IO Bottleneck

Mar 18, 2004

Hi,

We have been getting really bad performance from one of our databases recently.

This is a three tier system with two services (.dll) connecting to the database, we have only experienced problems since the second service has been installed.

These two services both use the same user and make about 300 connections to the database.

I have noticed IO bottleneck when the system is under load, and the Average disk queue at this time is 15.

How do I fix this? We have the logs and data on the same raid 10 array.

View 10 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Memory Bottleneck?

Feb 15, 2005

I am trying to figure out if we have a memory bottlneck on our SQL Server. We have a large database (90 GB) on Standard Edition of SQL 2000. Currently we have 2 GB of Memory. To me this seems low already, but Standard edition can't handle more than 2 GB anyway. Our cache hit ratio is very low (40%). This is also telling me we need memory. The thing that gets me is we still have 147 MB of memory available. If Memory really was the problem wouldn't that 147 MB be used?

Thanks much.

View 14 Replies View Related

I/O Bottleneck With SQL Agent

Mar 29, 2007

Hello,
I have an SP that transfers data from one DB to another.
As I run the SP with the management studio - it takes about 15min. But when I scheduled it as an SQL agent job it ran all night and never completed.


The difference I noticed was that the % disk time (of the destination DB) was very high (~100) when I used the agent (which never happened when I ran the SP with the studio).
Only when I restart the SQL service, the disk gets back to normal % disk time.

What could be the reason for that?

My server - Windows 2003 R2 SP1 / SQL 2005 SP2


p.s - could it be related to SQL SP2 ? I didn't have this problem with SP1, but then - I had many other changes since.

View 3 Replies View Related

Processor Bottleneck On Server

Aug 6, 1999

Good morning,

I've just updated my databases to V7.0 from 6.5. I am having some issues with CPU utilization after rebuilding the databases. I rebuilt the databases from scripts after modifying the scripts to deal with any SQL issues between the versions.

Symptoms:

When a bunch of stored procedures are executed the % Processor Time his 100% on a single processor system, the Processor Queue Length hits 13, the Batch Request/Sec starts at 20 and rises to 47 before dropping off, Context Switches go from 370/sec to about 833/sec before dropping off and there is an increase in page faulting.

My testing was done on a single processor but my real system is dual-300+ with 128Mb RAM. The database is only 40Mb and after running the index wizard there were no changes advised.

After reading a lot in help areas for MS and here I am not sure if this has to do with how SQL Server runs now (i.e. system configuration) or if it is a query issue with parallelism. I'm assuming query parallelism since the performance spikes occur when stored procedures are run. On a single processor is there a way to address this. Then, hopefully, I can deal with the real multiprocessor system.

Thanks much,

Don

View 1 Replies View Related

I/O Component Bottleneck Theory

Jul 20, 2005

I understand that there is much involved in figuring up I/Othroughput, but I'm hoping the answer to the following question willbe a simple A, B OR C.Given the configuration below, what hardware component wouldbottleneck first.A. Drive Spindle ThroughputB. SCSI ControllerC. Other Component(if so what component?)Configuration:Controller: Ultra320RAID Config: RAID 5Drives on RAID: 14 - 73gb/15k - SCSI DrivesType of Writes: RandomQuestion Background:I currently have the configuration above on a local box. Our companyhas ordered a SAN and and has space set aside. What I'm trying toacertain is whether or not I'd be better off staying local or ifputting my DB on a SAN would be more beneficial.Other Notes:I've determined using a formula that determines the max theoreticalI/O operations/sec for the # of drives (spindles) and RAID Config...but I've not been able to establish a relationship betweenOperation/sec -> MB/Sec. I'm sure this is for obvious reasons...If anyone has had a related scenario, I'd be interested in hearingyour thoughts.Thanks,Ornac

View 9 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved