Linq-to-SQL And ASP:Repeater

Hi there,

In 2005.NET, if I used an asp:repeater, I would load the data from source and then manipulate it like so://load the data from source using a predefined connection and SQL Statement.private void LoadMyDataFromSource(){        try
        {
            connection.Open();
            OleDbDataReader myReader = comm.ExecuteReader();                        rptrCatList.DataSource = myReader;
            rptrCatList.DataBind();             myReader.Close();   
        }        finally
        {
            connection.Close();
        }} //catch the ItemDataBound event and manipulate the data how I wish before it's loaded into the Repeater.protected void rptrCatList_ItemDataBound(object sender, RepeaterItemEventArgs e)
      {
        if (e.Item.ItemType == ListItemType.Item || e.Item.ItemType == ListItemType.AlternatingItem)
        {
            int title = 4; //this is the index of the column I wish to manipulate((Label)e.Item.FindControl("lblTitle")).Text = ((IDataRecord)e.Item.DataItem).GetString(title) + ":"       }   }This would give me all the flexbility I ever needed. But now I wish to use linq and since the IDataRecord relies on dataReader sources, I cannot obtain the same flexbility. Can anyone point me in the right direction for obtaining the same kind of flexbility but using a linq-to-SQL dataContext? I wish to manipulate mostData that comes through from my source, so: //loadng the data in via my linq-to-sql context.private void LoadProducts()
    {
        MyDataContext db = new MyDataContext ();        var all = from p in db.Products_IncontinenceStandards
                  where p.Product_Cat == "Category1"
                  select p;        rpterCat.DataSource = all;
        rpterCat.DataBind();
    }This is where I get stuck because, even though I can still capture the ItemDataBound event since I have databound the Repeater to the linqSource, I can't access the individual fields (or this is what I think I can't do!), Does anyone know how to relate to this so I can create the same effect? Many Thanks,Nathan Channon