I have one stored procedure for insert, update and delete operations, I need automatically logged the insert,update and delete operations.
How can I set auto logged mechanism and how can I access the logs in c#?
Thanks
How could I possibly write a SP for Insert, Update and Delete for the below tables under this condition. On some conditions they need to be queried, initially for Insert, first the data should be inserted to PROFILES table and then to ROLES table. When inserting, if an entry is new then it should be added to both the tables. Sometimes when I make an entry which is already present in PROFILES table, then in this case the value should be added to the ROLES table. And a delete query to delete rows from both the table.
CREATE TABLE PROFILES(
USER_ID varchar(20) UNIQUE NOT NULL,
Name varchar(40) NULL,
Address varchar(25) NULL
[code]...
Hi All,
As known its recommended to use stored procedures when executing on database for perfermance issue. I am thinking to create 4 stored procedures on my database (spSelectQuery, spInsertQuery, spUpdateQuery, spDeleteQuery)
that accept any query and execute it and return the result, rather than having a number of stored procedures for all tables? create PROCEDURE spSelectQuery
(
@select_query nvarchar(500)
)
as
begin
exec sp_executesql @select_query, N'@col_val varchar(50) out', @col_val out
end
Is this a good approach design, or its bad???
Thanks all
I have looked at the membership and roles stored procs from Microsoft and noticed that most of them are wrapped into a transaction. Ok some of the stored procs updated more than one table in which case it makes sense to wrap the code into a transaction. Our stored procs are a little simpler and insert, update or delete only one table for the most part. My question is: What is good practice, should I wrap my stored procs in transactions or because I am only updating one table leave it the way it is, see sample below: Please advise, newbie
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[syl_Category_Insert] @CategoryName nvarchar(64), @LanguageID int
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
BEGIN TRYINSERT INTO [syl_Categories]
VALUES(
@CategoryName,
@LanguageID)
SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY() AS [CategoryID]
RETURNEND TRY
BEGIN CATCH
--Execute LogError_Insert SP EXECUTE [dbo].[syl_LogError_Insert];
--Being in a Catch Block indicates failure.
--Force RETURN to -1 for consistency (other return values are generated, such as -6).RETURN -1
END CATCH
END
I have looked at the membership and roles stored procs from Microsoft and noticed that most of them are wrapped into a transaction. Ok some of the stored procs updated more than one table in which case it makes sense to wrap the code into a transaction. Our stored procs are a little simpler and insert, update or delete only one table for the most part. My question is: What is good practice, should I wrap my stored procs in transactions or because I am only updating one table leave it the way it is, see sample below: Please advise, newbie
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[syl_Category_Insert]
@CategoryName nvarchar(64), @LanguageID int
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
BEGIN TRY
INSERT INTO [syl_Categories]
VALUES(
@CategoryName,
@LanguageID)
SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY() AS [CategoryID]
RETURN
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
--Execute LogError_Insert SP
EXECUTE [dbo].[syl_LogError_Insert];
--Being in a Catch Block indicates failure.
--Force RETURN to -1 for consistency (other return values are generated, such as -6).
RETURN -1
END CATCH
END
how to create package upsert industry and want to do update and insert operations from database.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have 3 tables...TableA, TableB, TableC TableA - Personal InformationPersonalInfoId (Primary) , First Name,Last NameTableB - Personal Information To Department IDReferenceID, FKPersonalInfoId, FKDepartmentIdTableC - DepartmentDepartmentId, DepartmentNameI am coding Asp.Net VB using VWD express with Sql Server Express. I know how to create a stored procedure to delete, insert and even update a record in TableA, TableB, TableC respectively.If I need to delete a record in TableC, which has a related record in TableB, I have read that I need to use a Trigger. I never have used a Trigger and it is new to me. Can someone point me a way on how to use one in this case of my deleting scenario. Pretty much, if a user clicks on a delete button, and deletes a record in my TableC, I dont want a FKDpartmentId in my TableB that doesnt exist anymore because it was deleted in TableC or prevent a user from deleting that record till the relationship in TableB is no longer valid. In the same vain, If I have a input form which ask the user to enter their First Name and Last Name and Department, i would like to add those records in TableA for First and Last Name, TableB for the Department. Once again, how do I create a Trigger that if I insert a record in Table A to also insert the information for Department in Table B, if its successful in my stored procedure. Hope that made sense.Thanks.
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi
I'm new to SQL. The primary keys of the tables I use or not autonumbered.
I need to insert data and delete data. When I need to insert data al the primary keys should change. example
1 tim
2 frank
3 jan
4 klaus
I need to insert a new name at place number 3. So jan get's number 4, Klaus number 5.
The same thing goes if I want to delete a row
How can this be done with a stored procedure??? anybody an idea
Or are there script available for things like this?
Tim
Hopefully someone can help me with this, or tell me if it's even possible for SQL Server 2005. I'm new to this and learning as I go along.
Here's what I want to do - I have a couple of queries running off a linked server. I want to take the results of those queries and insert them into a table in SQL Server, but first I want to delete the current contents of that table. I want to build a stored procedure that I can run monthly to temporarily store this data for review; once I'm ready to review the next month I want the procedure to delete the data in the table and then insert the next month's data. Hopefully that makes sense.
Is it possible to build? Anyone have any examples of such a thing, or can you point me someplace that might be able to help?
Thanks.
I would like to know if it is possible to build one SP to perform all the functions (Add, Update, delete and Select) and then use this in my code instead of making one SP per action. I know this is possible but the update part throws me a little. I used an online example to explain where I fall short on the subject.
USE [SomeTable]
GO
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[MasterInsertUpdateDelete]
[Code] ....
So using this as the Stored Procedure, how would I update a records Salary alone by the ID without having to use all the information with just the salary being the new value?
hi guys,I am using SQL server 2005, i created a table of 4 columns. I want to create a stored procedure which will insert delete and modify the table using flag. all the three insert, delete and update must work in a single stored procedure. pls help me out. Thank You.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs there a way in SQL server that can generate stored procedures for select, insert, update, delete on certain tables?
View 4 Replies View Related
spaces problem on multi update delete stored procedure
on the the insert i get it like this
58830803, 55329429, 308962604, 55696314, 309128726
as you see only the first empid=58830803 is without spaces
how to fix this
my code
Code Snippet
DECLARE @empid varchar(500)
set @empid ='58830803, 55329429, 308962604, 55696314, 309128726'
DELETE FROM [Table_1]
WHERE charindex(','+CONVERT(varchar,[empid])+',',','+@empid+',') > 0
UPDATE [empList]
SET StartDate = CONVERT(DATETIME, '1900-01-01 00:00:00', 102), val_ok = 0
WHERE charindex(','+CONVERT(varchar,[empid])+',',','+@empid+',') > 0
UPDATE [empList]
SET StartDate = CONVERT(DATETIME, '1900-01-01 00:00:00', 102), val_ok = 0
WHERE charindex(','+CONVERT(varchar,[empid])+',',','+@empid+',') > 0
TNX
I'm doing this more as a learning exercise than anything else. I want to write a stored procedure that I will pass a key to it and it will look in the database to see if a row exists for that key. If it does, then it needs to update the row on the DB, if not, then it needs to insert a new row using the key as an indexed key field on the database.for starters can this even be done with a stored procedure?if so, can someone provide some guidance as to how?thanks in advance,Burr
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am trying to take some SQL queries written by Visual Studio, one insert and one update and combine them into a single stored procedure. The insert procedure should be included in the update procedure and a check should be done for an existing record based upon the primary key. If it exist, an update command should be performed, else an insert. I also need to wrap the procedure in a transaction and rollback if any errors have occurred, else commit the transaction. If I have the following Insert and Update statements, can anyone help me write the stored procedure I need? Again, the current statements were automatically created and could be modified as needed.
INSERT INTO tblClub(ClubPKID, ClubName) VALUES (@ClubPKID, @ClubName); SELECT ClubPKID, ClubName FROM tblClub WHERE (ClubPKID = @@IDENTITY)
UPDATE tblClub SET ClubPKID = @ClubPKID, ClubName = @ClubName WHERE (ClubPKID = @Original_ClubPKID) AND (ClubName = @ClubName); SELECT ClubPKID, ClubName FROM tblClub WHERE (ClubPKID = @ClubPKID)
Thanks!
Hi:
I am trying to write a stored procedure that when passed a name, value it will
1. update the record if the name exists
2. create a new record if it doesnt
how would i do this?
HI,
I€™m trying to do a Stored Procedure (SP) that stores data from a form in ASP.NET.
If the record does not exist, it will create a new record first.
This is my first SP, so if best practise is done another way, I would like to hear about it.
Code:
Code Snippet
CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.StorUserRecord
/* some of these are for future use */
@UpdateMetode Int,
@UserIndex Int,
@UserFirstName NVarChar,
@UserLastName NVarChar,
@UserPassword NVarChar,
@UserPrivateMail NVarChar,
@UserCompanyMail NVarChar,
@UserTitle Int,
@UserSecLevel NVarChar,
@UserAddressLine1 NVarChar,
@UserAddressLine2 NVarChar,
@UserZipCode Int,
@UserPrivateMobilNumber NVarChar,
@UserCompanyMobilNumber NVarChar,
@UserHomeNumber NVarChar,
@UserCompanyDirectNumber NVarChar,
@UserCPR NVarChar,
@UserWorkerID NVarChar,
@UserDepartment Int,
@UserActive Bit,
@UserAccess Bit,
@UserDeleted Bit
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @UseThisUserIndex Int;
IF NOT @UserIndex > 0
/* Create new record and return the "auto id" from UserIndex */
BEGIN
INSERT INTO [User] (UserFirstName) VALUES (@UserFirstName)
OUTPUT INSERTED.UserIndex
INTO @UseThisUserIndex
GO
END
ELSE
/* Use the "auto id" from the @UserIndex */
BEGIN
@UseThisUserIndex = @UserIndex
END
END
RETURN
I'm getting this error:
Msg 102, Level 15, State 1, Procedure StorUserRecord, Line 33
Incorrect syntax near 'OUTPUT'.
Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Line 2
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'ELSE'.
Hello,
Basically i want to have a stored procedute which will do an insert statement if the record is not in the table and update if it exists.
The Id is not autonumber, so if the record doesn't exists the sp should return the last id+1 to use it for the new record.
Is there any example i can see, or somebody can help me with that?
Thanks a lot.
Hi all,can somebody help to write this stored procedure Table1 Table2LogID MigIDUserMove LogIDUserNew Domain User The two tables are inner join with LogID.If in Table2 LogID=NULL then create new dataset in Table1 (INSERT)and then Update LogID in Table2IF in Table2 LogID= 2 (or something else) then update the dataset in Table1 with the same LogID Thanks
View 1 Replies View Relatedany stored procedure guru's around ?
I'm going nuts around here.
ok basically I've create a multilangual website using global en local
resources for the static parts and a DB for the dynamic part.
I'm using the PROFILE option in asp.net 2.0 to store the language preference of visitors. It's working perfectly.
but Now I have some problems trying to get the right inserts.
basically I have designed my db based on this article:
http://www.codeproject.com/aspnet/LocalizedSamplePart2.asp?print=true
more specifically:
http://www.codeproject.com/aspnet/LocalizedSamplePart2/normalizedSchema.gif
ok now let's take the example of Categorie, Categorie_Local, and Culture
I basically want to create an insert that will let me insert categories into my database with the 2 language:
eg.
in categorie I have ID's 1 & 2
in culture I have:
ID: 1
culture: en-US
ID 2
culture: fr-Be
now the insert should create into Categorie_Local:
cat_id culture_id name
1 1 a category
1 2 une categorie
and so on...
I think this thing is only do-able with a stored procedure because:
1. when creating a new categorie, a new ID has to be entered into Categorie table
2. into the Categorie_local I need 2 rows inserted with the 2 values for 2 different cultures...
any idea on how to do this right ?
I'm a newbie with ms sql and stored procedures :s
help would be very very appreciated!
thanks a lot
I have Table Staffsubjects with columns and Values
      Â
Guid  AcademyId  StaffId  ClassId  SegmentId  SubjectId  Status
 1    500    101     007   101    555      1
 2    500    101     007   101    201      0
 3    500    22     008   105    555      1
I need to do 3 scenarios in this table.
1.First i need to update the row if the status column is 0 to 1
2.Need to insert the row IF SegmentId=@SegmentId and SubjectId<>@SubjectId and StaffId=@StaffId
3.Need to insert the row IF StaffId<>@StaffId And ClassId=@ClassId and  SegmentId<>@SegmentId and  SubjectId<>@SubjectId
I have wrote the stored procedure to do this, But the problem is If do the update, It is reflecting in the database by changing 0 to 1. But it shows error like cannot insert the duplicate
Here is the stored Procedure what i have wrote
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[InsertAssignTeacherToSubjects]
@AcademyId uniqueidentifier,
@StaffId uniqueidentifier,
@ClassId uniqueidentifier,
@SegmentId uniqueidentifier,
@SubjectId uniqueidentifier
[Code] .....
I have the following stored procedure, to insert or update a record and return the id field, however the procedure returns two results sets, one empty if it's a new record - is there a way to supress the empty results set?
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[AddNode]
@Name VARCHAR(15),
@Thumbprint VARCHAR(40),
@new_identity [uniqueidentifier] = NULL OUTPUT
AS
BEGIN
UPDATE dbo.NODES
[Code] ....
All:
I have created a stored procedure on SQL server that does an Insert else Update to a table. The SP starts be doing "IF NOT EXISTS" check at the top to determine if it should be an insert or an update.
When i run the stored procedure directly on SQL server (Query Analyzer) it works fine. It updates when I pass in an existing ID#, and does an insert when I pass in a NULL to the ID#.
When i run the exact same logic from my aspx.vb code it keeps inserting the data everytime! I have debugged the code several times and all the parameters are getting passed in as they should be? Can anyone help, or have any ideas what could be happening?
Here is the basic shell of my SP:
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[spHeader_InsertUpdate]
@FID int = null OUTPUT,@FLD1 varchar(50),@FLD2 smalldatetime,@FLD3 smalldatetime,@FLD4 smalldatetime
AS
Declare @rtncode int
IF NOT EXISTS(select * from HeaderTable where FormID=@FID)
Begin begin transaction
--Insert record Insert into HeaderTable (FLD1, FLD2, FLD3, FLD4) Values (@FLD1, @FLD2, @FLD3,@FLD4) SET @FID = SCOPE_IDENTITY(); --Check for error if @@error <> 0 begin rollback transaction select @rtncode = 0 return @rtncode end else begin commit transaction select @rtncode = 1 return @rtncode end endELSE
Begin begin transaction
--Update record Update HeaderTable SET FLD2=@FLD2, FLD3=@FLD3, FLD4=@FLD4 where FormID=@FID;
--Check for error if @@error <> 0 begin rollback transaction select @rtncode = 0 return @rtncode end else begin commit transaction select @rtncode = 2 return @rtncode end
End---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Blue.
I have Table Staffsubjects
with columns and Values
Guid AcademyId StaffId ClassId SegmentId SubjectId Status
1 500 101 007 101 555 1
2 500 101 007 101 201 0
3 500 22 008 105 555 1
I need to do 3 scenarios in this table.
1.First i need to update the row if the status column is 0 to 1
2.Need to insert the row IF SegmentId=@SegmentId and SubjectId<>@SubjectId and StaffId=@StaffId
3.Need to insert the row IF StaffId<>@StaffId And ClassId=@ClassId and SegmentId<>@SegmentId and SubjectId<>@SubjectId
I have wrote the stored procedure to do this. But the problem is If do the update. It is reflecting in the database by changing 0 to 1. But it shows error like cannot insert the duplicate
Here is the stored Procedure what i have wrote
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[InsertAssignTeacherToSubjects]
@AcademyId uniqueidentifier,
@StaffId uniqueidentifier,
@ClassId uniqueidentifier,
@SegmentId uniqueidentifier,
@SubjectId uniqueidentifier
[Code] ....
I have to control my business rules in a Instead of Insert, Update Trigger.
Since the Control Flow is quite complicated I wanted to break it into stored procedures that get called from within the trigger.
I know that Insert Statements embedded in a Instead of Trigger do not execute the Insert of the trigger you are calling.
But... If I embed stored procedures that handle my inserts in the Instead of Insert trigger call the trigger and put in a endless loop or are the stored procedure inserts treated the same as trigger embedded inserts.
I'm trying to update (increment)
Company.SumtotalLogons
from CompanyUsers.NumberOfLogons
where CompanyUsers.CompanyID = Company.CompanyID
I'd like to either write a formula (if it is even possible to fire a formula from one table update/insert to increment a field in another table), or a stored procedure that triggers an auto update/append into Company.SumTotalLogons
I know this is possible in access, so i'm wondering how to go about it in ms-sql?
any ideas?
the stored procedure don't delete all the records
need help
Code Snippet
DECLARE @empid varchar(500)
set @empid ='55329429,58830803,309128726,55696314'
DELETE FROM [Table_1]
WHERE charindex(','+CONVERT(varchar,[empid])+',',','+@empid+',') > 0
UPDATE [empList]
SET StartDate = CONVERT(DATETIME, '1900-01-01 00:00:00', 102), val_ok = 0
WHERE charindex(','+CONVERT(varchar,[empid])+',',','+@empid+',') > 0
UPDATE [empList]
SET StartDate = CONVERT(DATETIME, '1900-01-01 00:00:00', 102), val_ok = 0
WHERE charindex(','+CONVERT(varchar,[empid])+',',','+@empid+',') > 0
TNX
Hi,
I'm reasonably new to ASP.NET 2.0
I'm in my wizard_FinishButtonClick event, and from here, I want to take data from the form and some session variables and put it into my database via a stored procedure. I also want the stored procedure to return an output value. I do not need to perform a select or a delete.
For the life of me, I can't find a single example online or in my reference books that tells me how to accomplish this task using a SqlDataSource control. I can find lots of examples on sqldatasources that have a select statements (I don't need one) and use insert and update sql statements instead of stored procedures (I use stored procedures).
I desperately need the syntax to:
a) create the SqlDataSource with the appropriate syntax for calling a stored procedure to update and/or insert (again, this design side of VS2005 won't let me configure this datasource without including a select statement...which I don't need).
b) syntax on how to create the parameters that will be sent to the stored procedure for this sqldatasource (including output parameters).
c) syntax on how to set the values for these parameters (again...coming from form controls and session variables)
d) syntax on how to execute, in the code-behind, the stored procedure via the sqldatasource.
If anybody has sample code or a link or two, I would be most appreciative.
Thank you in advance for any help!
Hi All,I'm wondering if anyone can point me at some online resources thatdemonstrate how to run a stored procedure against an SQL Server 2000server at 6am each day?Any help much appreciated!Much warmth,planetthoughtful
View 2 Replies View Relatedtable2 is intially populated (basically this will serve as historical table for view); temptable and table2 will are similar except that table2 has two extra columns which are insertdt and updatedt
process:
1. get data from an existing view and insert in temptable
2. truncate/delete contents of table1
3. insert data in table1 by comparing temptable vs table2 (values that exists in temptable but not in table2 will be inserted)
4. insert data in table2 which are not yet present (comparing ID in t2 and temptable)
5. UPDATE table2 whose field/column VALUE is not equal with temptable. (meaning UNMATCHED VALUE)
* for #5 if a value from table2 (historical table) has changed compared to temptable (new result of view) this must be updated as well as the updateddt field value.
I don't know if this is a newbie question or not, I want SQL Server to automatically execute a stored procedure at the first of each month, how can I do this ?
Regards,
AJ
Be nice to nerds. Chances are you'll end up working for one. (Bill Gates)
Hi,
I want to run a stored procedure automatically at regular intervals.The time duration is given by me as input details.for example i will
give the date and i should send email to some recipients just one day before the given date.I want this to be done in sql stored procedures.
Can anyone help?
Thanks in advance,
Nithya
I am using SQL 2005, and I am wondering if there is a way to set up a role such that when a new stored procedure is created, the role will automatically be given "execute" permission on that stored procedure.
We have our own dedicated server, but I also administer a database on a shared server (on DiscountASP.net), and they have it set up that way -- when a new stored procedure is created, the user set up by DiscountASP automatically has EXECUTE permission on that procedure.
I keep trying to duplicate this on our dedicated server, but to no avail. I would like to make it so a specific role always has execute permission on every new stored procedure, without having to explicitly add permissions to the role using the properties of the stored procedure.
Is this possible? It seems like it should be, but I can't figure out how. (I'm primarily a programmer, not a DBA, so apologies if this is a dumb question.)