Instance Naming Problems
Jun 16, 2006
When I try to Add New Item - Database in VS C# Express, I get "An error has occurred while establishing a conncection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 25 - Connection string is not valid)"
When I open the management studio, I can connect to a database named Dev, and when I try to "Browse for more" from the server selector combobox, it is the only one found. I believe "Dev" was my old MSDE name, although this is also what my "Computer Name" is set to. Unfortunetly the setup of SQL Express didn't ask me what to name my instance.
I thought maybe the SQL Server 2005 Express Toolkit installation didn't actually contain the server software, and only installed the tools, as during the installation the section where I select components only listed things like client tools and what not, with not mention of the server software.
So I thought maybe it didn't install the server, so I downloaded the server installation that is by itself, and installed it, this time I saw the check for hide advanced options, so I went through the advanced options this time. I've have been through this same setup before at work, and both times it has confused me. It seems very different from installing previous versions of SQL server.
Where I choose to create a new instance or upgrade, I choose to upgade, and it is not clear what I'm upgrading, the selector does not display instance names.
At another point it asks me about configuring it to use the Local service, local system, or network account. The documentation of how these differ is vauge. For example, the network account is described basically as "don't use this" without saying what it is.
I was accustomed to just a local account, and network account settings from previous versions, and network was always the logical choice for me to use intergrated security. I don't understand what the new catagories represent and what will be functionally different in the way I connect.
So I'm really confused, and getting back to the instance names. In the surface area configuration as well as the VS Express, it only sees the name as MSSQLSERVER
For example if I "add new connection" from database explorer and click advanced, the datasource drop down lists only ".MSSQLSERVER"
So I'm thoroughly confused at this point and not sure what to do.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 3, 2007
Hi all
SQL Server 2005 cluster. Active-Active. We want to create two instances. The two nodes are named:
mike-940-01
mike-940-02
I read somewhere that there can only be ONE default instance in a 2005 cluster. So I interpret that as meaning that I can only have one instance named after a virtual server (example: mike-940-03) and the other instance has to be a slashed instance (example: mike-940-03/instance1). But what if I create another virtual server (example: mike-940-04). Can I install a default instance in that server? Can someone help me clarify this?
Also, if I'm using all slashed instance names, then what does it choose as the base name before the slash? In other words, what decides which virtual server name is used? Is it the management node? Is it one of the nodes?
My objective is to keep consistency in the naming on the cluster. If I have to use slashed instances, then I want all sql server instances to have a slash.
Sorry about the confusing explanation, but that's probably a symptom of MY confusion.
Thanks!
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 25, 2005
I'm new to SQL Server and just installed VS 2005 and SQL Server 2005 Express. My question is, is there any naming rules for an instance? When I open Express Manager it is asking me to enter an Instance name. Thanks for any suggestions or help,
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2007
Hello,
I install Cluster naming instance of MSSQL 2005 Enterprise edition with SP2 and latest patch.
When I try connecting this instance from outside of the server by "server nameinstance name" I got connection error.
But when I connecting by "server name,port number" it's connecting with no problem.
Can someone help me resolve connection outside of the server with "server nameinstance name"?
Thanks
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 28, 2007
Hello, I have 2 tables: Articles and Users. These 2 tables are related by AuthorId (FK) in Articles and UserId (PK) in Users. My question is: should the use the same name for the 2 keys, i.e., UserId? Or it is normal to use AuthorId in Articles table and UserId in Users table. This makes more sense. Just a naming question. Thanks, Miguel
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 22, 2015
I've two instances(Default, Named[dynamicsFINANCE]) running on SQL server 2014. However, when I try to connect to named instance say (dynamicsFINANCE) using SQL authentication from local SSMS, I get below error message:
A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 26 - Error Locating Server/Instance Specified) (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: -1)
I assigned a static port number to the named instance [dynamicsFINANCE] 1450. I also setup the firewall rule to allow access to Port 1450.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2006
Hi fellows,
I have to migrate all objects alogwith all constraints,SP,Triggers, indexes etc from Development instance to Production instance of a DB, all those things are created through wizard ie. Sql server 2000 Enterprise Manager. if i use DTS it only mirates data along with tables and views but constraints,SP,Triggers, indexes etc not yet copied.
can any body help me how can I solve this problem by copying all objects alogwith all constraints,SP,Triggers etc from Development instance to Production instance.
This is Sql server 2000 Cluster environment.
thanks in advance for any help
rahman
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2014
I have a 3 node cluster on which I have installed SSAS as it's own insntance. I have created this as a named instance and can connect to it by serverinstance if I'm on the server itself. However from my desktop I get the error saying instance was not found on server name.
I have defined an alternate port and setup firewall rules and can connect via server:port but not serverinstance. Prior to making this change SSAS was running on default port of 2383 and I could connect just by servername.
I have read many articles for previous versions saying that clustered SSAS will always use 2383 and that you must connect just using servername. However and this is were it gets strange. I have a 2 node UAT cluster with SSAS setup exactly the same way I've described above and I can connect from my desktop as serverinstance.
Should I be able to connect as serverinstances for a named clustered instance in 2012 ?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2007
Hi, I have a task in hand to migrate (upgrade) from SQL2K named instance to SQL2K5 default instance. There are many intranet applications touching current SQL2K. I would like to perform this upgrade such that I don't have to touch any application code - meaning I don't have to change the connectionstring to point to new Default instance. How can I achieve this?
So, in otherwords, here is what I want to achieve:
Current Server: SQL2K: SERVER_AINSTANCE_A (named instance)
Upgraded Server: SQL2K5: SERVERB (default instance)
If I have both default, I could achive this by setting up DNS alias after migration done so that any call for SERVER_A would point to SERVER_B. But in my case, I don't have SERVER_A, I have named instance. Is there any solution?
Regards,
Vipul
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 18, 2006
What does everyone think of this method?I have a ton of tables like User, Project etc. I use the SAME column names for each table. For an example, ID, Name, Status etc instead of UserID etc.Only for relationship naming will I use UserID.The reason I do this is from a OOP perspective.My dad often said that a table was a entitiy of an object and each record in the table was a instance of that object.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2005
I have a function which is named like this:
CREATE FUNCTION [GEEKASPNET.Split]
How can I use it in my stored procedure:
UPDATE Tasks SET Status = 0
WHERE TaskID IN (SELECT CONVERT(int, Value) FROM [GEEKASPNET].Split(@Tasks,","))
This does not work and gives me that "unreconized function GeekASPNET.Split
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 2, 2001
I am using SQL Server 7 w/ SP2. This may seem silly, but I'm trying to re-name a DTS local package -- so far without success. Surely there's a way to do this. Also, where is DTS info stored? That is, how does SQL Server store package names and other details? Thanks!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2000
Does anyone know if there is someway to rename a DTS package? Or can I go into the msdb database
and delete the old name?
Thanks for your help.
Dianne
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2005
Most of the programming I do is in Access. I like to use naming conventions for all my tables, queries, etc. I am now moving several databases to SQL Server. Does anyone know of a good resource for naming convetions in SQL Server. Website, book?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2006
Hi all,
I wanted to ask for the naming conventions in SQL SERVER.as in case of pl/sql server we have ..name_of_package.name_of_procedure thats how we call the procedures i.e. owner of schema then name of package n then procedure name.....i want to ask you all how is it done in SQL SERVER..please try to reply as soon as possible,
i will b waiting for the replies,
regards
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 8, 2006
In our database tables are generated like
EMP_MASTER
DEPT_MASTER
like that. when we generate classes from database the class names are looking like
EmpMaster
DeptMaster
but for my classes that Master suffix is not required.
please solve my problem.
Thanks and Regards,
guru
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2006
Would like to know what naming convention you folks use.
What I need specifically is column naming conventions.
For instance, I have a table called 'lst_as400_srvr'. We could go with the vigorous:
CREATE TABLE lst_as400_srvr
(
as400_srvr_idintNOT NULLIDENTITY,
as400_srvr_namevarchar(128)NOT NULL,
as400_srvr_is_activebitNOT NULLDEFAULT 1
)
Or, I could loosen the rules a bit and go with:
CREATE TABLE lst_as400_srvr
(
idintNOT NULLIDENTITY,
namevarchar(128)NOT NULL,
is_activebitNOT NULLDEFAULT 1
)
I would lean towards the vigorous because it would be very obvious what data is being referenced by the name. In the loosened version, I could very easily have many tables with a 'id' column or a 'is_active' column.
Inversely, I would lean towards the loosened version because the names are a lot shorter and, thus, easier / faster to type.
I figure, if I'm going to learn a new standard, now's a good time to do so.
So, thoughts? Appreciate the help folks. :)
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 18, 2007
I'm creating a new database for an application that I wish to sell in the future. When we sell it the client will have the option to host is or have us host it. I want to create a name for the database that doesn't describe what the product is. I also want to be able to create new databases if we host it and those names be of a similar convention or subject. I was thinking each would be a Greek god, galaxy names or something along those lines. Does anyone have any suggestions?
Thanks,
Ryan
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2007
I'm coming from a MS Access background and so I'm very used to andcomfortable with the hungarian (Leszynski et al) naming conventions.However, I'm getting started into my first SQL Server Database andreally want to use the appropriate up to date standard namingconvention (ISO compliant).I think I have the general idea from raking though countlessconflicting sites and posts, but I'm a bit stuck on what to doregarding pk / fk namingFor example, in my MS Access world I would have two tables:tblOrders=======strOrderIDintCustomerIDdtOrderDate....tblCustomers==========intCustomerIDstrCustomerName....So what would the appropriate and most up-to-date and standard namingbe for SQL Server? My Guess:Orders=====Ord_Order_ID_PkOrd_Customer_ID_FkOrd_Order_Date....Customers========Cus_Customer_ID_PkCus_Customer_Name....How close (or far) am I from "Celko Proof" naming here?All help gratefully accepted!
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 4, 2007
When I schedule a DTS package as a Job and then look in the job step detail I am presented with the following line.
DTSRun /~Z0x3A2210EB05CE1F9968C82E............etc
This number means nothing to me and I presume it might be encoded or encrypted.
If I wanted to be sure that this code actually relates to the correct DTS package how can I check.
Is there a specific table that will hold that code that will relate it to the DTS package??
Cheers
Tom
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2007
I use data driven subscriptiosn to deliver the same report to 6 different customers. But each customer can see only his data. Reports are saved in a shared folder in xl version. Reports are saved like report_1,report_2 etc. Is there anyother way to name these reports without letting customer to change the name?
Thanks
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2007
Sorry if this seems trivial, but is it allowed to add hyphens in a physical server name?
eg: PC-01
Will this cause any errors (when connecting, etc)
Thanx.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 5, 2007
Is there any standard naming convention for SQL Server that microsoft suggest it?
the same as naming guidlines in MSDN for designing libararies in .Net Framework.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 2007
Hi,
I want to move one database from the source SQL Server 2000 instance to a new SQL 2000 instance in another machine. I have five user databases in this source SQL instance. How should be my approach to move this single database out of this ? My understanding is restoring this database in the new instance, copying all logins to the new instance and then copying the jobs, DTS packages, alerts, operators only specific to this database will do it. Please let me know if this is exactly what I should do ..
Thanks in advance..
Regards,
Himansu
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 2007
Hi,
I want to move one database from the source SQL Server 2000 instance to a new SQL 2000 instance in another machine. I have five user databases in this source SQL instance. How should be my approach to move this single database out of this ? My understanding is restoring this database in the new instance, copying all logins to the new instance and then copying the jobs, DTS packages, alerts, operators only specific to this database will do it. Please let me know if this is exactly what I should do ..
Thanks in advance..
Regards,
Himansu
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2001
I am trying to set up a Named Instance of SQL 2000 on the same machine that has a default instance of SQL 7.0. The setup always completes and I am able to register the Named Instance of the SQL Server with which it was installed on. However, when I try to connect the users to the database, with both windows and SQL authentication, I receive a SQL server not found error. I have tried an alias setup as well as physically specifying the port number in settup up an ODBC connection.
Has anyone ran into similar problems?
Also, has anyone been able to successfully complete the process as mentioned above?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 2, 2007
I have a server with sql server 2005 installed as the default instance -- I have a piece of software that needs SQL2000 to be the default instance. Is there a way other than install new sql2005 named instance and move databases to rename my SQL2005 instance from <machinename> to <machinename>sql05 for example?
Bryan
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2006
Hi all,
i have installed SQL client instance on my Desktop "Machine-A", and i used to connect to SQLServer2000 running on another "Machine-B" by using valid username and password.
i created a DTS package and i used to run it. im very confused how the communication happens between the two machines and which process run where and which initiates which and which machine allocates waht resources. im really interested to know all these things. if any one know plz help me out.
Thanks in advance.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 20, 2003
I have to build a table Physicalcharacterics in sql.
Convention for naming a table
Would I name this table in sql server
tbl_User_PhysicalCharacterics.
My main parent table is tbl_User.
Is that too long of a name.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 18, 2005
I noticed that a lot of my stuff is getting named dbo.XXXXXXX. Why is it happening and what does this mean?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2006
We have two tables. Users and Projects and there is a many-to-many relationship.Ex. A user can be assigned into multiple projects.For the relationship table, should the table name be UserProjects or ProjectUsers?Also should it be singular or plural? (ex. UsersProjects or ProjectsUsers)?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 31, 2000
Hi, can anyone help me with this strange problem?
I am trying to name a new SQL table, but I keep receiving a message that a table with this name already exists in the database. However, when I try to run a SELECT statement using that table, the error msg tells me the object does not exist,and it is not in the combobox of existing tables that can be added to a diagram.
Any clues would be appreciated, thanks !
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 22, 2000
Does anyone know if it is possible to create dynamically named tables from within a stored procedure? The goal is to append a unique identifier on the end of an otherwise static table name to allow for multiple incarnations of the table to exist concurrently while not interfering with each other. For example, we would like to create and use a temp table that is suffixed with a login name to or a timestamp to make it unique.
Is this possible?
View 6 Replies
View Related