Incorrect Query Plan With Partitioned View On SQL 2000

Jun 19, 2001

I have a partitioned view containing 4 tables (example follows at end)

The query plan generated on a select correctly accesses just one of the tables

The query plan generated on an update always accesses all four of the tables. I thought that it should only access the partition required to satisfy the update. Can anyone please advise whether:
a) Is this is expected behaviour?
b) Is the partitioned view incorrectly configured in some way?
c) Is there is a known bug in this area

Note that the behaviour is the same with SP1 on SQL2000

I would be very grateful for any advice

Thanks

Stefan Bennett

Example follows

--Create the tables and insert the values
CREATE TABLE Sales_West (
Ordernum INT,
total money,
region char(5) check (region = 'West'),
primary key (Ordernum, region)
)
CREATE TABLE Sales_North (
Ordernum INT,
total money,
region char(5) check (region = 'North'),
primary key (Ordernum,region)
)
CREATE TABLE Sales_East (
Ordernum INT,
total money,
region char(5) check (region = 'East'),
primary key (Ordernum,region)
)
CREATE TABLE Sales_South (
Ordernum INT,
total money,
region char(5) check (region = 'South'),
primary key (Ordernum,region)
)
GO

INSERT Sales_West VALUES (16544, 2465, 'West')
INSERT Sales_West VALUES (32123, 4309, 'West')
INSERT Sales_North VALUES (16544, 3229, 'North')
INSERT Sales_North VALUES (26544, 4000, 'North')
INSERT Sales_East VALUES ( 22222, 43332, 'East')
INSERT Sales_East VALUES ( 77777, 10301, 'East')
INSERT Sales_South VALUES (23456, 4320, 'South')
INSERT Sales_South VALUES (16544, 9999, 'South')
GO

--create the view that combines all sales tables
CREATE VIEW Sales_National
AS
SELECT *
FROM Sales_West
UNION ALL
SELECT *
FROM Sales_North
UNION ALL
SELECT *
FROM Sales_East
UNION ALL
SELECT *
FROM Sales_South
GO

--Look at execution plan for this query
-- This correctly only accesses the South partition
SELECT *
FROM sales_national
WHERE region = 'south'

-- Look at execution plan for update
-- This accesses all partitions - Why?
update sales_national
set total = 100
where ordernum = 23456;

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

SQL Server 2014 :: Query Plan For Partitioned Views Not Running As They Should

Mar 29, 2015

I've been using partitioned views in the past and used the check constraint in the source tables to make sure the only the table with the condition in the where clause on the view was used. In SQL Server 2012 this was working just fine (I had to do some tricks to suppress parameter sniffing, but it was working correct after doing that). Now I've been installing SQL Server 2014 Developer and used exactly the same logic and in the actual query plan it is still using the other tables. I've tried the following things to avoid this:

- OPTION (RECOMPILE)
- Using dynamic SQL to pass the parameter value as a static string to avoid sniffing.

To explain wat I'm doing is this:

1. I have 3 servers with the same source tables, the only difference in the tables is one column with the server name.
2. I've created a CHECK CONSTRAINT on the server name column on each server.
3. On one of the three server (in my case server 3) I've setup linked server connections to Server 1 and 2.
4. On Server 3 I've created a partioned view that is build up like this:

SELECT * FROM [server1].[database].[dbo].[table]
UNION ALL SELECT * FROM [server2].[database].[dbo].[table]
UNION ALL SELECT * FROM [server3].[database].[dbo].[table]5. To query the partioned view I use a query like this:

SELECT *
FROM [database].[dbo].[partioned_view_name]
WHERE [server_name] = 'Server2'

Now when I look at the execution plan on the 2014 environment it is still using all the servers instead of just Server2 like it should be. The strange thing is that SQL 2008 and 2012 are working just fine but 2014 seems not to use the correct plan.

View 9 Replies View Related

Will This Query Be Optimized For A Partitioned View?

Jul 20, 2005

Hello :-)My question is: If I query a partitioned view, but don't know the valuesin the "where x in(<expression>)" clause, i.e.: select * from viewAwhere intVal in(select intVal from tbl1) . Compared to: select * fromviewA where intVal in(5,6).Of course "intVal" is partitioning column.Will this result in an optimized query that searches only the relevanttables?*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!

View 1 Replies View Related

Optimization Of Query On Partitioned View

May 27, 2008

Schema below.

The execution plan shows that this query is correctly optimized to check only the underlying Employee_2008 table.

select * from Employee where ReportingYear = '2008'

This query is not optimized and checks both Employee_2008 and Employee_2007:

declare @ry varchar(4)
set @ry = '2008'
select * from Employee where ReportingYear = @ry

How can I get second query to be optimized correctly?

Schema:

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Employee_2007](
[EmployeeID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Name] [varchar](50) NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Employee_2008](
[EmployeeID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Name] [varchar](50) NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]

CREATE VIEW [dbo].[Employee]
AS
SELECT
'2007' ReportingYear,
EmployeeID,
Name
FROM Employee_2007

UNION ALL

SELECT
'2008' ReportingYear,
EmployeeID,
Name
FROM Employee_2008

View 3 Replies View Related

Incorrect Query Plan

Nov 16, 2007

I was doing a demo last night, something that I've done hundreds of times already. Last night was the first time that it has failed to work. I was trying to show what the sys.dm_db_missing_index_* DMVs can provide.

AdventureWorks database

I'm running the following query:

select city from person.address where city like 'A%'


This is supposed to produce a table scan which in turn will obviously cause SQL Server to detect that an index could be beneficial. However, it does a clustered index scan (yes, I know, basically the same thing) instead and I see absolutely nothing appear in the DMVs. I pulled the data out into a dummy table that did not have a primary key either using the following:
select * into person.tmpaddress from person.address

I then execute the same query and get a table scan which is expected:

select city from person.address where city like 'A%'

However, it does not matter how much I execute that query or any other permutation of explicit query, absolutely nothing at all gets logged into the sys.dm_db_missing_index_* DMVs. I have also tried this same type of thing with several other tables in the AW database and can not find a single query which will cause anything to be logged to these DMVs. It seems that something is broken, but for the life of me, I can't figure out what is wrong. No weird settings, I'm running as sa, etc.


I can run queries like this in other databases and stuff gets immediately logged to the DMVs as expected. Any ideas?

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL 2000 Partitioned View Works Fine, But CURSOR With FOR UPDATE Fails To Declare

Oct 17, 2006

This one has me stumped.

I created an updateable partioned view of a very large table. Now I get an error when I attempt to declare a CURSOR that SELECTs from the view, and a FOR UPDATE argument is in the declaration.

There error generated is:

Server: Msg 16957, Level 16, State 4, Line 3

FOR UPDATE cannot be specified on a READ ONLY cursor



Here is the cursor declaration:



declare some_cursor CURSOR

for

select *

from part_view

FOR UPDATE



Any ideas, guys? Thanks in advance for knocking your head against this one.

PS: Since I tested the updateability of the view there are no issues with primary keys, uniqueness, or indexes missing. Also, unfortunately, the dreaded cursor is requried, so set based alternatives are not an option - it's from within Peoplesoft.

View 2 Replies View Related

Query Against Partitioned View Is Not Optimized Due To CONVERT_IMPLICIT

Nov 2, 2007

We have a situation where queries against a partitioned view ignore a suitable index and perform a table scan (against 200+MB of data), where the same query on the underlying table(s) results in a 4 page index seek. I can€™t find any mention of the situation, so I€™m trying a post here.


We€™re running SQL Server 2005 Enterprise edition sp2 on Windows 2003 Enterprise Edition sp1 on a two node cluster, and it also occurs on a stand-alone development box with Developer edition. We have four tables, named Options#0, Options#1, Options#2, and Options#3. All are almost identical (script generated by SSMS and edited down a bit):


SET ANSI_NULLS OFF
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON

CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Options#0](
[ControlID] [tinyint] NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_Options#0__ControlID] DEFAULT ((0)),
[ModelCode] [char](8) NOT NULL,
[EquipmentID] [int] NOT NULL,
[AdjustmentContextID] [int] NOT NULL,
[EquipmentCode] [char](2) NOT NULL,
[EquipmentTypeCode] [char](1) NOT NULL,
[Description] [varchar](50) NOT NULL,
[DisplayOrder] [smallint] NOT NULL,
[IsStandard] [bit] NOT NULL,
[Priority] [tinyint] NOT NULL,
[Status] [bit] NOT NULL,
[Adjustment] [int] NOT NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_Options#0] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[ModelCode] ASC,
[EquipmentID] ASC,
[AdjustmentContextID] ASC,
[ControlID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]


ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Options#0] WITH CHECK ADD CONSTRAINT [CK_Options#0__ControlID] CHECK (([ControlID]=(0)))


ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Options#0] CHECK CONSTRAINT [CK_Options#0__ControlID]


The only differences between the tables are in the names and in the value defaulted to and CHECKed, which matches the table name (to support the partitioned view, of course).


We receive and load data ever week and every two month, and use an unlikely algorithm to load and manage its availability by running an ATLER on the view (to maintain the access rights defined for the hosting environment). Scripted out via SSMS, the view looks like:


SET ANSI_NULLS ON
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
CREATE VIEW [dbo].[Options] AS select * from Options#1 union all select * from Options#3


The problem is that when we issue a query like


SELECT count(*)
from Options
where ControlID = 1
and ModelCode = '2004NIC9'


The resulting query (as checked via the query plan and SET STATISTICS IO on) will get €œpartitioned€?, running against the proper table, but it will ignore the query, perform a table scan, and churn through 200+MB of data. A Similar query run against the underlying table


SELECT count(*)
from Options#1
where ControlID = 1
and ModelCode = '2004NIC9'


(with or without the ControlID = 1 clause) will perform a Clustered Index Seek and read maybe 4 pages.


Analyzing the execution plan shows that the table query work like you€™d think, but for the query against the view we get a Clustered Index Scan, with predicate:


[DBName].[dbo].[Options#1].[ControlID]=(1) AND CONVERT_IMPLICIT(char(8),[ DBName].[dbo].[Options#1].[ModelCode],0)=€™2004NIC9€™


I get the same results when explicitly listing all columns in the view. The code page on the view and tables is the same (as determined by checking properties via SSMS).


Why is the table data column being implicitly converted to the data type that it already is? Why does this occur when working with the partitioned view but not with the actual table? Can this behavior be controlled or modified without losing the (incredibly useful) data loading management benefits of the partitioned view? I€™m guessing (and hoping) it€™s some subtle quirk or mis-setting, please set me on the right path!


Philip Kelley

View 7 Replies View Related

(SQL 2000) Incorrect Results When Using An Outer Join And A View!

Mar 29, 2008

Hi,
I have a query written in SQL 2000 which returns incorrect result. The query uses left outer join and a view. I read an issue related to this in one of microsoft bug report in this article http://support.microsoft.com/kb/321541.

However, there's a slight difference in the sympton second bullet wherein instead of a expression the query returns a fixed string for one of the column value.

Although the issue mentioned in article seems to be fixed. The later one still seems to be reproducible even with Service Pack 4. However, this issue doesn't appear in SQL Server 2005.

Here's the query to reproduce this error.



Code Snippetcreate table t1 (pk1 int not null,primary key (pk1))
create table t2 (pk1 int not null,label1 varchar(10) not null,primary key (pk1))
go
insert into t1 values (1)
insert into t2 values (2, 'XXXXX')
go
create view V as
select pk1, 'ZZZZ' as label1 from t2
go
select A.pk1 as A_pk1, B.pk1 as B_pk1, B.label1 as B_label1
from t1 as A left outer join V as B on A.pk1 = B.pk1
go

This query is similar to the one mentioned in the article except that in the SELECT clause of CREATE VIEW statement I am passing a fixed value for column "label1".

I just want to confirm that this is an issue and no fix is available for this so far.

Regards,
Naresh Rohra.

View 2 Replies View Related

Query Server To Find All Partitioned Tables, Partition Name, Column Used, Partitioned By

Dec 17, 2007

I want to find a way to get partition info for all the tables in all the databases for a server. Showing database name, table name, schema name, partition by (maybe; year, month, day, number, alpha), column used in partition, current active partition, last partition (for date partitions I want to know if the partition goes untill 2007, so I can add 2008)

all I've come up with so far is:






Code Block

SELECT distinct o.name From sys.partitions p
inner join sys.objects o on (o.object_id = p.object_id)
where o.type_desc = 'USER_TABLE'
and p.partition_number > 1

View 3 Replies View Related

Odd Query Plan For View

Mar 28, 2006

I have a SQL 2000 table containing 2 million rows of Trade data. Hereare some of the columns:[TradeId] INT IDENTITY(1,1) -- PK, non-clustered[LoadDate] DATETIME -- clustered index[TradeDate] DATETIME -- non-clustered index[Symbol] VARCHAR(10)[Account] VARCHAR(10)[Position] INTetc..I have a view which performs a join against a security master table (togather more security data). The purpose of the view is to return allthe rows where [TradeDate] is within the last trading days.The query against the view takes over around 30 minutes. When I viewthe query plan, it is not using the index on the [TradeDate] column butis instead using the clustered index on the [LoadDate] column... Theodd thing is, the [LoadDate] column is not used anywhere in the view!For testing purposes, I decided to do a straight SELECT against thetable (minus the joins) and that one ALSO uses the clustered index scanagainst a column not referenced anywhere in the query.There is a reason why I have not posted my WHERE clause until now. Thereason is that I am doing what I think is a very inefficient clause:WHERE [TradeDate] >= fGetTradeDateFromThreeDaysAgo(GetDate())The function calculates the proper trade date based on the specifieddate (in this case, the current date). It is my understanding that thefunction will be called for all rows. (Which COULD explain theperformance issue...)However, this view has been around for ages and never before caused anysort of problems. The issue actually started the day after I had torecreate the table. (I had to recreate the table because some columnswhere added and others where renamed.)On a side note, if I replace the WHERE clause with a hard-coded date(as in 'WHERE [TradeDate] >= '20060324'), the query performs fine butSTILL uses the clustered index on the [LoadDate] column.

View 4 Replies View Related

View Query Execution Plan

Sep 15, 2007



Hi,

I am developing an application (VB) that should present a query estimated execution plan.

Using the SQL Server Management Studio, I should execute the following commands to see the query's estimated execution plan:


SET SHOWPLAN_XML ON

go

MyQuery
go

SET SHOWPLAN_XML OFF

go

The query is not executed. The result is the query execution plan.


In my application, I call Connection.Execute to execute the 'SET SHOWPLAN_XML ON'. Then, I use a Resultset submit the query. The query is executed and the execution plan is not returned.

Does anyone have any ideas?

Thanks

View 2 Replies View Related

Partinioned View And Query Plan: Oddity?

May 4, 2007

Hello all,

I'm going to implement an inverted index data structure that relies, for performance consideration, on partinioned views.



I've created a set of tables with a column named "PartitionKey" that deserve to partition the view. Then I've created a view using the UNION ALL as prescribed. The partinion works.



Now I'm devising the right SELECT query to benefit from the partition but I'm getting strange query plan.



"word" is the partinioned view and "vocabulary" is a referenced table.



If I write something like this:

select * from

vocabulary v

inner join word w on v.wordid = w.wordid and v.partitionkey = w.partitionkey

where

word = 'foobar'

and w.partitionkey = 1 -- It works correctly even with the condition v.partitionkey = 1



The query plan, correctly, shows that the only table actual accessed is "word1", the one related to the partinionkey value 1. ==> OK



If I write something like this, that appears more intuitively:

select * from

vocabulary v

inner join word w on v.wordid = w.wordid and v.partitionkey = w.partitionkey

where

word = 'foobar'



I get a concatenation operation that involved all the "wordXX" tables. I deduce that the engine is not so "clever" to benefit from the join hint.



So, I rewrite the previous as the following, thinking to feed a better infotmation to the engine:

select * from

vocabulary v

inner join word w on v.wordid = w.wordid and v.partitionkey = w.partitionkey

where

word = 'foobar'

and w.partitionkey = (select partitionkey from vocabulary where word = 'foobar')



That resembles the first example but... it doesn't work: I still get a concatenation operation.



I'm very frustrated and than rewrite again the query in a T-SQL script such this:

declare @partitionkey as int

set @partitionkey = (select partitionkey from vocabulary where word = 'foobar')

select * from

vocabulary v

inner join word w on v.wordid = w.wordid and v.partitionkey = w.partitionkey

where

word = 'foobar'

and w.partitionkey = @partitionkey



And I still get a concatenation operation.



I can understand the behaviour of the second and third example (the query optimizer doesn't have an actual value for the partition key) but the fourth is unbeliavable. Even if I'm feeding a query with a fixed value it cannot benefit of it at all.



Where am I wrong? Is so "silly" the qwery optimizer? How can I force the expected behaviour?



I would say more that the "partitionkey" is generated randomly when a new word is initially inserted into the parent table "vocabulary" so I cannot compute it before to access the "word" table.



I've tested on SQL2005. If anyone is interested I can provide the queryplans generated for all the above examples.

View 7 Replies View Related

Partitioned View

Mar 6, 2006

Hi! This is my first post and I really need help with Partitioned View. I'm using Sql Server 2000 and I created a partitioned view using 6 tables and now a need to create the table '7' and alter the view. But when i'm trying to insert new data i'm receiving the message: :eek:
"Server: Msg 4416, Level 16, State 5, Line 1
UNION ALL view 'tb_sld_cob_pap' is not updatable because the definition
contains a disallowed construct."

My code is:

drop VIEW tb_sld_cob_pap
GO
CREATE TABLE dbo.tb_sld_cob_pap_7 (
cod_operacao int NOT NULL ,
cod_contrato int NOT NULL ,
sequencial_duplicata int NOT NULL ,
data_sld_pap smalldatetime NOT NULL CHECK ([data_sld_pap] >= '20060201'),
liqex_dia_nom_outros float NULL ,
liqex_dia_moe_outros float NULL,
constraint pk_pap7 primary key (cod_operacao,cod_contrato,sequencial_duplicata,da ta_sld_pap)
)
GO
CREATE INDEX IdxSldCobPap7_1 ON dbo.tb_sld_cob_pap_7(cod_titulo, seq_titulo, data_sld_pap)
GO

CREATE INDEX IdxSldCobPap7_2 ON dbo.tb_sld_cob_pap_7(cod_operacao, seq_ctr_sacado, sequencial_duplicata, data_sld_pap)
GO

ALTER TABLE dbo.tb_sld_cob_pap_6
DROP CONSTRAINT CK__tb_sld_co__data___6C190EBB
GO

ALTER TABLE dbo.tb_sld_cob_pap_6 ADD CONSTRAINT
CK__tb_sld_co__data___6C190EBB CHECK (((([data_sld_pap] >= '20051201') and ([data_sld_pap] < '20060201'))))
GO

create VIEW tb_sld_cob_pap
as
select * from tb_sld_cob_pap_1
union all
select * from tb_sld_cob_pap_2
union all
select * from tb_sld_cob_pap_3
union all
select * from tb_sld_cob_pap_4
union all
select * from tb_sld_cob_pap_5
union all
select * from tb_sld_cob_pap_6
union all
select * from tb_sld_cob_pap_7

My table tb_sld_cob_pap_6 does NOT have data with ([data_sld_pap] >= '20060201').
I'm using this script in other database and I don't have this problem.



Thank you...

View 6 Replies View Related

Partitioned View

Jun 18, 2007

USE Northwind
GO

CREATE TABLE myTable99_1 (
Accountchar(3)
, Ledgerchar(4)
, PostDatedatetime
, PRIMARY KEY (Account, Ledger)
, CHECK(PostDate> '1/1/1999' and PostDate < '12/31/1999 23:59:59'))
CREATE TABLE myTable99_2 (
Accountchar(3)
, Ledgerchar(4)
, PostDatedatetime
, PRIMARY KEY (Account, Ledger)
, CHECK(PostDate> '1/1/2000' and PostDate < '12/31/2000 23:59:59'))
CREATE TABLE myTable99_3 (
Accountchar(3)
, Ledgerchar(4)
, PostDatedatetime
, PRIMARY KEY (Account, Ledger)
, CHECK(PostDate> '1/1/2001' and PostDate < '12/31/2001 23:59:59'))

CREATE INDEX myTable99_1_IX ON MyTable99_1
(Account, Ledger)
CREATE INDEX myTable99_2_IX ON MyTable99_2
(Account, Ledger)
CREATE INDEX myTable99_3_IX ON MyTable99_3
(Account, Ledger)
GO

CREATE VIEW myView99
AS
SELECT Account
, Ledger
, PostDate
FROM myTable99_1
UNION ALL
SELECT Account
, Ledger
, PostDate
FROM myTable99_2
UNION ALL
SELECT Account
, Ledger
, PostDate
FROM myTable99_3
GO

SELECT * FROM myView99 WHERE Account = 1 AND Ledger = 1
GO

DROP VIEW myView99
DROP TABLE myTable99_1, myTable99_2, myTable99_3
GO



OK, so I thought I knew this, but I'm looking for parallelism...not only am I no getting it, I'm getting an Index scan....is it becuse I didn't put any data in the table? I thought it would stil show my index seek with parallelism

What up, homey?

View 5 Replies View Related

Updating Across A Partitioned View

Mar 7, 2012

This post concerns updating across a partitioned view, and not unlike others about this subject I am getting this error:

Msg 4436, Level 16, State 12, Line 1
UNION ALL view 'dbII.dbo.MyTable' is not updatable because a partitioning column was not found.

I am aware of the rules for defining a partitioning column, but interpreting them may have beaten me. So perhaps I haven't abided by all the rules. How to spot which one(s) from the view and table definitions? I suspect the CHECK constraint does not allow the ASCII function, but I can't see how to avoid using it given SYSCODE entries in one table are like "[A-Z]%" and in the other are like "[0-9]%".

Otherwise, I suspect it is because one of the tables has, by legacy, a text column and the view is casting it to varchar(MAX). I also suspect it is because there's a second column with a unique index. These aren't mentioned in the rules (are they?).

Here's the view definition:

SELECT SYSCODE, COL2, CAST(COMMENTS AS varchar(MAX)) AS COMMENTS
FROM dbo.MYTABLE
UNION ALL
SELECT SYSCODE, COL2, COMMENTS
FROM OTHERDATABASE.dbo.MYTABLE AS MYTABLE_1

And here are the table definitions:

-- Table in the database where view is defined
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[MYTABLE](
[SYSCODE] [char](12) NOT NULL,

[Code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Partitioned View Problem

Oct 18, 2007

Hi all,

I am designing 3 p:artitioned views for 3 tables. Those tables grow up in 1.5 millions of rows per month (each one), so I decided to partition those tables monthly. The issue is that if I want to create the views with more than 256 months (256 tables) SQL Server says: 'Server: Msg 106, Level 15, State 1, Procedure Jugadas, Line 258Too many table names in the query. The maximum allowable is 256.'

Is there any workaround for this?

Another solution maybe?

PD1: I've tested with less than 256 tables and it works fine, I can update and query the tables (except for a couple of querys where I've got to join 2 or more of the involucred views in which case I got a similar error saying about a 260 table limit).

View 2 Replies View Related

Partitioned View Question

Nov 13, 2007



I have a table that I'm trying to scale out into a partitioned view. It's about 30 million rows. It's a workflow table and I have a taskID in the table. Originally the table was partitioned on this column but performance still wasn't what I wanted it to be, so we figured out how we could partition on a bit flag of IsOpen.

Question #1) Anyone know a best practice for creating apartitioned views on multi-columns?

What I'd like to try to do to lower the complexity of the original partitioned view is to create a view of partitioned views. Is this even possible (This is Q#2, BTW).

View 1 Replies View Related

Updating A Partitioned View In A Cursor

Jan 13, 2004

I have a partitioned view defined by a UNTION ALL of member tables. I can update the member tables through the view without any problem. However, when I declare a cursor on this partitioned view and try to update the view using WHERE CURRENT OF, I get an error saying 'The target object type is not updatable through a cursor'. Does anyone know if it's the case that updating a partitioned view through cursor is not supported in SQL Server 2000?

Thanks

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL 2012 :: Partitioned View Over Two Databases

Sep 8, 2014

I have database with a large table (30 Billion rows) because it is so big I separated the data in quarterly tables and created a partitioned view (with hints for the date column) about 1 billions a quarter. (all in separated filegroups). The tables themselfes are partitioned by date again, so you slice out one day

However the full-backup of grows and grows and the mainpart of it is "old" but needed data.

So I was thinking to put the older data in a separate database (with separated backup) and then point to the table in my view.

While this is technical possible (leaving out the WITH SCHEMABINDING) I wonder what negative consequences it will have.

I already had to lose "with schemabing".

I have to use separate partioning functions - for each database its own - (partition schemas where already separated due to separated filegroups)

What about query optimization, does the optimizer care that there are two databases?

View 6 Replies View Related

Partitioned View With Computed Column

Jan 23, 2008

Using SQL Server 2005. Defined partitioned view with computed column. Computed column was a constant varchar. Ran a SELECT. According to Query Execution Plan, SQL did recognize the computed column as the partitioning column and used it to optimize the query.

However MSDN says a computed column cannot be used as the partitioning column.

Could someone from MS clarify?

View 2 Replies View Related

Partitioned View &&amp; Computed Column..

May 14, 2006

Hello,

please enlighten me regarding an issue with partitioned view... There are 3 tables in my DB of a similar structure:

CREATE TABLE Table1 (value1 varchar(1))
CREATE TABLE Table2 (value1 varchar(1))
CREATE TABLE Table3 (value1 varchar(1))

INSERT INTO Table1 (value1)
SELECT 'a' UNION SELECT 'b' UNION SELECT 'c'

INSERT INTO Table2 (value1)
SELECT 'a' UNION SELECT 'b' UNION SELECT 'c'

INSERT INTO Table3 (value1)
SELECT 'a' UNION SELECT 'b' UNION SELECT 'c'

As sometimes we need to access all data from these tables, a view has been created:

CREATE VIEW AllData AS
SELECT value1, '1' as table_id from Table1
UNION ALL
SELECT value1, '2' as table_id from Table2
UNION ALL
SELECT value1, '3' as table_id from Table3

The problem is that while running a query like

SELECT * from AllData WHERE value1 = 'a' and table_id = '3'

I see a table scan being performed on all 3 tables, not just table3 - i.e optimisation engine doesn't care for my table_id computed column and for that fact that required data is located ONLY in Table3.

Is there any way to force optimiser to consider this column andrrebuild a plan? If not - how can I rebuild a view (I can't modify tables) to achieve that? Maybe create an index for a view?

Thanks in advance. RTFM and search don't seem to clarify this for me...

View 8 Replies View Related

Distributed Partitioned View With RPC (or DTC) Problem

Oct 5, 2007

I am setting up 3 Linked Servers (SERVER_A, SERVER_B and SERVER_C) in an isolated local network. They are all running SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition, all on XP SP2. On each server, I have a distributed partitioned view named WAREHOUSE_ALL that basically is the UNION of all WAREHOUSE tables.

I am having trouble in running write (INSERT, UPDATE or DELETE) queries on the distributed partitioned view. The error returned was (run from SERVER_B)

OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "SERVER_A" returned message "No transaction is active.". Msg 7391, Level 16, State 2, Line 7The operation could not be performed because OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "SERVER_A" was unable to begin a distributed transaction.

However, executing a read (SELECT) query ran smoothly without error.

I have done all the steps required as described in the article at http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=873160 . Note that the only difference between the situation and our situation is the provider (SQLOLEDB and SQLNCLI), which I guess does not important. Unfortunately, the error still comes out.

After reading heaps of other article, I suspected that there is something wrong with MSDTC. As far as I know, all the settings for MSDTC were set accordingly. Then, I ran DTCPing - http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=5e325025-4dcd-4658-a549-1d549ac17644&DisplayLang=en and the error returned was
DTCping log file: C:Documents and SettingsAdministratorDesktoplSERVER_B2496RPC server is ready
Please Start Partner DTCping before pinging
++++++++++++Validating Remote Computer Name++++++++++++
Please refer to following log file for details:
C:Documents and SettingsAdministratorDesktoplSERVER_B2496.log
Invoking RPC method on SERVER_C
Problem:fail to invoke remote RPC method
Error(0x5) at dtcping.cpp @303
-->RPC pinging exception
-->5(Access is denied.)
RPC test failed

And here is the log file:


Platform:Windows XP
IP Configure Information
Host Name . . . . . . . . . : SERVER_B
DNS Servers . . . . . . . . : 129.78.99.2
Node Type . . . . . . . . . :
NetBIOS Scope ID. . . . . . :
IP Routing Enabled. . . . . : no
WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . : no
NetBIOS Resolution Uses DNS : no

Ethernet adapter {4404F3CB-F4B7-4990-912C-E69721C885B1}:

Description . . . . . . . . : 3Com EtherLink XL 10/100 PCI TX NIC (3C905B-TX) #2 - Packet Scheduler Miniport
Physical Address. . . . . . : 00-01-02-85-B8-A9
DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . : no
IP Address. . . . . . . . . : 172.19.102.35
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . : 172.19.102.250
DHCP Server . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.255
Primary WINS Server . . . . : 0.0.0.0
Secondary WINS Server . . . : 0.0.0.0
Lease Obtained. . . . . . . : Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970
Lease Expires . . . . . . . : Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970

++++++++++++lmhosts.sam++++++++++++

++++++++++++hosts ++++++++++++
127.0.0.1 localhost

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
DTCping 1.9 Report for SERVER_B
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
RPC server is ready
++++++++++++Validating Remote Computer Name++++++++++++
10-05, 17:10:54.769-->Start DTC connection test
Name Resolution:
SERVER_C-->172.19.102.36-->SERVER_C
10-05, 17:11:09.781-->Start RPC test (SERVER_B-->SERVER_C)
Problem:fail to invoke remote RPC method
Error(0x5) at dtcping.cpp @303
-->RPC pinging exception
-->5(Access is denied.)
RPC test failed


I guess it could be due to port problem, which I have already opened in the Windows Firewall. There is one article which is confusing me -> Update to automatically open port 135 in Windows Firewall when a TCP or a UDP RPC server registers with the endpoint mapper at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/838191 (This article shows automatic opening of port 135!)

Please help me. Thanks.

View 8 Replies View Related

Bulk Insert In To A Partitioned View?

May 24, 2006

Greetings once again my SQL friends,

I am getting the following error when I attempt to complete my data flow task. The destination is a partitioned view but I get the following error message when I run the package :

Partitioned view 'PRICE_DIM' is not updatable as the target of a bulk operation



How to solve this problem?

View 1 Replies View Related

Insertion Faild In Partitioned View In Sql Server 7.0

Dec 7, 2000

I have a problem while I try to insert data into a partioned view I am
getting the following error.

Server: Msg 4436, Level 16, State 12, Line 9
UNION ALL view 'sales_all' is not updatable because a partitioning column
was not found.

Any thoughts

USE pubs

CREATE TABLE sales_monthly
( sales_month int NOT NULL ,
sales_qty int NOT NULL
)
GO
CREATE TABLE sales_jan
( sales_month int NOT NULL,
sales_qty int NOT NULL
)
GO
CREATE TABLE sales_feb
( sales_month int NOT NULL,
sales_qty int NOT NULL
)
GO

ALTER TABLE sales_feb WITH NOCHECK ADD
CONSTRAINT PK_sales_feb PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
( sales_month
) ,
CONSTRAINT CK_sales_feb CHECK (sales_month = 2)
GO

ALTER TABLE sales_jan WITH NOCHECK ADD
CONSTRAINT PK_sales_jan PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
( sales_month
) ,
CONSTRAINT CK_sales_jan CHECK (sales_month = 1)
GO

View 2 Replies View Related

Unable To Create A Partitioned Indexed View

Jul 25, 2005

Hi,

While creating an indexed view with the command :

create unique clustered index idx_atrid on account_transactions (policy)

there is a check constraint on the policy column of the tables used in this view.

The following error is encountered

Cannot index the view 'test.dbo.account_transactions'. It contains one or more disallowed constructs.

Can anyone help?

View 1 Replies View Related

Triggers On Tables Underlying A Partitioned View

Jul 23, 2005

We have a partitioned view with 4 underlying tables. The view and eachof the underlying tables are in seperate databases on the same server.Inserts and deletes on the view work fine. We then add insert anddelete triggers to each of the underlying tables. The triggers modifya different set of tables in the same database as the view (differentthan the underlying table). The problem is those triggers aren't firedwhen inserting or deleteing via the view. Inserting or deleteing theunderlying table directly causes the the triggers to fire, but not whenthe tables are accessed as a result of using the view.Am I missing something? The triggers are 'for insert' and 'fordelete'. No 'instead of' or 'after' triggers.

View 4 Replies View Related

Partitioned View Broken After Moving Table To New Filegroup

Jul 20, 2005

I am using SQL Server 2000, SP3.I created an updatable partitioned view awhile ago and it has beenrunning smoothly for some time. The partition is on a DATETIME columnand it is partitioned by month. Each month a stored procedure isscheduled that creates the new month's table, and alters the view toinclude it. Again... working like a charm for quite some time.This past weekend I moved some of the first tables onto a new filegroup. I did this through Enterprise Manager, by going into designmode for the table, then going into the properties for the table andchanging the file group there as well as in all of the indexes. Nowthe partitioned view is no longer updatable. It gives the errormessage: "UNION ALL view '<view name>' is not updatable because apartitioning column was not found."I have extracted the DDL for all of the partition tables and comparedthem and they all look the same. I checked and then double-checked theCHECK constraints to make sure that they were all valid and they are.If I remove the tables that I moved to the new file group from theview, then it is once again updatable, but when I put them back in itfails again.Any ideas? If you would like samples of the code then I can send italong, but it's rather large, so I have not included it here.Thanks!Thomas R. Hummel

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2014 :: Indexed View Not Being Used For Partitioned Clustered Column-store Index?

Oct 9, 2015

I am trying to use an indexed view to allow for aggregations to be generated more quickly in my test data warehouse. The Fact Table I am creating the indexed view on is a partitioned clustered columnstore index.

I have created a view with the following code:

ALTER view dbo.FactView
with schemabinding
as
select local_date_key, meter_key, unit_key, read_type_key, sum(isnull(read_value,0)) as [s_read_value], sum(isnull(cost,0)) as [s_cost]
, sum(isnull(easy_target_value,0)) as [s_easy_target_value], sum(isnull(hard_target_value,0)) as [s_hard_target_value]
, sum(isnull(read_value,0)) as [a_read_value], sum(isnull(temperature,0)) as [a_temp], sum(isnull(co2,0)) as [s_co2]
, sum(isnull(easy_target_co2,0)) as [s_easy_target_co2]
, sum(isnull(hard_target_co2,0)) as [s_hard_target_co2], sum(isnull(temp1,0)) as [a_temp1], sum(isnull(temp2,0)) as [a_temp2]
, sum(isnull(volume,0)) as [s_volume], count_big(*) as [freq]
from dbo.FactConsumptionPart
group by local_date_key, read_type_key, meter_key, unit_key

I then created an index on the view as follows:

create unique clustered index IDX_FV on factview (local_date_key, read_type_key, meter_key, unit_key)

I then followed this up by running some large calculations that required use of the aggregation functionality on the main fact table, grouping by the clustered index columns and only returning averages and sums that are available in the view, but it still uses the underlying table to perform the aggregations, rather than the view I have created. Running an equivalent query on the view, then it takes 75% less time to query the indexed view directly, to using the fact table. I think the expected behaviour was that in SQL Server Enterprise or Developer edition (I am using developer edition), then the fact table should have used the indexed view. what I might be missing, for the query not to be using the indexed view?

View 1 Replies View Related

System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Incorrect Syntax Near The Keyword 'Plan'.

May 2, 2005

I'm having Some Problem with my code....Whenever i try to insert from using a Insert button page gives me this error
"System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'Plan'."
Can somebody help me What's the Problem...for your convenience i'm giving my code

Private Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load
        If Not Page.IsPostBack Then
        End If
End Sub
Sub doInsert(Source as Object, E as EventArgs)
Dim myConn As SqlConnection = New SqlConnection(strConn)Dim MySQL as string = "Insert into Activities (ActDate, Activity, Plan, Completed) values (@ActDate, @Activity, @Plan, @Completed);"
        Dim Cmd as New SQLCommand(MySQL, MyConn)
        cmd.Parameters.Add(New SQLParameter("@ActDate", Textbox2.Text))        cmd.Parameters.Add(New SQLParameter("@Activity", Label5.TExt))        cmd.Parameters.Add(New SQLParameter("@Plan", Textbox3.text))        cmd.Parameters.Add(New SQLParameter("@Completed", Textbox4.text))      ' cmd.Parameters.Add(New SQLParameter("@Comments", Text11.text))        MyConn.Open()        cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
        BindData()        MyConn.Close()        label12.text = "Your data has been received!"    ' else    '    label12.text = "Data Already Enter For This Item-Name for This Date"
    ' end ifEnd Sub

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL SERVER 2000 Partitioned Views Bug

May 12, 2008

Thanks in advance in reading this post ! I'm facing a situation in sql server 2000 sp4 with partitioned views.

I have a partition views that joins about 10 tables, in each table there is a check constraint.

For example, if a exec a select count(*) from VIEW where col1 = '20080101' , it goes for the table that has data for '20080101' .

If I exec a select col1,col2,col3,col4 from VIEW where col1='20080101', it goes to all tables and make an index seek.

I want the beaviour of query 1, beause it is just looking on 1 table and not one the 10.



Thanks in advance !

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2008 :: Is Only One Plan Is Kept For One Query In Plan Cache

Mar 14, 2015

Is only one plan is kept for one query in plan cache?

i heard generally hash is created for a query and plan is search with this hash.

View 2 Replies View Related

Database Not In View In New Maintenance Plan SQL 7 (options)

Nov 23, 2006

I recently migrated my database to SQL2005 from SQL7.  It was simply a restore from a backup and was cake.

But now when I go to run a new maintenance plan I do not see my database.

I found that the database options are set to SQL7.  If I change it to SQL 2005 I see the database.

What impact will this have on my data?

View 5 Replies View Related

Integration Services :: Unable To Remove View From Maintenance Plan

Sep 9, 2015

We have a maintenance plan in place for updating the statistics on daily basis. Now, i would like to remove the view from maintenance plan. How can i remove that from Update statistics task?

View 8 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved