MDX Queries Return Different Results
May 29, 2008
Hi,
I am new to MDX and I have created a query listed below, this returns the correct information from the cube. However when I split the query into a CREATE SET and Query the data returned is wrong. I need to include the set creation in the cube but this returns the wrong information. I thought that information returned by these two queries would be indentical can anyone explain please.
Thanks David
SELECT
({[Time Calculations].&[Current Period],[Time Calculations].[Prior Year]}) on columns,
Filter (([Store].[Store No].[Store No].Members),
([LFL Month Store].[Month Lf L Store].&[Month LfL Store]) <> 0) on rows
from finance
where( [LFL Calendar].[LFL Calendar Hierarchy].[Year].&[2008].&[Qtr 1 2008].&[P3:April 2008] ,
[Measures].[GL Amount])
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
create SET [Finance].[LFL Stores List] AS
Filter (([Store].[Store No].[Store No].Members),
([LFL Month Store].[Month Lf L Store].&[Month LfL Store]) <> 0)
SELECT
({[Time Calculations].&[Current Period],[Time Calculations].[Prior Year]}) on columns,
[LFL Stores List] on rows
from finance
where( [LFL Calendar].[LFL Calendar Hierarchy].[Year].&[2008].&[Qtr 1 2008].&[P3:April 2008] ,
[Measures].[GL Amount])
View 8 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 1, 2004
Hi,
I would like to use the result table of the first query in a number of other queries. How do I do this ?
Thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2005
I have created a search interface for a large table and I allow users to search on keywords. The users can enter multiple keywords and I build a SQL based on their input to search a full-text indexed table. However the users want to be able to search like an old system they had, where they enter single words and then combine their searches to drill-down into the results. What would be the best method to combine searches?At the moment I can create a merged query from 2 queries if they have searched using single words, but I know down the line it will get far more complicated if they keep combining and merging even with multiple word entries. Each time they search I store the 'where' section of each query, then if they choose to combine I have a function to build a new query through arrays (to eliminate duplicates and sort etc)Is there a better way in SQL to combine queries as sometimes the logic of the combined query means no results are returned (because of OR/ AND conditions in the wrong places etc)e.g.1. Select count(ID) as myCount FROM myTable where (CONTAINS(title,'"run"') OR CONTAINS(subject,'"run"'))2. Select count(ID) as myCount FROM myTable where (CONTAINS(title,'"level"') OR CONTAINS(subject,'"level"'))Combined using my function creates:Select count(ID) as myCount FROM myTable where (contains(title,'"level"') AND contains(title,'"run"')) OR (contains(subject,'"level"') AND contains(subject,'"run"'))
When I combine I'm drilling down, so if the first query returns a count of 400 (where the title OR subject contains 'run') and then the second query returns 600 records (where the title OR subject contains 'level') I need to combine so that I'm looking for records where the title contains both keywords 'run' AND 'level' OR else the subject contains both 'run' AND 'level' and I end up with say 50 records where the title has both keywords OR the subject holds both words. I think the main trouble lies if they try combine a previously combines search with a new search. here my logic gets totally thrown and I'm not sure how to handle soemthing like this. Has anyone got any ideas or experience with this kind of functionality? In SQL or even in vb.net is there a method to combine searches easily?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2005
I'm trying to create a list of orders in my db that has been created correctly (some orders are not dealt with correctly...) An order should go from "open -> assigned" to "assigned -> responded" status.
I got the following query:
select org.name, count(order) AS correct, NULL AS Total
from order
left join orderstatus o1 on order.id = o1.order_id
left join orderstatus o2 on order.id = o2.order_id
left join org on order.orgid on user.id
where
o1.status = 'Open -> Assigned'
and o2.status = 'Assigned -> Responded'
and o1.time_stamp < o2.time_stamp
This gives me a list of all organisations with the correct number of orders in the system...
But now I need to add the total number of tickets they got in the system. So I was thinking about a union with a query without the were constraints
UNION 'with the above query
select org.name, NULL AS correct, count(order) AS Total
from order
left join orderstatus o1 on order.id = o1.order_id
left join orderstatus o2 on order.id = o2.order_id
left join org on order.orgid on user.id
..but that gives me a list like this:
name correct total
org1 324 NULL
org1 NULL 423
How can I combine them, or maybe doing it a better way?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 21, 2007
Hi,
I have to queries that return tables with the same names. How do i add these 2 so it returns one table?
Thanks for your help.
Mike
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hi all,Here is my problem, I have 3 tables :People-------------IDPeopleFirstnameLastnameCars------------IDPeopleCarnameBoats------------IDPeopleBoatname1 person can have 0 or n car/boatI want to a result set displaying : Firstname, Lastname, NumberOfCars,NumberOfBoatsI have two queries, but i want to merge the results in one. how can i dothis ?This one gives me FIRSTNAME, LASTNAME and CARCOUNT------------------------------------SELECT dbo.People.IDPeople, dbo.People.FirstName, dbo.People.LastName,COUNT(dbo.Cars.CarName) AS CARCOUNTFROM dbo.People LEFT OUTER JOINdbo.Cars ON dbo.People.IDPeople = dbo.Cars.IDPeopleGROUP BY dbo.People.IDPeople, dbo.People.FirstName, dbo.People.LastNameThis one gives me FIRSTNAME, LASTNAME and BOATCOUNT------------------------------------SELECT dbo.People.IDPeople, dbo.People.FirstName, dbo.People.LastName,COUNT(dbo.Boats.BoatName) AS BOATCOUNTFROM dbo.People LEFT OUTER JOINdbo.Boats ON dbo.People.IDPeople = dbo.Boats.IDPeopleGROUP BY dbo.People.IDPeople, dbo.People.FirstName, dbo.People.LastNameThanks in advancePhil
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Does anyone know how I can 'join' the results ofone SQL query to the bottom of another?Eg. I have two queries:1. SELECT Name, Surname FROM People WHERE Surname = SmithNAME SURNAMEAdam SmithJohn SmithMichael SmithSteve Smith2. SELECT Name, Surname FROM People WHERE Surname = JonesNAME SURNAMEBob JonesLarry JonesTom JonesWhat I want to produce is:NAME SURNAMEAdam SmithJohn SmithMichael SmithSteve SmithBob JonesLarry JonesTom JonesHowever, if I use UNION like this:SELECT Name, Surname FROM People WHERE Surname = SmithUNIONSELECT Name, Surname FROM People WHERE Surname = Jonesit mixes up all the results:NAME SURNAMEAdam SmithBob JonesJohn SmithLarry JonesMichael SmithSteve SmithTom Jones(I guess it's sorting by the first field, NAME).Is there a way to stop it sorting the results, so that itjust tacks the second query results to the bottom of thefirst query results?(I realise I could use "ORDER BY Surname" to get the same resultin this simple example, but for the more complicated queriesI want to use it won't work).Thanks for any help,Matt.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 12, 2007
hi,
my first query is:
"SELECT TBL_STOK.stok_adi, TBL_STOK.fiyat1 FROM TBL_STOK INNER JOIN" _
TBL_BARKOD ON TBL_STOK.stok_id = TBL_BARKOD.stok_id " _
where TBL_BARKOD.barkod=@barkod"
second query :
"SELECT TBL_STOKDEPO.fiyat1 FROM TBL_BARKOD left outer JOIN TBL_STOKDEPO ON TBL_BARKOD.stok_id = TBL_STOKDEPO.stok_id" _
where TBL_BARKOD.barkod=@barkod and TBL_STOKDEPO.depo_kod=@depokod "
i want to merge these queries' results.first query returns 2 columns (TBL_STOK.stok_adi, TBL_STOK.fiyat1)
second query returns 1 column (TBL_STOKDEPO.fiyat1) .but i want a query that returns 3 columns (TBL_STOK.stok_adi, TBL_STOK.fiyat1,TBL_STOKDEPO.fiyat1)
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2008
Hello all,
I have been using T-SQL for a while now although the majority of my work required relativley simple queries.
I just need to know is there a way to JOIN the results of several SELECT queries, maybe through the use of functions??
A reference to any online article would be most helpful.
Cheers,
Sean
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
I'm trying to devise a query for use on SQL Server 2000 that will dowhat was previously done with one query in MS Access. The MS Accessquery was like this:SELECT Count(*) as [Opened],Abs(Sum([Status] Like 'Cancel*')) As [Cancelled]FROM Detail_Dir_LocVWhere (Detail_Dir_LocV.DateOpened > '2004-8-01') andStatus not like 'Deleted'Group By Year(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened)Order By Year(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened)Here were I'm at with SQL Server, TSQLSelect Right(Convert(Char (11), Min(DateOpened), 106), 8) as [MonthOpened],Count(Status) as [Opened]FROM Detail_Dir_LocVWhere (Detail_Dir_LocV.DateOpened > '2004-8-01') andStatus not like 'Deleted'Group By Year(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened) Order ByYear(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened)Which yieldsMonthOpened======================Aug 2004503Sep 2004752Oct 2004828Nov 2004658Dec 2004533Jan 2005736Feb 2005707Mar 2005797Apr 2005412AndSelect Right(Convert(Char (11), Min(DateOpened), 106), 8) as [MonthOpened],Count(Status) as [Cancelled]FROM Detail_Dir_LocVWhere (Detail_Dir_LocV.DateOpened > '2004-8-01') andStatus like 'Cancelled%'Group By Year(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened) Order ByYear(DateOpened), Month(DateOpened)Which yields;MonthCancelled=========================Aug 200478Sep 2004105Oct 2004121Nov 2004106Dec 200475Jan 200582Feb 200571Mar 200594Apr 200533What is desired isMonthOpenedCancelled============================Aug 200450378Sep 2004752105Oct 2004828121Nov 2004658106Dec 200453375Jan 200573682Feb 200570771Mar 200579794Apr 200541233Any assistance would be appreciated.Cheers;Bill
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 22, 2004
Hello guys,
MS SQL server 2000 behavies strange with big queries that involves relatively large number of tables:
If I just enumerate columns I want to receive, the result set is empty. Adding * to the column list without making any change to where clause seems to solve the problem but I guess it's not the best practice.
The most amazing is that this behavior is not stable, so I suppose there's something to deal with server itself, not the application.
Has anybody suffered this problem and what solution was adopted?
Thanks for any information you can provide.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2005
hi all,
can anybody help in combining all the mentioned queries into a single query so as to display all fields in a row.
1.number of imported imported animal type:
select count(*) as import_lic_no from appln_clip ac,consign_animal c,pet p
where ac.ac_id=c.ac_id and p.pet_no=ac.clip_id and ac.appln_id like 'A8%'
2. number of imported animal type that are licensed:
select count(*) as lic_imp_ani_type from pet p,clip c where p.pet_no=c.clip_id
3.percentage: 2/1*100
select percentage=
((select count(*) as lic_imp_ani_type from pet p,clip c where p.pet_no=c.clip_id)
(select count(*) as lic_imp_ani_type from pet p,clip c where p.pet_no=c.clip_id))*100
4.local animal type:total pet records - 1
select number=
(select count(*) from pet p) - (select count(*) from appln_clip ac,consign_animal c where ac.ac_id=c.ac_id)
5.local animal type that are licenced:total pet records-2
select number1=
(select count(*) from pet p) - (select count(*) from pet p,clip c where p.pet_no=c.clip_id)
6.percentage: 5/4*100
select percentage=((select count(*) from pet p) - (select count(*) from pet p,clip c where p.pet_no=c.clip_id)/
(select count(*) from pet p) - (select count(*) from appln_clip ac,consign_animal c where ac.ac_id=c.ac_id))*100
thx,
vani
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 5, 2012
Customers order a product and enter in a source code (sourceCd). This sourceCd is tied to a marketing program. Idea being we can see that 100 customers ordered from this promo, 200 from this catalog, etc etc. The sourceCd that a customer enters is not always accurate so there is a magic process that adjusts this OrigSourceCd into a final SourceCd, that may or may not be the same.
I am trying to generate a result set of customer count by sales program based on both the original and final source code. Problem is, I have to do each query separately because in one, I have to join SourceCdKey to SourceCdKey to get the program associated with that SourceCd and in the other i have to join OrigSourceCdKey to SourceCdKey to get the program associated with the original sourceCd. There are some programs is one results set that are not in the other, and vice versa.
I'm trying to generate a list of that shows customer counts before and after for each program, some which may be null for one, but have counts for the other. I have tries creating 2 separating views and joining them but that doesn't work because it only returns the ones they have in common.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2012
I am running a SQL stored procedure which runs 3 queries on 3 different SQL tables. What is my best option to export the results of these 3 queries to excel?
If it matters they are all SELECT queries, and at most will return < 500 rows.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 19, 2015
I have made a couple of queries I want to use into a Visual studio project, Now is my problem:
All my queries have different statements. I believe the best is to show the results in a Datagridview
How to view them there? I know how to do it... but I have got about 30 queries
Here is my code so far:
Private Sub Form1_Load(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load
ComboBox1.DataSource = MyDB_DevDataSet.DataSetName.
Dim connectionString As String = "Data Source=myDBmySRV;Initial Catalog=Teknotrans_dev;Integrated Security=True"
Dim sql As String = "SELECT * FROM CompanyMain"
[Code] ....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 21, 2005
Hello,I am trying to create a view that shows the followingField1: Sum of Amounts from Table AField2: Count of Amounts from Table AField3: Sum of of Amounts from Table BField4: Count of Amounts from Table B......Field3: Sum of of Amounts from Table HField4: Count of Amounts from Table H......Things are a bit more complex but this is the gist.I am using SQL 2000.I know how to do this pretty easily using a stored procedure. But howcan I do it in a view? A SQL server won't meet my needs in thissituation.I tried OpenQuery ('myserver', 'exec myprocedure') but get the messagethat my server is not configured for data access. I tried the systemstored procedure to set data access to true but nothing seemed tohappen.I also tried Select * from (Select Statement1, select statement2)but got syntax error at the comma between statement1 and statement2.Trying to use select Statement1 as ABC to does not seem to work either.Is there a way to do what I want without making 15 views and then afinal view that shows them all together? I know I could probably dosomething by creating a ton of functions, but it really seems thisshould not be that hard...I am definitely open to any easy suggestions!Thanks,Ryan
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2007
Hi,
We have a client who runs SQL Server 2000 queries on one database server and performance is approx. 4 seconds. If the database is backed up, no tables in the query or indexes on these tables are modified (we may run a small script that affects stored procedures, views, etc.) the query can run virtually forever.
The customer is runing a cluster and we are running a stand-alone. Although, the two environments that they run in and have these wildly different results in are the same.
The queries are not worth listing (join a couple of tables and views, select a few columns, put on a few conditions--nothing crazy).
Is this normal behavior for MS SQL Server?
I've personally seen where a database is backed up and query plans and performance are different from one server to another, but we are looking at extreme cases here. In fact, on the second server, the majority of the queries are faster and only a couple run very slowly.
Also, the query optimizer seems to be making poor decisions at this custoemer. For example, two tables will be cross joined (forming over 200 million records) and then table scans ensue. The process in some cases will take a 4 second query to 45 minutes.
To me none of this makes any sense. I've been working with SQL Server since 1997 and have not experienced any type of performance problems or variances of this magnitude. Although this is a 6GB database, SQL Server 7 ran on a terabyte without even blinking, so I wouldn't understand why this would have anything to do with it.
Also hampering our efforts is that we do not have easy access to this SQL Server database to get our hands on it and debug these issues.
Does anyone know of a way to examine these issues in a "system wide" manner to determine what the problems could be since the problems are not specific to the database (i.e. .bak file) but seem to be specific to the server?
They have also had database corruption (an index that wouldn't update) and had to roll back the database. Would that indicate that the MDF/LDF's are unstable? Is there a way to figure out if there is some type of MDF/LDF file structure corruption?
Thanks,
Henry.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 5, 2008
I'm having difficulty coming up with the right syntax for a query. Suppose I have a database containing a Stores table, an ProductInventory table, and a Customers table. The Stores table has an ID field that serves as a foreign key in both the ProductInventory table and in the Customers table. I'm trying to write a query that, for each Store record, will return the total number of records in the ProductInventory table and the total number of records in the Customers table.
The following query returns, for each store, the total number of records in the ProductInventory table:
SELECT Stores.Name,
COUNT(ProductInventory.ID) AS ProductInventoryItemCount
FROM Stores
LEFT JOIN ProductInventory ON Stores.ID = ProductInventory.StoreID
GROUP BY Stores.Name
The following query returns, for each store, the total number of records in the Customers table:
SELECT Stores.Name,
COUNT(Customers.ID) AS CustomerCount
FROM Stores
LEFT JOIN ProductInventory ON Stores.ID = Customers.StoreID
GROUP BY Stores.Name
I combined the two queries:
SELECT Stores.Name,
COUNT(ProductInventory.ID) AS ProductInventoryItemCount,
COUNT(Customers.ID) AS CustomerCount
FROM Stores
LEFT JOIN ProductInventory ON Stores.ID = ProductInventory.StoreID
LEFT JOIN Customers ON Stores.ID = Customers.StoreID
GROUP BY Stores.Name
When I run this last query, however, I get an "Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type int" error. Using COUNT_BIG instead of COUNT eliminates the error, but the numbers that are generated are astronomical in size. This indicates to me that there is a *lot* more table joining going on than I expected
What is the correct syntax to produce the desired results? I have a few other tables similar to ProductInventory and Customers; I'm hoping to extend the correct syntax so as to be able to get a comprehensive record count list for each store. Thanks for your help!
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2015
I am trying to get this query to the point where it will return only results that meet specific conditions. Here is the current query I have:
use mdb
SELECT call_req.ref_num, prob_ctg.sym, act_type.sym, act_log.description
FROM call_req
INNER JOIN prob_ctg
ON call_req.category = prob_ctg.persid
INNER join act_log
ON call_req.persid = act_log.call_req_id
INNER JOIN act_type
ON act_log.type = act_type.code
where prob_ctg.sym like 'rd1.%' and prob_ctg.auto_assign=1 and call_req.active_flag=0 ORDER BY call_req.ref_num, act_log.time_stamp DESC
This produces results as follows:
I3835493FY15 RD1.Desktop Transfer Transfer Asignee from " to Jordana, Jose"
I3835493FY15 RD1.Desktop Close Status changed from 'Resolved' to 'Closed'
I3835493FY15 RD1.Desktop Close Status changed from 'Open' to 'Resolved'
I3835493FY15 RD1.Desktop Event Occurred AHD05447 No eligible Request Locations
I3835493FY15 RD1.Desktop Initial Create new request/incident/problem
[Code] .....
This query gives me the total number of records that meet my overall criteria, but what I need to have is a count of the total distinct number of call_req.ref_num and then I need a count of the number of records where act_type.code = TR and the text of act_log.description contains text including "Transfer Group From" and then I need a count of the records where act_type.code = EVT and the text of act_log.description contains text including "AHD054".
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2006
USE AdventureWorksGO-- Retrieve order manifestSELECT SalesOrder.SalesOrderID,SalesOrder.OrderDate,SalesOrder.AccountNumber,SalesOrder.Comment,Item.ProductID,Item.OrderQtyFROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader SalesOrderJOIN Sales.SalesOrderDetail ItemON SalesOrder.SalesOrderID = Item.SalesOrderIDWHERE SalesOrder.SalesOrderID = 436591. Examine the query in the file, noting that it retrieves data from theSales.SalesOrderHeader and Sales.SalesOrderDetail tables in theAdventureWorks database.2. ON the toolbar, click Execute.3. Review the query results.?Modify the query to retrieve <rowelements1. Make the necessary changes to the query to return the data in thefollowing XML format (hint: use FOR XML).Thanks In Advance,~CK
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 9, 2014
So I'm trying out full-text indexing for the first time and, in particular, FileTables in SQL Server 2012. I've followed a Microsoft walkthrough and everything seems to be ok. However, when I query the table using the CONTAINS keyword, I get no results (a regular query to make sure there are records in the table returns the expected number of results).
I'm now trying to troubleshoot, and have been using the FULLTEXTCATALOGPROPERTY function, but I don't understand the results.
If I run SELECT FULLTEXTCATALOGPROPERTY(N'CatlogName',N'ItemCount'), I get a result of 51. There are 96 documents in the NTFS folder where the documents are stored, and the table has 96 records, so I don't know where 51 is coming from. 55 of the documents are .DOC files, the rest are .PDF, and some (or maybe all) of the PDFs are scanned images of documents, which I don't expect to be indexed, so maybe that explains it. And in another thread in these forums, a poster suggests that the result for this function should be either 0 or 1, with 0 meaning that no documents are pending indexing, but maybe I've misunderstood that.
If I run SELECT FULLTEXTCATALOGPROPERTY(N'CatalogName',N'UniqueKeyCount'), I get a result of 2. I have got two full-text indexes in this catalog (one on the FileTable, one on a regular table with FT enabled). Is this result therefore expected? Again, reading online seems to suggest that a result of 0 is desirable, but I don't understand why, and if it is I don't understand why my result is 2!
I've now also run SELECT* FROM sys.dm_fts_index_keywords(DB_ID('DatabaseName'), Object_ID('dbo.FileTableName)), which I believe is supposed to list all of the indexed words from the table specified. I get one row returned, as follows:
keyword: 0xFF
display_term: END OF FILE
column_id: 2
document_count: 40
So basically, it's not indexed any words at all. And why is the document count only 40 when there are 96 documents in the folder and table?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2015
I have two queries as below;
SELECT EventID, Role, EventDuty, Qty, StartTime, EndTime, Hours
FROM dbo.tblEventStaffRequired;
and
SELECT EventID, Role, StartTime, EndTime, Hours, COUNT(ID) AS Booked
FROM tblStaffBookings
GROUP BY EventID, Role, StartTime, EndTime, Hours;
How can I join the results of the two by matching the columns EventID, Role, StartTime and EndTime in the two and have the following columns in output EventID, Role, EventDuty, Qty, StartTime, EndTime, Hours and Booked?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2015
I want to get output of below query in single row.
Select 'Name'
Select 'Surname'
Expected output is Name,Surname
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2013
Recently I had an application developer approach me and asked if I could provided him with a list of sprocs by returned row count. We had an issue where the application passed in a number of parameters which attempted to return 200k plus rows of data and the application was timing out. He changed the required parameters in the application and a reasonable number of rows were returned as expected. Short term solution to this one problem.
However there are always timeout issues with this particular application and we got to thinking that maybe other sprocs that were called using parameters would also fail at some point in time because too much data was being returned.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2003
I'm executing this dynamic query in the middle of stored proc to get the @hrs2 value:
select @sql=('select @hrs2 = sum('+quotename(@day2)+') from #pso_view where id = ')
select @sql= @sql+cast(@num as varchar(5))
EXEC sp_executesql @sql,N'@hrs2 int OUTPUT',@hrs2 OutPut
SELECT @hrs2
That works, but then it returns a row result with every exec and that messes up my desired row return from the contaner sp for my web control databind
Any tips on how to get the varible populated via the dynamic sql w/o rows return?
THANKS!!!!!!!!
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 24, 2004
Hi,
I have this problem with MS SQL Server.
I have this table 'Request' in which there's 2 fields 'RequestName' and 'DateSubmitted'.
The datatype for 'DateSubmitted' is datetimn.
I have to write a query to extract all the 'RequestName' that falls under each month based on the 'DateSubmitted'.
For example, the table 'Request' has 12 rows, each row ('DateSubmitted') with the month of the year. Like row1 = January, row2 = February etc.
For each month, I have to extract all the 'RequestName' for that month based on 'DateSubmitted' field.
My query is like this:
select RequestName, datename(month, DateSubmitted)as month
from Request where datename(month, DateSubmitted) = 'March'.
By right it should return just one row right?
Instead, it returned me all 12 rows, only one row with value 'March' and the other 11 rows with value 'NULL'. Even if the other 11 rows have value of other months, when i run the above query, it will return me null.
Any help is appreciated.
thanks a million.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Nov 16, 2014
In the T-SQL below, I retrieved data from two queries and I've tried to join them to create a report in SSRS 2008 R2. The SQL runs, but I can't create a report from it. (I also couldn't get this query to run in an Excel file that connects to my SQL Server data base. I've used other T-SQL queries in this Excel file and they run fine.) I think that's because I am creating temporary tables. How do I modify my SQL so that I can get the same result without creating temporary tables?
/*This T-SQL gets the services for the EPN download from WITS*/
-- Select services entered in the last 20 days along with the MPI number and program code.
SELECT DISTINCT dbo.group_session_client.note, dbo.group_session_client.error_note, dbo.group_session_client.group_session_id,
dbo.group_session_client.group_session_client_id, dbo.group_session.signed_note, dbo.group_session.unsigned_note
into #temp_group_sessions
FROM dbo.group_session_client, dbo.group_session
WHERE dbo.group_session_client.group_session_id = dbo.group_session.group_session_id
-- Select group notes
SELECT DISTINCT
dbo.client_ssrs.state_client_number, dbo.delivered_service_detail.program_name, dbo.delivered_service_detail.start_date,
dbo.delivered_service_detail.start_time,
dbo.delivered_service_detail.service_name, dbo.delivered_service_detail.cpt_code, dbo.delivered_service_detail.icd9_code_primary,
[code]....
-- Form an outer join selecting all services with any group notes attached to them.
select * from #temp_services
LEFT OUTER JOIN #temp_group_sessions
on #temp_services.group_session_client_id = #temp_group_sessions.group_session_client_id
;
-- Drop temporary tables
DROP TABLE #temp_group_sessions;
DROP TABLE #temp_services;
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2004
Two questions - one slightly off topic:
1) How do I write a stored procedure in MS SQL so that it returns a results set?
2) How do I get this into ASP.NET so that I can put the values into controls?
Jags
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 16, 2013
I have a table that lists states that I need to see order info from. I am attempting to create a SQL query that displays the production data for those states. So if the state is in my saleState table I want it to show in my query result even if there were 0 sales to that state. Below is the syntax I am trying, but if the count is 0, it is not returning the sales state it is omitting it.
Code:
Select a.state, COUNT(b.recordID)
From saleState a left outer join tblSales b
On a.state = b.state
And b.orderDate between '01/01/2012' AND '12/31/2012'
Need to point out the error in my query syntax?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Sep 30, 2006
I need to return the results of a stored procedure into a temporary table. Something like this:
Select * into #temp from exec (the stored procedure). It appears that I can not do this.
The following will not work for me cause I am not sure how many columns will be returned. I want this to work even if the calling stored procedure is changed (i.e add or take away columns)
insert into (...) exec (the stored procedure.
Does anyone have any ideas how I could do this.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 1, 2006
I thought I would impliment a new feature of my web page using stored procedures and the SqlDataSource object, for practice or whatever, since I don't normally use that stuff.
This is the stored procedure:set ANSI_NULLS ON
set QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
go
-- =============================================
-- Author:Lance Colton
-- Create date: 7/31/06
-- Description:Find the contest winner
-- =============================================
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[AppcheckContest]
-- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here
@BeginDate datetime = '1/1/2006',
@EndDate datetime = '12/31/2006',
@SectionID int = 10,
@WinnerID int = 0 OUTPUT
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
-- Insert statements for procedure here
SELECT top 1 @WinnerID = P.UserID
FROM cs_Posts P
WHERE P.PostDate BETWEEN @BeginDate AND @EndDate
AND P.SectionID = @SectionID
AND P.UserID <> 2100 -- I don't want to win my own contest...
AND SettingsID = 1000 -- This number could be different if i had more than one CS installed?
AND IsApproved = 1
ORDER BY NEWID() -- yes this is slow, but it works...
RETURN @WinnerID
END
It's really simple - just needs to return the one randomly chosen integer userID. I've tested it in query designer or whatever it's called in Management Studio and it works fine there at least.
Thinking I was done the hard part, I created a new web form in visual studio, dropped a SqlDataSource on it, and used the 'configure data source' wizard from the smart tag to do all the work for me. I didn't have any trouble using the wizard to select my stored procedure, and i'm using the sa connection string to simplify my debugging. I tried using the FormParameter / FormField way of getting the output and setting the input parameters. I can't seem to get it working though. There's no errors or anything, just the output isn't coming through.
Here's the code from the aspx codebehind file:Partial Class Contest
Inherits System.Web.UI.Page
Protected Sub btnSelectWinner_Click(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles btnSelectWinner.Click
Dim stuff As New System.Web.UI.DataSourceSelectArguments
SqlDataSource1.Select(stuff)
SqlDataSource1.DataBind()
lblWinnerID.Text = SqlDataSource1.SelectParameters("WinnerID").ToString
End Sub
End Class
As you can see, I wasn't sure if you're supposed to call databind() or select() to actually get the stored procedure to execute, so I tried both. I was hoping the last line of code there would set the label to the value contained in the @WinnerID parameter, but instead it sets it to "WinnerID".
Here's the code from the .aspx file. Most of this was generated by the Wizard, but I messed around with it a bit. <%@ Page Language="VB" MasterPageFile="~/MasterPage.master" AutoEventWireup="false" CodeFile="Contest.aspx.vb" Inherits="Contest" title="Untitled Page" %>
<asp:Content ID="Content1" ContentPlaceHolderID="CPHMain" Runat="Server">
<asp:Button ID="btnSelectWinner" runat="server" Text="Find Winner" />
<asp:Calendar ID="Calendar_From" runat="server"></asp:Calendar>
<asp:Calendar ID="Calendar_To" runat="server"></asp:Calendar>
<asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource1" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:appcheck-csConnectionString-sa %>"
SelectCommand="AppcheckContest" SelectCommandType="StoredProcedure" CancelSelectOnNullParameter="False">
<SelectParameters>
<asp:FormParameter FormField="Calendar_From" Name="BeginDate" Type="DateTime" />
<asp:FormParameter FormField="Calendar_To" Name="EndDate" Type="DateTime" />
<asp:Parameter DefaultValue="10" Name="SectionID" Type="Int32" />
<asp:formParameter FormField="lblWinnerID" defaultvalue="666" Direction="InputOutput" Name="WinnerID" Type="Int32" />
</SelectParameters>
</asp:SqlDataSource>
<asp:Label ID="lblWinnerID" runat="server" Text="???"></asp:Label>
</asp:Content>
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2000
I have a search stored proc which fails to return results when called by more than one user.
I have put selects in the various SPs to trace results and if I call from 3 query windows (executnig each as quickly as I can work the mouse) I get the following:
1st query returns the trace values (including correct count of temp table recs) but no result set
2nd query erturns nothing just "The command(s) completed successfully."
3rd query returns full results.
This seems to be consistent.
We are running SQL Server 7 SP1.
Just upgrading to SP2 to see if that helps.
The main SP calls other SPs to build result sets.
These use quite a few temp tables passed between SPs, parse CSV lists, join different other tables, create a SQL string to exec to do the search and get record IDs to return (no cursors).
The result set is built by a called SP using the temp table with IDs to return.
Anyone know of any problems or can suggest anything to try?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 27, 2015
How can I return results from this SP?
Alter
Procedure sp_Blocking
as
SET NOCOUNT
ON
truncate
table blocked
[Code] ....
View 4 Replies
View Related