Hi !
I need to maintain a record such as how many time any user (e.g, sa) connects to the sql server. Means whenever any person is connecting to the database through application or directly, then i need to know that through which sql user(e.g sa), any body connected.
Regards,
Shabber Abbas Rizvi.
I have uploaded my site on localhost and sharing on intranethow can i answer these question? Q1) How many users have loggedin? and using my database?Q2) Which table has lots of load?Q3) how can i immediately close particularly connection?
View 4 Replies View RelatedIs there a utility that will allow me to see what users on my network areconnected/active on SQL server?Ryan
View 4 Replies View RelatedBeginning this morning, when I look in Current Activity in our SQL 6.5 Server, all trusted user connections to my server are showing up under "SA".
We are running mixed security. Most of the connections are through ODBC. We have applied SP5a to SQL.
As far as I know, nothing in SQL has changed. From what others are telling me, nothing in NT or the network has changed.
Something is up. What am I missing? Where can I look?
Please help.
Hi everyone,
I have one Inventory system which is in VB6 and SQL Server 2000.
In my database there is table of users and userrights.
These are my application users. They are nothing to do with Windows users and SQL Server users. I am connecting to database using 'sa' login.
Now I want to display all my online users. I tried with @@SPID to manage their but not getting the exact results.
Thanks in advance.
Riyaz
We have a existing backup, re-index job that runs at night on anexisting database that is now accessed by web users 24/7.Problem is that one of the steps is to kill all users before backupstarts so it kills any transactions that are happening at that timequestion is... Can users be connected during a backup? Will removingthe kill users step slow the backup alot?any other suggestions would be appreciated.thanks
View 1 Replies View Relatedsorry about asking basic question, just slipped out of my mind,
how to get the list of currently connected users on one database and on whole server in sql server 2005
thanks,
Hi,
I need to be able to list all User connected to a particular database, after doing a bit of playing I have writen a simple view in the database to show this information which looks like
select spid, status, loginame, hostname, blocked, db_name(dbid), cmd from master..sysprocesses where db_name(dbid) = 'AutoCost2008
But my problem is that as this needs to be run from an application where the user is logged on as a standard user and therefore when this is run it only shows the current user, I am not sure what permissions I need to give this login to allow them to view all users connected to this database without giving them full Admin permissions, can anyone please help.
Thanks,
Gavin,
I have a web application that runs on IIS on Windows XP professional. I have reached the max number of connections to the IIS website. So, I tried the approach of disabling HTTP Keep-Alives.
All is fine and dandy until my Business Intelligence Studio report project attempts to set the parameters for a report using report viewer at which point I get the following error message:
"The request failed with http status 401: access denied."
How can I fix this? I have posted this over at the asp.net forums, but I figured I would check here to see if anyone else has solved this problem.
Is it possible/advisable to change this setting with users connected? There are a number of web based users and an agent job running every 30 seconds.
USE [master]
GO
ALTER DATABASE [Bla] SET AUTO_SHRINK OFF WITH NO_WAIT
I am wondering how people maintain their SQL Servers which run at several customers sites and disk space is getting smaller and smaller? I want to say that we have tables in SQL dbs which hold a lot of date consisting of statistics, errors, logs etc.
They grow and grow and existing data is not needed anymore as soon as the data get older than let's say for one year. How do you overcome the problem reducing the tables but not charging the system too much as the major application also runs on the same server?
Thanks for any input
mipo
What are the basic processes for maintaining an SQL SERVER 2005 Database?
Is there a top ten list of things you should do periodically to all SQL SERVER 2005 databases?
When I try to connect to my SQL server I get the following error.
Microsoft SQL Enterprise Manager
A connection could not be established to MLM1-[SQL Server] Cant allocate space for object 'Syslogs' in database 'tempdb' because the 'logsegment' segment is full. If you ran space in syslogs dump the transaction log. Otherwise use ALTER DATABASE or sp_extendsegment to increase the size of the segment.
Ok, I am not up on SQL so I'm not sure how to dump my tempdb database. I have a coworker that has only done this sort of thing in the Enterprise Manager and we can't get there. So how do I do this and make sure that I don't blow away any data? Also if I do dump my tempdb will this cure my problems and how do I avoid having this happen again?
Any help would be greatly appreciated,
Jeb
using vs2005 to build web pages of asp.net 2.0, The database is SQL Server 2000,.But I always fail to connect.
using the following configuration in web.config:
<appSettings> <add key="DSN_student" value="server=(local);uid=admin;pwd=123456;database=network_course"/> </appSettings>
I also failed to connect using the following configuration in web.config:
<add name="network_courseConnectionString1" connectionString="Data Source=(local);Initial Catalog=network_course;User ID=admin;Password=123456;" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
I am a beginner from China and eager to get answers! Thank you!
I am using SQL Server 2005 Express + SP1 on a Windows Small Business Server(SBS) box. The SBS is connected to a client thru LAN.
Following are what I gave as IP address and DNS on the server:
IP: 192.168.16.2, subnet mask : 255.255.255.0, Preferred DNS server: 192.168.16.2, Default gateway and Alternate DNS Server blank
On the client, I have,
IP: 192.168.16.4, subnet mask : 255.255.255.0, Preferred DNS server, Default gateway and Alternate DNS Server blank
I can ping and connect to either of the machines.
If I do a sqlcmd -S "tcp:servernameINSTANCE,port", I get the following error message:
HResult 0x80090304, Level 16, State 1
SQL Network Interfaces: The Local Security Authority cannot be contacted
Sqlcmd: Error: Microsoft SQL Native Client : Cannot generate SSPI context
If I do a sqlcmd -S "tcp:192.168.16.2INSTANCE,port", it connects to SQL Server.
I have the Windows Firewall ON. If I Off the firewall, I do not have any problem at all.
I included File and Printer Sharing, sqlsvr.exe in the Exception list of the Windows Firewall.
Any help to solve the issue is appreciated.
Thanks.
I have a query that finds all SPID's connected to a particular database:
select d.name, p.*
from sys.databases d join sys.sysprocesses p
on d.database_id = p.dbid
where d.name = 'my_db'
But now we have a new rule that we should not use outdated compatibility views, and one of them is sys.sysprocesses. I checked sys.dm_exec_connections/session/requests but failed to replace my existing code. The first two don't have dbid, the last one, requests, has it, but it selects only currently executing statements.
I have read that if I change "computer name" and then try to startup sql server it will recognize the changes automatically BUT you need to execute sp_dropserver and sp_addserver procedures too in order to set all thing right.But yesterday I tried it on a Personal edition on xp and after reboot sql server came up without any problem and I could connec it without executing sp_dropserver and sp_addserver! Was it a specific situation or no need to those SPs at all?
View 10 Replies View RelatedRecently I needed to find all processes connected to a particular database, let's call it Test_db. I have a simple query to find all connections to my database:
select *
from sys.databases d join sys.sysprocesses p
on d.database_id = p.dbid
where d.name = 'test_db'
But there was a process that was connected to another database like USE another_db_name; but was actually selecting from tables in test_db. Is it possible to catch such connections?
Hi,i have a problem about the CLIENT-SERVER architecture procedure.Well , i have an application in VB with ADO connection to a table in adatabase on a SQLSERVER 7.0 .Is possible to do that when a client updates a data in a field of my table ,the SERVER communicates to all clients connected to my table that this dataare updated , without the client do anything , for example without aclient-timer to control the data in the server ???thanks
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have an information retrieval application in which there is a single connection to a database followed by multiple table open, read, and close commands. Response time is consistantly less than 1 second on a LAN.
When Internet connected (not VPN), the first table read is typically fast, but the response time becomes slower and slower after multiple table open, read, and close commands. There seems to be a considerable amount of handshaking based on monitoring of the router's status lights.
Hello all,
When I close a web form that has a connection to my SQL Server, I am not seeing the memory process close in task manager (of the SQL Server). I am using the "open late close early" theory of database connections. I am using the "close" method for my database connections. Is there any automated utility that will shut down these processes? I thought when the user was disconnected from the database, the memory process would automatically shut down.
Any suggestions, thoughts, or ideas?
TYIA,
lonelobo
I have a website I'm ready to test on the server it will call home. I just got connected to the remote SQL server that it will be using. As I've been creating the site, I've been using the default SQL Express set-up in Visual Studio. Is there a way to have Visual Studio create all those default tables, procedures, etc. OR is there a way to copy all of that stuff from the SQL Express running on my machine to the remote SQL Server 2005?
-Mathminded
Hello ,
Is possible to specify reationships between tables on SQL Server Compact Edition database in Management Studio Express ?
I can connect to database file , add tables, add data , but I dont't found the right methot to specify reationships as with SQL Server Express.
Any ideas?
Does anyone know if this is a SQL Native Client bug? I've read a previous thread (posted back on Jan. 18th, 2007) about this error, but there are no replies. I am getting this error when I issue the sp_setapprole command using sqlexecdirect() ODBC api call. Is there any way to work around this? Or is there a fix to the SQL Native Client? The error 15002 message text states "The procedure sys.sp_setapprole cannot be executed within a transaction". This is on a new connection so there should be no transactions active at the time. Thanks in advance for any info anyone can provide on this.
View 5 Replies View Relatedhi ,
i am working on an application using c#, visual studio 2005, sql server 2005.
i have a few tables in sql server 2005.
i need to save the history. (i.e) all the inserts, updates, and deleats performed on the tables.
can any one suggest me how can i achieve that.
should i use triggers and save the changes in another table ???
waiting for your suggestion??
thank you
Please what is the best way to perform index maintenance. I use 7.0
We have been having slow server performance, and one of the options is to do index maintenance. I have researched but could not get a clear picture of what I should do. Has anybody performed the same task before? Thanks for your help!!!
Hello Friends,
Iam new to this sql server arena. I have implemented a procedure which does a series of insert and update statements and all of this statements must be implemented all at once or none. But if I got error in some statements , the rest of the statements are been executed. Please suggest me a way or code snippet to achieve atomicity in a sqlserver procedure.
regards,
Ch.Praveen Kumar.
Scenario:
For the most part we let SQL Server (2005) maintain our statistics for us. However we do have several large processes written in stored procedures. There is one main controller procedure that can call any number of other procedures. This process can take anywhere from 5 minutes to an hour+ to run (based on the size of the client). Back in the day of SQL Server 2000 we found that the performance of this procedure would diminish over time (while it was running). We implemented a queued concept of issuing UPDATE STATISTICS commands. This was done by adding a SQL Server job that ran every 10 minutes looking for new records in a table. Records where inserted at key points in these stored procedures (after large deletes, updates, inserts).
Goal:
Now, with all that background and with 2005, I'd like to review this concept and remove this implementation if possible, or at least remove the close association of maintaining the statistics from the business jobs. In 2005, are there better ways to monitor and maintain statistics at more of an administrative (but automated) way?
Our database(s) are all over the place - no documentation - lot's ofrubbish and unused stuff.I'm managing a project focusing on data quality that covers codechanges, alterations to DTS packages, schema changes etc etc.What I'd like to do is see where the bit I want to change is beingused.that might mean what stored procs use a field and what sprocs use thatsproc.maybe it's which dts packages use a sproc (and again up thehieararchy)The list is a long one but basically I need to know what the effectsare of changes.Is there a tool out there that lets me navigate a database to thatlevel of detail - I understand something along the same lines isavailable for MS Access but I can't find it for SQL Server.Thanks
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am a beginer in SQL Server. I have developed a simple accounting application in VB and SQL. Now I have successfully completed my application. Now I want to deploy it to my client. So I installed SQl Server and required VB components in the clients computer. I also created 'sa' login and secret password only know by me. I thought my data in that clients computer was full safe but later on i found that we can also connect to the sql server using the NT administrative account and easily change the data of the database. So now I am worried that if someone enters and access the clients computer with administrator's password then he/she can change my data resulting the corruption of the data. So is there any way that I can prevent the access the database to the client with the NT administrative account or any way 2 track the way the data changed?
View 5 Replies View Relatedhi all,
i am working on portal site where i have created 18 tables in on database, i dont know weather i am right or wrong . Should i continue with the same or create two tables one will be master and another will contain common fields.
but if i will create one table for all then what will happend.
please tell me what to do and why?
asap please............
Thanks for spending ur valuable time for me.
Hello,I am fairly new at stored procedures. I have created some that willgo through a table and return a start date and an end date that isdependent upon the fiscal period you want, but I then need to usethose dates in another stored procedure to retrieve the information Ineed. My stored procedure looks like this.================================================== ====================CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.R920ExtTotal@MthsBack Decimal OUTPUTASDECLARE @sSQL AS NVARCHAR(255), @StartDate as SMALLDATETIME, @EndDateas SMALLDATETIMEExec @StartDate = GetMthStart @MthsBackExec @EndDate = GetMthEnd @MthsBackSET @sSQL = 'Select count(extension) as Total From r920f00 Where([date] BETWEEN "' +CONVERT(nvarchar, @StartDate) +'" and "' +CONVERT(nvarchar, @EndDate) +'")'Select @sSQLEXEC (@sSQL)ReturnGO================================================== ===============The problem is my variables @StartDate and @EndDate do not retaintheir values after the EXEC statement and revert to 01/01/1900. Howcan I get around this problem?Thanks!!!!Chip
View 2 Replies View RelatedHello,I have a large set of data that I have set up as a partitioned view.The view is partitioned by a datetime column and the individual tableseach represent one month's worth of data. I need to keep at least twoyear's worth of data at all times, but after two years I can archivethe data. A sample of the code used is below. It is simplified forspace reasons.My question is, how do other people maintain the database in this typeof scenario? I could create all of the tables necessary for the nextyear and then go through that at the end of each year (archive tablesover two years, add new tables, and change the view), but I was alsothinking that I might be able to write a stored procedure that runsonce a month and does all three of those tasks automatically. It seemslike a lot of dynamic SQL code though for something like that.Alternatively, I could write VB code to handle it in a DTS package.So, my question again is, how are others doing it? Any suggestions?Thanks!-Tom.CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Station_Events_200401] ([event_time] [datetime] NOT NULL ,[another_column] [char] (8) NOT NULL )GOCREATE TABLE [dbo].[Station_Events_200402] ([event_time] [datetime] NOT NULL ,[another_column] [char] (8) NOT NULL )GOCREATE VIEW Station_EventsASSELECT event_time,another_columnFROM Station_Events_200401UNION ALLSELECT event_time,another_columnFROM Station_Events_200402GO
View 3 Replies View Related