IS NULL Queries With LinqDataSource
Nov 30, 2007
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to query a database table using LinqDataSource and get the rows 'WHERE ParentId IS NULL'. I set the AutoGenerateWhereClause to True, catch the Selecting event and set ParentId to null like so:protected void MyLinqDataSource_Selecting(object sender, LinqDataSourceSelectEventArgs e)
{
e.WhereParameters["ParentId"] = null;// this doesn't work - why?
}
but this is ignored. I've also tried e.WhereParameters["ParentId"] = DBNull.Value;
but this doesn't work either!
Is there a way of doing this?
Thanks!
View 11 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Dec 30, 2007
Not sure where the best place to ask this question is so I will ask it here. I am trying to use the LinqDataSource ASP.NET 3.5 control and am having a problem with using the Where attribute. I have a field that I want to filter on that is an Enumeration, however if I try to put the integer value in the Where attribute the page will not compile. How do I use enum values in the Where attribute?
I have something like this:
public enum EventType{ Charger = 0, Location = 1, Scanner = 2}
I want to filter the LinqDataSource like this:
<asp:LinqDataSource ID="DataSource1" runat="server" ContextTypeName="MyDataContext" Table="Events" Where="EventType = 2" />
This won't work. The EventType property is an instance of the enum type above.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2008
Dear allIn Visual Studio 2008,Shall I use the SqlDataSource or LinqDataSource when I try to retrieve data rows in SQL Server?I do not know how to write SqlConnection code to connect SQL Server, but also know how to use Linq to SQL class.Which one is better?Can LinqDataSource replace SqlDataSource?Thanks for your reply.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2005
For some reason my Stored Procs are not recognizing NULL values within my database:For example:Select *From ResultsWhere(home_Phone IS NULL)All the home_Phone vaules that are NULL are not being picked up by the query. Any ideas are appriciated. Thanks in advance everyone. RB
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2007
Hi,
Using VS.NET 2008 Beta2, and SQL Server 2005.
I have a gridview bound to a linq data source, and when trying to update a row, I get an exception that no rows were modified.
The query generated is:
UPDATE [dbo].[package]
SET [owner_id] = @p5
WHERE ([package_id] = @p0) AND ([title] = @p1) AND ([directory] = @p2) AND ([owner_id] = @p3) AND ([creation_date] = @p4)
-- @p0: Input Int32 (Size = 0; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [20006]
-- @p1: Input String (Size = 22; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [Visual Studio.NET 2005]
-- @p2: Input String (Size = 26; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [MSI_Visual_Studio.NET_2005]
-- @p3: Input Int32 (Size = 0; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [10000]
-- @p4: Input DateTime (Size = 0; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [11/07/2007 12:00:00 a.m.]
-- @p5: Input Int32 (Size = 0; Prec = 0; Scale = 0) [10001]
-- Context: SqlProvider(Sql2005) Model: AttributedMetaModel Build: 3.5.20706.1
If I run it manually on sql server, it fails until the directory column is removed. The type is varchar(50), with a uniqueness constraint. However, this is same type as the title column, which doesn't have this problem.
Thanks,
Jessica
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2006
Hey. I need to substitute a value from a table if the input var is null. This is fine if the value coming from table is not null. But, it the table value is also null, it doesn't work. The problem I'm getting is in the isnull line which is in Dark green color because @inFileVersion is set to null explicitly and when the isnull function evaluates, value returned from DR.FileVersion is also null which is correct. I want the null=null to return true which is why i set ansi_nulls off. But it doesn't return anything. And the select statement should return something but in my case it returns null. If I comment the isnull statements in the where clause, everything works fine. Please tell me what am I doing wrong. Is it possible to do this without setting the ansi_nulls to off??? Thank you
set ansi_nulls off
go
declare
@inFileName VARCHAR (100),
@inFileSize INT,
@Id int,
@inlanguageid INT,
@inFileVersion VARCHAR (100),
@ExeState int
set @inFileName = 'A0006337.EXE'
set @inFileSize = 28796
set @Id= 1
set @inlanguageid =null
set @inFileVersion =NULL
set @ExeState =0
select Dr.StateID from table1 dR
where
DR.[FileName] = @inFileName
AND DR.FileSize =@inFileSize
AND DR.FileVersion = isnull(@inFileVersion,DR.FileVersion)
AND DR.languageid = isnull(@inlanguageid,null)
AND DR.[ID]= @ID
)
go
set ansi_nulls on
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 20, 2015
In my report i have CNAME parameter , which allows null value. I checked Allow null value check box in report parameter properties.
when i preview the report , it displays checked NULL check box beside CNAME parameter . I want to give some meaningful name(i.e.ALLCustomers) to this checkbox instead of NULL.
Is it possible through SSRS designer?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 15, 2015
I have a flat file with the following columns
SampleID Rep_Number Product Protein Fat Solids
In the flat file SampleID and Product are populated in the first row only, rest of the rows only have values for Rep_Number, Protein, Fat, Solids.
SampleID and Product are blank for the rest of the rows. So my task is to fill those blank rows with the first row that has the sampleID and Product and load into the table.
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2007
I have a report that is run on a monthly basis with a default date of null. The stored procedure determines the month-end date that it should use should it be sent a null date.
The report works fine when I tell it to create a history entry; however, when I try to add a subscription it doesn't appear to like the null parameter value. Since I have told the report to have a default value of null it doesn't allow me to enter a value on the subscription page.
Now, I suppose I could remove the parameter altogether from the stored proc, but then the users would never be able to run the report for a previous time period. Can someone explain to me why default values aren't allowed to be used on subscriptions when they seem to work fine for ad hoc and scheduled reports? This is really quite frustrating as most of my reports require a date value and default to null so that the user doesn't have to enter them for the latest data.
An internal error occurred on the report server. See the error log for more details. (rsInternalError) Get Online Help
Key cannot be null. Parameter name: key
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 5, 2007
I run a stored procedure for which I have a return variable. The stored procedure returns the ID of a row in a table if it exists:
m_sqlCmd.ExecuteScalar();
The m_sqlCmd has been fed an SQLParameter with direction set to output.
When the stored proc returns, I want to test it. Now when there IS a row it returns the ID ok.
When the row doesn't exist, in my watch I have:
m_sqlParam.SqlValue with value {Null}
I can't seem to work out how to test this value out.
I've tried several things but none seem to work.
This line compiles ok, but the following runs into the IF statement as if the SqlValue is null??
if (m_sqlParam.SqlValue != null)....
{
// I'm here!! I thought the watch says this is null???
}
Sorry if this is obvious, but I can't work this one out!!
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2007
Looks like there was a fix and then I read this fix is not a fix. Does anyone know how this can be rectified? Does it mean that only Windows authentiation is the only way it works. The Software is over 2 years old, there are no excuses.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2007
I am getting this error: "Cannot insert the value NULL into column 'OrderID', table 'outman.outman.Contact'; column does not allow nulls. INSERT fails." -- But my value is not null. I did a response.write on it and it show the value. Of course, it would be nice if I could do a breakpoint but that doesn't seem to be working. I'll attach a couple of images below of my code, the error, and the breakpoint error.
Server Error in '/' Application.
Cannot insert the value NULL into column 'OrderID', table 'outman.outman.Contact'; column does not allow nulls. INSERT fails.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Cannot insert the value NULL into column 'OrderID', table 'outman.outman.Contact'; column does not allow nulls. INSERT fails.Source Error:
Line 89: sContact.Phone = sPhone.Text.Trim
Line 90: sContact.Email = sEmail.Text.Trim
Line 91: sContact.Save()
Line 92:
Line 93: Dim bContact As Contact = New Contact()Source File: F:InetpubwwwrootOutman KnifeCheckout.aspx.vb Line: 91 Stack Trace:
[SqlException (0x80131904): Cannot insert the value NULL into column 'OrderID', table 'outman.outman.Contact'; column does not allow nulls. INSERT fails.]
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) +857354
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) +734966
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj) +188
System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj) +1838
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.HasMoreRows() +150
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.ReadInternal(Boolean setTimeout) +214
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.Read() +9
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.CompleteExecuteScalar(SqlDataReader ds, Boolean returnSqlValue) +39
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteScalar() +148
SubSonic.SqlDataProvider.ExecuteScalar(QueryCommand qry) +209
SubSonic.DataService.ExecuteScalar(QueryCommand cmd) +37
SubSonic.ActiveRecord`1.Save(String userName) +120
SubSonic.ActiveRecord`1.Save() +31
Checkout.btnCheckout_Click(Object sender, EventArgs e) in F:InetpubwwwrootOutman KnifeCheckout.aspx.vb:91
System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.OnClick(EventArgs e) +105
System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) +107
System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.System.Web.UI.IPostBackEventHandler.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) +7
System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(IPostBackEventHandler sourceControl, String eventArgument) +11
System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(NameValueCollection postData) +33
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +5102
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.42; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.42
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2004
I would drop and add the table but the data can't be deleted. So if anyone could help with the statement it would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2004
I'm trying to set the concat... option to OFF
all the time and in all my databases
I tried this command
USE master
EXEC sp_dboption 'DatabaseName', 'concat null yields null', 'FALSE'
but it doesn't change anything
Select NULL + 'TOTO'
----> NULL
(it should be 'TOTO')
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2005
hi,my structure table in database:Amount float(53) not null default 0when i try to run his script:alter table ABC alter column Amount float(53) nullit can only set the Amount to allow null, but can't set the defaultvalue to empty.anyone know how to set the field to allow null and default set toempty, no value.thanks
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2015
It's giving me an error while I'm trying to change column value from not null to null..
'tblid' table
- Unable to modify table.
Cannot insert the value NULL into column 'ValidID', table 'Xe01.dbo.Tmp_tblid'; column does not allow nulls. INSERT fails.
The statement has been terminated.
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2006
Hello.
I've built a sample CLR function with the following declaration....
CREATE FUNCTION GetManager(@DeptCode nvarchar(3))
RETURNS nvarchar(1000)
WITH RETURNS NULL ON NULL INPUT
AS
EXTERNAL NAME Assembly1.[ClassLibrary1.MyVBClass].MyManager
And it works as expected, except when I use NULL:
DECLARE @MyManager nvarchar(1000)
EXEC @MyManager = dbo.GetManager NULL
PRINT @MyManager
It returns the value "Unknown" as it would have for any unknown DeptCode, as-programmed.
I'm of the theory it should have returned NULL without actually firing the function? Or is this only for non-CLR items... or stored procedures, not functions?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 27, 2015
We have a case where in we should show date based on conditions for e.g if we had a column defined as
col varchar(10) then we would show col as 'NULL' for some condition and actual value when no condition
Normaly date values are stored here e.g under col 20150901 .
Case
when col>'20150901' then 'NULL'
else col
end as Derivedcol
Note this is an extract process and we are presenting data by pumping the data in a table .
Now there is another similar column -colz varchar(10) which stores date but doesnt have case condition so whenever date has no value its shows null which is database null.
So whats the difference between database null and string null ?
How can we show database null for the case condition instead of string "null"?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
HelloWhen I use a PreparedStatement (in jdbc) with the following query:SELECT store_groups_idFROM store_groupsWHERE store_groups_id IS NOT NULLAND type = ?ORDER BY group_nameIt takes a significantly longer time to run (the time it takes forexecuteQuery() to return ) than if I useSELECT store_groups_idFROM store_groupsWHERE store_groups_id IS NOT NULLAND type = 'M'ORDER BY group_nameAfter tracing the problem down, it appears that this is not preciselya java issue, but rather has to do with the underlying cost of runningparameterized queries.When I open up MS Enterprise Manager and type the same query in - italso takes far longer for the parameterized query to run when I usethe version of the query with bind (?) parameters.This only happens when the table in question is large - I am seeingthis behaviour for a table with > 1,000,000 records. It doesn't makesense to me why a parameterized query would run SLOWER than acompletely ad-hoc query when it is supposed to be more efficient.Furthermore, if one were to say that the reason for this behaviour isthat the query is first getting compliled and then the parameters aregetting sent over - thus resulting in a longer percieved executiontime - I would respond that if this were the case then A) it shouldn'tbe any different if it were run against a large or small table B) thisperformance hit should only be experienced the first time that thequery is run C) the performance hit should only be 2x the time for thenon-parameterized query takes to run - the difference in response timeis more like 4-10 times the time it takes for the non parameterizedversion to run!!!Is this a sql-server specific problem or something that would pertainto other databases as well? I there something about the coorect use ofbind parameters that I overall don't understand?If I can provide some hints in Java then this would be great..otherwise, do I need to turn/off certain settings on the databaseitself?If nothing else works, I will have to either find or write a wrapperaround the Statement object that acts like a prepared statement but inreality sends regular Statement objects to the JDBC driver. I wouldthen put some inteligence in the database layer for deciding whetherto use this special -hack- object or a regular prepared statementdepending on the expected overhead. (Obviously this logic would onlybe written in once place.. etc.. IoC.. ) HOWEVER, I would desperatelywant to avoid doing this.Please help :)
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2000
I have two columns A (which allows nulls) and B( which does not allow nulls).
How can I add the contents of columns A and B SO THAT I DO NOT GET A NULL RESULT WHEN A IS NULL.
The result of A+B concatanation will be stored in a column, C.
Appreciate your help
Ziggy
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 25, 2007
Hi guys,
I've got a query on a particular table returning an odd result:
SELECT DISTINCT WorkStation
FROM Invoice
WHERE WorkStation Is Not Null
ORDER BY WorkStation
This query returns the rows I'd expect plus a null row. This doesn't happen in databases at other sites, or in other tables at this site. The following query behaves as I'd expect returning only non-null AccountNumbers.
SELECT DISTINCT AccountNumber
FROM Suppliers
WHERE AccountNumber Is Not Null
ORDER BY AccountNumber
I can't reproduce these results on another site on a table of the same structure, or on another table at this site.
Any suggestions as to what might be going on?
Pertinent info:
---
select @@Version
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.760 (Intel X86)
Dec 17 2002 14:22:05 Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation
Standard Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 1)
---
dbcc checkdb
Abridged result:
CHECKDB found 0 allocation errors and 0 consistency errors in database 'POS'.
---
SELECT * INTO #Inv FROM Invoice
SELECT DISTINCT WorkStation
FROM #Inv
WHERE WorkStation Is Not Null
ORDER BY WorkStation
Does not reproduce this problem (and so is a probable fix) but the questions remains, what causes this?
TIA,
Karl.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2015
I have 595 default constraints in my database. I can return a list of them using the following:
select * from sys.default_constraints
Is there a way I can return a list of just the ones where NULL is still allowed? I want to update all of the columns with a default value to not allow NULLs.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2007
Dear folks,
please tell me the query for altering a column from not null to null
Vinod
View 15 Replies
View Related
Feb 28, 2008
Hi all,
One of my columns is the table has some Null values, and I Would like to stop having NULL values into that column any more.
I know, If I alter the column to NOT NULL will throw me an error, since it does a batch update.
Is there any way to achieve this...
Thanks...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2006
ok here is a WIERD issue.
I've NEVER EVER had this issue, I have always done this and it works great both locally and remotely.
I have a table, which is a "customers" table.
I have a stored procedure which takes in parameters (name, address, password etc...) and returns me back, via a parameter declared as output - the customer ID.
I've always done this, and works great.
Now, this works fine locally.
IF I try to run this/do the exact same execution of commands (create a customer) remotely (where the database is stored, so copying everything from local to "over there") it does not work.
I get a DBNULL value back from the parameter, declared as an int output.
IF I copy and paste this Stored procedure Query/command into Query Analyzer and execute it (on the remote connection) and run it, giving it the exact same values as I do, it works perfect and returns me the correct value.
I've even dropped and recreated the stored procedure but makes no difference.
Any ideas why?
here is the proc....
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[DoCreateNewCustomer] (
@theFirstName nvarchar(25),
@theLastName nvarchar(25),
@theAddress nvarchar(50),
@theCity nvarchar(15),
@thePostCode nvarchar(9),
@thePhoneNumber nvarchar(21),
@theMobilePhoneNumber nvarchar(21),
@theIPAddress nvarchar(25),
@thePassword nvarchar(50),
@theEmailAddress nvarchar(30),
@result int output
)
AS
SET @result = (SELECT [ID] FROM Customers WHERE emailAddress = @theEmailAddress)
IF @result IS NOT NULL
SET @result = -1
ELSE
BEGIN
SET @result = @@IDENTITY
INSERT INTO Customers (
Firstname,
Lastname,
Address,
City,
Postcode,
PhoneNumber,
MobileNumber,
IPAddress,
[Password],
EmailAddress
)
VALUES (
@theFirstName,
@theLastName,
@theAddress,
@theCity,
@thePostCode,
@thePhoneNumber,
@theMobilePhoneNumber,
@theIPAddress,
@thePassword,
@theEmailAddress
)
END
GO
Any ideas why it does not work when calling the stored proc from either a web app, or through QA remotely but works fine when I run that command in QA or locally?
Again, if I do:
EXEC DoCreateNewCustomer { params } - the output result it gives me is DBNULL (if on remote connection)
If I do this locally, perfect
If I copy and paste pretty much the SP into QA and execute it on the remote connection, works great, and also locally.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Feb 29, 2008
Hi all,
One of my columns is the table has some Null values, and I Would like to stop having NULL values into that column any more.
I know, If I alter the column to NOT NULL will throw me an error, since it does a batch update.
Is there any way to achieve this...
Thanks...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2008
I have a pivot transform that pivots a batch type. After the pivot, each batch type has its own row with null values for the other batch types that were pivoted. I want to group two fields and max() the remaining batch types so that the multiple rows are displayed on one row. I tried using the aggregate transform, but since the batch type field is a string, the max() function fails in the package. Is there another transform or can I use the aggragate transform another way so that the max() will work on a string?
-- Ryan
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2008
Hello everyone,I have a table that stores data of a Person. For personal data, there are 2 different fields, for example... a personal address and a professional address, a peronal email and a professional email, a personal phone num and a professional phone num, etc...My question is, i would like to know if it's possible to make it for at least one of these fields to be NOT NULL, but not necessarily both.I'll have 2 fields: emailPersonalemailProfessional Can i make it so that, when inserting or updating data, sql checks to see if AT LEAST ONE of the emails is filled in (both can also be filled in)... I dont care which one is filled in, as long as ONE is filled in... Thanks in advance,SuperJB
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2003
Hello all
I am trying to run a sql statement, (without having to run stored procedures), that will lookup a value stored in a Record.field., otherwise ignore the value if it is blank. I have a field tied to a Microsoft Access form - ItemLocation. If the user selects a unique ItemLocation the report will attempt to locate all values within that ItemLocation. If the user decides to leave the field blank, I would like for it to return all values for every ItemLocation. If anyone can help, I would really appreciate it. I will attach code. My problem is the last line of this SQL statement. If F.ITemLocation is null, I get no data. I would like for it to return everything. Thank you.
Code:
SELECT DISTINCT
B.BarCodeID,
A.ItemDescription,
A.ItemCategory,
A.TypeOfItem,
A.SerialNumber,
B.ItemLocation,
B.LocationID,
B.LastUpdate,
B.TrackItID,
B.UserID
FROM
tblMISFixedAssetTable A,
tblMISFixedAssetTable2 B
WHERE A.BarCodeID = B.BarCodeID
AND A.DisposalDate is null
AND B.LastUpdate = (Select Max(C.LastUpdate)
from tblMISFixedAssetTable2 C
Where B.BarCodeID = C.BarCodeID)
AND B.BarCodeID in (Select D.BarCodeID
from tblMISFixedAssetTable3 D
Where D.FiscalYear = (Select E.FiscalYear
from tblReportFY E))
AND B.ItemLocation = (Select F.ItemLocation
from tblReportFY F)
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 6, 1999
Is there any way in SQL Server 6.5 to change a column that was originally set up as nullable to not accept nulls? None of the values in this column contain null values. I need to add a primary key constraint on the column for replication purposes and SQL won't let me because the column is nullable.
Thanks!
Paul
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 10, 1999
Hi,
In my SQL Server database one of the tables column has to be changed from NOT NULL to NULL. The table has got records.
Thanks in advance,
Srini
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2004
Hi there,Is there any setting in SQL that can disable this silly logic.For example, in a number cleaning query I want to combine the Code and the Number The problem is that I either the code or the number is null, I lose the number: update tblset Teleh = CodeH + TeleH I know that I can split this and check if one is null, both null, both non-null but i am sure there must be an easier way such as Accesses & operator The way that I am using now does this, but i'm not sure if this is the best approach update tblset Teleh = isnull(Codeh,'') + isnull(Teleh,'') The problem with this is that the result is not stored as null, but as '' length 0
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2004
I'd like to know what are the differences between <> NULL and is not null in SQL Server
I have a sp which uses <>NULL syntax to check for not NULL columns but to insert them in a table, but I've noticed that in some cases (some bds and/or servers) it runs ok while in others it fails resulting in a table with no cols inserted (all setted to NULL). I've changed the sp to 'is not null' syntax and now it works properly. What is the reason for this behaviour?
View 1 Replies
View Related
