Improving Count(*) Performance
Feb 24, 2008
Hi guys,
I'm facing a performance issue with select count(*) table_name when performing pagination to my results. My actualy query joins 4 tables with proper PK and FK contrainsts and indices applied.
select top 100 * from table1
left outer join table2 on tid=rid
left outer join table3 on tid=aid
inner join shipment on sid=sid
where datetime>=convert(datetime,'20070810 00:00:00') and datetime<=convert(datetime,'20070920 23:59:59')
The query above takes 200 ms to 600 ms to execute.
select count(*) from table1
left outer join table2 on tid=rid
left outer join table3 on tid=aid
inner join shipment on sid=sid
where datetime>=convert(datetime,'20070810 00:00:00') and datetime<=convert(datetime,'20070920 23:59:59')
The query above takes 2000ms to 4000 ms to run.
The total records that fulfill the where clause is approximately 5000 to 6000 records. I checked the execution plan but found that the server is actually utilizing the indices with operations like index scan and index seek.
Are there any other things that i can do to improve the counting of total records?
Thanks.
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 19, 2007
Hi,I used SQL Server 2005 on my development machine, and whilst thismachine isn't as powerful as the live server, it does at times seem alittle slower than I would expect. So I've been wondering if there isany way for me to tune the machine so that SQL Server is better able tomake use of the resources? I am using WS2003.Short of tweaking with the actual database, which is still underdevelopment, does anyone have any tips to increase peformance?Thanks,--Dylan Parryhttp://electricfreedom.org | http://webpageworkshop.co.ukProgramming, n: A pastime similar to banging one's headagainst a wall, but with fewer opportunities for reward.
View 16 Replies
View Related
Sep 23, 2007
I've written a small application that uses a Microsoft Sql Server 2000 Database and Here lately i've been experiencing alot of performance problems with timeouts and data just taking too long to retreive. I was wondering what could i do to help with this.
Details:
My Program i wrote simply takes windows eventlogs and uploads them into a central database in general , i have also build a small asp.net page, where users could write out queries or save them for later use. The program is hitting our servers and it grabs them remotely, inserts into sql one by one, and clears out the logs when finished, it runs one a day, and generates about 12,000 events daily. (mostly login's and logoffs). once it starts it'll take about 2 and a half hours to finish going through everything.
Database Design...
Single Table, about 3.5 million rows now, takes up about 3 gigs of harddrive space.
Column Definitions
Name, Data Type
EventEntryID INT PrimaryKey(Clustered) (Auto-Increment Identity)
Log varchar(300)
Type varchar(300)
Date smalldatetime
Source varchar(300)
Category varchar(300)
Message varchar(8000)
EventID varchar(300)
UserName varchar(300)
Computer varchar(300)I know the database design can probally use some work, but it's hard to do so now b/c of the massive amoutns of data without killing the transaction log.
Computer Specs:
OS: Window Server 2003
Processor: Intel 700 MHz
RAM: 1 GB
I know it's a small server, but this is pretty much the largest thing this server deals with
I've tried to monitor sql with perfmon and sql performance counters and I just don't see much of anything going wrong with it there, so i'm thinking the the hardware isn't an issue, but then again, i'm not very familar with sql.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2006
hello everyone,
does anyone know some tipps or articles that descripe how the sqlserver 2000 can be improved? i have an application which displays newspapers. the text of the newspapers is saved in db. performance is ok but i have performance-problems when i do a fulltext-search.
1) hardware: p4 xeon double core, 2.4 Ghz, 2 GB Ram
2) number of articles in database: ~ 255.000 Records (betwenn 10 - 400 words each)
3) the database is indexed (i am searching with "CONTAINS" and not with the "LIKE"-keyword)
4) in my query i am searching in 3 columns (title,leadtext,content)
5) results (searching for one word, stopping after 150 Results):the time to get a result from database lies between 5 to 10 Seconds (Average: 6.77 sec)!
this is the time only for getting the dataset from the sqlserver. the time of manipulating the dataset and binding it to my repeater needs about 15 milliseconds. using a sqldatareader didn't improve the performance. i got the same results.
in future the number of records will be three to five times higher than now. i am afraid that then the user has to wait half a minute to get a result of 150 search hits.
my questions:
Are you having similiar results in your applications? Are this times acceptable?
The SqlServer 2000 (professional) is installed in its default way with the default settings. Are they possiblities to modify this settings for improving performance? Where can i find info about that?
greetings and thx
Klaus
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2006
I have a varchar(max) field that is on its way to a Term Lookup task, so it requires conversion to DT_NTEXT before it gets there. The conversion is taking a really, really, really long time. In my current example I have about 400 rows. Granted the length of the varchar(max) if I 'select max(len(myColumn))' is approximately 14,000,000 so I understand that I'm moving a lot of data. But I'm on a x64 machine with 4 dual core processors and watching Task Manager I can see that I'm only using 1 core out of 8. Anything I'm missing that can speed this up?
Thanks,
Frank
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 5, 2007
I have a number of complex search stored procedures that use the following syntax to try to simplify the code.
WHERE @SearchParam IS NULL OR SearchCol = @SearchParam
unfortunately it appears that this is really inefficient as far as the database is concerned.
If I run the following query on the AdventureWorks database (SQL Server 2005 with SP2 and fixes up to v3054)
Code Block
SET STATISTICS IO ON
Declare @CustomerID int
SET @CustomerID = 1
SELECT SalesOrderID
FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader
WHERE @CustomerID IS NULL OR CustomerID = @CustomerID
SELECT SalesOrderID
FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader
WHERE CustomerID = @CustomerID
Is see that the first select results in 45 logical reads, whereas the second results in only 2 logical reads.
Does anyone have any idea how I can get the benefit of a search procedure that does not have loads of IF blocks, or dynamic SQL without this major performance issue?
Cheers,
Justin
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2007
We have a table that is 800GB. We are planning to re-build the clustered index on this table to a different filegroup. The new filegroup and files associated with it will sit on a SAN which will have a 1.5TB allocation. Does anyone have any suggestions in regards to how many files to have associated with the filegroup to provide optimal performance? Apparently we could have 3 LUNS (500gb each), so would 1 file on each LUN provide additional performance as opposed to one file on 1 LUN?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
I need to update the columns to blanks if it has Nulls; Most of thetime we do not have Nulls and to check that in a 3.2 million table ittakes 2 minutes and 45 seconds. (To do select count(*) from <table>where <columnname> is Null) .I just cut and pasted a part from my stored procedure:EXEC ('IF (SELECT COUNT (*) FROM ' + @tblname + ' WHERE '+@columnname + ' is Null ) >0BEGINPRINT ''' + @columnName + ' has Null ''' +' UPDATE ' + @tblname +' SET ' + @columnName + ' = ''''WHERE ' + @columnName + ' is NullPRINT ''Updated ''END'Please let me know if there is a better way to do instead of doingcount (*).Thanks in advance!
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 21, 2008
Hello,
I have a simple count(*) query on tableA that takes 1:30 min.
The table has a pk defined and there are only 250k records.
I have already tried count(1) which takes same amount of time.
What influences count(*) performance?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2007
Hi all,
I have a simple cube with only one measure : "Amount", I have three dimensions Supplier, Category and Company.
I would like to display a matrix with Categories as rows, company as columns, the amount and the number of distinct suppliers who appaers for each category/company.
I tried to create a calculated measure like this:
Count(Crossjoin({[D Supplier].[Supplier Code].members}, {[Measures].[Amount]}), EXCLUDEEMPTY)
The result is OK, but when I add this calculated Measure to my query the execution time jumps from a few seconds (<10) to a few minutes. Am I missing something ?
Anyone have an idea to do this in a better way ?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2008
Hello,
I have the following queries that run on a view called EntrySummary:
1)
exec sp_executesql N'SELECT COUNT (1) FROM [dbo].[EntrySummary] WHERE [EntrySummary].[SubmissionStatusID] = @SubmissionStatusID0 AND [EntrySummary].[CreatedBy] = @CreatedBy1',N'@SubmissionStatusID0 int,@CreatedBy1 nvarchar(20)',@SubmissionStatusID0=4,@CreatedBy1=N'domainaperson'
2)
exec sp_executesql N'SELECT COUNT (1) FROM [dbo].[EntrySummary] WHERE [EntrySummary].[CreatedBy] = @CreatedBy1 AND [EntrySummary].[SubmissionStatusID] = @SubmissionStatusID0',N'@SubmissionStatusID0 int,@CreatedBy1 nvarchar(20)',@SubmissionStatusID0=4,@CreatedBy1=N'domainaperson'
(The only difference between the two queries being the order of the where clauses)
Both return the correct answer (4144), but Query 2 takes 10-15 seconds whereas Query 1 takes < second.
If the same query is resubmitted several times, this doesn't affect the times.
(The vast majority of the records have a status of 4, but only about 3% will be created by the person).
Replacing Count(1) with count(*) makes both queries return quickly.
Is sp_executesql creating poor execution plans ? Can anyone explain this behaviour?
Regards,
AndyM
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2005
Here's a sample SELECT statement:
SELECT T1.F3
FROM T1 INNER JOIN T2 ON T1.F4 = T2.F4
WHERE
(T1.F1 > @iNum AND T2.F1 > @iNum)
OR
( @iNum2 * (T1.F1 - T2.F1)/(T1.F2 - T2.F2) ) + (T1.F1 - ((T1.F1 - T2.F1)/(T1.F2 - T2.F2) * T1.F2) ) > @INum
As you can see, the second part of the WHERE (after the OR) is much more complicated than the part before the OR. My query would run a lot faster if it tried the first part of the OR and didn't bother with the second part if the first part was satisfied. Is there any way to do this?
Thanks!
Tyler
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2007
Hi all,
My colleague and I are having some difficulties regarding the speed of a LIKE query on our intranet system. Please see the quote below as posted on another SQL forum (To which no one has responded yet ).
Quote: Howdy,
I've taken control of an SQL Database with an ASP front end. The CPU usage of the SQL Server process periodically jumps up to between 75-99%. I've managed to identify the ASP page that is causing it and it's a search page.
It's basically doing something like this:
SELECT JobNumber, CustomerName, CustomerAddress, CustomerPostCode
FROM Customers
WHERE CustomerName LIKE '%query%'
OR CustomerAddress LIKE '%query%'
OR CustomerPostCode LIKE '%query%'
Where query is the value the user has searched on.
The CustomerName and CustomerPostCode fields are varchar fields, but the CustomerAddress field is a text field.
I know if I replace the CustomerAddress text field with a series of varchar fields then I could make them non-clustered indexes, but would this help speed things up with a LIKE query?
There's a lot of work required on the ASP side if I'm going to split the field out, so I only want to do it if I'm gonna get a significant benefit from doing it.
Failing this, is there a better way of performing a search like this?
Any help is much appreciated,
Thanks!
View 9 Replies
View Related
Nov 4, 2006
All:
I am presently tasked with improving the performance of a chatty application. What I mean by a chatty application is that the application makes multiple calls to the database server for each user request. In many cases it appears that many of the windows are making multiple calls to the database for the population of dialog boxes. In a couple of cases there are more than 10 dialog boxes that are populated similar to this.
To me this is kind of an "old issue", but my response is (1) cache the dialog information as much as possible and (2) make one call to the database to return all of this data for the dialog boxes if it is not cached. For update calls again make a single call to the database rather than making a call for each individual row of a table that is updated.
I admit that some of this will complicate the code of the application; however, my perspective is that I am supposed to look at this from the database perspective and not from the perspective of "programmer convenience." There will be times in which something that would otherwise get to hairy for a programmer will dictate an additional trip to the server, but this should not normally be the case.
What else do I need to consider?
Dave
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 26, 2007
Does any one know of any good components I can buy in to sit on top of my SQL Server to provide the kind of search functionality that google has - 'Did you mean...,' nearset match etc. I have set up SQL Server Full Text but to build all the extra functionality will take some time and I think it will be more cost effective to buy a component in. If any one has used any could you let me know of you experinces please. CheersScott
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 4, 2008
Is there a configuration or a trick to improve the speed of the access to inserted and deleted tables whithin a trigger? Whenever a trigger is called, the access to inserted or deleted constitute approximatly 95% of the execution time.
Is there a way to have access to inserted and to deleted improved other than copying the data to another table?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 6, 2006
With the function below, I receive this error:Error:Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates that a COMMIT or ROLLBACK TRANSACTION statement is missing. Previous count = 1, current count = 0.Function:Public Shared Function DeleteMesssages(ByVal UserID As String, ByVal MessageIDs As List(Of String)) As Boolean Dim bSuccess As Boolean Dim MyConnection As SqlConnection = GetConnection() Dim cmd As New SqlCommand("", MyConnection) Dim i As Integer Dim fBeginTransCalled As Boolean = False
'messagetype 1 =internal messages Try ' ' Start transaction ' MyConnection.Open() cmd.CommandText = "BEGIN TRANSACTION" cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() fBeginTransCalled = True Dim obj As Object For i = 0 To MessageIDs.Count - 1 bSuccess = False 'delete userid-message reference cmd.CommandText = "DELETE FROM tblUsersAndMessages WHERE MessageID=@MessageID AND UserID=@UserID" cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@UserID", UserID)) cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@MessageID", MessageIDs(i).ToString)) cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() 'then delete the message itself if no other user has a reference cmd.CommandText = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tblUsersAndMessages WHERE MessageID=@MessageID1" cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@MessageID1", MessageIDs(i).ToString)) obj = cmd.ExecuteScalar If ((Not (obj) Is Nothing) _ AndAlso ((TypeOf (obj) Is Integer) _ AndAlso (CType(obj, Integer) > 0))) Then 'more references exist so do not delete message Else 'this is the only reference to the message so delete it permanently cmd.CommandText = "DELETE FROM tblMessages WHERE MessageID=@MessageID2" cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@MessageID2", MessageIDs(i).ToString)) cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() End If Next i
' ' End transaction ' cmd.CommandText = "COMMIT TRANSACTION" cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() bSuccess = True fBeginTransCalled = False Catch ex As Exception 'LOG ERROR GlobalFunctions.ReportError("MessageDAL:DeleteMessages", ex.Message) Finally If fBeginTransCalled Then Try cmd = New SqlCommand("ROLLBACK TRANSACTION", MyConnection) cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() Catch e As System.Exception End Try End If MyConnection.Close() End Try Return bSuccess End Function
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 25, 2015
below data,
Countery
parentid
CustomerSkId
sales
A
29097
29097
10
A
29465
29465
30
A
30492
30492
40
[code]....
Â
Output
Countery
parentCount
A
8
B
3
c
3
in my count function,my code look like,
 set buyerset as exists(dimcustomer.leval02.allmembers,custoertypeisRetailers,"Sales")
set saleset(buyerset)
set custdimensionfilter as {custdimensionmemb1,custdimensionmemb2,custdimensionmemb3,custdimensionmemb4}
set finalset as exists(salest,custdimensionfilter,"Sales")
Set ProdIP as dimproduct.dimproduct.prod1
set Othersset as (cyears,ProdIP)
(exists(([FINALSET],Othersset,dimension2.dimension2.item3),[DimCustomerBuyer].[ParentPostalCode].currentmember, "factsales")).count
it will take 12 to 15 min to execute.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 3, 2013
I am trying to get count on a varchar field, but it is not giving me distinct count. How can I do that? This is what I have....
Select Distinct
sum(isnull(cast([Total Count] as float),0))
from T_Status_Report
where Type = 'LastMonth' and OrderVal = '1'
View 9 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2004
1. Use mssql server agent service to take the schedule
2. Use a .NET windows service with timers to call SqlClientConnection
above, which way would be faster and get a better performance?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 23, 2006
Hello Everyone,I have a very complex performance issue with our production database.Here's the scenario. We have a production webserver server and adevelopment web server. Both are running SQL Server 2000.I encounted various performance issues with the production server with aparticular query. It would take approximately 22 seconds to return 100rows, thats about 0.22 seconds per row. Note: I ran the query in singleuser mode. So I tested the query on the Development server by taking abackup (.dmp) of the database and moving it onto the dev server. I ranthe same query and found that it ran in less than a second.I took a look at the query execution plan and I found that they we'rethe exact same in both cases.Then I took a look at the various index's, and again I found nodifferences in the table indices.If both databases are identical, I'm assumeing that the issue is relatedto some external hardware issue like: disk space, memory etc. Or couldit be OS software related issues, like service packs, SQL Serverconfiguations etc.Here's what I've done to rule out some obvious hardware issues on theprod server:1. Moved all extraneous files to a secondary harddrive to free up spaceon the primary harddrive. There is 55gb's of free space on the disk.2. Applied SQL Server SP4 service packs3. Defragmented the primary harddrive4. Applied all Windows Server 2003 updatesHere is the prod servers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.67GHZTotal Physical Memory 2GB, Available Physical Memory 815MBWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1Here is the dev serers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.80GHz2GB DDR2-SDRAMWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1I'm not sure what else to do, the query performance is an order ofmagnitude difference and I can't explain it. To me its is a hardware oroperating system related issue.Any Ideas would help me greatly!Thanks,Brian T*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 26, 2007
I use SQL 2000
I have a Column named Bool , the value in this Column is 0�0�1�1�1
I no I can use Count() to count this column ,the result would be "5"
but what I need is "2" and "3" and then I will show "2" and "3" in my DataGrid
as the True is 2 and False is 3
the Query will have some limited by a Where Query.. but first i need to know .. how to have 2 result count
could it be done by Count()? please help.
thank you very much
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
SQL 2000I have a table with 5,100,000 rows.The table has three indices.The PK is a clustered index and has 5,000,000 rows - no otherconstraints.The second index has a unique constraint and has 4,950,000 rows.The third index has no constraints and has 4,950,000 rows.Why the row count difference ?Thanks,Me.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2007
The following query returns a value of 0 for the unit percent when I do a count/subquery count. Is there a way to get the percent count using a subquery? Another section of the query using the sum() works.
Here is a test code snippet:
--Test Count/Count subquery
declare @Date datetime
set @date = '8/15/2007'
select
-- count returns unit data
Count(substring(m.PTNumber,3,3)) as PTCnt,
-- count returns total for all units
(select Count(substring(m1.PTNumber,3,3))
from tblVGD1_Master m1
left join tblVGD1_ClassIII v1 on m1.SlotNum_ID = v1.SlotNum_ID
Where left(m1.PTNumber,2) = 'PT' and m1.Denom_ID <> 9
and v1.Act = 1 and m1.Active = 1 and v1.MnyPlyd <> 0
and not (v1.MnyPlyd = v1.MnyWon and v1.ActWin = 0)
and v1.[Date] between DateAdd(dd,-90,@Date) and @Date) as TotalCnt,
-- attempting to calculate the percent by PTCnt/TotalCnt returns 0
(Count(substring(m.PTNumber,3,3)) /
(select Count(substring(m1.PTNumber,3,3))
from tblVGD1_Master m1
left join tblVGD1_ClassIII v1 on m1.SlotNum_ID = v1.SlotNum_ID
Where left(m1.PTNumber,2) = 'PT' and m1.Denom_ID <> 9
and v1.Act = 1 and m1.Active = 1 and v1.MnyPlyd <> 0
and not (v1.MnyPlyd = v1.MnyWon and v1.ActWin = 0)
and v1.[Date] between DateAdd(dd,-90,@Date) and @Date)) as AUPct
-- main select
from tblVGD1_Master m
left join tblVGD1_ClassIII v on m.SlotNum_ID = v.SlotNum_ID
Where left(m.PTNumber,2) = 'PT' and m.Denom_ID <> 9
and v.Act = 1 and m.Active = 1 and v.MnyPlyd <> 0
and not (v.MnyPlyd = v.MnyWon and v.ActWin = 0)
and v.[Date] between DateAdd(dd,-90,@Date) and @Date
group by substring(m.PTNumber, 3,3)
order by AUPct Desc
Thanks. Dan
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2006
Hello Everyone,I have a very complex performance issue with our production database.Here's the scenario. We have a production webserver server and adevelopment web server. Both are running SQL Server 2000.I encounted various performance issues with the production server witha particular query. It would take approximately 22 seconds to return100 rows, thats about 0.22 seconds per row. Note: I ran the query insingle user mode. So I tested the query on the Development server bytaking a backup (.dmp) of the database and moving it onto the devserver. I ran the same query and found that it ran in less than asecond.I took a look at the query execution plan and I found that they we'rethe exact same in both cases.Then I took a look at the various index's, and again I found nodifferences in the table indices.If both databases are identical, I'm assumeing that the issue isrelated to some external hardware issue like: disk space, memory etc.Or could it be OS software related issues, like service packs, SQLServer configuations etc.Here's what I've done to rule out some obvious hardware issues on theprod server:1. Moved all extraneous files to a secondary harddrive to free up spaceon the primary harddrive. There is 55gb's of free space on the disk.2. Applied SQL Server SP4 service packs3. Defragmented the primary harddrive4. Applied all Windows Server 2003 updatesHere is the prod servers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.67GHZTotal Physical Memory 2GB, Available Physical Memory 815MBWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1Here is the dev serers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.80GHz2GB DDR2-SDRAMWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1I'm not sure what else to do, the query performance is an order ofmagnitude difference and I can't explain it. To me its is a hardware oroperating systemrelated issue.Any Ideas would help me greatly!Thanks,Brian T
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 25, 2007
Hi all
i using lookup error output to insert rows into table
Rows count rows has been inserted on the table 59,123,019 mill
table rows count 6,878,110 mill ............................
any ideas
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 28, 2007
Is there a difference in performance when using count(*) or count(columnname)?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2004
I would like to AUTOMATICALLY count the event for the month BEFORE today
and
count the events remaining in the month (including those for today).
I can count the events remaining in the month manually with this query (today being March 20):
SELECT Count(EventID) AS [Left for Month],
FROM RECalendar
WHERE
(EventTimeBegin >= DATEADD(DAY, 1, (CONVERT(char(10), GETDATE(), 101)))
AND EventTimeBegin < DATEADD(DAY, 12, (CONVERT(char(10), GETDATE(), 101))))
Could anyone provide me with the correct syntax to count the events for the current month before today
and
to count the events remaining in the month, including today.
Thank you for your assistance in advance.
Joel
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2007
I have an sql command for when you add a new name to the database it counts to see how many of the name entered to the textbox exist in the database. If the count is 0 then it will add the name to the table. Else it displays an error message.
This works fine for inserting a new name but on my update page where you may update the name I have the same code which on button click counts to see how many exist. But if you leave the textbox the same value and click the button the count obviously results in 1 and brings up an error message.
Is there a way I can do a count but not including the name that is currently the value of the textbox?protected void UpdateSharedArea(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection(docShare_ConString);
//Count the amount of area names that are the same as typed by user
SqlCommand existCheck = new SqlCommand("SELECT COUNT(doc_area_name) FROM document_area WHERE doc_area_name = @doc_area_name", connection);
SqlParameter areaname = new SqlParameter("@doc_area_name", SqlDbType.VarChar);
areaname.Value = AreaText.Text;
existCheck.Parameters.Add(areaname);
connection.Open();
int count = (int)existCheck.ExecuteScalar();
connection.Close();
//If the area name does not exist within the table
if (count == 0)
{
//Update name Cheers, Mark
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2007
Hi,
This is my table structure ,
Name
John
John
Raj
John
Raj
From the above table i want to count the repeated name and my output should be
Name Count
John 3
Raj 2
since no of jone in my table is 3 and number of Raj is 2 .
how to write the query for this ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 17, 2007
I want to do something like this:
SELECT COUNT (SELECT TOP(10) * FROM MyTable order by Date Desc) FROM MyTable where User = 'Scott'
What I want is to return the number of affected rows where the column 'User' equals 'Scott'....But is should only check in the 10 latest inserted rows.....
Hope you understand what I mean...
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 26, 2007
'<%# Eval("Username") %>'
Hi: Everybody
Today is not my day, I am trying to get a Count(*) from a table (name: Photos), I can get the total number if like this: WHERE (u_username = 'jamest85' )
Now, I want replace the 'jamest85' to a value from a Label, like: Label1.text or '<%# Eval("Username") %>', but always has error, so can you please check for me, how to make it right?
Thanks.
Below is the code:
<asp:Label ID="Label1" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("Username") %>'></asp:Label> <asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource2"runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:myConString %>" SelectCommand="SELECT COUNT(*) AS TotalPhotos FROM Photos WHERE (u_username = 'jamest85' ) GROUP BY u_username"></asp:SqlDataSource>
Thank you very much
jamest85
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 26, 2007
Hello, I need to retrieve all records from a table named Blogs and the number of Posts associated with which Blog giving the name NumberOfPosts to that extra column. I have the following: SELECT b.*, p.COUNT(*) AS NumberOfPosts FROM dbo.Blogs b LEFT JOIN dbo.Posts p ON b.BlogId = p.BlogId I get the error: Incorrect syntax near '*'. Could someone, please, help me out? Thanks, Miguel
View 3 Replies
View Related