Can some one give me an over view of what I need to do:
Lets say I have a web form with the field: Arrival Date
A web user enters an arrival date of 2/10/06
How do I do a stored procedure that accepts that arrival date and lets me know (by an alert or email) 24 hrs in advance of the arrival date?
Hello guys och dolls.
I have a DTS program in sql-server 2000 which worked to week 27 but not from week 28. During that time I was on vacation och no one else was working with the server.
The part which is the problem looks like this.
if exists (select * from dbo.sysobjects where id = object_id(N'[lenko7].[aviskydd]') and OBJECTPROPERTY(id, N'IsUserTable') = 1)
drop table [lenko7].[aviskydd]
GO
CREATE TABLE [lenko7].[aviskydd] (
[Col002] [varchar] (255) NOT NULL,
[linecount] [int] NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
I have not changed owner.
I don't understand why this DTS package suddenly cant work because it has been working for a several years with no problems. The only thing a know is that we have updated windows 2000 cause of a critical updates Juli 13.
Is there anyone who has the same problem.
Regards Stig Holmlund
I have been successful with DTS packages and various SQL statements. However, I have a new challenge. I have a table in an SQL Server database. One of the columns is employee number and a column for department number(which is not populated) In a remote AS400 file I have the employees number and department number. I want to create a package to connect to remote table and update SQL Server table with department number where the two tables match on the employee number.
View 3 Replies View RelatedThe Server / DB that I am trying to connect to is local.Everything is in place, except I do not know what to put in the "data_source" and "Server.MapPath" fields in the 'form_ac.asp' file.It seems like no matter what I put in there (I have tried several different connection strings), that I always get a '500 Internal Server' error as soon as I 'submit' the form. Its like something else is out of place, because it doesn't even seem to check the DB strings (just based on how quickly the 500 error shows up)
You can see the 'test' form I am working with here: URL...And here is the file the form posts to (form_ac.asp):
Code:
<%
' Declaring variables
Dim first, last, account, email, state, comments, data_source, con, sql_insert
' A Function to check if some field entered by user is empty
Function ChkString(string)
ChkString = Replace( Trim(string) , "'", "''")
End Function
[code]....
The bold is where I am having issues. No matter what connection string I try, I keep getting the 500 error in my browser.I have created the Database in SQL Server Management Studio, and created the table.
Hi,
I'm pretty new to ASP.NET and VB, but I'm working on a project which is essentially a staff directory. Using VS 2005, I've setup a basic grid view which connects to an object which connects via a data layer to a SQL database with Name, Surname, Email, Extension No and Department fields.
I have it working so that if a user enters a name and surname for example, it will return all records with either the name matching or surname matching input parameters. What I want to do is to set up a SQL query which is:
SELECT * FROM records WHERE (Name LIKE @Name) AND (Surname LIKE @Surname) AND (Email LIKE @Email) AND (Dept LIKE @Dept)
so that if the user only enters the first name and surname for example as above, it ONLY returns the record which matches the first name and surname and not all records with either/or. One way I've thought of to do this is to convert the empty fields to "Nothing" so that it fullfils the search parameter for the empty fields. If someone can explain how to do this, or can suggest a better way, I'd be grateful.
Cheers,
Tom
Im trying to determine the best way to store data gathered from a form that a user will fill out online. The form is dynamic and is customized at run time based on group-specific criteria. The end result is a form that might have 3 extra text boxes, 2 extra sets of radio buttons and a freeform textbox, whereas for another group, there might be a slightly different set of input fields. Now comes the issue of storing this data. Since the fields can be somewhat dynamic, it could get tricky to define table columns for each possible input field. So Im considering storing the data as xml. Has anyone else had to build custom forms and ended up storing the data as xml ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHello,
My company Intranet has a form that agents can use to post their comments about the company to upper management, but our customer service department would like to modify the form so that the agent has to pick from a comment type.
The dropdown options on the form will be as follows:
ComplimentsComplaintsGeneral CommentsSuggestions
Each dropdown option has a designated table in a SQL DB.Using postback on the same page, I need to change which fields of the form are visible based upon which dropdown selection the user chooses, and I need the fields to then be inserted into the table that corresponds with the dropdown selection item.
For example: If the Compliments dropdown selection is picked, I need a text box to show for the user's location, the name of the customer, account number, and the message box. Once the submit button is clicked, the characters in these boxes need to be inserted into the Compliments table using its data adapter.
However, if the user selects Suggestions, the name of the customer and the account number should not be visible, since these fields do not exist and when the submit button is pressed, the Suggestions table should be updated.
If you need more information, I will provide whatever is needed.
As always, thanks for everyone's assistance.
Chris
I have a project that consists of a SQL db with an Access front end as the user interface. Here is the structure of the table on which this question is based:
Code Block
create table #IncomeAndExpenseData (
recordID nvarchar(5)NOT NULL,
itemID int NOT NULL,
itemvalue decimal(18, 2) NULL,
monthitemvalue decimal(18, 2) NULL
)
The itemvalue field is where the user enters his/her numbers via Access. There is an IncomeAndExpenseCodes table as well which holds item information, including the itemID and entry unit of measure. Some itemIDs have an entry unit of measure of $/mo, while others are entered in terms of $/yr, others in %/yr.
For itemvalues of itemIDs with entry units of measure that are not $/mo a stored procedure performs calculations which converts them into numbers that has a unit of measure of $/mo and updates IncomeAndExpenseData putting these numbers in the monthitemvalue field. This stored procedure is written to only calculate values for monthitemvalue fields which are null in order to avoid recalculating every single row in the table.
If the user edits the itemvalue field there is a trigger on IncomeAndExpenseData which sets the monthitemvalue to null so the stored procedure recalculates the monthitemvalue for the changed rows. However, it appears this trigger is also setting monthitemvalue to null after the stored procedure updates the IncomeAndExpenseData table with the recalculated monthitemvalues, thus wiping out the answers.
How do I write a trigger that sets the monthitemvalue to null only when the user edits the itemvalue field, not when the stored procedure puts the recalculated monthitemvalue into the IncomeAndExpenseData table?
Hi,
I got a problem.
I installed Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio Express 2005 version.
And I created a Compact database.
I created an connection in SSMSE to connect the database and opened a query form.
then, i run the following sql:
Select * from Table1
It returned 3 records to me.
After that, I used program to insert record into this table.
Then i ran this sql again, it still show me 3 records.
I closed the query form, and re-created a new query form, then run the sql, it returned 4 records to me.
Why? It's very strange and difficult to operate, right?
Is there anyone know how to make the SSMSE to return whole records without any close query form and re-create query form operation?
Thanks a lot!
And Merry X'max!!!
Hi everyone,
What is the main difference between first form normalizations and second form normalization ?
In my opinion, they are both generated for the same operation which is to prevent redundancy(in other words; duplication of data in several records).
So would you please explain it to me ?
Thanks
Hi...
I have data that i am getting through a dbf file. and i am dumping that data to a sql server... and then taking the data from the sql server after scrubing it i put it into the production database.. right my stored procedure handles a single plan only... but now there may be two or more plans together in the same sql server database which i need to scrub and then update that particular plan already exists or inserts if they dont...
this is my sproc...
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[usp_Import_Plan]
@ClientId int,
@UserId int = NULL,
@HistoryId int,
@ShowStatus bit = 0-- Indicates whether status messages should be returned during the import.
AS
SET NOCOUNT ON
DECLARE
@Count int,
@Sproc varchar(50),
@Status varchar(200),
@TotalCount int
SET @Sproc = OBJECT_NAME(@@ProcId)
SET @Status = 'Updating plan information in Plan table.'
UPDATE
Statements..Plan
SET
PlanName = PlanName1,
Description = PlanName2
FROM
Statements..Plan cp
JOIN (
SELECT DISTINCT
PlanId,
PlanName1,
PlanName2
FROM
Census
) c
ON cp.CPlanId = c.PlanId
WHERE
cp.ClientId = @ClientId
AND
(
IsNull(cp.PlanName,'') <> IsNull(c.PlanName1,'')
OR
IsNull(cp.Description,'') <> IsNull(c.PlanName2,'')
)
SET @Count = @@ROWCOUNT
IF @Count > 0
BEGIN
SET @Status = 'Updated ' + Cast(@Count AS varchar(10)) + ' record(s) in ClientPlan.'
END
ELSE
BEGIN
SET @Status = 'No records were updated in Plan.'
END
SET @Status = 'Adding plan information to Plan table.'
INSERT INTO Statements..Plan (
ClientId,
ClientPlanId,
UserId,
PlanName,
Description
)
SELECT DISTINCT
@ClientId,
CPlanId,
@UserId,
PlanName1,
PlanName2
FROM
Census
WHERE
PlanId NOT IN (
SELECT DISTINCT
CPlanId
FROM
Statements..Plan
WHERE
ClientId = @ClientId
AND
ClientPlanId IS NOT NULL
)
SET @Count = @@ROWCOUNT
IF @Count > 0
BEGIN
SET @Status = 'Added ' + Cast(@Count AS varchar(10)) + ' record(s) to Plan.'
END
ELSE
BEGIN
SET @Status = 'No information was added Plan.'
END
SET NOCOUNT OFF
So how do i do multiple inserts and updates using this stored procedure...
Regards
Karen
If I have 5000 rows to update with different values based upon the primary key, is there a better way to do it than 5000 separate update statements?
View 2 Replies View RelatedDoes anyone know what the best way to do mass updates in SQL server is? I am currently using the methodology suggested in this article
http://www.tek-tips.com/faqs.cfm?fid=3141
But the article is assuming that once I update a field it is going to have a value that is NOT NULL. So I can loop through and update the rows that have a NOT NULL value. But my updated rows do contain NULL values, in this case what is the best way to go about this???
***************************************
Here is my code. I want to avoid using Upd_flag becos
after the following code runs I need to reset that flag
before I run my next query
***************************************
--Set rowcount to 50000 to limit number of inserts per batch
Set rowcount 50000
--Declare variable for row count
Declare @rc int
Set @rc=50000
While @rc=50000
Begin
Begin Transaction
--Use tablockx and holdlock to obtain and hold
--an immediate exclusive table lock. This usually
--speeds the insert because only one lock is needed.
update t_PGBA_DTL With (tablockx, holdlock)
SET t_PGBA_DTL.procedur = A.[Proc code],
t_PGBA_DTL.Upd_flag = 1
FROM t_PGBA_DTL
INNER JOIN CPT_HCPCS_I9_PROC_CODES A
ON t_PGBA_DTL.PROC_CD
= A.[Proc code]
WHERE t_PGBA_DTL.Upd_flag = 0
--Get number of rows updated
--Process will continue until less than 50000
Select @rc=@@rowcount
--Commit the transaction
Commit
End
MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE :)
I need to update a table on our Test Server which is GCSQLTEST, with another table thats on our live server GCSQL. How would I go about doing that in a stored procedure??
CREATE PROCEDURE [InsertRevised_MainTable]
AS
INSERT INTO dbo.RevisedMainTable
([IR Number], [Date], [I/RDocument], [Violation Type])
SELECT [Incident Report No], [Date], [I/RDocument], TypeOfIncident
FROM dbo.RevisedMainTable
WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM dbo.RevisedMainTable
WHERE [IR Number] = [IR Number])
Our IT guy insists that he must be present anytime the SQL Server automatic updates from Microsoft are installed on the server or the server will crash. What has he been tinkering with to cause this to happen or is he just giving us a line?
View 8 Replies View RelatedHere's the scenario:
* I have a database with a table
* I have a C# program which displays information about the data in the database
* If the data changes in the database, I wish for the client to pick it up and report the change
Is there a way to have some form of 'Event Handling' where the client will react to UPDATE queries on a table?
My thanks in advance.
I'm developing a web app using ASP.NET and SQL Server 2005 Express. So far it's all been on my local computer, it hasn't gone live yet, so if I need to add a column to a table or make some other schema change I just do it right in Visual Studio, nice and simple. If I have to delete all the old content and start over, no problem. When I deploy it to a staging server I just overwrite the existing file with my new one, losing its data in the process. But soon enough I'll be deploying this to a public web server, there will be real live data in the db, people using it when I need to make updates.
What are some common strategies for updating the schema of a database on a live server?
It's obvious that when I need to update the db I'll have to shut down the site temporarily. But my biggest question is how to keep the existing data from the live db? I obviously can't overwrite it with my local copy. I want to overwrite its schema, without touching its data. How's that done?
Thanks for some advice!
Nate
Is it possible to perform a cascading delete and update using TRIGGERS on a table referenced by a foreign key constraint.?To be more specific.. if the primary key is deleted does the delete trigger on the primary table deletes the record in the foreign key table or does it return an error??
if possible please send us the T SQL Statements .
Thanks in Advance
Geenu
Ajaz Dawre
I'm using MS SQLEXPRESS 2005. Everyting worked fine: I could connect to it from Access and VS 2005. After updates (SQLEXPRESS SP2) I can't connect to it. Error:
Connection failed:
SQLState: 01000
SQL Server error: 2
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]ConnectionOpen(Connect))
Connection failed:
SQLState: `08001
SQL Server error: 17
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][DBNETLIB]SQL Server does not exists or access denied
It applies to SQL SERVER too.
Pls help.
Dear MSDN Support,
Here i am back with an inquiry about the last process of Merge Replication between SQL Mobile 2005 and SQL Server 2005.
Well i have performed all the steps found in the tutorial of the SQL Mobile Edition Books Online, and everything went on so fine and smooth. Now when i deploy my application on the Pocket PC emulator all possible SQL queries work and modify the data only in the emulator, i had installed ActiveSync 4.0 and it synchronizes the SQL Mobile data with the SQL Mobile server only when i copy the database from the emulator to my desktop, and this way is not efficient to my project, i need a better way to synchronize the data between the database on the emulator and that on the SQL Mobile Server.
I'll be looking forward to getting your help as soon as possible.
Thank you for your attention.
Best Regards;
Hello!
We just upgraded to SQL Server 2005 from SQL Server 2000. The DB was backed up using Enterprise Manager and restored with SQL Server Management Studio Express CTP. Everything went as expected (no errors, warnings, or any other indicator of problems).
The DB resides in a DB Server (Server1) and the application we are running is a Client/Server system where the AppServer resides on Server2.
During the application's operation all read, create, and delete transactions work fine but no update works. When viewing details in Trace Log I see this message after attempting any update:
Could not find server 'Server1' in sysservers. Execute sp_addlinkedserver to add the server to sysservers. (7202)
Any help is greatly appreciated,
Lucio Gayosso
HiI have a Platinum database which stores dates in integer form e.g the dateis formatted as below:Column_name Type Length Precision------------------------------ ------------------------------from_date int 4 10Some of the dates in the Platinum database are as follows:729115729359730059730241730302730455How can I bring them into SQL 2000 as valid dates.Thanks for your assistanceSam CJoin Bytes!
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi All,
I'm a relative novice on SQL Server and am a complete beginner at SQL, so am looking for a little help.
I currently use a DTS package to perform inserts / updates to a "production" table.
The DTS package transforms a comma separated file into a "temporary" table that is truncated / cleared before the load starts.
The temporary table has a column denoting Insert or Update. The production table is almost identical, however, doesn't contain the Insert / Update column. The DTS package then, depending upon the Insert / Update flag, either inserts data into the production table or updates data in the production table.
When the DTS package has completed, I'd like to be able to run an SQL Query that validates everything in the "temporary" table is identical to that in the "production" table, which it should be.
I have managed to do some queries to verify that everything has loaded / updated i.e. select primary_key from temporary table where primary_key not in (select * from production table), however, what I haven't been able to do is verify that all the columns on the temporary table match the values in the production table (excluding the Insert / Update flag).
I tried concatenating the columns in each table and comparing the concatenated values, however, this failed due to the different data-types, i.e. decimal, text etc.
Any help will be greatly appreciated.
Many thanks.
Cheers,
David
When one process has one record locked in Update-Mode then an other process can't update any other records on that table with some queries, other queries that access the same records (but with a different WHERE statement) will execute.
This problem occurs with SQL Server 2005, but it didn't with SQL Server 2000 (or any other database).
The problem:
-Process 1 locks a record in the table, and keeps it in Update-Mode, because the user is editing it. (Using OLEDB Pessimistic Cursor-locking)
-Process 2 wants to update an other record, buts gets a "Lock timeout" when using one query but not with another.
For example this query will work :
UPDATE gwseqnumber SET nextseqnr = 3 WHERE row_id = 110;
But this qeury will give me a "Lock timeout" :
UPDATE gwseqnumber SET nextseqnr = 3 WHERE name = 'REC_2';
But it is the same record!!
The record with name = 'REC_2' has the row_id = 110, both values are unique in the table.
The data:
The table [gwseqnumber] has the following CREATE statement:
CREATE TABLE GWSEQNUMBER
(
NEXTSEQNR INTEGER,
NAME CHAR (20),
ADMINISTRATIONCODE INTEGER,
FINDHIGHESTNUMBER CHAR (1),
CLOSEDYN CHAR (1),
ROW_ID INT IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL
);
CREATE INDEX KEY_1 ON GWSEQNUMBER (NEXTSEQNR);
CREATE UNIQUE KEY_2 ON GWSEQNUMBER (ADMINISTRATIONCODE, NAME, IDENTIFIER);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX KEY_3 ON GWSEQNUMBER (ROW_ID);
Both KEY_2 and KEY_3 are unique, KEY_1 is not.
If I remove the index on the NEXTSEQNR column (the index named KEY_1) then both these queries will work, so it is obviously related to the index.
Altough the index is obsolete and can be removed from this table, it should not result in bogus locking errors.
Even when i removed the index not all the queries will work. (With work i mean not run into a locking error, while the record is not even locked.)
Solutions tried:
- Set the compaitiblity level of the databsae back to 80 (for SQL Server 2000 compatibility).
- I have already tried to disable Page-Locking on all the indexes of this table.
So why does the index lock my updates in SQL Server 2005?
And how do i fix it so my database does not run into these locks?
I'm trying to take data from a form and insert it into a SQL database. Everything works fine until I try inserting a number with the comma separator in the number field. The data type in SQL is integer. Are there any special settings to get SQL to accept a comma separated number using ASP?
View 4 Replies View Related
Hi,
I have a Sql Server 2000 and IIS on the same machine,when I try to connect to Sql server through VS 2005
Tools Vizard,the connection succeed.
but,when I try connecting through Code Behind file,it says "Login failed for MyComp2323Administrator".
MyComp2323 is name of my Comp,and I am having only one account ie Administrator on it,without any password.
My connection string is like this :
MyComp2323;Initial Catalog =Test_Employee;Integrated Security = True";
when I connect it through Sql Sever I give Server as "MyComp2323";and the connection succeeds.
Please can anyone tell me where I am going wrong
Thanks,
Ricky
I am basically trying to update a table which reflects account transactions. Accounts get paid in full but occasionally balance payments can be reversed and I want to update the table to show this - I need to show which period the account was previously paid in full.I've created a simplified version of the scenario and below are a couple of examples of things I've tried that do not work. I understand why they do not work but I'm struggling to figure out how to update the 'PeriodPrevPaidInFull' field.
create table Trans
(
AccNo int,
Transaction_Period_Index int,
PeriodOpeningBalance money,
DebtBalance money,
PeriodPaidInFull int NULL,
PeriodPrevPaidInFull int NULL,
[code]...
I am looking to update a record from a previous row. So if there is a value of total goods in week 1, i want that value to carry forward to the value of goods in week 2. Is there any SQL as an example of the best way to accomplish this? I can query it using lag() which works great but i need the source data itself to update as the end-users are accessing the data via lightswitch, so when they save a change, i want the trigger (or whatever you recommend) to update the source table.
View 9 Replies View Relatedhey
I have a notebook with windows vista ultimate edition. For developement i have Ms visual studio 2005 and sql server 2005(with all the required and latest SPs) on it. For the past few months i have been working on the machine without any hitches. Just 2 -3 days back some windows updates got installed on the machine and guess what!!!!!! the sql server service just stopped working. The service wont start no matter what. I
have tried almost solution that i came across on the internet and it wont work out. I unistalled and reinstalled the server as but to no avail. The database engine now wont intall as the sql service wont start during the server installlation.
While browsing through the internet i didnt come across anyone with a similar problem! Am i the first one to be in such a situation
give your comments and share any relevant experience.
P.s the windows upgrades installed on the system were all security upgrades so why should they effect the sql server working.
Rgds
Hello,Can someone point me to getting the total number of inserts and updates on a tableover a period of time?I just want to measure the insert and update activity on the tables.Thanks.- Vish
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm currently running Windows Vista x64 and SQL server 2005 on an HP laptop with a AMD Turion 64 processor. I've install all of the Windows Vista x64 update so far with no issues. However, I'm unable to install SQL server 2005 SP2 via Windows updates.
I was able to successfully download the service pack with no issues and it is currenly on my machine ready to install. The system does take a check prior to the install process beginning to perform the install.
I continuely get and "Error Code A91" when the install process is running. As a result the install does not complete successfully. When I used the "Get Help" option I get a list of possible error conditions but none of them seem be useful. I checked each one and none of them provide any help with a solution.
I've successful installed SP2 on Vista x32 system with no problem. Is this a "Windows Update" issue?
Thanks
I have a SQL Server at version Microsoft SQL Server 2012 - 11.0.5343.0 (X64)
May 4 2015 19:11:32
Copyright (c) Microsoft Corporation
Enterprise Edition (64-bit) on Windows NT 6.3 <X64> (Build 9600: ) (Hypervisor).
I need to apply a cumulative update, either CU2 or CU3 for a third party tool used for monitoring to work. When I try to apply CU2 or any subsequent CU there is nothing that need the update so I cannot advance the version to 11.00.5548.
Hi, i have created a mini form to test out easy steps and my sql
connection but something is wrong with my connection i think...
I am running windows XP Pro SP 2. i have Microsoft VisStudio .NET 2003
fully installed and now im installing SQL Server 2000 Developrs
Edition. I just cimpleted the installaion and picked some settings:
Local Computer Installation, Create new Instance since this is the
first time i use it, Server and Client Tools, and chose a Local rather
the Domain option aferwards. (i have used this version before but had
to format the comp so now reinstalling everything).
My problem is this, i basically started the server and it on online. i
went to the "enterprise manager" and in the "Microsoft SQL Servers
-> SQWL Server Group -> (Local)(Windows NT)-> Databases, i
created a new database called tables and added a single table just to
begin testing to see if at least its functional. i was able to do this
so far.
Now i started my .NET, and wrote a tiny program to see if the
connection to the SQL database would open, but it didnt. It always
failed. i am programming an ASP.NET WebApplication. I cant open the
connection to my database. i dont know why. (The tiny piece of code i
wrote is at the bottom in case you know c#). There is a note also
under the code for the ones who will read through its simlicity
any help or walk through would be appreciated. thank u...
Sam
CODE:
using System;
using System.Collections;
using System.ComponentModel;
using System.Data;
using System.Drawing;
using System.Web;
using System.Web.SessionState;
using System.Web.UI;
using System.Web.UI.WebControls;
using System.Web.UI.HtmlControls;
using System.Data.SqlClient;
using System.Configuration;
namespace WebTest1
{
/// <summary>
/// Summary description for WebForm1.
/// </summary>
public class WebForm1 : System.Web.UI.Page
{
string connection = ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings["ConnectionString"];
protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox TextBox1;
protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label Label1;
protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox TextBox2;
protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label Label2;
protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.TextBox TextBox3;
protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button Button1;
protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label Label5;
protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label outputBox;
protected System.Web.UI.WebControls.Label Label3;
private void Page_Load(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
// Put user code to initialize the page here
}
#region Web Form Designer generated code
override protected void OnInit(EventArgs e)
{
//
// CODEGEN: This call is required by the ASP.NET Web Form Designer.
//
InitializeComponent();
base.OnInit(e);
}
/// <summary>
/// Required method for Designer support - do not modify
/// the contents of this method with the code editor.
/// </summary>
private void InitializeComponent()
{
this.Button1.Click += new System.EventHandler(this.Button1_Click);
this.Load += new System.EventHandler(this.Page_Load);
}
#endregion
private void Button1_Click(object sender, System.EventArgs e)
{
outputBox.Text = "Button has been clicked";
SqlConnection conn = new SqlConnection(connection);
outputBox.Text += "----------------Creating sql Connection";
try
{
conn.Open();
outputBox.Text += "---------------opening the Connection";
}
catch(Exception p)
{
outputBox.Text += "--------------failed to open Connection";
Console.WriteLine(p.ToString());
}
outputBox.Text += "-------------Success Connection and Login to Server!";
}
}
}
NOTE: i always get this output :
Button has been clicked----------------Creating sql
Connection--------------failed to open Connection-------------Success
Connection and Login to Server!
it skips the try block's print line which means it didnt work......
string connection =
ConfigurationSettings.AppSettings["ConnectionString"]; this one i
updated in my Web.config and included application setting line that
loox like this
<add key="ConnectionString" value="Data Source=127.0.0.1; Initial Catalog=login; User Id=sa; password=pass" />