Mirroring Causing Processor Load On Mirror Server
Jan 4, 2008
Hi everybody,
I have a mirroring set up for around 30 databases in a 64 bit - 2 powerfull servers scenario - wih latest sp2 + hotfix. Mirroring works perfectly most of the times but when the principal is getting busy during the busy period of the day all of a sudden the processor on the mirror jumps to 100% and stays there for a long time - there are no live databases on the mirror server - all the databases are in mirrored mode. The principal server processor is less than 5% all the time. The network load between the principal and the mirror is also in normal limits. The principal server is dedicated to SQL but the mirror has other things too but the other processes use up maximum 15-20% of the CPU and when I stop SQL Server in one of those moments when the CPU jumps to 100% everything comes back to normal so it's clear that the issue is SQL on the mirror.
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Stefan
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jun 14, 2015
I am using SQl Server 2012 Database Mirroring with around 40 gb as mdf and 1 gb as ldf. Now my ldf size increased . How to reduce ldf size while mirror enabled with mirror server and witness server. Can shrink the ldf with mirror enables.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2015
I need to migrate my SQL server Mirror Database to a new server. my current setup is as below
1. server A principal (192.168.1.100)
2. server B Mirror (192.168.1.200)
Now i have a new server (Server C) to replace server B as below
1. server A principal (192.168.1.100)
2. server C Mirror (192.168.1.300)
My question is how to migrate mirror db to new server without any affect or downtime on principal server.
note: SQL SERVER 2008R2 EE(64BIT), Win2008R2 EE 64bit.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 16, 2015
I have created a Endpoint with "Mirroring Server" on the mirroring instance. Due to the keyword server i am not able to drop the endpoint now.
Also am not able to configure a mirror in a windows workgroup also( the two systems principal and mirror are under same network ). I have followed many ways as per msdn articles and other blogs.
I am not able to connect to the mirror server.
I have tried giving the ip addr and the port no, also the computer name:port no, computername.local:port no etc. Both the systems are running on sql server 2008 only
I always get the error as Connection cannot be established to the destination.
(I have also enabled the ports in firewall by creating inbound and outbound rules)
The issue probably lies in NAMING server address i guess.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2007
Hi!
I have setup a database mirroring session without witness - ServerA is the principal, ServerB is the mirror,. Each SQL Server instance is hosted on its own machine on sql2005 EE SP2. The mirroring is working correctly. If I submit to server ServerA command:
ALTER DATABASE MYDBNAME SET PARTNER FAILOVER
, ServerB becomes the principal, it means that mirroring works correctly.
My issue is with the SQL Native Client and a front-end ASP application (actually IIS 6.0 site) that needs to make use of this database. I have setup my front-end application to use SQL Native Client and specified the failover server in connection string. Here is the connection string that I am using :
PROVIDER=SQLNCLI.1;Server=ServerA,1433;Failover Partner=ServerB,1433;Database=MYDBNAME;Network=dbmssocn;Integrated Security=SSPI;
Everything works perfectly on my front-end application when ServerA is the principal. If I execute on server ServerA command:
ALTER DATABASE MYDBNAME SET PARTNER FAILOVER
, ServerB becomes the principal, and the failover occurs correctly on the database side. The problem is that my front-end application is not able to query the database on ServerB. The error appears:
Microsoft SQL Native Client error '80004005'
Cannot open database "MYDBNAME" requested by the login. The login failed.
This behavior my appication till I unload IIS 6.0 pool application. After that my front-end application becomes work correctly with ServerB.
When I swap server, I execute on server ServerB command:
ALTER DATABASE MYDBNAME SET PARTNER FAILOVER,
my IIS 6.0 application automaticly turn back to ServerA without any action on my side.
I am using SQL Native Client last version http://download.microsoft.com/download/2/7/c/27c60d49-6dbe-423e-9a9e-1c873f269484/sqlncli.msi (issued in February 2007). Has anyone experienced this issue? I'm thinking that it's a problem in the SQL Native client
View 10 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2015
missing witness server information and the fail-over is broken suddenly? 4:00am no maintenance job. I have one sql job on 10pm for backup on database transaction log only.
I can see the primary have problem then perform fail-over to mirror database, the auto fail-over was broken.
I re-build the sql mirror is OK , but i want to find the root cause.
Windows application event was full when there have many failed event, i have increase log size for application event.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2007
I have two questions here.
Question 1:
If I am using Database Mirroring for my production database in SQL Serever 2005, can I do mirroring on the mirror database?
Principal Database -- Mirror -- Mirror A -- Mirror -- Mirror B
Can this be done?
Question 2:
Can I do 2 mirroring on a single principal database? If can, which mirror database it will goes when the failed over happen? can the other mirror switch to mirror the failed over database?
Principal Database -- Mirror -- Mirror A
-- Mirror -- Mirror B
Please advise. Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 13, 2015
I have three win2k8 r2 servers. 2 are running SQL 2008 r2 and are mirrored. The 3rd server is a witness server. Every so often we get errors and failovers of the mirror. The communication errors are between the witness server and sql servers. No errors between SQL servers. There seem to be no network issues and happen randomly.
Event id 1474 and 1479.
The mirroring connection to "TCP://witnesssrv:5022" has timed out for database "DB" after 30 seconds without a response. Check the service and network connections.
Database mirroring connection error 4 'An error occurred while receiving data: '64(The specified network name is no longer available.)'.' for 'TCP://witnesssrv:5022'.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 22, 2006
Hi, all.
here is the situation.
we designated one server as a mirrored server. this server will host all mirrored databases from different principles in different server using certificate.
1) Server A (Principle) Server B(Mirrored)
2) Server C (Principle) Server B(Mirrored)
I was able to set up mirroring between A and B. But unable to set up mirroring between C and B.
My question is "Can I grant connect on endpoint to two different host logins?"
For example, on the server B
I created two different logins for Server A and C in order to assign different certificates to two principle servers.
For Server A.
create login server_A_login with password = 'djkkajnxks';
go
create user server_A_user for login server_A_login
go
create certificate server_A_cert
authorization Server_A_user
from file = 'c:certificateserver_a_cert.cer'
go
GRANT CONNECT ON ENDPOINT::Endpoint_Mirroring TO [server_a_login];
GO
For Server C.
create login server_C_login with password = 'djkkajnxks';
go
create user server_C_user for login server_c_login
go
create certificate server_c_cert
authorization Server_c_user
from file = 'c:certificateserver_c_cert.cer'
go
GRANT CONNECT ON ENDPOINT::Endpoint_Mirroring TO [server_c_login];
GO
when I set up like this and try to start mirroring, I am getting error from server c saying, "the network tcp:serverb.corp.com can not be reached or does not exist"
But mirroring between server a and b is OK. I set up them first, then between c and b.
any ideas?
thanks,
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2006
Hi,
I've a very basic doubt about database mirroring. I did setup a database mirroring session with the help of SQL Server Management Studio between the server A (db1) and B(db1). When is stop database mirroring by using the command button "Stop Mirroring" available in the mirroring page of SQL Server Management Studio , the mirror database{ B(db1) } goes to state "Restoring...". After stopping the mirroring i'm not able to access the mirror database.
Can you please tell me how to bring mirror database B(db1) to operation mode so that we can start working with that database?
Regards,
Gopi
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2015
I have configured active passive cluster in production environment. And we also have a dr which we have configured with asynchronous mirroring with no witness. Currently active node(node
a) is in sync with dr. When failover happens and the second node(node
b) becomes active, the mirror is broken and goes to disconnected mode.
But when we failback again to node a mirror is connected again and is in sync again. In our setup we have active passive cluster and a standalone server as dr.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2015
When I try to setup mirror on a SQLserver dbase using windows Authenticated login I get error:-
Login failed for user 'SERVERBAdministrator'. (Microsoft SQL Server , Error: 4060).The login connect string however on selection of SERVERB from SERVERA has a greyed out option for using Windows Authenticated login which clearly shows Username: SERVERAAdministrator.It is odd that the error coming back is showing SERVERBAdministrator on the rejection. (somehow the machines got swapped over in the authentication) The strange thing is if you use the SQLserver studio on SERVERA to connect to SERVERB using the object browser and Windows authenticated login it all works fine without errors. clearly the Mirror software is using some other means/privs of login to establish the connection.
The two machines SERVERA and SERVERB are in the same Domain (DOM1) but they are not using a domain user account.They are using Administrator user on both independent machines. The SQLSERVER install specified both Windows and sqlserver logins. The mirror is to use Windows authenticated login.Is there some login priv we are missing The sqlserver security has allowed this type of login......
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 2, 2015
DB replication can set db recovery model to simple ,why db mirror can not db recovery model to simple.
DB mirror must be set to full recovery model.
As far as I know, whatever db mirror and db replication ,there is a log reader to read the log in the ldf file DB mirror and DB replication are almost the same principle to replicate the db to another db server.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 16, 2007
I have a package that is failing because of a truncation error. Now, by default (and I leave this for ALL my packages) if one row fails processing the entire package should fail and nothing gets loaded into db. But instead I am actually getting a partial db load.
I have confirmed the "Rows per btach" value (blank) and the "Maximum insert commit size" value (0) for the OLE DB Destination Editor so I have no idea what is going on. Are there any other properties I should be checking?
Thanks.
Jason
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 18, 2015
We have a SQL server 2012 database with size 200mb and Transaction Log has gone up to 34GB.
We have SQL server Mirror is enabled and principal database is running with Full Recovery Model.
How can I truncate/Shrink Log files? Will it impact on existing mirroring setup? I am very much new to SQL server.
View 17 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2006
Hi guys , I would like to know what's the exactly results able to get in this following scenario.
Server A : Principal
Server M : Mirror
Server W : Witness
1) Firstly, disable server M, following by server W. So probably i will unable to connect to Server A eventhough it acts as a principal.
2) Next, if I enable either server M or server W , what will I able to get actually ? Is it the mirroring works like the article which written in Microsoft page ?(http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/sql/2005/dbmirror.mspx#ETPAE)
At here, I get an error message and unable to continue the mirroring section. ( "Database EMS is enabled for Database Mirroring, but neither the partner nor witness server instances are available: the database cannot be opened." or "Database 'EMS' is being recovered. Waiting until recovery is finished." )
3) If I enable both server M and server W, the mirroring continue to work again.
Can I have any assistance on (2) issue? Thx for the assistance.
Best Regards,
Hans
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 7, 2006
To configure database mirroring
After connecting to the principal server instance, in Object Explorer, click the server name to expand the server tree.
Expand Databases, and select the database to be mirrored.
Right-click the database, select Tasks, and then click Mirror. This opens the Mirroring page of the Database Properties dialog box.
To begin configuring mirroring, click the Configure Security button to launch the Configure Database Mirroring Security Wizard.
but i do not see any "Mirror" Option in the "Tasks" menu.
Why ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 15, 2015
I want my database to be mirrored . is it possible to mirror it on the same machine.
I have tried to create a named instance but while trying to configure its not visible.?
Am using SQL SERVER 2008
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 27, 2015
I have a 2 node cluster having 4 cores each wherein having 3 instances of SQL 2008 R2 enterprise comprising of 60 databases, 20 on each instance. I need to setup mirroring for each of the databases to a secondary server having 4 cores and 3 instances.
What i understand is that in this case the mirror server will be providing max of 512 worker threads and the 60 mirror databases would consume 240 threads.
What all needs to be checked for looking into the feasibility of going ahead with a async mirror setup as mentioned above.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 27, 2008
When Create Mirror Database Server, Where need to store the Transaction Log backup file?I took FULL Backup of my Primary Database, and I restored at my Mirror Server also. When I try to create a Mirror Database."The remote copy of database "<db_name>" has not been rolled forward to a point in time that is encompassed in the local copy of the database log. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error:1412)".I am misplacing the Transaction Log backup file. Where I need to store that file?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Oct 16, 2007
Hello everybody,
I'am currently testing a MSSQL 2005 mirroring implementation with automatically failover.
1 principal server ====> Server A
1 mirror server ====> Server B
1 witness server ====> Server C
When server A fails Server B becomes Principal. ( which is the general idea ) This is working perfectly.
The problem is when i try to connect to the mirror Server B ( actually the new principal )
I use the .NET connection string with the failover parameter ( even without the parameter ) the connection fails.
( the general error : unable to connect, or connection property has not been initialized )
Data Source=ServerA; Failover Partner=ServerB;Initial Catalog=DBMTest;uid=dbuser;pwd=dbpassword;
This connection property works fine when server A (original principal) is online.
When i run the SQL profiler with the mirror db as profile, i dont see the traffic.
So you think the mirror server has a network problem or was not connfigured for remote access.
i thought that also, but when i create a 'stand alone - non mirrored' database the same application with the same connetion string ( well.....different db) works fine.
The problem must be in the whole mirroring implementation....... ( my idea )
Does anyone had the same problem, or better, doed anyone know how to solve it?
Hope to hear from you soon!
Thank you in advance!
Regards,
W.schmitt
The netherlands
View 6 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2007
Hi guys, can I know whether 2 servers (load balancing) able to set up the mirroring on another server? From what I know, mirroring only can set 1 IP address for principal. I just want to double confirm on it. Thanks for any assistance here.
Best Regards,
Hans
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 2006
Is it compatible to set up SQL DB mirroring on 2
different physical servers (High availbility + FULL transaction safety +
Automatic failover with a third server as witness) and simultaneously set up
network load balancing between these 2 servers (option with Windows Server 2003
Enterprise) ?
If yes, which type of licenses do I need and how
many (for SQL server 2005 and Windows Server 2003) with such a configuration
?
- 4 physical servers in total : A, B, C and
D
- load balancing between A and B (same application)
- load balancing between C and D (same application)
- A hosts principal DB X, B hosts mirror of DB
X
- C hosts principal DB Y, D hosts mirror of DB
Y
- D is witness for A and B
- B is witness for C and D
- A and B : only internal clients <
25
- C and D : both internal and external clients
(internal clients <25, number of external clients is unknown (>25)
)
Hoping this description will be helpful enough for
you...
(I am looking for a very high availability
system)
Thank you in advance for your support.
This licensing question is pretty much urgent (for
a bid) : a quick answer would be very appreciated...
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 14, 2007
Hello.
I am confuse and cant decide on how to setup high availability on our SQL 2005. Here's what on my mind and on resources list:
I plan to have mirroring on my SQL1 to SQL2 with the help of SQL3 as witness. So this would be automatic failover. My idea on mirroring is when SQL1 goes down, SQL3 would tell SQL2 to run and be the primary. It will automatically failover to SQL2. Right? My questions are:
1) How can I revert back to SQL1 once it is ready?
2) I read in one of the post that it is impossible to write in a mirrored DB, is this true? I mean, what's the use of failing over to the next node when it's not possible to write and update data/records?
3) If number 2 is false (i hope so), how would the data be synchronize from SQL2 back to SQL1. Those transaction that were made while SQL1 is down.
4) How about the connection string from the web applications? Would it be automatically point to SQL2? We have load balancing setup in place, would this help web application connection to automatically point to SQL2?
Another setup:
We have SAN in place (not yet used, but is planning to use for this SQL thing), EMC to be specific. My question would be:
1) For SAN setup, the data storage would be centralize. So would that mean that SQL1 and SQL2 services will use the same data and log file from the SAN storage?
2) How would you call this setup then? Can this be clustering type of high availability? Will clustering work under load balancing setup? I believe mirroring is not possible here? Right?
3) How can I setup my 3 SQL servers with the same theory in mind: when SQL1 goes down, SQL2 will take over. Data will be synchronize when SQL1 is up and running again. With automatic failover and reverting back to primary.
I read so much topics about this, but the more I research, the more I get confuse.
Any suggestions, comments, advice is greatly appreciated!
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2006
You will all have to excuse my ignorance. I'm a developer who also doubles up as a development DBA. I am however not particularly knowedgeable about all the really important DBA stuff.
We've built a small BI solution using SQL Server 2000. Our problem is that our server is getting on in years (5) and doesn't really have enough disk space or grunt. We havce a number of summary cubes that we've optimised quite successfully but our billing line level cubes run to 60 million rows and, well, they're about as quick as a dead ferret. Especially given the stupid queries our data analysts keep running.
We have however proved our point. That this can be done and indeed SQL Server can do it. So we're now looking at some infrastructure spend and some new copies of SQL2005.
But i need some advice. Our user base is climbing through the roof, we originally had 10, now we have closer to 50 and at this rate it'll be a couple of hundred by the end of the year. We're using a plugin called XLCubed to deliver that data into Excel from the Analysis Server.
The OLTP database that sits behind it is fairly robust but we have a number of web based apps (mostly lookup systems) that want to use the nice shiny new accurate tables of data we have created.
So I'm looking at a fairly big server to hold the OLTP DB, this will also serve up live data to our web apps. Its worth pointing out that the source data system is a batch system that processes overnight so we load data from yesterday at 6pm each evening and process our cubes and stuff overnight. Thus the data is a couple of days out of date. Don't laugh they used to use MS Access and got one mangy data set a month so this is a massive leap forward.
I wanted to mirror the DB to another machine but I also want to have a separate Cube Server. I wondered if the cube server could use the mirror to read its data from as opposed to loading the Main Server (the mirror would be an identical box) we would also have a separate box running some of our other systems acting as the witness.
I also wonderd about exporting the Cubes onto file shares for use locally as opposed to via the server which is how they connect now.
We have been using Reporting Services and some of the queries the devs write are not exactly efficient. So I was also planning on clustering a pair of smaller servers into a reporting farm. Could I use another SQL Server to serve data up to them? Could I use a DB snapshot to copy the data required to this server? What are the time / size implications of using a snapshot and replicating it over each night?
Any suggestions for places to read up on this? I've looked at the MS marketing blurb and while its big on buzzwords its light on specifics. Like how it actually works and how you would actually configure it to do some of this and what the implications would be.
Any advice?
many thanks
Steve
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2008
After adding the Witness Server to the Mirror session, the Witness Connection state between the Mirror and Witness Connection is Disconnected and the state between Principal and Witness Connection is Connected.
The procedures defined in Books Online was used to setup Database Mirroring...when the Witness server was added to the Mirror session, only the alter database T-SQL statement was executed on the Principal server.
ALTER DATABASE <db_name> SET WITNESS = 'TCP://<servername>:<port>'
After executing the above statement, a few seconds later the state between Principal and Witness Connection changed to Connected and the state between Mirror and Witness Connection remains Disconnected.
The Mirror session is not using Certificates, every server is on the same domain, using the same domain login account, and all servers have SP2 installed running Enterprise Edition.
Any idea's why the state between Mirror and Witness Connection remains Disconnected?
Thanks,
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2008
Server A = primary SQL DBs (mirroring origination)
Server B = failover SQL DBs (mirroring destination)
For database mirroring a witness is required.
Can the witness live in another instance of SQL on server B?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2006
I was trying to test mirroring and now would like to delete the mirror database but it says I need to remove database mirroring first. I deleted the endpoint and cannot figure out how to remove the mirroring. Can someone please help.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2005
Hi,
I would like know the information(hardware requirements and issues) regarding SQL server 2000/2005 implement in 64 bit processor.
Thanks,
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 1, 1999
I am having a powerfull Server (DELL - PowerEdge 6100/200) with 4 processors, 1 GB Ram, 6 Discs a 9 GB.
But the SQL-Server runs only on 1 processor. That means when I look at the Windows NT Task Manager it shows only 25 % used.
Can anybody give me a hint or and has anybody an idea how to modify the SQL-Server or the DELL-Server to use all 4 processors.
thank you Hubert
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 26, 2007
I am running a query on a SQL Server 2005 database and encounter the following error message
"Internal Query Processor Error: The query processor encountered an unexpected error during execution."
There is a join between a table on the 2005 database and another on a 2000 database. I have run DBCC CHECKTABLE and found no errors on the two tables.
Anybody with ideas?
Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 6, 1999
Good morning,
I've just updated my databases to V7.0 from 6.5. I am having some issues with CPU utilization after rebuilding the databases. I rebuilt the databases from scripts after modifying the scripts to deal with any SQL issues between the versions.
Symptoms:
When a bunch of stored procedures are executed the % Processor Time his 100% on a single processor system, the Processor Queue Length hits 13, the Batch Request/Sec starts at 20 and rises to 47 before dropping off, Context Switches go from 370/sec to about 833/sec before dropping off and there is an increase in page faulting.
My testing was done on a single processor but my real system is dual-300+ with 128Mb RAM. The database is only 40Mb and after running the index wizard there were no changes advised.
After reading a lot in help areas for MS and here I am not sure if this has to do with how SQL Server runs now (i.e. system configuration) or if it is a query issue with parallelism. I'm assuming query parallelism since the performance spikes occur when stored procedures are run. On a single processor is there a way to address this. Then, hopefully, I can deal with the real multiprocessor system.
Thanks much,
Don
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2004
If I install an instance of SQL Server on a box with 4 processors but specify in the licensing part of the installation procedure that it's a '2 processor license', does that really mean that SQL Server will only use 2 of the 4 processors? I ask because, having done this, if I check the SQL Server instance's properties, on the Processors tab, there are 4 processors ticked - giving the impression that 4 processors are being used by this SQL Server instance. Can anyone throw some light on this?
Another question... If I wish to reconfigure the same SQL Server instance from a 2 to a 4 processor 'per processor' license, how can this be done?
Clive
View 1 Replies
View Related
