Need Help, DTS Is Running Extremely Slow!!!
May 13, 2004
Hi guys.
I have a DTS package ON SQL 2000 which transfer data from AS400 to SQL 2000 using an ODBC Client Access 5.1 (The DSN was configured by a sysdmin on the AS400 so it is configured properly).
When i execute the package manualy (by right click and "execute package") the package runns fine and ruterns data in no time (Eproximatly 30000 rows in 15 sec).
The problem starts when a job executes the same packagee!!!
When i start the job, the DTS package is running Very Very Slow!!!!
sometime it takes Hours to return a few rows! and it seems that it is stuck.
The SQLAgent is running as a NT Account with Administrator rights, and has full access to the AS400!! so the problem is not the Agent.
by monitoring the AS400, i have noticed that the job/DTS is retreaving the first fetch quickly , and then it is in a waiting status
i have tried everything and cant seem to get this problem fixed
Does anyone know what could be the problem?
I Need Help Quick!!!
Thank You
Gil
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Apr 23, 2008
Hey Guys
I have a huge speed issue on one or two of my SQL Tables. I have included the basic design below.
Structure
Id
ParentId
Name
Group
Id
ParentId
Name
Weight
Products
Id
Name
StructureProducts
StructureId
ProductId
Imported
StructureGroups
StructureId
GroupId
GroupProducts
GroupId
ProductId
AnswerDates
Id
AssessmentDate
Scores <-- This table is the slow table
AnswerDateId
StructureId
GroupId (nullable)
ProductId (nullable)
Score >= 0 && <= 100
Ok, Structures are the start of everything. Structures, have children. If a group/product is Linked to a parent or child structure then that group/product is visible along the structure tree flow path. Groups, like structure have children. And also like structures, if a group is given a product, then that product is visible through the structure tree flow path.
Example:
Earth [Structure]
- Asia [Structure]
--- China [Structure]
--- Japan [Structure]
----- Computer Stuff [Group]
------- Desktops [Group]
------- Servers [Group]
------- Laptops [Group]
--------- HP [Product]
--------- Dell [Product]
--------- Fujitsu [Product]
- Europe [Structure]
--- Germany [Structure]
----- Berlin [Structure]
--- Italy [Structure]
----- Rome [Structure]
----- Venice [Structure]
- America [Structure]
--- United States of America [Structure]
----- New York [Structure]
------- Computer Stuff [Group]
--------- Desktops [Group]
--------- Servers [Group]
--------- Laptops [Group]
----------- HP [Product]
----------- Dell [Product]
------- Home Stuff [Group]
--------- Kitchen Stuff [Group]
--------- bedroom Stuff [Group]
----- Washington [Structure]
------- Computer Stuff [Group]
--------- Desktops [Group]
--------- Servers [Group]
--------- Laptops [Group]
----------- HP [Product]
----------- Dell [Product]
----------- Acer [Product]
------- Home Stuff [Group]
--------- Kitchen Stuff [Group]
--------- bedroom Stuff [Group]
----- Chicago [Structure]
------- Computer Stuff [Group]
--------- Desktops [Group]
--------- Servers [Group]
--------- Laptops [Group]
------- Home Stuff [Group]
--------- Kitchen Stuff [Group]
--------- bedroom Stuff [Group]
- Africa [Structure]
--- South Africa [Structure]
----- Johannesburg [Structure]
------- Computer Stuff [Group]
--------- Desktops [Group]
--------- Servers [Group]
--------- Laptops [Group]
----------- Acer [Product]
------- Home Stuff [Group]
--------- Kitchen Stuff [Group]
--------- bedroom Stuff [Group]
----- Durban [Structure]
----- Capte Town [Structure]
- Australasia [Structure]
So the initial steps that happen (with regards to Scoring) are as follows.
1. Insert root score (which would be for a structure, a group, an answer date and either a product or no product
2. Score the next group up along the treeview, using the scores for the groups at the same level as the original group (0 score if no score exists).
3. Continue this till GroupTree is at root (parentid == null)
4. Using the next structure up along the treeview, repeat steps 2 & 3.
5. Continue steps 4 until Structuree is at root (parentid == null)
Example
Scoring a product for Johannesburg Acer Laptop would go as follows
1. Initial score for [Acer] product against Group [Laptop] for Johannesburg.
2. Calculate Score for all products (productid = null) against Laptop for Johannesburg
3. Calculate Score for [Acer] product against Group [Computer Stuff] for Johannesburg
4. Calculate Score for all products against Group [computer Stuff] for Johannesburg
5. Calculate score for [Acer] product against all root groups for Johannesburg
5.1. Group [Comptuer Stuff] and [Home Stuff]
6. Calculate score for all products against all root groups for Johannesburg
6.1. Group [Comptuer Stuff] and [Home Stuff]
7. Calculate score for [Acer] Product against Group Laptop for South Africa
8. Calculate Score for all products (productid = null) against Laptop for South Africa
9. Calculate Score for [Acer] product against Group [Computer Stuff] for South Africa
10. Calculate Score for all products against Group [computer Stuff] for South Africa
11. Calculate score for [Acer] product against all root groups for South Africa
11.1. Group [Comptuer Stuff] and [Home Stuff]
12. Calculate score for all products against all root groups for South Africa
12.1. Group [Comptuer Stuff] and [Home Stuff]
13. Calculate score for [Acer] Product against Group Laptop for Africa
14. Calculate Score for all products (productid = null) against Laptop for Africa
15. Calculate Score for [Acer] product against Group [Computer Stuff] for Africa
16. Calculate Score for all products against Group [computer Stuff] for Africa
17. Calculate score for [Acer] product against all root groups for Africa
17.1. Group [Comptuer Stuff] and [Home Stuff]
18. Calculate score for all products against all root groups for Africa
18.1. Group [Comptuer Stuff] and [Home Stuff]
etc. etc. etc...
This basicly coveres the concept behind the basic scoring methodology. Now the methodology splits into 2. The first Methodology 1, say it should do these calculations using the Exact same date as the original scored date. (Ie. if i do a score today, only scores on today will be used in the calculations). The other, Methodology 2, says that it should do the calculations on the latest available date. (Ie. If i do a score today, only scores from today and the latest before today will be used in the calculations).
Now to add another problem to this already complex process, is that each Group and each product within a structure can have either of the 2 scoring methodologies assigned to it. Also, products can only be scored against the structures and groups that they are assigned to. Ie, Acer exists in Laptop Group, in Johannesburg or South Africa or Africa, but doesnt exist in New York.
Ok, so now that i've explained briefly how this scoring works, let me get to the heart of the problem. Basicly its speed (can clearly see why), though the speed issue only comes
up in 1 Place. And that is where it has to look backwards for the latest available score for the required group, structure and product.
For this to happen i wrote a function
ALTER FUNCTION [dbo].[GetLatestAnswerDateId]
( @StructureId INT,
@GroupId INT,
@ProductId INT,
@AnswerDateId INT )
RETURNS INT
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @Id INT
DECLARE @Date DATETIME
SELECT TOP 1 @Date = [Date]
FROM [dbo].[AnswerDate]
WHERE [Id] = ISNULL(@AnswerDateId, [Id])
ORDER BY [Date] DESC
SELECT TOP 1 @Id = ad.id--gs.[AnswerDateId]
FROM [dbo].[Scoring] gs
INNER JOIN [dbo].[AnswerDate] ad ON ad.Id = gs.AnswerDateId
WHERE [StructureId] = @StructureId
AND ISNULL([GroupId], -1) = ISNULL(@GroupId, -1)
AND ISNULL([ProductId], -1) = ISNULL(@ProductId, -1)
AND [Date] <= @Date
ORDER BY [Date] DESC
RETURN @Id
END
Now on small amounts of data (1000 rows or so) its quick, though that is due to the fact that the data is minimal, but on large amounts of data this function runs for along time. Specificly in the context of the following when there is 6 months of scoring data (100 000+ rows) to peruse.
SELECT [StructureId], [GroupId], [AnswerDateId], [ProductId], [Score]
FROM [Scoring]
WHERE AnswerDateId = GetLatestAnswerDateId([Structure], [GroupId], [ProductId], null)
AND [StructureId] = South Africa
AND [GroupId] = Computer Stuff
AND [ProductId] = Acer
Any idea's on how to make this quick? or quicker?
My Current runtime for calculating the 2500 base scores (totals 100 000+- rows) takes 15 hours. Though this is an initial calculation and is only supposed to be done once.
Also, this calculations are all correct, so my only issue itself is the speed of the entire process.
Thanks In Adance
Jonathan
WARNING: Running on cold coffee!
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2005
Hi,I have a table defined asCREATE TABLE [SH_Data] ([ID] [int] IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL ,[Date] [datetime] NULL ,[Time] [datetime] NULL ,[TroubleshootId] [int] NOT NULL ,[ReasonID] [int] NULL ,[reason_desc] [nvarchar] (255) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_ASNULL ,[maj_reason_id] [int] NULL ,[maj_reason_desc] [nvarchar] (255) COLLATESQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS NULL ,[ActionID] [int] NULL ,[action_desc] [nvarchar] (255) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_ASNULL ,[WinningCaseTitle] [nvarchar] (255) COLLATESQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS NULL ,[Duration] [int] NULL ,[dm_version] [nvarchar] (255) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_ASNULL ,[ConnectMethod] [nvarchar] (255) COLLATESQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS NULL ,[dm_motive] [nvarchar] (255) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_ASNULL ,[HnWhichWlan] [nvarchar] (255) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_ASNULL ,[RouterUsedToConnect] [nvarchar] (255) COLLATESQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS NULL ,[OS] [nvarchar] (255) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS NULL ,[WinXpSp2Installed] [nvarchar] (255) COLLATESQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS NULL ,[Connection] [nvarchar] (255) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_ASNULL ,[Login] [nvarchar] (255) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS NULL,[EnteredBy] [nvarchar] (255) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_ASNULL ,[Acct_Num] [int] NULL ,[Site] [nvarchar] (255) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS NULL ,CONSTRAINT [PK_SH_Data] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED([TroubleshootId]) ON [PRIMARY]) ON [PRIMARY]GOWhich contains 5.6 Million rows and has non clustered indexes on Date,ReasonID, maj_Reason, Connection. Compared to other tables on the sameserver this one is extremely slow. A simple query such as :SELECTSD.reason_desc,SD.Duration,SD.maj_reason_desc,SD.[Connection],SD.aolEnteredByFROM dbo.[Sherlock Data] SDWhere SD.[Date] > Dateadd(Month,-2,Getdate())takes over 2 minutes to run ! I realise the table contains severallarge columns which make the table quite large but unfortunately thiscannot be changed for the moment.How can i assess what is causing the length of Query time ? And whatcould i possibly do to speed this table up ? The database itself isrunning on a dedicated server which has some other databases. None ofwhich have this performance issue.Anyone have any ideas ?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 17, 2007
Hello! I have a query that join five tables and returns around 45000 rows that takes no more than a minute to execute, in management studio, on a SQL Server 2005, 2CPU 32 bit(dual core), 4GB and RAID5 disk system. The O/S is Windows 2003 sp2 Standard Edition.
When the same query is executed in SSRS2005, with some drilldown and summary of drilldown levels, it never stops to execute.
Looking at the hardware in the performance monitor reveals nothing strange except that % CPU-time is around 40 percent. Memory resources over 2 GB are available all the time.
Any suggestions is appreciated!
Any problems with SQL Server 2005 source database running on SQL Server 2000 compatibility level?
Thomas Ivarsson
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2007
On a dual opteron server, viewing the properties of a task inside a data flow was immediate up until this morning.
We just installed SP2, rebooted, and now you right-click on any task and it takes between 30 secs and 5 minutes before the context menu pops-up.
The server is 99% idle, most of the 16 Gigs of memory are idle as well.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 17, 2006
I have a package that reads the contents of 11 Excel files into various tables. Opening this package in the designer, or with DTExecUI is extremely slow. In both cases when I open the package is takes over 10 minutes to do anything. Visual Studio gives the "Visual Studio is Busy" message for 10 minutes and DTExecUI just hangs. DTExecUI actually hangs twice, once when opening the package and a second time when clicking "Execute" (totalling over 20 minutes). It seems like no matter how I try to run the package it will always hang for 10 minutes before running with no status message or anything. Once it runs it completes quickly with no errors.
The various tasks in the package are fairly simple, most being Source > Data Conversion > Destination.
Any suggestions?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2007
Hallo
i'm experiencing an extremely slow connection from a WXPP Sp2 client to a MSSQL2000 running on a W2k server. The client is running a VB6 application that connect with Windows authentication: every form requesting data opens with a long delay at the first launch; next attempts run normally fast.
In the same LAN there are some others identical clients, all running fine.
Every other network activity from that client is ok.
Where should i start to investigate from?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2006
Hi folks,
I'm working within VS2005/Business Intel studio environment. I've got one master package, which loads about 18 sub-packages as tasks.
After openin the master package (and waiting 5-10 minutes for the packages to open and validate), maneuvering within the IDE is nearly impossible, it is so slow. Context menus can take 30 seconds to open. Certian operations, like closing a window, seem to hang the environment.
Does anyone have any feedback about this kind of ide performance problem?
Thanks, Scott
View 10 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2007
I had installed SQL 2005 in my server (very high spec server).
but i wonder why every time i launch the management studio, it tooks forever to load... about 5 minutes.
When i right click on a table and click on view properties, it can takes up to 5 minutes to display the detail.
Is there any setting / configuration that i configured wrongly?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 8, 2000
I have a dts job set up to transfer 550,000 records from a dbf file into a sql server. If I just let it run, there is a 9-10 minute delay, then it starts. If I try to schedule a job, it fails completely. I looked up ways to get it to execute quicker, mainly going to the advanced tab of the transform arrow and making the inserts 1000 at a time, the table locked, turning constraints off. Any advice on how to speed it up or why the job is failing?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2002
Hi All
Last week, we upgraded to sql2000 from 6.5. Everything went on fine. we re-compiled all the procedures. When i try to run a procedure, its running for long time - more than 10 hours (in sql 6.5 it runs for 50 mins). do i need to set any procedure cache?.
Also, the server CPU usuage is constantly high - more than 80%. It was fine till last week.
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance
Jaya
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2006
i have written a SP, but it eventually runs slower. i have to run this SP 500 times.
do you know what is causing that?
View 13 Replies
View Related
Jul 1, 2007
when i turn on my pc, it takes about 10 minutes from turning on to actually be able to use.
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 2, 2001
Our server is running. There are no locks, and server has been rebooted but the problem is still there. This has been going on for some time now. I intend to restart the server. Does anybody have a quick solution, please help. Thanks for your assistance!!
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 17, 2001
Please what do I look out for 6.5 if I want to troubleshoot for slow running.
Thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 6, 2001
Hi,
When first time I start my sql server is running faster. After 10 to 15 days later, sql sever performance is very slow. After I restart SQL service, to become normal.
Thanks
Mohan
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 13, 1999
Hi list,
I'm a long time lurker on this list and really enjoy the discussions, although I rarely get a chance to participate.
Here is my situation: We are importing chunks of data (500 records at a time) from a C++ interface. The records have to be transformed before inserting into the target table which I am doing using a stored proc which is working fine. The records are in memory in C++ and the programmer is looping through the records building inserts into a temp table through ADO (which my proc picks up). The server business object is using the connection.execute method which is inserting one record at a time. That part of the process is taking over 15 seconds for 500 records which is the bulk of the total time.
My question is: Using ADO is there a better way to insert these records into the temp table? I see mention of a recordset interface but my programmers are new to ADO and since I am the DBA and have never used ADO, I am not sure what to tell them.
Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
shawn
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2004
I have linked three SQL Servers together, and have written a stored proc that has a cursor that joined three tables from one of the linked servers. When I pull the SQL out of the cursor definition and run it in a query window it runs fine, but when I run the stored proc that simply steps through the same select result set it is too slow for words. It also throws a warning about serial isolation levels. Is there any way I can fix this.
David
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 2, 2004
Hi,
Our main production server has started running slow, it is a dual zeon thingy with plenty of ram so hardware is not an issue.
Basically a service connects to the database and executes a few stored procs, the only way I can get the system up to speed again is to recompile one of the SPs but that is only a temporary fix.
Anyone had a similar thing?
Can anyone give me help on performance tuning in SQL server 2000.
Thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2008
Hello All,
I have two procedures being run one after the other.
when I run proc1 it runs for about 15 min.
Now the proc2 is dependent on proc1, when I run proc2 it runs for 45 min.
If I run both the proc's simultaneously through .net code it takes more than 1 hour. Can anyone of you tell me where would be the problem.
Thanks in Advance.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2007
Hi, when the following function is used within the where statement of a select statement it runs very slowly, anyone know why?
ALTER FUNCTION [dbo].[fn_GetLastDayOfLVPeriod] ( @pInputDate DATETIME )
RETURNS DATETIME
BEGIN
DECLARE @vLVDPeriod varchar(4)
DECLARE @vLVDYear varchar(4)
DECLARE @vOutputDate DATETIME
SELECT @vLVDPeriod = LVDPeriod
FROM dbo.tblMIDates
WHERE CONVERT(varchar(8), Date, 112) = CONVERT(varchar(8), @pInputDate, 112)
SELECT @vLVDyear = LVDYear
FROM dbo.tblMIDates
WHERE CONVERT(varchar(8), Date, 112) = CONVERT(varchar(8), @pInputDate, 112)
SELECT @vOutputDate = MIN(Date)
FROM dbo.tblMIDates
WHERE LVDPeriod = @vLVDPeriod
AND LVDYear = @vLVDyear
RETURN @vOutputDate
END
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2007
hi
if suppose one query is running slow than what steps we can follow to optimize it...
this question is asked me in interview.
thanx
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 29, 2001
Hi,
I have SQLServer 6.5 SP5a update running on Windows NT 4.0 SP6
with 4 gig RAM and 4 processor.
Suddenly the SQL 6.5 jobs running on the production server started running very very slow. A job that suppose to run in 30 minutes are running like 2 hours and completing successfully.
(I suspect the after the Norton Anti virus automatic live update may be the reason but not the Second Vulnerability as mentioned by Microsoft Bulletin last week)
I check the SQLServer, ran the performance monitor, checked pagefiles, disk space, databases,memory, tempdb. Everything seems to be normal.
I rebooted the server, checked any other process making that slow. But no use.
Please help me out with this issue as this is a production and the CRM applications from the clients uses the database server.
Thanks in advance,
Anu
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2004
All,
I have been tapped to help with fixing a reporting tool. We have a Sql Server database/crystal reports(10) setup. I havent had the chance to look at the tables in the DB yet, but I was told that aggregate tables were used. In my past experience with crystal reports, we used database views to feed crystal reports (in Oracle). I was thinking that I could somehow use views instead of tables and then try to re-index the base tables and compile satitics (if theres such a thing with Sql Server). I was also going to look into bottlenecking and locking (table locking as opposed to row or page locking for the lookup tables...to reduce overhead on the main tables) but, I'm not sure if it'll make a difference since this is just a demo server with no major traffic hitting it yet.
The question is, does anyone have any experience with crystal reports running slow with Sql Server, what should I look out for??
'Wale
View 9 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2008
Hi all,
I'm having what you might call an optimisation issue - but I'm also not sure if my approach to this problem is right. I've spent the whole day trying various methods but none seem to be performing as admirably as I'd hoped.
Basically, here's the scenario:
1. Log files are being inserted into a SQL table via Log Parser 2.2.
2. I have a lookup table of ip address ranges to countries and other geographic data.
3. Once the log row has been inserted from Log Parser, I want to update the same log table with data from the lookup table.
The main problem seems to be the updating (the initial insert from Log Parser is lightning quick).
I initially wrote a trigger on AFTER INSERT on the log table that converted the actual user's IP address into IPNumber format using a simple algorithm, then pumped the IPNumber into a quick select query which retrieved the geolocation data. Then, in the same trigger, there was an update statement which basically said:
update dbo.Logs
set [Country] = @Country
where [IpNumber] = @IpNumber and [Country] = Null
Therein lies the problem. The update statement slows everything down to almost a standstill and also seems to obtain a lock on the table.
Critical factors:
1. The log table must remain readable.
2. The query must execute in seconds -- not over half hour :)
I've experimented with various combinations of indexing, so far to no avail.
Any suggestions would be very much appreciated.
Regards
View 10 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2007
Hi all,
I am having a problem ,SQL server is running very slow.This is happening some days only.For example my stored procedure ususally runs less than 2 minutes, some days will take 13minutes.I dont understand the problem.All the stored procedure having the same problem.Sorry, I am not a DBA,basically a devloper.Daily morning we are taking the DB backup and indexes already applied.DB size 10461.06 MB,RAM 4GB,CPU usage is less than 50%,This is a Cinema Database,so lot of users are accessing at same time(Web,IVR,cinema ticket counters etc).We are using SQL reports.Because of the stored procedure running slow,can not view the reports.pls advice..
please help me..If you need some more information please ask ..
Thanks in advance.
View 16 Replies
View Related
Jan 27, 2006
Hi friends
after working visual studio (on my report model project) few minutes it runs too slow. i mean clicking on entities ,attributes takes ages to finish. I opened task manager i see "devenv.exe" is taking more than 800,000 k !!
am using sql server 2005 standard edition.
have you seen similar problem.
Thanks for your help.
View 19 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2008
We have a stored procedure which is running fine on a SQL server 2000 from Query Analyzer. However, when we try to execute the same stored procedure from ADO.NET in an executable, the execution is hung or takes extremely long. Does anyone have any ideas or suggestions about how it could happen and how to fix. thanks
View 22 Replies
View Related
Apr 6, 2007
I support a website (ASP.NET 2.0) where recently users have been unable to insert data due to timeout issues. The functionality executes a query that inserts a single row into a SQL Server 2005 db table. I tried running this query from the backend, and it took 4:48 to insert a single row! Interestingly, after that initial agony any similar inserts I tried took no time whatsoever. I have checked the execution plan, but unfortunately don't really know what I'm looking for with inserts, as most of my experience with execution plans is with select statements. Any resources anyone could point me to for troubleshooting this would be much appreciated.
Thanks,
-Dave
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 27, 2007
I have a SELECT TOP query in order to return x number of top records from a table which has the indexing service enabled on it, such as this :
SELECT TOP(15) * FROM [TableName] ORDER BY [ColumnName]
and also there are not that many records(MAX 100 rows) kept in the table at the moment however, it will grow later.
The issue stems out from the ORDER BY [ColumnName] part of the syntax that changes the TOP selection order which makes the query to run very slow as I have also analyzed in the SQL SERVER QUERY ANALYZER.
Anyhow, I need to have the ORDER BY statement to show the data based on different columns either ascending or descending.
There might we workarounds to achieve the same goal that I am not aware of.
Any thoughts is appreciated.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 5, 2006
I am running a Stored procedure which select from a table and returns approx 800000 records. When calling from any client machine it takes long time to return the result (90 sec). It waits for ASYNC_NETWORK_IO which is pushing the result to client. If select statement is used with TOP operator to return less number of records it executes faster. When calling from the server the stored proc returns data in 13 sec with all records. In another machine of identical HW and configuration this problem is not there. Can anyone help how to improve ASYNC_NETWORK_IO issue?
Environment
SQL-2005 SP1 64 bit Standard on Active/Passive cluster
Windows -2003 Ent.
Thanks
-Ashis
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 6, 2005
Hi,
We are having SQL2000 Advance Server.
4 processor with hypherthreading, Memory 4 GB and it is a high transactional OLTP server. We are also running Transaction Replication on that server.
We recently bought Double Take and implemented on the server with File Difference with block check sum option for Disaster Recovery Purpose.
The Queue and the Log file folder is on local drive where the system doesn't use that folder except double take.
We are replicating from Source to Taget thru the WAN (DS3).We are replicating approx. 200 Gig of Data but just the difference.
Now the CPU usage is normal,Memory utilization is normal, but the network is a major problem as the Applications connecting to the Server timesout and the applications running very slow.
We have set just like the Tech support recommended.
I would appreciate, if someone give us some recommendations to run the double take without any problem.
Thanks in advance.
Anu
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 7, 2004
The following basic UPDATE SQL statement has been running for 16 hours and counting. I need to get this done ASAP.
UPDATE Recipients SET UndeliverableTime = getdate()
FROM Recipients
INNER JOIN Domains ON (Recipients.DomainID = Domains.ID)
INNER JOIN Undeliverables ON (
Recipients.UserName + '@' + Domains.Domain =
Undeliverables.EmailAddress)
Is there any way I can see how far this has gone and how long it will take to finish? Will this take another hour to finish or another week?
Both tables (Recipients and Undeliverables) have approximately 80 million records
I did a nearly identical operation with another table that had only 7 million records and it took 10.5 hours. I hope this doesn't scale linearly to 115 hours.
I am tempted to cancel, retune, and rerun but that may be trigger a really expensive rollback operation that could take days. Any ideas?
thanks!
View 14 Replies
View Related
