MS SQL Server 2000: Rows Get Sorted Automatically
Feb 6, 2008
Hi all,
I import MS Excel 2003 spread sheet in MS SQL Server 2000 through MS SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Manager (rightclick on the table to be filled with dataall taskimport data). My excel file have 2000 rows and 100 columns of data. All the data are imported in relevant attributes cells in good manner. But the rows are sorted automatically. I am trying to say that first row data is match with my excel file. But second row data have gone to 7th row and 7th row have gone to 5th row like that. I need the data sequence what I have in my excel file. What is the problem occurred? How can I solve this?
Can I export my MS Excel 2003 file to MS SQL Server database?
Please help me. I don't have more knowledge in MS SQL Server 2000.
If your answer has any query to run then please mention where should I run that query.
Thanks,
With Regards,
bala.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jan 12, 2005
i have a table and a column called req_id, i have it set as the primary key.. so if i just do SELECT * FROM table, shouldnt the rows returned be sorted by the order that the rows were inserted?
this database was improted from an access database.. when i did that in access it would return the rows in sorted order by the order the row was inserted.. but now in MS SQL, its not sorted in that order.. i can't really tell what type of order it's in
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2007
Hi,
How can I generate rows automatically?
The number of rows is generated according to an input from the user!
Thanks,
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2006
When creating a new row or record in the Master table (by an Adapter update), how do I then populate new records in 15 different Child tables?
These Child tables are attributes of the Master table. I am sure there is more than one way to do this...
Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2014
I know 2008 MS SQL Server has a timestamp data type that adds date and time when the rows are inserted. Is there a way to automatically update the date and time when the rows are updated?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 29, 2015
I would like to perform autodeletion operation from my table using stored procedure....
Here is my table structure:
Emp.id | emp_name | dept | desig | time_out | date | emp_sign |
if the user inserts new employee record that record should delete automatically from original after
30 minutes..I don't want to keep that newly inserted record after
30 minutes...I don't know how to achieve this...
View 12 Replies
View Related
Jun 14, 2007
I have some relatively simple SQL that acts differently between SQL Server 2000 and 2005. Although it is easy to fix I'd like to know if this difference is expected (documented) or a bug, and if there is perhaps a setting/switch I can use to avoid a code review of hundreds of stored procs to look for similar scenarios. Executed the following script in SQL Server 2005 –CREATE TABLE #Floats(FloatID INT IDENTITY,FloatNumber FLOAT NOT NULL)DECLARE @sngCounter floatSET @sngCounter = 20WHILE @sngCounter >= 0BEGININSERT INTO #Floats ( FloatNumber ) VALUES( @sngCounter )SET @sngCounter = @sngCounter - 1ENDSELECT * FROM (SELECT TOP 100 PERCENT * FROM #Floats ORDER BY FloatNumber) AS FloatNumbersDROP TABLE #FloatsGOProduces the following resultset –FloatID FloatNumber----------- -----------1 202 193 184 175 166 157 148 139 1210 1111 1012 913 814 715 616 517 418 319 220 121 0In SQL Server 2000 resultset is this –FloatID FloatNumber----------- --------21 0.020 1.019 2.018 3.017 4.016 5.015 6.014 7.013 8.012 9.011 10.010 11.09 12.08 13.07 14.06 15.05 16.04 17.03 18.02 19.01 20.0
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 14, 2006
Is it possible to have a report automatically export the results to Excel, when the report is generated? ...rather than having to select the format and click Export? .Pl let me know-Thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hallo!I have small or big problem.I want creat Store Procedurs whit limit rows.For example I need rows from 100 to 200.--Select * from tableHow I doing best way.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2007
Hi,
I have the following data in a table called "Products" :
Product Qty LHinging RHinging
-------- ----- -------- --------
Panel_1 1 R
Panel_1 1 L
Panel_1 1 R
Panel_1 1 R
Panel_2 1
Panel_2 1 L
I need to group this data like this :
Product Qty LHinging RHinging
-------- ----- -------- --------
Panel_1 3 L R
Panel_2 1
Panel_2 1 L
How can I do that ???
Thanks !
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2004
Hi,
I have some problems with our database which is growing too large, and was hoping someone might have some tips on what I can do!
I have about 100 clients, each logging about 10 000 rows of status logs a day. So after just a few days the db is growing very large.
At present it's manageable, since I don't need to "dig" into the logs more than a few times a day. The system it self is not affected by the size of the log or traffic on the server. But it will increase to about 500 clients in 2004, and 1000-1500 in 2005. So I really need a smarter solution than what I have today to be able to use the log efficiently.
98-99% of these rows are status-messages which are more or less garbage during normal operation. But I still need to keep them in case an error occurs, and we need to go back an hour or two (maybe a day) to see what went wrong. After 24-48 hours these 98-99% are of no use. I do however like to keep the remaining 1-2%, they are messages like startup, errors, etc. Ideally they should be logged in two separate tables by the clients, but unfortunatelly I cannot make the clients change their logging.
This presents problems on multiple levels. Mainly in searching, which often times out, but also with backup and storagespace. At the moment I check the system for errors, and every other day I just truncate the log-file. It works, but it's not exacly elegant......
The server is a 1100 MHz P3 / 512MB / Windows 2000 Server /
SQL Server 2000. Faster hardware would help, but the problem is more of a "bad design" than "slow hardware" problem.
My log is pretty simple, as follows:
LogId - int - primary key - clustered index
ClientId - int - index asc
LogTypeId - int - index asc
LogValue - nvarchar[2500], ikke index
LogTimeStamp- datetime - index asc
I have deducted 3 different solutions:
Method 1:
Simply run "Delete from db_log where logtyipeid <> stuff_I_want_to_keep".
This is the simplest and the one i prefer, but it takes too long time to complete. Any tips to speed this process up?
Method 2:
Create a trigger which runs something like "Delete from db_log where logtypeid <> stuff_I_want_to_keep and date < today_minus_two_days" every hour or so. This will ensure that the db doesn't grow to large. But if I'm away from work a few days we might loose data we'd wanted to keep.
Method 3:
Copy what I want to keep into another table, and empty the log. Sort of like "Insert into db_log_keep stuff_to_keep; drop db_log; create table db_log; " (or truncate, but that takes a long time too)
But then I would be stuck with two log tables, "48-hour_db_log" and "db_log_keep". I could use a view to "union" them so they would appear as a single table, but that's not ideal either.
However, it seems as this method is what will work best for my set-up, unless there are other suggestions??
Method 4:
...eagerly awaiting ideas!!! :-)
(Also, whatever tips and/or links to info on maintaing VLDB's are greatly appreciated. )
Thanks in advance for your help! :-)
Nikolai
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 20, 2007
Hi
I want to delete the duplicate rows from two tables and get the resultant non-duplicate rows from both the tables into another table
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 13, 2008
Hi guys,
The result of my query I am not able to get it sorted by months.Here is my query & the output.
declare @tbl as table(date datetime,amt int)
insert into @tbl
select '2-jan-2008',100 union all
select '15-jan -2008',200 union all
select '20-jan -2008',500 union all
select '12-jan-2008',300 union all
select '02-feb-2008',100 union all
select '09-feb-2008',250 union all
select '03-mar-2008',500 union all
select '05-mar-2008',800
select Months,SumAmt,MaxAmt,MinAmt from
(
select datename(mm,date)as Months,sum(amt)as SumAmt,min(amt)as MinAmt,max(amt)as MaxAmt,row_number()
over(partition by datename(mm,date) order by datename(mm,date))as rowid from @tbl
group by datename(mm,date)
)t
The result is
Months SumAmt MaxAmt MinAmt
------------------------------ ----------- ----------- -----------
February 350 250 100
January 1100 500 100
March 1300 800 500
I want to get it sorted month wise i.e Jan,Feb,March.But I cannot find a way
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2007
Hi,
I am a newbie so this might be a very basic question. I have a table that not sorted. So I write a query to sort the table like this
Select * from custInfo where custID <> '0' order by custID Desc
Now obviously I have a selection of the original table in desc order. Now I want to get the first custId from thid Desc selection. How do I do this.
So if the unsorted table looked like this
001 Martha
005 Steve
002 Mike
003 David
and the sorted selection looks like this
005 Steve
003 David
002 Mike
001 Martha
And then I want to select Steve's custID which is 005. how do i do this.
Thanks in advance.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2006
If a component requires a sorted input it would seem reasonable that you can check the IsSorted property of the attached input, but this will always return false. I have tried this when connecting the output of the Sort transform to my component, and then check the IsSorted property for this input. It is always false. How can this be, and also how can I see if the path is indeed sorted?
If using a virtual input column in my UI, I get a SortKeyPosition on the columns, but when overriding SetUSageType in the component class I always get zero for the key. Why is the sort information not quite there for me?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Nov 28, 2003
we have a simple table
Key, Name, Address, City, State, Zip ................ect
I would like to keep this table sorted by Name, theirfore I won't have to sort my results with every querry.
I think I need to add something to my insert to tell my table - "Hay take Jones", open up the prober place and stick him in the proper spot.
Ex: We have Appleby and Robertson in our table now. My insert would tell SQL Server to take Jones, figure our where he belongs (alpha), and stick him in, resulting in.
Appleby
Jones
Robertson
This way I wont have to as the querry to sort stuff every time I reference this table, this will save lots and lots of overhead. and help keep my clients happy with quick(er) response.
thanks in advance -arthur
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 18, 2005
I have four tables that need to be loaded into an ASP.NET application. They need to be loaded together into one result set and sorted. Is it possible to load four tables together and sort them using an SQL statement?
To clarify, say I have the following data:
Table1: Anglesey, Cardiff, Ceredigion
Table2: London, Dorset, Lancashire
Table3: Antrim, Armagh
Table4: Glasgow, Berwick, Edinburgh
I'd want the data retrieved from all four tables and sorted so that the data retrieved would be:
Anglesey, Antrim, Armagh, Berwick, Cardiff, Ceredigion, Dorset, Edinburgh, Glasgow, Lancashire, London
I am aware of and am using the SELECT ... ORDER BY feature of MSSQL in my present ASP.NET application to retrieve from single database tables. I'm using merged datasets and a sort method to solve the above problem at the moment.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2006
Hi All,
I'm new to SQL Server.
I have the following table in a database of SQL Server 2005 Express.
ColA ColB
----- -----
A 12
A 10
B 50
B 13
What I want to achieve is the following result :
Col A Aggr
----- ------
A 2,12
B 13, 50
I tried the following query :
SELECT ColA, dbo.Concatenate(ColB) as Aggr
FROM
(SELECT TOP(100) PERCENT ColA, ColB
FROM TABLE_A
ORDER BY ColB) AS Derived_A
GROUP BY ColA
where Concatenate is the CLR User-defined aggreate function written in C#.
What I want to do is to first sort the rows on ColB and then to execute aggregate function over the sorted rows so as to get the above-mentioned results. However, what I got is the following
Col A Aggr
----- ------
A 2,12
B 50,13 -- not sorted
I learnt from the SQL Server documentation that even though the ORDER BY clause is presented in the subquery, the query result is not guaranteed to be sorted. Only ORDER BY clause used in the outer query should work. So, how should this problem be solved? One way of which I'm thinking is to do the sorting in the aggregate function, but I'm worrying if this is harmful to the performance. Could anyone help me to solve the problem?
Thanks!
Regards,
Nathan
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 29, 2015
In the database I am querying, there is a field called "group". I can find out when "group" changes with a time field that was logged whenever group changes. I am trying to find what the value was changed into.
Code:
SELECT
Assignment_Log.DBID,
Assignment_Log.Assigned_Group,
Assignment_Log.Submit_Date
FROM Assignment_Log
This will tell me:
The unique ID of the database
The group it was assigned FROM
The time the assignment took place
I need to find the assignment TO
so what I need to do for the last column is something along the lines of...
Find the next record after the current record by looking at the next Submit_Date and view the Assigned_Group.
If no "next record" can be found, leave the cell empty.
is this possible?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 19, 2013
Is there a way to join tables that have multiple matches to each other (2 records in one table and 2 in another) so that you get 2 records returned instead of 4 with only 1 JOIN ON qualifier?
In our warehouse DB, there is a master location table, an inventory location table, and physical table for counting all product in the warehouse. The master location table has one record per location, but there could be multiple items in that location so my outer join from the master location to the inventory table returns something like:
select M.MASTER_LOC, C.AS ORIG_ITEM, C.ORIG_LOT, C.ORIG_QTY
from
M_LOC M LEFT OUTER JOIN
C_INVT C ON M.MASTER_LOC = C.INVT_LOC
order by M.LOC_CODE
LOCATION ITEM LOT QTY
01-01-A 100 abc 25
01-02-A NULL NULL NULL
01-03-A 200 def 50
01-03-A 200 ghi 50
My problem is adding the third counted inventory table because it could look like anything depending on what we find in the racks:
LOCATION ITEM LOT QTY
01-01-A 100 abc 25 (exact match)
01-02-A 150 cba 75 (Item found)
01-03-A 200 ghi 50 (LOT swapped)
01-03-A 300 def 50 (Item Changed)
My join is returning 4 rows for location 01-03-A which I understand, but I'm wondering if I can sort within the join or make some temp tables so that instead of:
select M.MASTER_LOC, C.AS ORIG_ITEM, C.ORIG_LOT, C.ORIG_QTY, E.AS CNTD_ITEM, E.CNTD_LOT, E.CNTD_QTY
from
M_LOC M LEFT OUTER JOIN
C_INVT C ON M.MASTER_LOC = C.INVT_LOC LEFT OUTER JOIN
E_PHYS_INVT E ON M.MASTER_LOC = E.LOC_CODE
order by M.LOC_CODE
LOC1 ITEM LOT QTY LOC2 ITEM LOT QTY
01-03-A 200 def 50 01-03-A 200 ghi 50
01-03-A 200 def 5001-03-A 300 def 50
01-03-A 200 ghi 5001-03-A 200 ghi 50
01-03-A 200 ghi 5001-03-A 300 def 50
I'd like to just end up with 2 lines sorted by location, item, lot, qty so I can see that there is a problem with that location.
LOC1 ITEM LOT QTY LOC2 ITEM LOT QTY
01-03-A 200 def 5001-03-A 200 ghi 50
01-03-A 200 ghi 5001-03-A 300 def 50
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
HiBeen at this for 2 days now.Each business has several packages which they can sort usingsort_order.I'm trying to get one package for each business(that I can do), howeverI want it to be the one with the lowest sort_order valueAs you can see below the first record has sort_order=5 when it shouldbe 1.Most of the sort_order columns will be zero by defaultAny help so i can get on with my life!CheersGary------------Current select-------------------SELECT *FROM dbo.testAccommodation_Packages T1WHERE (NOT EXISTS(SELECT *FROM testAccommodation_PackagesWHERE business_id = T1.business_id AND Package_ID < T1.Package_ID))--------------results:-----------------------Package_IDbusiness_iditem_namesort_order123rd Night FREE ...5113Donegal Town ... 0204Executive ...0--------------To recreate----------------------CREATE TABLE [testAccommodation_Packages] ([Package_ID] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,[business_id] [int] NULL ,[Item_Name] [nvarchar] (300) NOT NULL ,[sort_order] [int] NULL CONSTRAINT[DF_Accommodation_Packages_sort_order] DEFAULT (0),)-------------------------------------------------INSERTtestAccommodation_Packages(Package_ID,business_id, Item_Name,sort_order)VALUES('1','2','3rd Night FREE when you stay 2 nights MIDWEEK (129 EuroPPS)','5')INSERTtestAccommodation_Packages(Package_ID,business_id, Item_Name,sort_order)VALUES('2','2','Selected Donegal Town Hotel Weekend Sale - 2 B&B and 1Dinner Only € 129 PPS','4')INSERTtestAccommodation_Packages(Package_ID,business_id, Item_Name,sort_order)VALUES('3','2','2 Night Specials -Jan, Feb & Mar 2 B&B and 1 Dinner 149Euro PPS','3')INSERTtestAccommodation_Packages(Package_ID,business_id, Item_Name,sort_order)VALUES('4','2','Easter Hotel Breaks in Donegal Town - 2 B&B + 1 D€169pps','2')INSERTtestAccommodation_Packages(Package_ID,business_id, Item_Name,sort_order)VALUES('5','2','2005 Bluestack Hillwalking, 2 nights B&B, 1 Dinner, 5course Lunch 159 Euros PPS (~109 Stg)','1')INSERTtestAccommodation_Packages(Package_ID,business_id, Item_Name,sort_order)VALUES('6','2','April Pamper Package - 2 Night Special ONLY€195pps','10')INSERTtestAccommodation_Packages(Package_ID,business_id, Item_Name,sort_order)VALUES('7','2','Discount Hotel Prices for 8th & 9th April Only € 119PPS','7')INSERTtestAccommodation_Packages(Package_ID,business_id, Item_Name,sort_order)VALUES('8','2','Golden Year Breaks in Donegal - 4B&B + 2 Dinner€229pps','8')INSERTtestAccommodation_Packages(Package_ID,business_id, Item_Name,sort_order)VALUES('9','2','Hotel Summer Breaks Sale in Donegal - 2B&B + 1 Dinner€169pps','9')INSERTtestAccommodation_Packages(Package_ID,business_id, Item_Name,sort_order)VALUES('10','2','STAY SUNDAY NIGHTS FOR €25PPS','6')INSERTtestAccommodation_Packages(Package_ID,business_id, Item_Name,sort_order)VALUES('11','3','Donegal Town Midweek Special 99 Euro PPS 3 Nights B&B','0')INSERTtestAccommodation_Packages(Package_ID,business_id, Item_Name,sort_order)VALUES('12','3','Bridge Weekend 2 nights B&B 79 Euro PPS (approx 55Stg) Double Room','0')INSERTtestAccommodation_Packages(Package_ID,business_id, Item_Name,sort_order)VALUES('13','3','Donegal Spring Weekend Specials 2 B&B 1 Dinner109.00euros pps','0')INSERTtestAccommodation_Packages(Package_ID,business_id, Item_Name,sort_order)VALUES('14','3','Valentines Weekend 2 nights B&B and 1 four coursegourmet dinner 99Euro PPS','0')INSERTtestAccommodation_Packages(Package_ID,business_id, Item_Name,sort_order)VALUES('19','3','Golden Years Break.40% OFF 4 nights B&B€129.00p.p.s.','0')INSERTtestAccommodation_Packages(Package_ID,business_id, Item_Name,sort_order)VALUES('20','4','Executive Celebration Offer 1 night B&B + Dinner €139 PPS','0')INSERTtestAccommodation_Packages(Package_ID,business_id, Item_Name,sort_order)VALUES('21','4','Watercolour Painting Break 3 B&B Full Board andTuition € 335 PPS','0')
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2007
Hi there,
I have a matrix report that shows a certain columns and rows. I need a row counter to show me the amount of rows in that matrix but it doesn't count properly by using the expression: =Int(RowNumber("matrix1") -1)
I actually don't have any idea on what this expression should be to fix the row count...to illustrate what I get in the report:
______________________________________________________________________________
Chkp | Row | Serial No | Call of Date |Colour| Pillar | AV | Sport | USA | SRA | TAPE |
2019 | 1 | 7006892 | 2003/02/11 | 3644 | 78222 | 3902 | 9182 | | | |
| 3 | 7000123 | 2003/02/11 | 3299 | 17283 | | 9238 | 2793 | | |
| 5 | 7302031 | 2004/01/11 | 3902 | 28932 | | 3233 | 2332 | | |
| 7 | 7273211 | 2004/02/08 | 6727 | 39232 | 8228 | 3293 | | | |
| 8 | 7382728 | 2004/11/11 | 7822 | 32342 | 3902 | | | | |
| 13 | 7342934 | 2004/12/03 | 8323 | 23422 | 2031 | 9212 | 2934 | 2934 | 2982 |
| 18 | 7329491 | 2004/13/02 | 8291 | 92423 | 7922 | 0231 | 2342 | 2355 | 2223 |
| 22 | 7328438 | 2004/12/22 | 8399 | 92311 | | 0289 | 8392 | | 3982 |
As you can see above, the row count numbers are not lining up at all, it starts at 1, then jumps 2 every count then all of a sudden jumps 5 per line...a pattern that is interesting but difficult to understand. The unique value in this matrix is that serial number but even though i group it by the serial number, it still gives me the funny Row count values.
What would be the approach to solving this?
Regards
Mike
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 1999
How do I get a list of table names and their sizes, sorted by sizes? The command sp_spaceused only lists one table at a time.
Thanks for your help.
Lan.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 27, 2014
So if an item is a bottle, it will have a unique BottleKey and Null for CaseKey and if an item is a Case, it will have a unique CaseKey and Null for BottleKey. However, the PrimaryIDs are the same for both the bottle and case. I get the results to look like this:
Bottlekey CaseKey PrimaryID
4754 NULL ABC-234
NULL 5465 ABC-234
.... .... .......
Is there a way to get the result sorted by Primary ID?
So that the rows are halved from what we have in the table above and the results look like
PrimaryID CaseKey BottleKey
ABC-234 5465 4754
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 16, 2005
All in the subject.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 2007
I'm doing a data conversion with one of my fields (SUMDWK) from one of the tables that will be used in a merge join. With the new, converted field, I do a look up. From this look up, I want to take a new field FiscalWeekOfYear, and replace the original field, SUMDWK. This is necessary because SUMDWK is one of the sorted fields. In the look up, it is not possible to change the Output Alias. Does anybody know a way around this? Thanks.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Dec 25, 2007
i ran a preview of a matrix based report whose column headers are dates. The dates seem to be displaying in a somewhat (not completely) random order from left to right. How can I ensure that they display chronologically from left to right?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 16, 2015
Why Merge Transformation Need to Sorted Inputs?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 4, 2015
I need to load the latest csv files from file server , The files are placed in a folder called -
Posted 02022015- --> csv files .
I am able to copy the csv files from filserver using bulk insert (manually) , giving the file location
I am having difficulty picking up the latest folder which is posted on the server and import it into database using a stored proc .
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2007
How do I stop a remote query that INSERTS into a local table from being automatically "upgraded" to a distributed transaction?
I am using Windows 2000 server and SQL Server 2000 SP3a on both machines.
I am executing the following statement in Query analyzer.
INSERT MyLocalServer (col1)
EXECUTE MyRemoteServer.Master.dbo.sp_executesql
@RemoteQuery,
@ParameterDefinition,
@Paramter = 'somevalue'
@RemoteQuery consists of a SELECT four-table join, all tables are on the same linked server.
The Linked server has been set up on MyLocalServer using the "Microsoft OLE DB for SQL Server" provider. In the "Provider Options" for the linked server properties I checked "Non transacted updates" and "dynamic parameters". In the "Server Options" tab I have checked "RPC", "RPC Out", "Data Access".
The EXECUTE part of the query runs great (and returns the data very fast) by itself. But with the INSERT part, the query fails and returns the error:
"Server: Msg 7391, Level 16, State 1, Line 17
The operation could not be performed because the OLE DB provider 'SQLOLEDB' was unable to begin a distributed transaction.
[OLE/DB provider returned message: New transaction cannot enlist in the specified transaction coordinator. ]
OLE DB error trace [OLE/DB Provider 'SQLOLEDB' ITransactionJoin::JoinTransaction returned 0x8004d00a]."
The two servers are seperated by firewalls, so I believe the reason the query is failing is that I haven't followed the procedures for setting up the ports etc described in one of the microsoft support articles: e.g.: 250367.
Configuring the ports involves too much company politics, and besides, for what this query does, it does not need the benefits of a distributed transaction.
How can I execute my query without SQL Server automatically trying to upgrade it to a distributed transaction?
More Info: I can execute the query as a straight INSERT/SELECT linked-server query and it does the INSERT on the local SQL Server just like I want it to, so I assume it is not trying to use distributed transactions; but it takes around 7 seconds to run even though the entire SELECT is executed on the linked server, whereas executing with sp_executesql takes only 1 second.
I thought selected "non-transacted updates" in the provider would solve this problem, but it did not.
Anyone know the answer?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2001
I have table A and table B. i want if table A add records, automatically table b add records too.
thanks,
andi
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 2, 2000
I'm looking for a way to get the name of the server on which the DTS package lives.
I copy packages between servers. The problem is that everytime a package is copied
to different server, I have to change the reference in the connection strings to point
to the new server name. I'd like to find an automatic way to interrogate the server
name where the package currently lives and dynamically change connection strings
from within an ActiveX task. That would cut maintenance way down.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 7, 2002
I installed SQL Sp2 and at the same time took Carbon Copy off. No when the machine comes up neither SQL Server or the Agent will not come up. If I go to Service manager I can start both just fine. Nothing in either log to show why. Anyplace or any thoughts
View 2 Replies
View Related
