Perhaps someone here can give me a hand with this... I have three servers running SQL Server 2000. Two are running Windows Server 2000 SP4 with SQL 2000/SP4 and one Windows Server 2003 with SQL 2000/SP?(probably not 4). I copied the installation DVD to a network drive and successfully performed an in-place upgrade of the Windows Server 2003 machine. However, when I try to upgrade either of the other servers, I get an error indicating that I have a service pack problem.
Reason: Your upgrade is blocked. For more information about upgrade support, see the "Version and Edition Upgrades" and "Hardware and Software Requirements" topics in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
Service pack requirement check:
Your upgrade is blocked because of service pack requirements. To proceed, apply the required service pack and then rerun SQL Server Setup. For more information about upgrade support, see the Version and Edition Upgrades topic in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
My SQL 2005 media was probably released before SP4 was released because the Setup Help indicates that you can directly upgrade from SP3, but makes no mention of SP4. I can't imagine there are any migration problems with it since I can't find any reference to it as a problem on any SQL Server sites... So... I'm left wondering what my problem really is...
I've installed a test instance of SQL 2000 on a test box. I want to try the In-Place upgrade to 2005. I installed 2005 on the test box also, but have been unable to see how to perform the upgrade. I thought running 2005 setup again would prompt me for an instance name .... but it just tells me 2005 is already installed. I must be missing something simple.
Perhaps someone here can give me a hand with this...
I have three servers running SQL Server 2000. Two are running Windows Server 2000 SP4 with SQL 2000/SP4 and one Windows Server 2003 with SQL 2000/SP?(probably not 4). I copied the installation DVD to a network drive and successfully performed an in-place upgrade of the Windows Server 2003 machine. However, when I try to upgrade either of the other servers, I get an error indicating that I have a service pack problem.
Reason: Your upgrade is blocked. For more information about upgrade support, see the "Version and Edition Upgrades" and "Hardware and Software Requirements" topics in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
Service pack requirement check: Your upgrade is blocked because of service pack requirements. To proceed, apply the required service pack and then rerun SQL Server Setup. For more information about upgrade support, see the Version and Edition Upgrades topic in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
Of course, the error doesn't indicate what the service pack problem actually is. My SQL 2005 media was probably released before SP4 was released because the Setup Help indicates that you can directly upgrade from SP3, but makes no mention of SP4. I can't imagine there are any migration problems with it since I can't find any reference to it as a problem on any SQL Server sites... So... I'm left wondering what my problem really is... :confused:
hello, what is the general consensus on installing SQL 2005. I usually run a backup of SQL 2000 dbs and then restore on SQL 2005 and change compatibility to 9.0. Is it the right way to upgrade? I'm only asking because I also did one db in-place to SQL 2005 and thought it went well until I browsed my system dbs. All of them are missing tables that usually appear in SQL 2005 system dbs. Other than that I haven't run into too many problems.
We are running a test upgrade form sql 2000 standard edition 32 bit to sql 2005 developer edition 32bit. Followed through all the steps and specified the account(SA priveleges and currently used by the 2000 version) and is the local admin on the box for the services and the setup seemed to move fine, except for when it got to the point of installing database services - This is the error message that I got:
MSSQLServer could not be started. Verify you have sufficient priveleges to start system services. The was no choice but to hit cancel and then the set up progressed with a final message of 'SEtup failed'.
Here is a portion of the error log: Attempting to recover in-doubt distributed transactions involving Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator (MS DTC). This is an informational message only. No user action is required. Database Mirroring Transport is disabled in the endpoint configuration. Starting up database 'master'. Converting database 'master' from version 589 to the current version 611. Database 'master' running the upgrade step from version 589 to version 590. Error: 946, Severity: 14, State: 1. Cannot open database 'master' version 589. Upgrade the database to the latest version. System Task Aggregate global counters produced an error that was not handled. Major: 9, Minor: 46, Severity:14, State:1 Error: 928, Severity: 20, State: 1. During upgrade, database raised exception 15151, severity 16, state 1, address 01C4C50B. Use the exception number to determine the cause. Error: 15151, Severity: 16, State: 1. Cannot find the endpoint 'TSQL Local Machine', because it does not exist or you do not have permission.
While we choose in-place upgrade for upgrading to SQL Server 2005 from SQL Server 2000, does it actually change the code in Stored Procedures/functions also?
e.g. if I have *= in some old procedure does it change it to INNER JOIN while migrating?
This may be very obvious and when I get to the first test server I will find out, but I only have a new installation of SQL2K5 so far to test with. I have several databases that need to be upgraded to run on 2K5, but the application requires them to run in 8.0 compatibility. Does this mean that an in-place upgrade is not an option?
I apologize if this is a silly question, but I have not yet found the answer specifically.
I have two software products that are accessing the same MSDE Database instance. I recently upgraded the MSDE instance to SQL Express using the in place method. The upgrade runs with success. However, one scenerio is breaking both software products.
1. Product A is not installed
2. An older version of Product B which uses MSDE is intalled.
3. I upgrade the MSDE instance to SQL Express
4. An older version of Product A is installed that uses MSDE.
Note: At this point the install of product A attempts to install an MSDE named instance that is the same as the upgraded instance
5. The install of Product A fails and corrupts the registry keys
6. Now my SQL Express named instance is corrupt and product B can not find the database instance.
Question: Can MSDE and SQL Express run side by side with both having an instance with the same name? I am pretty sure that the answer is going to be No.
If not, how can I prevent this scenerio from occurring. I'm thinking that I will have to do a side by side upgrade creating a new instance with a different name. Then I will have to direct both products to the new named instance. Any ideas or suggestions?
SQL 2000 -> SQL 2005 upgrade on windows server 2003 ... We've done numerous side by side types of upgrades which have the advantages of being able to migrate things at a slower pace with limited downtime. I have a situation where it seems like it would be the least amount of work to do an in place upgrade involving 22 transactional in-house developed databases and associated in-house developed applications. There's no replication, no DTS packages, nothing I can think of that would complicate the upgrade. I was wondering if there's people out there that have done lots of these and haven't had any problems OR if there have been lots of problems. Anyway, any advice would be appreciated.
We recently did the in-place upgrade of SQL 2000 server having the hotfix - 8.00.2191 (Intel IA-64). The server got upgraded successfully without any error and everything seems to work. However, after the upgrade the SQL 2000 hotfix -2191 - didn't get uninstalled. I would like to know :-
1. How we can remove this hotfix? if we remove from add emove programs it doesn't get removed. 2. If we don't remove will it cause any problem?
Will it be possible to do an in-place upgrade from SQL 2000 Server Enterprise SP4 32 bit running on top of 64 bit Windows 2003 Enterprise , clustered, to SQL 2005 Enterprise 64 bit? The 32 bit SQL 2000 to 64 bit SQL 2005 in place upgrade seems questionable to me... Anybody tried anything like this?
Hi, I work with very sensitive data and do not want to do any in-place upgrades. Does anyone know of the risks (or some documentation) involved with an in-place besides the rollback. I would prefer only to do only side by side upgrades.
Installed sql 2005 sp1 on standalone Win 2003 Server box in workgroup. (sql 2000 is default instance, sql 2005 is named instance and sql 2005 Express is floating around somewhere).). Box does not have any prior CTP SP1 versions.
When I reach the "Authentication Mode" dialog during the SP1 install, and click Next, I get
"Your account information could not be verified for one or more instances. Ensure that you can connect to all the selected instances using the account information provided.."
I reset and restarted the sql 2005 database and reporting services using both a local account an the €œsa€? account. In both cases I received the above error message.
What am I missing here?
TIA,
Barking mad!
P.S. Sql9 log is as follows:
04/20/2006 21:18:23.265 ================================================================================ 04/20/2006 21:18:23.265 Hotfix package launched 04/20/2006 21:18:24.890 Product discovery successfully completed during the install process for SQL2005 04/20/2006 21:18:24.890 SP Level check successfully completed during the install process for SQL2005 04/20/2006 21:18:24.890 Product language check successfully completed during the install process for SQL2005 04/20/2006 21:18:24.890 Product version check successfully completed during the install process for SQL2005 04/20/2006 21:18:25.218 Product discovery successfully completed during the install process for SQLEXPRESS 04/20/2006 21:18:25.234 SP Level check successfully completed during the install process for SQLEXPRESS 04/20/2006 21:18:25.234 Product language check successfully completed during the install process for SQLEXPRESS 04/20/2006 21:18:25.234 Product version check successfully completed during the install process for SQLEXPRESS 04/20/2006 21:18:25.234 Command-line instance name check completed during the install process 04/20/2006 21:18:25.234 Baseline build check completed during the install process
Hello!I would like to change the SQL server 2000 from Standard version toDevelopment edition. I have two database running on this server, bothreplicated, with few jobs, etc ... Can you recommend the easiest way to dothis? I heard, it would be as easy as, detaching the databases, deletingcurrent SQL software, installing different one, and attaching the olddatabases back. I doubt that is true, so that's why I'm asking here for anyreal-life instructions.Thanks for your input!Kind regards,Dejan--
Recently when i try to upgrade my current MSDE 2000 (SP3a) to SP4, the system just keep on failing me. Here is the scenario:
1. Download the MSDE2000 SP4 from microsoft
2. Extract the SP4
3. Run the following command in either the command prompt or via a batch file:
echo off echo "Start to Upgrade MSDE SP4 ... " setup.exe /UPGRADESP SQLRUN INSTANCENAME=JSNG SECURITYMODE=SQL UPGRADEUSER=sa UPGRADEPWD=Th3B3st /L*v c:MSDE_Log.log echo "SP4 Upgrade Process completed!"
4. Once the above batch file was runned, the standard SQL configuration screen (gathering information) will be triggered.
5. However after a while the installation will just stopped.
6. When i checked on the log, i have found out that the failure of installation is due to the system has failed to configure the server. PFB for the last few rows of the verbose log:
When I install the sp2 in a cluster,the database engine upgrade failed.I found the error log for the install at C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGHotfixHotFix.log. Here's the part that mattered:
07/05/2007 15:34:18.319 Patching available passive node: NODEA 07/05/2007 15:34:18.319 Patching passive node: NODEA 07/05/2007 15:34:18.335 Waiting for first completed passive node 07/05/2007 15:34:18.491 Task Scheduler: Created remote folder for product instance target \NODEA 07/05/2007 15:35:00.194 Task Scheduler: Transferred payload to remote product instance target \NODEA 07/05/2007 15:35:00.194 Task Scheduler: Transferred payload to remote product instance target \NODEA 07/05/2007 15:35:00.241 Task Scheduler: Created new scheduled task for product instance target \NODEA 07/05/2007 15:35:00.663 Task Scheduler: Saved new scheduled task for product instance target \NODEA 07/05/2007 15:35:00.663 Task Scheduler: Created scheduled task for product instance target \NODEA 07/05/2007 15:35:00.663 Task Scheduler: Started scheduled task for product instance target \NODEA 07/05/2007 15:35:00.663 Task Scheduler: Started scheduled task for product instance target \NODEA 07/05/2007 15:40:06.817 Task Scheduler: Scheduled task for product instance target has completed 07/05/2007 15:40:06.817 Task Scheduler: Waiting for exit code from scheduled task for product instance target \NODEA 07/05/2007 15:40:11.817 Task Scheduler: Received exit code 29512 from scheduled task for product instance target \NODEA 07/05/2007 15:40:11.817 Task Scheduler: Result code for scheduled task for product instance target has been received 07/05/2007 15:40:11.817 Task Scheduler: Removed scheduled task for product instance target \NODEA 07/05/2007 15:40:12.333 Task Scheduler: Removed remote folder for product instance target \NODEA 07/05/2007 15:40:12.333 Remote process completed for product instance target 07/05/2007 15:40:12.333 Exit code for passive node: NODEA = 29512 07/05/2007 15:40:13.333 The following exception occurred: No passive nodes were successfully patched Date: 07/05/2007 15:40:13.333 File: depotsqlvaultstablesetupmainl1setupsqlsesqlsedllinstance.cpp Line: 3422 07/05/2007 15:40:13.676 Watson: Param1 = Unknown 07/05/2007 15:40:13.676 Watson: Param2 = 0x2b01 07/05/2007 15:40:13.676 Watson: Param3 = Unknown 07/05/2007 15:40:13.676 Watson: Param4 = 0x0 07/05/2007 15:40:13.676 Watson: Param5 = instance.cpp@3422 07/05/2007 15:40:13.676 Watson: Param6 = Unknown 07/05/2007 15:40:13.676 Watson: Param7 = SQL9 07/05/2007 15:40:13.676 Watson: Param8 = Hotfix@ 07/05/2007 15:40:13.676 Watson: Param9 = x86 07/05/2007 15:40:13.676 Watson: Param10 = 3042 07/05/2007 15:40:13.676 Installed product: SQL9 07/05/2007 15:40:13.708 Hotfix package completed 07/05/2007 15:40:13.708 Attempting to continue the 32 bit ngen queue
We are getting a failure when upgrading to SP1 for SQL2005. We're running Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition SP1. We're running 4 SQL 2005 instances and 6 SQL 2000 instances on this machine. One of the four 2005 instances did upgrade successfully - don't know how or why.
Looking at other postings, it seems that the 10 lines or so preceding "value 3" in the upgrade log file (under C:WINDOWSHotfixSQL9Logs) are helpful in diagnosing the problem.
MSI (s) (50!8C) [13:38:25:219]: Note: 1: 2262 2: Error 3: -2147287038 MSI (s) (50!8C) [13:38:25:219]: Transforming table Error.
MSI (s) (50!8C) [13:38:25:219]: Transforming table Error.
MSI (s) (50!8C) [13:38:25:219]: Note: 1: 2262 2: Error 3: -2147287038 MSI (s) (50!8C) [13:38:25:219]: Transforming table Error.
MSI (s) (50!8C) [13:38:25:219]: Note: 1: 2262 2: Error 3: -2147287038 MSI (s) (50!8C) [13:38:25:219]: Transforming table Error.
MSI (s) (50!8C) [13:38:25:219]: Note: 1: 2262 2: Error 3: -2147287038 MSI (s) (50!8C) [13:38:25:219]: Product: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 -- Error 29528. The setup has encountered an unexpected error while Installing performance counters. The error is: The specified driver is invalid.
<Failure Type='Fatal' Error='2001'> <EndFunc Name='LaunchFunction' Return='2001' GetLastError='0'> MSI (s) (50:F0) [13:38:25:251]: User policy value 'DisableRollback' is 0 MSI (s) (50:F0) [13:38:25:251]: Machine policy value 'DisableRollback' is 0 Action ended 13:38:25: InstallFinalize. Return value 3.
when i install sql server 2005 in cluster. I have error at Setup process screen --> the selected components are being configured.all the components are failed.I am using domain account with administrator account privilege on both server.OS : windows server 2008 on virtual machine..when i install sql server agent is enable to select during setup..
1. launch the DacIESvcCli.exe at specified time, which in-turn calls the service (southeast asia). 2. the bacpac is created and uploaded to the specified storage
However, after upgrading the Server to V12, it failed to create bacpac file in the storage, there are no errors/no logs/no information.
I'm trying to install SQL 2005 onto a 2012 R2 server. The install is failing at the end when it is trying to start the database service. I have looked in the install logs and I'm getting the following error. I'm running 8 virtual processors on the virtual machine (8 Cores). URL...
Error 29503. The SQL Server service failed to start. For more information, see the SQL Server Books Online topics, "How to: View SQL Server 2005 Setup Log Files" and "Starting SQL Server Manually."The error is (1067) The process terminated unexpectedly.       <Failure Type='Fatal' Error='1067'>    <EndFunc Name='LaunchFunction' Return='1067' GetLastError='203'>    CustomAction Do_sqlScript.3EA9D9BF_D9D2_4023_B2A7_9E2137B2FB1B returned actual error code 1603 (note this may not be 100% accurate if translation happened inside sandbox)    05/18/2015 14:56:41.705 [4924]: Assembly Install: Failing with hr=80070005 at RemoveDirectoryAndChildren, line 396    [code]...
Having an issue updating SQL Server 2012 RTM Standard  to CU3.I'm getting the following error from the Detail log on each try: "Error: Failed to run patch request for instance: MSSQLSERVER (exit code: -2061893565)"I've tried rebooting the server, ensuring the user running the installer is a local admin account, ran the repair wizard on the SQL install...Nothing seems to work.I have two identical servers, the first has gone smoothly, this is bugging me...
Server: Dell R720XD, Dual E5-2643 CPU, 64Gb RAM, Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise x64, SQL Server 2012 RTM CU2 x64 Installed.
Final result: The patch installer has failed to update the following instance: MSSQLSERVER. To determine the reason for failure, review the log files. Â Exit code (Decimal): Â Â Â Â Â -2061893565 Â Start time: Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 2012-09-17 16:25:32 Â End time: Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 2012-09-17 16:28:41 Â Requested action: Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Patch
Instance MSSQLSERVER overall summary: Â Final result: Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â The patch installer has failed to update the shared features. To determine the reason for failure, review the log files. Â Exit code (Decimal): Â Â Â Â Â -2061893565 Â Start time: Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 2012-09-17 16:27:21 Â End time: Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â 2012-09-17 16:28:39 Â Requested action: Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Patch
I can't install the SQL Server 2012 Express version with tools downloaded from [URL]
I'm getting the following error:Â
Error installing SQL Server Database Engine Services Instance Features Could not find the Database Engine startup handle. Error code: 0x851A0019
I'm trying to install a new stand-alone version with a default instance but always getting this error. From the features I'm installing the database engine services (not the replication), all the tools, only the basic management toolds and the SQL Client connectivity SDK.
Further in the installation I'm choosing the Windows authentication and in the list of SQL administrators I've already tried to install as current user but also as System. Both with the same error result.
No logs created, this is all I have: Â Unhandled Exception: System.Security.SecruityException: Request failed. Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â at Microsoft.SqlServer.Chainer.Setup.Setup.DebugBreak() Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â at Microsoft.SqlServer.Chainer.Setup.Setup.Main()
Then the Managed SQL Server Installer box pops up with Managed SQL Server Installer has stopped working.
Not sure if this gets fixed on a restart, but the Backward Compatibility upgrade/piece failed on service pack 1 install for SQL Server 2005. Here is the log output. Anyone experience this?
05/19/2006 08:58:27.648 ================================================================================ 05/19/2006 08:58:27.648 Hotfix package launched 05/19/2006 09:00:04.368 Attempting to install instance: SQL Server Native Client 05/19/2006 09:00:04.383 Attempting to install target: CLARITY 05/19/2006 09:00:04.383 Attempting to install file: sqlncli.msi 05/19/2006 09:00:04.399 Attempting to install file: \<server>s$917f50731dade382ab1bHotFixSqlncliFilessqlncli.msi 05/19/2006 09:00:04.399 Creating MSI install log file at: C:WINDOWSHotfixRedist9LogsRedist9_Hotfix_KB913090_sqlncli.msi.log 05/19/2006 09:00:04.415 Successfully opened registry key: SoftwarePoliciesMicrosoftWindowsInstaller 05/19/2006 09:00:04.415 Failed to read registry key: Debug 05/19/2006 09:00:51.040 MSP returned 3010: A restart is required to complete the install. This message is indicative of a success. This does not include installs where the ForceReboot action is run. This error code is not available on Windows Installer version 1.0. 05/19/2006 09:00:51.118 Successfully opened registry key: SoftwarePoliciesMicrosoftWindowsInstaller 05/19/2006 09:00:51.118 Failed to read registry key: Debug 05/19/2006 09:00:51.118 Pending reboot, successfully installed file: \<server>s$917f50731dade382ab1bHotFixSqlncliFilessqlncli.msi 05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Successfully installed target: <SERVER> 05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Successfully installed instance: SQL Server Native Client 05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Product Status Summary: 05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Product: SQL Server Native Client 05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 SQL Server Native Client (RTM ) - Reboot Required 05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Product: Setup Support Files 05/19/2006 09:00:51.134 Setup Support Files (RTM ) - Not Applied 05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Product: Database Services 05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Database Services (RTM 1399 ENU) - Not Applied 05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Reporting Services (RTM 1399 ENU) - Not Applied 05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Product: Notification Services 05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Notification Services (RTM 1399 ENU) - Not Applied 05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Product: Integration Services 05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Integration Services (RTM 1399 ENU) - Not Applied 05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 05/19/2006 09:00:51.150 Product: Client Components 05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 Client Components (RTM 1399 ENU) - Not Applied 05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 Product: MSXML 6.0 Parser 05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 MSXML 6.0 Parser (RTM ) - Not Applied 05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 Product: SQLXML4 05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 SQLXML4 (RTM ) - Not Applied 05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 Product: Backward Compatibility 05/19/2006 09:00:51.165 Backward Compatibility (RTM ) - Not Applied 05/19/2006 09:00:51.181 05/19/2006 09:00:51.181 Product: Microsoft SQL Server VSS Writer 05/19/2006 09:00:51.181 Microsoft SQL Server VSS Writer (RTM ) - Not Applied 05/19/2006 09:00:51.181
I am planning on upgrading my existing SQL Server 7 to 2000. I plan on starting out just upgrading the SQL first, then upgrading to Win2k Server later on.
I have read some posts here with some of you having issues, etc. Based on your experiences, do you suggest, I do both upgrades together? I think it would be best to do this on a new server, and keeping everything live on the other server until I feel comfortable in moving over the data.
What files besides the database files, should I restore, if any? Are there any significant application performance issues or bugs? Should I wait to apply the first sql patch that was just released last week? What about any code that needs to be rewritten?I will do it as a test first, but any advice would be great.
We are trying to do an upgrade in place and are getting errors that it can't activate model database files. We believe it's because we move all log files to another drive and think Microsoft failed once again to recognize this in their upgrades. They made this mistake in 7.0 SP2 (the SP failed if you moved log files to alternate location) but they fixed it in SP3.
Has anyeone experieinced this problem? Is there a workaround (other than the obvious.)
We are about do an upgrade from 6.5 to 2000. Does anyone know of any material that would be of assistance to me. If you have any pointers that would also be appreciated.
