Merge Replication Using A Guid As A Dynamic Filter
Aug 12, 2006
Hi ...
I am working on a project where the server version of application has vouchers from different entities. I have created a publication manually. My next step was to create a client subscription using rmo and to execute a pull. This part works fine. Code samples from http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms147314.aspx
My next step would be to implement dynamic filtering using the guid of the entity as a parameter.
I dont want to use suser_sname() or host_name() as I want to use a fixed login for the replication for all users, and a client could have several host dbs (sql express, sql mobile)
My goal would be to pass a guid-value to the HostName Property of the MergePullSubscription class and convert it to an uniquidentifier and use it as a filter as I have not found any other way to pass a guid as a filter.
RMO-Code:
subscription.HostName = "4bb0e468-c68a-4253-ba82-f71c3a6e302d"
Filter:
SELECT <published_columns> FROM [dbo].[voucher] WHERE [entity_ID] = dbo.fx_ConvertHostToEntity()
Function:
create function fx_ConvertHostToEntity()
returns uniqueidentifier
as
Begin
declare @host nvarchar(50)
set @host = host_name()
declare @entity uniqueidentifier
set @entity = cast( @host as uniqueidentifier)
return @entity
End
When trying to set the filter sql server complains that a character string cannot be casted to a uniqueidentifier - so i can not set this filter. Is there a way to pass a parameter other then the username or the hostname as a filter?
SELECT <published_columns> FROM [dbo].[voucher] WHERE [entity_ID] =@entity, where @entity is a guid
Thanks for your support
Alex
View 6 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 2, 2007
If anyone could confirm...
SQL Server 2000 SP4 to multiple SQL Server 2005 Mobile Edition on PDAs. My DB on SQL2k is published with a single dynamic row filter using host_name() on my 'parent' table and also join filters from parent to child tables. The row filter uses joins to other tables elsewhere that are not published to evaluate what data is allowed through the filter.
E.g. Published parent table that contains suppliers names, etc. while child table is suppliers' products. The filter queries host_name(s) linked to suppliers in unpublished table elsewhere.
First initial sync with snapshot is correct and as I expected - PDA receives only the data from parent (and thus child tables) that matches the row filter for the host_name provided.
However - in my scenario host_name <--> suppliers may later be updated E.g. more suppliers assigned to a PDA for use or vice versa. But when I merge the mobile DB, the new data is not downloaded? Tried re-running snapshot, etc., no change.
Question: I thought the filters would remain dynamic and be applied on each sync?
I run a 'harmless' update on parent table using TSQL e.g. "update table set 'X' = 'X'" and re-sync. Now the new parent records are downloaded - but the child records are not!
Question: I wonder why if parent records are supplied, why not child records?
If I delete existing DB and sync new, I get the updated snapshot and all is well - until more data added back at server...
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Is it possible (or not) to have dynamic filters run during second or subsequent merge?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 14, 2006
Brand new to SQL Server 2005 and replication, I was able to use online books info to get a replication topology set up (using wizards) and successfully replicate an article (a single table) to a SQL Server Express database.
I then cleared the subscription table and added a simple dynamic filter (colx = SUSER_SNAME()), which I can't get to work. Based on what I read, I'm thinking that SUSER_SNAME() is not returning the proper value because the merge agent is set to connect to the publisher and distributor by 'impersonating the process account'. This is on the subscription merge agent security form. However, 'using a SQL Server login' is greyed out and nothing I tried will enable it, including setting up logins and SQL user ids on the publisher and playing with entries on the publication properties data partitions page, etc.
I think that I have discovered only some of the pieces that I need and not enough details to find the rest and put them together. Any info on what to have set up where would be appreciated. Any suggestions for 'step by step' information that would help in addition to SQL Server 2005 Books Online would be great.
Thanks in advance.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Feb 2, 2007
Hi!
I'm a merge newbie and have a couple of questions. I'm about to setup a merge replication with Sql Server 2005 and Sql Server CE as a subscriber. Situation is like this, we have 10 service technicians using pda.
I want to each pda user have their own data. What I understand I need to use dynamic filter and SUSER_NAME()?? Do I need to create a "translation" table to map my system's UserId against SUSER_NAME? How have you solved this problem?
/Magnus
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 26, 2015
We have a table in an SQL Server 2012 database that stores tree-like structures. Simplified for the purpose of my question, it has the following format:
Id int identity,
ParentId int,
GroupId int
Each record of the table represents an object identified by Id. An object may or may not have a parent in the same table, such that object.ParentId = parentObject.Id. A root object has ParentId = NULL. There are multiple root objects, so the table in fact stores multiple trees. What’s important is that the tree depth is not fixed, i.e. theoretically there can be any number of ancestor generations for an object. GroupId is a property of a root object; in theory none of the children of a root object has to have GroupId <> NULL; it can be assumed that any child has the same GroupId value as its root object.
A sample table having two roots (one grandparent and one parent), one non-root parent/child and 4 child roots:
Id ParentId GroupId
----------------------------------------------------------
1 NULL 200 root grandparent
2 1 NULL non-root parent/child
3 2 NULL child
4 2 NULL child
5 NULL 300 root parent
6 5 NULL child
7 5 NULL child
The table is not normalised, i.e. there’s no separate {root_object : group} table. However I don’t think normalising the table would solve the problem.
Now the problem. We need to set up merge replication from the table above (Master table) to the table of the same format in another DB. We need to replicate only those rows of the Master table that have a certain fixed GroupId value, e.g. 200 in the example above. If we ensure that GroupId in all descendant objects of a root object has the same value in the table as the root object itself that would be trivial. The table would look like this:
Id ParentId GroupId
----------------------------------------------------------
1 NULL 200 root grandparent
2 1 200 non-root parent/child
3 2 200 child
4 2 200 child
5 NULL 300 root parent
6 5 300 child
7 5 300 child
And the filter would look like this:
WHERE GroupId = 200
However out of performance considerations, we would like to avoid if possible filling GroupId for the descendant objects, because as it must be clear from the above, GroupId for a descendant object is quite easily deducible via a stored procedure or UDF (just need to go up the tree until ParentId = NULL). The problem is, I don’t know how to achieve this in a merge replication filter: it would only allow WHERE conditions and joins. I’ve have not had much luck with joins for merge replication in general, but here we have more complex algorithm, because the number of tree levels can be different for every object. And merge replication would not allow using UDF…
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 5, 2005
Hi,
I would like to setup a merge replication from a main database (publisher), to around 100 client databases (subscribers), that contain only subset information for each distinct client: each client has then its own database to view and modify its own data (Filtered on rows and columns). The client databases will initially be hosted on the same SQL server Instance.
I don't want to setup manually 100 publications with static filters, and more may come in the future: a pain to setup and maintain because I have to configure the tables, the columns and the row filters (and joins) each time.
I would like then to setup one publication with a dynamic filter, to filter in a way or another on a specific client. Creating subscribers becomes then a piece of cake. The dynamic filter would apply based on a property specific to the client, but... HOW?
Filtering on HOST_NAME() will not work because several subscribers are on the same server.
Filtering on SUSER_SNAME() will not work because merge agent will always use the same user name for connecting to the publisher (using push subcription, all merge agents are on the same server), and I have not find out how it can be configured by merge agent: even if the merge agent jobs have different owner, it is always the SQL Server Agent login that is used to connect to the publisher (I am using windows authentication).
I was thinking about using DB_NAME(), and have specific db name for each client DB, but DB_NAME() provides the name of the publisher DB, not the subscriber DB. etc ...
What could I use in this case to dynamically filter on client data without having to fall into heavy replication administration and setup.
Thanks for your help,
Best regards
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 22, 2002
Does SQL Server 2000 (Enterprise Edition), mandate the creation of a GUID on each table used in transactional replication?
I was told that in addition to defining a Primary Key, I "MUST" also define a GUID on each table. As I recall - this is not true. Can someone who's setup Transactional Replication please field this question?
thx -
~BT
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2006
I am currently running sql 2000 with 2 way merge replication... I have a problem of I need to delete about 3 million rows from a table that is constantly being accessed buy an e-commerce site. I have thought about setting up a filter to only replicate new or altered rows beyond a a certain indexed number... then delete from both sites the unneeded rows... this should work.. but can I delete the filter after I am done??
If this is not an option, any other suggestions?? I cannot take either site offline and I cannot do anything that will take more than a few seconds to replicate... by deleting these rows. my table size will be reduced by almost 8GB...
thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2007
Hi,
I have a merge (SQL 2005 Standard -> Express) topolgoy which is having problems
The main problem is that the join filters don't seem to work for one area and I am hoping someone can help me with some troubleshooting advice
There are 140+ tables in the topology but the ones causing particular pain are a parent child relationship where the child is actually a bridge/linking table to another table.
Therefore although it is a parent child in the replication filters it is the reverse. i.e. the child has the paramterised filter on it and the parent is one level down joined by it's id. There are other tables joined to this parent table but it stays at three levels deep. The @join_unique_key therefore is set to 0 as is the partition options for the parent /child relationship.
However, when we synchronise we have a problem. The rows get inserted in to the database in RI order but only the child records are replicated down to the subscriber.
The child table with the parameterised filter has 13 articles joined to it in total and one of the other branches of join filters go down as deep as four levels. Most though do not.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to why this might be happening? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers, James
P.S. I should add this problem only occurs when the edits are made at the publisher. If new records are added at the subscriber everything is fine.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2007
Here is what I am trying to do in SSRS 2005.
Setting up filters based on parameters with an expression like this:
=Iif(Parameters!Company.Value = "", "", Fields!company.Value)
In the wizard we are creating, we are also letting the user choose the operator for each parameter that they choose. My question is how can I change the filter dynamically based on the user choosing a specific parameter and also choosing an operator to associate with that parameter??
Example 1: User 1 chooses the Company parameter to filter their report, and they choose the parameter to equal (=) a specific value. So the filter expression would be like the one previously mentioned and the operator would be an equal sign.
Example 2: User 2 chooses the Company parameter to filter their report, and they choose the parameter to be LIKE a specific value. So the filter expression would be like the one previously mentioned and the operator would be LIKE.
How can I do this?
Thanks in advance for your help.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2006
Hi!
Is there any way to use datetime value as dynamic filter in the Merge Replication?
(Yeah, I use HOST_NAME in order to pass datetime value)
I used all possible approaches, but or I got the error
Conversion failed when converting datetime from character string. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 241)
or I got 0 rows on the subscriber after synchronization.
Any ideas how it can be solved?
Thanks
Paul
View 11 Replies
View Related
Feb 28, 2007
I have a requirement to add the ability to filter a report by partial last name, at the report level (i.e. not at the database server). In case someone else needs to work out how to do this, here is what I did.
Add a Parameter to the report. In my case it is named LastName, is non-queried, allows Null or Blank, and has a default of null.
Add a filter to the dataset that contains the field to be searched. Set its Expression to:
=IIF(Parameters!LastName.Value = System.DBNull.Value OR Parameters!LastName.Value = "",
Fields!LastName.Value, Nothing) ,
its operator to "="
and its value to =IIF(Parameters!LastName.Value = Nothing OR Parameters!LastName.Value = "", Nothing, Parameters!LastName.Value & "*")
voila!
Helen
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2006
I have several SQL Mobile devices (WM5) syncronizing with a SQL 2005 database through merge replication. We are using the HOST_NAME parameter to filter several tables. A few of these filters use a sub-query to filter the data because of the complexity of the filter (need to do more than join to one table). The subquery will use the HOST_NAME parameter. For example, I want to get a list of all users in the current user's company I need to use host_name to get the current user, find their company ID, then filter the user table on that company ID.
Everything works fine until a user is removed from the table. In that case, the delete statement is not replicated to the device until they reinitialize the mobile database.
Thanks for the help!!
Mike
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 10, 2015
I have a table:
declare tableName table
(
uniqueid int identity(1,1),
id int,
starttime datetime2(0),
endtime datetime2(0),
parameter int
)
A stored procedure has new set of values for a given id. Sometimes the startime and endtime are the same, in which case I update the value of parameter. Sometimes I add a new time range (insert statement), and sometimes I delete a time range (delete statement).
I had a question on merge, with insert, delete and update and I got that resolved. However I have a different question regarding performance of the merge statement.
If my target table has hundreds of millions of records and I want to delete/update/insert a handful of records, will SQL server scan the entire target table? I can't have:
merge ( select * from tableName where id = 10 ) as target
using ...
and I can't have:
merge tableName as target
using [my query] as source on
source.id = target.id and
source.starttime = target.startime and
source.endtime = target.endtime
where target.id = 10
...
This means I cannot filter the set of rows in the target table to a handful of records where id = 10.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 26, 2015
What is the main difference between snapshot and transactional and merge replication?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2007
Hi all,
I know that adding a column using ALTER TABLE to add a column automatically allows SQLSERVER 2005 to replicate the schema changes to the subscribers, however, I would like to add a new column to an existing article that is being used for merge replication, however, I don't want this column to be replicated. Re-initialising the subscriptions is not a option. Help would be appreciated.
I am using SQLSERVER 2005 (SP1).
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2008
Im using SQL 2005 SP2 as the publisher and SQL Mobile subscribers and Im convinced I have found a replication bug .....but maybe Im just being stupid!
I have an account manager table which links to companies and users.
The organisation table use a nasty @subset_filterclause filter against the account management table to decide what records to retrieve for each subscriber.
This works fine and updates either way are replicated as you would expect.
However when an account manager is changed and the organisation no longer fulfils the filter criteria, it is not removed from the subscriber (unless I delete the db and download it from scratch)
Surely this is a bug?
Just to clarify the filter clause was ok, I added the account management table to the filtered tables using the exact same @subset_filterclause.
Now when I change an account manager, the account management reocrd is correctly removed from the subscriber but the organisation record remains on the subscriber? Have I missed something obvious?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 13, 2006
Hi All,
I've done my replication successfully between SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server CE. But how if I want to filter my replication?
For example :- At Table1 have 5 field which is UserID,Month,Year,Price,ItemCode
I want to filter replication data with UserID and Month and Year. How can I do it?
Thank you!!
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2007
Hi!
I have a WM5 device with Sql Server CE 3.0 and Sql Server 2005 on the serverside. I set up RDA and it works fine until I try do pull a little more advanced query. Instead of pulling a simple table with where clause I created a query that joined two tables returning values from only one. It doesn't seem to be possible, is it? If it's not, is it someway I work around this?
/Magnus
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 13, 2007
Hi All,I have a table with a column DeletedDate which stores a logical deleteof a record.I need to set up transactional replication for reporting purposes thatthis deleted records should not be replicated to the subscriber. Thatis, if i see a value on the DeletedDate, I don't want that record tobe picked up for replication.At the same time, when someone marks the record for deletion (byputting a date on the DeleteDate column), I want that record to bedeleted on the subscriber database. (I can also set up a job to do thedeletes on the subscriber but i'd rather let the replication take careof it).Can this scenario be implemented in Microsoft SQL 2000? I wouldappreciate any ideas / thoughts in this matter.Thanks in advance,Aravin Rajendra.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 9, 2007
I am working on bringing our disaster recovery site to be a live site. Currently we replicate to one of out servers (server B) with merge replication (from server A). Server A also does one way transactional replication form some table to several other servers including servers at the DR site.
This setup is not going to be fast enough for what we need so I am wondering if a table is receiving merge replication will the merge updates also replicate down the transaction path??
Example...
Server B update a row and merges to Server A. With this update them replicate (via transactional) to Server C??
thanks...
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 25, 2008
Hello,
I have data coming in from two sources, one being SQL and the other being Oracle. The end result needs to be a CSV file with the columns in a specific order. I have a Data Flow task setup that takes both sources and does a Merge Join on them. I can add a Sort Transformation and manually set the sorting of all 156 columns that end up going to a CSV file destination. However, I have a table setup that holds the names of the 156 columns and the order that the CSV file expects them to be in. I would much rather do this step dynamically as the column names and order may change in the future. Anyone who has used the Sort Transformation for a large number of columns knows how tedious it can be and how adding a column in the middle will cause you to change the sort # for each of the columns that come after it.
So I added a Script Component between the Merge Join and the Flat File Destination hoping that I could alter the order of the columns there. However I added the following code and found that the SortKeyPosition is ReadOnly.
Public Overrides Sub Input0_ProcessInputRow(ByVal Row As Input0Buffer)
Dim column As IDTSInputColumn90
For Each column In Me.ComponentMetaData.InputCollection(0).InputColumnCollection
column.SortKeyPosition = 1
Next
End Sub
I was hoping to add some code to get the sort index from my table for each of the columns and set it to the SortKeyPosition. Has anyone out there done this before or seen an example that might point me in the right direction? I've searched for 2 days without coming up with much.
Thanks!
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2007
We have Merge Replication publications for SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition subscribers.
Some articles have filter statements that send rows to multiple subscribers, based on the value of Host_Name() supplied at run-time.
Our publications work for most subscribers, but we have at least one subscriber who downloads too many rows from one of the filtered tables.
When we run the Select SQL from the article's Filter statement it returns the intended 4 rows for this subscriber.
We cut and pasted the filter statement into query analyzer, substituted the subscriber's value for Host_Name(), executed the statement, and got the proper 4 rows for this subscriber in the results.
But when this subscriber syncs her Compact Edition database it downloads 10 rows - the proper 4 rows that the filter statement should pass, plus 6 other rows that she should not download.
Our hypothesis is that the Filter statement is not properly applied to the article when this subscriber syncs.
Other subscribers get the proper rows when they sync, so the publication's filter statement works in some cases, for some values of Host_Name().
We'd like to see the application of the filter statement at run-time (sync-time), but we have not found the text of the filter statement in SQL Profiler output. Should we expect to see the text of the filter statement in SQL Profiler output?
Is there a better way to debug this error?
FYI, here's the text of the article filter statement:
SELECT <published_columns> FROM [dbo].[TBL_USER] WHERE user_sys_id in (
select u.user_sys_id
from tbl_user u
join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid
where t.terr_no_id like (
select
case (select t.data_access_qnty from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = Host_Name())
when 2 then (select t.terr_no_id from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = Host_Name())
when 3 then (select left(t.terr_no_id,5)+'%' from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = Host_Name())
end
)
)
And here's the statement we ran from Query Analyzer:
declare @id varchar(10)
select @id = 'aultnc'
SELECT * FROM [dbo].[TBL_USER] WHERE user_sys_id in (
select u.user_sys_id
from tbl_user u
join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid
where t.terr_no_id like (
select
case (select t.data_access_qnty from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = @id)
when 2 then (select t.terr_no_id from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = @id)
when 3 then (select left(t.terr_no_id,5)+'%' from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = @id)
end
)
)
Thanks
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2015
I am working on to convert my static Store procedure to Dynamic.
I have created a Store procedure with Merge statement which is inserting new record and updating existing record.
This SP I will use in SSIS Insted of Data Flow Task I will run in Execute SQL Task.
Now my biggest problem is I dont know how to convert static code toi dynamic
Below is my Store procedure code.
As you can see my Source Query
I have a filemaster table as shown below which consist of Input filename,Source table ,Destination table and BBX expression.
Input_FilenameSourceTableName DestinationTableName BBxKeyDerExpr
CCTFB ImportBBxCctfb ArchiveBBxCctfb SUBSTRING(Col001,1,6)
CEMXR ImportBBxCemxr ArchiveBBxCemxr SUBSTRING(Col001,1,10)
In my source query I want to change the value of Source table ,Destination table and BBX expression dynamically on the basis of input file.
Purpose of making dynamic is that I have created separate sp for all the input, my clients want to have sungle dynamic sp which will execute on the basis of input file.this input file name I wil get fromm variable which i have created in SSIS Package.
Lets consider @File_name is the variable in package which store the file name
if file name is CCTFB then my query should take the Source table ,Destination table and BBX expression value from file master table.
Like that I have 100 of source query and evry query have diffrent number of columns. How can I change the column number in uodate and insert statement dynamically on run time.
CAST(SUBSTRING(Col001,1,6) + SUBSTRING(Col002,1,10) AS varchar(100)) :-It creates a key for comparing, this value i can take it from filemaster
HASHBYTES('MD5', CAST(CHECKSUM(Col001, Col002,Col003,Col004) AS varchar(max))) -here numberv of column need to be changed .
(SUBSTRING(SOURCE.Col001,1,6) + SUBSTRING(SOURCE.Col002,1,10)) this condition also i can take it from file master.
[Code] ....
I am able to get inserted and updated rowcount, but not able to get the matching records count.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2002
Hi everbody,
I setup the Merge Replication , it is working perfectly. But i have one problem now it is updating both ways. I nedd one way. Any body tell me which parameter i have to change.
Thanks in advance
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 12, 2002
Hi,
My production box is running on NT4.0,SP6, SQL Server7.0,SP2. We implemented Merge replication. Working fine last 7 months. Last weekend i disabled replication, Successfully removed Distributor and Publishor. After that try add new fileds but won't allowed me. It's give the error message. I Also found Some Conflict_tables found almost 20 tables. All system Tables. Can delete these these tables, if i delete any problem my database.
I added filelds many times but this time i got errors.
Please help me anybody.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 31, 2000
I have just installed replication on our production server to Merge Replicate with a Laptop server that will travel from time to time. I have now noticed that we cannot add or change any fields or attributes on the tables which are being replicated (which are all tables in the DB). This is a problem because we are changing and adding columns all of the time. Is there a way around this issue like shutting down the replication service or something? I have been unsuccessful in finding a way around this other than removing replication while we make changes.
Thank you in advance for any help!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2001
I have implemented a Merger replication on our development server and I get a fillowing error when I try to update one of the table in publisher.
"Transaction cannot start while in firehose mode"
What does this mean.
Thank You,
John
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 19, 2000
Hi,
I read some where that replication has two types conflict resolution, 1. row based and 2. Column based...
If I am right...
Can any one point me how to find out this option and how to set it up....
Thanks,
Mohammed.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 1999
Hi all,
I have a merge replication going between 4 servers. The problem is when ever I do some BCP transfer to one of the tables in one of the servers. It puts the data in that table. But that Data does not get replicated to any other server like it should.
Please Advice on what to do. Is there any option I am forgetting to set or something.
Thank you for all your time in advance.
Aziz
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2003
I have successfully tried merge replication on single server with 2 databases.
now i want to do the same with different servers,
when i create pull subcription on server 2 which user account should I use?
it is giving log in failure
i tried using windows admin account and also the 'sa' account.
please help me out
thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2004
Hi All,
I have posted this earlier and I am re-posting it simplifying what I had said.
The scenario is:
I have two sql server database instances with the same database schema and all. However, both of them have different data. I have not set them for replication at all. Now, I want to do merge replication between them such that the data between them could be syncronized.
When I do pull merge subscription I have two choices -
1.Bringing schema and data to subscriber from publisher
2.Not bringing the schema and data from publisher to subscriber.
Obviously, I chose the second choice. But upon syncronizing I dont see any data from publisher coming to subscriber and vice-versa. If I add new data to publisher and do syncronization, I can see ONLY the new data created after the replication setup in subscriber. If I add new data to subscriber and do syncronization then the new data is removed from subscriber and not propagated to publisher.
Is there any way I can make this work??
Niben
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jan 2, 2007
Hi,
I have just set up Merge replication, I have two servers, server A and server B, the merge replication worked successfully but I don't quite sure which databases should or should not replicated? If not, what other methods should I use?
I would really appreciated any comments or advice out there!
-whitebelt
View 14 Replies
View Related