Need Advice On SQL Server Account To Use For My ASP.NET Application

Jun 23, 2004

Hi,





I know it's bad to use the built-in SA account to access SQL Server from my ASP.NET application.





I did some reading but would like some suggestions as well. One article I read talked about Application roles in SQL Server. Is this the best way to handle SQL Server access for read/write/update/delete privileges from an ASP.NET application?





If this is the way to go, how do I set it up? Can anyone suggest a good web site to read up on this?

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Application Performance Advice Please?

Jul 20, 2005

Hello all,I've been recruited to assist in diagnosing and fixing a performance problemon an application we have running on SQL Server 7.The application itself is third party software, so we can't get at thesource code. It's a Client Management system, where consultants all overthecountry track their client meetings, results, action plans, etc. , and hasapparently been problematic for a long time now. I came into thisinvestigationin mid-stream, but here's the situation as I understand it:We have users reporting it's slow, with no discernable pattern with respectto what part of the application they're using or now particular time of day.I am told that it doesn't appear to be a bandwith or computer resourceproblem. They apparently added two app servers a year or so ago, whichtemporarilyimproved the performance. We're using a nominal percentage of CPU andmemory.There are three large tables (approx 8 million rows) that are queried often,as users click to see their calendar of appointments or review past meetingswith a client, etc. The activity on these tables is over 90% reads(SELECTS) with about 10% INSERTS/UPDATES. We have attempted to run the IndexAnalyzer Wizard twicebut so far it just seems to hang (it could be that the workload file is toobig?) . So, what we're doing now is isolating the SELECT statements thattake a long time to run and manually comparing them to the indexes thatexist on these large tables. Since we can't alter the SQL source code,we're trying to alter the indexes to improve performance.What I would like to know is, is there a good way to get benchmarkmeasurements so we can explicitly measure any performance changes? Also, doyou thinkwe're going about this the right way, or is there some other avenue we couldbe looking at to improve performance?I recognize that performance questions are tricky to post/answer in anewsgroup, because usually you need more information than is provided. Theproblem isthat this is a high profile investigation (they're hauling us into meetingsevery two days to report our progress) and I need to be able to convincinglystate that we have either improved performance by X% , or that it is theapplication itself that's the problem and we're stuck with it.Any thoughts would be deeply appreciated.Thanks and best regards,Steve

View 5 Replies View Related

General Advice - Timesheet Application

Feb 2, 2004

So I have been tasked with converting a pilot timesheet application (written in Access) into an all singing all dancing web app. I'm planning on using SQL Server to provide some scale but wondered if anyone had any advice about processing time calcs.

I can of course use the smalldatetime datatype to store all the start at, finish at and elapsed hours times but wonderd if there was any comparative advantage to using numerics instead and converting to/from HH:MM representation.

Maybe I need to finally figure out how to create and use custom data types?

There's lots of math to do on these things once the data is captured for reporting and such and smalldattime looks like a fairly big waste of space for something that really only deals in hours.

Anyone doen things like this before? Any advice on what not to do?

many thanks

Steve

View 1 Replies View Related

Front/backend Access Application-----conversion To MSSQL--advice

Dec 16, 2005

I have an application that uses Acces as a backend and VBA as front end. Application is secured and is supplied on a CD with setup.exe.

Can I use VB 2005 and MS SQL to achieve the same?

Would I be able to package my application with  all the neccessery files (assuming that client does not have any e.g. SQL server) so that multiple front ends can access data from common source?

Would I be able to secure such an application using only VS 2005?

What would I need to quickly learn  how to achieve the above ( any books you can suggest maybe)?

View 1 Replies View Related

Sa Account And Hard Coded Application

Mar 27, 2001

Hello I was hoping somebody out there could help me …..

We have a hard-coded application which uses the Sa account with no password. We want to add password to Sa – but when we do get users/DBAs calling us saying the application does not work.

How can we add password to Sa and get the application to work - unfortunately we do not have scripts for the application or know of the whereabouts of the developers.

Any suggestions/ideas – will be greatly appreciated

Cheers

Khalid

View 2 Replies View Related

What Persmissions To Give To The Application Account To The Certificate

Aug 14, 2006

Hey guys. I've an application which uses an account named Uaccount1. I've given it db_datareader and db_datawriter permissions to the tables. I've given it execute permissions to all sp's I've given it reference permissions to the symmetric key. And I gave it reference permissions on the certificate. At this point, it can't see the certificate. If I give control permission to the account for the certificate, it works perfect. Is it necessary to do that or am I missing something. Our security is based on symmetric key and certificates...



Thank you

Tej.

View 6 Replies View Related

SA Account (DBA System Account) Granting Priveleges But SQL Server 2000 Not Applying Them

Dec 4, 2006

I have been running a script in SQL Server 2000 as sa also as a Active Directory user who has administrator rights (I tested both approaches SQL Server then Windows Authentication) in Query Analyser which grants execute rights to the stored procedures within the database instance and Query Analyser does not give any errors when I run the script. I have made sure that each transaction has a go after it. I then return to Enterprise Manager, check the rights (I apply them to roles so that when we create another SQL Server user we just grant him/her rights to the role) and discover that the role has not been granted the rights. I seems to be occurring only with 2 of the procedures. Is there a known bug that might be causing this?

yours sincerely

Craig Hoy

View 9 Replies View Related

Whether To Use Local System Account Or Domain Account For Service Account

Jan 5, 2006

During install of SQL Server 2005, we can of course use a domain account or the built-in system account for running the services.  I lean toward domain for obvious reaons but would like to know a +/- to each option and why I'd choose one over the other and what consequences or limitations one may encounter if I choose one over the other.

View 6 Replies View Related

DTS Fails As A Job With Service Startup Account As "System Account"

May 9, 2002

I have several DTS jobs that runs well as a job with my nt login account for the SQL agent service startup account, but if I use the System account
they fail with this error.
" Error opening datafile: Access is denied. Error source: Microsoft Data Transformation Services Flat File Rowset Provider"

The data has change access to the System account under the NT security.

Thank you in advanced.

Jorge

View 2 Replies View Related

Xp_cmdshell Does Not Execute For Non-sysadmin Account Even With Proxy Account

Mar 2, 2004

Hi all, i hope you can help me.

Basically a dts package has been setup that pulls in data from another companies server, this data requires to be on-demand i.e individual users can pull in updates of the data when they require it.

I am using xp_cmdshell and dtsrun to pull in the data. This obviouly works fine for me as i am a member of sysadmin.

Books online quotes " SQL Server Agent proxy accounts allow SQL Server users who do not belong to the sysadmin fixed server role to execute xp_cmdshell"

So i went to the SQL Server Agent Properties 'Job System' tab and unchecked 'Non-sysadmin job step proxy account' and entered a proxy account.

The proxy account has been setup as a Windows user with local administrator privilages and even a member of the sysadmin server role - just in case.

Now when i log onto the db with my test account - a non-sysadmin - and attempt to run the stored proc to import the data i recieved the message 'EXECUTE permission denied on object 'xp_cmdshell', database 'master', owner 'dbo' '

hmm... so basically i have either misunderstood BoL or there is something not quite right in my setup.

I have search the net for a few days now and yet i can find no solution.

Can anyone help?

View 2 Replies View Related

Domain Account Vs Local Account For SQLServerAgent

Jul 20, 2005

Hi there,BOL notes that in order for replication agents to run properly, theSQLServerAgent must run as a domain account which has privledges to loginto the other machines involved in replication (under "SecurityConsiderations" and elsewhere). This makes sense; however, I waswondering if there were any repercussions to using duplicate localaccounts to establish replication where a domain was not available.Anotherwords, create a local windows account "johndoe" on both machines(with the same password), grant that account access to SQL Server onboth machines, and then have SQL Server Agent run as "johndoe" on bothmachines. I do not feel this is an ideal solution but I havecircumstances under which I may not have a domain available; mypreliminary tests seem to work.Also, are there any similar considerations regarding the MSSQLSERVERservice, or can I always leave that as local system?Dave

View 1 Replies View Related

Which SQL Server Do I Use..Please Advice...

Feb 6, 2007

Hi,


I am currently creating an application that requires the use of Pocket
PC/PDA. The same application that runs on the desktop is to be run on
the mobile device metioned above. I am confused as to which of the
following combination servers i should use.


Option1)
Desktop - SQL Server Express Edition (Multi-user)
Mobile Device - SQL Sever Compact Edition


OR


Option 2)
Desktop - SQL Sever Compact Edition
Mobile Device - SQL Sever Compact Edition


To my understanding, if I use SQL Server Compact Edition on both my
desktop and mobile device, when i need to synchronise, the entire
database from the mobile device is copied over to the desktop and vice-
versa. However, I prefer only modified data to be synchornized. Can I
achieve it with the second option? Is it also possible with the first option? Please advice. Thank You


Regards,

View 1 Replies View Related

Domain Account Without A SQL Login Account

Apr 25, 2007

I have a situation that I have discovered in our QA database that I need to resolve. When I looked at the Activity Monitor for our server, I discovered that a process is running under a domain user account for one of our .Net applications. The problem is that that domain user account has not been created as a SQL login account on the server. I am trying to figure out how someone can log in to the database server with a domain user account that has not been added to SQL Server as a login account.



Does anyone have any insight on this? I don't like the idea of someone being able to create domain account that can access the database without me granting them specific access.



- Larry

View 6 Replies View Related

Backing Up Advice For Sql Server 6.5

Feb 2, 1999

hi, I have total 45 GB of data in the following servers ( 40 GB in sql server 6.5, 5GB in ftp server). both servers are in one machine(server). I want to make sure that I am doing the right thing for backup. The machine is not connected to a Lan. What is the best way to insure that my data are backed up safely?
what I am thinking of doing is to back up the database to using sql tools in the menu bar, that will backup the data to the same machine in this directory:
c:mssqlackupDBname.DAT

I will do this for all database in the sql server. Am I save to do this... I am wondering what IF the machine in which both severs are in crashed. My backup effort will be lost too. right. so what is the best way to protect my data. Do I need to buy a tape backup so I can do what I am doing Plus back up the c:mssqlackupDBname.DAT to the tape backup... I would really appreciate any suggestion in choosing any media (software/ hardware)to back up my data.

Thanks

Ali

View 4 Replies View Related

Server Hardware Advice

Aug 20, 2004

I'm looking to purchase new server hardware that will host my corporate intranet and a sql server instance. In most cases I can't see this server being hit by more than 20 or 30 users but I want it to be quick. I'm planning on running Server 2003 with sql server 2k and the intranet on IIS.

What I'm not sure about is the single vs dual processor and the RAM. How valuable is the dual proc? And the RAM, I plan on 1.5 GB but I wonder what the benefits are beyond that.

Perhaps with this many users it doesn't make that much difference but I can see adding more load.

Does anyone have any recommendations?

View 3 Replies View Related

Moving SQL Server DB's - Need Advice.

Mar 31, 2008

I've got a situation where I need to regularly (maybe each month), detach a DB, copy its files from their highspeed SAN location to a slower NAS, then re-attach it and make it available on-line. We're doing this for our DB's as they age to > 3 years.

Just wondering if any of you have scripts you can point me to so I don't have to re-invent the wheel.

Also, after you re-attach, how do you verify the NAS DB is 100% ok before deleting the original from its SAN location?

Any help/advice is appreciated.

Thanks,

Isaac

View 9 Replies View Related

Sql Server Upgrade Advice

Aug 23, 2007

Hi

We currently have a Server:
Dual Intel Xeon 3.0 GHz
4 GB ram
(C) 2x18 GB SCSI disks RAID 1 for OS
(D) 4x72 GB SCSI disks RAID 5 for Data

The server is running:
Windows 2003 + IIS (Single web application)
Tomcat (Single web application) (Is about to be outfased)
MS SQL 2005 (In simple recovery mode)

The C-driver is currently only used for OS and applications
The D-driver is holding all data + SQL Data files and SQL Transaction files...
E.g.
- SQL Data files = 7 GB
- SQL Transaction files = 20 GB
- Image liberary = 100 GB
- Other = 15 GB

The IIS uses around 768 MB ram for cashing and execution of the web application
The Tomcat uses around 350 MB ram
The SQL is the to use a max of 2.2 GB ram (and 1024 MB pr. query)
(Leaving around 512 MB ram left)

There is only one database installed on the SQL, but it is very large (+15 mill records)
We are currently doing Free-Text searches in one table (~3.5 mill records), and it is to slow.

So the question is what is the best way to gain performance...
- Increase to 8 GB ram?
- Purchase a new server as webserver, so the curr. server can be dedicated as SQL?
- Attach a NAS to split the SQL files into several groups, and seperate transaction logs from data?
(6 disks are max in curr. server)

Economy has to be considered :)

Thanx!

View 7 Replies View Related

Advice Needed On Best Way To Set Up SQL Server

Jan 10, 2008

Hi,

I'm hoping somebody can help me here as i'm struggling to find any information elsewhere on the net. We have recently purchased a new server, the rough specs are:

2 X Quad-Core Xeon E7320 2.13GHz 4Mb Cache
32Gb PC2-5300 DDR II RAM

We are planning to install the 64 Bit version of SQL Server 2005. We want to use the server for a number of purposes.


Building and weekly processing of 2 complex data marts (approx size is 1Tb each)

Processing and querying of 2 Analysis Services databases that will be built from these data marts. These will be queried by no more than about 15 users (no more than about 5 simultaneously).

Relational querying of the data marts themselves (same users as above)
My problem is that I am not sure of the best way to configure SQL Server. Should I use 2 separate instances? How should the processors/memory be shared between SQL Server/Analysis Services? My main priority is the performance of the OLAP querying. However, I also want the weekly processing and any ad-hoc SQL querys run against the marts to be efficient.


Any advice would be very much appreciated.

Kind Regards,

David.

View 1 Replies View Related

With Nolock In Sql Server Please Advice

Jan 27, 2008



I have read lots of article about with nolock, and have seen many projects using with nolock option.
Please advice me if i am right.

1.Normal select queries can use with no lock
2. Batch jobs should not use with no lock.


please guide me, am i right.

Thanks

View 6 Replies View Related

Server Configuration Advice Requested

Jul 20, 2005

I'm looking for configuration advice for a SQL Server. I have thefollowing hardware to work with:1 Dell P4 2.66 GHz PC with 512 MB RAM and a 40GB IDE drive2 Seagtate Barracuda 4.55GB SCSI drives (ST34572W) in an external bay1 Adaptec 2940UW SCSI ControllerWindows 2000 Advanced ServerMSSQL 2000 EnterpriseThe PC will strictly be a SQL Server only - no IIS or FTP or otherservices. It will host about 8-10 databases that service a departmentof 300 people. My plan is to install W2K and MSSQL on the PC's IDEhard drive and configure the identical SCSI Barracudas as a mirroredvolume to host the databases (MDF/LDFs).Will there be any performance problems installing MSSQL Server on theIDE drive while the MDF/LDFs are on the SCSI drives? From aperformance standpoint, would I be better off installing MSSQL Serveron the SCSI drives?

View 1 Replies View Related

Sql Server Setup Advice Sought

Jan 4, 2008

Hi there,

I've been using Sql Server for my development for perhaps two years. My systems have experienced crashes, I switched from XP to Vista, it crashed again because of malware, etc. In short I have installed and reinstalled the Sql Server Express quite a few times. In the meantime my databases have been growing. So far I've had my development only on one desktop but now I am expecting a new DELL Dimention top of the line machine and I want to switch some of the development over there.

This is the scoop. I need to make numerous improvements in my databases to increase performance, sometimes you add a column or delete one from a table, etc. At the same time the data is being collected. I want to have my Sql DBs set up on one machine and be able to work on another and grab the data, etc. In other words I want to start doing some networking which so far I've done only on a limited basis just for file transfer and printing.

I have no clear image as to how it should be arranged. If I leave my Sql Server DBs on one machine and start using them on another one, do I have to have a new client set up?

Perhaps I need to have another instance set up also or is it the same?

In one of the prior installation which is now in my WIndows.old folder I have 3 Sql Server instance folders: MSSQL1, MSSQL2, MSSQL3. for some reason in this latest installation I got only one folder: MSSQL1. Shall I copy two other folders (MSSQL2 and MSSQL3) from Windows.old to this new Program FilesMicrosoft Sql Server 2005 folder or not?

Two of my machines that will access the databases will be at my office connected via a 10/100/1000 switch but the third one will be home. It will be connected via Vista Computer Name service (Telnet I presume) and I have a high speed cable to the server.

This is the setup as clear as I can see it now. Depending on the answers I get I may come back with some more questions.

Many thanks.

View 2 Replies View Related

Need Advice On Installation Of Server 2005

May 23, 2008

The box that was provided for me to install sql server 2005 (64 bit) standard is setup like this:

c: raid 1 (OS is server 2003 x 64)
d: raid 5 (4 disk)
and 1 extra drive.
What is the best install solution for this configuration

Would it be best to put Sql Server 2005 on the extra drive and the mdf and ldf on the raid 5. Im not to sure.

Box is made, and I know ideally would be to place the ldf and mdf on there own Raid 10. This is for a ecommerce site.'

Thanks

View 3 Replies View Related

Moving A SQL Server 2000 Database From One Server To Another Advice

May 23, 2006

Hi, i was after some advice on moving a SQL Server 2000 database from one server to another.

Usually i would do this by backing up the database on the original server the copying it accross the LAN to the new server and restoring it there. This database is 10Gb in size and copying it accross the LAN will take some time and i would like to minimise downtime if possible. The database is at a customer site where i am not responsible for the network or Hardware.

Thanks in advance for your help

Nick

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2005 Authorization Advice && Configuration

Mar 20, 2007

Does anyone have a good starter's tutorial on authorization advice & configuration for SQL Server 2005?I need to know what is adviced what web users can specifically do and dont in my db, and how to configure that...Thanks!

View 1 Replies View Related

Need Advice: One SQL Server 2000, One Web App, Multiple Clients With Their Own Data

Feb 29, 2008

Hello,I'm looking into offering a custom data driven web app that I wrote for an organization that I'm apart of to other similar organizations. I would be hosting the data and web application code on my dedicated server. This application is using the membership api supplied in .NET 2.0 and also has my own custom data tables within it.My question is what would be the best way to add clients to this? Should I simply create a new database for each new client like so: ACME_Database, ABC_Database, AAA_Database etc. Or should I add some sort of client "Tag" (tag meaning column within each datatable) to these databases and then update my SQL queries to process them accordingly. I imagine I could do both but I guess I need some advice from people that already had experiance with providing this kind of service. Thanks!Jason 

View 4 Replies View Related

Advice On Middleware Products For TRUE Scaling Out Of SQL Server

Apr 14, 2006

We have a 3 month old quad processor/dual core server running SQLServer 2005 and already it is getting close to hitting the CPU wall.An 8 way CPU box is prohibitively expensive and out of the question. Iam looking desperately for a way to TRULY scale out SQL server...in thesame way that IIS can be scaled out via App Center.The "in the box" solution for SQL Server 2005 scaling out is the DMV.Unfortunately this solution makes the system less available rather thanmore (one server outage takes them all out for that table) and requiresserious rearchitecting of the software to use. Contrast this to IISand AppCenter where each added server makes the system more available,and requires no rearchitecting to work.Before someone says "what you want can't be done in adatabase"...Oracle has an application server middleware product thatlets you do both of the above. Just plug a new server with Oracle onit, and you've doubled your capacity. But SQL Server 2005 doesn't yethave a similar capability.So I read with great interest the following article that talks aboutwhy this is the case with SQL Server. There are two issues that makeit very difficult to do:http://www.sql-server-performance.c...ability_availab...You can create a crude pool using replication, but the performancetimes look horrendous.However, the article also talks about the latest developments in thisfield...specifically MIDDLEWARE that can create a scale out solutionthat is more available and that requires simply adding new servers toscale up.I found two companies which seem to offer this new capability:http://www.metaverse.cc/newsevents.asp?cid=17999andhttp://www.pcticorp.com/product.aspxBoth companies appear to have patents or a patent pending on theprocess. I tried to contact metaverse but got no reply, despite theirrecent press release. I just emailed Pcticorp today to see if I couldlearn more about their product.My question for this group is:Does anyone have experience with either of the two products (or anyothers that provide this capability)?Many thanks in advance for your help.Ian Ippolitohttp://www.rentacoder.com

View 17 Replies View Related

SQL SERVER ACCOUNT

Feb 20, 2008

How can I find out what account sql server is running under?

View 2 Replies View Related

General Advice Needed Regarding MS Access, MS SQL Server, MySQL/PostgreSQL

Nov 15, 2006

I am working on two versions of an application, one of which will be awindows forms application (which will need to be redistributable) andthe other will be a web application.I have MS Visual Studio 2005 (along with the developer's edition of MSSQL Server), but not MS Access. I also have MySQL, PostgreSQL, Sun'sapplication server, Tomcat and Apache web server. I am working onWindows XP Pro, and have installed the .NET 3 SDK and all relevantrelated products I could find (e.g. 2 extensions packages for VisualStudio).I have one MS Access database, to which my users should have read onlyaccess. I have, and have used, a tool for importing MS Accessdatabases into MySQL. I expect that SQL Server has a similar utilityhidden somewhere (where I haven't yet looked, though I HAVE beenlooking - obviously in the wrong places). I have located a similarutility for importing MS Access databases into PostgreSQL. I have notyet decided which servers to use for the web version, but that isanother story, for which I may raise another thread in due course (butI welcome suggestions which may reduce the effort required givenrequired effort for the windows forms app).My problem is for the windows form aplication (intended for use by asingle family). I expect to use ADO.NET. The question is, should Iimport the Access database into MS SQL, and redistribute it, along withMS SQL Server Express (or is that necessary), or distribute it just asan Access database and use the jet engine to access it. A relatedquestion is, "Does ADO.NET support creating new databases for a givenengine?" Imagine a recipe database. It is easy enough to create a SQLscript that creates all the required tables, indices, foreign keys,&c., but can I submit that SQL script to an ADO.NET object, along witha file name, and have it create, e.g., an Access database with thesupplied name. Or do I have to create a database file with nothing init other than the schema?I have more questions, but they'll have to wait.ThanksTed

View 5 Replies View Related

Install Of SQL Server 2000 Dev Edition Over MSDE. Any Advice Appreciated.

Jul 20, 2005

It's arriving from ebuyer tomorrow for 32 quid. I already have aninstance of MSDE running on the laptop and ideally i would like SQLserver to be installed and use the current instance and not installany other additional services. [hope i got my terminology correcthere.] Basically all i would like is to use the Enterprise Managerwith my existing MSDE database. I was wondering if there is anything ishould be doing before I install. Should i shut down the service orleave it running for instance.Thanks for any tips,AndyB

View 2 Replies View Related

Advice On SQL Server 2005 Vs. Express Edition W/ Advanced Services

Apr 24, 2006

I've been using SQL Server 2005 Std. for my development work on a laptop w/ 2 GHz Celeron and 768 Mb RAM. Now that Express Edition has Reporting Services and Full-Text Search, would I be wise to just use it instead? I actually have both on my machine since Express Edition installed with VS 2005 Standard. Also, if I uninstall SQL Server 2005 Std. what will I lose? Thanks in advance.

-Mike

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2005 Reporting - Books / Reference Guides, Etc, Need Advice!!!

Apr 18, 2008



I am not new to the SQL Server world, but am somewhat new to the SQL Server 2005 world. I am just getting into the reporting tool. By just messing around for about an hour or so, I was able to get what I wanted somewhat. Basically, I'd like to get up to speed on the reporting side of things fairly quickly. So I am looking at some books, and was wondering if anyone had any suggestions on any.

Here is a few that caught my eye:

-MS SQL Server 2005 Reporting Services by Brian Larson
-MS SQL Server 2005 Reporting Services for Dummies
-Professional SQL Server 2005 Reporting Services by Paul Turley
-The Rational Guide to SQL Server Reporting Services

I am thinking the 1st two would probably be my best bet, but wanted to get you folks suggestions.

Let me know as soon as you can as I am planning on going to the book store tonight or this weekend.

Thanks in Advance!!!


Tony

View 2 Replies View Related

SQL Security :: What Windows Account Used Server Login To Access Server

May 14, 2015

If we have a "pool" SQL login, a one that uses SQL Server authentication, and this login is used by different domain account to access SQL Server, is there a way to audit which domain account used that "pool" login to do something on a object in SQL Server? I have to keep this way of accessing SQL Server, so how to create a login for every domain account accesses SQL Server

View 7 Replies View Related

I Need To Make A Minor Change To A SQL Server Script That Is In Production. Need Advice So I Don't Screw Something Up.

Mar 1, 2007

Hello. I am not very strong with SQL server. But I know enough to get my way around. The reason I am asking forhelp is that I need to change a SQL server script that resides on one of the production database servers of thecompany I work for. I just need to add two new lines to the stored procedure.(See the lines that are bolded.) Thesevalues are [MO_FAX],[MO_EMAIL].
Can someone tell me if there is a best way of going about doing this? Can I just simply open up SQL server and quickly make the change? The big issue here is that this script is used in production. So I am just a little worriedabout screwing something up. Anyway, I would appreciate some good advice on this?
 
 
/* Returns all data given the region and country */ALTER  PROCEDURE [dbo].[GetAllInfomration]
AS SELECT   [COUNTRY],  [Company_NAME],   [CompanyAddress],   [CompanyPhone],
  [MO_FAX]  [MO_EMAIL]
  [CompanyFax],
 FROM [InfoLookup].[dbo].[Company_Contact]  RETURN

View 5 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved