Merge Join Not Matching Correctly
Mar 31, 2007
And by correctly, I mean the way it *should* match, of course.I've got 2 data sources, using a left outer join, matching 2 columns. Whatever is the right side of my table is never matching and returning data. Here's my basic setup:OLE DB Source 1 (table1)
Sel Name Order JoinKeyno UniqueID 1 yesyes Column1 0 no
...
OLE DB Source 2 (table2)
Sel Name Order JoinKeyyes ID 1 yesyes Columns 0 no
...
There is a link (arrow) between UniqueID and ID, and the join type is "Left Outer Join". When I execute the statement "SELECT * FROM Table1 LEFT JOIN TABLE2 ON TABLE1.UniqueID = Table2.ID", the data returns correctly to me. What am I missing with the properties I've set above with the merge join?
View 6 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 15, 2007
Hello,
I have 2 tables one is filtered and the other not. I am trying to do merge between them and everthing appears to work fine and I reacht he end where it says 'Applied the snapshot and merged 1 data change' but nothing really is changed or updated on either end.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2007
Hello,
I have 2 tables one is filtered and the other not. I am trying to do merge between them and everthing appears to work fine and I reacht he end where it says 'Applied the snapshot and merged 1 data change' but nothing really is changed or updated on either end.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 28, 2007
Hi all! Hope you can help us with this one. We installed SP 2 of Sql server 2005 few months ago, and that caused a strange problem with merge replication.
We have about 150 subscribers in one merge publisher, and 200.000 new rows generated each day (retail system). Most tables are filtered.
Replication and filtering works fine, except 0,1% --> 0,2% of rows are not replicated correctly. These "problem-rows" are always replicated correctly to the publisher database, but publisher can't always replicate these rows further to other subscribers. Before SP2 everything worked fine.
Same problem occurs with filtered and non-filtered tables.
SQL Server shows no errors or warnings, everything SEEMS to work fine.
We have to make "dummy"-updates (like update SALES set id=id) in publisher database, to wake up the replicator. And always after these dummy updates all problem-rows will be replicated correctly from the publisher to subscribers.
Why do we have to "wake up" the replicator time to time with dummy updates? Is there a bug in SP2?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2013
Two tables:
table #1 = timestamp, servername1(never changes), value(int)
Table #2 = timestamp, servername2(never changes), value(int)
What I need to do is merge the two tables into a single table based on the matching timestamp:
timestamp, servername1, servername2 as headers then values under
"1/1/1-1:10:1" , "10" , "10" - as an example
"1/1/1-1:20:1" , "20" , "21" - as an example
"1/1/1-1:30:1" , "1" , "5" - as an example
Powershell or MSSQL 2008 queries work.
I have a powershell script atm that can create the table and then throw it back into the database but its very slow because of the amount of records.
The table is for some performance stat collection app.
Table #1 records a timestamp, the servername (which is the same over and over in the table) and the value of the performance object.
Table #2 is the same collection but for a different server.
The layout in the database is terrible but this is what I get to work with.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 28, 2008
I have been assigned to write a report that queries 3 tables. Table Store, Store_ID unique index, Cust table Cust_ID non unique index, CUST_Store_ID relates to Store Table, Table Emp, Emp_ID non unique index, Emp_Store_ID relates to Store Table
The problem is that the Employes and the customer don't relate to each other in any way. There can be stores with no Employees and there can be stores with no Customers. There are employees and customers listed multiple times in thier respective tables, and the multiple listings need to show on the report. A result set may look like this.
Store | Emp | Cust
1|1|
2|2|1
2|2|2
2| |3
2| |4
3| |5
3| |5
4|3|6
4|3|7
4|3|7
4|3|8
4|3|
4|3|
I tried a full join, but ended up with this:
Store ID ~~~~~Emp~~~~~Cust
OHCOL-811C ~~~~~10498500|OHCOL-811C|00151.00|448097821|SL0005 ~~~~~448097821| | | |N|AD-TSUACE |SPKG |146921092
OHCOL-811C ~~~~~10498500|OHCOL-811C|00152.00|448097821|SL0006 ~~~~~448097821| | | |N|AD-TSUACE |SPKG |146921092
OHCOL-811C ~~~~~10498500|OHCOL-811C|00153.00|448097821|SL0007 ~~~~~448097821| | | |N|AD-TSUACE |SPKG |146921092
OHCOL-811C ~~~~~10498500|OHCOL-811C|00154.00|448097821|SL9827 ~~~~~448097821| | | |N|AD-TSUACE |SPKG |146921092
OHCOL-811C ~~~~~10498500|OHCOL-811C|00155.00|448097821|SL0150 ~~~~~448097821| | | |N|AD-TSUACE |SPKG |146921092
OHCOL-811C ~~~~~10498500|OHCOL-811C|00151.00|448097821|SL0005 ~~~~~448097821| | | |N|AD-TSUACE |SPKG |146876651
OHCOL-811C ~~~~~10498500|OHCOL-811C|00152.00|448097821|SL0006 ~~~~~448097821| | | |N|AD-TSUACE |SPKG |146876651
OHCOL-811C ~~~~~10498500|OHCOL-811C|00153.00|448097821|SL0007 ~~~~~448097821| | | |N|AD-TSUACE |SPKG |146876651
OHCOL-811C ~~~~~10498500|OHCOL-811C|00154.00|448097821|SL9827 ~~~~~448097821| | | |N|AD-TSUACE |SPKG |146876651
OHCOL-811C ~~~~~10498500|OHCOL-811C|00155.00|448097821|SL0150 ~~~~~448097821| | | |N|AD-TSUACE |SPKG |146876651
As you can see Cust is being duplicated for each Emp. The actual result set should look like this.
Store ID ~~~~~Emp~~~~~Cust
OHCOL-811C ~~~~~10498500|OHCOL-811C|00151.00|448097821|SL0005 ~~~~~448097821| | | |N|AD-TSUACE |SPKG |146921092
OHCOL-811C ~~~~~10498500|OHCOL-811C|00152.00|448097821|SL0006 ~~~~~448097821| | | |N|AD-TSUACE |SPKG |146876651
OHCOL-811C ~~~~~10498500|OHCOL-811C|00153.00|448097821|SL0007 ~~~~~NULL
OHCOL-811C ~~~~~10498500|OHCOL-811C|00154.00|448097821|SL9827 ~~~~~NULL
OHCOL-811C ~~~~~10498500|OHCOL-811C|00155.00|448097821|SL0150 ~~~~~NULL
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2015
I have two xml source and i need only left restricted data.
how can i perform left restricted join?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2007
Scenario:
OLEDB source 1
SELECT ...
,[MANUAL DCD ID] <-- this column set to sort order = 1
...
FROM [dbo].[XLSDCI] ORDER BY [MANUAL DCD ID] ASC
OLEDB source 2
SELECT ...
,[Bo Tkt Num] <-- this column set to sort order = 1
...
FROM ....[dbo].[FFFenics] ORDER BY [Bo Tkt Num] ASC
These two tasks are followed immediately by a MERGE JOIN
All columns in source1 are ticked, all column in source2 are ticked, join key is shown above.
join type is left outer join (source 1 -> source 2)
result of source1 (..dcd column)
...
4-400-8000119
4-400-8000120
4-400-8000121
4-400-8000122 <--row not joining
4-400-8000123
4-400-8000124
...
result of source2 (..tkt num column)
...
4-400-1000118
4-400-1000119
4-400-1000120
4-400-1000121
4-400-1000122 <--row not joining
4-400-1000123
4-400-1000124
4-400-1000125
...
All other rows are joining as expected.
Why is it failing for this one row?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 3, 2015
How to return only non matching left join records. Currently I am doing a traffic management database to learn sql.
I am checking for all parishes with no associated drivers. Currently I only have 2 of such.
The regular left join
select parish.name, driver.fname from parish left join driver on driver.parish=parish.name
Returns the all the names of the parishes and the first name of the associated drive, followed by the matches, however the two parishes with no matches have null for the first name.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 5, 2006
I have a merge join (full outer join) task in a data flow. The left input comes from a flat file source and then a script transformation which does some custom grouping. The right input comes from an oledb source. The script transformation output is asynchronous (SynchronousInputID=0). The left input has many more rows (200,000+) than the right input (2,500). I run it from VS 2005 by right-click/execute on the data flow task. The merge join remains yellow and the task never finishes. I do see a row count above the flat file destination that reaches a certain number and seems to get stuck there. When I test with a smaller file on the left it works OK. Any suggestions?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2015
I have two queries as below;
SELECT EventID, Role, EventDuty, Qty, StartTime, EndTime, Hours
FROM dbo.tblEventStaffRequired;
and
SELECT EventID, Role, StartTime, EndTime, Hours, COUNT(ID) AS Booked
FROM tblStaffBookings
GROUP BY EventID, Role, StartTime, EndTime, Hours;
How can I join the results of the two by matching the columns EventID, Role, StartTime and EndTime in the two and have the following columns in output EventID, Role, EventDuty, Qty, StartTime, EndTime, Hours and Booked?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2007
In Sql Server
Code Snippet
CREATE TABLE t_contact
(
Id uniqueidentifier,
FirstName nvarchar(50),
LastName nvarchar(50),
TaskId uniqueidentifier
)
GO
CREATE TABLE t_task
(
Id uniqueidentifier,
Start datetime
)
GO
INSERT INTO t_task (Start, Id) VALUES ('3/25/2007 12:00:00 AM', '5949b899-3230-4d30-b210-9903015b2c6b')
INSERT INTO t_contact (FirstName, LastName, TaskId, Id) VALUES ('Adam', 'Tybor', '5949b899-3230-4d30-b210-9903015b2c6b', '304fc653-d366-404b-878d-9903015b2c6f');
INSERT INTO t_task (Start, Id) VALUES ('4/1/2007 12:00:00 AM', '4bd2df60-ca6c-493d-8824-9903015b2c6f')
INSERT INTO t_contact (FirstName, LastName, TaskId, Id) VALUES ('John', 'Doe', '4bd2df60-ca6c-493d-8824-9903015b2c6f', '7b91f7d6-d71e-47b4-a7ec-9903015b2c6f')
INSERT INTO t_task (Start, Id) VALUES ('3/29/2007 12:00:00 AM', '05167e74-cf63-452a-8f25-9903015b2c6f')
INSERT INTO t_contact (FirstName, LastName, TaskId, Id) VALUES ('Jane', 'Doe', '05167e74-cf63-452a-8f25-9903015b2c6f', '6871ee8d-bc83-478c-8a7c-9903015b2c6f')
GO
SELECT task1_.Start as y0_, count(this_.FirstName) as y1_ FROM t_contact this_ inner join t_task task1_ on this_.TaskId=task1_.Id GROUP BY task1_.Start
GO
Result (Expected)
2007-03-25 00:00:00.000 1
2007-03-29 00:00:00.000 1
2007-04-01 00:00:00.000 1
Result In Sql CE (UnExpected)
2007-03-25 00:00:00.000 3
2007-03-29 00:00:00.000 3
2007-04-01 00:00:00.000 3
Can SQL CE not count with a join? Seems like this a bug with aggregates or joins. I tried everything to try and get the correct result but no luck.
Thanks Adam
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 30, 2015
In Outer join, I would like to add the outer columns that don't exist in the right table for each order number. So currently the columns that don't exist in the right table only appear once for the entire set. How can I go about adding PCity, PState to each order group, so that PCity and PState would be added as null rows to each group of orders?
if OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#left_table') is not null
drop table #left_table;
if OBJECT_ID('tempdb..#right_table') is not null
drop table #right_table;
create table #left_table
[Code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2006
Is there a way to do a super-table join ie two table join with no matching criteria? I am pulling in a sheet from XL and joining to a table in SQLServer. The join should read something like €śfor every row in the sheet I need that row and a code from a table. 100 rows in the sheet merged with 10 codes from the table = 1000 result rows.
This is the simple sql (no join on the tables):
select 1.code, 2.rowdetail
from tblcodes 1, tblelements 2
But how to do this in SSIS?
Thanks - Ken
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 6, 2008
I read that merge joins work a lot faster than hash joins. How would you convert a hash join into a merge join? (Referring to output on Execution Plan diagrams.)
THANKS
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 22, 2007
I have the following query in an ExecuteSQL Task:
Insert Into Table2
Select * From Table1 Where Column1Val = '4'
As you can see, I don't need any parameters so I havent configured any. Also, there should not be any result set so I shouldnt need to configure a resultset parameter.
Why is the above query failing with
Problems with the query, "ResultSet" property not set correctly, parameters not set correctly, or connection not established correctly
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 26, 2004
I have got a query in which a merge join is 99% of the cost .... and I am confused ... is not merge join supposed to be the fastest ??? Anyone seen this before ???
Any ideas why this could be happening ... and sorry ... do not ask me to post the code coz I will not be able to ...
View 14 Replies
View Related
Mar 3, 2008
Hi, all experts here,
Any advices for when will be a better way of using Merge join instead of other options?
Thank you very much and I am looking forward to hearing from you shortly.
Best regards,
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2006
All,
I need to use Merge Join transformation to join two sources. One is from a PIVOT transformation and one of the output columns is ISSORTED, the other is from an OLE DB Source using a query. The Merge Join transformation requires both input source have to be sorted. I cannot find the ISSORTED property on the OLE DB Source!!
I tried to use Derived/ copy transformations but cannot find the property also. How can set the OLE query sorted in order to use the MergeJoin?
Thanks a lot
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2007
Hello all,
I have a package where I use merge join for two sorted inputs and the output is stored in a raw file.
In another package, the raw file from above package is again merge joined with another sorted input. Now my question is....do we need to sort again the raw file from first package? or is it OK to set the isSorted property to True and define the sort keys?
Thank you.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 17, 2007
I am new to this SSIS.
I have a simple join query like this
select a.id from tbl_a a, tbl_b b where a.id = b.id and I want insert the result to my temp table.
the query results is 1500 rows.
but when I use merge join in SSIS, it only inserts to my temp table 4 rows.
I use inner join and I already set the IsSorted to true and specify the sort position for the columns in both source tables
In tbl_a, there are one million rows, in tbl_b, there are 2000 rows.
I don't know why the merge join cannot work out my task.Is there other way that I can just run this simple join query in SSIS to copy the data?
Please help, thanks in advance.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2008
Hello,
I have a Merge Join transformation and when i sort values in OLEDB source the merge join fails, but if i use a sort transformation it works! Why??
Best regards,
Fred
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 29, 2006
Hi,
I have a SQL Statatment:
SELECT * FROM TABLE1 AS A
JOIN TABLE2 AS B
ON A.X= B.X
AND A.Y= B.Y
When i execute this code in sql server returns 549 lines. I created a package with two oledb sources one for each table, sorted the tables with fields X and Y after placed a Merge Join with the fields:
A.Y join B.Y order 1
A.X join B.X order 2
both fields with the Join Key checked
But my package return 411 lines.
What's happened?? :(
When a i have the code:
SELECT A.X, A.Y, B.X, B.Y
FROM TABLE1 AS A
JOIN TABLE2 AS B
ON A.X= B.X
When i did the join only one field SSIS worked fine, sql server returns 622 and SSIS returns 622 lines.
Please help-me...
Thanks,
André
View 8 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2006
Hi guys! I'm trying to figure out how to join 3 tables, but I can't seem to find a solution. What I want to do is to put table 1, table 2 and table 3 into table_merged.
table_merged = table 1 + table 2 + table 3
Is it possible to merge tables even if they have different fields?
Please help.
Onegai shimasu...
Thanks in advance!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2006
i'm merge joining 2 data sources, one is oracle and the other is excel...the problem is in the oracle source, it's a sql statement like:
select hdr.div_ord_no, hdr.mtr_no, hdr.prod_cd
from qctrl_div_ord_header hdr,
(select max(sub.eff_dt_from) min_eff_dt_from, div_ord_no
from qctrl_div_ord_header sub
group by div_ord_no
) tmp
where hdr.eff_dt_from = tmp.min_eff_dt_from
and hdr.div_ord_no = tmp.div_ord_no
having that sql statement, merging will come out with 0 rows
however, having a simple query like:
select hdr.div_ord_no, hdr.mtr_no, hdr.prod_cd
from qctrl_div_ord_header hdr
merging will come out with 2 rows
you may think that the data in the first sql statement is not there for the merge, which causing the 0 rows, however, the data is there, i'm only joining by one column and definitely the data is there, the merge result should be 2 rows for both query statements
i believe this is a problem with SSIS, anyway around this?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2008
I am working on an ssis package and i find an problem while using the merge join for merging 2 OLEDB Data sources .
data source 1 is : - The table formed my an sal server comand , that out put is given to a multicast since i want to sare that output amoung 2o other tables.
So the the left input for the merge join is OLEDB source , which contains direct data from source table
I am usong Inner join on one column
The problem is i am not getting the expected rows as out put of merge .
I tried to join the two tables in sqlserver query window and i am getting expected result
What could be the problem
The first table is
Reservations.ReservationManual
second table is Out put of the following query
Select Distinct B.ReservationID as R
from Property.Main A ,Reservations.Reservations B ,Reservations.ReservationRooms C
Where
A.propertyID = B.PropertyId And
C.ReservationID = B.ReservationID And
getdate() >=C.Until +A.ReservationOffLineDays
i am not getting the expected result here in SSIS package merge join
But if i try to execute the following in query editer in management studio i am getting the expected result !!
declare @temp as table
(ResID Varchar(50)
)
Insert into @temp
(ResID)
Select Distinct B.ReservationID as R
from Property.Main A ,Reservations.Reservations B ,Reservations.ReservationRooms C
Where
A.propertyID = B.PropertyId And
C.ReservationID = B.ReservationID And
getdate() >=C.Until +A.ReservationOffLineDays
select * from Reservations.ReservationManual A , @temp b
Where A.reservationID = b.resID
View 10 Replies
View Related
Oct 9, 2006
Hi,
I am trying to normalize data using the unpivot transform. I have to unpivot using more than one key so I have a multicast feeding into two unpivot transforms then into a sort transform. This is where my problem starts - I have tried using a Merge Join (inner Join) transform but dont get the expected result.
My original data looks like this:
Pk_ID
Choice1
Choice2
Feedback1
Feedback2
10
a
b
x
y
After the mulitcast - unpivot - Merge Join, the expected result is: (pk_newID is an identity)
Pk_newID
fk_ID
Choice
Feedback
563
10
a
x
564
10
b
y
However with a Merge-Join (inner join on pk_ID) I get
Pk_newID
fk_ID
Choice
Feedback
563
10
a
x
564
10
a
y
565
10
b
x
566
10
b
y
Is the Merge Join transform not the right choice?
Thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2008
I am trying to use the merge join example in the following link. To import new records only.
http://www.sqlis.com/311.aspx
The problem is that for some unkown reason the join is not woeking correctly. One of the records is incorrectly showing a NULL on the output. This would indicate that it would be a new record, but it is not it already exists in the new table.
I created a dummy table in SQL and executed the same join and I always get the right answer. What the heck could be wrong?
For example. Table A has 20 records Table B has 3 records. Table B has the new records I want to import into Table A. The package runs corectly the first time, only importing the 3 new records. Then the next time the package runs it shows 1 of the 3 records as being new still, and tries to import the record causing a PK error. Adding a watch to the MERGE output shows that the one record has a NULL on the join.
Please help this is driving me nuts.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Mar 30, 2007
Hi, I'm using a Merge Join Component of Inner Join type to retrieve from the right pipeline some records to append to the ones coming from left pipeline according to the join citerias defined on the compnent.
Is there any way to know which are the records coming from the left pipeline that doesn't match the join criterias?
In the following I'll try to do an axample.
LF pipeline:
Column0 Column1 Column2
1 aaaa aa11
2 bbbb bb11
3 cccc cc11
4 dddd dd11
RT pipeline:
ColumnA ColumnB
1 aa22
4 dd22
On exiting from the MergeJoin, defining €śColumn0€? for LT as join key and €śColumnA€? for RT and as output data all the columns of the LT pipeline and the only ColumnB from the RT pipeline it should be obtained the following records:
Column0 Column1 Column2 ColumnB
1 aaaa aa11 aa22
4 dddd dd11 dd22
and the records from the LT pipeline:
2 bbbb bb11
3 cccc cc11
shouldn't go in the output from the Merge Join Component.
What I need to know is which are these last lines because I need to manage them.
Thanks!
View 8 Replies
View Related
Oct 19, 2007
I'm trying to compare two fields between two tables using a Merge Join that runs into a conditional. This conditional sorts mismatched rows from validated ones but its returning incorrect mismatches (which means the mismatch is actually a match).
TABLE1 has two DT_STR fields with length 16 and TABLE2 had two DT_STR fields with length 32.
I've used a data conversion component to lengthen the first table's fields to a length of 32 but there still seems to be incorrect mismatches. For example TABLE1 had "AAA" and "BBB" and this appeared as a mismatch. If I used Query Analyzer to check TABLE2 for this criteria it would exist (which means it IS a match).
Is there any way to view hidden characters (i.e. carriage returns, tabs) in those fields? I've tried using RTRIM in my SQL Query for both my data sources and they still don't match up.
View 13 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2006
I've run into something that looks like a bug to me but I wanted to run it by the board:
Merge join 2 sorted tables.
Table1: ColumnA : Sort Order 1, ColumnB Sort Order 2
Table2 : ColumnA: Sort Order 1, ColumnB Sort Order 2, ColumnC not sorted
Merge Join the two tables on ColumnA and ColumnB...
Choose the following as output columns
A + B + C = works
C = works
A + C = works
B + C = NOT work.. error message: The column with the SortKeyPosition value of 0 is not valid. It should be 2.
Basically if you choose one or more of the sorted columns in the output at least one of them has to be the column with Sort position 1 or you'll get that error.
Is this a bug or intentional? If you do not have sort column 1 in the output that output could no longer be considered sorted... so perhaps the error is related to that (instead of error I'd expect some warning about the sorting). Interesting that it lets you choose C only becuase that also makes the output unsorted.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 15, 2006
Hello,
I've got a problem with the merge join operator.
I'm trying to Join two tables using a left outer join.
Here are my tables :
TABLE AGENT
AGENT_CODE; REGION_ID; COUNTRY_ID
AA;01;01;
BB;01;01;
CC;01;02;
CC;02;02;
DD;01;01;
600 records in this table.
TABLE DELEGUE
AGENT_CODE; FIRST_NAME; LAST_NAME
AA; Maradona;Diego;
BB; Maradona;Diego;
DD; Zidane;Zinedine;
145 records in this table.
This is what i expect in my left outer join:
AGENT_CODE; REGION_ID; COUNTRY_ID;FIRST_NAME; LAST_NAME
AA;01;01;Maradona;Diego;
BB;01;01;Maradona;Diego;
CC;01;02;NULL;NULL
CC;02;02;NULL;NULL;
DD;01;01;Zidane;Zinedine
600 records in the destination table, with only 145 Not null first_name and last_name
The
issorted property has been set to true in the 2 sources tables, the
numkeyscolumns property is set to 1, and the join keys are both checked.
When i execute the sql query using the editor in sql server, the result is good, i've got what i've expected.
But
when i run the dataflow, the destination has got 600 records, but the
columns FIRST_NAME and LAST_NAME are not null only 8 times, the 592
other lines are NULL.
Could someone explain to me why i lost 145-8=137 FIRST_NAME and 145-8=137 LAST NAME ?
Thank you in advance.
View 5 Replies
View Related
