We are trying to limit are query that returns items from our database. The
query currently returns 32,000 records. We are trying to figure out an effecient way so we can request the 1st 50, or the 3rd 50, or the 5th 50 to display to the screen. We dont want to return the entire 32,000 then limit whats displayed to the screen in ADO. We want the select statment to only return 50 at a time. Any suggestions?
I am trying to write a query that gives me the personal records from speed skaters on e.g. the 500 mtrs. I do this with the query:
SELECT cdsDistance AS Distance
, prsFirstName
, prsLastName
, min(crtFinalTime) AS MinTime
FROM tb....... INNER JOIN etc..
GROUP BY cdsDistance, prsFirstName, prsLastName
ORDER BY min(crtFinalTime)
In itself this works fine. However, there are complicating factors. Sometimes a speed skater has multiple PRs, meaning the he/she has the same fastest time more than once.
If these times are achieved on multple days, the 1st date is the official PR. (meaning: "Min of racedate")
If they are raced on the same day the 1st race is the PR (meaning: "Min of distancenumber")
Changing the code to:
SELECT cdsDistance AS Distance
, prsFirstName
, prsLastName
, MIN(crtFinalTime) AS MinTime
, MIN(cdsStartDate) AS RaceDate
, MIN(cdsDistanceNumber) AS DistanceNumber
FROM tb.......
GROUP BY cdsDistance, prsFirstName, prsLastName
ORDER BY min(crtFinalTime)
This gives me the wrong outcome because it gives me the "MIN" of every field, and they are not necessarily on the same row.
An option would be to calculate min(crtFinalTime), if for a person there is more than 1 result, calculate min of date, and then (if there is still more than 1 row) min of distancenumber.
Seems complicated, and I have the feeling there must be a better way (apart from: how to get this code)
Stacking subqueries in the FROM statement seems like a option be costly (time wise). There are more than 10 million rows (and growing) to run through.
As an example a few times:
DistanceFirst nameLast name Time Date Distance nr.
500 Yuya Oikawa 34.49 201311155
500 Yuya Oikawa 34.49 201311153
500 Yuya Oikawa 34.49 201311172
Yuya has 3 best times (34.49), 15-11-2013 is the 1st date, then distance nr 3 is the 1st distance raced. Therefore the 2nd row is the only row I would like to get in my endresult.
In MySQL we use "SELECT (....) LIMIT 0, 10" to only return the first 0 to 10 records. Alternatively we could do "LIMIT 10, 20" to return the 10th to 20th records.
What's the equivilent of this in SQL Server?
Thanks
Hi All,
I have two SQL queries that we would like to automate. Ideally we want them to both be scheduled to run and dump their results to a single Excel spreadsheet with two workbooks, one for each query
Is it possible to do this? If not, sending each query to a seperate XLS or CSV file would be OK
Here are the queries:
SELECT p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.unvouched_document_type, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.date_created, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.unvouched_document_no, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.line_number, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.po_no, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.po_line_number, po_line.created_by, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.item_id, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.item_desc, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.qty_received, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.qty_vouched, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.order_date, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.location_id, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.supplier_id, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.supplier_name, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.extended_cost_home
FROM P21.dbo.p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report, P21.dbo.po_line po_line
WHERE po_line.po_no = p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.po_no AND po_line.line_no = p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.po_line_number
and
SELECT p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.unvouched_document_type, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.date_created, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.unvouched_document_no, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.line_number, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.po_no, contacts.last_name, p21_view_inventory_return_hdr.buyer_id, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.po_line_number, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.item_id, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.item_desc, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.qty_received, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.qty_vouched, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.order_date, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.location_id, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.supplier_id, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.supplier_name, p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.extended_cost_home
FROM P21.dbo.contacts contacts, P21.dbo.p21_view_inventory_return_hdr p21_view_inventory_return_hdr, P21.dbo.p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report
WHERE p21_view_inventory_return_hdr.return_number = p21_view_unvouched_po_currency_report.unvouched_document_no AND contacts.id = p21_view_inventory_return_hdr.buyer_id
I'm trying to write a query where if the value of one of the paramters is equal to "-1" it will not include one of the search criteria. For example I have a param called "Gender". 0 = Male and 1 = Female. If the value of the "Gender" param is "-1" I'd like it to find either Males or Females.
Code (please not this doesn't compile):
SELECT
[UserID],[Gender]
FROM
[table_user]
WHERE
Country = @Country
AND IsOnline = @IsOnline
IF (@Gender != -1)
AND Gender = @Gender
Obviously this doesn't work, but I think it conveys the gist of what I'm trying to do. Does the secret lie in default parameters? Or is my IF syntax just flat out wrong?
Thanks!
Hi,
I'm currently trying to retrieve results from a large dataset, there are over 45000 records and I need to use them all to peform counts etc. I have set up views, but my page is still being returned slowly, is there anything I can do to speed this up?
Thanks
Gemma
I need to copy data from TableA to TableB (>5 millions rows). The two are in the same database.
What is the best way of doing this?
I was thinking about using a simple INSERT INTO ... SELECT statement. Is there a faster way to do it with SSIS?
Thanks
I have an SSIS package (SQL 2005 SP2 and Visual Studio SP1) that does the following:
OLE DB Source --> Conditional Split --> OLE DB Command #1 --> OLE DB Command #2
The source reads from database A. Each row is variable-width and up to several KB wide, including two ntext columns.
Command #1 executes a stored proc in db A, using a bunch of inputs and two output parameters.
Cmd #2 executes an update in db B, using the two output params from cmd #1 as inputs.
When the rowset size is small, around 500, everything works fine.
However, when the rowset size is larger, around 5000, SSIS hangs when trying to execute cmd #2. The profiler shows that none of the cmd #2 updates are ever executed. No error messages are produced, and the connection never times out -- it just hangs forever.
If I replace the cmd #2 updates with a simple select, everything works fine. If I replace it with a stored proc that does an update, it hangs.
The work-around I came up with was to create a new table in db B, and do inserts into the table, but unless I'm missing something, this still seems like a bug...
Hi all,
I am using SSAS 2005. The mining model works fine. But it crashes when I run the 'Mining Model Predictions' against large data sets.
I ran it against 5,000,000 records and it went fine.
But exactly same model failed for 5,100,000 records and beyound.
The message is 'Query Execution Failed' and then Visual Studio crashes.
Pl. let me know if anybody has the same experience or knows the solution.
Thanks,
Vikas
I have been tasked with creating a report that shows sales of our products grouped into buckets of 5 each, DESC. I have a table that has the itemNo and revenue. The final report would be something like:
Top 5 Spreads$695,066
Next 5 Spreads$467,845
Next 5 Spreads$416,946
Next 5 Spreads$361,946
Next 5 Spreads$305,607
Next 5 Spreads$270,567
Bottom Spreads$15,954
My initial thinking was to use row_number() and partition to label the rows in groups of 5 like:
item 130,0001
item 229,0001
item 328,0001
item 427,0001
item 526,0001
item 625,0002
item 724,0002
item 823,0002
item 922,0002
item 1021,0002
item 1120,0003
item 1219,0003
item 1318,0003
And then Sum the revenue, grouping by this row_number. But I haven't been able to get it working right.
Dear friend, the following is my query.
1.SELECT a.Avg_Binaryvalue as Avg1,a.Min_Binaryvalue as Min1 from MeasurementData a where Attribute_Flag ='5'
2.SELECT b.Avg_Binaryvalue as Avg2,b.Min_Binaryvalue as Min2 from MeasurementData b where Attribute_Flag ='6'
i need to join this two resultsets. please give me sample query to join this two result sets
i have these 2 queries with the included results sets...What commands could I use to take the TotalBlueCircle Column from the 2nd Results Set and have it included next to the TotalRugby column in the 1st results set??Do i need to do a UNION or use Sub Queries or something else?
View 5 Replies View RelatedCode:
SELECT DISTINCT LEFT([REPORTING_MONTH], 4)+'-'+SUBSTRING([REPORTING_MONTH],5,6) as REPORTING_MONTH, t.EMPLOYEE,
'' as COUNT_FTP,
CASE WHEN [MEDIUM_RCVD] = 'EMAIL' THEN COUNT(MEDIUM_RCVD) ELSE '' END AS COUNT_EMAIL
FROM [GPO].[dbo].[DW_SUBMISSION] as s
JOIN #TEMPActivity as t
[Code] ....
I'm trying to get the set to come out all on one line. REPORTING_MONTH, EMPLOYEE, COUNT_FTP, COUNT_EMAIL
But when I try null or '' it creates a second record and doesn't merge the two results.
I needed to add in the Fiscal Year (FY) to group my results by FY. I changed my code to the following:
/*
EXEC ADAMHsp_BSS_GetNonMedicaidReportTotals
@pstrProviderName = 'FAM SER-WOOD'
*/
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[ADAMHsp_BSS_GetNonMedicaidReportTotals]
@pstrProviderNameVARCHAR(100)
AS
BEGIN
[Code] ....
See my result set in the picture below. The rows with NULL in the 'ProcGrp' column have the totals of the groupings by FY that I am looking for - that's great. What I want to do now is have another row that contains the sums of the values from any row where 'ProcGrp' is null so that I have a totals row.
so async cursor population is supposed to create the cursor and return the cursor id quickly, while the server works on async populating the results. For a keyset-driven cursor, SQL Server stores the key sets in tempdb, which it then uses to fetch data for cursor results. Anyway, this works fine for smaller tables, but I'm finding for large result sets, the async cursor population is very slow and indeed seems to approximate synchronous time. The wait stat I get while it is running (supposedly asynchronously) is TRANSACTION_MUTEX.
Example:
--enable async cursor
exec dbo.sp_configure 'cursor threshold', 0; reconfigure;
declare @cursor int, @stmt nvarchar(max), @scrollopt int, @ccopt int, @rowcount int;
--example of giant result set
set @stmt = 'select * from sys.all_objects o1, sys.all_objects o1';
[code]...
Note that using the SQL "select * from sys.all_objects o1" is much faster than "select * from sys.all_objects o1, sys.all_objects o2". However, if cursor population is async, I'd expect the time to return a cursor id to be similar between the two.
Hi, all experts here,
I am wondering if tempdb stores all results tempararily whenever I query a large fact table with over 4 million records which joins another dimension table? Since each time when I run the query, the tempdb grows to nearly 1GB which nearly runs out all the space on my local system drive, as a result the performance totally down. Is there any way to fix this problem? Thanks a lot in advance and I am looking forward to hearing from you shortly for your kind advices.
With best regards,
Yours sincerely,
Dear All,This is a query surrounding a problem I encounteredyesterday.In SQL Server, it is possible to write a procedure thathas one or more select statements in it.The results from these select statements will all beindividually returned to SQL Query Analyser where theycan be viewed in "grid" views. Also, these individualresults sets can be consumed by eg ADO.NET by steppingthrough each results set in turn and processing therespective results.My question is, can you do the same in a SQL Serverprocedure? ie:Create Procedure Proc1ASbeginselect Col1, COl2from Table1select Col1, Col2, Col3from Table2endCreate Procedure Proc2ASbeginexec Proc1endCan both/either of the results sets from Proc1 beconsumed by the calling procedure Proc2?I can see that you could design the procedures up-front to do almost anything without consuming theresult sets in this way, but if the proceduresreturning the results sets are already built andin use in other places (for instance in client code),can they be re-used on server-side SQL procedures?Thanks in anticipation!Paul.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a report based on our product names that consists of two parts.Both insert data into a temporary table.1. A single grouped set of results based on all products2. Multiple tables based on individual product names.I am getting data by calling the same stored procedure multipletimes... for the single set of data I use "product like '%'"To get the data for individual products, I am using a cursor to parsethe product list.It's working great except that I have no idea how to identify theresults short of including a column with the product name. While thatis fine, I'm wondering if there is something that is like a header ortitle that I could insert prior to generating the data that would looka little tighter.Thanks in advance-DanielleJoin Bytes!
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am calling stored procedure called GetCommonItemCount within another stored procedure called CheckBoxAvailability, the first stored procedure should return a count to second stored procedure and based on that some logic will be executed.
I have 2 problems in that
1. The result is not coming from first stored so the variable called @Cnt is always 0 although it should be 18
2. At the end i need to see in the output the result from second stored procedure only while now i am seeing multiple results of record sets coming.
I have attached the scripts also, the line i described in step1 is
Hello everyone.. I'm working here on a little problem which's driving me nuts : I have two tables :EQUIPMENT :
-EQID
-EQName
-EQblabla QUALITYCHECK :
-QCID
-EQID <---- Is connected with EQUIPMENT
-QCDATE
-QCACTION
-QCnextdate They're needed to manage Qualityactions on some machines we own. Every year, we do quality actions on every machine, after then, we Inserta new QUALITYCHECK-entry into our database and automatically theQCnextdate is generated with QCdate+365days. So far, so easy. So now, how will i do a query against the DB with the NEWEST QUALITYCHECK-entrys for every machine ? The result has to besmth. like that : EQID | EQName | QCDATE | QCNextdate
1 | machine 1 | 21.12.2006 | 21.12.2007
2 | machine 2 | 21.06.2006 | 21.06.2007
3 | machine 3 | 21.11.2006 | 21.11.2007
4 | machine 4 | 21.12.2005 | 21.12.2006
5 | machine 5 | 23.10.2006 | 23.10.2007
AND NOT
EQID | EQName | QCDATE | QCNextdate
1 | machine 1 | 21.12.2006 | 21.12.2007
1 | machine 1 | 21.12.2005 | 21.12.2006
1 | machine 1 | 21.12.2004 | 21.12.2005
1 | machine 1 | 21.12.2003 | 21.12.2004
2 | machine 2 | 21.06.2006 | 21.06.2007
2 | machine 2 | 21.06.2005 | 21.06.2006
2 | machine 2 | 21.06.2004 | 21.06.2005
2 | machine 2 | 21.06.2003 | 21.06.2004etc..
I tried several things with top 1, subquerys, distinct etc..But unfortunatly it seems that im not capable to solve the problem..I would be thankful for any suggestions !
I have a table that looks like
CP | P | ST | Date
where each letter represents a column. I need a SELECT statement that results one row if there is an entry with a date within the last 6 mo for each CP,P,ST combination.
example:
cp1, p1, st1, 1/1/6
cp1, p1, st1, 4/1/6
cp1, p2, st1, 3/1/6
would return just the first and third row...
thanks.
any ideas?
Hello,I am running SQL Server 2000. I would like to know whetherMicrosoft Transact-SQL has a method for limiting the resultset from a query in a way analogous to MySQL's LIMIT keyword,so that, for instance, if the result set contains 10,000 rows,then only the first 10 rows from the record set are output.Thank you,Best Regards,Neil
View 2 Replies View Relatedlets say we have more than 100 000 rows in Table1, and we want to view each 10 rows alone.... and by pressing on a NEXT button we will see the other 10 pages....
there is 2 buttons : NEXT and PREVIOUS
so can anyone tell me how to do that in SQL 2005, and what is correctly called.
I have found a code that does use ROW_NUMBER in order to view results between 2 numbers,
example: rows between 10 and 50....
but It is not what I want, so please I need some help, thank you
By Uncle Sam
lets say we have more than 100 000 rows in Table1, and we want to view each 10 rows alone.... and by pressing on a NEXT button we will see the other 10 pages....
there is 2 buttons : NEXT and PREVIOUS
so can anyone tell me how to do that in SQL 2005, and what is correctly called.
I have found a code that does use ROW_NUMBER in order to view results between 2 numbers,
example: rows between 10 and 50....
but It is not what I want, so please I need some help, thank you
By Uncle Sam
Hello everybody,
I've got a little problem wich i'm trying to solve since 1-2 years and i hoped it would go away with SQL 2005 - but that wasn't the case :(.
Situation:
I've just bought a new Server containing:
SQL 2005
64 Bit Enviroment
4 GB RAM
2x AMD Opteron 2 GHz Prozeccors (Dual Core)
2x RAID Controllers (RAID 1) containing
1.1 System
1.2 Data
2.1 Transaction Logs
I've created a full-text table containing all the search terms i need to search.
Table build:
RecID - int - Primary Key
SrcID - varchar(30)
ArticleID - int - referring to an original table
SearchField - varchar(150) - Containing the search terms
timestamp - timestamp field
Fulltext index:
RecID as Primary Key
SearchField as indexed field - Wordbreaker: Neutral (containing several languages), Accent sensitivity off
Now i've got different tables imported in here resulting in a table size of ~ 13 million rows.
There is no problem with the performance on this catalog if i search a term wich isn't contained in more than 200-300 recordsets - but if i search for a term wich could occur in 200'000 upwards it gets extremely slow.
On the slow query the first records get in after no time, but until the query finished up to 60 seconds pass.
The problem is that i have to sort by a ranking value wich is stored externally - so i need all results to sort them...
current (debugging) query:
SELECT ArticleID FROM fullTextTable AS ft INNER JOIN CONTAINSTABLE(FullTextCatalog,SearchField,'"term*"') AS ftRes ON ftRes.[KEY]=ft.idEntry
Now if i check in the performance monitor:
As soon as i run the query the 'Avg. Disk Read Queue Length' counter on disk D (SQL Data Files) jumps to the top, until the query has finished.
Almost no read/write activity on C: where the Fulltext is stored...
If i rerun the query, after it finished once successfully - it takes place below 1-2 seconds, would be nice to get that result in first place :).
Does anybody know a workaround to this problem?
I have a query that joins two large partitioned tables and depending on the values in the where clause, I can get dramatically different performance results.
The first query completed in around 7s and has 47,000 logical reads.
select mo.monitor_id,
mo.site_id,
mo.testtime,
sum(mo.NumBytes),
sum(mo.DNSTime),
sum(mo.ConnectTime),
sum(mo.FirstByteTime),
sum(mo.ContentTime),
sum(mo.RelocTime)
from monitor_raw mr(nolock), monitor_object mo(nolock)
where mr.monitor_id in (5339, 5341, 5342, 943842, 943866)
and mr.testtime between 'Oct 31 2007 3:00:00:000PM' and 'Nov 30 2007 3:00:00:000PM'
and mo.returncode = 200
and mr.site_id in (101,102,105,109,110,112,115,117,119,122,126,151,132,139,129,135,121,138,143,142,159,148,128,171,176,177,178,111,113,116,118,120,127,133,131,130,174,179,185,205,200,202,203,204,210,211,208,209,212,213,216,199,214,224,225,229,230,232,235,241,245,247,250,254,261,267,264,265,266,268,269)
and mr.escalationlevel = 0
and mr.monitor_id = mo.monitor_id
and mr.testtime = mo.testtime
and mr.site_id = mo.site_id group by mo.monitor_id, mo.site_id, mo.testtime
The second query takes 188s to complete and has 1.8m logical reads. The only difference between the two is the value of the monitor_ids in the where clause.
select mo.monitor_id,
mo.site_id,
mo.testtime,
sum(mo.NumBytes),
sum(mo.DNSTime),
sum(mo.ConnectTime),
sum(mo.FirstByteTime),
sum(mo.ContentTime),
sum(mo.RelocTime)
from monitor_raw mr(nolock), monitor_object mo(nolock)
where mr.monitor_id in (152682, 5339, 5341, 5342, 268080)
and mr.testtime between 'Oct 31 2007 3:00:00:000PM' and 'Nov 30 2007 3:00:00:000PM'
and mo.returncode = 200
and mr.site_id in (101,102,105,109,110,112,115,117,119,122,126,151,132,139,129,135,121,138,143,142,159,148,128,171,176,177,178,111,113,116,118,120,127,133,131,130,174,179,185,205,200,202,203,204,210,211,208,209,212,213,216,199,214,224,225,229,230,232,235,241,245,247,250,254,261,267,264,265,266,268,269)
and mr.escalationlevel = 0
and mr.monitor_id = mo.monitor_id
and mr.testtime = mo.testtime
and mr.site_id = mo.site_id group by mo.monitor_id, mo.site_id, mo.testtime
The two tables have clustered indexes on monitor_id, testtime and site_id. Comparing the execution plan, I can see why there is such a difference in performance. The second query performs a clustered index seek on the monitor_object table starting at the lowest monitor_id, testtime & site_id through the highest monitor_id, testtime & site_id. The first query performs a clustered index seek where the monitor_id, testtime and site_id equals the same values from the monitor_raw table.
My question is, how can I force the second query to use the same execution plan as the first so that I can get better performance?
One possible workaround that I could use is to execute five individual queries, one for each monitor_id and then union the results together but this would require significant code changes to my stored procs.
Thanks,
Tim
PLEASE SEE my update (post #3) for a better simpler explanation!!!!!
Hi,
I need a query which is basically
(query 1)
Except
(query 2)
SQL server supports
(query 1)Union (query 2)
but I can't get the Except to work.
Alternatively,
I also tried to implement it by using the "NOT IN" but didnt work.
Background: 3 tables, accnts, Opty, Opty_postn
I want
the accounts who have 1 or more opty's at 100% (sold) before 1/1/2002 but zero opty's at 100% after 12/31/2001.
accnts has fields ID & name, ROW_ID
opty has fields acct_id, prob, ROW_ID
opty_postn has fields opty_id, close_dt
My query:
SELECT accnt.name
FROM accnt
WHERE
accnt.ROW_ID IN
(
SELECT acct_id
FROM opty
where prob = 100
AND opty.ROW_ID IN
(SELECT opty_id
FROM opty_postn
WHERE close_dt<1/1/2002)
)
AND accnt.ROW_ID NOT IN
(
SELECT acct_id
FROM opty
where prob = 100
AND opty.ROW_ID IN
(SELECT opty_id
FROM opty_postn
WHERE close_dt >12/31/2001)
)
AND accnt.ROW_ID = opty.accnt_ID
my intent was
select account.names
where id
is in set(prob = 100 & sale before 1/1/02)
but not in ( prob = 100 & sale after 21/31/01)
SO ,the accounts which have sales both before and after get counted. But I want only those accoutns which have sales only before 1/1/02.
I hope i explained this right.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Ash.
I am trying to query one table and get two different timeperiods of data, I am summing monthly totals to provide a running year total, but I also need last month's total in a seperate column. This is what I have so far but the subquery makes me group it which provides duplicate grouping.DECLARE @LASTPD AS INT
SET @LASTPD = (SELECT MAX(LASTPERIOD) FROM TABLE)
SELECT NAME,
POST_PD AS [MONTH],SUM(CHARGE_AMOUNT) AS MONTHLY_$,
LASTMONTH.LAST_MONTH,(SELECT SUM(CHARGE_AMOUNT) AS LAST_MONTH
FROM TABLE INNER JOIN TABLE2
ON TABLE2.NAME = TABLE.NAME
WHERE POST_PD = @LASTPD
AND TABLE2.NUM= 539
GROUP BY NAME) AS LASTMONTH
INTO #TEMP_SAFROM TABLE
INNER JOIN TABLE2
ON TABLE2.NAME = TABLE.NAME,(SELECT SUM(CHARGE_AMOUNT) AS LAST_MONTH
FROM TABLEWHERE TABLE2.NUM = 539
GROUP BY NAME, POST_PDORDER BY NAME, POST_PD
SELECT NAME,
LAST_MONTH,
CAST(SUM(MONTHLY_$)AS DECIMAL(20,2)) AS YEARLY_$
FROM #TEMP_SA
GROUP BY NAME
ORDER BY NAME
I popped into the Transact-SQL forum to get some help and created the dbo.selectaudit1 table, which can be queried succesfully.
Code Blockcreate table dbo.selectaudit1 (startkey varchar(10) not null,
endvalue varchar(10) null,
endkey as coalesce(endvalue, startkey))
insert into dbo.selectaudit1 (startkey)
select '042'
union all select '140'
union all select '2089'
union all select '2031'
union all select '2051'
union all select '2100'
union all select '2299'
union all select '2300'
union all select '2349'
union all select '2350'
union all select '2389'
union all select '2390'
union all select '2399'
union all select '2732'
union all select '2733'
union all select '2849'
union all select '2850'
union all select '2883'
union all select '2898'
union all select 'V073'
union all select 'V078'
union all select 'V100'
union all select 'V109'
union all select 'V580'
union all select 'V581'
union all select 'V661'
union all select 'V662'
union all select 'V671'
union all select 'V672'
union all select 'V711'
union all select 'V760'
union all select 'V769'
insert into dbo.selectaudit1 (startkey, endvalue)
select '1400' ,'2089'
union all
select '2100', '2299'
union all
select '2300' ,'2349'
union all
select '2350' ,'2389'
union all
select '2390' ,'2399'
union all
select 'V100' ,'V109'
union all
select 'V760' ,'V769'
Then in reporting services, I created a report with the following query in my dataset. This query works fine in a BIDS query windows, however, when I refresh my dataset and attempt to execute the query I am getting the following error:
Cannot find the object "selectaudit1" because it does not exist or you do not have permissions.
(Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 1088)
Code Block
Select
p.MRN
, p.PatientName
, CONVERT(CHAR(20),p.AdmitDate,101) AS AdmitDate
, CONVERT(CHAR(20),p.DischDate,101) AS DischDate
, p.VisitTypeCode
, d.VisitTypeName
, p.AnyDx
, p.PrinDxCode
, p.PrinDxDesc
, p.SecDx1Code
, p.SecDx2Code
, p.SecDx3Code
, p.SecDx4Code
, p.SecDx5Code
, p.SecDx6Code
, p.SecDx7Code
, p.SecDx8Code
, p.SecDx9Code
, p.SecDx10Code
, p.SecDx11Code
, p.SecDx12Code
, p.SecDx13Code
, p.SecDx14Code
, p.SecDx15Code
From dbo.PtMstr p inner join
ampfm.dct_VisitType d on d.VisitTypeCode=p.VisitTypeCode
INNER JOIN dbo.selectaudit1 sel
ON (PrinDxCode between sel.startkey and sel.endkey
AND DischDate between '2006-11-01' and '2007-09-30')
OR (SecDx1Code between sel.startkey and sel.endkey
AND DischDate between '2006-11-01' and '2007-09-30')
What am I missing?
hi, like, if i need to do delete some items with the id = 10000 then also need to update on the remaining items on the with the same idthen i will need to go through all the records to fetch the items with the same id right? so, is there something that i can use to hold those records so that i can do the delete and update just on those records and don't need to query twice? or is there a way to do that in one go ?thanks in advance!
View 1 Replies View RelatedHello. I currently have a website that has a table on one webpage. When a record is clicked, the primary key of that record is transfered in the query string to another page and fed into an sql statement. In this case its selecting a project on the first page, and displaying all the scripts for that project on another page. I also have an additional dropdownlist on the second page that i use to filter the scripts by an attribute called 'testdomain'. At present this works to an extent. When i click a project, i am navigated to the scripts page which is empty except for the dropdownlist. i then select a 'testdomain' from the dropdownlist and the page populates with scripts (formview) for the particular test domain. what i would like is for all the scripts to be displayed using the formview in the first instance when the user arrives at the second page. from there, they can then filter the scripts using the dropdownlist.
My current SQL statement is as follows.
SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [TestScript] WHERE (([ProjectID] = @ProjectID) AND ([TestDomain] = @TestDomain))"
So what is happening is when testdomain = a null value, it does not select any scripts. Is there a way i can achieve the behaivour of the page as i outlined above? Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
James.
I need to get 3 rows per set based on a date given (must be this date) but I want the rows to be based on this date as...
1 ( row where the date from the date column is the next date after given date )
0 ( row where the date is the closest date prior to the date given )
-1 ( prior to the date at 0 )
And add a column with the relative number.
** The dates for the same name and item will never repeat.
For example, a set of rows...
Row ID, Name, Item, Number, Date
1 Andy, Item1, 12030, 2014-06-30
2 Andy, Item1, 62030, 2014-03-31
3 Andy, Item1, 30300, 2013-12-31
4 Andy, Item1, 40030, 2013-10-31
5 Andy, Item1, 50030, 2013-08-30
6 John, Item2, 50240, 2014-04-30
7 John, Item2, 41400, 2014-03-31
8 John, Item2, 40509, 2014-01-31
9 Andy, Item2, 24004, 2014-03-31
10 Andy, Item2, 20144, 2013-12-31
11 Andy, Item2, 20450, 2013-09-30
12 Andy, Item2, 25515, 2013-06-30
If I have 2014-03-15 as the date and search for 'Andy', I expect...
Row ID, Item, Date, Relative Date
2, Item1, 2014-03-31, 1
3, Item1, 2013-12-31, 0
4, Item1, 2013-10-31, -1
9, Item2, 2014-03-31, 1
10, Item2, 2013-12-31, 0
11, Item2, 2013-09-30, -1
This is what I'm using which I have no issues switching if necessary...
DATEDIFF( quarter, 2014-03-31, date )
date BETWEEN DATEADD( quarter, -1, '20140315' ) AND
DATEADD( day, 1 ( DATEADD ( quarter, 2, '20140315' ) )
which returns...
Row ID, Item, Date, Relative Date
2, Item1, 2014-06-30, 1
3, Item1, 2014-03-31, 0
4, Item1, 2013-12-31, -1
9, Item2, 2014-03-31, 0
10, Item2, 2013-12-31, -1
Not sure if date math is the best option here. Perhaps using row_number() in some way?
I'm trying to avoid having to process the entire table programmatically given the size of the data set.
I have a general question I need a few pointers or explanations. I have a top level Data Flow query in a SSIS package that has been running for years for which I have made some minor changes to pull additional fields and rectify a filter condition.
I have noticed that when I run this same query, exactly as entered in the Data Flow task, in the SQL Server 2012 Management Studio, the query returns some 105,000+ records but when run in development by executing the package the top level task only indicates some 21,000 records returned. Since there was not other transformations or filtering performed, I had expected the same record count and am not getting it.