I know that all the documentation always tells you that sp_recompile will force a stored procedure to recompile the next time it is executed. However, I am not seeing the recompiles in a SQL Trace, when capturing SP: Recompile events. I have tried this on many different database servers, using sp_recompile and also the WITH RECOMPILE option when creating the proc.
I use recompile option in SQL query to dynamic pass variable to optimizer.
I verify explain plan with SET STATISTICS PROFILE ON
and optimizer chose nested lookup ,ok. But if use Display Estimated Execution Plan (CTR+L) I€™ve get merge join. It€™s very confusing, some suggestion €¦?
Use AdventureWorks
go
declare @StartOrderDate datetime
set @StartOrderDate = '20040731'
SELECT * FROM Sales.SalesOrderHeader h, Sales.SalesOrderDetail d
I can't seem to place the "option (recompile)" in any valid position so that the following procedure executes without a syntax error .
USE [PO] GO /****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[npSSUserLoad] Script Date: 4/18/2015 3:57:38 PM ******/ SET ANSI_NULLS ON GO SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
[Code] ...
-- Generated code - DO NOT MODIFY
-- From Object Schema: 'C:XXXXXX.NetPOPOModel\_ObjectSchema
-- To regenerate this procedure use the 'Open With' option on file _ObjectSchema and select POCodeGen.exe
Declare @SqlCmd nvarchar(max) Declare @ParamDefinitions nvarchar(1024) Set @ParamDefinitions = N'@UserId int,NTUser varchar(30), @XmlResult XML OUTPUT' Set @SqlCmd = N'Set @XmlResult = ( Select [UserId] [a], [UserName] [b],
Hi everyone In my SqlServer Management Studio Express, on start up it shows the server type option, but greyed.So that value is fixed to database engine. ( I'm trying to work on an SqlServer Compact Edition database through the SSMStudiothat's why I'm trying to get this to change.)Besides, after I connect i go to the Object Explorer, expand the server node, and go to Replication.When i expand replication, i get the "Local Subscription" option, but nothng for Publication.( I want to work on Merge Replication, that's why I desparately need Publication to work)Am i missing something here? I did not install SqlServer separately, I only have what comes bundled with the Visual Studio 2005 Setup.
We have lots of stored procedures containing temporary tables. In SQL 6.5 every thing was great. But in 7.0, it's doing a lot of recompile while executing. Tried trace flag 8720, didn't work..
Basically I am talking abt this problem : http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q224/5/87.ASP
Let me know if any ideas/Remedies ??? How did any of you tackled this behaviour.
Does someone know whether it is better to drop and reload or sp_recompile a stored procedure to get a new, recompiled execution plan? I have another DBA telling me it is better to drop and reload the stored procedure rather than use sp_recompile. I would think that sp_recompile would be the preferred method.
Is there a way (command or stored procedure) to RECOMPILE or REFRESH a USER DEFINED FUNCTION? I can recompile SPs with sp_recompile and refresh views with sp_refreshView, but I could not find any way to refresh User-defined functions (some of them are like views, with parameters).
Hello:The installation details:W2K SP4, SQL Server 2000 Ent with 1GB RAM. It is a Bi-P3.When I run the Profiler to trace Stored Procedure performance, I get abunch of SP:CacheMiss for couple of stored procedure I invoke quiteoften in a web app.But I do not see SP:Recompile.Here are my questions:i) If the plan is not in the Cache, why am I not see SP: Recompile.Where else can it be tugged.ii) What are the other counters I need to monitor to see if I need morememory.Thanks in advance for any leads on this.Regards:
If my data structure never changes, just the data itself, is there a need to use the "with recompil option" on stored procedures? Isn't there a performance hit having it in the stored procedure?
What's the performance hit for using 'WITH RECOMPILE' in a stored procedure? I'm not a serious DBA, nor do I pretend to be one, but I'm writing a sp_ to be used with both insert and updates. I'm using a variable that defines the operation (IF @operation = 'Update'...) which will be passed at run-time from ColdFusion. Do I need to use the 'WITH RECOMPILE' clause to keep the sp_ kosher with respect to the operation being performed? And what's the damage in resources?
currently i am working on performance tuning on some stored procedure and found that most of the stored procedure include with recompile on top of it.
i try to remove it and now it improve a lot on speed tuning. However, for those stored procedure which is using dynamic sql, is it a must to include recompile in our stored procedure?
Hi!I need to refresh an entire database.I can recompile SPs with sp_recompile (or DBCC FLUSHPROCINDB), andrefresh views with sp_refreshView, but I cannot find any way torefresh my user-defined functions (some of them are like views, withparameters).Any help appreciated :) !Ben
Hi,I have a question in SQL Server 2K, I use SQL Profile to trace, andfind Stored Procedure was auto recompiled, like this row in thetrace:SP:Recompile151680762004-02-27 16:01:11.610How can I stop the auto recompile.ThanksHarold
So I started a new job recently and have noticed a few strange configurations. Typically I would never mess with min memory per query option and index create memory option configuration because i just haven't seen any need to. My typical thought is that if it isn't broke... They have been modified on every single server in my environment.
From Books Online: • This option is an advanced option and should be changed only by an experienced database administrator or certified SQL Server technician. • The index create memory option is self-configuring and usually works without requiring adjustment. However, if you experience difficulties creating indexes, consider increasing the value of this option from its run value.
We are developing a production/management solution for the photo finishing sector. We need a performance of 1 order priced per second. If we run the procedure once we dont have a dramatical performance loss due to recompilation of the stored procs. If we have about 3 consecutive sessions we find the performance loss to be at a rate of about 200 - 500 %. We can't afford this. On the site of msdn we found some reasons why sql server needs to recompile, but since the structure of our db can't be changed in such a manner that this would resolve the problem we need an alternative. All help is greatly appriciated.
We have a problem with one of our MS SQL 2000 databases and some stored procedures.
I'm not sure exactly what the problem is, but these are the symptons....
The stored procedure runs without problems for a period of time. Abruptly, without warning it begins to time out when called from our web application.
Calling it through the query analyzer it runs within a second.
Forcing the stored procedure to recompile allows the web application to start calling it again without it timing out.
We have a DTS package that runs over night and imports a number of records (not sure on the exact numbers, but definately enough to make a difference to indexes) so this could be part of the problem although when I force a recompile I do not do any update stats or anything else.
I wrote a test script to call the stored procedure when it was timing out to ensure it wasn't a web application problem and the procedure continued to time out until the forced recompile. So I don't think the problem is there.
The stored procedure returns multiple results sets and when it starts timing out it is while it is returning the second results sets.
The code for the second results set is...
Select avg(round(p.PricingValue, 5)) as Average, stdev(round(p.PricingValue, 5)) as StdDev, min(p.CaptureDate) as FromDate, max(p.CaptureDate) as ToDate From Pricing p Inner Join Security s On p.SecurityID = s.SecurityID Left Outer Join Issuer i On s.IssuerID = i.IssuerID WHERE p.PricingTypeID = @PricingType And p.TenorTypeID = @TenorType And p.CaptureDate Between @DateFrom And @DateTo AND p.SecurityID IN ( SELECT SecurityId FROM UserResult ur WHERE ur.UserResultSelected = 1 AND ur.UserID = @userID )
Does anyone have any idea what might be going on here?
Hi, I increased one of my base tables column which is referenced in view
I noticed sql server didn't recognized this change and its still showing old field size in the view.
I can simply drop and create it again. But wanted to know if there is any way (command/sp) to recompile the view which will be easy to deploy in production as patch.
I need a way to programmatically (via JDBC) find out which triggers for a table may not compile properly, so that I can disable the bad triggers.
I can do this fine in Oracle but cannot figure out if there's a way to do this in SqlServer. (In Oracle I'd just "alter trigger... compile" and select from user_errors.)
I know how to find the triggers that exist on a table, and I know how to enable/disable individual triggers. I know about sp_recompile, but all that does is flag the trigger for recompile at the next execution.
I need to verify whether the trigger is valid without having to actually invoke it. For example, if there's a bad Update trigger, I don't want to actually execute an update on the table.
One example of what I'm dealing with is this... We have Table A and Table B. There is an update trigger on Table B that references column A.col1. Then we alter Table A to drop col1. Later we have to update Table B. At this point the update will fail because of the bad trigger. I want to find and disable the trigger before executing the update on Table B. If there are other triggers on Table B that are valid, I want to leave them alone.
If I have a view such as: SELECT T.* FROM T When I add a column to table T the view is not updated to reflect that change. Furthermore, if there are other columns after the * in the view (for example SELECT T.*, GETDATE() as "My Date" FROM T) the last columns will contain incorrect data.
Is there a work around for this? An "auto-recompile when tables are modified" kind of option?
Thanks Nick
PS: This is the script I used for testing:
create table tt ( test1 int primary key, test2 int) go insert into tt (test1, test2) values (1,2) go create view vw_tt as select *, getdate() as "My Date" from tt go select * from vw_tt go create view vw_tt2 as select * from tt go alter table tt add test3 int go select * from vw_tt select * from vw_tt2 select * from tt drop table tt drop view vw_tt drop view vw_tt2
We have on demand snapshot replication set up between 2 servers. When the subscriber applies the snapshot, our stored procedures start executing very slowly. Updating statistics and rebuilding indexes does not resolve the problem, however; executing sp_recompile on the affected stored procedures does fix the problem. Is this a known issue with replication? Is there a better workaround than manually recompiling stored procedures after every snapshot?
Everything seems to work well on my desktop during development, but when I deployed the packages to our DEV environment the packages still execute, but I'm now receiving warning messages in the sysdtslog90 log table...
Precompiled script failed to load. Attempting to recompile. For more information, see the Microsoft Knowledge Base article, KB931846 (http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=81885).
My log table (SSISLog) looks OK, with only OnPostExecute messages that include the package / task information and rowcounts.
The KB article suggests upgrading to SP2, but I'm well past SP2, using Build 3159 on both machines.
Any suggestions on how to get rid of the warnings?
This is a solution for a very specific problem, and it's one that you'll hardly ever use, but it's important to know about that one scenario where it can save your neck. Ordinarily, stored procedures are only recompiled if they're no longer in the procedure cache. But if a stored procedure's execution plan is still in the cache, then SQL Server reuses the compiled storedprocedure and its existing execution plan. This is almost always the best course of action. Almost always, but not always.Sometimes, however, reusing an existing plan doesn't offer the most efficient performance. Imagine, for example, that your stored procedure accepts a parameter that determines the natureof a JOIN operation. The results can vary in a big way, so you wouldn't want your procedure to be locked into an execution plan that might be completely inappropriate for that JOIN. In a highlyspecialized case like this, you might want to force SQL Server to recompile the procedure every time the procedure runs. Doing so comes at a performance cost, but this might be offset by thesavings you gain in not executing the procedure with an awful compiled execution plan. Consider carefully whether to use this approach (or whether to re-engineer the over-design of yourapplication to avoid this situation in the first place). Should you need to instruct SQL Server to recompile each time, add the WITH RECOMPILE directive to the procedure, like this: CREATE PROCEDURE ProcName @Param int /* ... other parameters */ WITH RECOMPILE AS /* ... procedure code follows */ If we omit "WITH RECOMPILE", what will be the consequence? Thanks
I created a package with SQL 2005. The package gets the Access DB and then inserts it into SQL Server.
If I open the package in .NET, I can see the SQL Task and Data Flow Task. The SQL Task has a property sqlstatementsource, which has the necxessary SQL code to create the tables.
How can I tell the SQL Task to recompile the SQL code if I give it another DB name, because the tables differ and don't map in the Data Flow Task
I have a table name “StringResources� which contains resources for different cultures. Right now, whenever admin adds any new resource, it immediately available to end user. Now the new requirement came up. We want admin to add resource first and when he is ready with all the resources for particular culture then only the resources should be available to end user. Important: StringResource table has SQLCacheDependecy set. So any change for particular culture will invalidate the cache. This how the select statement looks.SELECT dbo.StringResources.resourceType, dbo.StringResources.cultureCode, dbo.StringResources.resourceKey, dbo.StringResources.resourceValue FROM dbo.StringResources WHERE dbo.StringResources.cultureCode=@cultureCode Which would be the best option below: 1> Add new Boolean column “Published� and show only resources which are published to end user. Advantage: No need of extra table. Disadvantage: This will invalidate the cache every time resource is added even if it’s not published. Other option 2> Add new temporary table with same structure. When admin add new resource, add it to this temp table and when publish move resources to String Resources table. Advantage: Admin will have separate working space. It will invalidate cache only when resources are published. Disadvantage: Need extra table.
How can I get an All option into the cascading prompt? I want to view data for all states in USA. I find I can't proceed to load report unless I have filled in a value for all prompts. Any help?
I have a small doubt. If we enable AWE option we can have advantage of available physical memory.we can have more memory by using max server memory property. then why this AWE option comes in to picture.
I read bol but iam not able to understand what exactly happens.
Could any one tell me why this AWE option if we have max server memory property.
I have a vacation request app I'm designing, and it has a VacationData Table with TotalVac, UsedVac, VacLeft, VacationCarriedOver, and VacCompleted. I need to take the VacLeft and divide by 2 and place that data in the following two spots, one in the VCO and add it to the TotalVac, which is pulled from another table w/hire date and other info. I only need to run this on Jan 1 of every year, any suggestions?