 columns from tbl2.
If i include them in the Select Clause i have to include them also in the group by ,and this gives me also duplicate records (by using this OR philosophy).I mean, it would give all records containing (pcb1,pcb2),much like my example
How can i resolve this issue?
Thank you very much
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2008
I'm managing an amature online university and I've been charged with creating a deans list. I have a table for exam results for each course.. currently totaling 5. I have an employeeID column and a total_points column in each table. Sooooo I need to join all the tables and get an average for total_points where the employeeID matches across tables. I have no idea how to write this select.. any help?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2014
I have four tables (all inner joined) and currently they give me the results i need. However, my boss has now asked me to return all associated accounts as well.
I am currently pulling data from the four tables to make up my results table, and the returned results are based on the loan types in my loans tables having a loan type of '1A'
So if the loan type is 1A I get a result.
However, Mr Smith (for example) may have three loans but only one of them is type '1A'. The other two might be type '5H' and '2'.
What I need to be able to do is return all the associated accounts of any customer that has a type '1A' loan.
This is my code:
Select c.customernumber, l.accountsuffix, c.forename, c.surname, lt.code, l.balance, j.journeynumber from customers c
inner join loanagreements l on c.customerid = l.customerid
inner join loantypes lt on l.loantypeid = lt.loantypeid
inner join journeys j on c.journeyid = j.journeyid
Where j.journeynumber = 93
and lt.code = '1a'
and l.balance >0
View 6 Replies
View Related
Dec 8, 2005
I get a 90-120 second blocking when send 15 or so simultaneous queriesto SQL Server 2000 that query a view made up of two joined tables.After each query is blocking for the same amount of time they allreturn. Further identical queries of this type work in 3-4 seconds(caching?) until hours later where it happens again. If I query thetables directly (without the view) I still get the same blocking. If Iremove the join (it is a simple inner join on two columns) I do not getthe blocking.Any ideas?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 18, 2006
This seems like a very simple question but i have never been able tofind an easy answer to it.I have a user table and i do a join with another table, we'll call theother table a results table.The results table has numerous rows with the userid foreign key.I want to make a query that will give me the number of rows in theresults table for each user where the result is some valueThe query is simple to make but will only show the users who have arecord in the results table the meet the where criteria, however i wantto display each user and show a record count of 0 when there are noresults in the results table that match the criteria.for example i have 2 tables.tblUsers_______________userid | username--------------------------1 | user12 | user2tblAnswers________________userid | answer----------------------------1 | 11 | 01 | 42 | 12 | 0if i run the query:select max(username), count(answer) from tblUsersleft outer join tblanswers on tblAnswers.userid = tblUSers.idwhere tblAnswers.answer = 4group by tblUsers.idi just getuser1 | 1i want to getuser1 | 1user2 | 0the only way ive found to do this is with a temp table and a curser tocreate all the users records and go back through an insert the answercount for each user. This approach seems very expensive and requires aquery that is 3 times larger than is needed for the same resultswithout including 0 count records. I know there must be a better way todo this.Any help is appreciated.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2007
Hello,
I'm working on a query for a report. I've done this before and it works, but I think it's a little slow due to the joins and I'm wondering if I'm doing this the best way.
This is from a Microsoft CRM system. I'm only using the LEAD table. There is a field on the lead table called StateCode. When a user "Qualifies" a lead, the statecode changes. The report requires a column for total leads, a column for # of leads qualified, and a column for % of leads qualified. There are other columns, but those three will illustrate the problem.
Because total leads means all statecode values are included, and Qualified leads means only one statecode value is included, I can't get those two values from the same query (that I know of). So what I do is take two queries, one for total leads, and one for qualified leads, put them in parenthesis and name them, and then join them on the name of the leadsource, like below. I often end up with 10 or 15 of these "Query Tables" in my main query. Is this the best way?
Code Block
SELECT * FROM
(
SELECT
LeadSource
, COUNT(CreatedOn)
FROM
Leads
GROUP BY
LeadSource
) as A
LEFT OUTER JOIN
(
SELECT
LeadSource
, Count(CreatedOn)
, Count(CreatedOn) / (SELECT COUNT(CreatedOn) FROM leads) AS "% of Leads Qualified from this Lead Source"
FROM
Leads
WHERE
StateCode = 2
GROUP BY
LeadSource
) as B
ON
A.LeadSource = B.LeadSource
Thanks,
Andy
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 2, 2007
I have created the following view:
Create view vwOrderItemTotal2
AS
SELECT ItemName, fkMenuItemID, Sum(Quantity) as [SumOfMenuITems] FROM OrderItems GROUP BY fkMenuItemId, ItemName
When I present my data in a GridView, it works fine. For example, several orders for milk are returned as a summary quantity of 26 gallons in a single row of the GridView like this:
26 Milk
Now I need to filter my data by OrderDate and Zipcode. I created this new view:
Create view vwOrderItemTotal5
AS
SELECT Orders.Zipcode, Orders.OrderDate, OrderItems.ItemName, OrderItems.fkMenuItemID, Sum(Quantity) as [SumOfMenuITems]
FROM Orders INNER JOIN OrderItems
ON Orders.OrderID = OrderItems.fkOrderID
GROUP BY fkMenuItemId, ItemName, Zipcode, OrderDate
When I present my data in a Gridview using the new view I get a GridView with multiple rows for milk where each order has its own row like this:
1 Milk
5 Milk
6 Milk
6 Milk
3 Milk
1 Milk
4 Milk
But I want the data presentation in one row for each ItemName (e.g. Milk) as with my first view. Can I adjust my new view to achieve this, or should I stick with my first view (vwOrderItemTotal2) and adjust the Select Command in my SqlDataSource (hasn’t worked yet).
I think that what I want is for the returned data to be grouped by fkMenuItemId only, but the sql server admin won’t let me create a view without including the other fields in the Group By clause. Thanks for any help provided in solving this.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2008
I've read that if particular tables are frequently queried together through a join then these tables should be placed on different devices on different physical disks.
What does this mean exactly and how would you configure this?
Is this a common practice in high-performance real-world environments (or should it be)?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2008
Each row of my datagrid comes from two tables, A and B, which are (left) joined: not every row from table A has a corresponding row in table B. I think this is quite a common scenario.If I want to edit a row in my datagrid which contains data from both Table A and Table B then presumably I can just use an UPDATE statement behind the scenes.But what happens if I want to edit a particular row in the datagrid which contains data from Table A but no corresponding data from table B? I can't use an UPDATE statement because the record in Table B doesn't yet exist. So what do I do?Does anyone know the answer to this, or could you point me to a good tutorial please?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 30, 2013
I have a query written that filters on joined table data. The SELECT looks like this:
SELECT *
FROM tbl_bol AS a LEFT OUTER JOIN
bol_status AS b ON b.bol_status_id = a.bol_status_id LEFT OUTER JOIN
tbl_carrier AS c ON c.carrier_id = a.carrier_id
WHERE (a.carrier_name LIKE 'five%') AND
(a.accrueamt = 0) AND
(a.imported = 1) AND
(b.description = 'tendered') AND
(a.ship_date BETWEEN '9/1/13' AND '9/30/13')
ORDER BY a.bol_number DESC
If I want to do an UPDATE query that uses those filters in the WHERE clause, how do I go about doing that? It doesn't look like you can used joined tables in the UPDATE line like this:
UPDATE tbl_bol AS a LEFT OUTER JOIN
bol_status AS b ON b.bol_status_id = a.bol_status_id LEFT OUTER JOIN
tbl_carrier AS c ON c.carrier_id = a.carrier_id
SET accrueamt='1348'
WHERE (a.carrier_name LIKE 'five%') AND
(a.accrueamt = 0) AND
(a.imported = 1) AND
(b.description = 'tendered') AND
(a.ship_date BETWEEN '9/1/13' AND '9/30/13')
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2014
I joined different tables and got a result like this:
result | process | goal | date |
------- ---------- ------ -----------
ok | process4 | 1 | 12.10.2013
bad | process1 | 2 | 13.10.2013
ok | process1 | 4 | 12.12.2013
good | process4 | 1 | 03.01.2014
ok | process1 | 3 | 10.04.2013
bad | process3 | 6 | 09.01.2014
bad | process4 | 3 | 30.12.2013
best |NULL| NULL
Now I want to count the results by counting the processes and group them by the result.
But it should be count the latest result per process only, e.g. for goal "1" just "good" at 03.01.2014. I solved that with a subquery (date=SELECT MAX(...)..).
But now the result "best" disappears, because that column has no date.
Secondly I want to count results for a specific process, e.g. for process4. Every goal has max. one process, with different dates. But one process could have more than one goal.
I want to have this result for process4:
count | result
------ -------
1 | good
1 | bad
0 | ok
0 | best
But I got only:
count | result
------ -------
1 | good
1 | bad
I have tried a lot, but nothing works.
The whole result (best, good, ok, bad) are stored in an other table and I joined it.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 5, 2014
I have a query which returns all parts and labour lines for a particular work order. It returns all parts lines seperately, but the labour lines are repeated for each row. What I want to accomplish for a given work order, is a list of all the parts lines, followed underneath by a list of all labour lines.This is the code from the report:
select
h.worknumber,
--- Select parts lines and charges
wp.description as [charges desc],
case
when wp.charge_to_cust = 1 then wp.sale_price
[code]...
For this example what I'd like to see is 5 lines here - the labour description and charge under charges description, unit price, qty and est_parts_sale etc, and of course, there could be more than 1 labour line.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2007
Hi
I'm trying to compare two varchars to check if they are the same, if they are the same then the color must turn red, if not then they must remain black
SELECT *
from members m, client c
where C.ClientID = m.ClientID
AND c.ClientID in (87,86)
AND m.email in ('dassd@fdskjh.com','asdfas@sdfd.net', etc...)
my results will give me two of the same email addresses but with different ClientID's, now when it
finds the same email it needs to make them both "RED"
Please help, any advice would be helpful
Kind Regards
Carel Greaves
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 29, 2015
I have a script that is supposed to run thru 2 joined tables and update a field in the 3rd table. The script works but takes approx. 4 hours to run against 250k records.
UPDATE a
SET Con_Mailings = STUFF((SELECT '; ' + c.ListName
FROM [server].[xxxxx_MSCRM].[dbo].ListBase c with (nowait)
INNER JOIN [server].[xxxxxx_MSCRM].[dbo].[ListMemberBase] b with (nowait)
ON b.ListID = c.ListID
WHERE b.EntityID = a.TmpContactID
FOR XML PATH('')),1,1,'')
FROM [xx_Temp].[dbo].[Lyris_CombinedTest] a
I should end up with something like this in the con_mailings field:
'Mailing1, Mailing2, Mailing3'
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 21, 2014
Im trying to delete duplicate records from the output of the query below, if they also meet certain conditions ie 'different address type' then I would merge the records. From the following query how do I go about achieving one and/or the other from either the output, or as an extension of the query itself?
SELECT
a1z103acno AccountNumber
, a1z103frnm FirstName
, a1z103lanm LastName
, a1z103ornm OrgName
, a3z103adr1 AddressLine1
, A3z103city City
, A3z103st State
[code]...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 28, 2007
We have an archive table which keeps each instance of a sales order that was archived under a "Verion No" field. Each time the sales order is archived it is entered into the archive tables (Sales Header Archive, Sales Line Archive). What I am trying to do is write a query to return all sales orders but only the most recent archived version.
For example this table layout is similar to what I am working with. Version No, Order No and Customer No. are the keys between the Header and Line tables, Customer Name column in the output is from only the Sales Header Archive table
SALES LINE ARCHIVE TABLE
Version No - Order No. - Customer No -----> (other columns)
1 s-5 1000
2 s-5 1000
1 s-6 2000
1 s-7 3000
2 s-7 3000
3 s-7 3000
1 s-8 4000
1 s-9 2000
2 s-9 2000
Here is what I need to output to show:
RESULTS OF JOINED TABLES
Version No - Order No - Customer No - Customer Name ---> (other columns)
2 s-5 1000 Something, Inc.
1 s-6 2000 Acme
3 s-7 3000 Company, LLC
1 s-8 4000 Blah & Associates
2 s-9 2000 Acme
It should return the last Version No of each Sales order.
Does that make sense? It is something probably easy... But, I've spent two days using multiples and multiples of different ways, that just aren't working: I'm about to dropkick my server cabinet...
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2006
I'm using SQL server 200
Table A has columns CompressedProduct, Tool, Operation
Table B in a differnt database has columns ID, Product, Tool Operation
I cannot edit table A. I can select records from A and insert into B. And I can select only the records that are in both tables.
But I want to be able to select any records that are in table A but not in Table B.
ie. I want to select records from A where the combination of Product, Tool and Operaton does not appear in Table B, even if all 3 on their own do appear.
This code return all the records from A. I need to filter out the records found in Table B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SELECT ID, CompressedProduct, oq.Tool, oq.Operation FROM OPENQUERY (Lisa_Link,
'SELECT DISTINCT CompressedProduct, Tool, Operation FROM tblToolStatus ts
JOIN tblProduct p ON ts.ProductID = p.ProductID
JOIN tblTool t ON ts.ToolID = t.ToolID
JOIN tblOperation o ON ts.OperationID = o.OperationID
WHERE ts.ToolID=66
') oq
LEFT JOIN Family f on oq.CompressedProduct = f.Product and oq.Tool = f.Tool and oq.Operation = f.Operation
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2004
Would appreciate if someone could help!
I have 2 tables , table 1 and table 2. Exact copies of some records from table 1 also exist in table 2. What i need to do is display records that exist in table 1 but do not exist in table 2.
Thanks for your help!
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2006
Hi,
Im new to SQL Server and Im having trouble to decide wich is the best way to filter the tables that one user can read and write.
For example the table Sales as a field named Branch (SMALLINT) with values 1 or 2 (the store that made the sale). User "A" can see and write only records where Branch = 1.
Im developing a windows program that shows all the purchased orders in a DataGridView. So should I make the filters (permissions) in the program or in the SQL Server?.
I hope I made my self clear (my english is not so good)
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
i didnt think my sql qeury was that complicated that it would crash my webapp. all im trying to do is filter data between two tables. heres my query<cfquery name="GetResults" datasource="#datasource#">SELECT *FROM Content, Content_SitesWHERE Content.ContentID <> Content_Sites.ContentIDORDER BY Content.ContentID DESC</cfquery>equals works, but when i try not equals, it all goes haywire. any ideas?TIA
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 24, 2008
Hi friendsI have little problem here.I am creating data tables dynamically.I want to filter it using sql query.Suppose,
I have four data tables with the same structure but records may be
different.There are two fields ServiceMethod and Rates.Now I want to filter all tables and want to get match records with the ServiceMethod.Suppose,four records in First table,three records in other three tables,and only two records(Service method) are same in all tables.I
want to that two records by filtering all tables and sum of rates and
want to add matched records in new table and bind dropdownlist.Can any guide me how to filter more than one tables using sql query if data tables are created dynamically?Thanks in advance.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 15, 2007
Hello,
I hope someone can answer this, I'm not even sure where to start looking for documentation on this. The SQL query I'm referencing is included at the bottom of this post.
I have a query with 3 select statements joined together like tables. It works great, except for the fact that I need to declare a variable and make it a table within two of those 3. The example is below. You'll see that I have three select statements made into tables A, B, and C, and that table A has a variable @years, which is a table.
This works when I just run table A by itself, but when I execute the entire query, I get an error about the "declare" keyword, and then some other errors near the word "as" and the ")" character. These are some of those errors that I find pretty meaningless that just mean I've really thrown something off.
So, am I not allowed to declare a variable within these SELECT tables that I'm creating and joining?
Thanks in advance,
Andy
Select * from
(
declare @years table (years int);
insert into @years
select
CASE
WHEN month(getdate()) in (1) THEN year(getdate())-1
WHEN month(getdate()) in (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12) THEN year(getdate())
END
select
u.fullname
, sum(tx.Dm_Time) LastMonthBillhours
, sum(tx.Dm_Time)/((select dm_billabledays from dm_billabledays where Dm_Month = Month(GetDate()))*8) lasmosbillingpercentage
from
Dm_TimeEntry tx
join
systemuserbase u
on
(tx.owninguser = u.systemuserid)
where
Month(tx.Dm_Date) = Month(getdate())-1
and
year(dm_date) = (select years from @years)
and tx.dm_billable = 1
group by u.fullname
) as A
left outer join
(select
u.FullName
, sum(tx.Dm_Time) Billhours
, ((sum(tx.Dm_Time))
/
((day(getdate()) * ((5.0)/(7.0))) * 8)) perc
from
Dm_TimeEntry tx
join
systemuserbase u
on
(tx.owninguser = u.systemuserid)
where
tx.Dm_Billable = '1'
and
month(tx.Dm_Date) = month(GetDate())
and
year(tx.Dm_Date) = year(GetDate())
group by u.fullname) as B
on
A.Fullname = B.Fullname
Left Outer Join
(
select
u.fullname
, sum(tx.Dm_Time) TwomosagoBillhours
, sum(tx.Dm_Time)/((select dm_billabledays from dm_billabledays where Dm_Month = Month(GetDate()))*8) twomosagobillingpercentage
from
Dm_TimeEntry tx
join
systemuserbase u
on
(tx.owninguser = u.systemuserid)
where
Month(tx.Dm_Date) = Month(getdate())-2
group by u.fullname
) as C
on
A.Fullname = C.Fullname
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2008
Hello,
Here is my problem:
I use SQL Server 2005. I have approx. 50 tables in my database and 30 of them have a filed named "CompanyID". Example:
create table A (ID int identity, NAME varchar(100), COMPANYID int)create table A (ID int identity, REF_ID int, FIELD1 varchar(100), FIELD2 varchar(100), COMPANYID int)
Also there are nearly 200 stored procedures that read data from these tables. Example:
create procedure ABCasbegin /* some checks and expressions here ... */ select ... from A inner join B on (A.ID = B.REF_ID) where ... /* ... */end;
All my queries in the Stored procedure does not filter the tables by CompanyID, so they process the entire data.
However, now we have a requirement to separate the data for each company. That means that we have to put a filter by CompanyID to each of those 20 tables in each query where the tables appear.
Firstly, I put the CompanyID in the context so now its value is accessible through the context_info() function. Thus I do not need now to pass it as a parameter to the stored procedures.
However, I don't know what is the easiest and fastest way to filter the tables. Example:
I modified the above mentioned procedure in the following way:
create procedure ABCasbegin /* some checks and expressions here ... */
-- gets the CompanyID from the context: DECLARE @CompanyID int; SELECT @CompanyID = CONVERT(float, CONVERT(varchar(128), context_info()))
select ... from A inner join B on (A.ID = B.REF_ID) where ...
and A.COMPANYID = @CompanyID and B.COMPANYID = @CompanyID /* ... */end;
Now I have the desired filter by CompanyID. However, modifying over 200 stored procedures is rather tedious work and I don't think that this is the best approach. Is there any functionality in SQL Server that can provide the possibility to put an automatic filter to the tables.
For example: when I wrote "SELECT * FROM A", the actual statements to be executed would be "SELECT * FROM A WHERE CompanyID = CONVERT(float, CONVERT(varchar(128), context_info()))".
I was looking for something like "INSTEAD OF SELECT" triggers but I didn't manage to find any answer.
I would very grateful is someone suggests a solution for something like "global table filter" (that will help me make an easy refactoring)?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Beroetz
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2006
Howdy,
I have a table that has a group. In this group, I want to filter by 2 different expressions, concatenated with an OR. BUT I can't change the "And/Or" column value for the first entry because it is grayed out. The column will automatically change to an OR value if both my expression column fields are the same (which I don€™t want) but if I put any other value in to the expression field of the second row, the "And/Or" field of the first row automatically changes to an AND.
PLEASE! How do I get the And/Or field "ungrayed" so I can change it to what I want?
The 2 filters I and using check the UserID = to the user, and the other is checking a count to get the Top N 1. (So just showing the current user and the top producer)
View 14 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2006
Help.
I have a table with a composite key (two primary keys) that is a foreign key to another table. I need to select all records in the primary key table where there are no matches in the foreign key table... I have no idea how to do this..
Here is how to join the tables:
Select A.Key1, A.Key2 From PrimaryKeyTable A, ForiegnKeyTable B Where A.Key1 = B.Key1 and A.Key2 = B.Key2
I need to query all records that do not join, so basically the inverse of this query. How do I do this? Please let me know if this is in the wrong forum or you need any clarifcation.
Just FYI, on a single Primary key column I would just simply do the following:
Select A.Key From PrimaryTable A, ForiegnTable B Where A.Key not in ( Select A.Key From PrimaryTable A, ForignTable B Where A.Key = B.Key)
but how to with a composite key?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 6, 2006
Is it possible to update the filed used in the inner join
Update t1 set t1.name=t2.name2
From t1 inner join t2 on t1.name = t2.name
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 20, 2006
How do I delete from a joined table....
I want to delete all the records from transaction AND order table where status is > 4
sumfing like:
DELETE ORDERS.*, TRANSACTIONS.*
from ORDERS
INNER JOIN TRANSACTIONS
where ORDERS.order_no = TRANSACTIONS.order_no
and status > 4
but doesnt seem 2 like dat???
THANKS :)
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2014
I create a view with 2 joined tables:
with cte as (
select
DataID,
Name,
SubType,
FileType,
MimeType,
VersionID,
Version
from dtree A1, dversdata A2
where A1.dataid=A2.Docid And A1.Subtype='144'
AND
A2.mimetype='application/news-message-id'
update cte set MimeType = 'application/x-outlook-msg', Subtype=749
what I want to do is to update two columns. Both are from different tables and I get an error..
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2005
I have a table with almost a million rows, although it's quite slim with just ID, date, userID, JobID etc.
Now I want to the ability to add comments to some (probably less than 1%) of those lines.
The question is whether to create a separate comments table to join to it, or to create a comments field within the existing table? The comments field would obviously default to NULL, so wouldn't bloat the table unnecessarily if I add that field (right?), and would always be selected with the row from that table, so I'm leaning towards the latter alternative.
Any thoughts, words of warning?
Thanks
Mark
View 17 Replies
View Related
