Multiple Selects On Same Column, Same Table, One Query
Jul 20, 2005
I want to get a column count several times in one query using different
filters but can't work out how to do it - can anyone point me in the right
direction?
For example, how would combine these two selects into one query that will
list the total and filtered actions:
SELECT COUNT(actions) as actioncount, location
FROM mytable
GROUP BY location
SELECT COUNT(actions) as actioncount, location
FROM mytable
WHERE mycondition IS NULL
GROUP BY location
Hello, i would like to take the following select statements and make one table out of them. However, i want each statement to be its own column. The Union adds all of the statements into one colummn. Ultimately, i would like to place these into a stored procedure. Any help would be apreciated. Here are the statements:
select count(chalf_upd) as CHalfFile from elpc where elpc.chalf_upd is not null
select count (halfupd) as HalfFile from elpc where elpc.halfupd is not null
select count (cstaff_upd) as CStaffFile from elpc where elpc.cstaff_upd is not null
select count (staffupd) as StaffFile from elpc where elpc.staffupd is not null
select count (coffice_up) as COfficeFile from elpc where elpc.coffice_up is not null
select count (officeupd) as OfficeFile from elpc where elpc.officeupd is not null
select count (signupd) as SignFile from elpc where elpc.signupd is not null
select count (informupd) as ISignFile from elpc where elpc.informupd is not null
select count(staff_color_lastupd) as InStaffFile from staff_graphics_lastupdate where staff_graphics_lastupdate.staff_color_lastupd is not null
Strange Game. The only winnng move is not to play.
I need help in figuring out the proper way of writing a stored procedure out correctly to get my desired datasource. In my ocnIdToRatePlanOptions table, I will recieve a parameter via request.querystring @ocnId to filter out my result set for ocnIdToRatePlan table. Based on the ocnId filtered I want it to select the corresponding tables too.So, if a querystring is passed that is 3955 in my ocnIdToRatePlanOptions table, I want it to use it to create a select for RatePlan1. If a querystring is passed that is 1854 in my ocnIdToRatePlanOptions table, I want it to use to create a select for RatePlan2. Is this possible? ocnIdToRatePlanOptions Table [otrpoRefId] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,[FKocnId] [nvarchar](4) NOT NULL,[FKrpoRefId] [int] NOT NULL,1, 3955, 12, 1854, 2RatePlan1 Table[rp1RefId] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,[FKocnId] [nvarchar](4) NOT NULL[fee] [decimal](18, 2) NOT NULL1, 3955, 1.002, 2350, 2.00RatePla2 Table[rp2RefId] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,[FKocnId] [nvarchar](4) NOT NULL,[q_0_50] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_0_50] DEFAULT ((225)),[q_51_100] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_51_100] DEFAULT ((325)),[q_101_150] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_101_150] DEFAULT ((345)),[q_151_200] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_151_200] DEFAULT ((400)),[q_201_250] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_201_250] DEFAULT ((450)),[q_251_300] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_251_300] DEFAULT ((500)),[q_301_400] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_300_400] DEFAULT ((650)),[q_401_600] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_401_600] DEFAULT ((950)),[q_601] [numeric](18, 2) NOT NULL CONSTRAINT [DF_ratePlan2_q_601] DEFAULT ((1.50)) 1,1854, 225.00, 325.00, 345.00, 400.00, 450.00, 500.00, 650.00, 950.00, 1.502,8140, 225.00, 325.00, 345.00, 400.00, 450.00, 500.00, 650.00, 950.00, 1.50
I want to merge these queries in one query. When I use UNION ALL parameter sth_tarih sort is wrong.
SELECT TOP 5 sth_stok_kod,sth_evrakno_seri,sth_evrakno_sira,cha_kod ,sth_RECno,sth_tarih FROM STOK_HAREKETLERI AS SH INNER JOIN CARI_HESAP_HAREKETLERI AS CHH ON SH.sth_evrakno_sira= CHH.cha_evrakno_sira WHERE sth_stok_kod = ( SELECT sth_stok_kod FROM STOK_HAREKETLERI WHERE sth_RECno = (SELECT MAX (sth_RECno) FROM STOK_HAREKETLERI) ) AND sth_evraktip = 3 ORDER BY sth_stok_kod ASC,sth_tarih DESC
My stored procedure is giving me an error, it says "Unable to parse query text", and I'm certain the problem is with the SELECT statements. What am I doing wrong?
I am trying to write a query that selects all the mis_key that is not in the subquery. The left join query is working but when nested it comes out blank. Here is the query:
select * from [TLC NEW Inv. Anal.].dbo.['Home Decor$'] WHERE NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM [TLC New].DBO.['Fabric or basket accessory$'] LEFT JOIN [TLC NEW Inv. Anal.].DBO.['Home Decor$'] ON [TLC New].DBO.['Fabric or basket accessory$'].[Item #]=[TLC NEW Inv. Anal.].DBO.['Home Decor$'].mis_key)
Hello I'm trying to figure out how to write this query...for example,
A stud attended University of Toronto in 2001 and then attended Seneca College in 2006 ..... I want to select the Education Institute that the stud attended last.
I remember when studying for exam 70-528 that I read a practice question that said it was better to return 2 select satements rather than a join on two tables as this would be more efficent. The question from MCPD Self Paced Training Kit: Designing and Developing Web Based Applications Using Microsoft .NET Framework (Certification Series): Designing and Developing ... Applications Using Microsoft .NET Framework was: You are an ASP.NET application developer. You are participating in the design of a Web retail application. The application accepts orders from the clients and stores them in a SQL Server 2005 database. Each order contains header information (order date, client information, and shipping address) and details information, which includes information about ordered products. Each detail line contains information about one ordered product and its quantity and price. All of the preceding information will be stored in two database tables: one table called Orders for the order header and another table, called OrderDetails, for order details in which each record in the orders table could have one or more related records in the OrderDetails table. When the user selects the specific order ID, the application is supposed to select all the information about the order from the database, and you need to create a stored procedure that allows selection of information about all the fields for the stored order from the database, based on a provided order ID value. Which of the following stored procedures do you recommend creating in a database to achieve the best performance on a database server side and reduce network traffic between application and database server?The answer was:CREATE PROCEDURE ORDERS_SELECT_ORDER @ORDER_ID INT AS SELECT * FROM Orders WHERE OrderID=@ORDER_IDSELECT * FROM OrderDetails WHERE OrderID=@ORDER_ID RETURNAs oppose to the traditional: CREATE PROCEDURE SP_SELECT_ORDER @ORDER_ID INT AS SELECT * FROM Orders LEFT JOIN OrderDetails ON Orders.OrderID = OrderDetails.OrderlD WHERE Orders.OrderID=@ORDER_IDThe explanation was: To achieve the best performance, avoid names of the stored procedures that start with sp_ prefix. If the name of the stored procedure starts with sp_ SQL Server always looks for the stored procedure in the master database first because all the system stored procedures start with the same prefix and are stored in a master database. It requires extra effort from the server to locate the stored procedure. This occurs even if you qualify the stored procedure with the database name. To avoid this issue, use a custom naming convention rather than the sp_ prefix. In addition, using a join inside of the stored procedure for the provided scenario will require an extra task from the server to join the data and produce a joined result. It will also lead to the redundant data for the header information that will be duplicated with each detail of the order and will increase traffic between the client and the server. Using only two separate SELECT SQL statements will allow you to avoid a join operation and reduce the size of the returned data to the client.Any one got any views on this as I have never actually seen this demostrated in a sample applcation. Is it a lot more efficent?ThanksScott
Hi, I am having two tables Products and Transaction
In products I have ProductID and Description. (10 Records) In Transaction I have ProductID, Lot, Quantity and ListID . ( 4 Million Records)
When I use the inner join between these tables as below query its taking lot of time to give output.
select ProductID, Desc, Lot, qty from Products inner join Transactions on Products.ProductID = Transactions.ProductID where ListID = '9090909'
otherwise, if I use the below query its takes very few milli seconds to give output but I am not able to get the description from the product table. select * from Transactions TR where TR.ListID= '9090909' and TR.ProductID in
(select NDC from Products where Products.ProductID = TR.ProductID)
Any from can help me to get the description too at very few times.
I have a fact table with one column storing string values. I need to use this column as a measure, but as different measure. Here's a snapshot of the fact ( with 4 columns)
#1 #2 #3 #4(value) 1 1 2007-12-20 Male 2 1 2007-12-20 French 1 2 2007-12-20 Female 2 2 2007-12-20 English
I have a dimension which is like id name 1 Gender 2 Language
Is there a way to get measures from column 4 in fact table - so that I can give reports like how gender graph during a time period or language usage during a time period. The design will have more than 2 dimension members, so fact column can hold more data like location, etc...
Can you please suggest a way to handle such kind of fact table?
When I try to create a measure based on that column (and 'no aggregation') - I get error like - "Error 1 Errors in the metadata manager. The data type of the 'value' measure is not valid because the data type of the measure is a string type."
in my table i ve the column of item code which contains '1000' ,'2000' ,'3000' series i jus wanna display the output of item codes '1000','2000'series and some of ('3000019','3000020','3000077','3000078').
i tried in my join query
these code left(itemcode,4) in ('1000','2000') or itemcode in ('3000019','3000020','3000077','3000078')
Hello all. I hope someone can offer me some help. I'm trying to construct a SQL statement that will be run on a Dataset that I have. The trick is that there are many conditions that can apply. I'll describe my situation:
I have about 1700 records in a datatable titled "AISC_Shapes_Table" with 49 columns. What I would like to do is allow the user of my VB application to 'create' a custom query (i.e. advanced search). For now, I'll just discuss two columns; The Section Label titled "AISC_MANUAL_LABEL" and the Weight column "W". The data appears in the following manner:
(AISC_Shapes_Table)
AISC_MANUAL_LABEL W W44x300 300 W42x200 200 (and so on) WT22x150 150 WT21x100 100
(and so on) MT12.5x12.4 12.4 MT12x10 10 (etc.)
I have a listbox which users can select MULTIPLE "Manual Labels" or shapes. They then select a property (W for weight, in this case) and a limitation (greater than a value, less than a value, or between two values). From all this, I create a custom Query string or filter to apply to my BindingSource.Filter method. However I have to use the % wildcard to deal with exceptions. If the user only wants W shapes, I use "...LIKE 'W%'" and "...NOT LIKE 'WT%" to be sure to select ONLY W shapes and no WT's. The problems arises, however, when the user wants multiple shapes in general. If I want to select all the "AISC_MANUAL_LABEL" values with W <= 40, I can't do it. An example of a statement I tried to use to select WT% Labels and MT% labels with weight (W)<=100 is:
Code SnippetSELECT AISC_MANUAL_LABEL, W FROM AISC_Shape_Table WHERE (W <= 100) AND ((AISC_MANUAL_LABEL LIKE 'MT%') AND (AISC_MANUAL_LABEL LIKE 'WT%'))
It returns a NULL value to me, which i know is NOT because no such values exist. So, I further investigated and tried to use a subquery seeing if IN, ANY, or ALL would work, but to no avail. Can anyone offer up any suggestions? I know that if I can get an example of ONE of them to work, then I'll easily be able to apply it to all of my cases. Otherwise, am I just going about this the hard way or is it even possible? Please, ANY suggestions will help. Thank you in advance.
I want to produce some output for Mainframe application. For that I want to insert values from multiple table as source to a single column (huge in size)of a different table (Destination table). There may be same related records in all of the source tables with the primary key. When I export values from the source tables , each related records should be insterted to the destination table's field (multiple entries for each table). Please advise.
I have a table with a string value, where all values are seperated by a space/blank. I now want to use SQL to split all the values and insert them into a different table, which then later will result in deleting the old table, as soon as I got all values out from it.
Old Table:
Code: ID, StringValue
New Table:
Code: ID, Value1, Value2 Do note: Value1 is INT, Value2 is of nvarchar, hence Value2 can contain spaces... I just need to split on the FIRST space, then convert index[0] to int, and store index[1] as it is.
I can split on all spaces and just Select them all and add them like so: SELECT t.val1 + ' ' + t.val2... If I cant find the first space that is... I mean, first 2-10 characters in the string can be integer, but does not have to be.Shall probably do it in code instead of SQL?Now I want to run a query that selects the StringValue from OldTable, splits the string by ' ' (a blank) and then inserts them into New Table.
Code: SELECT CASE CHARINDEX(' ', OldTable.stringvalue, 1) WHEN 0 THEN OldTable.stringvalue ELSE SUBSTRING(OldTable.stringvalue, 1, CHARINDEX(' ', OldTable.stringvalue, 1) - 1) END AS FirstWord FROM OldTable
Found an example using strange things like CHARINDEX..But issue still remains, because the first word is of integer, or it does not have to be...If it isn't, there is not "first value", and the whole string shall be passed into "value2".How to detect if the very first character is of integer type?
Code: @declare firstDigit int IF ISNUMERIC(SUBSTRING(@postal,2,1) AS int) = 1 set @firstDigit = CAST(SUBSTRING(@postal,2,1) AS int) ELSE set @firstDigit = -1
select CurrencyCode,TransactionCode,TransactionAmount,COUNT(TransactionCode) as [No. Of Trans] from TransactionDetails where CAST(CurrentTime as date)=CAST(GETDATE()as date) group by TransactionCode, CurrencyCode,TransactionAmount order by CurrencyCode
select CurrencyCode,TransactionCode,TransactionAmount,COUNT(TransactionCode) as [No. Of Trans] from TransactionDetails where CAST(CurrentTime as date)=CAST(GETDATE()as date) group by TransactionCode order by CurrencyCode
But of course this codes gives an error, but how can I get my desired result??
I need to name make the name of a column the same as the name of a table from the result of a sql query.. here is the assignment question below..I can't figure out how to get the name of the table to be inputed as the column name..
Write a script that uses dynamic SQL to return a single column that represents the number of rows in the first table in the current database. The script should automatically choose the table that appears first alphabetically, and it should exclude tables named dtproperties and sysdiagrams. [highlight=#ffff11]Name the column CountOfTable, where Table is the chosen table name.[/highlight] Hint: Use the sys.tables catalog view.
I can figure out the rest. and actually have alredy done it, but i cannot figure out how to do the part that is highlighted above. I looked at lots of things on google to figure it out but no luck..Can some just give me some directlon or an example..
I'm fairly new to SQL and am just setting up a Windows 8 app using an Azure SQL server. The issue I have is looking up a part number supersession and getting the latest number. One part number can have multiple supersessions (ie RTC5756 > STC8572 > STC3765 > STC9150 > STC9191 > SFP500160 ).The data I am supplied monthly has both the superseeded items and the supersession information in both columns and is not easy to decipher - for example:
The newest part number is kept in a separate table - called "source" - which in this instance is SFP500160. I need access to the latest part number but also to the part's previous numbers, due to the fact that some people may still be stocking them as an old part number and for them to search by. Is there an easy and efficient way of doing both a lookup for the supersessions and a join on the two tables to minimize the queries on the database?
I have a table #vert where I have value column. This data needs to be updated into two channel columns in #hori table based on channel number in #vert table.
CREATE TABLE #Vert (FILTER VARCHAR(3), CHANNEL TINYINT, VALUE TINYINT) INSERT #Vert Values('ABC', 1, 22),('ABC', 2, 32),('BBC', 1, 12),('BBC', 2, 23),('CAB', 1, 33),('CAB', 2, 44) -- COMBINATION OF FILTER AND CHANNEL IS UNIQUE CREATE TABLE #Hori (FILTER VARCHAR(3), CHANNEL1 TINYINT, CHANNEL2 TINYINT) INSERT #Hori Values ('ABC', NULL, NULL),('BBC', NULL, NULL),('CAB', NULL, NULL) -- FILTER IS UNIQUE IN #HORI TABLE
One way to achieve this is to write two update statements. After update, the output you see is my desired output
UPDATE H SET CHANNEL1= VALUE FROM #Hori H JOIN #Vert V ON V.FILTER=H.FILTER WHERE V.CHANNEL=1 -- updates only channel1 UPDATE H SET CHANNEL2= VALUE FROM #Hori H JOIN #Vert V ON V.FILTER=H.FILTER WHERE V.CHANNEL=2 -- updates only channel2 SELECT * FROM #Hori -- this is desired output
my channels number grows in #vert table like 1,2,3,4...and so Channel3, Channel4....so on in #hori table. So I cannot keep writing too many update statements. One other way is to pivot #vert table and do single update into #hori table.
I would like to display the person_ID, the total row for formation actif = 1 by person and formation actif = 0 by person and experience actif = 1 by person and experience actif = 0 by person
the result must be: person_ID nbFormationActif NbFormationInactif NbExpActfi 1 2 5 4 2 1 2 5 ... NbExpInactif 0 3
I have doing a simple query who display total experience actif and inactif for all people but now i'm must to do the SAME THING in the SAME QUERY FOR FORMATION and i'm still block!!! someone can help me ?
SELECT PERSONNE.Person_ID ,COUNT(PERSONNE.Person_ID) AS totExpAct, totExpInactif FROM ( SELECT PERSONNE.Person_ID ,COUNT(PERSONNE.Person_ID) AS totExpInactif FROM PERSONNE INNER JOIN EXPERIENCE ON PERSONNE.Person_ID = EXPERIENCE.Personne AND EXPERIENCE.Actif = 0 GROUP BY PERSONNE.Person_ID ) PERSONNE INNER JOIN EXPERIENCE ON PERSONNE.Person_ID = EXPERIENCE.Personne AND EXPERIENCE.Actif = 1 GROUP BY PERSONNE.Person_ID, totExpInactif
What is the best way to use a left join in a SQL statement with multiple tables (more than 2)? I have a query that uses 7 tables, where most of the joins are inner joins, except for one, which needs to be a left join. The current SQL statement looks something like this:
FROM [table1],[table2],[table3],[table4],[table5],[table6],[table7] WHERE [table4].[field2]=[table1.field2]{this is an inner join} [table4].[field2]=[table2.field2]{this is an inner join} [table4].[field2]=[table3.field2]{this is an inner join} [table4].[field2]=[table5.field2]{this is an inner join} [table5].[field3]=[table6.field2]{this is an inner join} [table5].[field4]=[table7.field2]{this is needs to be a left join}
As it stands now, the last line in the WHERE clause is an INNER JOIN and limits the number of rows in my result. I need to select rows from [table7].[field2] whether or not a matching record exists in [table5].[field4]. The other INNER JOINS in the SQL statement must have matching records. Please advise.
Hey,I am having some confusion about how to formulate this particularquery.I have 2 tables. Table A has 4 columns say a1,a2,a3,a4 with thecolumns a1,a2,a4 forming the primary key. Table B again has 3 columnswith b1,b2,b3,b4 and like before, b1,b2 and b4 form the primary key.All columns are of the same datatype in both tables. Now I want to getrows from table A which are not present in table B. Whats the best wayof doing this?Thanks--Posted using the http://www.dbforumz.com interface, at author's requestArticles individually checked for conformance to usenet standardsTopic URL: http://www.dbforumz.com/General-Dis...pict235166.htmlVisit Topic URL to contact author (reg. req'd). Report abuse: http://www.dbforumz.com/eform.php?p=815725
Hello All & Thanks in advance for your help!Background:1) tblT_Documents is the primary parent transaction table that has 10fields and about 250,000 rows2) There are 9 child tables with each having 3 fields each, their ownPK; the FK back to the parent table; and the unique data for thattable. There is a one to many relation between the parent and each ofthe 9 child rows. Each child table has between 100,000 and 300,000rows.3) There are indexes on every field of the child tables (though Idon't believe that they are helping in this situation)4) The client needs to be presented a view that has 5 of the mainfields from the parent table, along with any and all correspondingdata from the child tables.5) The client will select this view by doing some pattern-matchingsearch on one of the child records' detail (e.g. field-name LIKE%search-item% - so much for the indexes...)Problem:When I do the simple join of just the parent with one of the children,the search works *fairly* well and returns the five parent fields andthe corresponding matching child field.However, as soon as I add any one of the other child records to simplydisplay it's unique data along with the previously obtained results,the resulting query hangs.Is the overall structure of the tables not conducive to this kind ofquery? Is this a situation where de-normalization will be required toobtain the desired results? Or, more hopefully, am I just an idiotand there is some simpler solution to this problem?!Thanks again for your assistance!- Ed
