Joins Vs Where Clause - Performance Query
Dec 5, 2006
Hi There !!
To finetune performance for some of our queries,
I have come across suggestions to use
- JOINS instead of WHERE clause wherever possible
- and avoid using Aliases
Although Avoiding aliases looks reasonable I am yet to be convinced about JOINS replacing the WHERE CLAUSE . What is the experts take on this one ????
Also,
I checked the estimated plan in SQL server by running the following 2 queries into my Query Designer
tables : dba ( empid, empname )
project ( project_empid references dba.empid, project_name )
USING A WHERE CLAUSE and Alias
-------------------------
select a.emp_name from dbo.dba a, dbo.project b
where
a.empid =b.project_emp
and b.project_name is not null
USING A JOIN
-----------------
select emp_name from dbo.dba
as
a inner JOIN dbo.project
ON empid = dbo.project.project_emp
AND dbo.project.project_name is not NULL
******
I find from the Estimated plan that both the queries give the same amount of cost ( I/O, CPU, et all ) :shocked:
Any comments/ suggestions.
Thanks,
Have a great time
-Ranjit.
-------------------------------------
It pays to be honest to your DBA
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 20, 2005
Hi all,Just wondering if anyone can tell me if an order by clause on a selectquery would have any impact on the time it takes to retrieve results?Essentially I'm selecting Top 1 out of a table via various criteriaand currently getting it back without an order by clause. The order bywould only include the column that has the clustered primary index onit.Can anyone tell me if in theory this will slow the query down?Many thanks in advance!Much warmth,Murrau
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Does the order in which Joins are peformed (from left to right) matterwhether inner or outer when it comes to performance. Assuming that allindexes are the same but the size of the tables is different?For example let's assume we have 5 tables, TABLE1, TABLE2, TABLE3,TABLE4, TABLE5.For example:SELECT Smth from TABLE1 INNER JOIN TABLE2 on Condition1INNER JOIN TABLE3 on Condition2LEFT JOIN TABLE4 on Condition3INNER JOIN TABLE5 on Condition4.Does SQL optimize the query and finds the best way to inner join or itstarts doing the JOINS from left to right?Thank you for your your feedback.Gent
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2003
Other than being much less readable, is there a downside to combining left and right outer joins in the same SELECT? I'm reviewing some generally poor code done by a contractor and it's peppered with queries with both left and right joins. I've always thought it was just a semantic difference, but I was just wondering if, other than readability, there were any performance issues.
Thanks,
Pete
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2006
The code below is from a nested view, which I've read should be avoided. I've also noticed GETDATE() is used, which I believe causes GETDATE() to be executed for every record selected (correct me if I'm wrong). I'm also guessing a JOIN containing a UNION against a SELECT statement is not a good idea. What other problems do you notice?
SELECT trans.Entry_Code, trans.D_C, trans.ADP_Security_# ,
trans.TRID, trans.Batch_Code, trans.Last_Money,
null as Shares, Settle_date as Process_Date,
null as Closing_Price, trans.Dwnld_Date, trans.Acnt,
null as Mktval,
cast(Null as varchar(20)) as Cusip_#,
ACT.dbo.account.account_key AS account_key
FROM (SELECT * FROM ADPDBBOOK.dbo.YTD05B
WHERE (DATEDIFF(mm, Process_Date, GETDATE()) <= 15)
UNION
SELECT * FROM ADPDBBOOK.dbo.YTD06B) trans
INNER JOIN ACT_DATA.dbo.account
ON ACT_DATA.dbo.account.account_key = RIGHT(trans.Acnt, 5)
INNER JOIN tbl_Accounts_TransactionalData
ON trans.Acnt = tbl_Accounts_TransactionalData.Acnt
Thanks, Dave
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2014
I had a pretty simple query like
select * from table_A
where email in (select email from table_B)
or
email not in (select email from table_c)
It ran for a very long time.
But if I ran the select with either of the conditions by itself it took just a second. Combining both conditions really slowed it down.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2007
I have recently started working with a new group of people and I find myself doing a lot of reporting. While doing this reporting I have been writing a TON of sql. Some of my queries were not performing up to par and another developer in the shop recommended that I stay away from the "GROUP BY" clause.
Backing away from the "GROUP BY" clause and using "INNER SELECTS" instead as been more effective and some queries have gone from over 1 minute to less that 1 second.
Obviously if it works then it works and there is no arguing that point. My question to the forum is more about gather some opinions so that I can build an opinion of my own.
If I cannot do a reasonable query of a couple of million records using a group by clause what is the problem and what is the best fix?
Is the best fix to remove the "GROUP BY" and write a query that is a little more complex or should I be looking at tuning the database with more indexes and statistics?
I want to make sure that this one point is crystal clear. I am not against following the advice of my coworker and avoiding the "GROUP BY" clause. I am only intersted in listening to a few others talk about why the agree or disagree with my coworked so that I can gain a broader understanding.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2008
Consider the following two functionally identical example queries:Query 1:DECLARE @Name VARCHAR(32)SET @Name = 'Bob'SELECT * FROM EmployeesWHERE [Name] = CASE WHEN @Name IS NULL THEN [Name] ELSE @Name ENDQuery 2:SELECT * FROM Employees WHERE [Name] = 'Bob'I would expect SQL Server to construct an identical QEP under the hoodfor these two queries, and that they would require essentially thesame amount of time to execute. However, Query 1 takes much longer torun on my indexed table of ~300,000 rows. By "longer", I mean thatQuery 1 takes about two seconds, while Query 2 returns almostinstantly.Is there a way to implement a conditional WHERE clause withoutsuffering this performance hit? I want to avoid using the IF...THENmethod because I frequently require several optional parameters in theWHERE clause.Thanks!Jared
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 28, 2007
Everything is flowing smoothly for the SQL Server Database I have, except one type of retrieval and that is when the where clause has a range of data values to do the retrieval then the performance is terrible. I cannot anticipate every range. There are indexes on the table to try to help; however, nothing seems to help. Has anyone had a similiar problem? Any suggestions to improve performance?
Thanks, Mary
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 17, 2007
Hi!
I have just installed Microsoft OLEDB provider for DB2 on a SQL server 2005. I created a Linked server against our DB2 V.8 Z/OS database. I tested the connection via execution of a simple select call, something like:
SELECT FIELD_A FROM DB2SRV.DB2DB.CREATOR_A.TABLE_A
WHERE FIELD_A='ABC'
I traced the call on the DB2 site. The SQL running on DB2 site was to my surprise without the €œwhere clause€?:
SELECT FIELD_A FROM DB2DB.CREATOR_A.TABLE_A
So, all rows are moved to SQL server before the where clause is executed, resulting in bad performance. The index on FIELD_A is not used and so on €¦ !
If anyone out there has an idea of what could be wrong, please let me know!
NB. I know that by using OPENQUERY pass-through query, all execution is done on the DB2 site.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 23, 2006
Hello Everyone,I have a very complex performance issue with our production database.Here's the scenario. We have a production webserver server and adevelopment web server. Both are running SQL Server 2000.I encounted various performance issues with the production server with aparticular query. It would take approximately 22 seconds to return 100rows, thats about 0.22 seconds per row. Note: I ran the query in singleuser mode. So I tested the query on the Development server by taking abackup (.dmp) of the database and moving it onto the dev server. I ranthe same query and found that it ran in less than a second.I took a look at the query execution plan and I found that they we'rethe exact same in both cases.Then I took a look at the various index's, and again I found nodifferences in the table indices.If both databases are identical, I'm assumeing that the issue is relatedto some external hardware issue like: disk space, memory etc. Or couldit be OS software related issues, like service packs, SQL Serverconfiguations etc.Here's what I've done to rule out some obvious hardware issues on theprod server:1. Moved all extraneous files to a secondary harddrive to free up spaceon the primary harddrive. There is 55gb's of free space on the disk.2. Applied SQL Server SP4 service packs3. Defragmented the primary harddrive4. Applied all Windows Server 2003 updatesHere is the prod servers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.67GHZTotal Physical Memory 2GB, Available Physical Memory 815MBWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1Here is the dev serers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.80GHz2GB DDR2-SDRAMWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1I'm not sure what else to do, the query performance is an order ofmagnitude difference and I can't explain it. To me its is a hardware oroperating system related issue.Any Ideas would help me greatly!Thanks,Brian T*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2007
Hi all,Just after some help with a query (Stored Procedure) I've managed to get wrapped round my head.The DB is as such:
COMPANY
Company_id
Company_name
COMPANY_GROUP
Group_id
Group_name
USER
User_id
User_name
Bridging tables
COMPANY_GROUP_BRIDGE
company_id
group_id
USER_COMPANY_BRIDGE
user_id
company_id Basically, the only parameter I have for the query is a User_id.I need to get the Group linked to the User and return all the companies within that group. I've
tried reading up on all the join types again but have just got this
completely wrapped round my neck. I keep thinking along the lines of
SELECT all the companies linked to all the groups linked to all the
companies linked to the User_id :s I must be able to do
this without using two Company tables...?
Any help much appreciated,Pete
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 25, 2008
I have
Categories table with CategoryID, Title, CategoryParentID columns
Questions table with QuestionID, Text columns
CategoriesQuestions table with CategoryID, QuestionID columns
Now I want to make the query which takes QuestionID and return all Categories of that provided QuestionID.
I already have made that query in 2 different styles.
First I make an Inner Join to retrieve the results
Select Categories.* from Categories Inner Join CategoriesQuestiosn on Categories.CategoryID = CategoriesQuestions.CategoryID where CategoriesQuestions.QuestionID = 1
Second I make a sub query to retrive the results.
Select * from Categories where CategoryID In (Select CategoryID From CategoriesQuestions where QuestionID = 1)
Now I am asking what is the better one in respect to performance.
And please provide any other query if you have.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2014
Iwrote a query right, and need to get further information out of another table, so did a Join, but then also need to get further information out of another table..So, I need to add this query:
SELECT PERSONNUM as EmployeeCode
,[FIRSTNM] as Firstname
,[LASTNM] as LastName
,[HOMELABORLEVELDSC1] as Site
,[HOMELABORLEVELNM1] as SiteID
FROM [tkcsdb].[dbo].[VP_ALLPERSONV42]where USERACCOUNTSTATUS = 'active'
and homelaborlevelnm1 in ('11', '13', '32')
order by SiteID, LastName
To be included in this query:
SELECTa.PERSONNUM,
a.PERSONFULLNAME,
HOMELABORLEVELDSC1,
[SERVER]
[code]...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2008
I have the following:
select
ad.bank,ad.account_number,ad.account_short_name,
p.security_id,isnull(b.NAME,isnull(tw.name,ms.name)) as SecurityDescription,
p.security_price,mc.classcode,
sum(case
when p.security_price = 9999999.99900 then 0
when mc.classcode between '000'and'299' then (p.quantity * p.security_price) / 100
when mc.classcode between '950'and'999' then (p.security_price * p.quantity) * -1
when mc.classcode between '300' and '324' or mc.classcode between '330' and '399'then p.acm_ctf_mtf_price * p.quantity
when p.security_price = '0' then p.cost
else
(p.security_price * p.quantity)
end) as MV,p.position_date,p.quantity,p.cost,p.acm_ctf_mtf_price
from positions p
left join BloombergEquityData b on p.security_id = b.ID_CUSIP
left join account_detail ad on p.account_id = ad.account_id
left join metavanteclasscodes mc on p.security_id = mc.cusip
left join MacgregorSecurityMaster ms on p.security_id = ms.cusip
left join TobaSecurityWarehouse tw on p.security_id = tw.cusip
where p.position_date = '03/05/2008' and
((ad.investment_authority_id in ('2','3') and ad.bank in ('98','7R')) or ad.bank = '9W')-- and ad.account_number = '41G006012'
group byad.account_number,ad.account_short_name,p.security_id,
ms.name,b.NAME,p.security_price,p.position_date,ad.bank,mc.classcode,p.quantity,p.cost,p.acm_ctf_mtf_price,isnull(b.NAME,isnull(tw.name,ms.name))
order by ad.account_number,p.security_id
For a given day, in this example 3/5 if I were to just select all the records I would get back around 550,000. If I put the filter on where I tell it to just show me one account its snappy. If I remove that filter and have it show me all the accounts it take forever. Here is the layout of my positions table where i am pulling the majority of the information:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[positions](
[account_id] [int] NOT NULL,
[security_id] [varchar](50) NOT NULL,
[position_date] [smalldatetime] NOT NULL,
[quantity] [decimal](18, 5) NOT NULL,
[cost] [decimal](18, 5) NULL,
[security_price] [decimal](18, 5) NULL,
[acm_ctf_mtf_price] [decimal](18, 9) NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_positions] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[account_id] ASC,
[position_date] ASC,
[security_id] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
My questions is if you can identify any reason why the query might take more than 10 minutes (actually still running after 10 minutes) to complete when I have it bring me back all the records, not sure if its a lack of indexes or what, but was hoping for some suggestions on what I might be missing. I apologize if I havent included enough information, still learning how to troubleshoot the performance side of things.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2006
Not sure if this is right place to ask but here is our problem. We are getting records from more than one table. Table1 and Table2 for example Both Tables haveid, value table11, 201, 30 Table 21, 501, 40 here is the queryselect table1.id, table1.value, table2.value from Table1inner join Table2on Table1.id = table2.idproblem is this returns 4 rows like this1, 20 , 501, 30 , 501, 20 , 401, 30 , 40 When we need it to return1, 20 , null1, 30, null1, null, 401, null , 50 any help on this would be appreciated.Thank You in advance.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2008
Hi all.I want to use the following query in a sp to enable paging using ObjectDataSource.The problem (being EXTREMELEY slow) arises when I add these joins and where statements.
SELECT r.RID AS ReqID, r.Name AS ReqName, r.Family AS ReqFamily,t3.Name AS DistName, t4.Name AS RurName,t5.Name AS VilName, n.Name+' '+n.Family AS NazerName ,ROW_NUMBER() over (order by r.Family) AS RowRankFROM Requests rLEFT OUTER JOIN Nazeran n ON r.nazerID = n.ID LEFT OUTER JOIN t1States t1 ON t1.ID = r.StateID LEFT OUTER JOIN t2Provinces t2 ON t1.ID = t2.StateID AND r.ProvID = t2.ID LEFT OUTER JOIN t3Districts t3 ON t2.ID = t3.provID AND t1.ID = t3.stateID AND r.DistID = t3.ID LEFT OUTER JOIN t4RuralDistricts t4 ON t3.ID = t4.distID AND t2.ID = t4.provID AND t1.ID = t4.stateID AND r.RurID = t4.ID LEFT OUTER JOIN t5Villages t5 ON t4.ID = t5.rurID AND t3.ID = t5.distID AND t2.ID = t5.provID AND t1.ID = t5.stateID AND r.VilID = t5.IDWHERE r.stateid=(case when @StateID is null or @StateID='' then r.stateid else @StateID end) and r.provid=(case when @provID is null or @provID='' then r.provid else @provID end) and r.rID=(case when @ReqID is null or @ReqID='' then r.rID else @ReqID end) and isnull(r.nazerID,'')=(case when @nazerID is null or @nazerID='' then isnull(r.nazerID,'') else @nazerID end) and r.name+' '+r.family like (case when @ReqName is null or @ReqName='' then r.name+' '+r.family else '%'+@ReqName+'%' end)
**there are 1million rows in [Requests] table ,200000 rows in [t5villages], and about total 5000 rows in other tables.As you can see, this is for a GridView showing list of people requesting a loan allowing users to make alternative searches based on Name, Familyname ,ID ,...
would you please help me optimize and make fast this query.Many thanks..
View 13 Replies
View Related
Oct 5, 2003
I wrote a SQL query that firstly do an outer-join for two table and after I add another
table with outer-join as well.
I'm getting the following message:
Server: Msg 301, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Query contains an outer-join request that is not permitted.
May be someone knows what is it?
If I remove the second join- it work....
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2008
Ok I have a complex query that works great, but now I need to join yet another table but the problem is, the value that links it to the rest of the query is a value that is returned from a case statement earlier in the query...
For Example...
SELECT var1, var2, var3,
CASE T1.Number WHEN 0 THEN T2.Result ELSE T3.Result END as var4
FROM TABLE1 T1
LEFT OUTER JOIN TABLE2 T2 on T2.Value=T1.Value
LEFT OUTER JOIN TABLE3 T3 on T3.Value=T1.Value2
Above is a generalized, much smaller example of my working Query.
Now what I need to do is join TABLE4 but the value I need to connect it to the rest of the query is var4, which can come from 2 different places depending on the value of T1.Number
Basically the logic I need to make it work is to either have a case statement in my JOIN. Like, 'LEFT OUTER JOIN TABLE4 on T4.Value=(CASE T1.Number WHEN 0 THEN T2.Result ELSE T3.Result END)'
Is this even possible and if so, how? I need to keep the logic in the main query to preserve performance...
Thank you in advance,
Casey
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2008
My tables and data as follows
AB_Corporate_Project
Fields are : ab_crp_id , cust_name , owner_rep_id
Data in table AB_Corporate_Project is as follows
ab_crp_id cust_name owner_rep_id
1 harry 3
2 msas 2
AB_Plant_Project
Fields are : ab_plant_id , ab_name , owner_rep_id
Data in Table AB_Plant_Project
ab_plant_id ab_name owner_rep_id
1 abc 1
2 def 2
Other_Project
Fields are : other_proj_id,ot_name, owner_rep_id
Data in table Other_Project
other_proj_id ot_name owner_rep_id
1 xyz 2
2 cdf 3
Owner_Rep
Fields are : owner_rep_id,owner_name
Data in Table Owner_Rep
owner_rep_id owner_name
1 henry
2 hologa
3 tmw
Daily_Time_Entry
Fields are: dl_id,dt_id,project_type,project_id,time_st
Data in table Daily_Time_Entry
dl_id dt_id project_type project_id time_st
1 03/23/08 AB Corporate 1 1.20
2 03/23/08 AB Corporate 2 3.25
3 03/21/08 AB Corporate 1 2.25
4 03/23/08 AB Plant 1 4.35
5 03/23/08 AB Plant 2 4.50
6 03/23/08 Other Project 1 3.24
7 03/23/08 Other Project 2 4.35
I want to show records as per date from Daily_Time_Entry table and detail data to be displayed as follows
dl_id dt_id project_type project_id time_st exp1 exp2 exp3 owner_name
1 03/23/08 AB Corporate 1 1.20 3 -- -- tmw
2 03/23/08 AB Corporate 2 3.25 2 -- -- hologa
3 03/21/08 AB Corporate 1 2.25 3 -- -- tmw
4 03/23/08 AB Plant 1 4.35 -- 1 -- henry
5 03/23/08 AB Plant 2 4.50 -- 2 -- hologa
6 03/23/08 Other Project 1 3.24 -- -- 2 hologa
7 03/23/08 Other Project 2 4.35 -- -- 3 tmw
Also in project_type AB Corporate for AB_Corporate_Project, AB Plant for AB_Plant_Project , Other Project for Other_Project
I write query for this is as follows
Select dl. dl_id,dl.dt_id,dl.project_type,dl. project_id,dl.time_st,ac.owner_rep_id as exp1,ab. owner_rep_id as exp2,op. owner_rep_id as exp3,ow. owner_name
From Daily_Time_Entry dl left outer join
AB_Corporate_Project ac on dl. project_id = ac. ab_crp_id and dl. project_type=’ AB Corporate’ left outer join AB_Plant_Project ab on dl. project_id =ab. ab_plant_id and
dl. project_type=’ AB Plant’ left outer join Other_Project op on dl. project_id = op. other_proj_id and dl. project_type=’ Other Project’ inner join Owner_Rep ow on
(ow. owner_rep_id = ac. owner_rep_id) or(ow. owner_rep_id = ab. owner_rep_id)or
(ow. owner_rep_id = op.owner_rep_id)
So how can I write query to show output as follows or any other way or how to create Sql cursors for to show output
Plz help to solve this query to show output as specified.
uday
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Hi all,I have the following tables:A1==HostID Name RunID------ ---- -----1 host1 NULL2 host2 13 host3 NULLA2==RunID SessionID----- ---------1 42 2A3==SessionID Name--------- ----4 Session12 Session3I want to show every record from A1 with SessionName from A3, unlessthe field RunID in A1 is NULL and then I want to see NULL, like this:HostID Name RunID Name------ ---- ----- ----1 host1 NULL NULL2 host2 1 Session13 host3 NULL NULLwhen I try the following query:select A1.*, A3.Namefrom A1, A2, A3where A1.RunId *= A2.RunId and A2.SessionID = A3.SessionIDI get the following error:The table 'A2' is an inner member of an outer-join clause. This is notallowed if the table also participates in a regular join clause.How can I overcome this problem. Please help. (I use this syntax isteadof joins since I have to supprt also Oracle DB and this syntax issimpler to translate).Thanks in advance,Yaron
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Hi,I have a view(A) and I am trying to do a join on another table (B) toinclude only rows where date values in view A is greater than in tableB. I also want the view to pick up rows in viewA based on date values.Here is what I have so far:SELECT *FROM viewA vwleft JOIN tableB tb ONvw.id = tb.id and(vw.date1 > tb.date1 orvw.date2 > tb.date2 orvw.date3 > tb.date3)WHERE vw.date4 > getdate()-1Not matter what kind of join I use I can get both the rows from theview where dateA > getdate()-1 AND where date1-3 are greate than intableB. Dates 1 - 4 seperate date fields. Could someone please tellme what I am doing wrong.Thanks.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2006
HelloLet me explain the problem I am having:I have two tables, data_t and a_data_ta_data_t is the archive table of data_tThe two tables are exactly the same.In the table values are stored:Value (A numeric value)Code (A text code to identify a report with data)Line (The line number)Col (The Col Number)EDate (The date of entry)Grp (A number of a group the data belongs to)I want to get the value from data_t minus the value from a_data_t withthe same Code, Line and Col but with a different EDate (To view thevariance).Here is my statement:select d1.line, d1.col, (IsNull(d1.value,0) - IsNull(d2.value,0)) asvalue from data_t d1full outer join a_data_t d2 on d1.Code = d2.Code and d2.line = d2.lineand d1.col = d2.colwhered1.Code = 'XC001' and d1.line between 1 and 20 and d1.grp = 26and d1.EDate = '2006/06' and d2.grp = 26 and d2.EDate = '2006/05'order by d1.line, d1.colIt works fine EXCEPT when there is a value in either of the tables thatisn't in the other one, then a value is not given.Example:data_t doens't have a value for line=1 and col=2 and grp=26 and Code ='XC001' and EDate = '2006/06'a_data_t has the value of 50000 for the same details (Except Edate of'2006/5')Instead of returning -50000 it doesn't return anything.I hope I could explain it correctly.Any help will be greatly appreciated.Thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2008
My tables and data as follows
AB_Corporate_Project
Fields are : ab_crp_id , cust_name , owner_rep_id
Data in table AB_Corporate_Project is as follows
ab_crp_id cust_name owner_rep_id
1 harry 3
2 msas 2
AB_Plant_Project
Fields are : ab_plant_id , ab_name , owner_rep_id
Data in Table AB_Plant_Project
ab_plant_id ab_name owner_rep_id
1 abc 1
2 def 2
Other_Project
Fields are : other_proj_id,ot_name, owner_rep_id
Data in table Other_Project
other_proj_id ot_name owner_rep_id
1 xyz 2
2 cdf 3
Owner_Rep
Fields are : owner_rep_id,owner_name
Data in Table Owner_Rep
owner_rep_id owner_name
1 henry
2 hologa
3 tmw
Daily_Time_Entry
Fields are: dl_id,dt_id,project_type,project_id,time_st
Data in table Daily_Time_Entry
dl_id dt_id project_type project_id time_st
1 03/23/08 AB Corporate 1 1.20
2 03/23/08 AB Corporate 2 3.25
3 03/21/08 AB Corporate 1 2.25
4 03/23/08 AB Plant 1 4.35
5 03/23/08 AB Plant 2 4.50
6 03/23/08 Other Project 1 3.24
7 03/23/08 Other Project 2 4.35
I want to show records as per date from Daily_Time_Entry table and detail data to be displayed as follows
dl_id dt_id project_type project_id time_st exp1 exp2 exp3 owner_name
1 03/23/08 AB Corporate 1 1.20 3 -- -- tmw
2 03/23/08 AB Corporate 2 3.25 2 -- -- hologa
3 03/21/08 AB Corporate 1 2.25 3 -- -- tmw
4 03/23/08 AB Plant 1 4.35 -- 1 -- henry
5 03/23/08 AB Plant 2 4.50 -- 2 -- hologa
6 03/23/08 Other Project 1 3.24 -- -- 2 hologa
7 03/23/08 Other Project 2 4.35 -- -- 3 tmw
Also in project_type AB Corporate for AB_Corporate_Project, AB Plant for AB_Plant_Project , Other Project for Other_Project
I write query for this is as follows
Select dl. dl_id,dl.dt_id,dl.project_type,dl. project_id,dl.time_st,ac.owner_rep_id as exp1,ab. owner_rep_id as exp2,op. owner_rep_id as exp3,ow. owner_name
From Daily_Time_Entry dl left outer join
AB_Corporate_Project ac on dl. project_id = ac. ab_crp_id and dl. project_type=€™ AB Corporate€™ left outer join AB_Plant_Project ab on dl. project_id =ab. ab_plant_id and
dl. project_type=€™ AB Plant€™ left outer join Other_Project op on dl. project_id = op. other_proj_id and dl. project_type=€™ Other Project€™ inner join Owner_Rep ow on
(ow. owner_rep_id = ac. owner_rep_id) or(ow. owner_rep_id = ab. owner_rep_id)or
(ow. owner_rep_id = op.owner_rep_id)
So how can I write query to show output as follows or any other way or how to create Sql cursors for to show output
Plz help to solve this query to show output as specified.
<!--[endif]-->
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 19, 2007
Hello....
i have 4 tables in a databse(tab1,tab2,tab3,tab4). id is the attribute of TAB1 and id also foreign key of all the tables.....That mean id attribute exists on all the tables........so when i want to query to more than 1 table , i have to go for Joins...basically i am using innerjoin.........
Can u tell me is there any other way to find the same output as the innerjoin......without using the keyword INNER JOIN
for example ......SELECT * FROM TAB1 INNER JOIN (TAB2 INNERJOIN TAB3 ON TAB2.ID=TAB3.ID) ON TAB1.ID=TAB2.ID
another query........
SELECT *FROM TAB1,TAB2,TAB3 WHERE (TAB1.ID=TAB2.ID) AND (TAB2.ID=TAB3.ID) AND (TAB3.ID=TAB1.ID)
above queries are same or not??????????
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2007
I have a single table named PROCESS which contain following three fields
ProcessID
ParentID,
info
* Every process have a unique ProcessID and ave single parent process which is identified by ParentID.
* If a process does not have a Parent then its ParentID value is -1.
*Only single level of Parent-child hierarchy is maintained.
Can anyone please tell me the Query that uses Recursive JOINS to retrieve the ProcessID s based in following Conditions.
1. if the Parent's 'info' field contains given value then retrieve all the process under it.
2. Retrive all the process whose 'info' contains given value and excluding the Processes resulted from 1st conditiion
Thanks in advance
Bharath Booshan L
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I have a couple of tables that look like this (not excactly but closeenough):[Contact]id intfname varchar(50)lname varchar(50)[ContactPhoneNumber]id intnumber varchar(15)ext varchar(6)contact_id intpriority int (indicates primary, secondary... numbers)type int (indicates type of number: fax, cell, land line)I'm looking for a more optimized method of displaying this informationin this format:fname, primary business phoneUsing a derived column like this works, but seems to be slow with manyrecords, despite tuning indexes:SELECT c.fname AS [First Name],( SELECT TOP 1numberFROM ContactPhoneNumber cpnWHERE cpn.type = 1AND cpn.contact_id = c.idORDER BY cpn.priority) AS NumberFROM Contact cI can get the same results using a join, and it's a lot faster. But I'mnot sure how to select only the primary phone number this way...basically the first phone number whose priority is either NULL or 1.Any suggestions?*** Sent via Devdex http://www.devdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 21, 2007
Hello,
I have a query with 11 left joins. Some hits against tables with small amounts of reference data, whereas others are not so small. Should I rewrite this in another way, as performance is a requirement on this one? Or, should I do it another way?
How would I rewrite left joins? Any examples?
Thanks.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 15, 2006
How to find maximum value from two tables have the same field name?
For example:
Table -1 has field calcuated_price and its max value is 3500 and then Table -2 has
same field name calcuated_price has max value is 3000.
Nishith
View 9 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2007
Hi All,
Please suggest me is there any performance/other differences between the below two queries.
----query1
select T1.name,T1.Number, T2.Dept, T2.Desig
From T1 Inner Join T2 on T1.EID = T2.EID
----query2
select T1.name,T1.Number, T2.Dept, T2.Desig
From T1 Inner Join (Select Dept, Desig From T2) As T2 on T1.EID = T2.EID
Thanks
Senthil
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2006
I would like to populate a grid with data from 2 different tables.
Table1: [PK]id(int), name(nvarchar), areaID(int)
Table2: [PK][FK]areaID(int), areaDescription(nvarchar)
My cerrent query is:
SELECT Table1.id, Table1.name, Table2.areaDescription FROM Table1 INNER JOIN Table2 ON Table1.areaID = Table2.areaID
However, sometimes the areaID in Table1 will only be populated at a later stage and therefore will be NULL in Table1. Table2 is used as a lookup table when inserting into Table1. This query therefore ommits any records in Table1 which do not have an areaID. I would like to view ALL records(ones without an areaID as well) as they would be populated in the grid and selected to be updated on web forms because they are incomplete and then subsequently assigned an areaID.
Any help with this query would be much appreciated...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2012
I'm trying to write a 3 table query using two LEFT JOINs. Originally, I only had one LEFT JOIN and prior to the addition of the the third table (parts) this query worked. Now it doesn't. I think it has to do with my GROUP BY.
SELECT
quote.quote_id, parts.material, machining_operations.machine, machining_operations.per_roughing, machining_operations.per_of_machining,
machining_operations.programming_time, machining_operations.setup_time, machining_operations.cycle_time, machining_operations.notes
quote.part_name, quote.revision_no, quote.quantity, quote.initial_volume, quote.final_volume, quote.material_price, machining_operations.mo_id
FROM quote
LEFT JOIN machining_operations
ON machining_operations.quote_num = quote.quote_id
LEFT JOIN parts
ON parts.package_no = quote.package_no AND parts.part_name = quote.part_name
GROUP BY quote.quote_id
View 10 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2013
I have select query with 10 Joins in place with different i want to improve the performance of the query how do i join tables with out joins.
View 9 Replies
View Related