IN (subquery) Slower Than Calculation @VAL And Then IN (@VAL)?

Jul 23, 2005

-- I have a situation where doing

-- first example
-- 1. Get series of values througha query into a string (@val)like
'1,2,3,4':

declare @val varchar(4000)
select @Val = @val + cast(myval as varchar) + ',' -- myval is an
integer variable
from xyz
where xyz.field = 33

SET @val = left(@val, len(@val) - 1)

-- 2. EXEC a query using IN (' + @val + ')'

EXEC('
select *
from qpr
where qpr.fieldx IN (' + @val + ')
')

-- is much faster than doing

-- second example
select *
from qpr
where qpr.fieldx IN (select myval
from xyz
where xyz.field = 33)

-- Since second example does not have a correlateed query, why is it
slower?

-- Thanks in advance,
-- Caveman

View 6 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Subquery Calculation Problem??

Feb 11, 2008

Hello,

I am having a problem with subqueries.The code works but i do not get the correct calculated output.

I need to basically find the max and min for each row within a table. the code needs to compare load_1 ,load_2 and load_3 on a particular day,particular month and on a particular year and give the max and min loads among loads columns.

Code:
UPDATE temp
SET offmin=m.tmpmin,
offmax=m.tmpmax
FROM(Select t.year_ID,t.mnth_ID,t.day_ID,tmpmin=min(t.l),
tmpmax=max(t.l)
FROM( select n.year_ID,n.mnth_ID,n.day_ID,l=n.load_1
FROM temp n
UNION ALL
SELECT n.year_ID,n.mnth_ID,n.day_ID,l=n.load_2
FROM temp n
UNION ALL
SELECT n.year_ID,n.mnth_ID,n.day_ID,l=n.load_3
FROM temp n
) AS t,class p
WHERE t.year_ID=p.year_ID
AND t.mnth_ID=p.mnth_ID
AND t.day_ID=p.day_ID
GROUP BY t.year_ID,mnth_ID,day_ID) AS m,class v
WHERE m.year_ID=v.year_ID
AND m.mnth_ID=v.mnth_ID
AND m.day_ID=v.day_ID


Sample Table and output

Year_ID mnth_ID day_ID load_1 load_2 load_3
2008 1 1 200 300 400
2008 1 2 100 150 200

This is the expected output off_max and off_min

off_max off_min
400 200
200 100

The current output i am getting is the same value for all the rows in the offmin and offmax column. The calculation is wrong...
When I just try to use select (outer subquery)instead of update in the query analyser, the select statement selects the right number of columns.
But when I use the update statement actually run the code , the update statement somehow screws the calculation...
Do provide your comments.
Thanks


Any suggestions what am i doing wrong?

View 6 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2008 :: Subquery In SSAS Named Calculation

May 8, 2015

I am trying to get a date diff in a named calculation using inner join I am getting

Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression. #

I have checked online and have been able to get some of my codes right by using the where condition in place of the inner join, but I have not been able to work around the datediff one

(select
DATEDIFF(day,TDate,[DID])
FROM [dv].[dbo].[Dail] as D
inner join
[dv].[dbo].[ANT] as A
on
a.AID = d.AID)

View 0 Replies View Related

Help Cursor Based Stored Procedure Is Getting Slower And Slower!

Jul 20, 2005

I am begginner at best so I hope someone that is better can help.I have a stored procedure that updates a view that I wrote using 2cursors.(Kind of a Inner Loop) I wrote it this way Because I couldn'tdo it using reqular transact SQL.The problem is that this procedure is taking longer and longer to run.Up to 5 hours now! It is anaylizing about 30,000 records. I thinkpartly because we add new records every month.The procedure works like this.The first Cursor stores a unique account and duedate combination fromthe view.It then finds all the accts in the view that have that account duedatecombo and loads them into Cursor 2 this groups them together for datamanipulation. The accounts have to be grouped this way because aaccount can have different due dates and multiple records within eachaccount due date combo and they need to be looked at this way aslittle singular groups.Here is my procedure I hope someone can shead some light on this. Myboss is giving me heck about it. (I think he thinks Girls cant code!)I got this far I hope someone can help me optimize it further.CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.sp_PromiseStatusASBEGINSET NOCOUNT ON/* Global variables */DECLARE @tot_pay moneyDECLARE @rec_upd VARCHAR(1)DECLARE @todays_date varchar(12)DECLARE @mActivityDate2_temp datetimeDECLARE @tot_paydate datetime/* variables for cursor ACT_CUR1*/DECLARE @mAcct_Num1 BIGINTDECLARE @mDueDate1 datetime/* variables for ACT_CUR2 */DECLARE @mAcct_Num2 BIGINTDECLARE @mActivity_Date2 datetimeDECLARE @mPromise_Amt_1 moneyDECLARE @mPromise_Status varchar(3)DECLARE @mCurrent_Due_Amt moneyDECLARE @mDPD intDECLARE @mPromise_Date datetimeSELECT @todays_date =''+CAST(DATEPART(mm,getdate()) AS varchar(2))+'/'+CAST(DATEPART(dd,getdate()) AS varchar(2))+'/'+CAST(DATEPART(yyyy,getdate()) AS varchar(4))+''DECLARE ACT_CUR1 CURSOR FORSELECT DISTINCTA.ACCT_NUM,A.DUE_DATEFROM VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDS AOPEN ACT_CUR1FETCH NEXT FROM ACT_CUR1 INTO @mAcct_Num1 , @mDueDate1WHILE (@@FETCH_STATUS = 0)BEGINSELECT @rec_upd = 'N 'DECLARE ACT_CUR2 CURSOR FORSELECTB.ACCT_NUM,B.ACTIVITY_DATE,B.PROMISE_AMT_1,B.PROMISE_STATUS,B.CURRENT_DUE_AMT,B.DAYS_DELINQUENT_NUM,B.PROMISE_DATE_1FROM VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDS B (UPDLOCK)WHERE B.ACCT_NUM = @mAcct_Num1ANDB.DUE_DATE = @mDueDate1ORDER BY B.ACCT_NUM,B.DUE_DATE,B.ACTIVITY_DATE,CASEB.Time_ObtainedWHEN 0 THEN 0ELSE 1END Desc, B.Time_ObtainedOPEN ACT_CUR2FETCH NEXT FROM ACT_CUR2INTO @mAcct_Num2 ,@mActivity_Date2,@mPromise_Amt_1,@mPromise_Status ,@mCurrent_Due_Amt,@mDPD,@mPromise_DateWHILE (@@FETCH_STATUS = 0)BEGIN----CHECK------------------------------------------------------------------------DECLARE @PrintVariable2 VARCHAR (8000)--SELECT @PrintVariable2 = CAST(@MACCT_NUM2 AS VARCHAR)+''+CAST(@MACTIVITY_DATE2 AS VARCHAR)+' '+CAST(@MPROMISE_AMT_1 ASVARCHAR)+' '+CAST(@MPROMISE_STATUS AS VARCHAR)+''+CAST(@mCurrent_Due_Amt AS VARCHAR)+' '+CAST(@mDPD AS VARCHAR)+''+CAST(@mPromise_Date AS VARCHAR)--PRINT @PrintVariable2----ENDCHECK------------------------------------------------------------IF @mDPD >= 30BEGINSELECT @tot_pay = SUM(CONVERT(FLOAT, C.PAY_AMT))FROM vwAplicablePayments CWHERE C.ACCT_NUM = @mAcct_Num2ANDC.ACTIVITY_DATE >= @mActivity_Date2ANDC.ACTIVITY_DATE < @mActivity_Date2 + 15----CHECK------------------------------------------------------------------------DECLARE @PrintVariable3 VARCHAR (8000)--SELECT @PrintVariable3 ='Greater=30 DOLLARS COLLECTED'--PRINT @PrintVariable3----ENDCHECK------------------------------------------------------------ENDELSE IF @mDPD < 30BEGINSELECT @tot_pay = SUM(CONVERT(FLOAT, C.PAY_AMT))FROM vwAplicablePayments CWHERE C.ACCT_NUM = @mAcct_Num2ANDC.ACTIVITY_DATE >= @mActivity_Date2ANDC.ACTIVITY_DATE BETWEEN @mActivity_Date2 AND@mPromise_Date + 5----CHECK----------------------------------------------------------------------DECLARE @PrintVariable4 VARCHAR (8000)--SELECT @PrintVariable4 ='Less 30 DOLLARS COLLECTED'--PRINT @PrintVariable4----END CHECK------------------------------------------------------------END----------------------------------------MY REVISEDLOGIC-------------------------------------------------------IF @rec_upd = 'N'BEGINIF @mDPD >= 30BEGINSELECT @mActivityDate2_temp = @mActivity_Date2 + 15--DECLARE @PrintVariable5 VARCHAR (8000)--SELECT @PrintVariable5 =' GREATER= 30 USING ACTVITY_DATE+15'--PRINT @PrintVariable5ENDELSE IF @mDPD < 30BEGINSELECT @mActivityDate2_temp = @mPromise_Date + 5--DECLARE @PrintVariable6 VARCHAR (8000)--SELECT @PrintVariable6 =' LESS 30 USING PROMISE_DATE+5'--PRINT @PrintVariable6ENDIF @tot_pay >= 0.9 * @mCurrent_Due_Amt--used to be promise amtBEGINUPDATE VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDSSET PROMISE_STATUS = 'PK',TOTAL_DOLLARS_COLL = @tot_payWHERE CURRENT OF ACT_CUR2--This statement updates the time that the status was placedinto PK.IF @mPromise_Status IN ('PTP','OP')BEGINUPDATE VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDSSET Status_Date = @todays_dateWHERE CURRENT OF ACT_CUR2ENDSELECT @rec_upd = 'Y 'ENDIF ((@tot_pay < 0.9 * @mCurrent_Due_Amt) OR @tot_pay IS NULL)AND( @mActivityDate2_temp > @todays_date )--need to put 1dayof month here for snapshot9/01/2004BEGINUPDATE VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDSSETPROMISE_STATUS = 'OP'WHERE CURRENT OF ACT_CUR2--This statement updates the time that the status was placedinto OP which is the original Activity Date.--The record will hold this date until it goes into PK,PB,orIP.IF @mPromise_Status IN ('PTP','OP')BEGINUPDATE VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDSSET Status_Date = @mActivity_Date2WHERE CURRENT OF ACT_CUR2ENDENDELSE IF ((@tot_pay < 0.9 * @mCurrent_Due_Amt) OR @tot_pay ISNULL)AND( @mActivityDate2_temp <= @todays_date )--need to put 1dayof month here for snapshot 9/01/2004BEGINUPDATE VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDSSETPROMISE_STATUS = 'PB',TOTAL_DOLLARS_COLL = case when @tot_pay is nullthen 0 else @tot_pay endWHERE CURRENT OF ACT_CUR2--This statement updates the time that the status was placedinto PB.IF @mPromise_Status IN ('PTP','OP')BEGINUPDATE VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDSSET Status_Date = @todays_dateWHERE CURRENT OF ACT_CUR2ENDENDENDELSE IF @rec_upd = 'Y'BEGINUPDATE VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDSSETPROMISE_STATUS = 'IP',TOTAL_DOLLARS_COLL = 0WHERE CURRENT OF ACT_CUR2--This statement updates the time that the status was placedinto IP.IF @mPromise_Status NOT IN ('IP')BEGINUPDATE VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDSSET Status_Date = @todays_dateWHERE CURRENT OF ACT_CUR2ENDENDFETCH NEXT FROM ACT_CUR2 INTO @mAcct_Num2,@mActivity_Date2,@mPromise_Amt_1,@mPromise_Status ,@mCurrent_Due_Amt,@mDPD,@mPromise_DateENDCLOSE ACT_CUR2DEALLOCATE ACT_CUR2FETCH NEXT FROM ACT_CUR1 INTO @mAcct_Num1 , @mDueDate1ENDCLOSE ACT_CUR1DEALLOCATE ACT_CUR1SET NOCOUNT OFFENDGO

View 15 Replies View Related

Why SSIS Package Slower And Slower

Mar 1, 2008

hi, friends, please look at this:

I have a SSIS package, and inside it I do something like below:

1. I have a SQL component, to give back a object to store the records.
2. I have a VB script component, I direct the object I got in 1 step into the script as a dataset.


My problem is:
I run the package in the SQL SERVER 2005 Store Procedue like this:

do
dtexec.exe package.dtsx
loop untill i>t

I control the it runs 30 times. But I found that the speed is slower and slower.
the first time, it takes about 600 s, but the last time, it takes the 1800 s.

Why?
The package don't drop the object it create during the loop in the Store Procedue ?
Thanks!

View 11 Replies View Related

Subquery Returned More Than 1 Value. This Is Not Permitted When The Subquery Follows =, !=, &<, &<= , &>, &>= Or When The Subquery Is Used As An Expression.

Apr 26, 2008

hello friends.. I am newbie for sql server...I having a problem when executing this procedure .... ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[spgetvalues]    @Uid intASBEGIN    SET NOCOUNT ON;        select                                  DATEPART(year, c.fy)as fy,                                                (select contribeamount from wh_contribute where and contribename like 'Retire-Plan B-1%      JRF' ) as survivorship,                (select contribeamount from wh_contribute where and contribename like  'Gross Earnings' and ) as ytdgross,                (select contribeamount from wh_contribute where and contribename like 'Retire-Plan B-1.5%      JRP') as totalcontrib,                                                       from    wh_contribute c                       where    c.uid=@Uid                 Order by fy Asc .....what is the wrong here??  " Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression."please reply asap... 

View 1 Replies View Related

Subquery Returned More Than 1 Value. This Is Not Permitted When The Subquery Follows =, !=, &<, &<= , &>, &>= Or When The Subquery Is Used As An Expression.

Jul 20, 2005

I am getting 2 resultsets depending on conditon, In the secondconditon i am getting the above error could anyone help me..........CREATE proc sp_count_AllNewsPapers@CustomerId intasdeclare @NewsId intset @NewsId = (select NewsDelId from NewsDelivery whereCustomerId=@CustomerId )if not exists(select CustomerId from NewsDelivery whereNewsPapersId=@NewsId)beginselect count( NewsPapersId) from NewsPapersendif exists(select CustomerId from NewsDelivery whereNewsPapersId=@NewsId)beginselect count(NewsDelId) from NewsDelivery whereCustomerid=@CustomeridendGO

View 3 Replies View Related

Analysis :: SSAS Calculation With Division Combined With A Time Calculation?

Sep 17, 2015

I have created calcalated measures in a SQL Server 2012 SSAS multi dimensional model by creating empty measures in the cube and use scope statements to fill the calculation.

(so I can use measure security on calculations

as explained here  )

SCOPE [Measures].[C];

THIS = IIF([B]=0,0,[Measures].[A]/[Measures].[B]);

View 2 Replies View Related

Converting Oracle Calculation To Sql Server 2005 Calculation

Jul 19, 2007

Hi I am having to convert some oracle reports to Reporting Services. Where I am having difficulty is with the

calculations.

Oracle

TO_DATE(TO_CHAR(Visit Date+Visit Time/24/60/60,'DD-Mon-YYYY HH24:MISS'),'DD-Mon-YYYY HH24:MISS')



this is a sfar as I have got with the sql version

SQLSERVER2005

= DateAdd("s",Fields!VISIT_DATE.Value,Fields!VISIT_TIME.Value246060 )



visit_date is date datatype visit_time is number datatype. have removed : from MI(here)SS as was showing as smiley.



using:

VS 2005 BI Tools

SQLServer 2005



View 5 Replies View Related

Subquery Returned More Than 1 Value. This Is Not Permitted When The Subquery Follows =, !=, &&<, &&<= , &&>, &&>= Or When The Subquery I

Mar 6, 2008

I am getting an error as

Msg 512, Level 16, State 1, Line 1

Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.

while running the following query.





SELECT DISTINCT EmployeeDetails.FirstName+' '+EmployeeDetails.LastName AS EmpName,

LUP_FIX_DeptDetails.DeptName AS CurrentDepartment,

LUP_FIX_DesigDetails.DesigName AS CurrentDesignation,

LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.ProjectName AS CurrentProject,

ManagerName=(SELECT E.FirstName+' '+E.LastName

FROM EmployeeDetails E

INNER JOIN LUP_EmpProject

ON E.Empid=LUP_EmpProject.Empid

INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails

ON LUP_EmpProject.Projectid = LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.Projectid

WHERE LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.Managerid = E.Empid)



FROM EmployeeDetails

INNER JOIN LUP_EmpDepartment

ON EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDepartment.Empid

INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_DeptDetails

ON LUP_EmpDepartment.Deptid=LUP_FIX_DeptDetails.Deptid

AND LUP_EmpDepartment.Date=(SELECT TOP 1 LUP_EmpDepartment.Date

FROM LUP_EmpDepartment

WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDepartment.Empid

ORDER BY LUP_EmpDepartment.Date DESC)

INNER JOIN LUP_EmpDesignation

ON EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDesignation.Empid

INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_DesigDetails

ON LUP_EmpDesignation.Desigid=LUP_FIX_DesigDetails.Desigid

AND LUP_EmpDesignation.Date=(SELECT TOP 1 LUP_EmpDesignation.Date

FROM LUP_EmpDesignation

WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpDesignation.Empid

ORDER BY LUP_EmpDesignation.Date DESC)

INNER JOIN LUP_EmpProject

ON EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpProject.Empid

AND LUP_EmpProject.StartDate=(SELECT TOP 1 LUP_EmpProject.StartDate

FROM LUP_EmpProject

WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=LUP_EmpProject.Empid

ORDER BY LUP_EmpProject.StartDate DESC)

INNER JOIN LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails

ON LUP_EmpProject.Projectid=LUP_FIX_ProjectDetails.Projectid



WHERE EmployeeDetails.Empid=1

PLEASE HELP.................

View 1 Replies View Related

Subquery Returned More Than 1 Value. This Is Not Permitted When The Subquery Follows =, !=, &&<, &&<= , &&>, &&>= Or When The Subquery I

May 14, 2008

Hi,

I've running the below query for months ans suddenly today started getting the following error :"Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression."

Any ideas as to why??

SELECT t0.DocNum, t0.Status, t0.ItemCode, t0.Warehouse, t0.OriginNum, t0.U_SOLineNo, ORDR.NumAtCard, ORDR.CardCode, OITM_1.U_Cultivar,
RDR1.U_Variety,
(SELECT OITM.U_Variety
FROM OWOR INNER JOIN
WOR1 ON OWOR.DocEntry = WOR1.DocEntry INNER JOIN
OITM INNER JOIN
OITB ON OITM.ItmsGrpCod = OITB.ItmsGrpCod ON WOR1.ItemCode = OITM.ItemCode
WHERE (OITB.ItmsGrpNam = 'Basic Fruit') AND (OWOR.DocNum = t0.DocNum)) AS Expr1, OITM_1.U_Organisation, OITM_1.U_Commodity,
OITM_1.U_Pack, OITM_1.U_Grade, RDR1.U_SizeCount, OITM_1.U_InvCode, OITM_1.U_Brand, OITM_1.U_PalleBase, OITM_1.U_Crt_Pallet,
OITM_1.U_LabelType, RDR1.U_DEPOT, OITM_1.U_PLU, RDR1.U_Trgt_Mrkt, RDR1.U_Wrap_Type, ORDR.U_SCCode
FROM OWOR AS t0 INNER JOIN
ORDR ON t0.OriginNum = ORDR.DocNum INNER JOIN
RDR1 ON ORDR.DocEntry = RDR1.DocEntry AND t0.U_SOLineNo - 1 = RDR1.LineNum INNER JOIN
OITM AS OITM_1 ON t0.ItemCode = OITM_1.ItemCode
WHERE (t0.Status <> 'L')

Thanks

Jacquues

View 4 Replies View Related

Subquery Returned More Than 1 Value But Work FINE (field_xxx=subquery)

Jul 19, 2007

Hi guys,



A have a problem that I need understand.... I have 2 server with the same configuration...



SERVER01:

-----------------------------------------------------

Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2191 (Intel IA-64)

Mar 27 2006 11:51:52

Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation

Enterprise Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 1)



sp_dboption 'BB_XXXXX'

The following options are set:

-----------------------------------

trunc. log on chkpt.

auto create statistics

auto update statistics

********************************

SERVER02:

-----------------------------------------------------

Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2191 (Intel IA-64)

Mar 27 2006 11:51:52

Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation

Enterprise Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 1)



sp_dboption 'BB_XXXXX'

The following options are set:

-----------------------------------

trunc. log on chkpt.

auto create statistics

auto update statistics



OK, the problem is that if a run the below query in server01, i get error 512:



Msg 512, Level 16, State 1, Line 1

Subquery returned more than 1 value. This is not permitted when the subquery follows =, !=, <, <= , >, >= or when the subquery is used as an expression.



But, if run the same query in the server02, the query work fine -.



I know that I can use IN, EXISTS, TOP, etc ... but I need understand this behavior.



Any idea WHY?



SELECT dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.dt_saldo,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.cd_indice_opf,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.cd_classificacao,

dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.ds_tipo_transacao ds_tipo_transacao_movimento ,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.ds_tipo_transacao ds_tipo_transacao_header,

'SD' ds_status_operacao,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.ds_tipo_opcao ,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.id_empresa,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.ic_empresa_cliente,

0 vl_entrada_compra_ctro ,0 vl_entrada_compra_premio,

0 vl_entrada_venda_ctro , 0 vl_entrada_venda_premio,

0 vl_saida_compra_ctro, 0 vl_saida_compra_premio,

0 vl_saida_venda_ctro, 0 vl_saida_venda_premio,

0 vl_lucro , 0 vl_prejuizo, 0 vl_naoexec_contrato,

0 vl_naoexec_premio,

sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_aprop_ganho) vl_aprop_ganho,

sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_aprop_perda) vl_aprop_perda,

sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_rever_ganho) vl_rever_ganho,

sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_rever_perda) vl_rever_perda,

sum(dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.vl_irrf) vl_irrf

FROM dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx,

dbo.opf_header_operacao ,

dbo.opf_movimento_operacao

WHERE dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.dt_saldo = '6-29-2007 0:0:0.000'

and ( dbo.opf_header_operacao.no_contrato = dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.no_contrato )

and ( dbo.opf_header_operacao.no_contrato = dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.no_contrato )

and ( dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.dt_pregao = (select (o.dt_pregao) from dbo.opf_movimento_operacao o

where o.no_contrato = dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.no_contrato and o.dt_pregao <='6-28-2007 0:0:0.000' ) )

and (dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.ic_tipo_saldo = 'S')

group by dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.dt_saldo,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.cd_indice_opf,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.cd_classificacao,

dbo.opf_movimento_operacao.ds_tipo_transacao,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.ds_tipo_transacao ,

ds_status_operacao,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.ds_tipo_opcao ,

dbo.opf_header_operacao.id_empresa,

dbo.opf_saldo_ctb_opc_flx.ic_empresa_cliente



Thanks

Nilton Pinheiro

View 9 Replies View Related

Adding Product Of A Subquery To A Subquery Fails?

Jul 6, 2014

I am trying to add the results of both of these queries together:

The purpose of the first query is to find the number of nulls in the TimeZone column.

Query 1:

SELECT COUNT(*) - COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename

The purpose of the second query is to find results in the AAST, AST, etc timezones.

Query 2:

SELECT COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename
WHERE TimeZone NOT IN ('EST', 'MST', 'PST', 'CST')

Note: both queries produce a whole number with no decimals. Ran individually both queries produce accurate results. However, what I would like is one query which produced a single INT by adding both results together. For example, if Query 1 results to 5 and query 2 results to 10, I would like to see a single result of 15 as the output.

What I came up with (from research) is:

SELECT ((SELECT COUNT(*) - COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename) + (SELECT COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename
WHERE TimeZone NOT IN ('EST', 'MST', 'PST', 'CST'))

I get a msq 102, level 15, state 1 error.

I also tried

SELECT ((SELECT COUNT(*) - COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename) + (SELECT COUNT (TimeZone)
FROM tablename
WHERE TimeZone NOT IN ('EST', 'MST', 'PST', 'CST')) as IVR_HI_n_AK_results

but I still get an error. For the exact details see:

[URL]

NOTE: the table in query 1 and query 2 are the same table. I am using T-SQL in SQL Server Management Studio 2008.

View 6 Replies View Related

Why Does 8 Bcp's Run Slower Than 4 Bcp's?

Mar 22, 2007

I am not sure if this is the correct forum but here goes!

We rebuilt our SqlServer 2000 Trans replication the other night. It used to run in 3 hours but now it runs in 9.5 hours (7 hours bcp out, 2.5 hours bcp in). We have a dedicated distributor box (4 processors), a 4 processor publisher, and a 2 processor subscriber. None of the systems exhibited any processor stress or unusual disk activity. The network tests OK (tested with file xfers). But the bcp's wrote data at 2.5 to 4 minutes per 100k rows, and they loaded the data at about 100k rows in 10 seconds or less.

As you know, Replication Snapshot uses bcp on each source table to build a collection of flat-files. Then it uses bcp to load those files into the subscribing tables. Because bcp is the workhhorse here, I decided against posting this in the Replication forum.

The only change I know of is increasing MaxBcpThreads from 4 to 8. This parameter specifies the number of bulk-copy operations that can be performed in parallel. I was thinking that 8 bcp's might somehow be killing the drive where all the bcp files are written.

Any ideas?

View 2 Replies View Related

Everything Slower With SP2?

Apr 12, 2007

I installed SP2 two days ago and it seems like my SSIS-packes now take longer time than before - the very opposite of what I was hoping for.



Anyway, here are some data from runs on our performance environment. No new data is added to the source database between the runs, but I do a full process of the cubes every time (time is in seconds):



Package...............................SP1...............................SP2

Load dimensions..................200.................................270

Load fact data.......................800...............................1600

Process cubes....................2100...............................2600



So, as you can see, everything is going slower with SP2. I have yet to look into if there are any specific steps in the packages that take longer time than before, but it's odd that all packages take a longer time to execute. Especially that cube processing is slower suprises me.



Has anyone experienced something similar? Thanks!

View 10 Replies View Related

Query Slower When Run All Together

Nov 14, 2000

Hi gurus
I haven't put the code in since I've tried several variations & keep having the same problem: I'm hoping someone will recognise the problem from a description of it.

There are two parts to my query.

* Part 1 creates and then populates a temporary table

* Part 2 is a select query which joins the temporary table to a permanent table, on 2 fields including a datetime field. The data types on each side of the join are identical.

If I run the first part of the query through ISQL and wait for it to complete before running the second part (in the same ISQL window), it (the second part) takes just 3 minutes. However, if I run both parts together, the second part takes ages, in fact I'm not sure if it completes at all (could wait indefinately!).

I tried placing a 'GO' between the two queries when running them together, but it didn't seem to help.

Please help, I'm stumped.
Thanks
Jo

View 1 Replies View Related

Run Database Slower

Oct 13, 2004

I have database, Visual basic as front end, and sql server as backend, the reports are using crystal report. Recently, the user complain it is too slow to run, it took a long to load the data, anybody help me? Thanks in advance.

View 3 Replies View Related

Is SSIS Slower Than DTS????!!!!!!

Oct 29, 2005

I am new to SSIS and probably doing some mistake while transferring data from oracle source to oracle destination.  Please guide me..   In our project we need to transfer nearly 80 GB data from old system (Oracle 9i) to new system (Oracle 10 G Release 2). To do this exercise we are testing and comparing performance and cost effectiveness between different tools like SSIS, DTS and SQL * Loader (oracle built in tool).   We have selected one table, which is having 40 fields with 3 million records. The destination table is also having same structure.    Surprisingly SSIS is giving slower performance than DTS!!!!! It is taking more than two hours or nearly two hours. I have tested the same process 3 times.   I have used two servers (1 GB RAM, Dual processor) for source and destination with minimum load and used data flow task (OLEDB Source and OLEDB Destination).   In case of transferring data from Oracle to SQL SERVER I am finding €œFast Loading Option€? in data access mode, which is giving considerable performance boosting. But while transferring data from Oracle to Oracle I am not finding €œFast Loading Option€? !!!!!!!!!   For performance boosting which provider I should use??   Please suggest me€¦ if any one can€¦ would remain grateful to him€¦   Thanks and Regards Sudripta Rakshit.        

View 18 Replies View Related

Same Procedure With Different Name Run Much Slower

Jan 14, 2008

I copied a code from one proc and created new proc with the same code but different name. Using the same parameter for both procedures I got the different time of execution. New one is 4 times slower. I went through execution plan and could not find any changes. Does anyone have any experiance like this?

View 2 Replies View Related

DB Connections Slower Over Time

Feb 2, 2007

Hi,We have a C# web application that has been running for a few years now with little maintenance.  Over the past few months, we have had some increasing problems.1.  Loses session frequently ~ every 2-3 minutes.2.  Occasionally (every 2 months) get out of memory exceptions.3.  Connections to the DB and therefore the whole site run fast after restart.  Gets continuously slower and slower over time until it starts throwing timeouts: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed
prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding.  The timeouts usually come every 3 weeks or so. Number 3 is the biggest problem for us, but I thought maybe 1 or 2 give some indication to why 3 is happening?I don't have much time to look into this now as I'm working on another project, but I was hoping that maybe someone would have ideas just looking at our symptoms.Thank you so much,Christie  

View 4 Replies View Related

Multi Processor Is Slower

May 3, 2001

I know this won't be a lot to go on but, we has a quad processor box that is doing a lot of sql crunching. When we turn off three of the processors it runs the SQL queries faster. The requests are comming from COM objects. CPU, Memory, page faults, all that stuff is fine. Also SQL dosen't appear to be using all the processors as only 1 has any amount of usage?. Any suggestions of where to start would be most appreaciated.

Mike

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Query Running Much Slower Than EM

Jun 12, 2002

Ok,
here's a funky one That I can't find an expanation for. If I go into EM and choose a table from a database and return all rows, I get immediate results and can start browsing records. If I go into query analyzer and do a select * on the same table, it takes up to 20-25 minutes to return the result set. This used to only take like 5 mins. What gives? Anyone seen this before?

View 1 Replies View Related

BCP Slower Standalone Vs. A/P Cluster ???

Aug 24, 2004

I have an issue with the BCP util, it is extremely slow when running a BCP in to the same database on an A/P cluster vs. Standalone system. It is a vendor application, so I have little control as to what I can do. The BCP runs from a jobserver (remote) through the network, but it runs the same way in the standalone system, yet the process is about 10X as slow with the cluster, and the only diff is cluster vs. standalone.

SQLClusterName is specified in -S, not the active node, and it uses a trusted connection, not a local account. Is there anything about a cluster config that would cause the BCP to run slower ?

Any thoughts ??


Thanks,
Paul

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 50% Slower Than 2000

Mar 29, 2007

Hi there,

I am an application programmer who uses SQL Server; I'm not an expert and just know the basics. Our application has approximately 300 SQL tables and each table has just one primary index. We don't have stored procedures and only have 3 Views that a couple of reports use. Our database is approximately 26GB in size. We are planning on migrating from SQL 2000/Windows Server 2000 to SQL 2005/Windows Server 2003. Before doing this I decided to do some bench mark testing. I chose a simple SELECT statement on one of our larger tables. On SQL 2000 it ran in 22 seconds whereas on SQL 2005 it ran in 34 seconds.



These are the steps I have done to try and improve performance, all to no avail.

I tried both a passive and active upgrade and the results were the same. The passive way was to remove 2000, install 2005, create a new database and restore from a 2000 backup into the new 2005 database. The active way was to leave 2000 on the server with the database attached and upgrading to 2005.
I did not change any defaults on the database except I have set the compatibility level to SQL 2005.
The collation is set to SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS.

I have run an Optimize Index Task.
I have run a Rebuild Index Task.
I have run an Update Statistics Task.
I have defragged the drive that the database resides on.

Can anyone explain why SQL 2003 is dramatically slower than 2000? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

View 20 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 50% Slower Than 2000

Mar 29, 2007

Hi there,

I am an application programmer who uses SQL Server; I'm not an expert and just know the basics. Our application has approximately 300 SQL tables and each table has just one primary index. We don't have stored procedures and only have 3 Views that a couple of reports use. Our database is approximately 26GB in size. We are planning on migrating from SQL 2000/Windows Server 2000 to SQL 2005/Windows Server 2003. Before doing this I decided to do some bench mark testing. I chose a simple SELECT statement on one of our larger tables. On SQL 2000 it ran in 22 seconds whereas on SQL 2005 it ran in 34 seconds.

These are the steps I have done to try and improve performance, all to no avail.

I tried both a passive and active upgrade and the results were the same. The passive way was to remove 2000, install 2005, create a new database and restore from a 2000 backup into the new 2005 database. The active way was to leave 2000 on the server with the database attached and upgrading to 2005.
I did not change any defaults on the database except I have set the compatibility level to SQL 2005.
The collation is set to SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS.

I have run an Optimize Index Task.
I have run a Rebuild Index Task.
I have run an Update Statistics Task.
I have defragged the drive that the database resides on.
Can anyone explain why SQL 2003 is dramatically slower than 2000?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 50% Slower Than SQL 2000

Mar 29, 2007

Hi there,



I am an application programmer who uses SQL Server; I'm not an expert and just know the basics. Our application has approximately 300 SQL tables and each table has just one primary index. We don't have stored procedures and only have 3 Views that a couple of reports use. Our database is approximately 26GB in size. We are planning on migrating from SQL 2000/Windows Server 2000 to SQL 2005/Windows Server 2003. Before doing this I decided to do some bench mark testing. I chose a simple SELECT statement on one of our larger tables. On SQL 2000 it ran in 22 seconds whereas on SQL 2005 it ran in 34 seconds.



These are the steps I have done to try and improve performance, all to no avail.

I tried both a passive and active upgrade and the results were the same. The passive way was to remove 2000, install 2005, create a new database and restore from a 2000 backup into the new 2005 database. The active way was to leave 2000 on the server with the database attached and upgrading to 2005.
I did not change any defaults on the database except I have set the compatibility level to SQL 2005.
The collation is set to SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS.
I have run an Optimize Index Task.
I have run a Rebuild Index Task.
I have run an Update Statistics Task.
I have defragged the drive that the database resides on.

Can anyone explain why SQL 2003 is dramatically slower than 2000? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

View 5 Replies View Related

Function Is 10 Times Slower Than SP

Mar 24, 2007

Hi all,

In order to return a table for a specific input parameter, I am using Function, but the performance is just awful! After I have tried same code as SP, the whole thing is running under 1 sec (like 0.5 sec), while the function is about 10 times slow (4-6 sec). I know in SQL 2000 function is slower than SP, but that cannot be as bad as 10 times slower.

Now, in order to use that table from SP, I have to create a temp table, then insert result into that temp table, before I can direct use any "select" sentence. Any explanation here? Or how to "select" from a SP directly?

Thanks,

Ning



View 2 Replies View Related

Is The RDA PULL Slower In SQL Mobile Vs. SQL CE 2.0?

Jan 4, 2007

I have a CF application I'm porting from VS2003/SQL CE 2.0 to VS2005/SQL Mobile. I make extensive use of RDA and unfortunately there is a huge performance degredation for me going to SQL Mobile. Where most PULL's in 2.0 take no more than a second or 2 to complete, they are taking around 10 or 11 seconds in SQL Mobile. This is the time from when .PULL starts and ends, it does not include any code run before or after the .PULL is issued, so it definitely something during the PULL that is slower.

I have tried settins of 0,1,3, and 6 for the compression level, all gave similar results, around 10 or 11 seconds. I have also tried doing a .SubmitSQL right before the .PULL to see if a sort of cached connection would help, but it only shaved a second off the time in most cases.

These times are using the same IIS server, SQL server (2000 SP3a), and database. I have tried using a 2003 SE device, WM 5.0 device, WM 5.0 emulator, and 2003 SE emulator, all exhibit the same performance degradation.

I really need to figure this out or I can't move the product to 2005 as the synchronization times would be completely unacceptable to our customers. Has anyone else run into this problem or know of a solution to it?

Thanks!

-Manny

View 1 Replies View Related

UDF 10x Slower Than Select Query It Contains

Apr 19, 2006

I have a table valued UDF with only one SELECT query. It selects from a View, and has a couple of joins and calls another UDF in the WHERE clause. When I run the Select query itself it's duration is around 120, but when I have it wrapped in a UDF, it's around 1200!

ALTER FUNCTION [dbo].[fnGetiii]
(
bla bla bla
)
RETURNS @ItemTable TABLE
(
a varchar(2),
b bigint,
c smallmoney,
d varchar(50),
e varchar(50),
f int,
g varchar(50),
h datetime,
i int,
j int,
k int
)
AS
BEGIN
INSERT INTO @ItemTable
(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k)
SELECT
vat.a AS a,
vat.b AS b,
vat.c AS c,
vat.d AS d,
vat.e AS e,
vat.f AS f,
vat.g AS g,
vat.h AS h,
vat.i AS i,
vat.j AS j,
vat.k AS k
FROM dbo.vw_jkl vat
LEFT JOIN dbo.uio uio
LEFT JOIN dbo.iop iop
ON (iop.kko = uio.kko)
ON (uio.jj = vat.jj)
WHERE this = that AND
this = that AND
this IN (SELECT iii FROM dbo.fniiireturn(pppp))

RETURN
END

How can I speed it up?


View 5 Replies View Related

Why Is Getdate() Slower Than DATEADD()

Aug 22, 2007

I was tasked with optimizing a query that was taking about 2.5 minutes to run. It is now running in 2 seconds, so great, it's working....except I don't understand why. The ONLY change made is the where...

Here is the origional




Code Snippet

WHERE (j.datelaunched > GETDATE() - 7 OR (j.jobtype_id = 2 AND j.datecreated > GETDATE() - 30)

Here is the optomized




Code Snippet

WHERE (j.datelaunched >= DATEADD(DD, DATEDIFF(DD,0,GETDATE() - 7), 0) OR (j.jobtype_id = 2 AND j.datecreated >= DATEADD(DD, DATEDIFF(DD,0,GETDATE() - 30), 0)))

View 10 Replies View Related

VARCHAR(3500) Slower Than TEXT?

May 9, 2005

I have a table in which 2 of the fields are defined as TEXT. It was determined that neither of these fields would have to hold more than 3500 characters, so I changed both fields to VARCHAR (3500). The problem is that any query against this table takes 20 seconds to run. When the fields were defined as data type TEXT, queries ran lick-itty-split!? I would have expected just the opposite. Can someone explain this behavior?

View 1 Replies View Related

Usage Cindex Slower That Index?

Sep 3, 2004

I've got a table with a pk (bigint, no autoincrement) that has a clustered index. Same table has an integer field with a non-unique index on it.

When I do a count(*) on the table, the non-unique index is used (20m rows, 12 secs). When I force the count(*) to use the clustered index, it takes 43 secs. When selecting rows, usually the clustered index is used.

So I'm curious as to why the count(*) uses the non-unique index and the others don't. I've noticed it's faster but, why? Any ideas/considerations?

View 4 Replies View Related

MSDE Running Much Slower Than Access DB??

Feb 19, 2004

I have a large VB 6.0 application running with Jet 4.0 Access DB. I am considering moving the DB to MSDE. For testing, I installed MSDE on another computer in a peer to peer network running XP sp1, loaded up the DB from Access to MSDE2000A -- all without problem. (I should add the obvious fact I am new to using SQL server.)

What I find is that with a relatively small test DB, running just a single instance of the application, query response from MSDE is taking several seconds (4-5 second lag) longer than response from the Access DB, which runs extremely fast. This is with the Access DB installed on the same network drive, running the same application and the same queries syntax -- only changing configuration of connection for each (SQL vs Jet 4).

Any clues as to what may be going on? The lag time is unacceptable. I am using SQL password instead of NT security. It seems the process is perhaps lagging in the process of authorization.

Thanks for any suggestions or ideas on this.

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved