Named Instance Connectivity Error - Only Works When Port Number Is Specified??
Sep 27, 2007
I have a new named instance (SQL Server 2005 x64 SP2 (Build 3159) Developer edition) setup with dynamic port selection. A default instance was also running on the server prior to the named instance setup.
SQL Server Browser service is running. Remote connections are configured on the named instance. But still remote clients can only connect when the port number is specified after the instance name (servernameinstancename,9999). Without the port number, "error 26 - Error locating Server/instance specified" is thrown.
Doesn't the SQL Server Browser service eliminate the need for clients to specify the port number? What am I missing?
Thanks.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jun 21, 2015
I have TWO named SQL Server instances (on the same machine) and I need to know the port of each of them, how can I do that? Is it write to check the following:
Which one to take: "TCP Dynamic Ports" or "TCP Port"? and what is the difference between them anyways?
Can the two instances (or more) on the same machine use the same port?!
View 12 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2015
Basically the question is, which number should I pick?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 14, 2004
Thanks for Microsoft's Windows XP Service Pack 2 and Windows Server 2003 that make the security much stronger. However, besides the invisible benefit so far, I have become the victim of this security policy.
I have several named instances of SQL 7/2000 installed in my machine. They are not visible out of the Microsoft new fire wall. I need to access the instances from outside the fire wall, but I don't know which port I should open for the instances.
From SQL online, the default instance of SQL server is connected through TCP/IP by default port 1433. I could successful open that port and made the default instance visible to outside. However, the port 1433 doesn't work for the named instances. SQL online said, the port for named instance is dynamically (by default) chosen the first time the instance is started. So, actually, I have no way to know the port.
Is there anyway that I can check the database or somewhere to get the port that is used by the named instance?
Thanks for any input and recommendation.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2013
I have opened up a port on a remote SQL instance and can see that the port is LISTENING when using the PortQry tool. I have also set the TCP port in the TCP/IP properties in the IPAll section for that instance, yet I am unable to connect and get an error of
Connection Timeout Expired. The timeout period elapsed while attempting to consume the pre-login handshake acknowledgement. This could be because the pre-login handshake failed or the server was unable to respond back in time. The duration spent while attempting to connect to this server was - [Pre-Login] initialization=1; handshake=14998; (.Net SqlClient Data Provider)
I have done this on other instances, although they were default instances, and it has always worked fine.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jul 31, 2014
I'm trying to configure a named instances of SQL Server 2012 SP2 to have specific IP addresses and listen to that IP on port 1433. Alongside this, I have the default instance running on a different IP and listening to that on port 1433.I've managed to get them configured so that they are reachable using the IP, and looking at the log for each they are listening correctly on that IP on port 1433; in addition, the default instance connects fine using the SERVERNAME.However, when I try and connect to the named instance using the SERVERNAME/INSTANCENAME syntax, I receive the following:-
"Cannot connect to SERVERINSTANCE.
Instance failure. (System.Data)"
Configuration for the TCP/IP protocol for that instance is as follows:-
Protocol Tab
Enabled= Yes
Keep Alive = 30000
Listen All = No
IP addresses Tab
IP1
Active = Yes
Enabled = Yes
IP Address = 10.1.1.1
TCP Dynamic Ports = 0
TCP Port = 1433
[code]...
The SQL Browser service is running and prior to switching off Listen To All, I could connect to the instance remotely using the instance name.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 3, 2015
I changed the Port of my named instance to use static port but still error log is giving two values ,why??
spid15sServer is listening on [ 'any' <ipv6> 50152].
spid15sServer is listening on [ 'any' <ipv4> 50152].
ServerServer is listening on [ ::1 <ipv6> 57518].
ServerServer is listening on [ 127.0.0.1 <ipv4> 57518].
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 22, 2015
I have a named sql instance on SQL 2012. The issue is that the clients is having problem connecting to it when the firewall is on, this is not consistent. The connection is fine when I disabled the firewall. When I turned the Windows firewall back on, it will work for awhile and it fails. I checked the SQL configuration manager and saw that a dynamic port is assigned to the named instance. I did put that in the firewall rule and unblock it. I also put TCP 1433 and 1434 as well as the browser service port, TCPUDP 2382 and it still didn't work.What is the best way to determine what port does the named instance are listening?
View 11 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2007
Hi,
I have installed one default and one named instance of SQL Server 2005 Dev. Editition SP2 on my server.
The Named service is configured to use Shared, NamedPipe and TCP (Port 4333).
There is no firewall on the machine. But still i am not able to connect to it form remote computer.
can any one help me with these. this is urgent.
Thanks.
KV
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2006
I got the following error using either NT or SQL Login ('sa') that are sysadmin in my SQL 2005 instance:
Your Account information could not be verified for one or more instances. Ensure that you can connect to all the selected instances using the account information provided. To process further deselect the instances to which connectivity cannot be established.
However, I would login to SQL 2005 named instance, either NT or SQL login 'sa' without any problems to do anything I want because both are sysadmin.
<PS> Note that my default SQL instance in my local server is SQL 2000 and SQL 2005 named instance.
Richard
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 26, 2007
We have two instances of SQL Server 2005 - SP1 installed on one server. The default instance starts very slowly. When looking at the log I can see the delay is due to Resource Manager based upon the following error.
Message
Resource Manager Creation Failed: 0x8004d102
(XACT_E_DUPLICATE_GUID)
What does this mean?
What would cause this to happen?
How do I resolve the problem?
Thanks, Dave
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2008
Greetings,
I have a VB 2003 .NET application that I wrote for a customer that connects to a named instance of SQL 2000. Until recently it has been working fine. Lately the program either pops a timeout failure within a few seconds or a general network error. I've increased the connection timeout settings to 90 seconds but the error still pops within a few seconds. I'm thinking something has changed in the environment that prevents a clean connection to the named instance of SQL server.
How should this issue be troubleshoot to determine the problem and what areas need to be looked at?
Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Hi. I'm a SQL Server novice, so apologies if any of this sounds simple.I am running Windows XP SP2, and have just installed SQLServer 2000. Ineed another application to connect to SQLServer, and am specifying itto do so via localhost:1433, but keep getting an error whenever I trydoing so saying it cannot connect to the database. A colleague of minehas the exact same set up on his machine, and he can connect to SQLServer fine. Running 'netstat -a' at the command line on his machinereveals that the system is listening to port 1433/ms-sql-s. Runningnetstat on my machine shows that the system is not listening to1433/ms-sql-ms. I have checked in Network Config in SQLServerEnterprise Manager, and TCP/IP is set to be using 1433.To confirm this, my application can connect over the network to mycolleague's SQL Server. but he cannot connect over the network to mine.So I'm pretty sure the issue is related to this 1433/ms-sql-s problem.Does anyone know how to resolve this? Many thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 12, 2006
I have access to the default instance of a SQL Server ..... I have access to the QA only .. by reading the registry through the QA I get to knw that there are additional 4 more instances on the Server ..... is is possible to get the port on which they are listening using the QA ....
I knw that we can go to the servers network utility & see it there in the TCP /IP ... but i dont have access to that , neither do i have access to the error logs that tell me , on which port is SQL Server listening to
Can someone help
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 22, 2015
I've two instances(Default, Named[dynamicsFINANCE]) running on SQL server 2014. However, when I try to connect to named instance say (dynamicsFINANCE) using SQL authentication from local SSMS, I get below error message:
A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 26 - Error Locating Server/Instance Specified) (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: -1)
I assigned a static port number to the named instance [dynamicsFINANCE] 1450. I also setup the firewall rule to allow access to Port 1450.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2014
I have a 3 node cluster on which I have installed SSAS as it's own insntance. I have created this as a named instance and can connect to it by serverinstance if I'm on the server itself. However from my desktop I get the error saying instance was not found on server name.
I have defined an alternate port and setup firewall rules and can connect via server:port but not serverinstance. Prior to making this change SSAS was running on default port of 2383 and I could connect just by servername.
I have read many articles for previous versions saying that clustered SSAS will always use 2383 and that you must connect just using servername. However and this is were it gets strange. I have a 2 node UAT cluster with SSAS setup exactly the same way I've described above and I can connect from my desktop as serverinstance.
Should I be able to connect as serverinstances for a named clustered instance in 2012 ?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2007
Hi, I have a task in hand to migrate (upgrade) from SQL2K named instance to SQL2K5 default instance. There are many intranet applications touching current SQL2K. I would like to perform this upgrade such that I don't have to touch any application code - meaning I don't have to change the connectionstring to point to new Default instance. How can I achieve this?
So, in otherwords, here is what I want to achieve:
Current Server: SQL2K: SERVER_AINSTANCE_A (named instance)
Upgraded Server: SQL2K5: SERVERB (default instance)
If I have both default, I could achive this by setting up DNS alias after migration done so that any call for SERVER_A would point to SERVER_B. But in my case, I don't have SERVER_A, I have named instance. Is there any solution?
Regards,
Vipul
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2006
Hi all,
i have installed SQL client instance on my Desktop "Machine-A", and i used to connect to SQLServer2000 running on another "Machine-B" by using valid username and password.
i created a DTS package and i used to run it. im very confused how the communication happens between the two machines and which process run where and which initiates which and which machine allocates waht resources. im really interested to know all these things. if any one know plz help me out.
Thanks in advance.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2001
I am trying to set up a Named Instance of SQL 2000 on the same machine that has a default instance of SQL 7.0. The setup always completes and I am able to register the Named Instance of the SQL Server with which it was installed on. However, when I try to connect the users to the database, with both windows and SQL authentication, I receive a SQL server not found error. I have tried an alias setup as well as physically specifying the port number in settup up an ODBC connection.
Has anyone ran into similar problems?
Also, has anyone been able to successfully complete the process as mentioned above?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 2, 2007
I have a server with sql server 2005 installed as the default instance -- I have a piece of software that needs SQL2000 to be the default instance. Is there a way other than install new sql2005 named instance and move databases to rename my SQL2005 instance from <machinename> to <machinename>sql05 for example?
Bryan
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2006
Hi all,
little connectivity problem, I hope this hasn't been asked before, I've tried searching and haven't found much sign of it.
We have an app which runs on sales reps laptops using MSDE (or in this particular case SQL 7 Desktop Edition) and uses merge replication to send up orders, pull down products etc. All worked fine untill we set it up for one particular customer who wanted to use their existing SQL 7 install with it and a VPN connection for replication.
The problem is that with the VPN connected nothing (the app, the merge dll or even enterprise manager) could connect to the local instance (but can see the main server across the VPN). It seems to be some kind of funny routing issue whereby the VPN software sends local traffic off across the VPN which has no idea what to do with it. Using the Client Network Utility I've been able to setup an alias for the local machine forcing it to use named pipes, which worked brilliantly allowing access when connected to the VPN and allowing replication to work. Unfortunatly with this enabled the problem now occurs when the laptop is disconnected, nothing can connect to the local instance.
I'm kind of a newbie wrt to managing SQL server, can anyone suggest anything on how I should be setting this up ?
Thanks in advance,
Steve.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2006
I have SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition (sp3a) running on a windows 2003 (sp4) Server.
It is a Production Server with 3 NAMED Instances and NO Default Instance.
Does anyone know if I can rerun the SQL Server Install and add a DEFAULT Instance to this box without disrupting the other Named Instances???
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2007
I installed SQL Server 2005 recently on a cluster. I didn't go for the default instance and instead I named the instance option. Now I would like to migrate everything from the named instance to the default instance, which I haven't yet installed.
Is this an easy process? What about the logins and the maintenance plans and jobs? Is there anything else I need to be aware of?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 13, 2007
Hi
I've never had to do this, but when I downloaded the Web Workflow Approvals Starter Kit, it requested that I install the database into a User Instance of .SQLEXPRESS.
Now the problem is, I've installed it onto a default instance, so I was wondering whether you can create a named instance on top of a default instance... and if so, how would you do that?
Cheers
Chris
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2007
The box I am trying to connect to is running two instances of SQL Server.
There is a SQL Server 2005 instance which is the default. There is a SQL Server 2000 instance which is named 'SQLSERVER'.
I can connect to the SQL Server 2000 instance no problem:<add key="ConnectionString" value="server=MYPCSQLSERVER;database=mydatabase;user id=****;password=****" />
However, I am having trouble connecting to the Default SQL Server 2005 instance. I have tried:
<add key="ConnectionString" value="server=MYPC;database=mydatabase;user id=****;password=****" />
but it doesn't work. I have tried explicitly setting SQL Server 2005 to use port 1434 (as SQL Server 2000 is running on port 1433), and then used:
<add key="ConnectionString" value="server=MYPC,1434;database=mydatabase;user id=****;password=****" />
but this doesn't work either.
Am I mssing something here? Any help much appreciated
Thanks...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 17, 2007
If you were asked to install SQL 2005 on a machine, would u install a default instance or a named one? And why would u choose one over the other?? Also, r there any issues with using a default instance?
Thank you for all your help.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 29, 2007
I have SQL 2005 Std Edition, Mixed Security, and remotely connecting by TCP/IP works great.
Named Pipes (and the SQL Native Client) is the only issue.
The problem _appears_ to be that I'm not authenticated under the SQL Machine; however, I'm not attempting to use Windows Authentication, I'm strictly using SQL, so I do not understand why I'm having a problem.
My reasoning for the above conclusion, is that the command "net use \[server_name]ipc$" will allow me to connect to the server, and Named Pipes will begin working. Again, remember that I'm only trying to access named pipes using SQL Authentication.
I've read through everything on the forum and tried everything I could find. Below are the answers from the most common suggestions posted here:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Version: SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.1399.06 (Intel X86)
This is the Default & Only Instance of SQL 2005, named: MSSQLSERVER
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. The error message with the SQL Native driver (v 9.00.3042):
Error 1326, SQL State 08001
[Microsoft][SQL Native Client]Named Pipes Provider: Could not open a connection to SQL Server [1326]
2. The error messgae with the ODBC SQL driver (v 03.85.1117):
Error 1326, SQL State 01000
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][Named Pipes]Connection Open (Connect())
Connection Failed: SQL Error 17, State 08001
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][Named Pipes]SQL Server does not exist or access denied.
3. Local Connection on Win2003 Server works fine for IP & Named Pipes
4. Remote Connection using SQL Authentication
WORKS for IP, does not work for Named Pipes
5. Absolutely *no firewalls* or blocked ports are being used on either machine
6. Configuration Manager & Surface Area Config -- both enabled TCP/IP & Named Pipes
Currently listening on ALL IP's. The LOG reports:
Server is listening on [ 'any' <ipv4> 1433].
Server named pipe provider is ready to accept connection on [ \.pipesqlquery ].
Server is listening on [ 127.0.0.1 <ipv4> 1434].
Dedicated admin connection support was established for listening locally on port 1434.
7. Can telnet to server on 1433
8. Status of NETSTAT on server:
C:...>netstat -ano|findstr 1433
TCP 0.0.0.0:1433 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 656
C:...>netstat -ano|findstr 1434
TCP 127.0.0.1:1434 0.0.0.0:0 LISTENING 656
UDP 0.0.0.0:1434 *:* 2544
9. Tried both named instance and unnamed instance (although I'm not sure
if I'm passing the 'named' instance properly):
Tested: \MYSERVERpipesqlquery
Tested: \MYSERVERpipeMSSQL$MSSQLSERVERsqlquery
(although the named instance doesn't work on the server either)
10.I've setup an alias for the named pipe connection. This was based on a suggestion
posted here, but didn't work.
11.I've removed the shared-memory protocol, on another suggestion here, but no luck.
12.If I execute "net use \[server_name]ipc$" it asks for credentials and if I
enter the server credentials I have no problem with executing that command.
In other words the logged-on user is not an authenticated member of the server;
however, I'm not attempting to use windows authentication, I'm using
SQL Authentication.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you in advance for any suggestions,
Rusten
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 5, 2007
Hi all,I'm having some trouble with connecting to SQL server instance latelywithout adding a port number. I used to be able to always connect toinstance without having to input SQLSERVER,portnumber. However nowthis is not the case. I doing this through an ADO connection object,and creating the connection string. Does anyone know if there was arecent Microsoft update or patch that would've cause this to stopallowing me to connect to a SQL instance without having to put in theport information? Thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2007
1. Is there a quick way to find out what port number SQL is listening to? I have 10 instances running on one server and I could find out by going to SQL log but it's bit time consuming.
2. quick way to change the port number?
thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 31, 2014
I installed a default SQL Server 2012 instance on Windows Server 2012.I enabled the SQL Browser and changed the TCP port of the instance to 1435. I changed port 1433 to 1435 I was able to connect to the instance using SSMS on another server. Now I have to enter Servername,1435 to make a connection.Why does the SQL Browser not resolve the servername to the right IP address and port 1435? Why am I not able to make a connection when I enter the servername or <servername>MSSQLSERVER? Is a SQL Browser only resolving named instances?This works fine for a named instance. Is there something special about default instances or the SQL Browser?
View 15 Replies
View Related
Aug 25, 2015
Having problems running the BPA for 2012. We setup using a clustered environment, SQL Server installed using default instance, and a static port not 1433. When I try to run the BPA using the instance name it says it doesn't exist, and won't let me add a port number. However, if I use MSSQLSERVER as the instance name it runs with no port specified and returns results. I assume that it doesn't require a port because the default instance would pull from the Browser Service and the using MSSQLSERVER is the same as running the default on a standalone server. Are those assumptions correct?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 2000
Does anyone know how to change the default port number of 1433 to somethinig else?
Thanks!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 1, 2004
Hi,
Can anyone tell me how to find out on what port number a paticular sqlserver named instance is running...
thanks..
View 5 Replies
View Related
