OLE DB ARITHABORT Error With Indexed Computed Columns
Oct 31, 2002
Instead of using Full-Text indices, which I don't like to manage, we've tried to use seperate tables that contain recordID, the word, a count of the word in the parent field and computed column which is the CHECKSUM() of the word column. I indexed the checksum column with a clustered index.
Works great in Query Analyser. But when the ASP page calls it, I get this message:
Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server (0x80040E14)
INSERT failed because the following SET options have incorrect settings: 'ARITHABORT'.
Same for updates and deletes. The question is how should these SET settings be done? Any ideas would be greatly welcomed.
Thanks
Jason
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Nov 13, 2001
i have a table containing the column "current month" and "current day" as smallint which contains the number of months since 1900-01-01 and the day of this month. now i want to trnslate this column in a smalldatetime ( not datetime !) value using a computed column and then create an index on that column.
the formula should be:
dateadd(d,[current day]-1,
dateadd(m,[current month],convert(smalldatetime,'1900-01-01'))
)
trying to create an index on this column results in an error message saying
that the formula is nondeterministic or imprecise
removing the convert statement leaving only the date results in a column of type datetime and creating the index works fine
replacing convert(smalldatetime,'1900-01-01') with a column name which has the type smalldatetime also allows to create an index but thats not what i want to do.
it seems that sql2000 thinks a convert from a string to a date is nondeterministic. Is there any possibility to create a const of type smalldatetime without using convert?
Any idea?
(besides this, datediff(d,'yyyy-mm-dd',anydate) is nondeterministic but datediff(d,dateadd(d,0,'yyyy-mm-dd'),anydate) is deterministic. strange...)
and
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 4, 2007
Is it possible to get a Computed column in one table to carry out a SELECT & SUM from a column in another table? I have tried a SELECT / FROM / WHERE construct but SQL complains about that.
Regards
Clive
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 20, 2008
I am working with data that has a lot of records that get updated and inserted frequently, and to avoid having to create formulas through code all over the place, I am experimenting with computed column formulas. I have a question though.. It works well for any addition or subtraction (columnA+columnB), however, when I try to use division (columnA/columnB), it only returns integers, no decimals. I would like to have decimals, particularly with a specific scale and precision and I would really like to attempt this without any coding. Any suggestions?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2003
I have a table with fields called fname (First Name) and lname (Last Name). I need the userīs email thai is compose from lname and fname:
LOWER(LEFT (fname,1) + lname)
Is there any difference between creatig this computed column ia a table or in a view in SQL Server 2000?
I can do:
1. CREATE TABLE Users(
fname varchar(20),
lname varchar(20),
email as LOWER(LEFT (fname,1) + lname) )
Or
2. CREATE TABLE Users (
fname varchar(20),
lname varchar(20))
CREATE VIEW Vw_users (fname, Lname ,
email)
AS
SELECT fname, Lname ,
LOWER(LEFT (fname,1) + lname) )
Is one of them is better?
Paulo
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 6, 2006
Dear all,
Pls help me with this
I have 2 tables
Trip (TripID, Duration)
Reserve(ReserveID, TripID, StartDay, EndDate)
in which EndDate = StartDay + Trip.Duration
How can I do this?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I have a table with fields called fname (First Name) and lname (LastName). I need the userīs email thai is compose from lname and fname:LOWER(LEFT (fname,1) + lname)Is there any difference between creatig this computed column ia a tableor in a view in SQL Server 2000?I can do:1. CREATE TABLE Users(fname varchar(20),lname varchar(20),email as LOWER(LEFT (fname,1) + lname) )Or2. CREATE TABLE Users (fname varchar(20),lname varchar(20))CREATE VIEW Vw_users (fname, Lname ,email)ASSELECT fname, Lname ,LOWER(LEFT (fname,1) + lname) )Is one of them is better?Paulo*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2006
Hi,
Consider the following example
create table sample
(col1 int,
col2 int ,
col3 AS col1 + col2) PERSISTED NOT NULL)
basically col3 is a computed column. Now when ever a row in col1 or col2 is updated the computed column will reflect the new value. how does this happen in the background. does this use row level triggers or what other mechanism is used to maintain col3 - computed column
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jul 8, 2004
Hi,
What is the difference between a computed column and a UDF?
Is a computed column the same as the "Formula" field under Design Table in Enterprise Manager?
Also, what is the proper syntax for the Formula field? Can I use regular SQL on it or is there more to it?
thanks,
Frank
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 22, 2006
Hi, I have a small problem with my database. I've got following situation: I have a computed column, which value is base on currency rate: rent * rate. Users have to have possibility to change currency rate easily (maybe another table or constant). Is there any way to create formula, which would compute value properly, via constant or something like this? Or the easiest workaround would be load data into dataset (I'm building asp.net application - database will be very small - couple of hundreds of records) and make calculations programmatically?
Przemek
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2007
Hi,
I have a table with 4 columns let us say A,B,C,D.
column D is computed column with formula A + '-' + B
Now, i want to add one more condition to the formula which looks like "A + '-' + B + '-' + C".
Please let me know how to do this using T-SQL as i cannot open the table in design mode in production server.
Thanks in Advance!!
View 12 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2007
Dear Experts, i need one query to find all the indexed columns with table names ,column names and type of indexes....
i'm trying with sysindexes, but i was unable to finish it....i'm not clear about keys column in sysindexes...
please guide me.
thank you very much
View 12 Replies
View Related
Jun 25, 2004
I am having a problem with using UDF as part of a temp table computed column. Here's the sample code:
IF EXISTS( SELECT 1 FROM information_schema.routines WHERE routine_name = 'fn_test')
DROP FUNCTION dbo.fn_testGO
CREATE FUNCTION dbo.fn_test( @x int, @y int)
RETURNS INT AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @z INT
SET @z = @x + @y
RETURN @z
END
GO
CREATE TABLE #X
(
x INT,
y INT,
z AS (dbo.fn_test(x,y))
)
I receive the following error:
Server: Msg 208, Level 16, State 1, Line 2
Invalid object name 'dbo.fn_test'.
I do not get this error if I use a regular table.
HELP!
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 25, 2012
Suppose a table being
Create table myTable (ID int, col1 int, col2 int)
I know how to make a computed column being the sum of other column for the same ID e.g. "computed_column = col1 + col2".
Getting the average would be "computed_column = (col1 + col2)/2" But how to get the Max, Min?
Even "Sum(col1,col2)" or AVG(col1, col2) does not work as the formula for a computed column...
View 9 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2015
I have a table that I cannot allow a computed field to exist on (due to a 3rd party software), so I am thinking I could create a view with a computed field that is persistent, is that possible?
the syntax below will not work, I am not even sure if this is possible, but if it can work, that would be great.
I am wanting to get the sum of jetfoot1, 2 & 3 and have the total added up as "total"
create view ViewSumReport as
select JETFOOT1,JETFOOT2,JETFOOT3,(JETFOOT1+JETFOOT2+JETFOOT3)as [total] persisted
from dbo.fielddata
GO
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2008
I have a checksum calculation as a persisted, indexed computed column on a temporary table that I used to compare against original records to detect changes.
It seems that the update/ insert statements in my procs get out of sync on larger tables (500,000 rows +) with the checksum calculations. The only thing I can think of is that the column calculations are performed asynchronously in relation to the updates/ inserts. This is a problem for me.
Is my assumption correct? If it is, how can I adjust for this, i.e., force the computations to be performed synchronously or wait for the computations to complete before running comparisons?
-Jeremy
___________________________
Geek At Large
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
In SQL Sever, do the size of computed columns gets added to the totalsize of the tables? Does SQL server stores the actual values incomputed columns?Thanks_GJK
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 26, 2006
I need to create an function similar to the "MATCH" function in Excelthat evaluates a number within a set of numbers and returns whetherthere is a match. I have put the example of what I see in excel in thecheck column. The "0" answer in the result column is in the fourthaccount in the list. Somehow I need to loop through the accountscomparing the result to the total and indicate a match in the checkcolumn. It wouldn't even need to tell me the row number; it could be a0 or 1.account total result check123770266.84124.2112377026131.050 412377026164.38-33.33123770260131.051237702678.7152.3412377167-31.34221.891237716731.34159.211237716738.55152 51237716731.34159.211237716715238.5512377167490.91-300.36123771670190.55123771670190.5512377167-31.3443.341237716731.34-19.341237716738.55-26.551237716731.34-19.3412377167152-14012377167490.91-478.9112377167012123771670121237736347.058412377363131.05012377363-45.38176.4312377363-47.05178.11237736347.0484.0112377363-47.04178.091237736347.058412377363541.11-410.06123773630131.0512377363672.15-541.11237750737.64152.91
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2008
I have a checksum calculation as a persisted, indexed computed column on a temporary table that I used to compare against original records to detect changes.
It seems that the update/ insert statements in my procs get out of sync on larger tables (500,000 rows +) with the checksum calculations. The only thing I can think of is that the column calculations are performed asynchronously in relation to the updates/ inserts. This is a problem for me.
Is my assumption correct? If it is, how can I adjust for this, i.e., force the computations to be performed synchronously or wait for the computations to complete before running comparisons?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 12, 2007
Does tsql allow sth like
Select col1*col2 as ComputedColumn, ComputedColumn + 2 as NewColumn
From T_Table
THis is possible in Access.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2007
Hello,
does anyone know a website, where I can read something about the syntax of Computed Columns?
I don't know how to enter the following expression in the computed columns field of MS SQL Server:
When x-y < 0 Then 0 else x-y
Thank you
M-l-G
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Using SS2K, I'm getting the following error while bulk inserting:Column 'warranty_expiration_date' cannot be modified because it is acomputed column.Here is my bulk insert statement:BULK INSERT dbo.TestDataFROM 'TestData.dat'WITH (CHECK_CONSTRAINTS,FIELDTERMINATOR='|',MAXERRORS = 1,FORMATFILE='TestData.fmt')The computed column is not referenced in the format file and the data filedoes not contain the computed data.Thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 1, 2015
I have created a table from another table where I specified that one of the fields, an number field, is sorted in ascending order and have NOT specified that it is to be an indexed field and there are 10 million records, from 1 to 10,000,000 exactly.
Now, if I query that table, asking to return records 1-1,000 from that non indexed number field that I sorted in ascending order (where number field <= 1,000) , will it run as fast as if it were indexed?
In other words, does SQL know somehow that these records are sorted in ascending order and so will not do a full table scan, stopping at 1,000 to return my data set?
Or is there no way for SQL to know this and only specifying an indexed field allows SQL to know that its in some order and so it doesn't have to do the full scan?
View 15 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2001
I have an indexed view with a clustered index on my database........when I try to run and update statement agaisnt the table that is referenced in the view, I get one of the following errors:
Server: Msg 3624, Level 20, State 1, Line 1
Location: q:SPHINXNTDBMSstorengdrsinclude
ecord.inl:1447
Expression: m_SizeRec > 0 && m_SizeRec <= MAXDATAROW
SPID: 52
Process ID: 414
Connection Broken
Server: Msg 3624, Level 20, State 1, Line 1
Location: recbase.cpp:1371
Expression: m_nVars > 0
SPID: 52
Process ID: 414
Connection Broken
any ideas?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2008
I am tryung to create a indexed view..
CREATE VIEW vwLookAdmissionRecord
WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
select episode_key as episode_key, ee.object_key, ee.encounter_begin_dt , cp.procedure from dbo.encounters e
join (
select episode_key as minepisode, min(isnull(e.object_key,e.Object_key_History) ) as object_key, min(e.encounter_begin_dt)as encounter_begin_dt
from dbo.encounters e
join dbo.CD_Procedure CP on CP.Procedure_CD = e.procedure_cd
where cp.procedure > 0
group by e.episode_key
)ee on e.object_key = ee.object_key
join dbo.cd_procedure cp on cp.procedure_cd = e.procedure_cd
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX IDX_V1
ON vwLookAdmissionRecord (episode_key)
but i keep getting an error:
annot create index on view "dbo.vwLookAdmissionRecord" because it references derived table "ee" (defined by SELECT statement in FROM clause). Consider removing the reference to the derived table or not indexing the view.
How can I fix this?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2008
Hi,
Iam using SqlBulkCopy to copy data of all the tables from one database to another database. SqlBulkCopy runs just fine but it throws exception for one of the tables which is having computed column.
snnipet of code is
For Cnt = 0 To oDS.Tables(0).Rows.Count - 1
oSqlCmd2 = New SqlCommand
oSqlCmd2.Connection = oConn
oSqlCmd2.CommandText = "select * from " & "" & oDS.Tables(0).Rows(Cnt).Item(0).ToString & " "
'Dim reader As SqlDataReader
oDS2 = New DataSet
oDA2 = New SqlDataAdapter
oDA2.SelectCommand = oSqlCmd2
'reader = oSqlCmd2.ExecuteReader
oDA2.Fill(oDS2, "test")
Dim bulkData As SqlBulkCopy = New SqlBulkCopy(oConn2)
'Get the data from the second database and fill the dataset
oDA2 = New SqlDataAdapter
bulkData.DestinationTableName = "" & oDS.Tables(0).Rows(Cnt).Item(0).ToString & " "
bulkData.BatchSize = 1000
bulkData.BulkCopyTimeout = 2000
bulkData.WriteToServer(oDS2.Tables(0))
oDS2.Dispose()
oSqlCmd2.Dispose()
Next
For one of the tables iam getting the following error
The column "Col4" cannot be modified because it is either a computed column or is the result of a UNION operator
Since iam fetching table names at runtime its not possible to use columnMappings.
So, how to come out of this situation.
TIA
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 10, 2015
I am receiving error msg on the below query line as "incorrect syntax near MSF" , "Incoorect syntanx near ExtCost", "incorrect syntax near From on line 28"
SELECT
xxxcolumns,
(rj.RECEIVEDLINEAL * ((r.WIDTH / 12.0)) / 1000.0 MSF,
Case
when rv.PricePerCode = 'MSF' Then
((rj.RECEIVEDLINEAL * (r.WIDTH / 12.0)) / 1000.0) * rv.price
[Code] ....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2007
I want to create a computed column with this formula:
ISNULL(NULLIF (tot_mnc, 0) / NULLIF (repl_value, 0), 0)
It works in a straight select query, but when I put it in the formula of the table design window, I get an error "Error validating the formula for column 'test_fci'"
I don't know if it's relevant but repl_value is itself a computed column with the formula:
(repl_value_e_g + repl_value_aux)
Is it possible to use the system functions in a computed column? If not, how would I pass those values into a udf and use it for the formula?
Thanks.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 18, 2005
Hi All Gurus,
I am getting an error while inserting in table
INSERT failed because the following SET options have incorrect settings: 'ARITHABORT'.
There has been no change made in the database. It was working till yesterday.
Please help. Thanks in advance
Regards
Sachin Samuel
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2006
Hi,
I have set up a publisher using transactional replication. ( all seems ok). The initial snapshot has been generated.
The replication share on the distributor has all the generated DDL in it.
I add a subscriber. The tables are generated up to tblCountry then I get an incorrect syntax near ')' error
The Replication Monitor shows the following code as the cause. ( bold indicates incorrect sql)
Is this a bug in Replication (as this is an autogenerated sp)or have I configured something incorrectly?
The ddl for the table index is as follows ( from the replication folder)
/----
CREATE TABLE [APP].[tblCountry](
[CountryId] AS ([ISO 3166-1 NUMERIC-3]) PERSISTED NOT NULL,
[CountryCode] AS ([ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-2]) PERSISTED NOT NULL,
[CountryName] [varchar](80) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS NOT NULL,
[ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-2] [char](2) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS NOT NULL,
[ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-3] [char](3) COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS NOT NULL,
[ISO 3166-1 NUMERIC-3] [int] NOT NULL
)
GO
---/
/------ Keys ddl (.dx)
ALTER TABLE [APP].[tblCountry] ADD CONSTRAINT [PK_TBLCOUNTRY] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED ([CountryId])
go
ALTER TABLE [APP].[tblCountry] ADD CONSTRAINT [UQ_TBLCOUNTRY_ALPHA2] UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED ([ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-2])
go
ALTER TABLE [APP].[tblCountry] ADD CONSTRAINT [UQ_TBLCOUNTRY_ALPHA3] UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED ([ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-3])
go
ALTER TABLE [APP].[tblCountry] ADD CONSTRAINT [UQ_TBLCOUNTRY_COUNTRYNAME] UNIQUE NONCLUSTERED ([CountryName])
go
--------/
/------------
Command attempted:
create procedure "sp_MSins_APPtblCountry_msrepl_ccs"
@c1 int,@c2 varchar(80),@c3 char(2),@c4 char(3),@c5 int
as
begin
if exists ( select * from "APP"."tblCountry"
where
)
begin
update "APP"."tblCountry" set
"CountryName" = @c2
,"ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-2" = @c3
,"ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-3" = @c4
,"ISO 3166-1 NUMERIC-3" = @c5
where
end
else
begin
insert into "APP"."tblCountry"(
"CountryName"
,"ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-2"
,"ISO 3166-1 ALPHA-3"
,"ISO 3166-1 NUMERIC-3"
)
values (
@c2
,@c3
,@c4
(Transaction sequence number: 0x00000016000004F2014500000000, Command ID: 213)
------------/
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 16, 2007
Hiya
I have recently set up a view with a clustered and a non-clustered index on it (t-SQL is below). To create the view and indexes I set arithabort to on as per the help file articles. However, this setting is causing the following error when my application calls a stored procedure setting values in a table:
The transaction was rolled back for the following reason:
UPDATE failed because the following SET options have incorrect settings: 'ARITHABORT'. Verify that SET options are correct for use with indexed views and/or indexes on computed columns and/or query notifications and/or xml data type methods.
Last Query: MFSetApplicant
I am including 2 columns from the table the sp is trying to update in the view. The sp is a very basic update statement, setting all the values in the table row and using the primary key in the where clause. The sp ran fine with no errors prior to changing the setting of arithabort and adding the view and indexes and has been doing so for the last 5 years.
I have tried setting arithabort to off and the error keeps being thrown. I have tried tracing the transaction and can see nothing wrong with the way the sp is being used or the parameters being passed in. Is there any way to change this setting back to off so I can stop this error being thrown? Am I missing something obvious?
thanks
Code Block
SET NUMERIC_ROUNDABORT OFF;
SET ANSI_PADDING, ANSI_WARNINGS, CONCAT_NULL_YIELDS_NULL, ARITHABORT,
QUOTED_IDENTIFIER, ANSI_NULLS ON;
Go
CREATE VIEW [dbo].[View_LeadMatching] WITH SCHEMABINDING
AS
SELECT dbo.MFApplicants.ApplicantNo, dbo.MFApplicants.Surname, dbo.MFApplicantContactDetails.PostCode
FROM dbo.MFApplicants INNER JOIN dbo.MFApplicantContactDetails
ON dbo.MFApplicants.ApplicantNo = dbo.MFApplicantContactDetails.ApplicantNo
AND dbo.MFApplicants.MortgageRef = dbo.MFApplicantContactDetails.MortgageRef
GO
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX IX_View_LeadMatching_ApplicantNo
ON [View_LeadMatching] (ApplicantNo);
GO
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX IX_View_LeadMatching
ON [View_LeadMatching] (Surname, Postcode)
GO
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 26, 2006
Hi,
I was recently experiencing a slowness when executing stored procedures from a .NET Application, but it went fast when executing from Query Analyzer. Research led me to find that by turning ArithAbort ON that it forces the SQL Server to use the same Execution plan whether the request is coming from Query Analyzer or the Application.
My concern now is the effect of ArithAbort. I understand what turning this option does, but I am trying to think of a scenario where turning it on could be bad. Does anyone have any suggestions on what I should be aware of when disabling/enabling ArithAbort or ArithIgnore?
Thanks.
-Brian
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 3, 2007
INSERT [DELETE] failed because the following SET options have incorrect settings: 'ARITHABORT'. Verify that SET options are correct for use with indexed views and/or indexes on computed columns and/or query notifications and/or xml data type methods.
On local dev machine with SQL Express DB everything works fine. Once moved to shared hosting environment (with adjustments to web.config), insert and delete stored procedures produce the above error.
Made sure that stored procedures SET ARITHABORT ON at the beginning and OFF at the end, without success. Even SET ARITHABORT ON at DB level without success.
Suggestions appreciated
View 2 Replies
View Related
