According to BOL, columns in an ORDER BY clause do not have to be in the SELECT
column list unless the SELECT includes DISTINCT, or the UNION operator.
Is this a SQL Server thing, or SQL standard behavior? That is, if I were to write
absolutely pure SQL-92, must columns in the ORDER BY clause be present in the SELECT
list?
The following returns all base tables within the database of type "varchar":
Code:
SELECT TABLE_SCHEMA, TABLE_NAME, COLUMN_NAME FROM mydb.information_schema.columns
WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA = 'master' AND TABLE_CATALOG = 'mydb'
AND DATA_TYPE IN('varchar')"
AND TABLE_NAME IN(
SELECT TABLE_NAME FROM mydb.information_schema.tables
WHERE TABLE_TYPE = 'BASE TABLE' AND TABLE_CATALOG = 'mydb' AND TABLE_SCHEMA = 'master')
What I then want to do is... For each of these results:
Code:
select [COLUMN_NAME] from [TABLE_SCHEMA].[TABLE_NAME]
WHERE ID = 'test'
Is it possible to do this in one SQL command? Or do I manually have to do it for each in the list from my first query?
Hi there,
This appears to be a change in behaviour between SQL 2000 & 2005. Can anyone confirm?
We have two tables with same schema but different column orders. In Sql 2000, the statement
Insert Into table1 select * from table2
appears to map the column names between the two tables. There is one column out of order, however Sql 2000 doesn't seem to care and correctly inserts the data.
In Sql 2005 the behaviour is to return the columns in the order of table2, rather than mapping column names. This results in incorrect values being added to the columns. (Column shift)
The Sql 2005 behaviour seems to be correct, and select * is bad practice anyway, however I would like to confirm why this was changed and whether there is a service pack/hotfix in 2000 that would have the same result.
We are running compatibility mode in Sql 2005 v9.0.3042.
Sql 2000 is 8.0.2187
thanks,
Andrew
Usually it is better to include the columns in the index that are in where clause, select list and join.I am thinking that the columns in the selected list is better to keep as index columns and the columns that are in the where clause is better to keep in key columns.Where do we use join column is it better to create as main key column or included column.
View 4 Replies View RelatedHi!
I recently run into a senario when a procedure quiered a table without a order by clause. Luckily it retrived data in the prefered order.
The table returns the data in the same order in SQL Manager "Open Table"
So I started to wonder what deterimins the sort order when there is no order by clause ?
I researched this for a bit but found no straight answers. My table has no PK, but an identiy column.
Peace.
/P
I have a select list of fields that I need to select to get the results I need, however, I would like to insert only a chosen few of these fields into a table. I am getting the error, "The select list for the INSERT statement contains more items than the insert list. The number of SELECT values must match the number of INSERT columns."
How can I do this?
Insert Query:
insert into tsi_payments (PPID, PTICKETNUM, PLINENUM, PAMOUNT, PPATPAY, PDEPOSITDATE, PENTRYDATE, PHCPCCODE)
SELECT DISTINCT
tri_IDENT.IDA AS PPID,
tri_Ldg_Tran.CLM_ID AS PTicketNum,
tri_ClaimChg.Line_No AS PLineNum,
tri_Ldg_Tran.Tran_Amount AS PAmount,
CASE WHEN tln_PaymentTypeMappings.PTMMarsPaymentTypeCode = 'PATPMT'
THEN tri_ldg_tran.tran_amount * tln_PaymentTypeMappings.PTMMultiplier
ELSE 0 END AS PPatPay,
tri_Ldg_Tran.Create_Date AS PDepositDate,
tri_Ldg_Tran.Tran_Date AS PEntryDate,
tri_ClaimChg.Hsp_Code AS PHCPCCode,
tri_Ldg_Tran.Adj_Type,
tri_Ldg_Tran.PRS_ID,
tri_Ldg_Tran.Create_Time,
tri_Ldg_Tran.Adj_Group,
tri_Ldg_Tran.Payer_ID,
tri_Ldg_Tran.TRN_ID,
tri_ClaimChg.Primary_Claim,
tri_IDENT.Version
FROM [AO2AO2].MARS_SYS.DBO.tln_PaymentTypeMappings tln_PaymentTypeMappings RIGHT OUTER JOIN
qs_new_pmt_type ON tln_PaymentTypeMappings.PTMClientPaymentDesc =
qs_new_pmt_type.New_Pmt_Type RIGHT OUTER JOIN
tri_Ldg_Tran RIGHT OUTER JOIN
tri_IDENT LEFT OUTER JOIN
tri_ClaimChg ON tri_IDENT.Pat_Id1 =
tri_ClaimChg.Pat_ID1 ON tri_Ldg_Tran.PRS_ID =
tri_ClaimChg.PRS_ID AND
tri_Ldg_Tran.Chg_TRN_ID =
tri_ClaimChg.Chg_TRN_ID
AND tri_Ldg_Tran.Pat_ID1 = tri_IDENT.Pat_Id1 LEFT OUTER JOIN
tri_Payer ON tri_Ldg_Tran.Payer_ID
= tri_Payer.Payer_ID ON qs_new_pmt_type.Pay_Type
= tri_Ldg_Tran.Pay_Type AND
qs_new_pmt_type.Tran_Type = tri_Ldg_Tran.Tran_Type
WHERE (tln_PaymentTypeMappings.PTMMarsPaymentTypeCode <> N'Chg')
AND (tln_PaymentTypeMappings.PTMClientCode = 'SR')
AND (tri_ClaimChg.Primary_Claim = 1)
AND (tri_IDENT.Version = 0)
I have a function dbo.FIELD that extracts a part of the value from a field. I want to get two pieces and order by them.
Select failed: Warning: 169(15): A column has been specified more than once in the order by list. Columns in the order by list must be unique.
How can I do this?
SELECT WORK_ID FROM WORK ORDER BY dbo.FIELD(WORK_ID, '*', 2) ASC, dbo.FIELD(WORK_ID, '*', 1) ASC
These work:
SELECT WORK_ID FROM WORK ORDER BY dbo.FIELD(WORK_ID, '*', 2) ASC, WORK_ID ASC
SELECT WORK_ID FROM WORK ORDER BY dbo.FIELD(WORK_ID, '*', 2) ASC, dbo.FIELD('WORK_ID', '*', 1) ASC
I have a function dbo.FIELD that extracts a part of the value from a field. I want to get two pieces and order by them.
Select failed: Warning: 169(15): A column has been specified more than once in the order by list. Columns in the order by list must be unique.
How can I do this?
SELECT WORK_ID FROM WORK ORDER BY dbo.FIELD(WORK_ID, '*', 2) ASC, dbo.FIELD(WORK_ID, '*', 1) ASC
These work:
SELECT WORK_ID FROM WORK ORDER BY dbo.FIELD(WORK_ID, '*', 2) ASC, WORK_ID ASC
SELECT WORK_ID FROM WORK ORDER BY dbo.FIELD(WORK_ID, '*', 2) ASC, dbo.FIELD('WORK_ID', '*', 1) ASC
I need to be able to order the results of a SELECT query by the order of a specific list of key IDs provided in the WHERE IN statement.
So my query looks like:
SELECT *
FROM TableName
WHERE KeyID IN (3,104,43,22,345)
ORDER BY ????
I need the results returned in the order provided in the IN list (3,104,43,22,345).
Thanks in advance!
pr0
After a customer decides to buy a shopping list, there is generally aneed to store/insert one master record and a variable number of childdetail records, preferably all wrapped in a transaction. There are lotsof ways to do this and I am wondering if anyone knows which is mostefficient.One approach is to use ADO.NET's transaction capabilities, definesingle-record insert procs for the master and detail tables, and callthe detail insert in a loop from the web page. This has N+1 trips tothe server, which is not too attractive.Another approach is to concatenate all the data into a bigstring/varchar variable and pass it to a decoder proc that would thencall the single record insert procs via a loop inside the decoder proc.This second approach would use T-SQL's transaction capability and haveonly one trip to the server, but it is more effort to code on the webpage and in the decoder proc.Surely this is a common problem. Are there any more elegant/efficientmethods that anyone can suggest? Can one pass an array to a proc? Isthis a place for a user defined data type?Any advice is much appreciated.
View 2 Replies View RelatedLets say I have a table named [Leadership] and I want to select the field 'leadershipName' from the [Leadership] Table.
My query would look something like this:
Select leadershipName
From Leadership
Now, I would like to order the results of this query... but I don't want to simply order them by ASC or DESC. Instead, I need to order them as follows:
Executive Board Members, Delegates, Grievance Chairs, and Negotiators
My question: Can this be done through MS SQL or do I need to add a field to my [Leadership] table named 'leadershipImportance' or something as an integer to denote the level of importance of the position so that I can order on that value ASC or DESC?
Thanks,
Zoop
<asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource1" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:NWHCConnectionString %>"
SelectCommand="SELECT [Title], [URL], [Date] FROM [Article] ORDER BY [Date] DESC"></asp:SqlDataSource>
<asp:Repeater id="myRepeaterUL" runat="server" DataSourceID="SqlDataSource1">
<HeaderTemplate>
<ul>
</HeaderTemplate>
<ItemTemplate>
<li><a href="<%# DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "URL") %>"><%#DataBinder.Eval(Container.DataItem, "Title")%></a><br /><%# Eval("Date") %></li>
</ItemTemplate>
<FooterTemplate>
</ul>
</FooterTemplate>
</asp:Repeater>
This is my code above, I am trying to order them to show the four new list of news. Here is a picture, yeah its old and everybody loves pictures. see the box on the right, i want to show only four, not all of it.
need help how to
change the shift order in my stord prosege backward
on the field "shifttype"
not like this
shifttype
---------------------------------------------------------
111111 2008-02-24 Sunday 1
111111 2008-02-23 Saturday 2
111111 2008-02-22 Friday 3
111111 2008-02-21 Thursday 4
111111 2008-02-20 Wednesday 5
111111 2008-02-19 Tuesday 6
111111 2008-02-18 Monday 7
111111 2008-02-17 Sunday 8
111111 2008-02-16 Saturday 1
111111 2008-02-15 Friday 2
111111 2008-02-14 Thursday 3
111111 2008-02-13 Wednesday 4
111111 2008-02-12 Tuesday 5
111111 2008-02-11 Monday 6
111111 2008-02-10 Sunday 7
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i need it like this
shifttype
------------------------------------------------------
111111 2008-02-24 Sunday 8
111111 2008-02-23 Saturday 7
111111 2008-02-22 Friday 6
111111 2008-02-21 Thursday 5
111111 2008-02-20 Wednesday 4
111111 2008-02-19 Tuesday 3
111111 2008-02-18 Monday 2
111111 2008-02-17 Sunday 1
111111 2008-02-16 Saturday 8
111111 2008-02-15 Friday 7
111111 2008-02-14 Thursday 6
111111 2008-02-13 Wednesday 5
111111 2008-02-12 Tuesday 4
111111 2008-02-11 Monday 3
111111 2008-02-10 Sunday 2
Code Snippet
if object_ID('tempdb..#emplist','U')<>0
Drop Table #emplist
if object_ID('tempdb..#empshifts','U')<>0
Drop Table #empshifts
go
declare @g datetime
select @g=getdate()
CREATE table #empList (
[empID] int NOT NULL,
[ShiftType] int NULL,
[StartDate] datetime NOT NULL,
[EndDate] datetime NOT NULL
)
INSERT INTO #empList ([empID], [ShiftType],[StartDate],[EndDate])
SELECT 111111,1,CONVERT(DATETIME, '01/01/2008', 103), CONVERT(DATETIME, '27/02/2009', 103) UNION ALL
SELECT 222222,2,CONVERT(DATETIME, '01/01/2008', 103),CONVERT(DATETIME, '27/02/2009', 103)UNION ALL
SELECT 333333,3,CONVERT(DATETIME, '01/01/2008', 103), CONVERT(DATETIME, '27/02/2009', 103)UNION ALL
SELECT 444444,4,CONVERT(DATETIME, '01/01/2008', 103), CONVERT(DATETIME, '27/02/2009', 103)UNION ALL
SELECT 555555,5,CONVERT(DATETIME, '01/01/2008', 103),CONVERT(DATETIME, '27/02/2009', 103)
-- create shifts table
CREATE table #empShifts (
[empID] numeric(18, 0) NOT NULL,
[ShiftDate] datetime NOT NULL,
[ShiftType] int NULL ,
[startingShiftType] int not null
)
create unique clustered index uc_empshifts on #empshifts(empid,shiftdate DESC)
declare @curr_employee int
declare @shift_id int
declare @dummyShift int
declare @dummyEmp int
--start by populating the dates into the @empshifts table
insert #empshifts (
empid,
shiftdate,
[startingShiftType]
)
select
empid,
dateadd(day,-1*spt.number,Enddate),
shifttype
from #empList cross join
master..spt_values spt
where
spt.type='P'
and spt.number<=datediff(day, startdate,enddate)
--now set up the shifts as the cursor solution did
select @shift_id=0, @curr_employee=0
update e
set
@shift_ID=shiftType=(case when @curr_employee=empid then @shift_ID else startingShiftType end -1 +
CASE WHEN @shift_id in ( 1,2,3) and DATENAME (dw,ShiftDate )='Friday' then 0
WHEN @shift_id= 8 and DATENAME (dw,ShiftDate )='Saturday' then 0
else 1 end)%8+1,
@dummyshift=@shift_ID,
@curr_employee =empid,
@dummyemp=@curr_employee
from #empshifts e WITH (index(uc_empshifts),TABLOCK) OPTION (MAXDOP 1)
--show the results
select empid,shiftdate, DATENAME (dw,ShiftDate ),shifttype from #empshifts
--select datediff(ms,@g,getdate())
I have a business need to create a report by query data from a MS SQL 2008 database and display the result to the users on a web page. The report initially has 6 columns of data and 2 out of 6 have JSON data so the users request to have those 2 JSON columns parse into 15 additional columns (first JSON column has 8 key/value pairs and the second JSON column has 7 key/value pairs). Here what I have done so far:
I found a table value function (fnSplitJson2) from this link [URL]. Using this function I can parse a column of JSON data into a table. So when I use the function above against the first column (with JSON data) in my query (with CROSS APPLY) I got the right data back the but I got 8 additional rows of each of the row in my table. The reason for this side effect is because the function returned a table of 8 row (8 key/value pairs) for each json string data that it parsed.
1. First question: How do I modify my current query (see below) so that for each row in my table i got back one row with 19 columns.
SELECT A.ITEM1,A.ITEM2,A.ITEM3,A.ITEM4, B.*
FROM PRODUCT A
CROSS APPLY fnSplitJson2(A.ITEM5,NULL) B
If updated my query (see below) and call the function twice within the CROSS APPLY clause I got this error: "The multi-part identifier "A.ITEM6" could be be bound.
2. My second question: How to i get around this error?
SELECT A.ITEM1,A.ITEM2,A.ITEM3,A.ITEM4, B.*, C.*
FROM PRODUCT A
CROSS APPLY fnSplitJson2(A.ITEM5,NULL) B, fnSplitJson2(A.ITEM6,NULL) C
I am using Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 version. Windows 7 desktop.
I'm doing a INSERT...SELECT where I'm dependent on the records SELECT:ed to be in a certain order. This order is enforced through a clustered index on that table - I can see that they are in the proper order by doing just the SELECT part.
However, when I do the INSERT, it doesn't work (nothing is inserted) - can the order of the records from the SELECT part be changed internally on their way to the INSERT part, so to speak?
Actually - it is a view that I'm inserting into, and there's an instead-of-insert trigger on it that does the actual insertions into the base table. I've added a "PRINT" statement to the trigger code and there's just ONE record printed (there should be millions).
I want to get the list of items present in that order based on the confidentiality code of that product or Item and confidentiality code of the user.
I display the list of orders in first grid, by selecting the order in first grid I display the Items present in that order based on the confidentiality code of that item.
whenever order in 1st grid is selected i want to display the items that the item code should be less than or equal to the confidentiality code of the logged-in user other items should not display.
If the all the items present in the order having confidentiality code greater than Logged-in user at that time the order no# should not display in the first grid.
Table 1:Order
Order_Id Order_No Customer_Id
2401 1234567 23
2402 1246001 24
2403 1246002 25
Table 2 : OrderedItems
OrderItem_Id Order_Id Item_Id Sequence
1567 2401 1001 1
1568 2401 1003 2
1569 2402 1005 1
1570 2402 1007 2
1571 2403 1010 1
Table 3: ItemMaster
Item_Id Item_Name confidentCode
1001 Rice Null
1003 Wheet 7
1005 Badham Null
1007 Oil 6
1010 Pista 8
Out put for 1st grid
**Note :** Logged-in user have confidentiality code 6
Order No Customer
1234567 23
1246001 24
3rd order is not displayed in the grid
After user selects the 1st order in the grid then the items present in that 1st order should be displayed as
1001 Rice
the second item not displayed because that having confidentiality code greater than user.
After user selects the 2nd order in the grid then the items present in that order should displays
1005 Badham
1007 Oil
I need the query to display the order details in 1st grid.
I'd like to first figure out the count of how many rows are not the Current Edition have the following:
Second I'd like to be able to select the primary key of all the rows involved
Third I'd like to select all the primary keys of just the rows not in the current edition
Not really sure how to describe this without making a dataset
CREATE TABLE [Project].[TestTable1](
[TestTable1_pk] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[Source_ID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Edition_fk] [int] NOT NULL,
[Key1_fk] [int] NOT NULL,
[Key2_fk] [int] NOT NULL,
[Code] .....
Group by fails me because I only want the groups where the Edition_fk don't match...
I have the following data:
Name Played Won
Player 1 15 14
Player 2 15 5
Player 3 14 13
Player 4 14 1
I want to be able to order by the number of games won by the highest played. So in the example above, I would get:
Name Played Won
Player 1 15 14
Player 3 14 13
Player 2 15 5
Player 4 14 1
How can I achieve that?
Dear Folks,
Can you please tell me the query to display the columns in a table?
thank you very much
Vinod
Trying to build a list of order numbers based on stock availability.
The data looks something like this:
OrderNumber Stockcode quantityordered quantityinstock
123 code1 10 5
123 code2 5 10
124 code3 15 20
124 code4 10 10
In this case I would like to output a single result for each order, but based on stock availability order 123 is not a complete order and 124 is so the results will need to reflect this.
Any list of commands that require exclusive access in order for the command to complete? I had an instance today where a DBA executed sp_changedbowner command which is the alter database command on a production database and it locked it up.
View 0 Replies View RelatedI have a requirement to show Day of week in parameter drop down list in different order, actual order is Monday to Sunday (Monday,Tuesday,Wednesday,Thursday,Friday,Saturday,Sunday) in DayOfWeek dimension in cube.
But my requirement is to show Friday to Thursday(Friday,Saturday,Sunday,Monday,Tuesday,Wednesday,Thursday) in DayOf Week parameter drop down list and report table. How I can get this requirement done.
I am working on a Statistical Reporting system where:
Data Repository: SQL Server 2005
Business Logic Tier: Views, User Defined Functions, Stored Procedures
Data Access Tier: Stored Procedures
Presentation Tier: Reporting ServicesThe end user will be able to slice & dice the data for the report by
different organizational hierarchies
different number of layers within a hierarchy
select a organization or select All of the organizations with the organizational hierarchy
combinations of selection criteria, where this selection criteria is independent of each other, and also differeBelow is an example of 2 Organizational Hierarchies:
Hierarchy 1
Country -> Work Group -> Project Team (Project Team within Work Group within Country)
Hierarchy 2
Client -> Contract -> Project (Project within Contract within Client)Based on 2 different Hierarchies from above - here are a couple of use cases:
Country = "USA", Work Group = "Network Infrastructure", Project Team = all teams
Country = "USA", Work Group = all work groups
Client = "Client A", Contract = "2007-2008 Maint", Project = "Accounts Payable Maintenance"
Client = "Client A", Contract = "2007-2008 Maint", Project = all
Client = "Client A", Contract = allI am totally stuck on:
How to implement the data interface (Stored Procs) to the Reports
Implement the business logic to handle the different hierarchies & different number of levelsI did get help earlier in this forum for how to handle a parameter having a specific value or NULL value (to select "all")
(WorkGroup = @argWorkGroup OR @argWorkGrop is NULL)
Any Ideas? Should I be doing this in SQL Statements or should I be looking to use Analysis Services.
Thanks for all your help!
I am familiar with the ALTER TABLE syntax that can be used to add columns to an existing table, but the columns are appended to the end of the table. Enterprise Manager allows you to insert a column in the desired place in the table, but I suspect that behind the scenes it creates a temp table with the new structure, drops the old version of the table and renames the temp table to the orginal table name (I could be wrong on this).
Is there a way to insert a new column in a specific place in a table using SQL rather than EM?
I want to make an index with the following columns, actually together they constitute the PK of the table so the index is created automatically.
The question is witch sort order is the best to have if I want to fetch all rows for one date and one resource? And why?
WHERE Resource = "Car 1" AND Date = "2013-03-03"
Resource, Date, Time
Or
Date, Time, Resource
Below is an example with tree resources, but in reality there can be a lot more and also years of dates.
Car 1, 2013-03-03, 10.00
Car 1, 2013-03-03, 11.00
Car 1, 2013-03-03, 12.00
Car 1, 2013-03-04, 10.00
[Code] ......
how do I get value from column using list of tables?
For example, I have list:
schema_name, table_name, column_name
How do I get:
schema_name, table_name, column_name, column_value
Is there a dynamic management view or system procedure which I can use to find out what columns are in an index, what columns are as an INCLUDE in the index and whether or not the column(s) are ascending or descending. This is excluding the utilities I already know about below:
sys.indexes
sys.index_columns
sp_helpindex
dm_db_index_physical_stats
dm_db_index_operational_stats
I only ask because it is a pain to look through the sys.indexes and sys.index_columns tables every time I want to know about what columns are in the index created. I also know that scripting the index would give me the information I need but there must be a better way.
Many Thanks
Hi, I am using MS SQL Server 2005 9.00.1399.00. I am trying to make a PivotReport.
Everything is fine, but the columns are are ordered alphabetically, but i want that they are ordered in a specific way.
So i just created a new column ProcId in the Query, but how can i order the columns with the new column but display the other values.
i hope you understand what i mean!?
thanks
Philipp
Hi All.
I'm an Oracle DBA who's currently being asked to look at a SqlServer Database. I need a list of columns per table, but am having trouble.
I'll admit I might be being lazy here, but I'm in a hurry and using the valueable resources available to me!! Would really appreciate the sql i need to copy into the query window. Much obliged!!
I need........
Table A
Column1 Datatype
Column2 Datatype
Table B
Column1 Datatype
Column2 Datatype
etc....
Many thanks.
Hi
I am using a OLE_DB component source which connects to sqlserver and runs a query and the output of the query is written to a flat file destination.
Something like this
SELECT col1,
col2,
col3,
col4
FROM my_table
when i check in the mapping i see
col2 ------col2
col4-------col4
col3-------col3
...........
and thats what gets written to the flatfile destination.
i want SSIS to preserve the column order and write it as col1,col2,col3,col4
instead of what is happening now and it gets written as col2,col4,col3....
i am running sql2k5 and SSIS with sp2
is this a bug is there a solution for this or change the order of the columns for the flat file destination
regards
Hrishy
I'm unable to specify multiple columns in my order by statement if i use a case statement.
Does anyone know why this is, or what syntax would make this work?
Thanks
SELECT ....
ORDER BY (CASE Lower(@SortExpression)
WHEN 'prodname' THEN prodname, prodprice
WHEN 'prodsize' THEN prodsize, prodname
WHEN 'prodprice' THEN prodprice, prodname
Else prodcompany, prodname
END)
I get the following error , when I execute my CTE on SQL Server 2008 R2.CTE1 has more columns than were specified in the column list
--SQL CODE IS AS BELOW
WITH CTE1 (AUCTIONID,[Open Time], [Response SLA Broken], [Response SLA Deadline], [Response SLA Actual], [Responsetime SLA Broken Before Transfer], [Resolution SLA Broken], [Resolution SLADeadline], [Resolutiontime SLA Broken
[code]...
Hey guys,Couldn't find this anywhere in google.I want a list of all database column names for a specific table/viewfrom across database.I tried this...-----------------------------------------------------Select *[color=blue]>From Information_Schema.Columns[/color]-----------------------------------------------------I also tried this...-----------------------------------------------------select syscolumns.name, sysobjects.name, * from syscolumns, sysobjectswheresysobjects.id = syscolumns.idand (sysobjects.xtype='U' or sysobjects.xtype='S')-----------------------------------------------------These queries return information about the CURRENT database.But, if I want to do it ACROSS database or across servers.. how can Ido this?I will express my gratitude to everyone who is kind enough to answerthis question. (I've been stuck with this problem for a while now.)Thanks!OhMyGaw!
View 6 Replies View Related