Hi,
I've got some tables which are indexed on primary key and a couple of search columns.
I've also got some views based on these tables, some are quite complex. Do I index the views on the same search columns or do they automatically index themselves based on the tables they reference?
Thanks
Hi
I want to know is a flat file faster than a RDBMS for indexing for example a search engine indexing would a flat file be better in terms of performance, scalability etc than a RDBMS?
Hi,
The other day we tried online re-indexing feature of SQL 2005 and it€™s performing faster than offline re-indexing. Could you please validate if it€™s supposed to do be this way? I always thought offline should be faster than online.
Thanks,
Ritesh
Fellow database developers,I would like to draw on your experience with views. I have a databasethat includes many views. Sometimes, views contains other views, andthose views in turn may contain views. In fact, I have some views inmy database that are a product of nested views of up to 6 levels deep!The reason we did this was.1. Object-oriented in nature. Makes it easy to work with them.2. Changing an underlying view (adding new fields, removing etc),automatically the higher up views inherit this new information. Thismake maintenance very easy.3. These nested views are only ever used for the reporting side of ourapplication, not for the day-to-day database use by the application.We use Crystal Reports and Crystal is smart enough (can't believe Ijust said that about Crystal) to only pull back the fields that arebeing accessed by the report. In other words, Crystal will issue aSelect field1, field2, field3 from ReportingView Where .... eventhough "ReportingView" contains a long list of fields.Problems I can see.1. Parent views generally use "Select * From childview". This meansthat we have to execute a "sp_refreshview" command against all viewswhenever child views are altered.2. Parent views return a lot of information that isn't necessarilyused.3. Makes it harder to track down exactly where the information iscoming from. You have to drill right through to the child view to seethe raw table joins etc.Does anyone have any comments on this database design? I would love tohear your opinions and tales from the trenches.Best regards,Rod.
View 15 Replies View RelatedWhich is more efficient? One large view that joins >=10 tables, or a few smaller views that join only the tables needed for individual pages?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHello.
Newbie here. I've only been using SQL for about a year now and have some minor questions about sql objects that reference other objects.
We have some views which reference other views in the joins. I will call one the primary view and the one being referenced in the joins as the secondary view.
Recently we made changes to the secondary view.
After which the primary views which referenced it would not work because of this change and had to be 'refreshed' by using drop/create scripts which essentially just dropped it and recreated the exact same view. I do not recall the exact error message that was returned other than it seemed to suggest that it could no longer see the secondary view since it had been changed. Nothing in the primary view was changed in any way, just the secondary.
Some here where I work have suggested off hand that this was a recompile of the primary view because the contents of the secondary changed.
My questions are:
1. Exactly why did this happen and is there a proper name for it when it does?
2. The same problem does not seem to occur when we have stored procedures referencing views in the joins which had just been changed. Why is that?
Thanks for any help on the matter. I greatly appreciate it.
Hello,
to make a report easier I'm developing it using a view of joined views of joined views.
Is there any significant performance penalty as opposed to just having one big select?
Cheers.
Hello There,I'm trying to create a view that has calculations dependent oncalculations, where the problem resides is that each time I make acalculation I must create an intermediate view so I can reference aprevious calculation.for example lets say I have my_table that has columns a & b. now I wanta view that has a & b, c = a + b, and d = c + 1.this is grossly simplified, the calculations I actually use are fairlycomplex and copying / pasting them is out of the question.so what I have is my_view_a which makes column c, and my my_view_finalwhich makes column d (however, in my real application I have 5 of theseviews, a/b/c/d/e/)is there anyway I can consolidate all these views into one? I wasthinking of using a stored procedure with temp tables or somethingalong those lines.I just which I can use the aliases that I create for c in d in onestep.any insight would be greatly appreciated.
View 5 Replies View RelatedHi!! I dont know if this is the correct forum for this or not, but still...Actually i wanted to know some details about SQl's Indexing services.
I found this link on my hosters help pages :
You need to use SQL Query Analyzer tool for this.
This will enable full-text indexing for the current database:exec sp_fulltext_database 'enable'
This creates a catalog:exec sp_fulltext_catalog 'catalogname', 'create'
This enables indexing of a table:exec sp_fulltext_table 'tablename', 'create','catalogname', 'indexname'
This adds a column to an index:exec sp_fulltext_column 'tablename', 'columnname', 'add'
This activates fulltext on a table:exec sp_fulltext_table 'tablename', 'activate'
These two enable automatic filling of the full-text index when changes occur to a table:exec sp_fulltext_table 'tablename','start_change_tracking'exec sp_fulltext_table 'tablename','start_background_updateindex'
From the above i get that i need to set up my database for indexing then make a catalog and then add an index of a table to this catalog. Can anyone point any good tutorials for using this is the proper way so that performance is not affected and tells me details on updating indexes etc(esp using some criterias). Moreover does indexing columns lower the performance? Is there a workaround? I am completely new to this.
What should I be looking at if I have real-time data (constant transactions) writing to a table that is experiencing index type problems? The table needs to constantly be re-indexed, which is slowing the whole transaction process down.
What can I look at or do to rectify this?
Thanks!
Hi,
Can you please help me find out if this statement is always true:
"Adding a new Index slows down updates"
This is more a general question, applicable as well for SQL Server.
If this is not the appropriate subforum then I kindly ask an moderator to move this thread to the appropriate sub-forum.
Thank you,
Ronnyy
Few questions about Indexing on tables:
1) How do I find out if there is any indexing already existing on the tables?
2) How often should tables be re-indexed?
3) Can you refer me to some useful article that talks about basics of indexing and how it could affect peformance?
Thanks
D.Harinath writes "Hi!
What is exact purpose of indexing.How it will increase the performance of the quey.
Can u give me example
*******with code********[not an theory]
For 1)Cluster and Non-Cluster indexing.
when Should use cluster and should not user cluster .What is major diffrence b/w them."
Okay, so i've been creating a .net app that basically gathers data from a web page, and then passes the parameters to a s.p. i wrote in sql, fetches a count, and displays the data to the webpage. My problem layes in that i have the query command timeout set to 1:00 but alot of my quries on the larger tables take longer then that to complete, so the page is timing out quite often.
i KNOW my problem is database design, i'm running an OLAP database. trasactions only occur once a week when we run a federal DO_NOT_CALL database update. i was wondering if anyone would be so kind as to help me tune my database a little more the get some more juice out of it. i can also tell you guys that i've notice every time a query is ran, the Diqk Query length tacs out to nearlly 100% for the entire length of the query. dont know if that helps.
Hi evryone...
I have a problem on indexing. The field PK_hrSetBenefitsLeave is the primary key of the table "hrSetBenefitsLeave". When i see it on the "Manage Indexes and Keys", the identity name became PK_hrSetBenefitsLeave_1. Everytime i change it to its original name will get me error...and i can't save it.
Error msg on saving :
'hrSetBenefitsLeave' table
- Unable to create index 'PK_hrSetBenefitsLeave'.
There is already an object named 'PK_hrSetBenefitsLeave' in the database.
Could not create constraint. See previous errors.
I tried to check using this query.
Select * from Information_Schema.Columns where column_name = 'PK_hrSetBenefitsLeave'
- it gives me only 1 record
my_compdbohrSetBenefitsLeavePK_hrSetBenefitsLeave1NULLNOchar55NULLNULLNULLNULLNULLNULLiso_1NULLNULLSQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_ASNULLNULLNULL
Thanks.
-RON
RON
________________________________________________________________________________________________
"I won't last a day without SQL"
Hello,I need some help understanding why my indexes do not seem to be affecting mysearches. I would really appreciate help understanding what indexes I needto make this query run faster. I realize that I use wildcards when searchingfor g1.gene_name, but is there anything I can do to make that less of aproblem? I ran EXPLAIN on the search I wanted to optimize and got thefollowing:EXPLAIN SELECT c1.SFID FROM Gene g1, cDNA c1, Transcript t1, Refseq r1 WHERE(c1.SFID = t1.cDNA_SFID AND t1.gene_SFID = g1.SFID AND (g1.gene_sym = 'hh'OR g1.genbank_acc = 'hh' OR g1.gene_name LIKE '%hh%')) OR (c1.genbank_acc ='hh' OR c1.SUID = 'hh') OR (c1.SFID = t1.cDNA_SFID AND t1.gene_SFID =g1.SFID AND g1.locuslink_id = r1.locuslink_id AND (r1.mRNA_acc = 'hh'));+-------+-------+--------------------------+------+---------+------+--------+-------------------------+| table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows| Extra |+-------+-------+--------------------------+------+---------+------+--------+-------------------------+| r1 | index | mRNA_acc,llid,rma,rllid | rma | 25 | NULL | 20093| Using index || g1 | ALL | PRIMARY,llid,ggs,gga,gll | NULL | NULL | NULL | 190475| || c1 | ALL | PRIMARY,cga,cs | NULL | NULL | NULL | 43714| where used || t1 | index | gene_SFID,gS,cS,tg,tc | gS | 4 | NULL | 47238| where used; Using index |+-------+-------+--------------------------+------+---------+------+--------+-------------------------+I have the following indexes (which were all added after the database waspopulated):ALTER TABLE cDNA ADD INDEX cga(genbank_acc, SFID);ALTER TABLE cDNA ADD INDEX co(organism, SFID);ALTER TABLE cDNA ADD INDEX cs(SUID, SFID);ALTER TABLE Gene ADD INDEX ggs(gene_sym, SFID);ALTER TABLE Gene ADD INDEX gga(genbank_acc, SFID);ALTER TABLE Gene ADD INDEX ggn(gene_name, SFID);ALTER TABLE Gene ADD INDEX go(organism, SFID);ALTER TABLE Gene ADD INDEX gll(locuslink_id, SFID);ALTER TABLE Gene ADD INDEX gui(unigene_id, SFID);ALTER TABLE Transcript ADD INDEX tg(gene_SFID, cDNA_SFID);ALTER TABLE Transcript ADD INDEX tc(cDNA_SFID);ALTER TABLE Refseq ADD INDEX rma(mRNA_acc, locuslink_id);ALTER TABLE Refseq ADD INDEX rllid(locuslink_id);
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi,
There is a table which I regularly run a select query on.
The select query always has a fixed where clause on only three of the columns with different parameters.
This is a query that runs each time:
select * from tblData
where
PersonNo = 2 and EmployeeType = 4 and DataDate = getdate()
This are the types of indexes the table currently has:
One index for each of these three fields
i.e. index1 for PersonNo
index2 for EmployeeType
index3 for DataDate
In addition to the above, I also have created a covering index as follows
index4 for PersonNo,EmployeeType,DataDate
Is what I have enough for indexes on this table please?
Is there anything else I have to do on indexing this table?
Thanks
I need some help with MS Indexing Services, and there doesn't seem to be much support for it on the web. Do you know of any good forums or sites?I'm using MS Indexing Services to power the search feature on my site. Should I be using something else like Sharepoint?
View 4 Replies View RelatedIf you put an index on an integer type column named 'test_column' in a table that had 1,000,000,000 rows in it, and you said select top 50 * from test_table WHERE test_column = 1 since 'test_column' has an index, that would perform extremly fast wouldn't it? Cheers
View 5 Replies View RelatedHi All,
I am working on SQL Server 7.0. Every weekend we go for reindexing of some tables. I want to know if it is possible to run the re-indexing of tables in parallel so that I can save time.
Our database is of size 80GB and one table is around 22GB. Rebuilding of index on this table takes a lot of time and we are unable to index the other tables.
Any solutions/suggestions are mostly appreciated.
Regards,
Mitra
Hoping someone could me with an ongoing indexing question that I have.
On my site, we have over the past 5 years developed what is emerging as a fairly complicated dbase structure, as features have been added to my site and relations have increased between different database tables, there has been a need to index fields in different ways, and in some instances field indexing has overlapped. For example we may have a table that has 5 fields (field1,field2,field3,field4,field5). A need to index field1 is requried because of a query that reads:
SELECT * From Table1 where field1=XXXXX
Additionally there may be a need to for another query that reads:
SELECT * From Table1 where field2=XXXXX
In this instance an index is placed on field2....
But, for example when there is the following query:
SELECT * From Table1 where field1=XXXXX and field2 = XXXXX
Is it necessary to set a new index on: field1,field2 ???
We have made the choice that yes, in fact there is...but now over time some of our tables have instances of single fields being indexed along with combinations of two single fields that have already been indexed, being indexed together. As tables have grown to over 1,000,000 records and having up to 15 or so indexes, we realize that the number of indexes maybe degrading performance. Also, indexes vary in type, e.g INT,BIGINT,Varchar fields... In the above instance, can we eliminate the multi-indexes and improve performance over all...?
On a second related question:
In the event that two tables are joined on a common field.
e.g. Select * from Table1,Table2 where Table1.field1=Table2.field1
Is it necessary to index both of these fields in tables: Table1 and Table2 ?
Hope someone can help, as we are looking to improve the efficiency of our tables as they continue to grow.
I have a database with no index on any table,
I have to pull out records from them, process them and insert into a
set of table in another database. There is no one to one mapping. What
I have been doing is get the data into cursor and manipulate row by row
and insert to target tables. This is very slow even for few thousand
records and we have to do it for few hundred thousands.
The process takes long time to run (hours for 20000 records). I created indexes to speed up the
operation, but with index my process just hangs, I have put some print
statements within the transaction loop that also does not appear on
ISQL, it appears only after I kill the process.
It's all confusing to me, index is not helping at all. I checked the
query plan for queries after creating index, it displays fine but the
stored procedure just stops.
Hi,
I’m using SQL Server 2000. I have a table called Contacts and I would like to be able to have the UserID as an indexed column and to ignore duplicates. I set up the following properties within my SQL Server database table:
Table Name: Contacts
Selected Index: IX_UserID
Column Name: UserID
Order: Ascending
Create Unique
Index
Ignore Duplicate Key
Every time I try to enter duplicates for the UserID column; I get an error that says, “Cannot enter duplicate key row in object ‘Contacts’. Can anyone explain this? Is it possible to create an index column with duplicate data?
Thanks,
Denise
Folks,
I am not really sure how the whole indexing side of MS SQL works (I'm a noob), so my question has 2 parts:
1) Does SQL store every Index in memory?
2) If so, can I perform a SELECT on a table's index(s) without hitting the disk?
For example: I have a table with a column called "Id" which is of type uniqueidentifier. I want to select all of the "Id"s in the table without accessing the server's hard drive (get info from memory).
Thanks in advance!
-agartee
I'm looking for some help on how i should index this table.
current table has about 500k records in it.
the fields in the table are:
member_num (varchar(12), not null)
first_name (varchar(20), null)
last_name (varchar(20), null)
ssn (varchar(50), null)
address1 (nvarchar(200), null)
address2 (nvarchar(200), null)
city (nvarchar(200), null)
state (nvarchar(200), null)
zip (nvarchar(100), null)
phone1 (nvarchar(50), null)
all of the fields are searchable through an asp.net webform.
my first stab at this consisted of creating a clustered index on member_num and then creating a separate index for each of the remaining fields.
Sorry its been a while since I was taught about indexes, Can I place indexes on both FK fields of a Associative table?and what is the recommended number of rows to place an index on a table for SQL server (if different from other DBMS)?and also whats a clustered index?
View 2 Replies View Relatedi have to make the following but i have no clue any help will be appreciated
i have to search through three tables based on user preferences.
the tablkes are author name, book name and topics.( i have created ttables and their relations)
now i want to the user to select the option from the drop down menu. The problem is how do i ascertain(dynamically) which table to search based on the action selected by the user. Thanks
Hi,
I am new to this forum, could any one help me in scripting the INDEXING on all the databases which runs weekly basis on setting up through the JOB.
I thank everyone who help in this urgent request.
Regards
Dear All,
in my current databases, indexing is very poor. same columns are having clustered index and non clustered indexes. is there any tool to help me out?
i'm thinking in this way...please correct me if i'm thinking wrong...
1) i'm planning to drop all the indexes first.
2) i'm planning to create clustered index on ID column.
3) i'm planning to create non clustered index on some columns which are using where conditions.(many procedures and functions, as well as report queries).
4)planning to run the index rebuild script everday at non-peak time
5)planning to run the index defragmentation script every week at non-peak time
6) planning to run shrink database command every week.
please correct me and add flavour with your great experience.
thank you very much
Arnav
Even you learn 1%, Learn it with 100% confidence.
Hi all,
I have a column which i want to put inside ascending indices, that is, empty column which i want to enter
1,2,3,4.....[tble no. of rows]
so this table:
col1 | col2 | col3
-------------------
| a | b
| c | d
| e | f
becomes:
col1 | col2 | col3
-------------------
1 | a | b
2 | c | d
3 | e | f
thnks,
Ahron
Okay, so first off, here is a sample query i'm using:
SELECT o.state_abbrv, count(o.state_abbrv) as kount FROM dbo.mortgage o WHERE 1 = 1
and per1_age>=20
and wealth_rating>=1
and hm_purprice>=100 --6 sec / 3 sec
AND oo_mtg_amnt >= 100
and est_inc >= 'B'
and per1_ms='M'
and hm_year_build>='1905'
and oo_mtg_lender_name<>' '
and oo_mtg_rate_t in ('f','v')
and oo_mtg_loan_t in ('c','f')
and hm_purdate>='20000101'
and child_pres='y'
and zip in (85302,85029)
and state_abbrv in ('az')
and rtrim(city)+' '+state_abbrv in ('glendale az','phoenix az')
and rtrim(county_name)+' '+state_abbrv in ('maricopa az')
and substring(phone,1,3) in ('602','623')
group by o.state_abbrv ORDER BY o.state_abbrv
i'm trying to fine tune the database to come back with quries in less then 30 seconds. EVERY query ran will be a count.
i've managed to fine tune it to the point where anything above the rtrim(city) comes back in about 3-7 seconds. my problem is everything below that. i cant seem to get a query to respond fast enough, any recommendations? i've tried pluging the whole query into the index tuning wizard and it gives me nothing.
here is the database layout:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[mortgage] (
[fips_state] [char] (2) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[state_abbrv] [char] (2) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[zip] [char] (5) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[zip_four] [char] (4) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[del_point] [char] (3) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[car_rte] [char] (4) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[city_abbrv] [varchar] (13) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[city] [varchar] (28) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[addr_house_num] [varchar] (10) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[addr_pre_dir] [varchar] (2) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[addr_st_name] [varchar] (28) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[addr_st_suff] [varchar] (4) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[addr_post_dir] [varchar] (2) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[addr_unit_des] [varchar] (6) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[addr_unit_desnum] [varchar] (8) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[address1] [varchar] (30) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[fips_cnty] [char] (3) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[county_name] [varchar] (25) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[census_tract] [char] (6) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[census_block] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[lattitude] [char] (9) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[longitude] [char] (10) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[fips_ispsa] [char] (5) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[wealth_rating] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[time_zone] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[phone] [char] (10) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[homeowner] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[est_inc] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per1_fname] [varchar] (15) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per1_mi] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per1_lname] [varchar] (20) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per1_title] [varchar] (6) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per1_gender] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per1_dob] [char] (8) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per1_ageconf] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per1_age] [char] (2) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per1_msconf] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per1_ms] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per2_fname] [char] (15) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per2_mi] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per2_lname] [varchar] (20) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per2_title] [varchar] (6) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per2_gender] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per2_dob] [char] (8) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per2_ageconf] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[per2_age] [char] (2) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[child_pres] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[child_0_3] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[child_0_3_gender] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[child_4_6] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[child_4_6_gender] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[child_7_9] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[child_7_9_gender] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[child_10_12] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[child_10_12_gender] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[child_13_18] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[child_13_18_gender] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[religious_contrib] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[political_contrib] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[health_contrib] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[general_contrib] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[hm_purprice] [char] (8) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[hm_purdate] [char] (8) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[hm_year_build] [char] (4) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[donate_env] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[char_contrib] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[pres_cc] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[pres_perm_cc] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[oo_mtg_amnt] [char] (8) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[oo_mtg_lender_name] [varchar] (25) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[oo_mtg_rate] [char] (4) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[oo_mtg_rate_t] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[oo_mtg_loan_t] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[dnc] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[oo_refi_deed_date] [char] (8) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[oo_refi_amnt] [char] (4) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[oo_refi_lender_name] [varchar] (25) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[oo_refi_rate_t] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[oo_refi_month_term] [char] (4) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL ,
[oo_refi_loan_t] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE INDEX [mortgage1] ON [dbo].[mortgage]([oo_mtg_rate_t], [state_abbrv], [wealth_rating], [est_inc], [per1_age], [per1_ms], [hm_purprice], [hm_purdate], [hm_year_build], [oo_mtg_amnt], [oo_mtg_lender_name], [oo_mtg_loan_t]) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE INDEX [mortgage11] ON [dbo].[mortgage]([oo_mtg_rate_t], [state_abbrv], [zip], [wealth_rating], [phone], [est_inc], [per1_age], [per1_ms], [hm_purprice], [hm_purdate], [hm_year_build], [oo_mtg_amnt], [oo_mtg_lender_name], [oo_mtg_loan_t]) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE INDEX [mortgage2] ON [dbo].[mortgage]([oo_mtg_rate_t], [state_abbrv], [wealth_rating], [phone], [est_inc], [per1_age], [per1_ms], [child_pres], [hm_purprice], [hm_purdate], [hm_year_build], [oo_mtg_amnt], [oo_mtg_lender_name], [oo_mtg_loan_t]) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
CREATE INDEX [mortgage4] ON [dbo].[mortgage]([zip]) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
i assume thie issue is the substring.
any assistance would be GREAT!
Okay, so I am writing a program that takes any combination of about 30 parameter passed via .ASPX and Visual Basic Code. my question is this, do have to create an index for each possible combination of parameters in order to get the query to come back REALLY fast?
or would it be maybe a better method to have the program pass Every parameter even if it would be selecting all the data and just setting up a few indexes?
What say you O' SQL Gods/Goddesses
Hi folks,
I have setup a re-indexing job on a sql2005 server.
It runs great. But...
in the morning the first Transaction log backup equals almost the size of the entire database. Am I missing something here.
I am looking at a similar job on SQL 7 and the transaction logs are not changing much from normal.
Regards
Paresh Motiwala
Boston, USA