Hi,
i want to create a report so that a list of the top 30 records are returned to the report user. In the report i want to have the records position in the list shown (ie the first row should have 1. and the second should be 2. right on down to the 30th having 30.)
how do i achieve this please?
many thanks
FatherJack
Hi,
I am trying to return the 100th ranking in my SQL, ie
SELECT DailyValueChange, BUSINESS_DATE, RANK() OVER (order by DailyValueChange) AS RANK_Vals
FROM Table
WHERE (BUSINESS_DATE = @CurrentBusDate) AND (RANK_Vals = 100)
However when I try to update the Stored Procedure it tells me RANK_Vals is an invalid column name, which is not the case as if I run it without the Where clase it runs and returns all results.
Any advice on how to get around this would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers
Mark
OOPS Sudden inspiration - got it now
Guys
Spent all morning on this - hope someone can help
I've got some select code :
declare @BusinessDate DATETIME
set @BusinessDate = '28 Feb 2005'
select
--?? as period
tdbe.eventid , tdbe.tradeid ,tdbe.cashflowstartdate
from HDD_t_HA HA
join hdd_t_Hedge_Instrument HI on HA.HAId = HI.HAId
join hdd_t_TDB_Event TDBE on HI.EventId = TDBE.EventId
join hdd_t_TDB TDB on TDBE.TradeId = TDB.TradeId
where ha.haid = 29 and
ha.validfrom <= getdate() and ha.validto > getdate()
and tdbe.effectivefrom <= @BusinessDate and tdbe.effectiveto > @BusinessDate
and tdb.effectivefrom <= @BusinessDate and tdb.effectiveto > @BusinessDate
--and tdbe.tradeid = 117
order by tdbe.tradeid , cashflowstartdate
Which produces :
eventid tradeid cashflowstartdate
121102004-04-19 00:00:00.000
122102004-07-19 00:00:00.000
123102004-10-19 00:00:00.000
124102005-01-19 00:00:00.000
125102005-04-19 00:00:00.000
126102005-07-19 00:00:00.000
127102005-10-19 00:00:00.000
128102006-01-19 00:00:00.000
68101172004-11-16 00:00:00.000
68111172005-05-16 00:00:00.000
68121172005-11-16 00:00:00.000
68131172006-05-16 00:00:00.000
68141172006-11-16 00:00:00.000
68151172007-05-16 00:00:00.000
68161172007-11-16 00:00:00.000
68171172008-05-16 00:00:00.000
68181172008-11-16 00:00:00.000
68191172009-05-16 00:00:00.000
68201172009-11-16 00:00:00.000
68211172010-05-16 00:00:00.000
68221172010-11-16 00:00:00.000
68231172011-05-16 00:00:00.000
I'm trying to derive a 'period' value which is an integer based on the ordering of cashflowstartdatefor each tradeid group. The desired effect is as below
Period eventid tradeid cashflowstartdate
1 121102004-04-19 00:00:00.000
2 122102004-07-19 00:00:00.000
3 123102004-10-19 00:00:00.000
4 124102005-01-19 00:00:00.000
5 125102005-04-19 00:00:00.000
6 126102005-07-19 00:00:00.000
7 127102005-10-19 00:00:00.000
8 128102006-01-19 00:00:00.000
1 68101172004-11-16 00:00:00.000
2 68111172005-05-16 00:00:00.000
3 68121172005-11-16 00:00:00.000
4 68131172006-05-16 00:00:00.000
5 68141172006-11-16 00:00:00.000
6 68151172007-05-16 00:00:00.000
7 68161172007-11-16 00:00:00.000
8 68171172008-05-16 00:00:00.000
9 68181172008-11-16 00:00:00.000
10 68191172009-05-16 00:00:00.000
11 68201172009-11-16 00:00:00.000
12 68211172010-05-16 00:00:00.000
13 68221172010-11-16 00:00:00.000
14 68231172011-05-16 00:00:00.000
Hope this makes and thanks in advance
Hello,
I'm hoping someone can help me out with this. In order to add an sequence dimension in an ssas cube, I need to rank chronological item in a t-sql data set in order of their distinct appearance. I've tried to do this in mdx and there's just no easy way. I've also tried various ways in t-sql to achive, includeing ranking functions, custom udf, etc. To no avail.
The original dataset would look like this.
date, member_id, action
1/1/2008, 123, register
1/2/2008, 123, create_item_a
1/3/2008, 123, create_item_b
1/4/2008, 123, create_item_a
1/5/2008, 123, create_item_c
1/6/2008, 123, create_item_b
I need another column that flags the action in order of appearance, like so
date, member_id, action, appearance_rank
1/1/2008, 123, register, 1
1/2/2008, 123, create_item_a, 2
1/3/2008, 123, create_item_b, 3
1/4/2008, 123, create_item_a,2
1/5/2008, 123, create_item_c,4
1/6/2008, 123, create_item_b,3
So the "register" action would be the first thing a user did, "create_item_a" the second, create_item_b the third. However, the next occurrance of create_item_a would still retain the rank of 2 as it's not a new action for this user. The ranks would be unique to the actions, based on the first time they occurred.
This has been perplexing, but I feel like there is simple way to do this using some of the ranking functions, but just haven't been able to get it figure out.
Any help would be appreciated.
Regards...
Hi,I am using MS SQL server 2005 and wondering how to sort my results by rank using FREETEXT on multiple columns. Is there a way to do this? My two colums are:title and description
can anyone give any code snippets?
I have a DB with items which can have lengths from 0 to 400 meter.In my resultset I want to show the items with length 1-400 meter and then the results with length 0 meterHow to build my SQL?
View 4 Replies View RelatedLets say I have a table named [Leadership] and I want to select the field 'leadershipName' from the [Leadership] Table.
My query would look something like this:
Select leadershipName
From Leadership
Now, I would like to order the results of this query... but I don't want to simply order them by ASC or DESC. Instead, I need to order them as follows:
Executive Board Members, Delegates, Grievance Chairs, and Negotiators
My question: Can this be done through MS SQL or do I need to add a field to my [Leadership] table named 'leadershipImportance' or something as an integer to denote the level of importance of the position so that I can order on that value ASC or DESC?
Thanks,
Zoop
I have the following query and I am wanting to get the results to be in order. Right now, it shows me the results by date, but the dates are out of order. How can I get it to give me the results by date in date order???
SELECT DISTINCT MDN, dateadd(day, datediff(day, 0, CallDate), 0) as CallDate,sum(PaidBalCost), sum(BonusBalCost), sum(ceiling((Cast(DurationSeconds as Decimal)/60))) as Minutes
FROM VoiceCallDetailRecord
WHERE CallDate >= '02/19/2007' and calldate < '03/19/2007'
and NOT (Left(Endpoint,3) IN ('011')
or (Left(Endpoint,4) IN ('1340','1876','1868','1809',
'1246','1242','1780','1403',
'1250','1604','1807','1519',
'1204','1506','1709','1867',
'1902','1705','1613','1416',
'1905','1902','1514','1450',
'1418','1819','1306','1867')))
AND (((CONVERT(varchar, CallDate, 108) Between '07:00:00' AND '20:59:59'))
AND DATEPART(weekday, CallDate) in (2,3,4,5,6))
Group By MDN, dateadd(day, datediff(day, 0, CallDate), 0)
UNION
SELECT DISTINCT MDN, dateadd(day, datediff(day, 0, CallDate), 0) as CallDate,sum(PaidBalCost), sum(BonusBalCost), sum(ceiling((Cast(DurationSeconds as Decimal)/60))) as Minutes
FROM ZeroChargeVCDRecord
WHERE CallDate >= '02/19/2007' and calldate < '03/19/2007'
and NOT (Left(Endpoint,3) IN ('011')
or (Left(Endpoint,4) IN ('1340','1876','1868','1809',
'1246','1242','1780','1403',
'1250','1604','1807','1519',
'1204','1506','1709','1867',
'1902','1705','1613','1416',
'1905','1902','1514','1450',
'1418','1819','1306','1867')))
AND (((CONVERT(varchar, CallDate, 108) Between '07:00:00' AND '20:59:59'))
AND DATEPART(weekday, CallDate) in (2,3,4,5,6))
Group By MDN, dateadd(day, datediff(day, 0, CallDate), 0)
HiI want to get the dateName of everything but I don't know how to sort them now. Like I have this:DateName(month,TimeDateStamp) As TimeDateStampWhat gets the dateName now I want to sort these so that they are in order.How do I do this?
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi there,I'm a little bit confused here. I the TOP 1 function with ORDER BY DESC to get the last id in my table but it doesn't seems to work.Here's an example:SELECT TOP 1 ID FROM Worksheet WHERE Style='302' AND Notes='Automatically created from m0851System.' AND Title='STD COST UPDATED FORM m0851System' ORDER BY ID DESCSELECT ID FROM Worksheet WHERE Style='302' AND Notes='Automatically created from m0851System.' AND Title='STD COST UPDATED FORM m0851System' ORDER BY ID ASCSo basically the first SELECT should return the last id value of the second query but it doesn't.The first query gives me that: 60721And the second one gives me that:60680606816068360684606856068660718607196072060721610506112261124So as you can see my TOP 1 ID ORDER BY ID DESC should gave me this result: 61124Am I missing something or... ?Please help me this is aleready in function so I have to fix it ASAP.Thank you, Regards,OR-THO
View 5 Replies View RelatedHello there,
I have two tables I selecting name using like with %string% from the two tables but I need to order the result comes from the two table:
1- the exact match for the search string come first from the two table.
2- and the partial match comes last after the exact match.
this is my DDL for the two tables :
USE [Northwind]
GO
/****** Object: Table [dbo].[Person] Script Date: 04/25/2008 14:33:24 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Person](
[PersonID] [int] NULL,
[Type] [char](10) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL,
[Name] [varchar](50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL,
[email] [varchar](50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
second table:
USE [Northwind]
GO
/****** Object: Table [dbo].[Members] Script Date: 04/25/2008 14:33:52 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Members](
[MemberID] [int] NULL,
[Type] [char](10) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL,
[Name] [varchar](50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL,
[Email] [varchar](50) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
and this my search query I have it in a stored Proc.
select *
from
(
SELECT PersonID, Type, Name, email
FROM Person
WHERE (Name LIKE '%'@Name'%')
union all
SELECT PersonID, Type, Name, email
From Members
WHERE (Name Like '%'@Name'%' )
) Y
Order by
Case[Name] when @Name Then 1 Else 2 End,
Case[Name] when 'm' Then 1 Else 2 End
Thank you for your time
Sms
I need to order my search results by relevance to the keywords entered by the user, how can i do that in sql ?
View 6 Replies View Relatedhi. i'm trying to order my results ascending by date except i'm getting some really weird output. my ouput resembles something like this:
oct 2
oct 3
sep 13
sep 21
sep 22
sep 30
aug 3
aug 5
aug 16
the data is stored in a date field. i use getdate when inserting the date to the database. is there a reason why the dates are showing up weird and not ordering appropriately? thanks for your help.
also, can you not search here any more? i keep getting timeout errors.
I am trying to Concatenate resulting classification names (X_DSC_CD_ABR below) in the following order (if the classification exists), separated by '/': WC/STD/LTD/FMLA/State/Military/Paid/Corporate/PFL/Other
Examples:
a. STD/FMLA
b. STD/LTD/FMLA/Other
Consider this SQL:SELECT my_field FROM my_table WHERE my_field IN ('value2', 'value1','value3')Simple enough, but is there anyway to specify that the result should beordered exactly like the "IN" clause states? So when this recordsetcomes back, I want it like this:my_field------------value2value1value3Possible?Deane
View 5 Replies View RelatedHi,
Sorry I have to post this here, but its sort of related to MS SQL anyway
I'm running a PHP system with MS Access. I need to order results in pages. (For those who are familiar with MySqL and Postgresql - I need the equivalent to LIMIT/OFFSET in MS Access).
I know I can "SELECT TOP 50" in my sql - so that solves the number of results per page.
But what about page 2,3,4..etc.... how do I select results from an offset?
There doesnt seem to be a solution for it
Thanks!
I have a simple example of what I am trying to do. Here is some code to make a quick table to demonstrate:
create table #students
(
lastname varchar(50)
,firstname varchar(50)
,address1 varchar(50)
[Code].....
I want to select all the records, and them them be in alphabetical order first by lastname, then by firstname, then by address. HOWEVER, and this is the tricky part, I want to group names together that have the same address. So, in this example, I want the results to be in this order:
HallC6309 N Olive
HallP6309 N Olive <---- grouped with the C record because they have the same address
HallE5488 W Catalina <---- back to alphabetical by first name
HallJ7222 N Cocopas
This one has been stumping me for several days. I can run a query thatreturns several different items from several different manufacturers,each with a ranking score. Each manufacturer can have any number ofitems:Item_Name Manufacturer rankItem 1 Manu_A 82Item 2 Manu_A 65Item 3 Manu_A 41Item 4 Manu_B 32Item 5 Manu_C 21Item 6 Manu_B 19However, I would like the records to be ordered so that the highestranking item is shown first, then the next highest item from adifferent manufacturer is shown second, then the next highest item froma third manufacturer is show, etc.:Item 1 Manu_A 82Item 4 Manu_B 32Item 5 Manu_C 21Item 2 Manu_A 65Item 6 Manu_B 19Item 3 Manu_A 41Does anyone have any thoughts on how to order the results in thisfashion?thanks,Matt Weiner
View 2 Replies View Related
Hi there
We have a web application (database) that uses one field called Application and another called TicketType.
When a user fills out a ticket they can choose up to 3 levels of this field.
Eg Application, Application2, Application3
Eg TicketType, TicketType2, TicketType3
The extra two levels not being compulsory.
I am using sql server 2005 // Reporting Services
My query is as below:
SELECT Ticket.TicketNumber, Ticket.CreatedDate, Application_2.ApplicationName AS Application, Application_1.ApplicationName AS [App 2],
Application.ApplicationName AS [App 3], TicketType_2.TicketTypeName AS Tickettype, TicketType_1.TicketTypeName AS [Type 2],
TicketType.TicketTypeName AS [Type 3], Ticket.Description, Company.CompanyName
FROM Ticket INNER JOIN
TicketType AS TicketType ON Ticket.TicketTypeID = TicketType.TicketTypeID LEFT OUTER JOIN
TicketType AS TicketType_1 ON TicketType.ParentTicketTypeID = TicketType_1.TicketTypeID LEFT OUTER JOIN
TicketType AS TicketType_2 ON TicketType_1.ParentTicketTypeID = TicketType_2.TicketTypeID INNER JOIN
Application AS Application ON Ticket.ApplicationID = Application.ApplicationID INNER JOIN
Company ON Application.CompanyID = Company.CompanyID FULL OUTER JOIN
Application AS Application_1 ON Application.ParentApplicationID = Application_1.ApplicationID FULL OUTER JOIN
Application AS Application_2 ON Application_1.ParentApplicationID = Application_2.ApplicationID
WHERE (Ticket.CreatedDate >= @StartDate)
ORDER BY Ticket.TicketNumber
End result looks like this:
Application
App 2
App 3
TicketType
Type 2
Type 3
Software
Internal Apps
proACT
SW Other
Office Issues
General
Application
Click Track server
Alert (App)
Service
Network
Other
Network Fault
Software
Internal Apps
Other
User Account
New
Hardware
Network
HW Fault
Application
Click Track server
Alert (App)
Disk space
Office Issues
General
proACT
Configuration
Deployment
Software
Server Software
SharePoint
SW Fault
App Failure (Function)
Software
Server Software
SharePoint
SW Fault
App Failure (Function)
Ultimately I would like the Application (TicketType) fields to have the Master Information in it and the other two fields populated in order as well.
Can someone help please.
Please ask if I haven't explained myself.
thanks
Dianne
I'm working with SQL Server 2005, and I'm trying to sort the results based on a user selected letter. Say the user selects 'D' to filter his results. I'd like to return the results starting from D followed by E, F, G...Z, A, B, C. What I'm getting is the results for the D entries at the top of the result set, followed by A, B, C, E...Z.
A solution comes to mind that would be very long and db intensive, by querying on 'like 'D', followed by like 'E', followed by like 'F', etc, but I'm sure that there is a much more efficient way to do this. Below is the code that I'm using now.
' where @SortString = 'd' and @Test is a temp Table
BEGIN
Insert into @Test
Select CompanyName,ContactId, CompanyId
from vContacts where CompanyName like @SortString +'%'
Order by CompanyName
Insert into @Test
Select CompanyName,ContactId, CompanyId
from vContacts where CompanyName not like @SortString +'%'
Order by CompanyName
END
Thanks in advance for your help
Hi,
MSSQL 2000 T-SQL
I have a problem in extracting information pertaing to a key value and matching that key value to another transaction but the order is based on another value in the same row.
I've attached a sample of DB data below.
tran_nr ret_ref_no msg_type description
5111 12345 420 reversal
5112 12345 200 auths
5113 15236 200 auths
5114 46587 200 auths
5115 46587 420 reversal
Requirement using the above data is to extract data where the ret_ref_no is the same for more than one row but also check that the msg_type 420 happens before the 200. Is there a way of retrieving the information in this way using the tran_nr coloumn values? The tran_nr values is basically the serial number when the transaction is wrriten away to the DB.
I've managed only to retrive the 1st half of my query whereby the same ret_ref_nr is being used by more then one transaction. Still need to figure out the 2nd part where the msg_type of 420 happens before the 200.
SELECT * FROM SAMPLE
WHERE ret_ref_no in
(
SELECT ret_ref_no FROM SAMPLE
GROUP BY ret_ref_no HAVING COUNT(*) > 1
)
Results of query
5111 12345 420 reversal
5112 12345 200 auths
5114 46587 200 auths
5115 46587 420 reversal
If someone could assist with only retreiving the above results in bold to the query analyser i will really appreciate it.
Regards
Deceptive
I have the follow table.
/****** Object: Table [dbo].[deletethisTempOut] Script Date: 09/10/2007 09:20:12 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[deletethisTempOut](
[ThemeName] [varchar](60) NULL,
[intLocationCount] [int] NULL,
[dblRepValueA] [float] NULL,
[dblRepValueB] [float] NULL,
[dblRepValueC] [float] NULL,
[dblRepValueD] [float] NULL,
[dblTotalRepValue] [float] NULL,
[dblLimit1] [float] NULL,
[dblLimit2] [float] NULL,
[dblLimit3] [float] NULL,
[dblLimit4] [float] NULL,
[dblTotalLimit] [float] NULL,
[fltEmployeecount] [float] NULL,
[intAreaLevel1] [tinyint] NOT NULL,
[strFullName] [varchar](13) NOT NULL,
[strAreaLevel2] [varchar](20) NOT NULL,
[strAreaLevel3] [varchar](20) NOT NULL
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
If I use the following SQL:
SELECT ThemeName, intLocationCount, dblRepValueA, dblRepValueB, dblRepValueC, dblRepValueD, dblTotalRepValue, dblLimit1, dblLimit2, dblLimit3,
dblLimit4, dblTotalLimit, fltEmployeecount, intAreaLevel1, strFullName, strAreaLevel2, strAreaLevel3
FROM deletethisTempOut
ORDER BY strAreaLevel2, strAreaLevel3
GET Following correct results:
Adair
284
899989594
0
574857716
190479902
1665327212
0
0
0
0
1665327212
0
1
United States
1
1
IF I use the following SQL I get the wrong results:
SELECT ThemeName, intLocationCount, dblRepValueA, dblRepValueB, dblRepValueC, dblRepValueD, dblTotalRepValue, dblLimit1, dblLimit2, dblLimit3,
dblLimit4, dblTotalLimit, fltEmployeecount, intAreaLevel1, strFullName, strAreaLevel2, strAreaLevel3
FROM deletethisTempOut
ORDER BY ThemeName
WRONG results:
Adair
74
81733110
0
49616018
24671651
156020779
50510500
0
0
0
203870779
0
1
United States
50
1
Adair
437
1468698657
0
495479839
353202768
2317381264
12984266
0
0
0
2315676030
0
1
United States
25
1
Adair
1813
20309722045
0
6597005374
4253819645
31160547064
43636703
0
0
0
31135010742
0
1
United States
11
1
Adair
606
439581417
0
331746662
132240332
903568411
0
0
0
0
903568411
0
1
United States
45
1
Adair
236
350256381
0
524269553
504973831
1379499765
4080368
0
0
0
1380473415
0
1
United States
23
1etc.....
Hi!
Has anyone experienced this problem?
Certain queries that work fine in SQL 6.5 and Oracle return inconsistent / inaccurate results in SQL 7 (with SP1). These queries include an IN clause with a range of values.
For example, the following query:
SELECT columnA, columnB, columnC, columnD
FROM table
WHERE columnD = 'I'
AND columnA IN (1,2,3,11,19)
go
returns a different result than this query:
SELECT columnA, columnB, columnC, columnD
FROM table
WHERE columnD = 'I'
AND columnA IN (1,3,11,2,19)
go
The only way we have stumbled upon to get accurate results consistently is to order the range values from largest to smallest:
AND columnA IN (19,11,3,2,1)
Have not seen this documented anywhere. We are in the process of re-ordering these ranges in our code, but I welcome any ideas or comments...
Thanks!
I am attempting to sort the results of a query executed against a table variable in descending order. The data is being inserted into the table variable as expected, however when I attempt to order the results in descending order, the results are incorrect. I have included the code as well as the result set.
DECLARE @tblCustomRange AS TABLE
(
RecordID INTEGER IDENTITY(1,1),
RangeMonth INTEGER,
RangeDay INTEGER
)
DECLARE @Month INTEGER
DECLARE @Day INTEGER
-- Initialize month and day variables.
SET @Month = 8
SET @Day = 11
-- Insert records into the table variable.
INSERT INTO @tblCustomRange
(RangeMonth, RangeDay) VALUES (1,2)
INSERT INTO @tblCustomRange
(RangeMonth, RangeDay) VALUES (1,27)
INSERT INTO @tblCustomRange
(RangeMonth, RangeDay) VALUES (6,10)
INSERT INTO @tblCustomRange
(RangeMonth, RangeDay) VALUES (9,22)
INSERT INTO @tblCustomRange
(RangeMonth, RangeDay) VALUES (12,16)
-- Select everything from the table variable ordering the results by month, day in
-- descending order
SELECT * FROM @tblCustomRange
WHERE (RangeMonth < @Month) OR
(RangeMonth = @Month AND RangeDay <= @Day)
ORDER BY RangeMonth, RangeDay DESC
I am getting the following resultset:
RecordID RangeMonth RangeDay
----------- ----------- -----------
2 1 27
1 1 2
3 6 10
I am expecting the following resultset:
RecordID RangeMonth RangeDay
----------- ----------- -----------
3 6 10
2 1 27
1 1 2
Trying to build a list of order numbers based on stock availability.
The data looks something like this:
OrderNumber Stockcode quantityordered quantityinstock
123 code1 10 5
123 code2 5 10
124 code3 15 20
124 code4 10 10
In this case I would like to output a single result for each order, but based on stock availability order 123 is not a complete order and 124 is so the results will need to reflect this.
Hi,
Why adidas is better-ranked than nike??
Table "indice":
idcCod fabCod mcaCod catCod fabNom mcaNom catNom
1111NikeNikeRopa
2221AdidasAdidasRopa
3113NikeNikeMedias
4118NikeNikeLargas
SELECT[RANK] ,[KEY],idc.*
FROMFREETEXTTABL (dbo.indice,mcaNombre,fabNombre,catNombre),
'ropa adidas nike',
LANGUAGE 3082, 5) res left join
dbo.indice idc with (nolock) on idc.idcCodigo=res.[key]
ORDER BY [RANK] DESC;
Result:
RANK KEY
182
03
04
01
Why idcCods's 1 and 2 have different rank??
because idcCod's 3 and 4 affects ?? or it's just thinks of language??
Thank's in advance
Ok. Im not able to understand this logic please help. As you can see we have 2 columns of ranks, 1)normal 2)corrective. what is the logic behind this and how do u write a query for this? these ranks are for the Salary Column.
Imran,
"You truly do not know someone untill you fight them."-THE MATRIX.
EmpID Empname EmpSalary RankNormal RankCorrective
1 A 150001 1
2 B 100002 4
3 C 150001 1
4 D 40003 5
5 E 150001 1
6 F 15004 6
7 G 15004 6
8 H 5005 8
I have table :
Result1 Rank
5
6
78
4
27
3
How to rank in above table ?
Thank you very much !
Hi All,
Please let me know the equivalent of RANK() over ( order by...)
in SQL server 2000.
I thought this was supported in SQL server 2000.
Please let me know if there exists a user defined function.
Thanks in Advance.
Thanks
I would like to write a query that gives me the values of a set ofobservations, and their rank.CREATE TABLE #Values(val int)INSERT #Values SELECT 1INSERT #Values SELECT 5INSERT #Values SELECT 10I would like to select this:1 10 -- rank 1, value 102 53 1I can put them into a temp table with an identity column, ordered bythe column I'm interested in, and then retrieve in order by theidentity column. I'm wondering if there's a way to do that with asubquery.Thanks,Jim
View 3 Replies View RelatedI've written a bunch of code using contains for fts. Then as I was trying to run the sorting, I realized that I have to use containstable in order to sort by rank. Is that correct? When I was using contains, I just used it as a where clause so I would have something like...
WHERE ((PostedUntil >= '5/22/2006') AND (SiteId=199)) AND (CONTAINS (PositionTitle, '"sales"') OR CONTAINS (Description, '"sales"'))
From the examples I've seen, in order to use containstable, I have to join a new dynamic table to the freetext enabled table and it only uses 1 containstable phrase for the new table. In my case, I may have multiple containstable phrases, so would they all fall in a () set like..
FROM Categories AS FT_TBL INNER JOIN
(CONTAINSTABLE (table, col1, searchphrase) OR (CONTAINSTABLE(table, col2, searchphrase2) OR CONTAINSTABLE (table, col3, searchphrase3)) AS KEY_TBL
... or would each containstable have to be a new join? I don't want to spend anymore time going back and rewriting code just to test it since it's about a days worth of recoding. Thanks.
ive created a photo sharing site, and im trying to show the statisics for certain users, so far i can COUNT all the photos the user has upload, and show them in descending order, but i need to be able to see the ranking of the user, like :
RANK USERID No. Of Photos
1 10 100
2 8 70
3 9 85
is there anyway of doing this? thanks Si!
My data:
Code:
CUST NO | StoreName| Rank
Cust1 0781 1
Cust1 0246 2
Cust1 0481 3
Cust2 2101 1
Cust2 8876 2
Cust2 5445 3
Cust3 3243 1
Cust3 4545 2
Cust3 3223 3
Im trying to find a way to rank as shown in the third column.
This is the code im using:
Code:
SELECT top 100 (CustomerNo)as CustomerNo, StoreName,
(SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT CustomerNo)
FROM dbo.Top3CustomerNoStores AS O2
WHERE O2.CustomerNo < O1.CustomerNo) + 1 AS drnk
FROM Top3CustomerNoStores as O1
... and getting this result
Code:
CUST NO | StoreName| drnk
Cust1 0781 1
Cust1 0246 1
Cust1 0481 1
Cust2 2101 2
Cust2 8876 2
Cust2 5445 2
Cust3 3243 3
Cust3 4545 3
Cust3 3223 3
... and using this code
Code:
SELECT top 100 (CustomerNo)as CustomerNo, StoreName,
(SELECT COUNT(*)
FROM dbo.Orders AS O2
WHERE O2.qty < O1.qty) + 1 AS rnk
.... which gives me ...
Code:
CUST NO | StoreName| rnk
Cust1 0781 1
Cust1 0246 1
Cust1 0481 1
Cust2 2101 4
Cust2 8876 4
Cust2 5445 4
Cust3 3243 7
Cust3 4545 7
Cust3 3223 7
I have noticed in SQL 2005, this is accomplished much easier with built in functions.
any help appreciated