NORECOVERY Or RECOVERY OPTION
Mar 15, 2002Hi,
How can I use the NORECOVERY or RECOVERY option to restore the database?
THANKS
Hi,
How can I use the NORECOVERY or RECOVERY option to restore the database?
THANKS
Hello all,
I just restored a SQL 7 db using the Enterprise Manager GUI interface. I
selected the "Leave database nonoperational, but able to restore additional transaction logs" option. I should not have selected this option as I do not have any transaction logs to apply.
Anyway, my question is... Is there a way to mark the database as opertational without running the restore again?
Thanks,
Corey
Is there a Stored Procedure or something else that will tell me if a DB is set to Full or Simple recovery?
Thanks,
Ken Nicholson
Hello,
Do I need to restart service after I set recovery option
"ALTER DATABASE SET RECOVERY XXXX"
can i specify RECOVERY OPTION in CREATE DATABASE?
Thanks
Hello,
I have a file backup of a database from machine 1. I create an empty database with the same name on machine 2 and copied the backup file to machine 2. When I run a restore database, I get "Preceeding restore operation did not specify WITH NORECOVERY OR WITH STANDBY.Restart tehe restore sequence, specify the options for all but the final step. Restore failed"
Database : SQL 7.0 Trying to restore from the Enterprise manager
ANy clues as to what might be wrong.
Thanks, MMS
I'm trying to execute backup job on secondary replica on clustered server(with HA) and I getting the error:execution failed see the maintenance plan and sql server agent job history logs for details.When I going to see the log, it says :configuration option 'user options' changed from 0 to 0.
View 3 Replies View RelatedNovice question ...
We are running a simple replication whereby we backup the PROD server once, restore onto STANDBY and then run a SP every 5 minutes on PROD that dumps the transaction log and then calls a SP on STANDBY to apply the log to STANDBY. My problem is that both the initial restore and all subsequent logs appear to need the "WITH NORECOVERY" option which leaves the database unusable. BOL says to 'use "WITH NORECOVERY" on all log restorations except the final'. Problem is, because the whole process is automatic, we have no way of telling which of the logs is going to be the last !!!. So, my questions are, 1) am I doing it right and 2)what would happen if a log was applied twice, would SQL know and not apply it ?
i have applied transactional log to the database and set the database to recovery mode.
Suddenly i feel i want to recover another transactional log backup which i forgot. how to take database again to norecovery mode to apply that perticular tranasactional log only.
Hi All,
im trying to set up database mirroring and in the initial phase of database restoring im getting some problem.
the scenario is .
1- i create a tempDB on server1(which will be principal server) and backup full and transaction logs.
2- create tempDB in server 2( going to be used as mirror) .
3- restore the full backup of "tempDB" from server1 with NORECOVERY option.
this step results in a message box showing that the restore was successfull...
but the database explorer( management studio) shows the tempDB in (restoring ...) state. and no more operations can be performed with this Database. ( because teh databse isin restoring mode).. please help what this issue is?
Thanks In Advance for any suggestions
I cannot restore a backup file of the transaction log without getting the following message:
ODBC SQL State: 42000
The preceding restore operation did not specify WITH NORECOVERY or WITH STANDBY. Restart the restore sequence, specifying WITH NORECOVERY or WITH STANDBY for all but the final step.
I have tried to do this in Enterprise manager and with the following script with the same results:
RESTORE Log TestDB
FROM DISK='D:MSSQL7BACKUPMMTrans'
WITH NORECOVERY
What am I missing? Thanks in advance for any help.
Can anyone help me with this issue? I restored a full backup with NORECOVERY because I need to restore the differentials as well but I have not been able to access the db. No matter what I seem to try i receive the following error:
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlError: This differential backup cannot be restored because the database has not been restored to the correct earlier state. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo)
Does anyone know what I need to do?
Thank you in advance.
Julio
Hi everyone In my SqlServer Management Studio Express, on start up it shows the server type option, but greyed.So that value is fixed to database engine. ( I'm trying to work on an SqlServer Compact Edition database through the SSMStudiothat's why I'm trying to get this to change.)Besides, after I connect i go to the Object Explorer, expand the server node, and go to Replication.When i expand replication, i get the "Local Subscription" option, but nothng for Publication.( I want to work on Merge Replication, that's why I desparately need Publication to work)Am i missing something here? I did not install SqlServer separately, I only have what comes bundled with the Visual Studio 2005 Setup.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe had a siutation last night in our production environment that forced us to revert back to an earlier version of the database (before a major code rollout that failed). After restoring the days full backup (with NORECOVERY), and then restoring a DIFF backup (FULL RECOVERY and had checked Preserve Replication Settings)...the transaction replication failed.
Message #1
The replication agent has been successfully started. See the Replication Monitor for more information.
Message #2
2011-03-04 15:07:17.566 Copyright (c) 2008 Microsoft Corporation
2011-03-04 15:07:17.566 Microsoft SQL Server Replication Agent: logread
2011-03-04 15:07:17.566
2011-03-04 15:07:17.566 The timestamps prepended to the output lines are expressed in terms of UTC time.
2011-03-04 15:07:17.566 User-specified agent parameter values:
[code]....
I've tried reinitializing the publication/subscription and while that took brand new snapshots and copied it over to the replicated data server, it did not fix the problem.I read from a different post that I could try running "sp_replrestart" but that ran for about a half an hour and didn't appear to do anything but fill up our log files...did I not wait long enough?
The only thing I know to do at this point is to drop the publication on the production server and rebuild it completely (and with all the tables we're replicating that would take quite a bit of time.
We have a requirement to build SQL environment which will give us local high availability and disaster recovery to second site. We have two sites- Site A & Site B. We are planning to have two nodes at Site A and 2 nodes at Site B. All four nodes will be part of same Windows failover cluster. We will build two SQL Cluster, InstanceA will be clustered between the nodes at Site A Server and InstanceB will be clustered between the nodes at Site B, we will enable Always On Between the InstanceA and InstanceB and will be primary owner where data will be written on InstanceA and will be replicated to InstaceB. URL....Now we want we will have instanceC on the Site B and data will be writen from the application available on Site B, will be replicated to the instance on the Site A as replica.
View 6 Replies View RelatedSo I started a new job recently and have noticed a few strange configurations. Typically I would never mess with min memory per query option and index create memory option configuration because i just haven't seen any need to. My typical thought is that if it isn't broke... They have been modified on every single server in my environment.
From Books Online:
• This option is an advanced option and should be changed only by an experienced database administrator or certified SQL Server technician.
• The index create memory option is self-configuring and usually works without requiring adjustment. However, if you experience difficulties creating indexes, consider increasing the value of this option from its run value.
is bulk logged recovery model support point in time recovery
View 9 Replies View RelatedPages on a full recovery model database corrupted, need to ensure data loss is minimal for restore operation am thinking about restoring the latest full backup.
View 4 Replies View Relatedin the process of migrating a big db from server 1 to server 2, we had to roll back the change. I started with taking a full db backup and restoring it on server 2 with norecovery, and then a couple logs with norecovery, and then the last log with recovery.
Is there some way to continue this chain now, I mean to change the db to norecovery, or other way to restore logs.Â
I dont want to do a new full backup.
If I try to do a log restore now i get the message:
Msg 3117, Level 16, State 4, Line 1
The log or differential backup cannot be restored because no files are ready to rollforward.
Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
RESTORE LOG is terminating abnormally.
We have 3 replica AG setup. 2 replicas are in sync/automatic failover, the other(DR Server, different subnet) in asynchronous/manual mode…All these replicas were on sql server 2012, Recently we upgraded DR server to 2014. Since then we have a problem, the AG databases in 2014 instance went into ‘Synchronizing/ in recovery’ state…The SQL server error log has message, the recovery couldn’t start for the database ‘XYZ’…We tried to create a new database and add it to AG , it works for fine for other two 2012 replicas, but on 2014 we see the same issue
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have an issue with a 3 node SQL 2012 Always on availability group. Normal operation is node 1 (primary replica) with node 2 and node 3 as secondary replicas.After some patching, SQL wasn't running on node 1 hence the AG flipped over to node 2. This went unnoticed for some time and the transaction log for one of the AG databases became full on node 2 and node 3. (I think this is because it couldn't commit the transactions on node 1 so couldn't truncate it's t-log?) The DB is using synchronous replication btw.So I started SQL on node 1 and flipped the AG back to node 1 (with a data loss warning but I accepted this).Now the issue is that on node 2 and 3, the DB in question is stuck in a "Reverting / In Recovery" State. I've tried various commands such as ALTER DATABASE SET ONLINE, RESTORE DATABASE WITH RECOVERY etc but these fail stating unable to obtain a lock on the DB.
The weird thing is that on node 1 the state of the DB is "synchronised".how to resolve this issue on node 2 and 3? I've left them overnight (in case they were rolling back transactions, the DB is fairly large) but nothing seems to have happened. remove the DB from the AG in node 2 and 3 and add it back in again, ie recreate the replication?
If you are doing a disaster recovery of an entire SQL 2005 cluster, can you just install SQL server and restore the system database to get the configuration?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a table name “StringResources� which contains resources for different cultures. Right now, whenever admin adds any new resource, it immediately available to end user. Now the new requirement came up. We want admin to add resource first and when he is ready with all the resources for particular culture then only the resources should be available to end user.
Important: StringResource table has SQLCacheDependecy set. So any change for particular culture will invalidate the cache. This how the select statement looks.SELECT dbo.StringResources.resourceType, dbo.StringResources.cultureCode, dbo.StringResources.resourceKey, dbo.StringResources.resourceValue FROM dbo.StringResources
WHERE dbo.StringResources.cultureCode=@cultureCode
Which would be the best option below:
1> Add new Boolean column “Published� and show only resources which are published to end user.
Advantage: No need of extra table.
Disadvantage: This will invalidate the cache every time resource is added even if it’s not published.
Other option
2> Add new temporary table with same structure. When admin add new resource, add it to this temp table and when publish move resources to String Resources table.
Advantage: Admin will have separate working space. It will invalidate cache only when resources are published.
Disadvantage: Need extra table.
How can I get an All option into the cascading prompt?
I want to view data for all states in USA. I find I can't proceed to load report unless I have filled in a value for all prompts. Any help?
Thanks
I have a small doubt.
If we enable AWE option we can have advantage of available physical memory.we can have more memory by using max server memory property.
then why this AWE option comes in to picture.
I read bol but iam not able to understand what exactly happens.
Could any one tell me why this AWE option if we have max server memory property.
Hi,
What is equivalent to OPTION (RECOMPILE) in SQl Server 2000.
Create table #Employee
(
EmpId int IDENTITY,EmpName varchar(30)
)
insert into #Employee(EmpName )
select EmpName from AllEmployees
OPTION (RECOMPILE)
I have a vacation request app I'm designing, and it has a VacationData Table with TotalVac, UsedVac, VacLeft, VacationCarriedOver, and VacCompleted.
I need to take the VacLeft and divide by 2 and place that data in the following two spots, one in the VCO and add it to the TotalVac, which is pulled from another table w/hire date and other info.
I only need to run this on Jan 1 of every year, any suggestions?
I was running a query and it didn't execute stating you have run out of locks
How could I set the locks
thanks
Sejal
I am trying to alter a table that has an identity field to make the column have the not for replication option. I just can't seem to get the syntax down for the alter table command. PLEASE HELP. I know it can't be that hard!!!
View 2 Replies View RelatedIm trying to transfer data from SQL tbl to .xls file through a DTS package.
My problem is that DTS transfers all the data from the source tbl to .xls
file.
But i would like to have the selective data transfer based on some query like ;
select * from tbl where field ='val'
instead of complete data transfer.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Siva
70-229 certification exam measures your ability to design and implement database solutions by using Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition. Candidates for this exam work in a medium to enterprise computing environment that uses SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition. Candidates have at least one year of experience implementing relational databases. I don't have experience on database. Haven't experience on SQL server administration. Suggest me good one resources in low price. What are best option available in market?
View 2 Replies View RelatedFirst off, I apologize for not knowing what I'm talking about and being long winded. I'm trying to determine if SQL Server Express is an option for a client of mine. Their needs are beginning to go beyond what I'm comfortable with in Access, so I'm looking into the option of upgrading to a SQL Server Express back-end with a VB front-end.
Access doesn't require any setup beyond "File, new", so I know nothing about the background work required to get a database running on a platform like SQL Server.
My first concern is what kind of network admin rights do I need to install & use SSE..
It's unlikely that her IT group will just hand us the keys to any of their servers, so all we really have available is what we can put on her network drives. Am I right in assuming that using a SQL Server database would involve more network privileges than just dropping a file on the network and pointing my front end app at it?
With that said, I think I remember seeing something on one of the MSDN pages about setting up a database to run off of a CD-Rom. Could I somehow use this capability to get what I need?
Hello all
I would like to add a couple more fields that the users can query by, more options how would I add in the same stored proecedure, First Name, Date, and IR#?? so they can have the ability to run it by one field or two fields or all the above?? how would I incorporate those in the stored procedure??
CREATE PROCEDURE [SearchByDateExcls]
(@StartDate datetime,
@EndDate datetime)
AS SELECT [IR Number], Date, Inspector, Violation, [Violation Type], Loss, [Loss Type]
FROM dbo.Revised_MainTable
GROUP BY [IR Number], Date, Inspector, Violation, [Violation Type], Loss, [Loss Type]
HAVING (Date BETWEEN @StartDate AND @EndDate)
is this correct
CREATE PROCEDURE [SearchByDateExcls]
(@StartDateServed datetime,
@EndDateServed datetime, @Enter_LastName nvarchar(25), @Enter_Duration nvarchar(10))
AS SELECT IR#, [Date Served], [Reason For Exclusion], Duration, [First Name], [Last Name]
FROM [dbo].[Extended Exclusions]
GROUP BY IR#, [Date Served], [Reason For Exclusion] , Duration, [First Name], [Last Name]
HAVING (Date BETWEEN @StartDateServed AND @EndDateServed, Enter_LastName, @Enter_Duration)
Hi,
I was sreading about NOLOCK that it could prevent deadlocks but could return data which is not committed yet.
1) Should we use NOLOCK with select statements
2) If the transaction isolation level is set appropriately (e.g. Serializable)in the component (for e.g COM+ component) but NOLOCK is specified in the select then would it return uncommitted data. I mean if the transaction is controlled at hihger level then what will be the Pros and Cons of using NOLOCK.
Thanks