Newbie To The Server Side - Connection String Question
Nov 25, 2006
Hi -
I am an SQL user from the development side, this is the first time I have been tasked to set up SQL Server. So far so good, although I'm having some issues finding the information I am normally familiar with to build a connection string to our database server.
1) We are on a dedicated server with a hosting company. They did not provide us with a licence for SQL Server 2005, so we had to install SQL Server 2005 Express. So far everything is going well, I have:
- gone through the proceedure to enable remote access to the database
- installed the Northwind test database
- installed msSQL Server Management Studio express, and I can see the db components.
I usually use Enterprise Manager to connect to and construct/manage my databases - however I am usually provided the connection string information.
- I have the database set to Windows Authentication Mode.
So my questions -
1. What is the connection string format to use (with .asp)? i usually use the following:
"Provider=SQLOLEDB;Data Source=DATABASEADDRESS;Database=DATABASENAME;User Id=USER;Password=PASSWORD;"
2. How do I find my server name? currently, in the database manager it shows as "WDC202SQLEXPRESS (SQL SERVER 9.0.2047 - WDC202USERNAME)" - where USERNAME is our current username. The system Databases and Northwind are listed below.
When i try to register using the above format connection string with Enterprise Manager, I get the connection not found or login. so my last question -
3. When i am setting up my connection string, should i be using the same user/pass set that logs me into the server - i am assuming this is the Windows Authentication credentials Ive set in the Server install.
Any help would be very much appreciated.
Thanks!
eric@thatsprettyhip.com
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 29, 2008
Hello friends....
my question is as follows:
How do I send the data from the server side to the client side specifically in what format and what kind of connection do I use?
waiting for answers.....
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 31, 2006
I have a Windows 2003 Server running IIS 6.0 and SQL Server 2005. I have just (Today) deployed the first ASP.NET application (developed in Visual Studio 2003 and, as such, dependent on .NET Framework 1.1) on this server and am getting HTTP Error 403 (You are not authorized to view this page). This ASP.NET application runs fine on another server that is configured with the OS=Windows Server 2003, IIS=6.0 but without SQL Server 2005 and without the .NET Framework version 2.0. I found in the IIS Application configuration (on the troublesome site) that my app (in the Default Web Site folder) was pointing to the version 2.0 aspnet_isapi.dll. All efforts to use aspnet_regiis to "re-align" my app with version 1.1 have been fruitless to eliminate the HTTP Error 403. I granted the NETWORK SERVICE account privledges to the wwwroot folder. At this point, I don't know if I have a Framework error or a privileges problem.
Please help.
Thanks,
Rob
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 6, 2007
I am trying to migrate from my current system, where I do merge replication from Windows Mobile devices running SQL Server CE 2.0 to a central database running SQL Server 2000 sp3a. I want eventually to move to a system running SQL Server 2005 CE replicating to a SQL Server 2005 back-end. But the transition will need to be gradual, and I may have to support both systems for a while until I can convert all clients from the old system to the new. I also need to do thorough testing.
So ... I'm trying to set up a test environment giving me the maximum possible flexibility to do my testing. Ideally, I'd like to set up SQL Server 2000 and SQL Server 2005 on a side-by-side basis, in a manner that would potentially allow mobile devices running both SQL Server CE 2.0 and SQL Server 2005 CE to sync with either back-end server.
Can someone provide me with guidance as what is possible to set up here? I know that SQL Server 2000 and 2005 can be installed side-by-side on the same server. It also appears that you can set up SQL Server 2000 so that EITHER SQL Server CE 2.0 OR SQL Server 2005 CE can sync with SQL Server 2000 (see www.microsoft.com/sql/editions/sqlmobile/connectivity-tools.mspx), but I don't know if it's possible for BOTH SQL Server CE 2.0 AND SQL Server 2005 CE to sync to the same SQL Server 2000. As for SQL Server 2005 ... it appears to be possible to set up SQL Server 2005 so that BOTH SQL Server CE 2.0 devices AND SQL Server 2005 CE devices can sync to the same SQL Server 2005 (see web page cited above). However, I don't know if it's possible to set up a SQL Server 2005 server installation in this manner while at the same time having a side-by-side SQL Server 2000 installation supporting any level of mobile merge replication.
HELP!!!!
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2008
will this create a separate instance?
Is there anything I need to be aware of?
Thank you.
Greg
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 19, 2006
Is there anywhere I can compare side by side between 2005 SQL Server and 2005 SQL Server express Edition?
I just found out that the express version does not have the database Copy feature (When you right clink on the database object -> Tasks ) !
I don't know about the evel version since I have not install yet. Any idea ?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 8, 2004
Hi,
In Analysis Services there is an option to enforce a role either on the client side or the server side.
Can someone kindly guide what's the recommended approach and what's really the difference between the two options.
Thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2008
Hello!
I was wondering if I can install/run SQL 2008 and 2005 side by side with SQL 2005 being default instance. Any issues with that?
Thanks,
Igor
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 15, 2007
having installed 2005 first and installed 2000 with both types of reports going to one 2005 home. i would like to have separate homes
with reports going their respective homes. Do i have to first unstall
2005 and do a new installation with a different report and server than
2000. I would like to avoid this and just fine tune 2000 with the rsconfig.exe. Help me out please.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2006
Hai
My system is already installed with SQL server 2000 . Is it possible for me to install SQL server 2005 BETA CTP in the same machine and run both side by side.
Regards
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 14, 2005
I have SQL Express installed on my desktop and want to install SQL Server Evaluation.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 8, 2006
Hi all,
Is it possible to run SQL Server 2005 Dev Ed. and the Express edition side by side on my development platform?
Thanks,
Andy
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2006
I have one standby server that I use for multiple production DB SQL Server 2000 servers. We are upgrading one of the production SQL Servers to 2005. I will install 2005 on my standby and run 2000 and 2005 side by side.
Is this okay? Are there any caveats specific to running 2000 and 2005 on the same standby server?
Thanks!
JL
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2006
I plan to upgrade my server to SQL 2005. It is a rather old machine, but still ok with the recommended hardware requirements.
It runs Windows 2000 (SBS) server, which is also a PDC, DHCP, DNS, Exchange server (I stop here but the list is long), with SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition (one single named instance). Everything localized (Italian).
I upgraded the database in a development machine and it works perfectly.
I installed SQL 2005 Standard Edition (English locale) on the server (default instance, MSSQLSERVER), and I have run in a lot of troubles.
The problem seems to reside in the TCPIP network protocols. If I enable TCPIP in the 2005 Server Configuration Manager, the new instance (MSSQLSERVER) does not start (this prevented me from upgrading to SP1 until I realized the cause, disabled TCPIP protocol and was finally able to update).
If I understand correctly, the problem is that both instances, the old 2000 one and the new one, try to listen to 1433 port. I changed manually the port to 1434 in the Server Configuration Manager. The result is that both SQL servers work, but none is working ok. I have several applications accessing the server. The asp application works. The .NET aspx one doesn't.
A tipical error I get is:
Codice evento: 3005
Messaggio evento: Eccezione non gestita. (Unhandled exception)
Ora evento: 04/05/2006 13.42.26
Ora evento (UTC): 04/05/2006 11.42.26
ID evento: 7c2749235b7d4c578591871217f74046
Sequenza evento: 175
Occorrenza evento: 24
Codice dettagli evento: 0
Informazioni applicazione:
Dominio applicazione: /LM/W3SVC/1/Root/intranet-1-127912101551093750
Livello di attendibilità : Full
Percorso virtuale applicazione: /intranet
Percorso applicazione: F:Inetpubwwwrootintranet
Nome computer: IQ
Informazioni processo:
ID processo: 684
Nome processo: aspnet_wp.exe
Nome account: mycompanyIWAM_IQ
Informazioni eccezione:
Tipo di eccezione: SqlException
Messaggio eccezione: Login failed for user 'mycompanystefania'.
Informazioni richiesta:
URL richiesta: http://intranet/intranet/articoli/venditeProd.aspx?Codice=SOL T1
Percorso richiesta: /intranet/articoli/venditeProd.aspx
Indirizzo host utente: 10.0.0.127
Utente: mycompanystefania
Autenticazione: True
Tipo di autenticazione: NTLM
Nome account thread: mycompanyIWAM_IQ
Informazioni thread:
ID thread: 1
Nome account thread: mycompanyIWAM_IQ
Rappresentazione: True
Analisi dello stack: in System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection)
in System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj)
in System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj)
in System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.CompleteLogin(Boolean enlistOK)
in System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.OpenLoginEnlist(SqlConnection owningObject, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance)
in System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds..ctor(DbConnectionPoolIdentity identity, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, Object providerInfo, String newPassword, SqlConnection owningObject, Boolean redirectedUserInstance)
in System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionFactory.CreateConnection(DbConnectionOptions options, Object poolGroupProviderInfo, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnection owningConnection)
in System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.CreatePooledConnection(DbConnection owningConnection, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnectionOptions options)
in System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.CreateObject(DbConnection owningObject)
in System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.UserCreateRequest(DbConnection owningObject)
in System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.GetConnection(DbConnection owningObject)
in System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection)
in System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory)
in System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open()
in intranet.Global.Session_Start(Object sender, EventArgs e)
in System.Web.SessionState.SessionStateModule.RaiseOnStart(EventArgs e)
in System.Web.SessionState.SessionStateModule.CompleteAcquireState()
in System.Web.SessionState.SessionStateModule.BeginAcquireState(Object source, EventArgs e, AsyncCallback cb, Object extraData)
in System.Web.HttpApplication.AsyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute()
in System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously)
I also tried to use named pipes on the 2005, but I was unable to access the SQL 2005 server instance from a network computer running the Management Studio. I need to have the new SQL server working besides the old one, for a short period, to evaluate in the production environment if the legacy hardware is actually ok to support it. Any ideas?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2006
I'm rather new at working with SQL Server. I've installed 2005 onto my PC and I have 7.0 already. What I want to know is how do I import my packages from 7.0 into 2005?
Any help would be appreciated.
Thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2006
Hi!
It is possibile to install SQL Server Compact Edition side-by-side on the same machine where SQL Server 2005 is already installed?
Thanks, Marco.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 12, 2007
Background information:
I have been researching BOL, this forum, and the SQL Server help: Working with Multiple versions installation documents since yesterday. We have an AMD x64 multi-processor IBM server running SQL Server 2000 under MS Windows 2003 Enterprise SP1. SQL Server is installed in the "c:program files (x86)" folder. I wanted to verify that we were indeed running the 32-bit version of SQL Server 2000 so I also ran the @@version command from isql and it returns:
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2162 (Intel X86)
Goal:
We need to install SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition 64-bit in a side by side installation. We will be migrating the SQL 2000 x32 stuff over to SQL 2005 x64 at a later date. My research shows I should be able to do this without any issues.
Have I missed anything or does it look like I am ready to move forward?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 29, 2006
I am planning on installing SQL Server 2005 first and then install SQL Server 2000 as a separate instance on the same server. Has anyone had any experience with this setup? When I ran the SQL 2000 set up it didn't force me to create a new instance but I still did. I also installed the files on different directories c:program files just in case. If you have any experience of ideas about this configuration, please let us know. Thanks.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2007
I have SQL Express 2005 with Advanced Services on a development box that I also want to have installed side-by-side with SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition so I can develop apps using either edition based on the features I need (or don't need). From what I understand from sifting through other posts is that side-by-side installs of these two editions is supported and I should setup a named instance for each edition (SQLEXPRESS for the express edition and MSSQLSERVER for the standard edition). Is this setup accurate or is there another/better way?
Also, does anybody know if side-by-side installations of Reporting Services is also supported? If I install SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition with Reporting Services, will there be two different report servers running in IIS? Since there are different features in Reporting Services between the two editions, I'm not sure how side-by-side installations will effect one another.
Thanks in advance for any help,
Tony
View 10 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2015
I have a child package where the ConnectionString property of a Connection Manager is set by a Parent Package Variable Configuration. I set up a script task that brings up a message box with the value of the ConnectionString property right before the dataflow task.
MessageBox.Show(Dts.Connections["CPU_*"].ConnectionString.ToString());When I run the parent package, the message box shows that the connection string is changing with every iteration, but in the dataflow it always draws the data from the same source.
The connection manager is an ADO.Net type, RetainSameConnection is set to False, and I've been researching this for days.
(Update 2/23/2015): To make this stranger, when I look at the diagnostic logs, they tell me that when the new connections are being opened they are using the new connection strings.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2008
Hi all, mister
I want create a function but I get this error: Error Invalid use of side-effecting or time-dependent operator in 'EXECUTE STRING' within a function
I think in a function, cannot use temp tables, or calling exec or store procedures.
Which is the best solution for my issue ? develop store procedure ??
thanks.
CREATE FUNCTION fnObtenerTablaMaestra ()
RETURNS @T Table ( Descripcion VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL, CIF VARCHAR(8) NULL )
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @cmd nvarchar(max)
DECLARE @sql nvarchar(max)
DECLARE @nexoUNION NVARCHAR(max)
DECLARE @params nvarchar(max)
DECLARE @NombreTabla VARCHAR(MAX)
DECLARE @Descripcion VARCHAR(MAX)
DECLARE @CIF VARCHAR(MAX)
-- Cannot access temporary tables from within a function.
-- IF EXISTS (SELECT TABLE_NAME FROM tempdb.INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES WHERE TABLE_NAME LIKE '#tmpTable%')
-- DROP TABLE #tmpTable
-- CREATE TABLE #tmpTable ( Descripcion VARCHAR(20) NOT NULL, CIF VARCHAR(8) NULL )
SET @nexoUNION = NULL
DECLARE c1 CURSOR for
SELECT [CD_NOMBRE_TABLA], [DS_CAMPO_DESCRIPCION], [DS_CAMPO_CIF] FROM [TABLA_MAESTRA]
OPEN c1
FETCH c1 INTO @NombreTabla, @Descripcion, @CIF
--FETCH NEXT FROM c1 INTO @NombreTabla, @Descripcion, @CIF
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS >= 0
--WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS = 0
BEGIN
SELECT @sql =
'INSERT INTO #tmpTable
N'''+ @NombreTabla + '''
N'''+ @Descripcion + '''
N'''+ @CIF + ''''
SELECT @sql =
'SELECT ' + @Descripcion + ', '+ @CIF + ' FROM ' + @NombreTabla
IF @nexoUNION IS NULL
BEGIN
SET @nexoUNION = 'UNION'
END
ELSE
SET @sql = @nexoUNION + ' ' + @sql
-- EXECUTE (@sql)
--Exec(@sql)
FETCH c1 INTO @NombreTabla, @Descripcion, @CIF
--FETCH NEXT FROM c1 INTO @NombreTabla, @Descripcion, @CIF
END
CLOSE c1
DEALLOCATE c1
--SET @sql = 'SELECT Descripcion, CIF FROM #tmpTable'
-- Error Invalid use of side-effecting or time-dependent operator in 'EXECUTE STRING' within a function
EXECUTE(@sql)
RETURN
END
GO
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 24, 2014
I'm using SQL Server 2008 R2 BIDS to accomplish this.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2014
I will soon be embarking on an upgrade of a transaction replicated database (Push) from 2005 to 2012 SP2.The publisher, distributor and subscriber are 3 separate machines.There databases will be detached, MDF and LDF will be copied across. Once attached, replication will be set up from scratch.
The name of the new servers are NOT the same as the existing ones.Should I completely remove transaction replication user the wizard and unticking the DB from being a database for transactional replication or just stop the log reader agent?How can I make sure the last of the transactions have gone across before I detach?Should I detach the subscriber first or the publication? Does it even matter?
Is there a better way of moving across the databases? I for one would have preferred to backup (.bak) then restore on the other side. I'd love to hear opinions on this as well.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Nov 26, 2014
I am working to create a phone list that will contain Last Name, First Name, and Phone Number sorted by last name. For printing purposes I would like to have three columns of data instead of the standard of one column.
Is it possible to create a query to present data in three columns showing the data side by side?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2007
I have downloaded and installed VS C# Express Orcas beta 1. It appears that Express editons ov VS can only connect to SQL2005 Express and not to a high end edition which I have on my computer. In one of the Orcas forums, it was suggested that I can install SQL2005 Express side by side my high end SQL 2005. To play it safe, I wanted to get a confirmation from this forum before I do that. Is a side-by-side installation ok? thanks.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2006
If I download sql server 2005 express edition, will it run side by side with my sql server 2000, or is it a one or the other situation?
smtraber
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2015
would like to know if it's possible to install SQL Server Failover cluster instance with shared storage along with standalone installation with Always on ( always on uses WSFC underneath).
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2007
Hi people
Here is my case: I've a server running Windows server 2003 edition and SQL2000.
I've installed SQL2005 using the side-by-side method as described by MSFT docs. I've then copied the mdf & ldf files to new locations and attached the db in SQL 2005 management studio. Every thing fine. Next, I've migrated the DTSs using the DTS migration wizard. After this step I have some bad warnings in windows:
When I restart the server I get the following message: "mmc.exe Microsoft Management Console encountered a problem and needed to close".
Furthermore: I can't start the old SQL enterprise manager.
It shows another error "mmc.exe - Entry point Not Found" and closes it self.
The MSFT support page on this error relates it to Windows XP but my system is running Windows server....
Any one has any idea why this is happening?
Any suggested course of action?
Many thanks
ds9
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2015
When I try compare 2 years worth of data side by side. They go in separate grids. I know it is just a usability feature.
i would want see same month data for multiple years side by side.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2008
All,
I was trying to do something like puting two tables side-by-side inside a list, and list itself is grouped by a field.
But for some reason, two tables are not organzied pararally even there is no page break inserted.
Please help. Tks in advance.
Alex
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 9, 2008
Hi,
I need to migrate from sql 2000 to 2005 and in place upgrade is not possible. I can move the databases, logins but can some one help me to migrate sqlmaint plans and dts packages to 2005.
Thanks,
Rajakanna
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 22, 2007
We have some developers who manage SQL2000 servers from their WinXP workstations using Enterprise Manager. We have now rolled out our first SQL Server 2005.
Can we install the SQL2005 Management Studio side-by-side with Enterprise Manager on these WinXP workstations?
If not, what are most people doing in these cases?
Thanks!
Mike Hiland
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2006
I added a connection (ADO.NET) object by name testCon in the connection manager - I wanted to programmatically supply the connection string. So I used the "Expressions" property of the connection object and set the connectionstring to one DTS variable. The idea is to supply the connection string value to the variable - so that the connection object uses my connection string.
Then I added a "Backup Database Task" to my package with the name BkpTask. Now whenever I try to set the connection property of BkpTask to the testCon connection object, by typing testCon, it automatically gets cleared. I am not able to set the connection value.
Then after spending several hours I found that this is because I have customized the connection string in testCon. If I don't customize the connection string, I am able to enter the "testCon" value in the connection property of the BkpTask.
Is this an intrinsic issue?
View 2 Replies
View Related