I am trying to do a simple SQL query..the result will be sorted alphabetically by default, but i need to specify say, if there is a "Others" it will be placed last in the list. Is there any way to write the query using ORDER BY?
e.g
Australia
China
Others
USA
and i want it to be:
Australia
CHina
USA
OThers
I have a query that pulls records from a table based on whether is matches one or more of several criteria. I'd like to be able to order the results of this query by the number of conditions a particular row met. So a row that met 3 conditions would rank about a row that only met 2. So far I haven't been able to dent this with any attempt so I'm open to any suggestions.
View 5 Replies View RelatedConsider this SQL:SELECT my_field FROM my_table WHERE my_field IN ('value2', 'value1','value3')Simple enough, but is there anyway to specify that the result should beordered exactly like the "IN" clause states? So when this recordsetcomes back, I want it like this:my_field------------value2value1value3Possible?Deane
View 5 Replies View RelatedI've been trying to find out why a simple query containing a couple of top-level order bys produces different results when I introduce TOP into the query. I've found nothing so far, other than the results of both queries (TOP and non-TOP) are different again if I add an index.
All the DDL and DML is below, along with the results. The database uses the BIN2 collator.
I guess there's a simple explanation for this...
DROP table employeeCREATE TABLE employee( id INTEGER IDENTITY (1, 1) NOT NULL, givenname NVARCHAR (20), familyname NVARCHAR (20), CONSTRAINT pk_employee_id PRIMARY KEY (id));insert into employee values('John', 'Smith');insert into employee values('John', 'SMITH');insert into employee values('John', 'Smyth');insert into employee values('John', 'SMYTH');goselect top 10 givenname, familynamefrom employee order by lower(familyname) asc, lower(givenname) ascgo-- Dropping top produces results in different order!select givenname, familynamefrom employee order by lower(familyname) asc, lower(givenname) ascgo-- Creating an index results in different order on both queries!CREATE INDEX idx_employee_names ON employee (familyname, givenname);goselect top 10 givenname, familynamefrom employee order by lower(familyname) asc, lower(givenname) ascgoselect givenname, familynamefrom employee order by lower(familyname) asc, lower(givenname) ascgo
This produces the following results:
givenname familyname
-------------------- --------------------
John SMITH
John Smith
John SMYTH
John Smyth
(4 rows affected)
givenname familyname
-------------------- --------------------
John Smith
John SMITH
John Smyth
John SMYTH
(4 rows affected)
givenname familyname
-------------------- --------------------
John Smith
John SMITH
John Smyth
John SMYTH
(4 rows affected)
givenname familyname
-------------------- --------------------
John SMITH
John Smith
John Smyth
John SMYTH
Hi there!
We are experiencing a problem using order clause in the statement below:
SELECT
person.pkey
, first_name
FROM
person
, private_person
WHERE
fkey_person = person.pkey
AND first_name = 'A'
ORDER BY
first_name
, person.pkey
Where person table contains the following columns:
pkey, name etc
and private_person
pkey, fkey_person (indexed), first_name (indexed)
The output is:
STEP 1
The type of query is SELECT
FROM TABLE
private_person
Nested iteration
Index : i$private_person$first_name
FROM TABLE
person
Nested iteration
Using Clustered Index
pkey first_name
----------- ---------------------
2000512 A
10994 A
2299 A
1097 A
1218 A
5133 A
1329 A
1387 A
1465 A
7532 A
5513 A
1884 A
512 A
591 A
(14 row(s) affected)
STEP 1
The type of query is SETOFF
Why SQL server does not order by pkey? Is there any information about it somewhere? Is it a bug or what?
If we are ordering by fkey_person everything is Ok. Can anybody help?
Thanks a lot!
Kind Regards,
Vladimir
I have a table named as C1_Messages with fields Id, Messages, Dates.
My Id filed looks like this:
1000
1001
1008
1009
1084
1093
1098 etc.
But here I need to make these Ids in a order, means it sould be in a consecutive order. Like
1000
1001
1002
1003
1004
1005 etc.
So is there anyway to do this method in SQL?
Regards
Shaji
Hello,
I have made sql table called costreallocation consists of two columsn:
RuleID varchar(10)
Type varchar(20)
I run the following three queries:
insert into costreallocation(RuleId,Type)values('aa','a')
insert into costreallocation(RuleId,Type)values('dd','d')
insert into costreallocation(RuleId,Type)values('cc','a')
then when i notice that these three records are not inserted as they are run:
In the table thn there are three records :
aa a
cc d
dd d
but i need to be filled in the table as they run as:
aa a
dd d
cc d
your help is highly appreciated
Best regards
I have an int field - that will hold number for an ordering system. It's a databound field to a textbox in a grid, I want the default to be empty, however not all fields are required so i may have 1-6 as bound values, and the rest should fall in line behind them - the only thing i can think of to do is default the values to 9999 so they come after 1,2,3,4,5,6 etc... I don't like seeing 9999 in my bound fields.
thanks for any suggestions you may have.
Jeff
Hello.
I want to order a resultset from a table by two columns in another table. Here's how it looks:
[Books]
ID
Title
[linkBookAuthor]
BookID (Books.ID)
AuthorID (Authors.ID)
[Authors]
ID
Firstname
Lastname
AuthorOrder
As you can see it's a many to many relationship. Is there a way to order the books by Authors.Lastname (the first if there are several authors) with one query ? If not, what is the fastest way ? I don't need the names in the resultset so I only want to order the books by Authors.Lastname, not include Authors.Lastname.
Thanks for any help.
Hiya!
I've got a little stored procedure:
CREATE PROCEDURE rICDCode @param1 char(15) = 'Description'
AS
SELECT DiagCode, ICD9ID, Description
FROM ICDCodes
ORDER BY @param1
and SQL is returning error 1008 - "The SELECT item identified by the ORDER BY number %d contains a variable as part of the expression identifying a column position. Variables are only allowed when ordering by an expression referencing a column name."
I want to be able to use the same stored procedure for several different functions which all need the same rowset sorted differently. Any way to do this?
Thanks,
Sarah
Hi guys.
I want to create a top 20 product list from a few thousand products. I want the rest of the products to be grouped into 'others'...
I also want the products to be ordered by the facts in the cube. Thus the product dimension would dynamically change depending on the Time dimension thats being selected.
is this plausible ?
Thanks
Tom
Is it possible without using CASE statements, to order a result set by one field (if the second field return value is null) or another (if the second field return value is not null)
This would be on datetime fields.
Let's say I have 5 records with 2 date fields
sched_dt and arriv_dt.
sched_dt will always have a value, arriv_dt may or may not have a value.
In a single result set I would like to have the records with an arriv_dt sorted by arriv_dt and the ones without an arriv_dt sorted by sched_dt.
*Hope that makes sense*
Thanks
I have a table that has 4 dates for each record (birthday, anniversary, policy_start & policy_end). What I want to do is cycle through each record and then do some calculations using the gaps between the dates. So it
might be Calc1 using (birthday->anniversary), Calc2(anniverary->policy_start), Calc3(policy_start->policy_end), etc. BUT the dates might be in different orders (ie the birthday could come first - or the anniverary could, etc).
In VBA in Excel, I can use the SMALL function within my calcs and this returns the minimum date, the next smallest, the next & then the biggest. But how can I do this in SQL. I guess I can push the 4 dates out to a temp table, order it and then suck them back in - but I have no idea how to do this for all the records in my primary table
I've also tried using various WHERE statements (ie do Calc1 using Birthday & Anniversary WHERE Birthday < Anniversary and ........ - but the code gets awfully long.
Is it possible to write my own SMALL function which uses a bubble sort on the 4 dates & then returns the smallest, next smallest, etc
Any thoughts ?
Hi all,
Ive got a table with a field called 'morder' which orders a menu based on the values in this field (1 for position 1, 2 for position 2 etc...) for example
1 - menu item 1
2 - menu item 2
3 - menu item 3
4 - menu item 4
If I want to add a record to this table and put it at number 2 in the list, i need to update the table to then read...
1 - menu item 1
2 - NEW menu item 2
3 - menu item 2
4 - menu item 3
5 - menu item 4
I want to use a mssql or php function to re-order this field... is it possible??
Hope you can help, and hope it makes sense...
Ash
Hi, I was wondering, I have several columns of data that are able to be sorted on - the user just clicks on the column name. However, we have 1 column called order status where we don't want the order to be alphabetical (and it is a text field - a couple current possible values are Processing...In Production...Waiting For Approval). This order is not good for logical sorting - we would want to be able to specify what value would get order. Does that make sense? So we would want to be able to say that Processing is first in the display, Waiting For Approval would be next, then In Production would be next, and so on. Is there any possible way of doing this in a SQL query? Or am I going to have to manually modify all the data adding numbers to the beginning of each data so that it will sort on the numbers? Thanks everyone.
View 4 Replies View Relatedi add new column using alter command but i always found it in the end of table but
i want to add it in particular position between the columns...........
how to do so .............:)
Hi,I'm streaming data monitoring histories of components into a database table with the following three columns: Hour (DateTime), Id (Int64), and Value (Int32). The Value entry is an aggregate of all values sent from component Id during, and 59 minutes and 59 seconds after, the time listed in the Hour column.I had rather not have to sort the queries after pulling them from the database by date. So I tried to index the DB by the Hour column. Any column will inevitably have duplicates, since the uniqueness depends on a combination of Hour and PortId. But Indexing the Hour column doesn't result in INSERTs being in order as I had expected. Instead, every entry is listed in order of insertion.So. . .how can I keep such a table ordered by date on the disk? I'm afraid this will become very inefficient if this isn't nipped in the bud right now.Thanks so much for your help!-Brandon
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a little query that returns me all the days in a month, but the days are not in the order I need. They come out like so..
January 10
January 11
January 12
January 13
January 14
etc
January 19
January 2
January 20
January 21
January 22
here is my sample code
select [month] + ' ' + [day] as [Date] from mytable
where [month] = 'january'
and [year] = '2004'
Thanks, Jeff
I am wondering if someone maybe able to help me, I am needing to order my data via months in the calendar sense not alphabetically, below is what I currently have, but it only does it alphabetically.
select to_char(created,'yyyy-Mon'), matdesc, count(*)
from test
group by to_char(created,'yyyy-Mon'), matdesc
order by to_char(created,'yyyy-Mon') desc
any help would be greatly appreciated
Thank you
Stephen
Hi all,
Ive got a bit of a problem,
I have two tables:
CATEGORY
id
name
parent_CATEGORY_id
RECORD
id
CATEGORY_id
Stock_Held_Number
ps. Ive stripped out any non relevant fields
I also have the following query (again ive stripped out the non-relevant fields)
SELECT TOP (100) PERCENT SUM(dbo.RECORD.Stock_Held_Number) AS TotalStock, CATEGORY.Name AS FundName
FROM CATEGORY
LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.RECORD ON CATEGORY.ID = dbo.RECORD.CATEGORY_id
GROUP BY CATEGORY.Name, RECORD.Stock_Held_Number
At the moment its grouping all the CATEGORIES and giving me a sum total for each which is great.
The problem I have is the CATEGORY table, there is an optional join to parent CATEGORY records on the table.
What Im trying to do is to provide a fully ordered result within the CATEGORIES and I don't have a clue.
For example:
The CATEGORY table has the following values
ID Name Parent_Category_id
1 Pens
2 Animals
3 Rocks
4 Horses 2
5 Dogs 2
When I currently run the query I get:
Name TotalStock
Pens 20
Animals 30
Rocks 40
Horses 50
Dogs 60
It's technically correct because I don't want the parent to calculate the total value of the children
What Im really trying to do is order them within the hierarchy though and indent (if possible) the result so I would get
Name TotalStock
Animals 30
---Dogs 60
---Horses 50
Pens 20
Rocks 40
Does anybody have any pointers as to how I can achieve this.
Many thanks
Mike
hi,
i have following data:
create table tb_customer (customer_id int, order_id varchar (12))
insert into tb_customer (customer_id, order_id) values (123, 2201)
insert into tb_customer (customer_id, order_id) values (123, 2246)
insert into tb_customer (customer_id, order_id) values (123, 2236)
insert into tb_customer (customer_id, order_id) values (123, 1253)
insert into tb_customer (customer_id, order_id) values (120, 1201)
insert into tb_customer (customer_id, order_id) values (127, 2251)
insert into tb_customer (customer_id, order_id) values (127, 2231)
insert into tb_customer (customer_id, order_id) values (122, 2121)
and i want to get the following output:
output:
Nu_order | customer_id| order_id
1 |123| 2201
2 |123| 2246
3 |123| 2236
4 |123| 1253
1 |120| 1201
1 |127| 2251
2 |127| 2231
1 |122| 2121
any idea?
thank you
Having recently had excellent service here (many thanks, Erland!),here's another wee problem.SQL 2000I need to get a report which will display the movement of people thus:ID DIRECTION NAME DATE VEHICLE REGISTRATIONThe value of DIRECTION can be either "Inbound" or "Outbound"I need to have the data grouped by ID, with the "Outbound" row first.For example1 "Outbound" Smith 10/02/2005 ABC1231 "Inbound" Smith 11/02/2005 ABC1235 "Outbound" Jones 14/02/2005 XYZ7895 "Inbound" Jones 15/02/2005 DEF456This is the SQL so far.SELECTfldPersonID,tblMovementType.fldType AS [MovementType],'Outbound' AS [Direction],fldMovementDate AS [Date],CASE WHEN tblPerson.fldForenames IS NULLTHEN fldSurnameELSE fldSurname + ', ' + fldForenames END AS [Name],'Outbound ' + fldVehicleOut AS VehicleRegistrationFROMtblPersonINNER JOIN tblMovementTypeON tblMovementType.fldMovementTypeID = tblPerson.fldMovementTypeWHERE((fldMovementDate BETWEEN @FromDate AND @ToDate) AND(fldStatus = 1))UNION ALLSELECTfldPersonID,tblMovementType.fldType AS [MovementType],'Inbound' AS [Direction],fldMovementDate AS [Date],CASE WHEN tblPerson.fldForenames IS NULLTHEN fldSurnameELSE fldSurname + ', ' + fldForenames END AS [Name],'Inbound '+ fldVehicleRtn AS VehicleRegistrationFROMtblPersonINNER JOIN tblMovementTypeON tblMovementType.fldMovementTypeID = tblPerson.fldMovementTypeWHERE((fldMovementDate BETWEEN @FromDate AND @ToDate) AND(fldStatus = 1))What I need is the way to Order or Group it so that I can just put therows into a report without any grouping on the report itself (CrystalReports aarrggh!) - if this is possible!Edward--The reading group's reading group:http://www.bookgroup.org.ukThanks
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi everyone, I have a database (not designed by me) in sql server, I amhaving trouble ordering it correctly, and I would appreciate any help.Here is my structure, it's sort of hierarchical:TABLE_AID_COLSUB_ID_COLTABLE_BID_COL'NAMEThis could be thought of as an employee and supervisor structure. Wehave employees (TABLE_B) and their relationship (TABLE_A).I know I need to use a group and oder by, but I am drawing blankstoday. I need the result to be (if using the employee example):Bob-Ryan-SueMarkNick-George-Paul--Ringo--StarHere is my half-hearted stab at it:SELECT *FROM TABLE_A AINNER JOIN TABLE_B BGROUP BY A.SUB_ID_COLORDER BY NAME;Thank you very much for any help you can offer.Have a great night!Ryan
View 4 Replies View RelatedI've created a clustered two column index on a table where the secondcolumn is an integer value. When the first column is the same, insteadof ordering in numerical order it is ordering 1,10,100,2,20,200 etc.How can I change the behaviour to order the data in numerical order?Thanks,Rick
View 9 Replies View RelatedHOW TO ORDER THIS DATA.MONTH-YEAR10-200310-202011-20033 -20034 -20035 -20036 -20037 -20038 -20039 -2003THANX IN ADV.Join Bytes!
View 2 Replies View RelatedHow I can ordering data in SQL EE by VB 2005 EE.
Thanks.
When I am receiving a batch of message from a queue to process, does it matter if I order by the queuing_order or the message_sequence_number? I want to make sure my messages process in the order in which they were put into the queue, which I know will happen if I process messages one-by-one, but want to make sure that the data I pull and process execute in the order in which they were received.
Tim
Hello,
I'm attempting to run three separate queries and have them returned as one recordset. I need to show the top 10 customers based on the number of orders they placed for each of three months, then combine them to give a representation of which customers have been within the monthly top 10 for the overall period of three months. My problem is when I run a count on the number of orders they have placed and order by that count, it is in ascending order which in escence shows me the bottom 10, not the top 10. To resolve this issue, I can specify descending order. This works fine with one query, but when I run all three queries using union statements, I can only have one order by which returns incorrect results. Here is my query. In this example, I get the combination of the three recordsets as expected, but each of the individual queries is not ordering descending, so I get the wrong end of the table. I am not bound to union, but do not know where to go. I do not believe I can use joins or concatenate queries because I have multiple where clauses. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Please note that I am using a view to convert the cryptic field names which are used by a third party software tool into more friendly names. We will call this view Friendly_View for this example.
USE MyDB
SELECT TOP 10 CustName, Location, Phone, COUNT(Orders) AS TotalOrders
FROM Friendly_View
WHERE MONTH([Order Date]) = MONTH(GETDATE())-1 AND YEAR([Order Date]) = YEAR(GETDATE())
GROUP BY CustName, Location, Phone
UNION
SELECT TOP 10 CustName, Location, Phone, COUNT(Orders) AS TotalOrders
FROM Friendly_View
WHERE MONTH([Order Date]) = MONTH(GETDATE())-2 AND YEAR([Order Date]) = YEAR(GETDATE())
GROUP BY CustName, Location, Phone
UNION
SELECT TOP 10 CustName, Location, Phone, COUNT(Orders) AS TotalOrders
FROM Friendly_View
WHERE MONTH([Order Date]) = MONTH(GETDATE())-3 AND YEAR([Order Date]) = YEAR(GETDATE())
GROUP BY CustName, Location, Phone
ORDER BY COUNT(Orders) DESC
Does anyone know in what order files are processed if using a for each container and file enumerator? Does it sort files alphabetically and loop through? Or use a date time stamp? Or something else? I need files to be processed in a certain order, and the ordering is in the filename, so the foreach file enumerator sorts on filename, then I'm ok, otherwise I need to figure something else out. Thanks.
View 5 Replies View RelatedSELECT LEFT(CONVERT(CHAR(11),convert(datetime,task_date),109),3) + ' ' + RIGHT(CONVERT(CHAR(11),convert(datetime,task_date),109),4) as Date,
SUM(CASE a.status_id WHEN 1000 THEN b.act_point ELSE 0 END) as Programming,
SUM(CASE a.status_id WHEN 1016 THEN b.act_point ELSE 0 END) as Design,
SUM(CASE a.status_id WHEN 1752 THEN b.act_point ELSE 0 END) as Upload,
SUM(CASE a.status_id WHEN 1032 THEN b.act_point ELSE 0 END) as Testing,
SUM(CASE a.status_id WHEN 1128 THEN b.act_point ELSE 0 END) as Meeting,
SUM(CASE a.status_id WHEN 1172 THEN b.act_point ELSE 0 END) as Others
From task_table a,act_table b where a.status_id=b.act_id and a.user_id=(select user_id from user_table where user_name='Raghu') and a.task_date like '%/%/2006'
GROUP BY
LEFT(CONVERT(CHAR(11),convert(datetime,task_date),109),3) + ' ' + RIGHT(CONVERT(CHAR(11),convert(datetime,task_date),109),4)
Output :
Aug 2006 294 0 0 80 0 0
Jan 2006 14 0 0 0 0 0
Oct 2006 336 0 0 0 0 0
Sep 2006 3262 20 24 8 16 0
How to sort the date in ascending Order ?
Jan 2006
Aug 2006
Sep 2006
Oct 2006
hi, i'm using a similar code for a recursive relationship in sql server
written @
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/articles/sql_server_recursion_with_clause.asp.i'm using the Table of Contents Hierarchy code in the article.
However, instead of ordering by the sort order, i'm using the TOC
instead. My problem is, i know TOC is of varchar type, therefore, if
the sort order has an integer of more than 10, the order sequence would
be 1.01.11.101.111.2etc.so how do i make it so that it is1.01.11.21.3......1.10 instead? Thank you
Hi frnds,
i need a help from all of u.
i will tell whats it ------ i have a webpage creating using ASP.NET,C# using SQL server 2000.
i have a table in the database which has attribute named "Priority" which has values like "High" "Low" "Medium". all i wana to make is that i enter any of this value tru a dropdown list into the database and i have used Datalist in Webpage so that i will retrieve back the info from the database.
when any request is made to retrieve back this value . i want to see all the priority field in the datalist which has priority as "High" in bold and in order. is this possible ,if it is plz let me know
thank u in advance
sunilk
Hello,
I am trying to solve this....when I run this query
select convert(varchar,date,100) from temp3
where date between convert(varchar,getdate() - 1.0,101) and
convert(varchar,getdate(),101)
result is:
Apr 19 2000 12:45PM
Apr 19 2000 12:46PM
Apr 19 2000 12:47PM
Apr 19 2000 12:48PM
Apr 19 2000 12:49PM
Apr 19 2000 12:49PM
Apr 19 2000 12:52PM
Apr 19 2000 12:53PM
Apr 19 2000 12:56PM
Apr 19 2000 12:57PM
Apr 19 2000 12:57PM
Apr 19 2000 12:58PM
Apr 19 2000 12:59PM
Apr 19 2000 12:59PM
Apr 19 2000 12:59PM
Apr 19 2000 12:59PM
Apr 19 2000 1:00PM
Apr 19 2000 1:01PM
Apr 19 2000 1:02PM
Apr 19 2000 1:02PM
Apr 19 2000 1:03PM
Apr 19 2000 1:04PM
Apr 19 2000 1:05PM
Apr 19 2000 1:06PM
Apr 19 2000 1:06PM
Apr 19 2000 1:10PM
Apr 19 2000 1:11PM
Apr 19 2000 1:11PM
this is what I am expecting. but when I try to group it
select convert(varchar,date,100) from temp3
where date between convert(varchar,getdate() - 1.0,101) and
convert(varchar,getdate(),101)
group by convert(varchar,date,100)
result is:
Apr 19 2000 1:00PM
Apr 19 2000 1:01PM
Apr 19 2000 1:02PM
Apr 19 2000 1:03PM
Apr 19 2000 1:04PM
Apr 19 2000 1:05PM
Apr 19 2000 1:06PM
Apr 19 2000 1:10PM
Apr 19 2000 1:11PM
Apr 19 2000 12:45PM
Apr 19 2000 12:46PM
Apr 19 2000 12:47PM
Apr 19 2000 12:48PM
Apr 19 2000 12:49PM
Apr 19 2000 12:52PM
Apr 19 2000 12:53PM
Apr 19 2000 12:56PM
Apr 19 2000 12:57PM
Apr 19 2000 12:58PM
Apr 19 2000 12:59PM
result is correct but I would like it to be displayed like
the first one. I will really appreciate Any clues,
suggestions, How to at this point. Thanks a lot.
HP