I have two tables a and b, where I want to add columns from b to a with a criteria. The columns will be added by month criteria. There is a column in b table called stat_month which ranges from 1 (Jan) to 12 (Dec). I want to keep all the records in a, and join columns from b for each month. I do not want to loose any row from a if there is no data for that row in b.
I do not know how to have the multiple joins for 12 different months and what join I have to use. I used left join but still I am loosing not all but few rows in a, I would also like to know how in one script I can columns separately from stat_mont =’01’ to stat_month =’12’
/****** Script for SelectTopNRows command from SSMS ******/
SELECT a.[naics]
,a.[ust_code]
,a.[port]
,a.[all_qty_1_yr]
,a.[all_qty_2_yr]
[Code] ....
Output should have all columns from a and join columns from b when the months = '01' (for Jan) , '02' (for FEB), ...'12' (for Dec): Output table should be something like
* columns from a AND JAN_Cum_qty_1_mo JAN_Cum_qty_2_mo JAN_Cum_all_val_mo JAN_Cum_air_val_mo JAN_Cum_air_wgt_mo JAN_Cum_ves_val_mo FEB_Cum_qty_1_mo FEB_Cum_qty_2_mo FEB_Cum_all_val_mo FEB_Cum_air_val_mo FEB_Cum_air_wgt_mo FEB_Cum_ves_val_mo .....DEC_Cum_qty_1_mo DEC_Cum_qty_2_mo DEC_Cum_all_val_mo DEC_Cum_air_val_mo DEC_Cum_air_wgt_mo DEC_Cum_ves_val_mo (FROM TABLE b)
I have two tables a and b, where I want to add columns from b to a with a criteria. The columns will be added by month criteria. There is a column in b table called stat_month which ranges from 1 (Jan) to 12 (Dec). I want to keep all the records in a, and join columns from b for each month. I do not want to loose any row from a if there is no data for that row in b.
I do not know how to have the multiple joins for 12 different months and what join I have to use. I used left join but still I am loosing not all but few rows in a, I would also like to know how in one script I can columns separately from stat_mont =’01’ to stat_month =’12’
/****** Script for SelectTopNRows command from SSMS ******/ SELECT a.[naics] ,a.[ust_code] ,a.[port] ,a.[all_qty_1_yr] ,a.[all_qty_2_yr]
[Code] ....
output should have all columns from a and join columns from b when the months = '01' (for Jan) , '02' (for FEB), ...'12' (for Dec): Output table should be something like
* columns from a AND JAN_Cum_qty_1_mo JAN_Cum_qty_2_mo JAN_Cum_all_val_mo JAN_Cum_air_val_mo JAN_Cum_air_wgt_mo JAN_Cum_ves_val_mo FEB_Cum_qty_1_mo FEB_Cum_qty_2_mo FEB_Cum_all_val_mo FEB_Cum_air_val_mo FEB_Cum_air_wgt_mo FEB_Cum_ves_val_mo .....DEC_Cum_qty_1_mo DEC_Cum_qty_2_mo DEC_Cum_all_val_mo DEC_Cum_air_val_mo DEC_Cum_air_wgt_mo DEC_Cum_ves_val_mo (FROM TABLE b)
I have a straight-forward select query to show work orders for a particular customer as below. I want to add a field value from another table, deltickitem diwhich contains contract records. I need to include the field di.weekchg to show the weekly hire rate, but the joined query must ensure that the both the contract number matches that in the original select and that the item number matches that in the actual select. Additionally, there is the problem that the item can appear more than once in the deltickitem table against a particular contract (if item has been off-hired and then re-hired on the same contract number) - in this case the query must select the record with the highest di.counter number, which I haven't worked out how to put in my query.
This is my basic code, but I keep ending up with duplicate work order lines in my result set.
Select wh.worknumber, wh.custnum, wh.contract, wh.sitename, wh.itemcode, wh.regnum, m.name, di.weekchg, wh.date_created, wh.task_descr, wh.actual_labour_sale+wh.actual_parts_sale as [Repair Cost] From worksorderhdr wh Left Join inventory iv On iv.item = wh.itemcode inner Join models m On m.id = iv.model_id left join deltickitem di on di.dticket = wh.contract where wh.custnum = 'BARRATNE' and wh.rejected <> 1 and wh.charge_to_cust = 1 order by wh.date_created
SELECT * FROM TableA A JOIN TableB B ON A.PrimaryKeyID = B.ForeignKeyID WHERE B.SomeParamColumn = @SomeParam
SELECT * FROM TableA A JOIN TableB B ON A.PrimaryKeyID = B.ForeignKeyID AND B.SomeParamColumn = @SomeParam
Both of these queries return the same result set, but the first query filters the results in the WHERE clause whereas the the second query filters the results in the JOIN criteria. Once upon a time a DBA told me that I should always use the syntax of the first query (WHERE clause). Is there any truth to this, and if so, why?
Hello, I am in the progress of designing a new section of my database and was thinking of creating a hole new database instead of just creating tables inside the database. My question is can you JOIN multiple tables in an SQL Statement from multiple databases. Ie, In the Management program I have a database called 'Convention' and another one called 'Services', inside the two databases there are many tables. Can I link say tblRegister from Convention to tblUser in Services? Thanks
select scheme.opheadm.order_no, scheme.porecpm.order_no, delivery_no, invoice_no, scheme.opheadm.customer, qty_received from scheme.opheadm join scheme.porecpm on (ltrim(rtrim(scheme.porecpm.commnt)) like (ltrim(rtrim(scheme.opheadm.order_no)) + '/%')) where effective_date between '2011-10-01 00:00:00.000' and '2011-10-08 00:00:00.000'
It gives me the 5 rows that I need to work with, one column is customer (which is giving me customer code) that I want to replace with customer name from another table
So I tried:
select scheme.opheadm.order_no, scheme.porecpm.order_no, delivery_no, invoice_no, scheme.jcmastm.name, qty_received from scheme.opheadm join scheme.porecpm on (ltrim(rtrim(scheme.porecpm.commnt)) like (ltrim(rtrim(scheme.opheadm.order_no)) + '/%')) join scheme.jcmastm on scheme.opheadm.customer = scheme.opheadm.customer here effective_date between '2011-10-01 00:00:00.000' and '2011-10-08 00:00:00.000'
this works with the same 5 rows that i need but loops them through every customer from the table scheme.jcmastm giving me a total of 960 rows not just the 5 that i want to work with. why this is looping?
hi i user this join and i have the answer like this"
select u.userid, u.user_name, u.password, c.code_description as role_code, convert(varchar, u.expiry_date,101) as expiry_date, u.created_date, u.active from [usermaster] u inner join [codeMaster] c on 'SP'=c.code where u.userid = '2'
select u.userid, u.user_name, u.password, c.code_description as role_code, convert(varchar, u.expiry_date,101) as expiry_date, u.created_date, u.active, v.user_date from [usermaster] u inner join [codeMaster] c inner join [HRUser_developerlog] v on 'SP'=c.code or u.userid=v.inserted_id and v.operation='delete' where u.userid = '2'
but i am getting error.can any onre please help me and please give me query please
I have two tables, let's say "Main" and "Dictionary".
The Main table has several fields that point to records in the same dictionary table. Because of the multiple joins I couldn't get any results if I use an expression like:
SELECT Main.ID, Dictionary.Text AS Data1, Dictionary.Text AS Data2
FROM Main, Dictionary
WHERE Main.Data1 = Dictionary.ID AND Main.Data2 = Dictionary.ID
What kind of join expression should I use? I have to generate this expression programmatically, so it's quite important to keep it as simple as possible!
An EMPLOYEE will always have at least 1 SKILL but each SKILL may or may not have any SKILLOPTIONS. I do an INNER JOIN:
EMPLOYEE->SKILL->SKILLOPTIONS but I only get a record if there is actually a SKILLOPTION. I want a record with EMPLOYEE and SKILL even if there are no SKILLOPTIONS. In Oracle it is the (+) symbol in the WHERE statement in conjunction with the JOIN. Am new to this so I'm sure the answer is simple.
I have three tables, Users, DocType and Docs. In the DocType table there are multiple entries for allowed document types, the descriptions and other pertinent data. In the Docs table, there are all manner of documents. In the User table are the users.
The DocType and Docs tables are relational. DocType.ID = Docs.tID The Users and Docs tables are relational. Users.ID = Docs.uID
Every user is allowed to have exactly one document of each type. Therefore if there are 10 document types in the DocType table, there may be as many as 10 matching documents in the Docs table.
What I need is a single record for each user returning a boolean for each document type, whether or not there is a matching record in the Docs table.
For example, there are 5 document types defined in the DocType table (types 1 - 5), so the DocType table has 5 rows. In the Docs table, there are 23 rows, and in the User table there are 10 rows. Given that each user may have only one of each DocType, there could be a maximum of 50 rows in the Docs table, but there are 23, meaning that on the average each user is missing one document.Now the challenge is to return a table of all the users (10 rows) with a boolean value for each of the rows in DocType (as columns) based on whether there is a value in the Docs table that matches both the DocType and User.
I have 3 tables , Customer , Sales Cost Charge and Sales Price , i have join the customer table to the sales price table with a left outer join into a new table.
i now need to join the data in the new table to sales cost charge. However please note that there is data that is in the sales price table that is not in the sales cost charge table and there is data in the sales cost charge table that is not in the sales price table ,but i need to get all the data. e.g. if on our application it shows 15 records , the sales price table will maybe have 7 records and the sales cost charge table will have 8 which makes it 15 records
I am struggling to match the records , i have also tried a left outer join to the sales cost charge table however i only get the 7 records which is in the sales price table. see code below
I'm trying to join 3 tables in an outer join since I am loosing records that need to be included if I only use an inner join. I am pulling data from an MSDE database using the microsoft query tool.
The problem is that I get the message that I can't use an outer join on a query with more than 2 tables, but that can't be right can it?
I'm a SQL code novice so any help would be greatly appreciated!
SELECT Article.articleId , Article.articleName , Article.articleStatus , Articlegroup_2.ArticlegroupId , Articlegroup_2.g2_key , Articlegroup_2.g2_name , articleGroup.articleGroupId FROM HIP.dbo.Article Article, HIP.dbo.articleGroup articleGroup, HIP.dbo.Articlegroup_2 Articlegroup_2 WHERE articleGroup.articleGroupId = Article.articleGroupId AND Article.articleGroupId2 = Articlegroup_2.Articlegroup_2_Id
I'm trying to join 2 tables in an outer join, but MS Query won't let me do this because I have another 2 tables included in an inner join ("only two tables are allowed in an outer join"). I am pulling data from an MSDE database using the microsoft query tool.
I'm a SQL code novice so any help would be greatly appreciated!
Here is my existing SQL query (without the new outer join table):
I am trying to pull in columns from multiple tables but am getting an error when I run the code:
Msg 4104, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
The multi-part identifier "a.BOC" could not be bound.
I am guessing that my syntax is completely off.
SELECT b.[PBCat] ,c.[VISN] --- I am trying to pull in the Column [VISN] from the Table [DIMSTA]. Current Status: --Failure ,a.[Station] ,a.[Facility] ,a.[CC] ,a.[Office]
create multiple INNER JOIN on derived tables as I have written below or use a #temp table for all derived tables and use them into JOIN. This below query is also very hard to understand what is going on .
This is so complicated (for me) because I usually only work with single table and simple queries (SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE), but now I am in a situation where I am stuck.
What I am trying to archive is that: when a project manager logged-into his/her account, a grid-view will show a quick overview for all of his/her projects (id, created date, name and how many files are in pending) like below picture:
3 tables will be involved are:
Sample data for manager_id = 11
I tried this query but it not worked, it seems to display all columns right but the COUNT pending files column (assume the manager_id = 11)
SELECT COUNT(file_id) as 'Pending files', projects.project_id, projects.project_name, projects.status, projects.start_date FROM ((project_manager INNER JOIN files ON project_manager.mag_id = files.manager_id AND project_manager.mag_id = 11 AND file_status = 'Pending') INNER JOIN projects ON projects.project_id = project_manager.project_id) GROUP BY projects.project_id, projects.project_name, projects.status, projects.start_date ORDER BY projects.status, projects.start_date DESC
I am trying to select specific columns from multiple tables based on acommon identifier found in each table.For example, the three tables:PUBACC_ACPUBACC_AMPUBACC_ANeach have a common column:PUBACC_AC.unique_system_identifierPUBACC_AM.unique_system_identifierPUBACC_AN.unique_system_identifierWhat I am trying to select, for example:PUBACC_AC.namePUBACC_AM.phone_numberPUBACC_AN.zipwhere the TABLE.unique_system_identifier is common.For example:----------------------------------------------PUBACC_AC=========unique_system_identifier name1234 JONES----------------------------------------------PUBACC_AM=========unique_system_identifier phone_number1234 555-1212----------------------------------------------PUBACC_AN=========unique_system_identifier zip1234 90210When I run my query, I would like to see the following returned as oneblob, rather than the separate tables:-------------------------------------------------------------------unique_system_identifier name phone_number zip1234 JONES 555-1212 90210-------------------------------------------------------------------I think this is an OUTER JOIN? I see examples on the net using a plussign, with mention of Oracle. I'm not running Oracle...I am usingMicrosoft SQL Server 2000.Help, please?P. S. Will this work with several tables? I actually have about 15tables in this mess, but I tried to keep it simple (!??!) for the aboveexample.Thanks in advance for your help!NOTE: TO REPLY VIA E-MAIL, PLEASE REMOVE THE "DELETE_THIS" FROM MY E-MAILADDRESS.Who actually BUYS the cr@p that the spammers advertise, anyhow???!!!(Rhetorical question only.)
I have to join two tables and i need to fetch All records from @tab2 and only max date record from @tab1 that ID is present in Tab2
1.) @Tab1 have multiple records for each ID
2.) @Tab2 also have multiple records for each ID
3.) Kind of Lef Outer join those tables with ID and take all records from @tab2 and only Max of date from @tab1 and order by ID and Date
Note: @Tab1 always have lesser dates than @tab2 for each ID
Tables looks like as follows
declare @tab1 table (id varchar(3), effDt Date, rate int) insert into @tab1 values ('101','2013-12-01',5) insert into @tab1 values ('101','2013-12-02',2) insert into @tab1 values ('101','2013-12-03',52)
[code]....
In the given ex, ID 103 should not come as it is not present in @tab2, ID 104 should come even it is not present in @tab1 as we ahve to use left outer join Result should like follows.
I have a sql query that I am using to populate a datagrid. The problem is one of the tables is a month table. and the other tables are full of data. So there is no common column name to match using a inner join "on".
I'm trying to run a SELECT on 3 tables: Class, Enrolled, Waiting. I want to select the name of the class, the count of the students enrolled, and the count of the students waiting to enroll.
My current query...
SELECT Class.Name, COUNT(Enrolled.StudentID) AS EnrolledCount, COUNT(Waiting.StudentID) AS WaitingCount FROM Class LEFT OUTER JOIN
Enrolled ON Class.ClassID = Enrolled.ClassID LEFT OUTER JOIN
Waiting ON Class.ClassID = Waiting.ClassID GROUP BY Class.Name
...results in identical counts for enrolled and waiting, which I know to be incorrect. Furthermore, it appears that the counts are being multiplied together (in one instance, enrolled should be 14, waiting should be 2, but both numbers come back as 28).
If I run this query without one of the joined tables, the counts are accurate. The problem only occurs when I try to pull counts from both the tables.
Can anyone find the problem with my query? Should I be using something other than a LEFT OUTER JOIN?
I have created a single FULLTEXT on col2 & col3. suppose i want to search col2='engine' and col3='toyota' i write query as
SELECT
TBL.col2,TBL.col3 FROM
TBL INNER JOIN
CONTAINSTABLE(TBL,col2,'engine') TBL1 ON
TBL.col1=TBL1.[key] INNER JOIN
CONTAINSTABLE(TBL,col3,'toyota') TBL2 ON
TBL.col1=TBL2.[key]
Every thing works well if database is small. But now i have 20 million records in my database. Taking an exmaple there are 5million record with col2='engine' and only 1 record with col3='toyota', it take substantial time to find 1 record.
I was thinking this i can address this issue if i merge both columns in a Single column, but i cannot figure out what format i save it in single column that i can use query to extract correct information. for e.g.; i was thinking to concatinate both fields like col4= ABengineBA + ABBToyotaBBA and in search i use SELECT
TBL.col4 FROM
TBL INNER JOIN
CONTAINSTABLE(TBL,col4,' "ABengineBA" AND "ABBToyotaBBA"') TBL1 ON
TBL.col1=TBL1.[key] Result = 1 row
But it don't work in following scenario col4= ABengineBA + ABBCorola ToyotaBBA
SELECT
TBL.col4 FROM
TBL INNER JOIN
CONTAINSTABLE(TBL,col4,' "ABengineBA" AND "ABB*ToyotaBBA"') TBL1 ON
TBL.col1=TBL1.[key]
Result=0 Row Any idea how i can write second query to get result?
I have a stored procedure which is used to search records in the database based on the data sent from the web page. There are several search fields and all of them are in one table (Table1) except the "CallerName" field which is in a different table (Table2). Since I had to show CallerName also in the gridview apart from other columns, I did a LEFT JOIN (using field CallerNumber) to show all the required fields from Table1 and CallerName from Table2. Now heres the problem. Since CallerName is a search criteria, its supposed to be in the WHERE clause after the JOIN or in the JOIN clause itself. The problem is, if I put it in WHERE clause, the result set doesn't show records from Table1 which do not have a matching CallerNumber in Table2. SELECT T1.CallerNumber, T1.DateCalled, T2.CallerName FROM Table1 T1 LEFT JOIN Table2 T2 on T1.CallerNumber = T2.CallerNumber WHERE T1.CallerNumber = 'some number' AND T2.CallerName = 'some name' If I put it in the JOIN condition, it works just like a LEFT JOIN is supposed to work, showing all the records in Table1 and also those which had CallerName in Table2. SELECT T1.CallerNumber, T1.DateCalled, T2.CallerName FROM Table1 T1 LEFT JOIN Table2 T2 on T1.CallerNumber = T2.CallerNumber AND T2.CallerName = 'some name' WHERE T1.CallerNumber = 'some number'
1st SQL won't work for me because it doesn't show all the records in Table1, even when no search criteria is specified.2nd SQL won't work for me because it shows more than required when just CallerName is sent from the web page as search criteria. It will show all the records where CallerName is "some name" and also all the additional records (since it is a left join). Can I get the goodness of both in one or do I have to create two separate Stored Procedures? Thanks all,Bullpit
I have a set of udf's dealing that return a one column table of valuesparsed from a comma delimeted string.For example:CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[udf_filter_patient](@patient_list varchar(2000))RETURNS @patient TABLE(patient_id int)ASBEGINinsert into @patientselect patient_id from patient-- parse @patient_list stuff excludedRETURNENDI have come up with the following two schemes to use these udfs. Theseexamples are obviously simplified, and I have a handful of stored proceduresthat will use between 10 or more of these filters. If the two areequivalent, I prefer Method 2 because it makes for much neater SQL whenusing many filter criteria.So my question is, will one noticebly outperform the other? Or is there abetter way in which to filter on a list of criteria?Method 1 :CREATE PROC sp__filter_open_bills@patient_list varchar(2000)ASCREATE TABLE #patient(patient_id int)INSERT INTO #patientSELECTpatient_idFROMdbo.udf_filter_patient( @patient_list )SELECT*FROMopen_billsINNER JOIN #patient on #patient.patient_id = open_bills.patient_idGOMethod 2 :CREATE PROC sp__filter_open_bills@patient_list varchar(2000)ASSELECT*FROMopen_billsWHEREopen_bills.patient_id IN ( SELECT patient_id FROMdbo.udf_filter_patient( @patient_list ) )GOThanks for the help!Chris G
That would be just the rows 1 6 3 0 2 6 1 0 2 5 3 0
If I use this:
Select CustomerId,PartNum, shipped, QtyInOrder AS MaxOrderedNotShipped from (SELECT [CustomerID] ,[PartNum] ,[QtyInOrder] ,shipped , row_number() over (partition by [CustomerID], PartNum order by QtyInOrder desc) as recid from [SILK].[dbo].[MaxofGroup]) as f where recid =1
there is no restriction, so I get the shipped...If I alter the where clause to work only on not shipped, I get no records...as below
Select CustomerId,PartNum, shipped, QtyInOrder AS MaxOrderedNotShipped from (SELECT [CustomerID] ,[PartNum] ,[QtyInOrder] ,shipped , row_number() over (partition by [CustomerID], PartNum order by QtyInOrder desc) as recid from [SILK].[dbo].[MaxofGroup]) as f where recid =1 and shipped=0
I am creating a .aspx page that links with Miscrosoft SQL Server 2005 Express. It includes a GridView control that displays all the table data on the page. You can then select a record from the control (currently by clicking an image button to the left of each record- is there any way of selecting the record by clicking anywhere on the row? How would that be done?) and it displays the data in a detailsview control below where the data can be changed etc. The data is like a phonebook (Name, Telephone number, and some other misc fields) and the user should be able to search by either name or number to filter out the records shown in the gridview control. I have two textboxes for this, and I started with the name text box and it works fine. i.e. with one filterparameter and one filterexpression. So that if you just enter 'Da' it filters out the records displaying only those whose name starts with 'Da'. I have experimented but have found no way of including filter expressions to use the number as a search. I added the second filter parameter (under sqldatasource control so that: <FilterParameters> <asp:ControlParameter Name="DestinationName" ControlID="txtName" /><asp:ControlParameter Name="DestinationNumber" ControlID="txtNumber" /> </FilterParameters> But I don't know what to do for the FilterExpressions. currently I just have: FilterExpression="DestinationName LIKE '{0}%'" i have tried using "DestinationName LIKE '{0}%' OR DestinationNumber LIKE '{0}%'" but it requires that both text boxes have data entered.
What I want is something that allows the user to enter either a name or number or both (all or part of so don't need to enter in full name/number) and it filters out the records accordingly. I.e. if you enterd 'Dav' and '079' it would bring back all the records who had a name starting with Dav and a number starting with 079. However if you enterd just 079 then it should just bring back all records with numbers starting 079 whatever their associated name.
I have a table with a record that looks like the attached TXT.
I need to keep the most recently entered value where flag_out = 1 and delete those duplicate records, and this should only apply to records where there's also an flag_in value of 1.
I've tried a bunch of delete statements without avail....
How can you handle multiple criteria query in T-SQL ? i wrote selection query and in my where clause i have about 7 different criteria and for some reason when i run the query i do not get any error but i do not get any data return.
So is there any other way to handle multiple criteria in T-SQL ?
Im sorry if this has been covered, I tried a search but I couldnt seem to find what I was after.
Anyway, I need an Update procedure which is actually several bunched into one. Ive had a stab at it myself, and perhaps my pseudo SQL might explain what I need..
Code Block UPDATE [TW].[dbo].[TBLSalesPart] SET
CASE WHEN [Part] = 'MONTV-' AND [YN] = 'False' THEN [SubCategory] = 20440 END CASE WHEN [Part] = 'TC-' AND [YN] = 'False' THEN [SubCategory] = 20444 END
Hi. I have this method in a class, it produces a string value based on the value of another property in the object (which represents a field in the database). I would like to turn this into a computed column in SQL server... but need help converting the formula if this is even possible. Thanks in advance.public string GetVendorEvalRating(int vendorevaltotal) { string vendorevalrating = "";if (vendorevaltotal >= 26) {vendorevalrating = "Critical"; }else if ((vendorevaltotal >= 10) && (vendorevaltotal <= 25)) {vendorevalrating = "Material"; }else if ((vendorevaltotal >= 0) && (vendorevaltotal <= 9)) {vendorevalrating = "Minor"; }return vendorevalrating; }
I am working on SQL Server in VB 2008. I have a table 'Records' having 8 columns. I have a search page where I can choose 5 different parameters to search as 'Category' , 'Name' , 'Date' etc.
I can successfully search with a single criteria selected either Category Name Or Date. But I want to create a single SQL command that can search my 'Records' table for either two or all the parameters depending on the selections made by the user.
where content like '%EditLiveJava%' or content like '% Sys__%' ESCAPE '_' or content like '%<div class="row"/>%' or content like '%<a href="" title=""%' or content like '%cmsprod%' or content like '%Error processing inline link%' or content like '%see log for stack trace%'
I output the content field if the search is true but would like to also output which specific 'like' has been found.
Can I do this in the one pass or do I have to read the database separately for each condition?
