Isolation Level Of Connection In Connection Pool

Feb 16, 2007

client: ado.net 2.0 SqlClient, xp sp 2

server: sql server 2005, win 2k

I have a stored proc eg spProcA which does not start a transaction

If I call this proc from ado.net code without any transaction around it affecting the isolation level, the isolation level within the proc call is read committed, as expected

If I then call the same proc within a System.Transacstion.TransactionScope with a different isolation level eg Serializable, then i get the expected isolation level in the proc.

However, if i retry the proc without any transaction around it, the isolation level is now the same as the TransactionScope, (eg Serializable), and this persists until either the connection pool clears down (either because it becomes dormant or via an explicit ClearAllPools.

I can resolve this problem by setting the isolation level in every proc (or call to every proc), but i wondered if i am missing something more straight forward?

View 1 Replies

Viewing Isolation Level From Outside Of A Connection

Mar 3, 2003

Is there any way to confirm the isolation level of a given connection from outside of the connection itself?

As far as I can see, DBCC USEROPTIONS only returns information regarding the current connection.

I am troubleshooting a locking issue and it would be very helpful to me if I could check the isolation level of any given connection.

Thanks in advance for any help.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cannot Allocate More Connection.connect Pool Is At Maximum Increase Max Pool Size

Feb 21, 2007

hi i'm having this error on my application"cannot allocate more connection.connect pool is at maximum increase max pool size" the proble is when i do testing this error does not apply it only Appears when the application is been used by many people
How can I resolve this?
Thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

Timeout Expired. The Timeout Period Elapsed Prior To Obtaining A Connection From The Pool. This May Have Occurred Because All Pooled Connections Were In Use And Max Pool Size Was Reached.

Feb 11, 2004

What does this error message imply?

View 3 Replies View Related

Connection From The Pool

Mar 14, 2007

I build an asp.net 2.0 (VS 2005) web application and put it on the server. The installed SQL server is SQL server 2003. I get this error message when i keep the application running for 10 or 15 mins. "Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occure because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached."
I made the server timeout unlimited but the error keeps coming up after some time of openning the application. The application session time out redirects the user to the login page and doesn't throw an error like the one i mentioned above.
Any idea. Thanks in advance.

View 4 Replies View Related

Max Pool Connection

Jun 28, 2007

hello to all
my problem is
when in database it reaches nearly 100 active connections (i check it from detach database) , my application does not allow me to open new browser page and show me error like:
time out expire. the max connection pool is reached.

please help.

View 2 Replies View Related

Change Connection Pool

Mar 31, 2004

how can i change pool buffer of all connections?

I receive this error for each connection:

System.InvalidOperationException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Server: Connection Pool Low...

Apr 7, 2005

Hi guys!
I have a dev server that has about 15-25 connections which is fine.
**
    Looking at performance counters: _global_
    under SqlClient: Current # connection pools
    under SqlClient: Current # pooled connections
    under SqlClient: Current # pooled and nonpooled connections
**

BUT when I look at staging and production I have only 4 or so...
WHAT'S GOING ON?!?! The querystring doesn't specify the max pool
size, pooling, nor timeout values. So I'm guessing it uses the
defaults. ( I also tried putting in max pool size, but it didn't
change anything! )

Does anyone know how I can increase the value? It is impacting the performance of the site considerably. Thank you!

View 1 Replies View Related

Connection Pool Needed?

Apr 12, 2007

From what I understand, some database drivers provide automatic database pooling, in the sense that when an application closes a connection, it is not dropped until after a certain timeout. If the same, or another application, request a connection then the "pooled" one is returned.

What's the situation with C#, .NET Compact Edition and SQLce? Is it a performance hit to open and close a connection, or is some kind of automatic pooling in effect?

Thanks.

Martin

View 1 Replies View Related

Timeout When Obtaining A Connection From The Pool

Oct 6, 2006

Hi All,I'm having a bit of a problem with a c# program which creates and index file/table. The number of records I need to process is around 3500, the main loop. Each of thoes records I need to look at a 2 text fields and create an entry in an index table for each valid word found in thoes fields. I call a stored proc to save the key word. So this stored proc get called numerous time per record.What seems to be happening is proceese about 400 main rcords the errors out with the following error message: {"Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached." }Has anyone had a similar problem? if so any suggestions on how to fix, I've been looking at this problem and recoding for the last 4 days! I need some help! Using SQL Server 2000 & .net v1.1Thanks in advance Davej

View 1 Replies View Related

Where Connection Pool Reside In Momory?

Sep 26, 2007

Hi All,
Where Connection pool reside, is in client side(in .net framwork) memory or at server(in sql server) momory or at both side it maintains pool information?
Best RegardsImran Zubair

View 4 Replies View Related

Inconsistent Clearing Of Connection Pool

Jan 15, 2008

I'm opening a large number of connections to a SQL server 2005 database using a SQL object based on the System.Data.SqlClient library. When I log out of the application, I call the ClearSQLConnectionPool method of the SQL object and this should clear the pool of these connections. This has worked in the past, but lately I have noticed some odd and very annoying behaviour.Very often I log out of the application and few, if any of the connections disappear. Just this morning I opened the application, logged out and all but one of the connections disappeared. Then I opened it again, logged out and none of the connections had gone. If I open the application again all of the past connections are still there plus the new ones.I know it works, its just very inconsistent. The problem may be with IIS, SQL or with library; I just can't tell which.Any ideas?Many thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

Timeout / Obtaining A Connection From The Pool - Please Help!

Jul 20, 2005

Dear GroupSorry for posting this here. I'm desperate for a solution to thisproblem and thought some of you might have come across it with .NETand SQL Server.Let's assume I've the following code:Private Sub Button4_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e AsSystem.EventArgs) Handles Button4.ClickDim sqlConnection As New System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionsqlConnection.ConnectionString = "workstation id=THEINTREPIDFOX;packetsize=4096;user id=sa;data source=""(local)"";p" & _"ersist security info=False;initial catalog=TestDB"sqlConnection.Open()sqlConnection.Close()sqlConnection = NothingEnd SubWhen I click 100 times on the button the page finally times out with:Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining aconnection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooledconnections were in use and max pool size was reached.Of course I could increase the max pool size but this isn't thesolution to this problem. I wonder what's wrong with my code?According to MSDN, if the connection is closed it's released back intothe pool. Also tried to dispose but nothing helps. It looks like thatit keeps connections and doesn't release them. I'm grateful for anyhints, ideas, suggestions on this problem as I'm very desperate tosolve this.Thanks very much for your time & efforts!Martin

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL Server, Connection Pool And Connections Remaining.

Dec 19, 2003

Hi

I have seen the threads already in here about connections and SQL Server but I too am having a connection pool problem.

I am explicitly making a connection, creating a command object, executing a datareader then closing the command and then disposing the connection. The connection just prior to the dispose is definately closed.

However when I do an sp_who in SQL Server the connection is still listed. I have a connection timeout of 30 seconds, so I am considering reducing this to 5 seconds but dont wish to. So therefore when a process is called repeatedly instead of using an existing connection in the pool, it thinks that this connection is still active and therefore creates a new connection. Because all of this is in an ascx, I cant code for one connection to stay open for all 30 instances of the control.

This is a problem because I am creating controls at run time and using page.databind and at that point, I exceed the connection pool and therefore the site crashes out to the "SQL Server Timeout" error.

Anyone else seen this?

View 1 Replies View Related

SQLServer 2005 - SP2 - Connection Pool Issues

Sep 5, 2007

Hi,

I have recently installed SP2 for SQLServer 2005 and started to have connection pool issues. I have tried to explicitly mention the pool settings in connection string and yet pooling doesn't seem to work. I have one more box with no service packs applied and is pooling is perfect!. Has any one experienced this??

Thank you,

Viswanath Ivatury

View 3 Replies View Related

Connection Pool To Access Sql Server For Multiple User?

Dec 12, 2007

HI,

I am using SqlServer2005 as data base for my web application. I am able to connect to the database through DBCP connection pool . Its working fine for 2 user. When ever 2 users do transaction, it works fine. But 3 users do the transaction, its trowning error.Even i increase the pool size the behavior is same.
error:
com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException: Server failed to resume the transaction, desc: 3f00000002.

For a change I wrote a connection pool to access the DB. I am getting the same error. i.e. Its working fine for 2 user and throws error for more than 2 users.

Is there any setting to be made?

Same application is working fine for Oracle10g.

Regrads
Rupesh

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Explicitly Allocate An Sql Server Connection From The Connections Pool

Feb 21, 2008

Hello.

I have a db dal containing the following code:

SqlCommand cmd = new SqlCommand();

cmd.Connection = dbc;

cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;

cmd.CommandText = "SOME STORED PROCEDURE";
.
.
.
declare some SqlParameters
.
.
.

dbc.Open();

cmd.ExecuteNonQuery();

dbc.Close();

This code, when concurrently running via several threads, yields the following exception:
"The connection was not closed. The connection's current state is open."

My questions are:
1. Why don't .Net allocate another connection from the pool (I try to only concurrently run 2 threads while there are 25 connections in the connection pool) ?
2. How can one explicitly allocate a connection?
3. How do you suggest to solve this problem without a mutex/monitor etc' on the 3 bold lines above and without BeginExequteNonQuery()?

Thank you !

View 2 Replies View Related

Question About Connection Pool From The Servers Point Of View

Nov 2, 2007

I was wondering if someone could help explaining how the SQL Server handles all incoming connections, I and a friend started a discussion about using the connection pool in ADO.NET or not in a specific case.

Usually when creating like an ASP.NET Page it's recommended to use the connection pool, because it optimizes the performance, by using already created connection, so we don't have to recreate the connection all the time. I have always thought that the connection in the connection pool had an open connection on the server. So 5 connections in the connection pool, would be 5 open connections at the server. But after having the discussion with my friend I am not so sure anymore.

Say that I would create a client application (.NET using ADO.NET) that connects to the database and work with that data. If I then have 1.000 clients and each client have a connection pool with 5 connections in it (I think that the default numbers for the connection pool), then there would be like 5.000 open connections on the SQL Server, where most of the connections actually never do anything more than hanging around and waiting... And then the connectionpool is not 1 per client but 1 per connectionstring.

So if my client scenario would access data from 2 different databases, there would actually be 10.000 open connections at the SQL Server. So now I think that there must be a server connection pool or something to handle the connection from the clients. So that there would only be like 10-50 open connections at the server for the 1.000 Clients that was connected.

How is it? Is there 1 open connection in the server for every connection in the connection pool? If that's the case, it would be better for the SQL Server if I don't not use the connection pool in the client, but instead open the connection when we need it, and then close it, and taking that little performance hit every time, to help the performance on the SQL Server.

Best regards

- Magnus

View 1 Replies View Related

Issue With Connection Pool Using JDBC Driver On Tomcat 5.0

Aug 6, 2007

Hi,

I am facing problem in configuring and using connection pooling on tomcat 5.0. I am using JDBC Driver v.1.1 for SQL Server 2005.

Can anybody point me to appropriate samle code or guideline?

Thanks & Regards,

Bhavin P Panchal

View 5 Replies View Related

Need Advise. Problem With Connection Pool. Function Returning SqlDataReader.

Sep 6, 2007

Halo all

I have a problem with "timeout expired. Thei timeout periode elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occured because all pooled connections were use and max pool size was reached"
Then i explore and found out that i did not close my SqlDataReader, SqlDataAdapter, SqlCommand or my connection.

But i have a function that return a  SqlDataReader.
Is this function will cause a connection problem?

Thanks in advance

        Public Function GetDataReader(ByVal strSQL As String, ByVal DBCon As DB.DBConnection) As SqlDataReader            Dim MyCommand As SqlCommand = New SqlCommand(strSQL, DBCon.GetConnection())
            If DBCon.GetConnection().State = ConnectionState.Closed Then                DBCon.GetConnection().Open()            End If
            Dim dr As SqlDataReader = MyCommand.ExecuteReader()
            Return dr
            dr.Close()
        End Function

View 6 Replies View Related

Facing Problem In Increasing Connection String Pool Size Sqlserver

Mar 4, 2005

Hi to all,

I am using a connection string like

data source=RemoteHostName;initial catalog=myDb;password=sa;user id=sa;
Max pool size = 200;

And now strange thing is happening ,, I am receiving error :

Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection
from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in
use and max pool size was reached

The SqlServer Activity Manager is telling that only 100 connections are pooled, and I guess that the Max pool size is 100, It is not being changed by my Connection string. As I am trying to change the default 100 pool size value to 200.

Huh , So stucked up , how to increase the Max pool size.. Is there any way .

I am getting worrried.

Any help ??

Thx and Regards

View 1 Replies View Related

Connection Pool Limit Reached !! Please Help ! (Using Enterprise Library Data Access Application Block)

Apr 22, 2008

This is my code...
public partial class test : System.Web.UI.Page
{protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)
{SqlDatabase database = (SqlDatabase)DatabaseFactory.CreateDatabase("ConnectionString");DbCommand command = database.GetSqlStringCommand("SELECT UserName FROM Users WHERE UserID = '6264'");
using (IDataReader reader = database.ExecuteReader(command))
{if (reader.Read())
{lblTest.Text = "test";
}
}
}
}

This is my error:
Server Error in '/' Application.

Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.InvalidOperationException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.Source Error:

Line 21: //DbCommand command = database.GetStoredProcCommand("CorrUsers_GetByUserId_s");
Line 22: DbCommand command = database.GetSqlStringCommand("SELECT UserName FROM Users WHERE UserID = '6264'");
Line 23: database.ExecuteReader(command);
Line 24: using (IDataReader reader = database.ExecuteReader(command))
Line 25: {Source File: d:webwwwrootchacha078dev.cha.toplingo.com est.aspx.cs Line: 23 Stack Trace:

[InvalidOperationException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.]
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) +1261381
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) +105
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() +111
Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data.Database.GetNewOpenConnection() +195
Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data.Database.GetOpenConnection(Boolean disposeInnerConnection) +106
Microsoft.Practices.EnterpriseLibrary.Data.Database.ExecuteReader(DbCommand command) +62
test.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) in d:webwwwrootchacha078dev.cha.toplingo.com est.aspx.cs:23
System.Web.Util.CalliHelper.EventArgFunctionCaller(IntPtr fp, Object o, Object t, EventArgs e) +15
System.Web.Util.CalliEventHandlerDelegateProxy.Callback(Object sender, EventArgs e) +33
System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +99
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +47
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +1436

Any help with this matter would be very much appreciated.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey Pham

View 3 Replies View Related

What Isolation Level Should I Use?

Jan 12, 2007

lets say user1 is reading row1, then user2 reads and updates row1, when user1 is about to update row1 i want him to be informed that his copy of row1 have been updated, so he has now the options to either get the new version of row1 or cancel his update process.

View 4 Replies View Related

Isolation Level

Nov 15, 2000

Is there a way to change the default isolation level at the SQL Server level to READ UNCOMMITED ??

View 2 Replies View Related

Isolation Level

Jun 30, 2004

Hi, folks. Please guide.
I have a VB application that is used for production and reporting. I 've been having alerts for deadlocks that popup after every 2 or 3 minutes. I am planning to seperate reporing server by using transactional replication from production server to the reporting server. However some reports update and insert data so i need reporting server to be enabled for DML.

Is there any option on the server-level where i can force each user to operate in READ-UNCOMMITTED mode instead of specifying WITH (NOLOCK) in the queries of my application. Dirty reads won't bother me in current situation, i guess the propotion of fast reads would be a better trade-off.
New to SQL, Thanx for helping!!

Howdy.

View 14 Replies View Related

Timeout Expired. The Timeout Period Elapsed Prior To Obtaining A Connection From The Pool

Jan 13, 2008

Server Error in '/' Application.

Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.InvalidOperationException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.Source Error:

An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below. Stack Trace:

[InvalidOperationException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.]
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) +1188873
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) +105
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() +111
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +413
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
DataCaoZuo.Manage_ResultTB_Caozuo(String comstr) +145
Cls_UserManage.GetAllUserList() +18
Index.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) +83
System.Web.Util.CalliHelper.EventArgFunctionCaller(IntPtr fp, Object o, Object t, EventArgs e) +15
System.Web.Util.CalliEventHandlerDelegateProxy.Callback(Object sender, EventArgs e) +34
System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +99
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +47
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +1061

Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.832; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.832

View 1 Replies View Related

Timeout Expired. The Timeout Period Elapsed Prior To Obtaining A Connection From The Pool.

Feb 5, 2004

Ok bear with me here :). I have a server that is getting about 1000000 hits per day with about 10,000 unique vistors. For the past 2 months I have been revamping my code trying to deal with the increase in traffic. I have 2 boxes, one for the website, and one for the SQL. They are connected through a secure backlink so that I dont have to worry about encrypting the data. So the problem started when I updated the MDAC components a few weeks ago. I started getting these freaking timeout errors, they are up to about 1000 errors per hour. I have been monitoring the connection pooling using the system monitor for about a week and have noticed that I am not maxing out the pooling but I am still dropping connections. I went into the web.config and turned my max connections to 1000. Unfortunately this didn't even put a dent in the problem. It doesn't matter if I have 12 or 212 open connections it still drops them. I am at my wits end with trying to debug this problem. I am wondering if anyone else has had similiar problems recently. Also on a side note I have checked all my connections to make sure that I am closing them. Not only do I close my datareaders but I also set them to nothing. In addition to closing and reseting my datareaders I am also disposing and reseting my connection objects as well as closing them. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks,
Daniel Christoffersen

View 3 Replies View Related

Cannot Set Connection Property Of Backup Database Task If Connection String Is Customized In Connection Object

Aug 23, 2006

I added a connection (ADO.NET) object by name testCon in the connection manager - I wanted to programmatically supply the connection string. So I used the "Expressions" property of the connection object and set the connectionstring to one DTS variable. The idea is to supply the connection string value to the variable - so that the connection object uses my connection string.

Then I added a "Backup Database Task" to my package with the name BkpTask. Now whenever I try to set the connection property of BkpTask to the testCon connection object, by typing testCon, it automatically gets cleared. I am not able to set the connection value.

Then after spending several hours I found that this is because I have customized the connection string in testCon. If I don't customize the connection string, I am able to enter the "testCon" value in the connection property of the BkpTask.

Is this an intrinsic issue?

View 2 Replies View Related

Transaction Isolation Level

Sep 10, 2002

Hello all,

What is the TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL settings for MSSQL like the default setting in Oracle. In Oracle the default setting allows one session to read consistent data without waiting for the other sessions to commit/rollback the data.

For eg: In Mssql, if I update table A in the first session, and in another session (second session) if I select from table A, the second session waits till the first session completes the updates and commit or rollbacks.

But in Oracle , if I update table A in the first session, and in another session (second session) if I select from table A, the second session will perform a read from the ROLLBACK SEGS and give a read consistent data without waiting for the first session to commit or rollback the transaction.

Is this type of behaviour is possible is MSSQL. And If YES how can I do it?

Thanks for any help
Suresh

View 10 Replies View Related

Isolation Level Serializable

Jul 4, 2005

Hi all,
can anyone give me more information on
set transaction isolation level serializable ?? I want to prove some lock to use on online insert and update.
Thank you every much.

View 14 Replies View Related

Transaction Isolation Level

Jul 24, 2007

Not sure if this is more a .Net question or SQL Server, but I think it belongs here.

I have a small .Net app that reads records from a bunch of files from disk and inserts them into a database table. There could be several hundred files resulting in 100,000 records or more each time its run. Since it's a large table there are of course a few indexes on it so the insert takes a while. For larger sessions it could run as long as an hour. I need it to run in a transaction so that if anything happens while it's running the records from that run were committed on an all or nothing basis. However, I don't want to lock the table at all while the insert is happening. These aren't transaction records or anything like that, and the batches are separated by client so there will be no conflicts (no need to lock the table).

Unfortunately, no matter what I use for the isolation level of the transaction the table always ends up locked for reads. Data from previous runs is live at this point and we can't allow that. I have the choice of the following isolation levels when I create the transaction, but none seems to work:
Chaos
ReadCommitted
ReadUncommitted
RepeatableRead
Serializable
Snapshot
Unspecified

I would expect Chaos, ReadUncommitted, or Snapshot be okay here, but I can't seem to get it working. Any thoughts?

View 4 Replies View Related

Transaction Isolation Level

Nov 3, 2007

Hi,I have 1 SQL statement selecting data from various tables and updating othertables.The question then is how do I prevent other applications from modifying thetables that I'm working on (that is while my transaction is being executed)?I know that the isolation level should be either REPEATABLE READ orSERIALIZABLE. But I need confirmation on if one of these actually solve myissue - prevents other applications/threads from modifying/inserting datainto the same tables that I'm working on.Thanks in advance,Daniel

View 5 Replies View Related

Isolation Level Issue

May 7, 2008

I have an issue in one of my stored procs. I set the Isolation level to read uncommitted at the beginning of the proc and then I try to reset this isolation level back to read committed. When reset the isolation level, I get and error. has anyone encountered this before?

Thank you

View 3 Replies View Related