I have my SQLDataSource configured as shown in the picture. I ran the Execute Query and input an ID I know is in the database and it returned nothing. I ran into this probelm on another part of my site and i got it working by using 2 SQLDataSources, but im trying to keep the amount of code down.
http://junk.icore-studios.com/junk/Codeissues/Innerjoins.JPG
Any ideas on why it would be behaving this way?
I have a conditional split in an SSIS package - one split is where if rows are returned according to a specific rule, then insert those rows into to a Recordset Destinationm which points to a variable of Object type.
How I can use this variable to email fellow users. For example, what I would like is if ANY rows are returned to the Object variable (1 or more), then I would like to execute an email SP that we have on our server.
Here's my basic syntax:
Code:
select
dma.dma_market_area,
count(fc.contactid) as Number_Of_QCs,
(case when fc.ctca_currenttier = 1 then count(fc.contactid) end) as P1,
(case when fc.ctca_currenttier = 2 then count(fc.contactid) end) as P2,
(case when fc.ctca_currenttier = 3 then count(fc.contactid) end) as P3,
(case when fc.ctca_currenttier = 4 then count(fc.contactid) end) as c1,
(case when fc.ctca_currenttier = 5 then count(fc.contactid) end) as c2,
(case when fc.ctca_currenttier = 6 then count(fc.contactid) end) as c3
from ...
And then I get output like this:
dma_market_areaNumber_Of_QCsP1P2P3c1c2c3
ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY66NULLNULLNULLNULLNULL
ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY1NULL1NULLNULLNULLNULL
ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY1NULLNULLNULL1NULLNULL
ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY1NULLNULLNULLNULLNULL1
How can I get there all to group to one row, based on the first column?
W2k3 server, SQL 2005.
@@version = Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.1399.06 (Intel X86)
Standard Edition on Windows NT 5.2
(Build 3790: Service Pack 1)
I have my first SSIS package almost working, but I'm having an odd problem and can't find any information to help resolve it.
I'm importing from a flat file (csv) to an existing table (append). I've got a Derived Column transformation in the middle to do some data cleanup. It's all working except for one little problem...
One of the transformations is 'REPLACE([Column 3],"^","; ")', output to a new column. (The input file has a field that uses carets as delimiters between an unknown number of items; I'm changing that to semicolons for easier reading.) Not all rows have data in this column, some will have one item, some will have multiple items.
The REPLACE works except that it fills in repeated data for all the blank rows.
Example:
Incoming data is:
1 Smith,Jane^Jones,Jane
2 Brown,John
3
4 Adams,James^Adams,Jim
5
6 White,Debra
Data inserted into the table is:
1 Smith,Jane; Jones,Jane
2 Brown,John
3 Brown,John
4 Adams,James; Adams,Jim
5 Adams,James; Adams,Jim
6 White,Debra
I've tried to use a Conditional to skip the empty rows, but I can't get that working at all (get syntax errors no matter what I put in).
Any suggestions on how to fix this would be most appreciated!
Thank you.
Hi,
Any idea why when I run a SELECT stament in Query anaylser it returns 45 rows. But when I create the exact same SQL as a view in Enterprise manager it only returns 44 rows?
Thanks,
Alph
I am using SQLExecute() in C++ code.
My query is "select * from Revoked_users"?
How I will come to know the no. of rows returned by SQLExecute() ?
The code below returns 0 rows. The statement is intended as generic statement that would return all records between a particular start and end date and on each date only between a specific start and end time. It works perfectly if the end date is greater than the start date.
Unfortunately, if the start and end dates are equal (i.e, return all records on that one date and only between the specified start and end times) then no records are returned.
BTW, it is also looking for matching datetimes in two tables and there really is matching data in the two tables for that particular date and times.
Can anybody help resolve this?
SELECT DISTINCT t1.* FROM [DbName].[SchemaName].[TableName1] AS t1,
[DbName].[SchemaName].[TableName2] AS t2
WHERE t1.[DateTime] BETWEEN CAST('2006-11-22' AS DATETIME) AND CAST('2006-11-22' AS DATETIME)
AND t2.[DateTime] BETWEEN CAST('2006-11-22' AS DATETIME) AND CAST('2006-11-22' AS DATETIME) AND
CONVERT(DATETIME,CONVERT(varchar, t1.[DateTime],114)) BETWEEN
CONVERT(DATETIME, '10:20:00') AND CONVERT(DATETIME, '12:19:59') AND
CONVERT(DATETIME,CONVERT(varchar, t2.[DateTime],114)) BETWEEN
CONVERT(DATETIME, '10:20:00') AND CONVERT(DATETIME, '12:19:59') AND
t1.[DateTime] = t2.[DateTime]
ORDER BY t1.[DateTime];
I have a qry/dataset in a report. If the qry returns no data the report will
simply show a the headers/footers and no data in the detail section. However, I need to display all zeros if the detail section ie '0', if no data is returned. How can I do that?
I have SSRS 2005.
Hello and thank you taking a moment. I have created a simple login page where the user will pass credentials. I have a sqldatasource that will query a database to see if the user exists. What I would like to do is have the user click a button after entering their credentials. When the button is clicked I would like the SqlDatasource SelectCommand to fire and if there are rows returned then redirect the user to a new page.
I know I can do this with ADO and a datareader with the HasRows property. But what I would eventually like to do is cache the data and then bind the cached data to a control(like a dataview) on the page the user is redirected to. If anyone can tell me how to get the Select command to fire on a button click I would be eternally grateful. Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Jason
I want to select data from a table with 5.000.000 rows. It's very slowly. Do you now, how I can select only a XY number of rows? I can't use TOP in select query. User see only 20-30 rows on his page, but he can use page_up, page_down. Is possible to something as lazy load?
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to get the number of Rows returned by a stored procedure in a profiler ?
if yes, what parameters shud I be looking for?
THanks
Harshal
I have a large table with approx 250000 rows in sql 2000. I need toreturn this from an asp page but the query to return this amount ofdata causes the asp to time out before the query completes.Is there any way in ado (or another way useable from asp / vb) that Ican run the query and then fetch a number of rows at a time? I can thene.g. pass the first batch of rows back to the client and then call forthe second batch.Any thoughts appreciated.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi,I have a select statment that correctly returns zero rows at times. Iwould like to be able to return the value 0 (a single row with thevalue 0) whenever the logic returns zero rows.something like thisIf no.of.rows.returned = 0 thenoutput 0elseoutput query resultsend ifCan anyone poing me in the right direction to do this?many thanks,yohan
View 6 Replies View RelatedI running a query that returns a information from many tables. I need a way to compare the row returned to the previous row. This query currently returns the requested information for everytime an item placed. I need the query to return only the most recent order information. I can do this by doing a basic loop comparing the jobmatl.item and po.order_date. If the jobmatl.item match between the current row and last row compare the dates and keep the oldest.
Declare
@assembly ItemType
SET @assembly = '1110-2014'
SET @assembly = ISNULL(@assembly, '%')
SELECT
DISTINCT
jobmatl.item
, item.description
, item.drawing_nbr
, jobmatl.matl_qty
, itemloc.qty_on_hand
, vendaddr.name
, po.order_date
FROM
jobmatl with (nolock)
inner join item with (nolock) on item.item = jobmatl.item
inner join job with (nolock) on jobmatl.job = job.job
inner join poitem with (nolock) on item.item = poitem.item
inner join po with (nolock) on poitem.po_num = po.po_num
inner join vendaddr with (nolock) on vendaddr.vend_num = po.vend_num
inner join itemloc with (nolock) on itemloc.item = item.item
WHERE
jobmatl.job < ' 990000'
AND
job.item LIKE @assembly
ORDER BY
jobmatl.item
, po.order_date
I have a report that calls a stored procedure. I want to display the number of records that the stored procedure returned. I can't seem to find an expression that will do this. Is there an expression that will display the record count for a dataset?
Thanks,
Rob
The following query only brings back too much data in the table - there are duplicates and the lab it shows is wrong.
The problem is:
AND a.calLab = f.ID
in the Where statement.
Some equipment does not need calibration, so, a.calDueDate = 0 AND a.calLab would be NULL or 0.
tblLabs ID field has 1 - 18 (Labs) - no 0 and of course no null
I need to get the rest of the data.
Any suggestions?
Thanks.....
Zath
SELECT a.assignedID,
b.Manufacturer,
a.modelNumber,
a.serialNumber,
e.equipmentType,
a.Description,
c.Location,
d.Status,
a.modifiedDate,
a.modifiedBy,
a.Notes,
a.Picture,
f.LabName,
a.calibrationRequired,
a.calDate,
a.CalDueDate,
a.assetNumber,
a.ID
FROM tblEquipments a,
tblManufacturers b,
tblLocation c,
tblStatus d,
tblEquipment_Type e,
tblLabs f
WHERE a.manufacturer = b.manufacturerID
AND a.location = c.locationID
AND a.Status = d.statusID
AND a.EquipmentType = e.ID
AND (a.calLab = f.ID or a.calLab Is NULL or a.calLab = 0)
ORDER BY a.ID
hello,
i have a stored procedure SELECT CommentID, UserName, CommentingDate
FROM Comm
WHERE PictureID = @PictureID
ORDER BY CommentingDate DESC
witch shows me the users who commented a Picture with PictureID = x
I need to add two rows at that stored procedure, one to show the number of total comments at that picutre (like counting the number of rows returned) and the second to show count the DISTINCT users who commented that picture
I tryied with COUNT but i have to use GROUP BY and i don't think this is good...
I hope you understand... please help me,
thanks
Is there a way to limit the number of rows returned by a SqlDataReader? I know I can do it by modifying the Stored Procedure, but I'd rather not modify a procedure that is used in multiple apps. I'm hoping there is something easy like setting SqlDataReader.RowsReturned = 100, but that might be too easy to hope for.
View 10 Replies View RelatedAs a part of my unpaid internship, I am creating a ASP.NET interface for a MS SQL Server 2000. The table I am having problems with has over 750,000 rows by 26 columns. There isn't a primary key. It stores a transaction dump from another primitive Database server.
Problem:
When perform a query I get one set of results. I run the same query again after a short wait and the rows returned are in a different order. The majority of the rows returned are the same ones returned in the previous query. Only, some rows may be missing and the order may change.
I really wasn't surprised by some duplicate rows. I am confused why they are showing up in a different order and the above mentioned inconsistancy in results.
I thought I was having problems with my Repeater Control; however, SQL Query Analyzer returns the same results.
Question:
What is causing the problem?
Given the following results:
col0 col1 col2
THY 2,265,850 31
VIE 1,474,994 20
RID 1,221,800 17
ACC 1,124,335 15
FEI 445,184 6
DIR 433,783 6
ROM 324,365 4
What is the best way in a query to get the rank of the returned rows by either col1 or col2. In other words who's the number 1,2,3 etc...
total count col0 = 7
total col1 = 7,290,310
total col2 (would eqaul 100%)= 99%
Looking for a mathmatical solution to this any help would be appreciated.
Hi,
I have a problem that I would like help with.
I have to write an SQL Server 2000 stored procedure that returns rows from a table (a SELECT with an ORDER BY). A front end system calls the stored procedure and displays the returned rows. If there is more than one screen's worth of data (ie more than 20 rows returned from the table) then there is a requirement that the stored procedure only returns the rows for the screen ie, for screen 1 I need to return rows 1-20, for screen2 I need to return rows 21-40, screen 3 = rows 41-60.
The screen number will be passed into the stored procedure so I can work out what rows to return, the only problem is how can I tell SQL Server to only select the required rows (ie, say rows 21 to 40 from the returned rows). I can't see any arguments that allow selective rows to be returned (apart from TOP).
Any ideas??
Regards,
Chris
Hello, I have a question on sql stored procedures.
I have such a procedure, which returnes me rows with ID-s.
Then in my asp.net page I make from that Id-s a string like
SELECT * FROM [eai.Documents] WHERE CategoryId=11 OR CategoryId=16 OR CategoryId=18.
My question is: Can I do the same in my stored procedure? (without sending it to page)
Here is it:
set ANSI_NULLS ON
set QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
go
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[eai.GetSubCategoriesById]
(
@Id int
)
AS
declare @path varchar(100);
SELECT @path=Path FROM [eai.FileCategories] WHERE Id = @Id;
SELECT Id, ParentCategoryId, Name, NumActiveAds FROM [eai.FileCategories]
WHERE Path LIKE @Path + '%'
ORDER BY Path
fileCategories table: (for information)Here is the screenshot of the table (10 kb )http://eai.w2o.ru/screen1.gif
Thank you
Artashes
How is the best way to check for No rows returned from a Select statement in a Stored Proc? I have see this:
Code Snippet
Declare @res int
set @res = NULL
Select @res = dbKeyColumn
From aTable
If @res is null
then no rows returned.
Surely there is a better way??
Thanks.
I'm using a simple data flow to extract rows from a table (using a SQL query) and put them in a flat file. If the query returns no rows, I don't want a file to be created. Right now it creates a file with the headers (since I do want the headers if there is data).
Any one know how to do this?
Kevin
In MySQL we use "SELECT (....) LIMIT 0, 10" to only return the first 0 to 10 records. Alternatively we could do "LIMIT 10, 20" to return the 10th to 20th records.
What's the equivilent of this in SQL Server?
Thanks
This should be a simple solution, but it has been a long time since I've done any query writing (mostly in Oracle) and I am stumped, so here goes:
We are in the process of converting Access database to MSSQL with web form front ends.
I have a table, all columns are nullable, and want users to be able to query from a form, which has a field for each column and defaults to a % wild card for the entered value.
I want the users to be able to put any string in any field, and have it return each row that matches that, including rows with null values in the other columns, but not the column with the entered criteria.
Here is a sample of the data:
Code:
SQL> select * from test;
COL1 COL2 COL3 COL4
----- ----- ----- -----
this is a test
this is not test
this is not
this is test too
is test too
is too
is too
7 rows selected.
Now, if I have this SQL run, it will return only rows that have no nulls in any columns:
Code:
select
col1,
col2,
col3,
col4from test
where
col1 like'th%'
and col2 like '%'
and col3 like '%'
and col4 like '%';
COL1 COL2 COL3 COL4
----- ----- ----- -----
this is a test
this is not test
this is test too
Now, if I use an OR clause for each column, this mostly works, but the trouble is it will also return rows with null values for the field that has criteria entered in it:
Code:
select
col1,
col2,
col3,
col4from test
where
(col1 like'th%' OR col1 is null)
and (col2 like '%' OR col2 is null)
and (col3 like '%' OR col3 is null)
and (col4 like '%' OR col4 is null);
COL1 COL2 COL3 COL4
----- ----- ----- -----
this is a test
this is not test
this is not
this is test too
is test too
is too
is too
The idea is to only select the first 4 rows in the above example.
I was playing with ISNULL in the select clause, but all it does is substitute a string for a null, and I think CASE will do the same thing.
Is there a way I can write this query so it will return rows with NULL values in any column, except the one(column) that has user entered criteria in it?
Hi there,
I¡¦ve got a table with the following as well as other info:
User ID
DirectoryTypeID (int)
Region ID (int)
I need to run a query where I could get the region ID, then, in the second column, I¡¦d get all distinct directory types within that region. For example, if I run the query:
subRegionAreaID directoryTypeID
--------------- ---------------
3 1
3 2
3 3
3 9
If need these results to be:
subRegionAreaID directoryTypeID
--------------- ---------------
3 1, 2, 3, 9
Is this possible?
Many Thanks!! ļ
Grazi
Hi,
am trying to do something which I thought would be simple to do in SSIS, several hours am still struggling with it. Not sure if this a bug or a restriction of the product. Or if im hitting some kind of compatability issue because im trying to get to a Oracle database.
Have a sql task which passes in a parameter, I then query my Oracle database and am trying the result (single row) into another variable.
Variable:
Variable Name = Subsystem
Scope= Package
Value = pgc
Data Type = string
SQL:
SELECT SUBSYSTEM_DS AS SUBSYSTEM_DS FROM SYS_SUBSYSTEM WHERE SUBSYSTEM_ID = ?
Have also tried:
SELECT SUBSYSTEM_DS AS SUBSYSTEM_DS FROM SYS_SUBSYSTEM WHERE SUBSYSTEM_ID = ?0
Result Set = Single Row
Parameter Mapping:
VariableName = User:ubsystem
Direction = Input
Data Type=Varchar
Parameter Name= 0
Parameter Size= -1 (have also tried 3 - length of variable)
Oracle Table:
SQL> desc sys_subsystem
Name Null? Type
----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
SUBSYSTEM_ID NOT NULL CHAR(3)
SUBSYSTEM_DS NOT NULL VARCHAR2(40)
....
....
...
The Error:
[Execute SQL Task] Error: An error occurred while assigning a value to variable "SubsystemName": "Single Row result set is specified, but no rows were returned.".
I have another SQL Task that performs an update on this same table and I also pass in the same variable but it works?
SQL:
UPDATE sys_subsystem
SET as_process_fg = 'X'
WHERE subsystem_id = ?0
The parameter mappings are the same as above.
Any assistance here would be much appreciated.
Thanks
Mick
Hello,
I have a seach on UserID enetred in a textbox by user.
When the user types a userID which has no data in the database can I display an error msg instead of the chart and table that is displayed on entering a valid userID.
Thanks,
Kiran.
I have two tables A and B, A has 8000 and B has 8122 records. I want to see what records are missing. I tried EXCEPT and it returned zero rows. I used where non exists also still no records.
View 5 Replies View RelatedIs there a way to extend the number of rows that will be returned so that Reporting services doesn't display such a large number of pages for the users to page through? It would be easier for them to "wheel mouse" through a long page on the screen.
Anyone out there have any thoughts on how this might be accomplished?
Thanks!
Travis
i have a table and a column called req_id, i have it set as the primary key.. so if i just do SELECT * FROM table, shouldnt the rows returned be sorted by the order that the rows were inserted?
this database was improted from an access database.. when i did that in access it would return the rows in sorted order by the order the row was inserted.. but now in MS SQL, its not sorted in that order.. i can't really tell what type of order it's in
I have a query that returns a bunch of rows. I have an sp that takes 3 of the columns in the query as parameters that I want to execute for each row. I can do that easily enough with a cursor, but I thought I'd try to eliminate one more task where I fall back on using cursors.
View 5 Replies View Related