Hello all,
I have been using T-SQL for a while now although the majority of my work required relativley simple queries.
I just need to know is there a way to JOIN the results of several SELECT queries, maybe through the use of functions??
A reference to any online article would be most helpful.
Cheers,
Sean
I have two queries as below;
SELECT EventID, Role, EventDuty, Qty, StartTime, EndTime, Hours
FROM dbo.tblEventStaffRequired;
and
SELECT EventID, Role, StartTime, EndTime, Hours, COUNT(ID) AS Booked
FROM tblStaffBookings
GROUP BY EventID, Role, StartTime, EndTime, Hours;
How can I join the results of the two by matching the columns EventID, Role, StartTime and EndTime in the two and have the following columns in output EventID, Role, EventDuty, Qty, StartTime, EndTime, Hours and Booked?
Why does this right join return the same results as using a left (or even a full join)?There are 470 records in Account, and there are 1611 records in Contact. But any join returns 793 records.
select Contact.firstname, Contact.lastname, Account.[Account Name]
from Contact
right join Account
on Contact.[Account Name] = Account.[Account Name]
where Contact.[Account Name] = Account.[Account Name]
Hi,
I would like to use the result table of the first query in a number of other queries. How do I do this ?
Thanks.
I have created a search interface for a large table and I allow users to search on keywords. The users can enter multiple keywords and I build a SQL based on their input to search a full-text indexed table. However the users want to be able to search like an old system they had, where they enter single words and then combine their searches to drill-down into the results. What would be the best method to combine searches?At the moment I can create a merged query from 2 queries if they have searched using single words, but I know down the line it will get far more complicated if they keep combining and merging even with multiple word entries. Each time they search I store the 'where' section of each query, then if they choose to combine I have a function to build a new query through arrays (to eliminate duplicates and sort etc)Is there a better way in SQL to combine queries as sometimes the logic of the combined query means no results are returned (because of OR/ AND conditions in the wrong places etc)e.g.1. Select count(ID) as myCount FROM myTable where (CONTAINS(title,'"run"') OR CONTAINS(subject,'"run"'))2. Select count(ID) as myCount FROM myTable where (CONTAINS(title,'"level"') OR CONTAINS(subject,'"level"'))Combined using my function creates:Select count(ID) as myCount FROM myTable where (contains(title,'"level"') AND contains(title,'"run"')) OR (contains(subject,'"level"') AND contains(subject,'"run"'))
When I combine I'm drilling down, so if the first query returns a count of 400 (where the title OR subject contains 'run') and then the second query returns 600 records (where the title OR subject contains 'level') I need to combine so that I'm looking for records where the title contains both keywords 'run' AND 'level' OR else the subject contains both 'run' AND 'level' and I end up with say 50 records where the title has both keywords OR the subject holds both words. I think the main trouble lies if they try combine a previously combines search with a new search. here my logic gets totally thrown and I'm not sure how to handle soemthing like this. Has anyone got any ideas or experience with this kind of functionality? In SQL or even in vb.net is there a method to combine searches easily?
I'm trying to create a list of orders in my db that has been created correctly (some orders are not dealt with correctly...) An order should go from "open -> assigned" to "assigned -> responded" status.
I got the following query:
select org.name, count(order) AS correct, NULL AS Total
from order
left join orderstatus o1 on order.id = o1.order_id
left join orderstatus o2 on order.id = o2.order_id
left join org on order.orgid on user.id
where
o1.status = 'Open -> Assigned'
and o2.status = 'Assigned -> Responded'
and o1.time_stamp < o2.time_stamp
This gives me a list of all organisations with the correct number of orders in the system...
But now I need to add the total number of tickets they got in the system. So I was thinking about a union with a query without the were constraints
UNION 'with the above query
select org.name, NULL AS correct, count(order) AS Total
from order
left join orderstatus o1 on order.id = o1.order_id
left join orderstatus o2 on order.id = o2.order_id
left join org on order.orgid on user.id
..but that gives me a list like this:
name correct total
org1 324 NULL
org1 NULL 423
How can I combine them, or maybe doing it a better way?
Hi,
I have to queries that return tables with the same names. How do i add these 2 so it returns one table?
Thanks for your help.
Mike
Hi all,Here is my problem, I have 3 tables :People-------------IDPeopleFirstnameLastnameCars------------IDPeopleCarnameBoats------------IDPeopleBoatname1 person can have 0 or n car/boatI want to a result set displaying : Firstname, Lastname, NumberOfCars,NumberOfBoatsI have two queries, but i want to merge the results in one. how can i dothis ?This one gives me FIRSTNAME, LASTNAME and CARCOUNT------------------------------------SELECT dbo.People.IDPeople, dbo.People.FirstName, dbo.People.LastName,COUNT(dbo.Cars.CarName) AS CARCOUNTFROM dbo.People LEFT OUTER JOINdbo.Cars ON dbo.People.IDPeople = dbo.Cars.IDPeopleGROUP BY dbo.People.IDPeople, dbo.People.FirstName, dbo.People.LastNameThis one gives me FIRSTNAME, LASTNAME and BOATCOUNT------------------------------------SELECT dbo.People.IDPeople, dbo.People.FirstName, dbo.People.LastName,COUNT(dbo.Boats.BoatName) AS BOATCOUNTFROM dbo.People LEFT OUTER JOINdbo.Boats ON dbo.People.IDPeople = dbo.Boats.IDPeopleGROUP BY dbo.People.IDPeople, dbo.People.FirstName, dbo.People.LastNameThanks in advancePhil
View 2 Replies View RelatedDoes anyone know how I can 'join' the results ofone SQL query to the bottom of another?Eg. I have two queries:1. SELECT Name, Surname FROM People WHERE Surname = SmithNAME SURNAMEAdam SmithJohn SmithMichael SmithSteve Smith2. SELECT Name, Surname FROM People WHERE Surname = JonesNAME SURNAMEBob JonesLarry JonesTom JonesWhat I want to produce is:NAME SURNAMEAdam SmithJohn SmithMichael SmithSteve SmithBob JonesLarry JonesTom JonesHowever, if I use UNION like this:SELECT Name, Surname FROM People WHERE Surname = SmithUNIONSELECT Name, Surname FROM People WHERE Surname = Jonesit mixes up all the results:NAME SURNAMEAdam SmithBob JonesJohn SmithLarry JonesMichael SmithSteve SmithTom Jones(I guess it's sorting by the first field, NAME).Is there a way to stop it sorting the results, so that itjust tacks the second query results to the bottom of thefirst query results?(I realise I could use "ORDER BY Surname" to get the same resultin this simple example, but for the more complicated queriesI want to use it won't work).Thanks for any help,Matt.
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi,
I am new to MDX and I have created a query listed below, this returns the correct information from the cube. However when I split the query into a CREATE SET and Query the data returned is wrong. I need to include the set creation in the cube but this returns the wrong information. I thought that information returned by these two queries would be indentical can anyone explain please.
Thanks David
SELECT
({[Time Calculations].&[Current Period],[Time Calculations].[Prior Year]}) on columns,
Filter (([Store].[Store No].[Store No].Members),
([LFL Month Store].[Month Lf L Store].&[Month LfL Store]) <> 0) on rows
from finance
where( [LFL Calendar].[LFL Calendar Hierarchy].[Year].&[2008].&[Qtr 1 2008].&[P3:April 2008] ,
[Measures].[GL Amount])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
create SET [Finance].[LFL Stores List] AS
Filter (([Store].[Store No].[Store No].Members),
([LFL Month Store].[Month Lf L Store].&[Month LfL Store]) <> 0)
SELECT
({[Time Calculations].&[Current Period],[Time Calculations].[Prior Year]}) on columns,
[LFL Stores List] on rows
from finance
where( [LFL Calendar].[LFL Calendar Hierarchy].[Year].&[2008].&[Qtr 1 2008].&[P3:April 2008] ,
[Measures].[GL Amount])
hi,
my first query is:
"SELECT TBL_STOK.stok_adi, TBL_STOK.fiyat1 FROM TBL_STOK INNER JOIN" _
TBL_BARKOD ON TBL_STOK.stok_id = TBL_BARKOD.stok_id " _
where TBL_BARKOD.barkod=@barkod"
second query :
"SELECT TBL_STOKDEPO.fiyat1 FROM TBL_BARKOD left outer JOIN TBL_STOKDEPO ON TBL_BARKOD.stok_id = TBL_STOKDEPO.stok_id" _
where TBL_BARKOD.barkod=@barkod and TBL_STOKDEPO.depo_kod=@depokod "
i want to merge these queries' results.first query returns 2 columns (TBL_STOK.stok_adi, TBL_STOK.fiyat1)
second query returns 1 column (TBL_STOKDEPO.fiyat1) .but i want a query that returns 3 columns (TBL_STOK.stok_adi, TBL_STOK.fiyat1,TBL_STOKDEPO.fiyat1)
I'm trying to devise a query for use on SQL Server 2000 that will dowhat was previously done with one query in MS Access. The MS Accessquery was like this:SELECT Count(*) as [Opened],Abs(Sum([Status] Like 'Cancel*')) As [Cancelled]FROM Detail_Dir_LocVWhere (Detail_Dir_LocV.DateOpened > '2004-8-01') andStatus not like 'Deleted'Group By Year(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened)Order By Year(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened)Here were I'm at with SQL Server, TSQLSelect Right(Convert(Char (11), Min(DateOpened), 106), 8) as [MonthOpened],Count(Status) as [Opened]FROM Detail_Dir_LocVWhere (Detail_Dir_LocV.DateOpened > '2004-8-01') andStatus not like 'Deleted'Group By Year(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened) Order ByYear(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened)Which yieldsMonthOpened======================Aug 2004503Sep 2004752Oct 2004828Nov 2004658Dec 2004533Jan 2005736Feb 2005707Mar 2005797Apr 2005412AndSelect Right(Convert(Char (11), Min(DateOpened), 106), 8) as [MonthOpened],Count(Status) as [Cancelled]FROM Detail_Dir_LocVWhere (Detail_Dir_LocV.DateOpened > '2004-8-01') andStatus like 'Cancelled%'Group By Year(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened) Order ByYear(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened)Which yields;MonthCancelled=========================Aug 200478Sep 2004105Oct 2004121Nov 2004106Dec 200475Jan 200582Feb 200571Mar 200594Apr 200533What is desired isMonthOpenedCancelled============================Aug 200450378Sep 2004752105Oct 2004828121Nov 2004658106Dec 200453375Jan 200573682Feb 200570771Mar 200579794Apr 200541233Any assistance would be appreciated.Cheers;Bill
View 3 Replies View RelatedCustomers order a product and enter in a source code (sourceCd). This sourceCd is tied to a marketing program. Idea being we can see that 100 customers ordered from this promo, 200 from this catalog, etc etc. The sourceCd that a customer enters is not always accurate so there is a magic process that adjusts this OrigSourceCd into a final SourceCd, that may or may not be the same.
I am trying to generate a result set of customer count by sales program based on both the original and final source code. Problem is, I have to do each query separately because in one, I have to join SourceCdKey to SourceCdKey to get the program associated with that SourceCd and in the other i have to join OrigSourceCdKey to SourceCdKey to get the program associated with the original sourceCd. There are some programs is one results set that are not in the other, and vice versa.
I'm trying to generate a list of that shows customer counts before and after for each program, some which may be null for one, but have counts for the other. I have tries creating 2 separating views and joining them but that doesn't work because it only returns the ones they have in common.
I am running a SQL stored procedure which runs 3 queries on 3 different SQL tables. What is my best option to export the results of these 3 queries to excel?
If it matters they are all SELECT queries, and at most will return < 500 rows.
I have made a couple of queries I want to use into a Visual studio project, Now is my problem:
All my queries have different statements. I believe the best is to show the results in a Datagridview
How to view them there? I know how to do it... but I have got about 30 queries
Here is my code so far:
Private Sub Form1_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load
ComboBox1.DataSource = MyDB_DevDataSet.DataSetName.
Dim connectionString As String = "Data Source=myDBmySRV;Initial Catalog=Teknotrans_dev;Integrated Security=True"
Dim sql As String = "SELECT * FROM CompanyMain"
[Code] ....
Hello,I am trying to create a view that shows the followingField1: Sum of Amounts from Table AField2: Count of Amounts from Table AField3: Sum of of Amounts from Table BField4: Count of Amounts from Table B......Field3: Sum of of Amounts from Table HField4: Count of Amounts from Table H......Things are a bit more complex but this is the gist.I am using SQL 2000.I know how to do this pretty easily using a stored procedure. But howcan I do it in a view? A SQL server won't meet my needs in thissituation.I tried OpenQuery ('myserver', 'exec myprocedure') but get the messagethat my server is not configured for data access. I tried the systemstored procedure to set data access to true but nothing seemed tohappen.I also tried Select * from (Select Statement1, select statement2)but got syntax error at the comma between statement1 and statement2.Trying to use select Statement1 as ABC to does not seem to work either.Is there a way to do what I want without making 15 views and then afinal view that shows them all together? I know I could probably dosomething by creating a ton of functions, but it really seems thisshould not be that hard...I am definitely open to any easy suggestions!Thanks,Ryan
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi,
We have a client who runs SQL Server 2000 queries on one database server and performance is approx. 4 seconds. If the database is backed up, no tables in the query or indexes on these tables are modified (we may run a small script that affects stored procedures, views, etc.) the query can run virtually forever.
The customer is runing a cluster and we are running a stand-alone. Although, the two environments that they run in and have these wildly different results in are the same.
The queries are not worth listing (join a couple of tables and views, select a few columns, put on a few conditions--nothing crazy).
Is this normal behavior for MS SQL Server?
I've personally seen where a database is backed up and query plans and performance are different from one server to another, but we are looking at extreme cases here. In fact, on the second server, the majority of the queries are faster and only a couple run very slowly.
Also, the query optimizer seems to be making poor decisions at this custoemer. For example, two tables will be cross joined (forming over 200 million records) and then table scans ensue. The process in some cases will take a 4 second query to 45 minutes.
To me none of this makes any sense. I've been working with SQL Server since 1997 and have not experienced any type of performance problems or variances of this magnitude. Although this is a 6GB database, SQL Server 7 ran on a terabyte without even blinking, so I wouldn't understand why this would have anything to do with it.
Also hampering our efforts is that we do not have easy access to this SQL Server database to get our hands on it and debug these issues.
Does anyone know of a way to examine these issues in a "system wide" manner to determine what the problems could be since the problems are not specific to the database (i.e. .bak file) but seem to be specific to the server?
They have also had database corruption (an index that wouldn't update) and had to roll back the database. Would that indicate that the MDF/LDF's are unstable? Is there a way to figure out if there is some type of MDF/LDF file structure corruption?
Thanks,
Henry.
I'm having difficulty coming up with the right syntax for a query. Suppose I have a database containing a Stores table, an ProductInventory table, and a Customers table. The Stores table has an ID field that serves as a foreign key in both the ProductInventory table and in the Customers table. I'm trying to write a query that, for each Store record, will return the total number of records in the ProductInventory table and the total number of records in the Customers table.
The following query returns, for each store, the total number of records in the ProductInventory table:
SELECT Stores.Name,
COUNT(ProductInventory.ID) AS ProductInventoryItemCount
FROM Stores
LEFT JOIN ProductInventory ON Stores.ID = ProductInventory.StoreID
GROUP BY Stores.Name
The following query returns, for each store, the total number of records in the Customers table:
SELECT Stores.Name,
COUNT(Customers.ID) AS CustomerCount
FROM Stores
LEFT JOIN ProductInventory ON Stores.ID = Customers.StoreID
GROUP BY Stores.Name
I combined the two queries:
SELECT Stores.Name,
COUNT(ProductInventory.ID) AS ProductInventoryItemCount,
COUNT(Customers.ID) AS CustomerCount
FROM Stores
LEFT JOIN ProductInventory ON Stores.ID = ProductInventory.StoreID
LEFT JOIN Customers ON Stores.ID = Customers.StoreID
GROUP BY Stores.Name
When I run this last query, however, I get an "Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type int" error. Using COUNT_BIG instead of COUNT eliminates the error, but the numbers that are generated are astronomical in size. This indicates to me that there is a *lot* more table joining going on than I expected
What is the correct syntax to produce the desired results? I have a few other tables similar to ProductInventory and Customers; I'm hoping to extend the correct syntax so as to be able to get a comprehensive record count list for each store. Thanks for your help!
Hello:
What is the difference between:
select * from table1, table2 where ......
And
select * from table1 Inner Join table2 ....
Is there a performance difference or any other difference?
thanks
Hi,
Can you give the equivalent query for the following Oracle query :
SELECT col2, col3 FROM submission,
lkup so
WHERE so.txt (+) = TRIM(col2)
ANDso.pid (+) = 'SO'
ANDso.cde (+) = 'RW'
In the above query a constant value is used in JOIN, so I am not aware of how to use the JOIN clause for the above constant value ( 'SO' , 'RW' )
Upto my knowledge about JOIN query equivalents :
Oracle query :-
select *from test1 a, test2 b where a.sno(+) = b.col
Equivalent SQL Server query :-
select *from test1 a JOIN test2 b on a.sno = b.col
Hope the above is correct. Here my doubt is, if in the above query, b.col is replaced by a constant value say 'abcd' , then what will be the table name used in right of the JOIN clause. Or any other equivalent for this is available ?
Eg :-
Oracle query :-
select *from test1 a, test2 b where a.sno(+) = 'abcd'
Thanks,
Sam
Hi,
Can you give the equivalent query for the following Oracle query :
SELECT col2, col3 FROM submission,
lkup so
WHERE so.txt (+) = TRIM(col2)
AND so.pid (+) = 'SO'
AND so.cde (+) = 'RW'
In the above query a constant value is used in JOIN, so I am not aware of how to use the JOIN clause for the above constant value ( 'SO' , 'RW' )
Upto my knowledge about JOIN query equivalents :
Oracle query :-
select *from test1 a, test2 b where a.sno(+) = b.col
Equivalent SQL Server query :-
select *from test1 a RIGHT JOIN test2 b on a.sno = b.col
Hope the above is correct. Here my doubt is, if in the above query, b.col is replaced by a constant value say 'abcd' , then what will be the table name used in right of the JOIN clause. Or any other equivalent for this is available ?
Eg :-
Oracle query :-
select *from test1 a, test2 b where a.sno(+) = 'abcd'
Thanks,
Sam
Hi,
First, my knowledge of MDX is very limited :o
I am wondering if it is possible to return the result of 2 different queries as one. Similarly, like using UNION in SQL. I looked into the MDX UNION but it works on sets.
Basically, I have 2 queries; one with territory sales and one with region sales. I would like to return the results of all the territories followed by the sales of the region in one go.
Thanks in advance.
I am trying to do an inner join on two sub-queries, and I can't figure out what I am doing wrong here. I keep getting syntax errors:
Code:
SELECT * FROM
(SELECT SSN
FROM [1099_PER]
INNER
JOIN ( SELECT SSN, name4, count(*) from [1099_PER]
group by SSN, name4
[Code] .....
So I'm trying out full-text indexing for the first time and, in particular, FileTables in SQL Server 2012. I've followed a Microsoft walkthrough and everything seems to be ok. However, when I query the table using the CONTAINS keyword, I get no results (a regular query to make sure there are records in the table returns the expected number of results).
I'm now trying to troubleshoot, and have been using the FULLTEXTCATALOGPROPERTY function, but I don't understand the results.
If I run SELECT FULLTEXTCATALOGPROPERTY(N'CatlogName',N'ItemCount'), I get a result of 51. There are 96 documents in the NTFS folder where the documents are stored, and the table has 96 records, so I don't know where 51 is coming from. 55 of the documents are .DOC files, the rest are .PDF, and some (or maybe all) of the PDFs are scanned images of documents, which I don't expect to be indexed, so maybe that explains it. And in another thread in these forums, a poster suggests that the result for this function should be either 0 or 1, with 0 meaning that no documents are pending indexing, but maybe I've misunderstood that.
If I run SELECT FULLTEXTCATALOGPROPERTY(N'CatalogName',N'UniqueKeyCount'), I get a result of 2. I have got two full-text indexes in this catalog (one on the FileTable, one on a regular table with FT enabled). Is this result therefore expected? Again, reading online seems to suggest that a result of 0 is desirable, but I don't understand why, and if it is I don't understand why my result is 2!
I've now also run SELECT* FROM sys.dm_fts_index_keywords(DB_ID('DatabaseName'), Object_ID('dbo.FileTableName)), which I believe is supposed to list all of the indexed words from the table specified. I get one row returned, as follows:
keyword: 0xFF
display_term: END OF FILE
column_id: 2
document_count: 40
So basically, it's not indexed any words at all. And why is the document count only 40 when there are 96 documents in the folder and table?
I want to get output of below query in single row.
Select 'Name'
Select 'Surname'
Expected output is Name,Surname
I get a wo_ID and want to query company data. I have the following tables, work_orders (has wo_ID, wo_name and install_id), install_ids (has install_id, comp_id) and customers (comp_id, company_name). The query process goes like this: I get a wo_ID and I need to find the install_id that corresponds with that wo_ID in that same work_orders table. Then take that install_id and find out the comp_id that corresponds with that install_id from the install_ids table. Finally take that customer_id and link it to comp_id in the customers table to find out company data. I need to join it multiple times to get my final data. I have a simple one that works right now with one join and using the install_id, but I don't know how to expand it with multiple joins. Thanks.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a page that will require several hundred update queries to be sent to the database. How much of a performance increase will i get by joining them all into one statement and sending them as a batch instead of running them one by one?
Thanks.
I am having a problem with a query,I am not sure if i would use a join or a subquery to complete thisproblem.I have two queries, and i need to divide one by the other, but i cantseem to get anytype of join to work with them.Here is the situation.I have a projectDB table that has a list of different projects foreach employee to work on.Each project has an employee assigned to it.The start date is null until the employee starts to work on it.I want to find how many percent of all their projects that eachemployee is working on.In other words:I want to divide query A by query B to see how many percent ofprojects each employee is working on.Query A count of projects that are being worked because they have adate per employee:SELECT employee, COUNT(employee) AS cntFROM projectDBGROUP BY employee, project_start_dateHAVING (NOT (project_start_date IS NULL)) //notice the NOTQuery B: Total amount of project per employee:SELECT employee, COUNT(employee) AS cntFROM projectDBGROUP BY employee, project_start_dateAny ideas?
View 4 Replies View Relatedhi thereanyone had an idea to join following 2 queries to 1????----- QUERY 1 ---------------------------------------------SELECT TMS_CaseF_2.Name AS TCDomain_0,TMS_CaseF_3.Name AS TCDomain_1,TMS.CaseF.Name AS TCFolder_2,TMS_CaseF_1.Name AS TCFolder_3,TMS.TestCase.Name AS TCName_4,TMS_TestCase_1.Name AS TCName_5,TMS.LogFolder.Name AS PlannedLogFolder_6,TMS.Log.Name AS PlannedLog_7,TMS.CaseResult.RecordedCaseName AS TCRecordedName_8,TMS.TestPlan.Name AS Plan_9FROM((((((((((TMS.Build INNER JOIN TMS.LogFolder ON TMS.Build.UID =TMS.LogFolder.Build)INNER JOIN TMS.Log ON TMS.LogFolder.UID = TMS.Log.LogFolder)INNER JOIN TMS.CaseResult ON TMS.Log.UID = TMS.CaseResult.Log)INNER JOIN TMS.TestCase ON TMS.CaseResult.TestCase =TMS.TestCase.UID)LEFT JOIN TMS.CaseF ON TMS.TestCase.Parent = TMS.CaseF.UID)LEFT JOIN TMS.TestCase AS TMS_TestCase_1 ON TMS.TestCase.Parent =TMS_TestCase_1.UID)LEFT JOIN TMS.CaseF AS TMS_CaseF_1 ON TMS_TestCase_1.Parent =TMS_CaseF_1.UID)LEFT JOIN TMS.CaseF AS TMS_CaseF_2 ON TMS_CaseF_1.Parent =TMS_CaseF_2.UID)LEFT JOIN TMS.CaseF AS TMS_CaseF_3 ON TMS.CaseF.Parent =TMS_CaseF_3.UID)INNER JOIN TMS.TestPlan ON TMS.TestCase.TestPlan = TMS.TestPlan.UID)WHERE (((TMS.LogFolder.Name) Like 'TR1%')AND ((TMS.Build.Name)='Planning_VD10A'))ORDER BY TMS.CaseF.Name,TMS_CaseF_1.Name,TMS.TestCase.Name,TMS_TestCase_1.Name;------------------------------------------------------------------ QUERY 2 ---------------------------------------------SELECT TMS.CaseResult.RecordedCaseNameFROM ((TMS.Build INNER JOIN TMS.LogFolder ON TMS.Build.UID =TMS.LogFolder.Build)INNER JOIN TMS.Log ON TMS.LogFolder.UID = TMS.Log.LogFolder)INNER JOIN TMS.CaseResult ON TMS.Log.UID = TMS.CaseResult.LogWHERE (((TMS.LogFolder.Name) Like 'VD%')AND ((TMS.Build.Name)='VD10A IT_APP'));
View 1 Replies View RelatedIn the T-SQL below, I retrieved data from two queries and I've tried to join them to create a report in SSRS 2008 R2. The SQL runs, but I can't create a report from it. (I also couldn't get this query to run in an Excel file that connects to my SQL Server data base. I've used other T-SQL queries in this Excel file and they run fine.) I think that's because I am creating temporary tables. How do I modify my SQL so that I can get the same result without creating temporary tables?
/*This T-SQL gets the services for the EPN download from WITS*/
-- Select services entered in the last 20 days along with the MPI number and program code.
SELECT DISTINCT dbo.group_session_client.note, dbo.group_session_client.error_note, dbo.group_session_client.group_session_id,
dbo.group_session_client.group_session_client_id, dbo.group_session.signed_note, dbo.group_session.unsigned_note
into #temp_group_sessions
FROM dbo.group_session_client, dbo.group_session
WHERE dbo.group_session_client.group_session_id = dbo.group_session.group_session_id
-- Select group notes
SELECT DISTINCT
dbo.client_ssrs.state_client_number, dbo.delivered_service_detail.program_name, dbo.delivered_service_detail.start_date,
dbo.delivered_service_detail.start_time,
dbo.delivered_service_detail.service_name, dbo.delivered_service_detail.cpt_code, dbo.delivered_service_detail.icd9_code_primary,
[code]....
-- Form an outer join selecting all services with any group notes attached to them.
select * from #temp_services
LEFT OUTER JOIN #temp_group_sessions
on #temp_services.group_session_client_id = #temp_group_sessions.group_session_client_id
;
-- Drop temporary tables
DROP TABLE #temp_group_sessions;
DROP TABLE #temp_services;
I have recently started working on Sql server management studio. I have been using MS access in the past. To link results of 2 queries in MS access I would open the query wizard and it would show me the list of saved queries and then I could join them as regular tables. Im trying to look for this option in management studio. When I open query designer in management studio I am only given the option to add existing tables, how can I add existing queries?
View 2 Replies View Related
Good morning!
Or good "whatever daytime you read this"!
SQL Server 2005 has this nice new feature Common table expression or CTE, which allows quite easy to define a "drill down" in recursive self join tables.
By recursive self join tables I mean this common example:
idPerson INT <--------|
idReportsTo INT ---------|
PersonName VARCHAR
A CTE to "go down" the tree from any entry point and find all subs to a parent entry is well documented. I managed to make myself a CTE and use it a lot!
What I find myself needing too often is:
a) Look up from a deep position and find the entry that is for example 3 steps above my reference in the branch
b) Look up from a deep position and find the one that is 2nd or 3rd level (absolute) from top of the tree in the branch
I did try quite some versions, but I cannot get it to work. Any idea how you do the "drill up" with a CTE or another SQL solution.
Of course performance is always needed, so I'd like to avoid the cursors I got it working with and use now. (It is not working good I admit...)
Cheers!
Ralf
We have the follwoing environment
Sql2005 64 bit edition standard edition servers
Sql2000 Sp3 enterprise edition servers
when we try to access a table in sql2000 from sql2005 using linked server, the query also uses inner joins and max()
it gives the follwoing error
"Msg 8180, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Statement(s) could not be prepared.
Msg 207, Level 16, State 3, Line 1
Invalid column name 'Col1017'."
The query looks something like this
select *FROM [X.X.X.X.].HRDE.dbo.PS_HX_LVE_FRM_SRCH A, [X.X.X.X.].HRDE.dbo.PS_NAMES B
WHERE A.EMPLID = B.EMPLID
AND A.HX_LEAVE_STATUS = 'PND'
AND B.EFFDT IN (SELECT MAX(EFFDT) FROM [X.X.X.X.].HRDE.dbo.PS_NAMES WHERE EMPLID = A.EMPLID)