Insert Should Aquire Only Exclusive Rowlock. Why Does Insert Block Select With ( Updlock, Rowlock )?
Mar 12, 2007
Here is the situation i am stuck with, see the example first and below explained the problem:
-- 'SESSION A
create table foo (
id integer,
pid integer,
data varchar(10)
);
begin transaction
insert into foo values ( 1, 1, 'foo' )
insert into foo values ( 2, 1, 'bar' )
insert into foo values ( 3, 1, 'bozo' )
insert into foo values ( 4, 2, 'snafu' )
insert into foo values ( 5, 2, 'rimrom' )
insert into foo values ( 6, 2, 'blark' )
insert into foo values ( 7, 3, 'smeg' )
commit transaction
create index foo_id_idx on foo ( id )
create index foo_pid_idx on foo ( pid )
begin transaction
insert into foo values ( 9, 3, 'blamo' )
-- 'SESSION B
begin transaction
select id, data from foo with ( updlock, rowlock ) where id = 5;
-- Problem:
-- Uncommitted transaction in session A, with insert into table FOO, aquires lock on index foo_pid_idx which BLOCKS select with ( updlock, rowlock ) in session B.
-- Insert should aquire only exclusive rowlock. Why does insert block select with ( updlock, rowlock )?
Appreciate your help,
Rajesh.
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Dec 3, 2007
I've got a SELECT WITH (UPDLOCK, ROWLOCK) WHERE followed by an UPDATE WHERE statement. The results of the SELECT statement are deserialized in C# and updates are made to the deserialized object. Then the object is serialized back into the table with the UPDATE statement. I've got this code running within a transaction scope with the ReadCommited isolation level.
My service receives requests to update data and the requests can come in on different threads. What I'm seeing, is that once in a while, the log messages from my application indicate that two different threads are able to issue the above SELECT statement and both are receiving results. This is a problem since the thread that issues the last UPDATE will overwrite the changes made by the first. Each thread has its own connection and transaction scope.
I've researched all over the place and have tried a few different things, but all things point to the fact that query hints are just hints and that SQL may or may not pay attention to them. If that's the case, how am I suppose to perform a SELECT with the intention of updating so that no one else can do the same? I haven't tried table level locking, but I'd really like to avoid that if possible.
-Mike
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 18, 2001
Hello,
Is there any way to specify the sql server to use row level locking in transaction.
Thanks
Val
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2008
Advantage and disadvantage of using rowlock in sql server 2005.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 26, 2007
Him
I am trying to issue the following statement to lock a record with inner join but I have an error:-
SELECT amaster.acctno,bmaster.balance,bmaster.YEAR
FROM amaster [ROWLOCK] with (Xlock)
INNER JOIN bmaster
ON amaster.acctno = bmaster.acctno
WHERE (bmaster.YEAR = 2007) acctno = 10000100
ORDER BY amaster.acctno
The error:
Msg 4104, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
The multi-part identifier "amaster.acctno" could not be bound.
Thanks
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hello,I need to lock only one row with exclusive lock (nobody else can see ormodify this row), but when I use "with (xlock, rowlock)" it doesn't work.XLOCK always locks whole table.Can anybody help me?Thanks in advance.Magda
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 8, 2008
Hi,Sql-Server 2000, 2005.A report fetches a lot of rows using the "WITH (ROWLOCK)" syntax (thesql is generated on the fly by a tool and not easily changeable).SELECT col1, col2 FROM mytab WITH (ROWLOCK) WHERE ...."The select-clause runs for several minutes.Another user fetches one of those rows and tries to update it. Theresult is a lock timeout.I suppose that the long running select-clause has put a shared lock onthe rows and the updater (exclusive-lock) will have to wait for thelong-running select and so the lock timeout is expiring.Are all those rows "shared locked" until all are fetched?Would there be any change if the "WITH (ROWLOCK)" is removed, isn'talthough "shared lock" the default behaviour?The "WITH (NOLOCK)" would probably help?What about the definition of optimistic concurrency, shouldn't allselect-clauses contain "WITH (NOLOCK)" to allow an optimisticconcurrency scenario?Regards Roger.PS. Probably some misunderstanding from me here, but this should bethe right place to get it right.
View 8 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2008
Hello all.
I'm a litle confused about what's best to use, either isolation levels or locking per table.
Cause there are some queries in the stored procedures where I don't need locking i.e. when I check the status of client, but other queries where I do need locking like when I check the existence of a product.
What's best to use, can I combine both? Could you explain it thecnically?
lots of thanks in advance
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2007
Reading about avoiding deadlocks in SQL, I have found different opnions about whether using or not NOLOCK/ROWLOCK hints on SELECT/UPDATE/DELETE statements. I have several applications executing transactions on the same databases and tables, including inserts, updates and deletes. I wonder if by using NOLOCK/ROWLOCK I could decrease the chances of having deadlocks. At least using ROWLOCK on my update statements?. I just need some advice here.
Regards.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 10, 2015
I have a stored procedure that updates a table. I also have an UDF that allows dirty reads (nolock).
What's the precedence level in SQL server? If I add xlock,rowlock to the update statement, will the dirty read wait for the update transaction to commit, or will it perform a dirty read regardless of the locking scheme in the update statement?
View 0 Replies
View Related
Jun 7, 2007
I have a SSIS package that is run from one job, nowhere else. The package has TransactionOption NotSupported.
In the SSIS package I first have a sequence container that has TransactionOption Required (Serializable). The sequence container contains several Execute SQL tasks that access the same SQL Server 2005 database. The Execute SQL tasks have TransactionOption supported / Serializable. The first SQL statement is:
select p.column_name
from table_name p with (XLOCK, ROWLOCK)
where p.second_column_name = 'COLUMN_VALUE'
After this there are a couple of SQL tasks, and finally a task containing the following SQL:
select p.third_column_name
from table_name p
where p.second_colomn_name = 'COLUNM_NAME'
The idea is that the first query exclusively locks the row in the table_name-table for mutual exclusion purposes, i.e. so that if for some reason the SSIS package would be executed simultaneously two or more times, only one package execution could lock the row and proceed and the other executions will have to wait. There's an index on column second_column_name in the table to avoid the select locking other rows in addition to the required row.
Some questions:
1) Is it so in my setup that when SSIS runtime executes the sequence container it creates a transaction in the beginning of the sequence container and commits the transaction in the end of the sequence container? And in my setup the Execute SQL tasks in the sequence containar are executed under the same transaction?
2) I have a problem that the second query sometimes gives this error:"ErrorCode: -1073548784. ErrorDescription: Executing the query "XXXXX" failed with the following error: "Transaction (Process ID 73) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.". Possible failure reasons: Problems with the query, "ResultSet" property not set correctly, parameters not set correctly, or connection not established correctly."
The 1st query has locked the row for the transaction. How can the second query be deadlocked, shouldn't the transaction have a lock on the row? I'd understand if the 1st query failed sometimes, but don't understand how the 2nd quey can fail.
r,
JM
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2006
Hi all,
here my question :
I have 2 applications.
connection 1.
one does select max(grp) from orv and one does select max(grp) from orh. orh is the historical file from orv. We did this to know which is the greather grp between these 2 files.
After having did this, we add 1 at grp field.
we insert into orv the record max(grp) + 1
connection 2.
an other application could insert at the same time record in this table orv with same parameters.
my problem is the following. I need to block record in orv table either on the select ( connection 1) or Insert ( connection 2) to avoid having select max(grp) + 1 on orv at connection 1 and Insert a record into orv at connection 2.
I believe I need to use HOLDLOCK, UPDLOCK.
but I have not the habitude to use them.
Can I do this ?
connection 1
select max(grp) from orv WITH HOLDLOCK
connection 2
what should I use to avoid lock when I need to insert into orv. ?
thanks for your quick answer
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 10, 2007
Hello All!
I want to perform 4 or 5 statements as a transaction but I need to make sure that during this complete transaction no one else inserts or deletes records from a table named SomeTable.
So how can I lock MyTable at the beggining of the transaction so that during my transaction no one else can insert or delete anything in table SomeTable?
Thanks!
David
View 9 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2008
Hi, I've got three tables that I'm trying to pull data from. The first is a family of rings, the second is the individual rings and the third relates one ring to another:
RingFamilies
------------------------------------
FamilyID pk | FamName
------------------------------------
Rings
-------------------------------------------
RingID | FamilyID fk | RingName
-------------------------------------------
RingAssociations
-----------------------------------------
RingID1 pk/fk | RingID2 pk/fk
-----------------------------------------
I'm trying to pull a list of RingIDs and names for a given FamilyID. To complicate it, I want to exclude rings that are already associated to a given RingID, i.e. I only want the unassociated rings in a given family. To complicate it even a little more then name needs to be the FamName+RingName...is this possible? Thanks!
Given @FamID and @RingID
Result Table
------------------------------------------------
RingID | FamName + RingName
------------------------------------------------
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I want to add the content of a table into anotherI tried to copy all fields, except the primary key:INSERT INTO table2(field2, field3, field4, ...)SELECT field2, field3, field4, ...FROM anotherDB.dbo.table1gives the following error:Violation of UNIQUE KEY constraint...Cannot insert duplicate key...Why?I didn't ask him to copy the key column; Isn't the SQL Server supposedto know how to increment the key ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2008
hi need help how to do this
INSERT INTO SELECT FROM table + add one row for evry employee (on insert)
this is table tb_test1
empid fname unit fld1 fld2 fld3 fld4 fld5
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
111 aaa 1 a b c d d
222 bbb 3 a c e g g
333 cccc 5 s h t u j
Code Snippet
INSERT INTO [nili].[dbo].[tb_test2]
([empid]
,[fname]
,[unit]
,[fld1]
,[fld2]
,[fld4]
,[fld5])
SELECT [empid]
,[fname]
,[unit]
,[fld1]
,[fld2]
,[fld4]
,[fld5]
FROM [nili].[dbo].[tb_test1]
i need to insert into tb_test2
and ADD one row for evry employee
val_orginal=1 (the orginal ROW)
val_orginal=2 (the extra ROW)
this is table tb_test2
after the insert
HOW TO THIS
empid fname unit fld1 fld2 fld3 fld4 fld5 val_orginal
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
111 aaa 1 a b c d d 1
111 aaa 1 - - - - - 2
222 bbb 3 a c e g g 1
222 bbb 3 - - - - - 2
333 cccc 5 s h t u j 1
333 cccc 5 - - - - - 2
and tnx for the help
View 12 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2008
hello friends
my one insert code lines is below :) what does int32 mean ? AND WHAT IS DIFFERENT BETWEEN ONE CODE LINES AND SECOND CODE LINES :)Dim conn As New SqlConnection(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings("ConnectionString").ConnectionString)
Dim cmd As New SqlCommand("Insert into table1 (UserId) VALUES (@UserId)", conn)
'you should use sproc instead
cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@UserId", textbox1.text)
'your value
Try
conn.Open()Dim rows As Int32 = cmd.ExecuteNonQuery()
conn.Close()Trace.Write(String.Format("You have {0} rows inserted successfully!", rows.ToString()))
Catch sex As SqlExceptionThrow sex
Finally
If conn.State <> Data.ConnectionState.Closed Then
conn.Close()
End If
End Try
MY SECOND INSERT CODE LINES IS BELOWDim SglDataSource2, yeni As New SqlDataSource()
SglDataSource2.ConnectionString = ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings("ConnectionString").ToString
SglDataSource2.InsertCommandType = SqlDataSourceCommandType.Text
SglDataSource2.InsertCommand = "INSERT INTO urunlistesi2 (kategori1) VALUES (@kategori1)"
SglDataSource2.InsertParameters.Add("kategori1", kategoril1.Text)Dim rowsaffected As Integer = 0
Try
rowsaffected = SglDataSource2.Insert()Catch ex As Exception
Server.Transfer("yardim.aspx")
Finally
SglDataSource2 = Nothing
End Try
If rowsaffected <> 1 ThenServer.Transfer("yardim.aspx")
ElseServer.Transfer("urunsat.aspx")
End If
cheers
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2000
Anybody know how a SELECT statement can generate an exclusive lock on a table ?
I always thought that SELECT's take out shared locks. Is this something to do with temporary tables generated by ORDER BY's and DISTINCT ?
Rogue SQL below (from Site Server).
SELECT A.i_Dsid, A.i_Aid, A.vc_Val, A.i_Val, A.dt_Val, A.img_Val FROM Object_Attributes A, ( SELECT DISTINCT L.i_Dsid FROM Object_Lookup L , Object_Attributes OA2 (index = IND_vc_Aid) WHERE ((( L.i_ObjectClass = 9999 )) AND ( OA2.vc_Val LIKE ( '999999999.9999999%' ) AND OA2.i_Aid = 99)) AND (L.i_Container_Dsid = 99) AND ( OA2.i_Dsid = L.i_Dsid )) AS B WHERE B.i_Dsid = A.i_Dsid AND A.i_Aid NOT IN( 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ) ORDER BY A.i_Dsid, A.i_Aid
Can anybody suggest a workaround ? Thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2008
Hi ,
I have some issues with deadlock.I am getting deadlock becuase of two
select on same table. The sql server log is like this ,
Select statements should have always shared lock.I am not getting why
its doing exclusive lock and creating deadlock.
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Deadlock encountered €¦. Printing
deadlock information
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Wait-for graph
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Log Viewer could not read information
for this log entry. Cause: Data is Null. This method or property
cannot be called on Null values.. Content:
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Node:1
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown KEY: 9:72057594050117632 (8d036f07c58f)
CleanCnt:3 Mode Flags: 0×0
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Grant List 3:
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Owner:0×12E9F160 Mode: S Flg:0×0 Ref:1
Life:00000001 SPID:68 ECID:0 XactLockInfo: 0×353D1C54
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown SPID: 68 ECID: 0 Statement Type: SELECT
Line #: 4
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Input Buf: Language Event: (@actDefId
nvarchar(36)@stateList varchar(1)@stateList1 varchar(1)@procRelObjType
smallint@procRelObjIdList varchar(36))
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Requested By:
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown ResType:LockOwner Stype:€™OR€™Xdes:
0×2FBB67F0 Mode: X SPID:112 BatchID:0 ECID:0 TaskProxy0×0792E378)
Value:0×38baa20 Cost0/11888)
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Log Viewer could not read information
for this log entry. Cause: Data is Null. This method or property
cannot be called on Null values.. Content:
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Node:2
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown KEY: 9:72057594049986560 (6f02e1cd37c3)
CleanCnt:3 Mode:X Flags: 0×0
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Wait List:
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Owner:0×12396EE0 Mode: S Flg:0×2 Ref:1
Life:00000000 SPID:90 ECID:0 XactLockInfo: 0×0AA8178C
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown SPID: 90 ECID: 0 Statement Type: SELECT
Line #: 4
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Input Buf: Language Event: (@actDefId
nvarchar(36)@stateList varchar(1)@stateList1 varchar(1)@procRelObjType
smallint@procRelObjIdList varchar(36))
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Requested By:
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown ResType:LockOwner Stype:€™OR€™Xdes:
0×353D1C30 Mode: S SPID:68 BatchID:0 ECID:0 TaskProxy0×13B3E378)
Value:0×12e9e780 Cost0/6164)
5/6/2008 12:38 spid4s Unknown Log Viewer could not read information
for this log entry. Cause: Data is Null. This method or property
cannot be called on Null values.. Content:
If you have any idea regarding this please let me know ASAP.
Thanks in advance .
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2006
I'm doing a INSERT...SELECT where I'm dependent on the records SELECT:ed to be in a certain order. This order is enforced through a clustered index on that table - I can see that they are in the proper order by doing just the SELECT part.
However, when I do the INSERT, it doesn't work (nothing is inserted) - can the order of the records from the SELECT part be changed internally on their way to the INSERT part, so to speak?
Actually - it is a view that I'm inserting into, and there's an instead-of-insert trigger on it that does the actual insertions into the base table. I've added a "PRINT" statement to the trigger code and there's just ONE record printed (there should be millions).
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 7, 2006
Hallo, I am trying to insert into a table HFacility a FacilityID, HotelID FROM Facility. Using Select.Both HFacility and Facility have columns FacilityID, HotelID with same DataType.Insert INTO HFacility
Select FacilityID, HotelID
FROM FacilityI am getting this error:Server: Msg 213, Level 16, State 4, Line 1Insert Error: Column name or number of supplied values does not match table definition.Thank you for your help
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 28, 2007
Hi guys,I need help with my query for my web application. The situation is, once i select an item in the dropdownlist and click generate, it will populate the gridview with the query results. Now, what i wanted to do is get all the Document Owner ID results and save it into another table. How will i able to get all the Document ID result and store it in another table? Thanks in advance.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 5, 2001
Hello all,
I'm trying to copy the contence from one table to another with the following statement:
insert tmembers
select cardno,voornaam,achternaam,straat,nummer,toevoegin g, postcode,woonplaats,regio,land,geboortedatum,gesla cht,leeftijd,telefoon,mobiel,homepage,email,id_bew ijs,id_nummer,uitgiftedatum,expiratiedatum,delict, hobbies,soort_bezoeker,muziek_voorkeur,mailing,ema il_lijst,reactie,notitie,haarkleur,oogkleur,kenmer ken,fingerprint,faceprint,cam_pos from members
I get the following error on execution
Server: Msg 8152, Level 16, State 9, Line 1 String or binary data would be truncated. The statement has been terminated.
Can anyone tell me what this means or suggest a better way on how to copy the contence between two tables.
Kind regards,
Rob
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 29, 2000
Hi,
Does anybody know how to query a table to get the distinct rows, and insert
these rows into another table in another database
Thanks in advance
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2000
Which is more efficient SELECT INTO or INSERT INTO?
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 15, 1999
I am attempting to use a SQL statement that I shameless stole from "Using Microsoft SQL Server 6.5 Second Edition" and am failing miserably. I want to use the statement
INSERT INTO CallEntries
(CallNum, Entry)
VALUES (SELECT CallNum, Notes
FROM CallsJunk)
and am getting 2 errors. The first is a syntax error near the keyword 'SELECT', and the second is a syntax error near ')'
These are both tables in the same database. Anyone know what I'm screwing up here?
The example I was given is
Insert into addresses
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2002
what's the difference between SELECT INTO and INSERT INTO.
because when I insert value into a temp table using this two function, Select into runa 3 times faster compare to insert into.
does anyone know what's the reason for this.
Thank You,
John
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2007
Hi,
I'm trying to use a select statement to retrieve a value and then use this value in an insert. I've written the entire code inside a stored proc. Darn thing refuses to work. Please help
Here is a call to this stored proc
Set_NewUserName 'mm', 'mm', 'student', 'email@em.com', 'mm', 'mm', 'mm', 'add1', 'add2', '600041', 'hybad', '93805', 'city', 'chennai', '13/10/1972', '6'
the code above sends third param 'student' to retrieve UserType_ID from tblUserType table. Also the last parameter is Class ID in the insert statement, for which I am passing the class value which will in turn retrieve the class ID from the tblClass table.
STORED PROCEDURE CODE BELOW HERE
set ANSI_NULLS ON
set QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[Set_NewUserName]
-- Following parameters will be sent to this proc by a webpage
-- We need to use the value in UserType_Name to identify if this is a
-- teacher or a student and insert into tblUser the appropriate value
-- similarly for class Id, retrive from class table using the value user
-- selects from drop down
@Login_IDnvarchar(20),@Password nvarchar(30),@UserType_Name nvarchar(30),
@Email nvarchar(30),@FirstName nvarchar(10),@LastName nvarchar(10),
@FullName nvarchar(20),
@add1 nvarchar(10),@add2 nvarchar(10),@pin nvarchar(10),
@city nvarchar(10),@phone nvarchar(10),@HintQuestion nvarchar(MAX),
@HintAnswer nvarchar(50),@DOB nvarchar(10),@Class_Name nvarchar(10)
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
Declare @Class_IDuniqueidentifier
Declare @UserType_IDuniqueidentifier
-- retrieve the class id first from the tblClass Table
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL REPEATABLE READ
BEGIN TRANSACTION
IF NOT EXISTS
(select Class_ID from tblClass where Class_Name = @Class_Name)
RAISERROR('select Class_ID from tblClass where Class_Name',11,1)
BEGIN
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RAISERROR('You must provide a valid Class ID',11,1)
END
-- retrieve the usertype id first from the UserType Table
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL REPEATABLE READ
BEGIN TRANSACTION
IF NOT EXISTS
(select UserType_ID from tblUserType where UserType_Name = 'student')
RAISERROR('select UserType_ID from tblUserType where UserType_Name',11,1)
BEGIN
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RAISERROR('You must provide a valid Status ID',11,1)
RETURN
END
-- At last the Insert statements for the procedure
-- is created below here
insert into tblUser
values (
newid(),
@Login_ID,@Password,
@UserType_ID,
@Email,
@FirstName, @LastName, @FullName,
@add1, @add2,@pin, @city,
@phone,
'True',
@HintQuestion,@HintAnswer,
@DOB,
@Class_ID
)
END
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 4, 2005
can somebody tell me the difference between select into and insert into statements in sql server.
for example: How
SELECT LastName,FirstName INTO Student_bk FROM Student
is different from
INSERT INTO Student_bk(LastName,FirstName) Select (LastName,FirstName) from Student
Thanks.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 19, 2004
I'm a beginner and I've been searching most of the day for the right syntax.
Table UserData has 3 fields
UserID TypeID SomeNullField
I want to insert into TypeID the value 207 if it doesn't already exits.
=============================================
I thought this would work, but doesn't
INSERT INTO UserData
(TypeID)
VALUES ( 207)
SELECT UserID
FROM UserData
WHERE (NOT exists(SELECT FROM UserData WHERE UserData.TypeID = 207));
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Am I even close???? Like I said I am new at this game. Appreciate any help anyone can reach down and lend.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2007
Quick question....
I have an insert into query that uses a select to get the valuse form other tbls. however on of the column in the tbl i am inseting into requers a values so i can not just leave it out. however I cant get that value for another tbl ither so long and short of it I need to know how to us the insert into with the select and also beable to set that odd column to 0.
This is what I have so far:
Code:
INSERT INTO CheckDetail(FK,Leaseid,BU,LOC,DuplicateVerification)
Select distinct t1.ID, t2.site_id,t3.CompanyCode,t3.CostCenter
From PMTK_tbl as t1, Leaseinfo as t2
left join CostCenters as t3
on t2.market = t3.market and t2.market_region = t3.RegionCode
where t2.site_id = '9SA0998A'
order by t1.ID ASC
The DuplicationVerification needs to be set to 0.. How do I do that
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 7, 2006
I dont know why this code is not working (for MS SQL 2000)DECLARE @Name nVarChar@Name = SELECT DISTINCT Users.Name FROM Users ORDER BY Users.NameINSERT INTO Local(Numb, Name, Level) VALUES (0, @Name , 1)I want to insert into the table Local all the Distinct Names from Usersthe datatype of name :[Name] [nvarchar] (100) NOT NULL UNIQUE NONCLUSTEREDif the name allready exists in the table Localisation I must jump over the error how can i do it ?thank you
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jan 14, 2007
Hi
for MS SQL 2000
how can I do ? :
INSERT INTO [Users] (Numb, Name, Level) VALUES
(
2,
(SELECT DISTINCT Names FROM Others) ,
3
)
Users has an autoIncrement ID = Users_id
thank you for helping
View 2 Replies
View Related