Hello there,
I got a problem when I'm trying to Index a table with PrimaryKey
My code so far:
1 'Create my table
2 nonqueryCommand.CommandText = "CREATE TABLE UpdateHistory (id integer IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, version varchar(50) NOT NULL)"
3 Console.WriteLine(nonqueryCommand.CommandText)
4 Session("Tables") = Session("Tables") + "Number of Rows Affected with table UpdateHistory is: " + nonqueryCommand.ExecuteNonQuery().ToString + "<br />"
5
6 'Set column id to Primary Key
7 nonqueryCommand.CommandText = "CREATE INDEX idxid ON UpdateHistory (id) With PRIMARY"
8 Console.WriteLine(nonqueryCommand.CommandText)
9 Session("Tables") = Session("Tables") + "PrimaryKEY - Number of Rows Affected with table UpdateHistory is: " + nonqueryCommand.ExecuteNonQuery().ToString + "<br />"
I do get this error:
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'PRIMARY'. at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj) at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteNonQueryTds(String methodName, Boolean async) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.InternalExecuteNonQuery(DbAsyncResult result, String methodName, Boolean sendToPipe) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() at updates_100_2.Page_Init(Object sender, EventArgs e) in http://server//admin/NewSystem/1.0.0/2.aspx.vb:line 163
Running SQL 6.5, using ActiveX controls(ADO and Datagrid),NT 4.0. All SP's are current.
I lose the ability to get distinct values with a client-side cursor after I set up a primary key. Select distinct works perfect before the primary key creates an index. Any ideas?
I have a table in my SQL 2000 database called utContact, this has a primary called ContactID (int, idenitity), by default this should have a clustered index on it, but when I go to view the indexes on the table it shows the primary key index as non clustered.
How can this be?
SQL server also will not let me change the index to clustered, but I need to as this is causing a lot of table scans in query execution plans.
Any help or advice on this matter would be greatly appreciated.
One of my client having 1 million(nearly) records in a table. I defined the table as below 1) Created table with one col(we can name it as "ID") having IDENTITY 2) Using "alter table", I created CLUSTERED PRIMARY KEY Constraint on Same field (ID) 3) The Primary key having 2 ref with another 2 tables
Now the issue is when we create or define a primary key (With Clustered Option) automatically cluster Index will be created on defined table
As such table having huge data whenever any updation or insertion against that particular table taking huge amount of time, because the cluster Index trying re-paging whole data. Because of re-paging each and every time "Transaction Log also growing in huge" (database is in full recovery mode and client wants in same mode only) Data partitioning not posible because whole data related and current live data
I tried following options with vain
1) To Clear transaction log I suggested to take regular log backup's 2) I tried to drop cluster index and tried to implement non clustered index Drop and re-create index is take taking huge amount of time Even in this process I have to Re_Index remaining Index's also
Pls give me any other solution or suggestion in this regard
'PXQ_2' table - Unable to delete index 'PK_PXQ'. ODBC error: [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]I/O error (bad page ID) detected during read at offset 0x0000000102e000 in file 'D:MSSQL2000MSSQLxxx.mdf'.
I can't drop Primary Key. How to fix this problem?
I want to keep certain archive data in certain tables. One such table is currently about 190 GB in size. It has a primary key with clustered index and three non-clustered indexes. The type of queries fired are strictly selects (daily) and inserts (only monthly).
Question: Is it advisable to have a non-clustered index on the primary key column?.....I am finding that the insert performance is getting hurt due to presence of clustered index on such a large table (190 GB).
I have a question regarding updating statistics for a primary key.
Background: An update statistics with fullscan is sometimes taking 30 minutes - the table is 80 million rows, with only 4 columns. The table is truncated, and then 80 million rows inserted all in one go.
Now why the update stats is taking that long is another question (I have no idea - any thoughts?), but my question is; Since you can't disable the "not automatically recompute statistics" option for a primary key, and you would think it would be imperitive for the stats to be kept up to date for a PK for inserts.... does this mean the stats would be kept up to date? and an update stat with fullscan isn't required?
Table1 with column: Year char(4), Quarter char(1), ID decimal(10,0), Hits int PK_table1 on Year,Quarter,Hits
If i do a "Select Year From table1 group by Year", the executionplan looks like
select year from dbo.table1 group by year110NULLNULL1NULL4NULLNULLNULL86,21644NULLNULLSELECT0NULL |--Stream Aggregate(GROUP BY:([Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR]))121Stream AggregateAggregateGROUP BY:([Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR])NULL406E-061186,21644[Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR]NULLPLAN_ROW01 |--Parallelism(Gather Streams, ORDER BY:([Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR] ASC))132ParallelismGather StreamsORDER BY:([Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR] ASC)NULL800,028547491186,21643[Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR]NULLPLAN_ROW11 |--Stream Aggregate(GROUP BY:([Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR]))143Stream AggregateAggregateGROUP BY:([Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR])NULL803,6248431186,18788[Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR]NULLPLAN_ROW11 |--Clustered Index Scan(OBJECT:([Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[PK_Table1]), ORDERED FORWARD)154Clustered Index ScanClustered Index ScanOBJECT:([Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[PK_Table1]), ORDERED FORWARD[Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR]1,449936E+0774,588317,9747291182,56304[Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR]NULLPLAN_ROW11
Now, with another index IX_Hits on hits and the same sql query, sql server now takes IX_Hits instead of PK_table1. And, it takes more time. Any idea why?
select Year from dbo.table1 group by Year110NULLNULL1NULL4NULLNULLNULL85,54985NULLNULLSELECT0NULL |--Sort(DISTINCT ORDER BY:([Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR] ASC))121SortDistinct SortDISTINCT ORDER BY:([Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR] ASC)NULL40,011261260,0001374511185,54985[Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR]NULLPLAN_ROW01 |--Parallelism(Gather Streams)132ParallelismGather StreamsNULLNULL800,028507491185,53845[Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR]NULLPLAN_ROW11 |--Hash Match(Partial Aggregate, HASH:([Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR]), RESIDUAL:([Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR] = [Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR]))143Hash MatchPartial AggregateHASH:([Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR]), RESIDUAL:([Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR] = [Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR])NULL8049,63581185,50995[Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR]NULLPLAN_ROW11 |--Index Scan(OBJECT:([Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[IX_Table1_Hits]))154Index ScanIndex ScanOBJECT:([Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[IX_Table1_Hits])[Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR]1,449936E+0727,899427,9747291135,87415[Testdb].[dbo].[Table1].[YEAR]NULLPLAN_ROW11
I have created a very simple table. Here is the script:
if exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id = object_id(N'[dbo].[IndexTable]') and OBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsUserTable') = 1) drop table [dbo].[IndexTable]
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[IndexTable] ( [Id] [int] NOT NULL , [Code] [nvarchar] (50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL ) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX [CusteredOnCode] ON [dbo].[IndexTable]([Id]) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[IndexTable] ADD CONSTRAINT [PrimaryKeyOnId] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED ( [Id] ) ON [PRIMARY] GO
The records that i added are:
Id Code
1 a 2 b 3 aa 4 bb
Now when i query like
Select * from IndexTable
I expect the results as:
Id Code
1 a 3 aa 2 b 4 bb
as i have the clustered index on column Code.
But i m getting the results as:
Id Code
1 a 2 b 3 aa 4 bb
as per the primary key order that is a non clustered index.
But when I tried to input my data like 'abc', '123 abc' 'abc ','123 abc'
SQL server won't recognize 'abc' and 'abc ' is a different value if the last character is a space. Is there a way to make it as a different value? I tried to drop the primary and input the data. When I ran a group by the name column, 'abc' show 2 instead of 1. Seems SQL server is trying to ignore the space at the end too.
I also noticed unique index have the same problem too. Please help.
I'm working with a legacy database whose structure I cannot change. I'm building a web-based editor for one of the DB's tables. This table has a Primary Key called "Master_Idx" that is an Identity (autonumber) field.To start, I query the DB and populate a data table which is cached. This is used to "feed" the web form. Any additions, changes, and deletions are reflected in this cached table.The user then has the flexibility to press Save at any time, which ensures that the database is modified accordingly.Here's my question:When new records are added, I assign them a Master_Idx value, the first of which was calculated to be 1 + the Max(Master_Idx) value when the editing session started. But when I insert these records back into the database it's possible that another user might have also been doing similar editing (of different records from the same table), so there's no guarantee that the Master_Idx values in the data table will be identical to those in the DB. When I insert a record from the cached table back into the DB, what technique can I use to check what value was assigned to the Master_Idx? If it's not the same as in the cached table then I need to update it locally in a few places.I hope all of this makes sense but if it doesn't then let me know and I'll explain it in another way.Robert W.
I am making a program in Visual Basic .NET with SQL Server 2000.
I have a table "MyTable" with a primary key named "Id". The primary key is 'Create Unique' checked and 'Index' selected. When I insert all the fields required, except "Id" of course, I need the new record's "Id" in my VisualBasic program, but I don't know how...
I must do one of them, but don't know how either of them:
-Create a trigger on insertion that will send to the user that sended the insert command the "Id" of the record just created.
or
-get the command in Visual Basic that will send the Insert command with a return field ("Id")
just i see a database and a table 'tbl_OutBox_MT' where there is now primary key and have index (non unique, non cluster). and it store almost 3000000 data per everyday. and wipe out data from their and archive all data to other location and broadcast this table 'tbl_OutBox_MT' by mobile operator everyday from morning to evening. but when it perform broadcast it to mobile operator it takes huge time. because this table gather data from different sources (tables) by using complex query and INSER INTO statement and insert into this table.
I need to perform first, my observation is there is no primary key. when i run any complex query into this table it takes huge time and sometimes shows transaction deadlock error.
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tbl_OutBox_MT]( [TRAN_ID] [varchar](36) NOT NULL, [OUT_MSG_ID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [OUT_MSG_ID_TELCO] AS (CONVERT([bigint],((((CONVERT([varchar](4),datepart(year,[PROCESS_TIME]),(0))+case len(CONVERT([varchar](2),datepart(month,[PROCESS_TIME]),(0))) when (1) then '0' else '' end)
I am trying to drop a primary key on column LID and then create a clustered index on a new identity column ID and then add the primary key back on the LID. I am not able to do so due the table being in replication. here is the error:
Cannot alter the table '' because it is being published for replication.
How do I get past the error and create the Clustered Index on ID column in both publisher and subscriber?
Hi All,I have a database that is serving a web site with reasonably hightraffiic.We're getting errors at certain points where processes are beinglocked. In particular, one of our people has suggested that an updatestatement contained within a stored procedure that uses a wherecondition that only touches on a column that has a clustered primaryindex on it will still cause a table lock.So, for example:UPDATE ORDERS SETprod = @product,val = @valWHERE ordid = @ordidIn this case ordid has a clustered primary index on it.Can anyone tell me if this would be the case, and if there's a way ofensuring that we are only doing a row lock on the record specified inthe where condition?Many, many thanks in advance!Much warmth,Murray
We are going to use SQL Sever change tracking. The problem is that some of our tables, which are to be tracked, have no primary keys. There are only unique clustered indexes. The question is what is the best way to turn on change tracking for these tables in our circumstances.
I desire to have a clustered index on a column other than the Primary Key. I have a few junction tables that I may want to alter, create table, or ...
I have practiced with an example table that is not really a junction table. It is just a table I decided to use for practice. When I execute the script, it seems to do everything I expect. For instance, there are not any constraints but there are indexes. The PK is the correct column.
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tblNotificationMgr]( [NotificationMgrKey] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [ContactKey] [int] NOT NULL, [EventTypeEnum] [tinyint] NOT NULL,
I have created two tables. table one has the following fields,
Id -> unique clustered index. table two has the following fields, Tid -> unique clustered index Id -> foreign key of table one(id).
Now I have created primary key for the table one column 'id'. It's created as "nonclustered, unique, primary key located on PRIMARY". Primary key create clustered index default. since unique clustered index existed in table one, it has created "Nonclustered primary key".
My Question is, What is the difference between "clustered, unique, primary key" and "nonclustered, unique, primary key"? Is there any performance impact between these?
my stored procedure have one table variable (@t_Replenishment_Rpt).I want to create an Index on this table variable.please advise any of them in this loop... below is my table variable and I need to create 3 indexes on this...
