I have a sql statement that has several OR statements in it which work fine. It looks like bottom below.
What I need to know is can you put a IF statement in a where clause like this. Such as
WHERE convert(datetime, patient_.df_admit_date, 101) > = @tdate or
if patient_.dru = "yes" convert(datetime, patinet_.df_admit_date, 101) > = @tdate - 8 or
WORKIN STATEMENT
select
PATIENT.ACCOUNT_ID,patient_.DF_PPD_POS_NEG, PATIENT.LAST_NAME, PATIENT.FIRST_NAME, PATIENT.MIDDLE_INIT, PATIENT.OTHER_ID_NUMBER,
PATIENT_.DF_ADMIT_DATE, PATIENT_.DF_PPD, PATIENT_.DF_PPD_POS_NEG, PATIENT_.DF_PPDB_DATE,
PATIENT_.DF_XRAY_DATE, PATIENT_.df_ppd_read, FROM
{ oj development.dbo.PATIENT PATIENT INNER JOIN development.dbo.PATIENT_ PATIENT_ ON
PATIENT.COMPANY_ID = PATIENT_.COMPANY_ID AND
PATIENT.DEPARTMENT_ID = PATIENT_.DEPARTMENT_ID AND
PATIENT.ACCOUNT_ID = PATIENT_.ACCOUNT_ID}
where
convert(datetime, patient_.df_admit_date, 101) > = @tdate or
convert(datetime,patient_.df_ppd, 101) >= @tdate - 2 or continued!!!
If I use an OR statement inside the WHERE clause of a SELECT, should SQL Server evaluate both side of the OR or just the left hand side if it returns TRUE?
The reason I'm asking is that I have an SP the accepts a string parameter, this param is a search condition, say a name. The param is a nvarchar and can be null. In my SP I do this:
SELECT * FROM Customer WHERE CustomerDeleted = 0 AND ( @searchText IS NULL OR CustomerID IN (SELECT ID FROM fn_GetSearchResults(@searchText)) )
The idea is that if the @searchText param is NULL then all Customers are return, otherwise the @searchText is used in a function to determine which customers match the criteria.
This only works if SQL stops evaluating the OR condition as soon as it comes accross a TRUE statement.
when trying to execute the following query with SQL CE 3.1 and OLEDB on WM2003:
SELECT C.Panel_Id, C.Panel_Tier, C.Panel_Type, C.Panel_No, C.Panel_Position FROM tblMeasurements AS A, tblAssignment_Ant_Pan AS B, tblPanels AS C WHERE (A.Measurement_No=?) AND (A.Antenna_No = B.Antenna_No) AND (B.Panel_Id = C.Panel_Id) AND C.Panel_Position in (SELECT Panel_Position FROM tblMeasurement_Results WHERE (Measurement_No=?) AND ABS(Measurement_Value) BETWEEN ? AND ? GROUP BY Panel_Position)
i get this error returned: 0x80040E1DL -- DB_E_UNSUPPORTEDCONVERSION -- Requested conversion is not supported.
I don't know where inside the sql string a conversion is necessary/fails. Surprisingsly when i modify the sql statement a little, it is executed WITHOUT ERRORS:
SELECT C.Panel_Id, C.Panel_Tier, C.Panel_Type, C.Panel_No, C.Panel_Position FROM tblMeasurements AS A, tblAssignment_Ant_Pan AS B, tblPanels AS C WHERE (A.Measurement_No=?) AND (A.Antenna_No = B.Antenna_No) AND (B.Panel_Id = C.Panel_Id) AND C.Panel_Position in (SELECT Panel_Position FROM tblMeasurement_Results WHERE (Measurement_No=?) AND Measurement_Value BETWEEN ? AND ? GROUP BY Panel_Position)
The only difference between the 2 statements is the ABS() function inside the sub query.
More surprisingly, with the query analyser on the PDA i can execute both statements fine. I am absolutely confused now where i have to search for the mistake.
I would appreciate it very much if someone out there knows an answer or a hint and could tell me.
in a SSIS 2012 pkg, I'm trying to specify a SELECT TOP ? myColumn FROM myTable inside an Execute SQL task, but unsuccessfully.Is it possible to parameterize the TOP clause?
For inserting current date and time into the database, is it more efficient and performant and faster to do getDate() inside SQL Server and insert the value OR to do System.DateTime.Now in the application and then insert it in the table? I figure even small differences would be magnified if there is moderate traffic, so every little bit helps. Thanks.
I'm trying to execute a stored procedure within the case clause of select statement. The stored procedure returns a table, and is pretty big and complex, and I don't particularly want to copy the whole thing over to work here. I'm looking for something more elegant.
@val1 and @val2 are passed in
CREATE TABLE #TEMP( tempid INT IDENTITY (1,1) NOT NULL, myint INT NOT NULL, mybool BIT NOT NULL )
INSERT INTO #TEMP (myint, mybool) SELECT my_int_from_tbl, CASE WHEN @val1 IN (SELECT val1 FROM (EXEC dbo.my_stored_procedure my_int_from_tbl, my_param)) THEN 1 ELSE 0 FROM dbo.tbl WHERE tbl.val2 = @val2
SELECT COUNT(*) FROM #TEMP WHERE mybool = 1
If I have to, I can do a while loop and populate another temp table for every "my_int_from_tbl," but I don't really know the syntax for that.
Just wonder whether is there any indicator or system parameters that can indicate whether stored procedure A is executed inside query analyzer or executed inside application itself so that if execution is done inside query analyzer then i can block it from being executed/retrieve sensitive data from it?
What i'm want to do is to block someone executing stored procedure using query analyzer and retrieve its sensitive results. Stored procedure A has been granted execution for public user but inside application, it will prompt access denied message if particular user has no rights to use system although knew public user name and password. Because there is second layer of user validation inside system application.
However inside query analyzer, there is no way control execution of stored procedure A it as user knew the public user name and password.
Looking forward for replies from expert here. Thanks in advance.
Note: Hope my explaination here clearly describe my current problems.
I have a quite big SQL query which would be nice to be used using UNION betweern two Select and Where clauses. I noticed that if both Select clauses have Where part between UNION other is ignored. How can I prevent this?
I found a article in StackOverflow saying that if UNION has e.g. two Selects with Where conditions other one will not work. [URL] ....
I have installed SQL Server 2014 and I tried to use tricks mentioned in StackOverflow's article but couldn't succeeded.
Any example how to write two Selects with own Where clauses and those Selects are joined with UNION?
Hi, can anyone shed some light on this issue?SELECT Status from lupStatuswith a normal query it returns the correct recordcountSELECT Status from lupStatus GROUP BY Statusbut with a GROUP By clause or DISTINCT clause it return the recordcount= -1
ON dbo.Track_ID.SM_ID = dbo.transactions.sm_session_id
GROUP BY dbo.Track_ID.TrackID
)
) Once moved to SQL Server 2005 the statement would not return and showed SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD to be the waittype when executed. This machine is SP1 and needs to be upgraded to SP2, something that is not going to happen near time.
I changed the SQL to the following, SQL Server now runs it in under a second, but now the app is not functioning correctly. Are the above and the following semantically the same?
UPDATE dbo.Track_ID
SET dbo.Track_ID.Processed = 4 --Regular 1 leg call thats been completed
1) Rows ordered using textual id rather than numeric id
Code Snippet select cast(v.id as nvarchar(2)) id from ( select 1 id union select 2 id union select 11 id ) v order by v.id
Result set is ordered as: 1, 11, 2 I expect: 1,2,11
if renamed or removed alias for "cast(v.id as nvarchar(2))" expression then all works fine.
2) SQL server reject query below with next message
Server: Msg 169, Level 15, State 3, Line 16 A column has been specified more than once in the order by list. Columns in the order by list must be unique.
Code Snippet select cast(v.id as nvarchar(2)) id from ( select 1 id union select 2 id union select 11 id ) v cross join ( select 1 id union select 2 id union select 11 id ) u order by v.id ,u.id
Again, if renamed or removed alias for "cast(v.id as nvarchar(2))" expression then all works fine.
It reproducible on
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2039 (Intel X86) May 3 2005 23:18:38 Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation Developer Edition on Windows NT 5.1 (Build 2600: Service Pack 2)
and
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.3042.00 (Intel X86) Feb 9 2007 22:47:07 Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation Developer Edition on Windows NT 5.1 (Build 2600: Service Pack 2)
In both cases database collation is SQL_Latin1_General_CP1251_CS_AS
If I check quieries above on database with SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS collation then it works fine again.
Could someone clarify - is it bug or expected behaviour?
I am using web developer 2008, while connecting to I wanted to fetch data from Lotus notes database file, for this i used notesql connector, while connectiong to notes database i am fetting error
ERROR [42000] [Lotus][ODBC Lotus Notes]Table reference has to be a table name or an outer join escape clause in a FROM clause
I have already checked that database & table name are correct, please help me out How i can fetch the lotus notes data in my asp.net pages.
I am using web developer 2008, while connecting to I wanted to fetch data from Lotus notes database file, for this i used notesql connector, while connectiong to notes database i am fetting error
ERROR [42000] [Lotus][ODBC Lotus Notes]Table reference has to be a table name or an outer join escape clause in a FROM clause
I have already checked that database & table name are correct, please help me out How i can fetch the lotus notes data in my asp.net pages.
what is differance between conditions put in ON clause and in WHERE clause in JOINS????
see conditions that shown in brown color
select d1.SourceID, d1.PID, d1.SummaryID, d1.EffectiveDate, d1.Audit, d1.ExpirationDate, d1.Indicator from[DB1].[dbo].[Implicit] d1 inner join [DB2].[dbo].[Implicit] d2 on d1.SummaryID=d2.SummaryID AND d1.ListType = d2.ListType AND (d1.EffectiveDate <= d2.ExpirationDate or d2.ExpirationDate is null) AND (d1.ExpirationDate >= d2.EffectiveDate or d1.ExpirationDate is null) whered1.ImplicitID >= d2.ImplicitID AND (d1.SourceID<>d2.SourceID OR (d1.SourceID IS NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NOT NULL) OR (d1.SourceID IS NOT NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NULL) )
select d1.SourceID, d1.PID, d1.SummaryID, d1.EffectiveDate, d1.Audit, d1.ExpirationDate, d1.Indicator from[DB1].[dbo].[Implicit] d1 inner join [DB2].[dbo].[Implicit] d2 on d1.SummaryID=d2.SummaryID AND d1.ImplicitID = d1.ImplicitIDAND d1.ListType = d2.ListType AND (d1.EffectiveDate <= d2.ExpirationDate or d2.ExpirationDate is null) AND (d1.ExpirationDate >= d2.EffectiveDate or d1.ExpirationDate is null) whered1.ImplicitID >= d2.ImplicitID AND (d1.SourceID<>d2.SourceID OR (d1.SourceID IS NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NOT NULL) OR (d1.SourceID IS NOT NULL AND d2.SourceID IS NULL) )
another thing...
if we put AND d1.ImplicitID = d1.ImplicitID condition in second query then shall we remove d1.ImplicitID >= d2.ImplicitID from WHERE clause????
Hi everyone, I saw some queries where SQL inner join clause and the where clause is used at the same time. I knew that "on" is used instead of the "where" clause. Would anyone please exaplin me why both "where" and "on" clause is used in some sql Select queries ?
I have a statement which might need a while inside of a while. The start date - end date creates one record for a record insert. I have that working. But along with producing a record for every day there might be an instance where something is dispersed 3 times a day for five days. I then need to create 3 records for every day for 15 records. This only happens on records if the daily dispersal is greater than 1. The code below works fine, but should I add a second while inside of the existing one for the @freq and increment it by one. Would an If or case inside of the while be better? Thanks
set @freq = freq in table set @nodays = datediff(day, @sdate - 1, @edate) select @nodays while @cnter < @nodays and begin --insert values
insert into PATIENT_MEDICATION_dispersal2_
values (@account_id,@caseid, @entcid, @ndcid, @sdate) Set @cnter = @cnter + 1 set @sdate = @sdate + 1
Example, suppose you have these 2 tables(NOTE: My example is totally different, but I'm simply trying to setupthe a simpler version, so excuse the bad design; not the point here)CarsSold {CarsSoldID int (primary key)MonthID intDealershipID intNumberCarsSold int}Dealership {DealershipID int, (primary key)SalesTax decimal}so you may have many delearships selling cars the same month, and youwanted a report to sum up totals of all dealerships per month.select cs.MonthID,sum(cs.NumberCarsSold) as 'TotalCarsSoldInMonth',sum(cs.NumberCarsSold) * d.SalesTax as 'TotalRevenue'from CarsSold csjoin Dealership d on d.DealershipID = cs.DealershipIDgroup by cs.MonthIDMy question is, is there a way to achieve something like this:select cs.MonthID,sum(cs.NumberCarsSold) as 'TotalCarsSoldInMonth',TotalCarsSoldInMonth * d.SalesTax as 'TotalRevenue'from CarsSold csjoin Dealership d on d.DealershipID = cs.DealershipIDgroup by cs.MonthIDNotice the only difference is the 3rd column in the select. Myparticular query is performing some crazy math and the only way I knowof how to get it to work is to copy and past the logic which isgetting out way out of hand...Thanks,Dave
Is it possible to use IF inside a query, in the WHERE statement? I started with the query right below, but I onlye got error. After testing and rewriting a lot I ended up with the last query. But there hast to be a better, smarter, more elegant way to write this query? Any hint? ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[LinksInCategory]-- =============================================-- Description: Return all links from the requested category.-- ============================================= (@CategoryId int, @AdminFilter bit)AS SELECT Link.Id, Link.Title, Link.Url, Link.ShortText, Link.Hidden FROM Link WHERE Link.Parent = @CategoryId IF (@AdminFilter = 1) print 'AND Link.Hidden = @AdminFilter' ORDER BY Link.Title ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[LinksInCategory]-- =============================================-- Description: Return all NOT hidden links from the requested category.-- If in Administrators role the return ALL links (the hidden ones also).-- ============================================= (@CategoryId int, @AdminFilter bit)AS IF (@AdminFilter = 1) BEGIN SELECT Link.Id, Link.Title, Link.Url, Link.ShortText, Link.Hidden FROM Link WHERE Link.Parent = @CategoryId ORDER BY Link.Title END ELSE BEGIN SELECT Link.Id, Link.Title, Link.Url, Link.ShortText, Link.Hidden FROM Link WHERE Link.Parent = @CategoryId AND Link.Hidden = @AdminFilter ORDER BY Link.Title END Regards, Sigurd
I want to open a new session/connection inside the execution of a stored procedure. Is this possible ? I ask this because I need a new sesssion with its own transaction.
Hi, everyone. I was using ODBC everywhere in my code and now I'm considering using ADO in a new project. However, I don't want to throw all the old ODBC code away. Is that possible that I can use some wrapper to use ADO underneath while having a ODBC interface?
Is there possibility to use IF conditions inside SELECT statements?For example, can i write something like this:CREATE PROCEDURE [search](@OPTION int,@KEYWORD nvarchar(40))ASBEGINSELECT id FROM projects WHERE title LIKE @KEYWORD IF (@OPTION = 1)THEN (OR description LIKE @KEYWORD)ENDor am i limited to this:....BEGINIF @OPTION = 1SELECT id FROM projects WHERE title LIKE @KEYWORD OR description LIKE@KEYWORDELSESELECT id FROM projects WHERE title LIKE @KEYWORDEND
I have created in my sqlserver 2005 database a stored procedure with the following code. /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// SET ANSI_NULLS ON GO SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON GO
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[d_sty_print_menu_per_role_per_app2] @menu_name VARCHAR(255) = NULL , @is_user VARCHAR(255) = NULL , @is_appl VARCHAR(255) = NULL AS BEGIN -- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from -- interfering with SELECT statements. SET NOCOUNT ON;
;WITH GetHierarchy (item_text ,orden , read_order, item_parent , menu_item , enabled) AS (--Anchor. select tb1.item_text, tb1.orden, tb1.read_order, tb1.item_parent , tb1.menu_item , (SELECT 'N' FROM PROFILE_PERMISSION PP INNER JOIN sys_menu_item ON PP.MENU_ITEM=sys_menu_item.menu_item WHERE PP.PROFILE_INDEX in (select up.profile_index from user_profile up where up.user_id= @is_user) and not exists (select up.profile_index from user_profile up where up.user_id= @is_user and up.profile_index=1) and PP.APPLICATION_CODE = @is_appl AND PP.MENU_NAME=@menu_name --and --PP.MENU_ITEM=tb1.menu_item ) as enabled
From sys_menu_item as tb1 where tb1.MENU_ITEM not in ('m_window','m_help','m_toolbar') and tb1.item_parent not in ('m_toolbar','m_window','m_help') And tb1.item_parent= @menu_name --Members UNION ALL select tb2.item_text, tb2.orden, tb2.read_order, tb2.item_parent , tb2.menu_item , (SELECT 'N' FROM PROFILE_PERMISSION PP INNER JOIN sys_menu_item ON PP.MENU_ITEM=sys_menu_item.menu_item WHERE PP.PROFILE_INDEX in (select up.profile_index from user_profile up where up.user_id= @is_user) and not exists (select up.profile_index from user_profile up where up.user_id= @is_user and up.profile_index=1) and PP.APPLICATION_CODE = @is_appl AND PP.MENU_NAME=@menu_name -- and -- PP.MENU_ITEM=tb1.menu_item ) as enabled
from sys_menu_item as tb2 , GetHierarchy where tb2.MENU_ITEM not in ('m_window','m_help','m_toolbar') and tb2.item_parent not in ('m_toolbar','m_window','m_help') And tb2.item_parent = GetHierarchy.menu_item and tb2.menu_name = @menu_name )
select Space(5*(orden)) + item_text as menui, orden, read_order, item_parent , menu_item ,enabled From GetHierarchy
END /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// So far so good. The problem is in a specific part of the sql statement (which is also part of my business logic). the following statement has a little problem.
(SELECT 'N' FROM PROFILE_PERMISSION PP INNER JOIN sys_menu_item ON PP.MENU_ITEM=sys_menu_item.menu_item WHERE PP.PROFILE_INDEX in (select up.profile_index from user_profile up where up.user_id= @is_user) and not exists (select up.profile_index from user_profile up where up.user_id= @is_user and up.profile_index=1) and PP.APPLICATION_CODE = @is_appl AND PP.MENU_NAME=@menu_name --and --PP.MENU_ITEM=tb1.menu_item ) as enabled When I'm executing, it tells me that the Subquerry is returning more than one rows. I have tried to use TOP 1 but Sqlserver 2005 doesn't allow you to do that because you are inside a recursion. I have tried to do this
(SELECT TOP 1 'N' FROM PROFILE_PERMISSION PP INNER JOIN sys_menu_item ON PP.MENU_ITEM=sys_menu_item.menu_item WHERE PP.PROFILE_INDEX in (select up.profile_index from user_profile up where up.user_id= @is_user) and not exists (select up.profile_index from user_profile up where up.user_id= @is_user and up.profile_index=1) and PP.APPLICATION_CODE = @is_appl AND PP.MENU_NAME=@menu_name --and --PP.MENU_ITEM=tb1.menu_item ) as enabled
But the system prevents me from doing that.
Any ideas ? How can I return only one row (I don't care which one) ?
Can I put this Sql statement in a function and then call it inside this recursion ? Is it permitted ?
I would mostly appreciated any help you can give me.
Hello, inside of my SP i want to execute another SP, something like: EXEC [dbo].[Forum_DeleteBoard] @BoardID = @DelBoardID this function Forum_DeleteBoard returs one row with 3 columns as a table, how do i get the first column of that table into a variable so i can check if it was ok or not(it returns just one row with 3 columns). Columns it returns:QResult , Threads , Answers SELECT @isok = QResult FROM EXEC [dbo].[Forum_DeleteBoard] @BoardID = @DelBoardID ? or how do you get it? Patrick
i ve got a database that has a table...that table has a relationship between its primary key,and another field,actuelly i did it for doing menus and sub menus,so each menu has an ID say menuID and it has DEPTH and parentID which is the menuID of the parent...the problem is that i can not use "Cascade update Related Fields" or "Cascade Delete Related Records" which are really necessary ...for example when deleting parent ,not to have a child lost :)i hope i ll have an answer soon,and thanks in advancedPS: i am using MSSQL 2000 evaluation