Multiple Versions

May 12, 2000

Has anyone ever attempted to run 6.5 & 7.0 from the same server?

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Do I Need Multiple Versions Of Northwind?

Dec 13, 2006

I am learning SQL Server 2005 Express, and want to use the Northwind data base as used in many code examples. I wanted to attach the Northwind data base via SQL Management Studio, but cannot find a Northwind.mdf file.

When I do a search using 'Northwind', I see there are already a couple of different versions of Northwind already loaded. One appears to be associated with SQL Server Mobile Edition (Samples folder) and another seems to be associated with Visual Studio 8SDKv2.0Quickstart.

Can I use one of these existing Northwind databases (none have .mdf extention) for SQL Server 2005 or do I need to download yet another version?

View 3 Replies View Related

Multiple Sql Versions On The Same Machine?

Feb 25, 2008

I have sql server 2000 developer, sql server 2005 (workgroup, standard and enterprise), express and compact 3.5
and i need to test 2000, 2005 express and a full version of 2005 and compact all on the same machine.

Has anyone done something like this and are there any issues with this?
i have seen some threads about 2000 and 2005 being fine as long as one is a default instance and one is a named instance. Would i be able to do the same with say express being the default instance and then 2000 and 2005 both having named instances? And is there a particular order i should install? I already have 2005 express as the default instance and compact installed already.

Thank you
Jeff

View 5 Replies View Related

Multiple DB Versions / Intermittent Connection

Apr 11, 2012

I'm working on a DB that will be used in separate physical locations. These DBs will be identical in structure and completely independent of each other. Whilst some tables will retain similar or identical information, there is a large amount of content that will diverge.However, there is a central location that will need to manage these DBs. There will be a requirement from this central location to run reports, often comparing data between them, and to push data into each child location. There is no requirement for the child locations to 'share' information and indeed the volume concerned and the intermittent/low-bandwidth nature of their connections would make this undesirable. If an individual selection of data does need to be shared between I'm happy for it to be uploaded centrally, a decision made, and manually pushed to each child-location.

Which brings me to my real question. Should I try and include composite Primary Keys in many of the tables (to include probably an incrementing number and another field of site ID) so that when I absorb them all back centrally I can put them into one large DB. Or should I keep them as separate DBs in the central location and use some fairly 'normal' mechanisms for mirroring to sites; accepting that this will make running comparisons between them more difficult and potentially more difficult to write interactivity for centrally?

The best 'real world' comparison I can think of is transactions in retail shops. How do these transaction logs get stored centrally when they're all generating individual transaction numbers that are only unique in that location?

View 1 Replies View Related

Using Multiple Versions Of SQL Server In A Replication Topology

Nov 24, 2006

Hi there,

I have one publicacion on ms sql 2005 Enterprise w.sp1/MS Windows 2003 Enterprise w.sp2 and one subscriber on MS sql 2005 Enterprise w.sp1/MS Windows 2003 w.sp2, but I have also 3 subscriber on MS SQL 2000 w.sp3/MS Windows 2000 advanced server w.sp4. They replicate the same database with a publication compatible with 80RTM, All works fine with data replication, but I can't replicate DDL to MS sql 2005 suscriber, I don't care that don't replicate DDL, but I want manually alter triggers at MS sql 2005 suscriber, but I get this error at the subscriber on when I run the ALTER TRIGGER statement :

Msg 21531, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_MSmerge_altertrigger, Line 67

The DDL statement cannot be performed at the Subscriber or Republisher.

Msg 21530, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_MSmerge_ddldispatcher, Line 181

The DDL operation failed inside merge DDL replication manipulation.

Msg 3609, Level 16, State 2, Procedure TU_Centros_Distribucion_Articulos, Line 58

The transaction ended in the trigger. The batch has been aborted.



Any help will be appreciated,



PD. I miss sql2000 replication, where I have full control over the database logic

View 14 Replies View Related

OLEDB Interface To Multiple SQL Server Versions?

Mar 4, 2008

Howdy Folks!

I just finished an OLEDB interface written in VS2005 C++ that works with Sql Server Compact Edition 3.1. My team now wants me to make my interface compatible with Sql Server 2000, 2005, and 2005 Express. My question is...what header/lib files do I need installed and in my stdafx.h to pull this off? Is there a particular order I need to include these files in?

Right now I'm just including the following for SSCE:


#include <ssceerr30.h>

#include <ssceoledb30.h>


Once I get the right includes figured out, the next step is figuring out what CLSID's I should use in the CoCreateInstance call. I *think* I'm supposed to use CLSID_SQLOLEDB for 2000, CLSID_SQLNCLI for 2005, and I haven't a clue for 2005 Express. I could use some clarification on this as well.

Thanks a ton in advance...I've always been impressed by the MSDN boards...

View 6 Replies View Related

Multiple SQL Server Native Client Versions

Nov 24, 2006

One of the big problems with the old MDAC was different versions on different client machines. You would test your app with the latest version say, but when you deployed it, it might fail as the client has a different version.

My company develops software for Municipal Government clients. These clients use other SQL Server applications as well as ours, but they can only use one version of the client software (MDAC) on a given desktop. That means if we require a particular MDAC version, but the clients other applications from other vendors don't officially support that MDAC version, the client is in a real jam.

Our software also supports Oracle, which allows our software to specify a particular Oracle Home which points to a directory with a particular version of the Oracle client dlls (along with corresponding registry entries for that Oracle Home), such that we control the exact client version of the Oracle software that the client uses with our applications. This will not interfere with, and is completely seperate, from the default Oracle home installed when you install the Oracle client software.

What I would like to see for the Native Client is the ability to have our applications use the version of the Native Client that we wish to support and deploy without interfering with the Native Client version used by other applications. Have a default Native Client, but allow applications to somehow specify a different Native Client version/set of DLLs.

Is there any such functionality with the Native Client? (I didn't see any mention of such in the documentation, but I thought I'd ask)

If not, are there any future plans to support multiple Native Client versions on the same desktop?

View 1 Replies View Related

Multiple Versions Of SQL Server 2005 - What Order To Install?

Jun 15, 2007

I currently have three SQL Server instances installed on my notebook. One is v8, which I believe is used by an accounting application. The other two are as follows:-

SQL Server MSSMLBIZ

SQL Server SQLEXPRESS



The second one (SQLEXPRESS) fails to start generating the following error:-

The SQL Server (SQLEXPRESS) service terminated with service-specific error 17058 (0x42A2).



Other services listed in SQL Server Configuration Manager are:-

SQL Server Integration Services - which runs apparently normally.

SQL Server Analysis Services (MSSQLSERVER)

SQL Server Reporting Services (MSSQLSERVER)

SQL Server Browser



The last thre of these are run under LocalSystem.



I have been trying to install the SQLServer SP2 to the SQLEXPRESS instance for some number of days now, but each time it runs, it fails to install.



I am beginning to wonder if there is a sequence of installation for each of the above instances that should be followed. Can anyone give me any suggestions, or answers to the above problems?



Thanks,

View 3 Replies View Related

Help With Versions

Apr 24, 2001

We are in need of a solution to our problem. We are working for a customer and cannot use their database to work on during development. We have copied the layout and made a sample db for our development.
Rather than writing down all the changes we make to our own db and then making the same changes to the customer's, is there a better way? Can we use something like sourcesafe?
Thankyou

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL Versions

Oct 20, 2004

I've got a few SQL Servers at work which are development servers using SQL Server Standard Edition. I would like to downgrade them to SQL Server Developer Edition to save the Standard Edition licenses for production purposes. However, i do not wish to uninstall and reinstall SQL Server Developer Edition, restore all the dbs. Is there a way to change the version of the SQL Server ?

View 2 Replies View Related

Two Versions On The Same Box

Oct 9, 2007



Hi All,
Can we have 2 versions of SQL Server on the same server? Example, can I install SQL Server 2000 and 2005 on the same server? Please let me know about all the combinations possible/not possible.

Thanks a lot.

Mannu.

View 3 Replies View Related

Updating Need Two Different Versions

Dec 21, 2005

Is there a way to do the following -- I need to be able to update a table based on a selection by a DDL.  So here are my two update queries:
1. Update RequestData Set Approved = True Where DeptID = @DeptID2. Update RequestData Set Approved = True (Yes I need to be able to do all of the rows at once.)
But it's all based on the selection of the DDL---I really don't want to have to create two seperate sql commands any ideas?

View 4 Replies View Related

DTS Package Versions

Mar 22, 2001

Is there a way to remove old versions of a DTS package without rewriting the entire package?
These packages run fine but take up more space than I am willing to allocate.

View 1 Replies View Related

Versions Of SQL For SAN Support

Oct 22, 2001

I understand the SANs are only Supported by SQL Server 2000 Enterprise and no other versions of SQL, can anyone supply information to the contrary please?

View 2 Replies View Related

Installing 2 Versions

Mar 4, 1999

This may seem like a wierd question, but can I have 6.5 and 7.0 running on the same machine? I need 6.5 for production builds and 7.0 for test. Is this possible? THanks

Frank

View 1 Replies View Related

Trial Versions Of 7 Still Available?

Nov 15, 2001

I can see that SQL server 2000 trial is available for download, but I need to try out 7 for a particular project at work. Is this available for trial download? (Has it ever been?)

Thanks.

View 2 Replies View Related

Different Versions Of MS SQL Server

Sep 23, 2005

Hi all...
I'm a MySQL user and I want to switch to MS SQL Server, I heared that there is more than one type of MS SQL Server and one or two can be downloaded for free. Can someone tell me the different types of MS SQL Server and where can I download those free versions?

View 5 Replies View Related

Different Versions Of SQL On One Server

Sep 25, 2007

Hi,

Our server has SQL Server 2003 installed, I'd like to use SQL Server Express 2005 as I'm about to try and learn ASP.NET and most tutorials use that.

Will installing Express 2005 conflict with the Server 2003? Can both version be run on one server?

Thanks.

View 3 Replies View Related

Synchronized Versions

Jul 23, 2005

I'm running a SQL 7 db on a LAN in city A with other users accessing it fromanother city (city B) over a WAN. Obviously the WAN users are getting muchslower access to the data. One thing I was wondering was if it was possibleto have two versions of the database, one on each server, and have themautomatically synchronize as users at each location make changes. Or, ifthat's not possible, then at least have the city B users get any changesthat the city A users get as they are made.Thanks for any input.Neil

View 5 Replies View Related

Two Versions Of Sql On One Server?

Oct 25, 2006

Is it possible to run both SQL200 standard and SQL2005 Express on thesame server? I need to test a database created in 2005 on ourproduction server but don't want to upgrade our "live" databases yet.

View 2 Replies View Related

32-64 Bit Versions Issue

Jan 23, 2006

I uninstalled the 32-bit Standard version but during install of the 64-bit trial version I got an error that the integration services could not install because the 32-bit version of COM+ was already registered and you can't have both. Need some help how to resolve this issue. Thanks

View 3 Replies View Related

Conflicting Sql Versions

Jan 17, 2008

I have a server with sql 2000 and 2005 installed on it. When I try to connect to the msde 2000 database with an app or with managment studio express I get the following error

"An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 26 - Error Locating Server/Instance Specified) (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: -1)

For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=-1&LinkId=20476"

But When I go through dos and type osql -S(local)database -E
it connects to the correct msde instance. How can I fix this with out uninstalling sql server 2005????

View 3 Replies View Related

.Net Versions Question

Mar 7, 2008

We will be upgrading from SQL 2000 to SQL 2005. From what I have read, as part of the installation of SQL 2005 we will be installing the .Net framework 2.0 and Visual Studio 2005.
We currently have production .Net applications which were developed in Visual Studio 2003 with the .Net framework 1.1.
We plan at some point to upgrade our applications to Visual Basic 2005, but we were planning on upgrading to SQL 2005 first.
I have a couple of questions about this.

1) We are a small shop and the same server which hosts our production applications also hosts SQL server for our model office and test applications. Can we have both versions of the common language runtime running on the same server?

2) Our .Net applications access the SQL data through stored procedures or views. I have run the Upgrade Advisor and it does not look as though there are any signficant upgrade issues with our SQL database objects, so we are tentatively planning on changing the compatibility levels of our databases to 90 after they are imported to SQL 2005. Assuming we take care of any SQL issues that we do have with our database objects, should we expect to encounter problems running our existing applications, under the older version of vb.net, and accessing our databases once we have upgraded to SQL 2005? (Of course we plan to test everything, but I just wanted to know if we should anticipate anything in particular.)

Thanks.

View 6 Replies View Related

SQL Server - Differente Versions

Jan 28, 2008

Hi
If i develop a web application with sql server developement edition, it works fine in my webserver, or my webserver has to have the sql server development too?
I'm interested in sql server report services. if i develop a web application with this tool what kind of version of sql server has to be installed in my webserver?
Thank you

View 2 Replies View Related

DTS & Client Tools Versions

Mar 15, 2001

SQL 2000 Client tools SQL7 SP3 Server back-end.

I have a DTS Package created with SQL2000 client tools, which contains a SQL connection and a sql task (exec sp_who2). When I run the package on my PC it works, when I run the package via SQL Agent it comes back with :-

DTSRun: Loading... Error: -2147287038 (80030002); Provider Error: 0 (0) Error string: The system cannot find the file specified. Error source: Microsoft Data Transformation Services (DTS) Package Help file: sqldts.hlp Help context: 713. Process Exit Code 1. The step failed.

I am not using any files. The DTS Package is called PMC_Test

Here is the dtsrun syntax from the SQL Agent job.

DTSRun /S "APP003" /N "PMC_Test" /E

When I try and open the DTS package using SQL7 client tools I get the same error message.

View 1 Replies View Related

Odbc Dll Versions Don&#39;t Match??

May 15, 2001

I'm trying to correct an error that a user is getting when running SQL Server 7.0 SP3, Desktop edition/ Windows NT 4.0 SP6. The error says that C:WINNTSYSTEM32odbcint.dll and C:WINNTSYSTEM32odbccp32.dll are different versions. I tried to install MDAC 2.5 sp1 to correct this problem but this message continues throughout the install. This is causing sqlagent service to hang. Any ideas of how to reinstall ODBC components without reinstalling the OS?

View 1 Replies View Related

DTS & SQL Client Tools Versions

Mar 14, 2001

Does anyone know of problems when using SQL7 Server and SQL2000 Client tools when editing and saving DTS Packages ?

My SQL 7 Server doesn't seem to recognise the DTS Package if saved from SQL 2000 Client tools, but works happily with packages saved from SQL7.

Can anyone clarify ?

View 2 Replies View Related

MS SQL Server Vs. Run Time Versions Of Other DBs

May 13, 2002

I know this is a very basic question for all of you but I need help.

I am a CPA working with a client to select an accounting & project management software for a construction client. In the top 5 choices, there are 2 that require MS SQL Server as the DB. This client will have about 10-20 users, including project managers & accounting personnel but by DB standards transaction volumes will be low. The company has a few large projects. There is no inhouse IT staff; network administration is outsourced.

The question on the table is this? How much more difficult is it to use MS SQL server in this environment? If all of the client's requirements can be met using a run-time version of Sybase, Pervasive, or FoxPro, isn't this the simplest solution. I don't want to recommend an elephant if it is not needed. I would appreciate your opinion....Thanks

View 2 Replies View Related

Record (entity) Versions...

Jul 9, 2004

Database newbie question: My sample database (T-SQL syntax): CREATE DATABASE sample GO USE sample CREATE TABLE customers (CustomerId int IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED,name varchar(50),address varchar(50)) CREATE TABLE invoices (InvoiceId int IDENTITY(1,1) PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED,date datetime,CustomerId int REFERENCES customers(CustomerId)) INSERT customers (name,address) VALUES ('First Company Ltd.','New York') INSERT customers (name,address) VALUES ('Second Company Ltd.','Washington') INSERT invoices (date,CustomerId) VALUES ('Jan 1, 2004',1) INSERT invoices (date,CustomerId) VALUES ('Jan 2, 2004',1) INSERT invoices (date,CustomerId) VALUES ('Jan 2, 2004',2) SELECT * FROM customers GO CustomerId name address 1 First Company Ltd. New York 2 Second Company Ltd. Washington SELECT i.date,c.name,c.address FROM invoices AS i INNER JOIN customers AS c ON i.CustomerId=c.CustomerId GO date name address 2004-01-01 00:00:00.000 First Company Ltd. New York 2004-01-02 00:00:00.000 First Company Ltd. New York 2004-01-02 00:00:00.000 Second Company Ltd. Washington UPDATE customers SET address='Boston' WHERE name='First Company Ltd.' GO INSERT invoices (date,CustomerId) VALUES ('Jan 3, 2004',1) SELECT * FROM customers GO CustomerId name address 1 First Company Ltd. Boston 2 Second Company Ltd. Washington SELECT i.date,c.name,c.address FROM invoices AS i INNER JOIN customers AS c ON i.CustomerId=c.CustomerId GO date name address 2004-01-01 00:00:00.000 First Company Ltd. Boston 2004-01-02 00:00:00.000 First Company Ltd. Boston 2004-01-02 00:00:00.000 Second Company Ltd. Washington 2004-01-03 00:00:00.000 Second Company Ltd. Boston Is it possible in any of the RDBMS's to make this last query return the following result set? 2004-01-01 00:00:00.000 First Company Ltd. New York 2004-01-02 00:00:00.000 First Company Ltd. New York 2004-01-02 00:00:00.000 Second Company Ltd. Washington 2004-01-03 00:00:00.000 First Company Ltd. Boston

View 4 Replies View Related

Unable To See The Backup Versions? Need Help

May 31, 2007

Frns

Currently i am working with Sql Server 2005 and i am taking daily backups which is going
append same backup file <DB_NAME>.BAK.

Now i am trying to restore this bkp with a new database name and with 2 days before date
image.When i am trying to do that, sql server is not showing the versions of the backups.

Why? is there any reason for that?

Regards,
franky

View 1 Replies View Related

Restore To Diffrent Versions

Aug 22, 2007

hi

i have 2005 express on 2000 sp4

i made a backup devices for the app db
and for every one of the system database.
and with those devices backup and restore.

can i manually configure the system db or i must restore them?
i have an issue where i downloaded and installed v.9.00.2047
while my backups where on v.9.00.1399

tahnks

View 1 Replies View Related

Replication Between Different Versions Of SQL Server

Jul 20, 2005

Hello,We are trying to set up replication between different versions of SQLServer (7 & 2000).This is how the 2 servers are now setup:DB1 - External web-server w/SQL Server 7DB2 - Internal server w/SQL Server 2000REPLICATION SETUPThis is how we need the replication to be set up. They are allTransactional Replications.DISTRIBUTION:This is set up on DB2, which is running on 2000WITH PUBLISHERS ON DB1, AND PULL SUBSCRIPTIONS ON DB2:dbo.Employment_App & dbo.Employ_Jobs (together in one replication)dbo.FeedbackNOTE: This set of replications work some of the time, but make DB1 &DB2 very slow when running. A lot of times, the jobs say "RetryingJob", but they usually will eventually work.WITH PUBLISHERS AND PUSH SUBSCRIPTIONS ON DB2:dbo.Jobsdbo.Releasesdbo.SearchNOTE: This set of replications used to work when DB1 & DB2 both ran onSQL Server 7 with 2000 Enterprise Manager's. But since we moved thedata to an internal server (DB2) that runs on 2000, it doesn't work atall.We've researched the problem, and found an article by MS called"Replication Between Different Versions of SQL Server" athttp://msdn.microsoft.com/library/d...plimpl_4joy.aspthat states that this setup should be possible (on Combination 3 forTransactional Replications).But it's not working at all. Are there some steps that we need tocheck to have replication setup between 2 servers running on differentversions of SQL Server (7 & 2000)? Any & all help & advice isappreciated. Thanks.KWilliams

View 1 Replies View Related

MSDE 2000 Versions

Jul 20, 2005

I was wondering if any of you guys can kindly help me in finding allthe different versions of MSDE 2000 that came out since it's firstrelease. I expected to find something similar like Sun's archive(http://java.sun.com/products/archive/index.html) for MSDE 2000 toobut failed to find after a few hours of browsing at the MicrosoftDownload Center (http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/...displaylang=en).They seem more into promoting their new MSDE 2000 Release A for thetime being but nothing much about the previous versions of MSDE toserve my product testing purposes.All I need is a complete list of different versions of MSDE 2000 withdownloadable links.Thanks in advance.IzzY

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved