I know how to do a select statement using linked servers but I need to update a table in Oracle using SQL Server.
For example:
SELECT * FROM OPENQUERY(Oracle, 'SELECT * FROM TEST')
I now need to update TEST using a table in SQL Server. Can someone help?
What's up with this?
This takes like 0 secs to complete:
update xxx_TableName_xxx
set d_50 = 'DE',modify_timestamp = getdate(),modified_by = 1159
where enc_id in
('C24E6640-D2CC-45C6-8C74-74F6466FA262',
'762E6B26-AE4A-4FDB-A6FB-77B4782566C3',
'D7FBD152-F7AE-449C-A875-C85B5F6BB462')
but From linked server this takes 8 minutes????!!!??!:
update [xxx_servername_xxxx].xxx_DatabaseName_xxx.dbo.xxx_TableName_xxx
set d_50 = 'DE',modify_timestamp = getdate(),modified_by = 1159
where enc_id in
('C24E6640-D2CC-45C6-8C74-74F6466FA262',
'762E6B26-AE4A-4FDB-A6FB-77B4782566C3',
'D7FBD152-F7AE-449C-A875-C85B5F6BB462')
What settings or whatever would cause this to take so much longer from the linked server?
Edit:
Note) Other queries from the linked server do not have this behavior. From the stored procedure where we have examined how long each query/update takes... this particular query is the culprit for the time eating. I thought it was to do specefically with this table. However as stated when a query window is opened directly onto that server the update takes no time at all.
2nd Edit:
Could it be to do with this linked server setting?
Collation Compatible
right now it is set to false? I also asked this question in a message below, but figured I should put it up here.
Updating the sp's fixed the error I was getting but the update takes forever on the linked server. Any way to speed things up?
I just reference the server.db.dbo.table in the update statement.
TIA
Hi!
Please
I got the following Error Message when trying to update a AS400 Database
"(Table Name) on (Data Source) not valid for operation"
My question is? Does Sql Server require journaling the files? How Should I change this option?. Please Help!
I did try to fix the above error, but then I got a new message:
OLE DB provider 'MSDASQL' supplied inconsistent metadata. The object '(user generated expression)' was missing expected column 'Bmk1000'.
Could you help me?
I will appreciate your help.
Thanks in advance
Ivette V
Does Anyone know what this means?
I run the query in the attached file on multiple servers with success but some of them refuse to cooperate. I've tried recreating the linked server on the problem servers but this doesn't help. All I want to do is check db file size and free space and get it to work. Why does it have to be so damn complicated?
Any ideas welcome - including an entirely different way of doing this.
The script and table definitions in question are attached
Could not open table '"Helpdesk_New"."dbo"."LogStats"' from OLE DB provider 'SQLOLEDB'. The provider could not support a row lookup position. The provider indicates that conflicts occurred with other properties or requirements.
[OLE/DB provider returned message: Multiple-step OLE DB operation generated errors. Check each OLE DB status value, if available. No work was done.]
OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'SQLOLEDB' IOpenRowset::OpenRowset returned 0x80040e21: [PROPID=DBPROP_BOOKMARKS VALUE=True STATUS=DBPROPSTATUS_CONFLICTING], [PROPID=DBPROP_COMMANDTIMEOUT VALUE=600 STATUS=DBPROPSTATUS_OK], [PROPID=Unknown PropertyID VALUE=True STATUS=DBPROPSTATUS_OK], [PROPID=DBPROP_IRowsetLocate VALUE=True STATUS=DBPROPSTATUS_CONFLICTING], [PROPID=DBPROP_IRowsetChange VA...
I am getting an error trying to update a table in DB2 via SQL Server using a Linked Server. I can query the table using OPENQUERY but not via four-part name.
I can do this...
SELECT
Select * from OpenQuery(db2link, 'Select frst_nm from yccfssc9.person where id_prsn = 2')
When I try to Query using four-part names I get the following error...
7399 OLE DB Provider 'MSDASQL' reported an error. The provider does not support the necessary method.
UPDATE
When I try to update using this...
Update OpenQuery(db2link, 'Select frst_nm from yccfssc9.person where id_prsn=2') Set frst_nm = 'Fred'
I get the following error...
The OLE DB provider 'MSDASQL' indicates that the object has no columns.
When I try to update using four part names I get the error that says that the provider does not support the necessary method.
OTHER INFO
I was originially using version 6.1 of the db2 client (db2odbc.dll) but tried the 7.1 client and got the same error.
I believe we are using version 6.1 of db2 connect.
The mainframe db2 is version 7.0 release 1.0
Any help would be greatly appreciated. I referenced Microsoft Knowledge Base Article #270119 to get the workarounds that I attempted...
Gary
How to write this query so that I can pass a variable (from a cursor) for the were ORDER_ID =.
UPDATE OPENQUERY ([DISPATCHER_LIVE], 'select * from DCSDBA.ORDER_HEADER where ORDER_ID = ''405119-RM18''')
SET CONSIGNMENT = 'UNROUTED'
Hi,I'm using sql server 2000 sp4.I've 2 databases linked, an instance and my local.I'm getting two different errors when trying to update the remote table(local server) from the instance.There is only one row of data in the table with an identity field.1st sql:-UPDATE [local].[database].dbo.NUMBERS SET [f 1]=3This gives me the error:-Server: Msg 8180, Level 16, State 1, Line 1Statement(s) could not be prepared.Server: Msg 170, Level 15, State 1, Line 1Line 1: Incorrect syntax near '1'.If I was to remove the space from [f 1] and use [f1] it would workfine."select [f 1] from [dev001].[fashion Master].dbo.numbers"will return the correct valueAny Ideas ?2nd sql:-UPDATE [local].[database].dbo.NUMBERS SET [field1]=isnull([field1],0)+1This gives me the error:-Server: Msg 7306, Level 16, State 2, Line 1Could not open table '"fashion Master"."dbo"."NUMBERS"' from OLE DBprovider 'SQLOLEDB'. The provider could not support a row lookupposition. The provider indicates that conflicts occurred with otherproperties or requirements.[OLE/DB provider returned message: Multiple-step OLE DB operationgenerated errors. Check each OLE DB status value, if available. No workwas done.]OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'SQLOLEDB' IOpenRowset::OpenRowsetreturned 0x80040e21: [PROPID=DBPROP_BOOKMARKS VALUE=TrueSTATUS=DBPROPSTATUS_CONFLICTING], [PROPID=DBPROP_COMMANDTIMEOUTVALUE=600 STATUS=DBPROPSTATUS_OK], [PROPID=Unknown PropertyIDVALUE=True STATUS=DBPROPSTATUS_OK], [PROPID=DBPROP_IRowsetLocateVALUE=True STATUS=DBPROPSTATUS_CONFLICTING],[PROPID=DBPROP_IRowsetChange VA...If I was to remove the isnull part, then it will work okAny ideas
View 3 Replies View Related
I have 2 database servers ( 2 hardware-servers : A and B ) and I ve written a trigger for update in server A to execute insert statement in server B through linked servers, is there other way to achieve this without linked servers?? All using T-SQL.
Best Regards
Joseph
I have a linked server set up on my local SQL 2000 instance. I try and run an update against an SQL 2005 database and it take 29 seconds. I checked the execution plan and it says it takes the entire time on the Remote Scan. Is there something I need to do to speed this up? There is an index on the PK that I am searching against.
View 2 Replies View Related
I've got the output from a cursor that generates the following sql statement.
Update SERVERNAME.DATABASENAME.dbo.TABLENAME set [update] = 'Y', status = NULL, completed = NULL where trigger_id = 10255
The statement generates the following error if the statement is run remotely
Msg 8180, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Statement(s) could not be prepared.
Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Line 1
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'update'.
But the statement executes without error as formatted if run directly on the linked server.
Both servers are running 2000 sp 3a. The servers will be converted to 2005/2008 without patching to sp4.
Hi there,I'm pretty new to SQL and am having some porblems with a linked server.I have a table on a SQL server which stores employee information.I also have a view on a linked server which stores the same information.What I would like to happen is, whenever the view changes on the linkedserver I want the information to be changed in the table on my server.I've been trying to write a trigger to do this, but have had noluck so far.Can anyone help me?ThanksSimon--Posted via http://dbforums.com
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhen trying to update records in a Sybase 11 ODBC linked server got this error:
View 5 Replies View RelatedWe have 2 instances. One is sqlgpscluster and another is [sqlcdsclustersqlcds]. We have created linked server between sqlgpscluster and [sqlcdsclustersqlcds]. We run the below query on sqlgpscluster instance
UPDATE [sqlcdsclustersqlcds].CDSBusiness.dbo.tblInsertNowAppMonitoring
SET NoCabsDateTime = GETDATE(),City=@City
,Area = dbo.fn_FindAreaSubAreaBasedOnLatLong(@PickUpLat,@PickUpLng)
WHERE CustomerMobileNo=@CustomerMobileNo
We are seeing the below error:
The OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "sqlcdsclustersqlcds" could not UPDATE table "[sqlcdsclustersqlcds].[CDSBusiness].[dbo][tblInsertNow AppMonitoring]". The rowset was using optimistic concurrency and the value of a column has been changed after the containing row was last fetched or resynchronized.
UPDATE CD SET col1=SR.col1,col2=SR.col2,col3=SR.col3,col4=SR.col4,col5=SR.col5,col6=SR.col6,col7=SR.col7,
col8=SR.col8,col9=SR.col9,col10=SR.col10
FROM LNKSQL1.db1.DBO.Table1 CD
join Table2 USRI on USRI.col00 = CD.col00
join table3 SR on USRI.col00 = SR.col00
Here, I'm trying to tun this from an instance and do a remote update. col00 is a primary key and there is a clustered index that exists on this column. When I run this query, it does a 'select * from tabl1' on the remote server and that table has about 60 million rows. I don't understand why it would do a select *... Also, we migrated to SQL 2005 a week or so back but before that everything was running smooth. I dont have the execution plan from before but this statement was fast. Right now, I can't run this statement at all. It takes about 37 secs to do one update. But if I did the update on a local server doing remote joins here, it would work fine. When I tried to show the execution plan, it took about 10 mins to show up an estimated plan and 99% of the time was spent on Remote scan. Please let me know what I can do to improve my situation. Thank you
In an ASP, I have a dynamically created SQL statement that amounts to "SELECT * FROM Server1.myDB.dbo.myTable WHERE Col1 = 1" (Col1 is the table's primary key). It returns the data immediately when executed.
However, when the same record is updated with "UPDATE Server1.myDB.dbo.myTable SET Comments = 'blah blah blah' WHERE Col1 = 1", the page times out before the query can complete.
I watched the program in Profiler, and I saw on the update that sp_cursorfetch was being executed as an RPC once per each row in the table. In a table of 78000 records, the timeout occurs well before the last record is fetched, and the update bombs.
I can run the same statements in Query Analyzer from a linked server and have the same results. The execution plan shows that a Remote Query is occurring on the select that returns 1 row, and a Remote Scan is taking place on the update scanning 78000 rows (I guess this is where all the sp_cursorfetch calls are happening...?).
How can I prevent the Remote Scan? How can I prevent the execution of the RPC sp_cursorfetch for each row in the remote table?
Thank you!
Hi ,
On my Desktop i registered Production Server in Enterprise Manager
on that Server if i go to SecurityLinked Servers
There is another Server is already mapped, when i am trying to see the Tables under that one of the
Linked Server i am getting the Error message saying that
"Error 17 SQL Server does not exist or access denied"
if i went to Production Server location and if i try to see the tables i am able to see properly, no problems
why i am not able to see from my Desk top
i am using the sa user while mapping the Production Server on my DESKTOP using (ENTERPRISE MANAGER)
And i check the Client Network Utility in the Alias using Named Pipe only, i changed to TCP/IP still same problem
What might the Problem how can i see the Tables in Linked Server from my DESKTOP
Thanks
I am using Linked Server in SQL Server 2008R2 connecting to a couple of Linked Servers.
I was able to connect Linked Servers, but I cannot point to a specific database in a Linked Server, also, I cannot rename Linked Server's name.
How to point the linked server to a specific database? How to rename the Linked Server?
The following is the code that I am using right now:
USE [master]
GO
EXEC master.dbo.sp_addlinkedserver
@server = N'Machine123Instance456',
@srvproduct=N'SQL Server' ;
GO
EXEC sp_addlinkedsrvlogin 'Machine123Instance456', 'false', NULL, 'username', 'password'
Is there a way to bypass the syntax checking when adding a stored procedure via a script?
I have a script that has a LINKed server reference (see below) .
INSERT
INTO ACTDMSLINKED.ACTDMS.DBO.COILS ..etc.
ACTDMSLINKED does not exist at the time I need to add the stored procedure that references it.
PLEASE to not tell me to add the LINK and then run the script. This is not an option in this scenerio.
Thanks,
Terry
I cant seem to reference columns within a linked Excel server
using MS SQL express
Code:
UPDATE dbo.Items
SET CCC=XL_SERVER.CCC
FROM XL_SERVER...sheet1$
WHERE BBB LIKE '7%'
i.e I want to update column CCC in my Items table from an Excel table column CCC where column BBB begins with 7
I have set up XL_SERVER correctly.
Help!
Hi,
I've a bit of a problem that I'm stuck on.
I have a system that has the tables on an SQL Server with the front-end on a Microsoft access database. They are connected via odbc and the tables are linked to the access front-end. The odbc connects to the sql server via a user created for the purpose that only has rights to this database. This user has rights set so that they can access/alter any data in the database.
When my users try to alter data on some of the linked tables they get "The Microsoft Jet database engine stopped the process because you and another user are attempting to change the same data at the same time." This does not happen to every table only on some of them.
This happens even when there is only one user accessing the system. If I log into the enterprise manager I can alter those tables/ records without any problem (as some articles I’ve read say if the problem is connected to a corrupt record its not possible to then alter that record and sql server should give me an error message instead).
I have tired.
- Compact and repairing the access front-end.
- Deleting the links in the access front-end then re-linking them.
- Copying the objects from the access to a new blank access db.
- I have tried altering the account the odbc uses to login to the SA account.
- I have asked the server admin to do the 'compact and repair' on the s.q.l server, shrink I believe it is, as some articles suggest this could solve the problem.
- The admin has also tried this on the transaction files (so he has told me).
None of this has worked.
I'm stuck. I don't have any training on SQL server (nor will I be able to have any as I gather the training budget may be needed to fill some finance holes). If anyone has any idea of the answer to my problem or could point me in a direction that I could try investigating I would be very grateful. I have asked the admin if it’s anything to do with transactions, he has told me he does not know how to see those but he will try to find out if we can. Am I shooting in the dark or does this sound like a transaction/process locking problem? Is there something I should be looking for?
Thanks in advance.
I'm trying to update a field (tmpRequestID) in a SQL Express table (tblTSubRequest) using a value in a SQL 2000 database field (fldtmpRequestID) in the dbo.NewPurchase table.
The procedure I thought would work is:
USE [tempPurchase]
GO
/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[UpdateSubfldRequestID] Script Date: 07/11/2007 15:01:51 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[UpdateSubfldRequestID]
AS
BEGIN
-- Insert statements for procedure here
UPDATE tblTSubRequest
SET tmpRequestID = tblRequest.fldRequestID
FROM tblTSubRequest INNER JOIN
[NGTXA4-RSMSZ-01].NewPurchase.dbo.tblRequest ON tblTSubRequest.fldRequestID = tblRequest.fldRequestID
WHERE (tblRequest.fldUpdateCode = 99)
END
It appears that the procedure cannot read the field value on the 2000 server and the 2000 server is linked to the 2005 express edition.
Hello,
I am trying to update some SQL-linked tables in my Access database by repoiting the existing linked tables to a new datasource. The problem is, when I go to select the machine data source where the table sits, I get an error message saying the MS Jet Database can't find the object. This is because when Access creates the linked table, it replaces the period in the <schema>.<table_name> with an underscore. So when I go to update the links, it is essentially looking for the new table with the wrong file name.
I have about 80 linked tables to update and I haven't been able to figure a work-around. HELP PLEASE!
Cheers,
Josh
Hi all.
I need your help.
I create a linked server on SQL 2005 server using IBMDA400 as provider.
I create a VBscript to update some data on DB2, and issue begin trans and commit trans. Kindly refer to below code.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Set oKCDat = CreateObject("KCDAT.kcdatapi")
Set objConnection = oKCDat.OpenConnection_SQL(strDataSource,strDB, strUserID, strPassword)
Set rs = CreateObject("ADODB.Recordset")
strName = "TEST1"
strTemp1 = "2"
strTemp2 = "3"
intTemp1 = 199
strSQLStatement = "SELECT * FROM QS36F.TEST WHERE PRACNM = ''" & strName & "''"
strUpdSQL = "TEST1 = '" & strTemp1 & "', TEST2 = '" & strTemp2 & "', TEST3 = " & intTemp1
strSQL = "UPDATE OPENQUERY(TESTDB2," & "'" & strSQLStatement & "')" & " SET " & strUpdSQL & ";"
objConnection.BeginTrans
objConnection.Execute(strSQL)
objConnection.CommitTrans
objConnection.Close
Set rs = Nothing
Set oKCDat = Nothing
Set objConnection = Nothing
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
When i run above script, it prompt me an error message;
"Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server
The requested operation could not be performed because OLE DB provider "IBMDA400" for linked server "TESTDB2" does not support the required transaction interface."
If i run it without "begintrans" and "committrans", it update the data successfully.
Does anyone know about it?
Highly appreciated for above matters.
Regards
we are having an existing cube in that we need to update with new measures . The Measure groups are added to the cube as linked object. so when we are updating the measure group it is throwing the exceptions as follows..“Errors in the OLAP storage engine: The metadata for the statically linked measure group, with the name of 'SalesActual', cannot be verified against the source object.”
View 5 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to check/notify if something (record) has changed in the linked table (from linked server) and automatically update table in local one?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am hoping someone can shed light on this odd behavior I am seeing running a simple UPDATE statement on a table in SQL Server 2000. I have 2 tables - call them Table1 and Table2 for now (among many) that need to have certain columns updated as part of a single transaction process. Each of the tables has many columns. I have purposely limited the target column for updating to only ONE of the columns in trying to isolate the issue. In one case the UPDATE runs fine against Table1... at runtime in code and as a manual query when run in QueryAnalyzer or in the Query window of SSManagementStudio - either way it works fine.
However, when I run the UPDATE statement against Table2 - at runtime I get rowsaffected = 0 which of course forces the code to throw an Exception (logically). When I take out the SQL stmt and run it manually in Query Analyzer, it runs BUT this is the output seen in the results pane...
(0 row(s) affected)
(1 row(s) affected)
How does on get 2 answers for one query like this...I have never seen such behavior and it is a real frustration ... makes no sense. There is only ONE row in the table that contains the key field passed in and it is the same key field value on the other table Table1 where the SQL returns only ONE message (the one you expect)
(1 row(s) affected)
If anyone has any ideas where to look next, I'd appreciate it.
Thanks
If I have a table with 1 or more Nullable fields and I want to make sure that when an INSERT or UPDATE occurs and one or more of these fields are left to NULL either explicitly or implicitly is there I can set these to non-null values without interfering with the INSERT or UPDATE in as far as the other fields in the table?
EXAMPLE:
CREATE TABLE dbo.MYTABLE(
ID NUMERIC(18,0) IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
FirstName VARCHAR(50) NULL,
LastName VARCHAR(50) NULL,
[Code] ....
If an INSERT looks like any of the following what can I do to change the NULL being assigned to DateAdded to a real date, preferable the value of GetDate() at the time of the insert? I've heard of INSTEAD of Triggers but I'm not trying tto over rise the entire INSERT or update just the on (maybe 2) fields that are being left as null or explicitly set to null. The same would apply for any UPDATE where DateModified is not specified or explicitly set to NULL. I would want to change it so that DateModified is not null on any UPDATE.
INSERT INTO dbo.MYTABLE( FirstName, LastName, DateAdded)
VALUES('John','Smith',NULL)
INSERT INTO dbo.MYTABLE( FirstName, LastName)
VALUES('John','Smith')
INSERT INTO dbo.MYTABLE( FirstName, LastName, DateAdded)
SELECT FirstName, LastName, NULL
FROM MYOTHERTABLE
I'm new to this forum.
This 'problem' has occured many times, but I've always found a way around it.
I have pages with datagrids, in which a user can edit a certain fields and then update the tables with new data. Lets say when a user edit a Name field and a money field. If he/she left those two fields blank, the table is automatically updated with a <null> (for the name field) and a 0 (for the money field.) Both these columns were set up to allow Null values.
Anyone has an idea why they were updated that way? And is there like a standard on how the data types are updated if a field is left blank?
Thank you very much.
Hi
I have created a linked server from SQL Server 2005 (SP 1) to SQL Service 2000 (SP 4) with a sql server login that is available on both servers but with different passwords and permissions.
I am getting the following error while accessing the linked server in management studio based on the scenario given below ;
------ Error Message Starts
OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "(SQL Server 2000 instance name)" returned message "Communication link failure".
Msg 10054, Level 16, State 1, Line 0
TCP Provider: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host.
Msg 18456, Level 14, State 1, Line 0
Login failed for user 'abc'.
------ Error Message Ends
Consider login name is abc.
Now this login abc has sysadmin rights on sql server 2005.
The same login abc has only db_datareader rights on sql server 2000 on just one database and is not associated with any fixed server role.
I have configured the linked server using the following options;
1. I have tried impersonating login from SQL Server 2005 to SQL Server 2000 .
2. I have also tried specifying remote login / password option.
Anyone having any idea, would be of great help.
Regards,
Salman Shehbaz.
i did "Linked server" between To Servers , and it's Working.
---------------------------
For Example :
Server 1 =S1.
Server = S2.
i create table in S1 : name = TblS1
i create same table in S2 : name TblS2
and i create trigger(name tr_cpD) From S1 in TblS1 For send data To TblS2 in S2
/****************** trigger Code ***************
CREATE TRIGGER dbo.tr_cpD
ON dbo.TblS1
AFTER INSERT
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
insert into [S2].[dbname].[dbo].[TblS2] Select ID,Name from insertedEND
**************************************************
result is :
Msg 7399, Level 16, State 1, Procedure tr_cpD, Line 14
The OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "S2" reported an error. The provider did not give any information about the error.
Msg 7312, Level 16, State 1, Procedure tr_cpD, Line 14
Invalid use of schema or catalog for OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "S2". A four-part name was supplied, but the provider does not expose the necessary interfaces to use a catalog or schema.
how i can execute this trigger
Can I connect from a SQL Server 2005 database to a SQL Server 2000 database, without establishing a linked server connection.
I need to fire a SELECT query on a SQL Server 2000 database, but don't want to add it as a linked server. Is there any way I can do this or its not possible??
I have a Sybase Adaptive Server Enterprise server which I need to set up as a linked server in SQL Server 2005. The Sybase server is version 12.5.2, and the Sybase ODBC driver version is 4.20.00.67. I have already installed the Sybase client software on the server.
I also created a SystemDSN on the SQL Server to connect to the Sybase server. I tested the connection and it was able to connect.
I ran the following code to create the linked server:
<code>
EXEC master.dbo.sp_addlinkedserver @server = N'LinkedServerName', @srvproduct=N'Sybase', @provider=N'MSDASQL', @datasrc=N'Sybase System DSN', @provstr=N'"Provider=Sybase.ASEOLEDBProvider;Server Name=servername,5000;Initial Catalog=databasename;User Id=username;Password=password"'
</code>
I then ran sp_tables_ex to make sure I could view the tables in the Sybase database. Here is the error message I get:
<code>
OLE DB provider "MSDASQL" for linked server "LinkedServerName" returned message "[DataDirect][ODBC Sybase Wire Protocol driver]Error parsing connect string at offset 13. ".
Msg 7303, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_tables_ex, Line 41
Cannot initialize the data source object of OLE DB provider "MSDASQL" for linked server "LinkedServerName".
</code>
Any ideas what is happening here?