Pagination And Interactive Sort For Drilldown Report Doesn't Work Fine
Jul 2, 2007
Hi Anyone,
I have a drilldown report includes three groups. I add the last group for pagination. But the details in each page doesn't accord to I specified and the detail record number is different in different page.
Another issue is the interactive sort always sort in the first page scope. I set the data region or grouping to the table, and evaluate expression scrope to Detail scope.
works fine in designer but when i load the report services I get the following error anybody know what to do there is one subreport with this report maybe the passing value but what could be wrong ????
Item has already been added. Key in dictionary: '9' Key being added: '9'
I can't get interactive sort to work on Report Server reports (but it works on reports I've done in Report Builder using one table per report). I tried it on a different database in a Report Server report and it did work.
There was another post that talked about the collation, which is Latin1_General_CI_AS_KS_WS for the ReportServer and ReportServerTempDB, and SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS for the two databases I reported on. But it seems like I'm not doing something correctly since it works in RB but not RS (though the one database report did work).
I have a subreport that has interactive sort on one of the columns in a table. The interactive sort works well when i run the subreport. But when i run the parent report that contains the subreport then the interactive sorting does not work.
Has anyone come across this issue, any help will be greatly appreciated.
I have many jobs on sql 05 and all work but one. This one writes to an Access DB on the same server as SQL. The package works fine. But when executed in the context of the SQL Agent job, it fails.
Jobs that write to a text file work fine. The Access DB has no password required. By the way, that job in sql 2000 worked fine.
I have the following query which works fine when it's executed as a single query. but when i union the result of this query with other queries, it returns a different set of data.
any one know why that might be the case??
select top 100 max(contact._id) "_id", max(old_trans.date) "callback_date", 7 "priority", max(old_trans.date) "recency", count(*) "frequency" --contact._id, contact.callback_date from topcat.class_contact contact inner join topcat.MMTRANS$ old_trans on contact.phone_num = old_trans.phone where contact.phone_num is not null and contact.status = 'New Contact' group by contact._id order by "recency" desc, "frequency" desc
i've included the union query here for completeness of the question
begin declare @current_date datetime set @current_date = GETDATE()
select top 100 _id, callback_date, priority, recency, frequency from ( ( select top 10 _id, callback_date, 10 priority, @current_date recency, 1 frequency --, DATEPART(hour, callback_date) "hour", DATEPART(minute, callback_date) "min" from topcat.class_contact where status ='callback' and (DATEPART(year, callback_date) <= DATEPART(year, @current_date)) and (DATEPART(dayofyear, callback_date) <= DATEPART(dayofyear, @current_date)) -- all call backs within that hour will be returned and (DATEPART(hour, callback_date) <= DATEPART(hour, @current_date)) and (DATEPART(hour, callback_date) <> 0) order by callback_date asc --order by priority desc, DATEPART(hour, callback_date) asc, DATEPART(minute, callback_date) asc, callback_date asc ) union ( select top 10 _id, callback_date, 9 priority, @current_date recency, 1 frequency from topcat.class_contact where status = 'callback' and callback_date is not null and (DATEPART(year, callback_date) <= DATEPART(year, @current_date)) and (DATEPART(dayofyear, callback_date) <= DATEPART(dayofyear, @current_date)) and (DATEPART(hour, callback_date) <= DATEPART(hour, @current_date)) and (DATEPART(hour, callback_date) = 0) order by callback_date asc ) union ( select top 10 _id, callback_date, 8 priority, @current_date recency, 1 frequency from topcat.class_contact where status = 'No Connect' and callback_date is not null and (DATEPART(year, callback_date) <= DATEPART(year, @current_date)) and (DATEPART(dayofyear, callback_date) <= DATEPART(dayofyear, @current_date)) and (DATEPART(hour, callback_date) <= DATEPART(hour, @current_date)) order by callback_date asc ) union ( select top 100 max(contact._id) "_id", max(old_trans.date) "callback_date", 7 "priority", max(old_trans.date) "recency", count(*) "frequency" --contact._id, contact.callback_date from topcat.class_contact contact inner join topcat.MMTRANS$ old_trans on contact.phone_num = old_trans.phone where contact.phone_num is not null and contact.status = 'New Contact' group by contact._id order by "recency" desc, "frequency" desc ) ) contact_queue order by priority desc, recency desc, callback_date asc, frequency desc
Primary platform is XP as client side and 2003 as server.
When I press F5 in order to see my report from IE appears this error:
An error has occurred during report processing. (rsProcessingAborted) Cannot create a connection to data source 'SQL1.BDADMIN'. (rsErrorOpeningConnection) For more information about this error navigate to the report server on the local server machine, or enable remote errors
However, preview button works properly and data are showed. Let me know where am I failing.
We have an issue with interactive sorting. Interactive sorting works in our Dev and test environments but does not work on our production server. We have deployed exactly the same report to each server. All servers are sp2 (9.00.3042.00). When the interactive sort buttons are clicked on production nothing happens. Has anyone seen this?
We have run into a really bizzare problem after upgrading to SQL Server 2005 SP2. We have a bunch of matrix reports that have interactive sort in the upper left hand corner, the sort based on Numeric and Text fields. For Example
=Fields!City.Value
=Sum(Fields!Pax.Value)
Now for whatever reason after upgrading to SP2 and making NO CHANGES to the reports or under data sources, interactive sorts that use the =Sum(....) no longer work but interactive sorts on text values still work.
I have a table with WritingMode for the column labels set to tb-rl (vertical writing). I want the text in each label to be right-aligned (i.e. aligned along the actual bottom of the cells), so I set TextAlign = Right. This works fine for all columns until I enable Interactive Sort. When Interactive Sort is activated TextAlign ignores the value and always behaves as if General (or Center) was selected. Is there a solution to this?
By the way: Is it possible to have the vertical text written upwards (bt-lr) instead of downwards?
I'm setting 'interactive sort' property on some columns of my SSRS report. By some reason, this functionality works only for some columns. Settings do not produce any errors and everything is OK on preview level but when report is accessed through web-based Report Manager only some of the sorting arrows appear.
I making a report using Matrix with 2 row groups and 1 column group. The group names are:
Row : CompanyName, TotalUsers
Column: UserType
Detail Group has a count of number of user in each type.
I want to use interactive sort feature on my column group so that when I click on my column header, it sort my detail group data ascending or decending and companyName and total users based on datail group.
It's well known issue, that one can't use any dataset fields in a report header/footer directly. One of the approach is to create query-based parameter that basically equals =First(Fields!@FieldName@.Value, "@DataSetName@") and use that parameter value instead. But it doesn't work in my case!
My report displays some entity description and is parametrized with EntityID param. Its header contains entity name that, according to the approach, is queried from the data source through the EntityName report parameter. There's important issue: the report is displayed in ReportViewer control, that is embedded into my application and entity ID parameter isn't ser by user in ReportViewer parameters area. Its default value is changed by the application with SetReportParameters() web method every time a user wants to view the report according to the entity the user is exploring in the application. But after the report has been rendered, its header always contains not actual (outdated) entity name. Nevertheless, the report body contains actual data (including entity name). If I alter entity ID parameter in ReportViewer or in web-based Report Manager and refresh report, header displays correct entity name.
I'm trying out the interactive sort feature (and have searched high and low for this answer), but can not make the sorting work if I have the data in the table grouped. If I remove the group, the sorting works fine but the output is not acceptable due to the duplicated records in the list.
I looked around quite a bit but couldn't get around to the issue I've at hand. I've a matrix report with one row group and one column group. I want to apply interactive sort so that when a user clicks on the column header based on the values in the column the report is rearranged.
The report shows:
Name 02/02/2008 01/31/2008
Test1 15 12 Test2 9 15
Now if the user clicks on 02/02/2008 then it will show Name 02/02/2008 01/31/2008
Im trying to do an interactive sort , one of the rows returned from my datasource called 'Total' i wish to display at the bottom always. is there a way i can do this?
I've tried the below on the column header but the total is either at the bottom or the top how can i check the ordering if Ascending or Descending? Then i cld swop the 1 and the 2 around.
I have a report that has several headings for users to click on to toggle visibility of the data regions that the headings represent. Several of the columns in the data tables have interactive sort enabled. However, every time the user clicks the sort indicator, the region collapses again and is hidden. So, ultimately for users the interactive sort becomes a two-click action, after which they have to visually re-orient.
I tried putting the table into a rectangle and toggling visibility of the rectangle instead of the table, but it exhibited the same behavior.
How can I get it so the regions do not get hidden just because the user sorts?
I have a parameter that chooses its available items from a query (with a label and a value column). I set the default for the parameter to the a particular value.
It works in Preview from design mode, but when I deploy it and run the report, it does not set the default.
Hi, I have a report with fiive columns, I have implemented interactive column sorting on the report. I have added a group to the report based on Column 2 and there is a page break by group. Now if I am on the second page ( page break by column 2 ) and sort on column 3(there is no grouping on column 3), the sorting happens but after the sort, the first page is displayed.IS there any way to remain on the same page while sorting? Thanks in Advance.
Hello I have a table with a RowNumber Group which shows 10 rows in each page. it works fine. in the next step i put an Interactive sorting on one column. i expect that the sorting is on the table no regarding the presentation which shows only 10 rows. in reality what happens is that the table was sorted seperated for each part of the 10 rows table, and no for the whole table.
does any one have a suggestion how to force the Interactive Sort , sorting he Whole table first and only later to present 10 rows each page (use the group expression)
In my Report, i have a grouping on project and Drill down on Project Cloumn only,now i need to implement interactive sort on rest of the columns,i implemented But it seems not working. can any one help me ..................... It is urgent requirement for me. rgds, kousik.
Interactive sorting works just fine on my report until I set the execution property to render from snapshot. When viewing a snapshot, clicking on the column sort arrows will not sort the data I'm viewing. If I turn the snapshot feature off, then I get the interactive sort functionality back.
Is this by design or am I missing something fundamental here?
I am just starting with Sql Server reporting, but I can't get interactive sort to work for columns with aggregate fields.
I am using the following query for DataSet:
SELECT Store.ID as StoreID, Store.Name as StoreName, COUNT(*) as NumReservations, SUM(Appointment.TotalBeforeTaxes) as Revenue FROM Store LEFT JOIN Appointment ON Store.ID=Appointment.StoreID GROUP BY ALL Store.ID, Store.Name ORDER BY Store.Name ASC
For report, I am using tabular data view. Interactive sorting works great for StoreID, StoreName, but doesn't work for NumReservations and Revenue fields. I turned it on for all 4 columns.
I'm having problem with sorting in matrix. My report looks something like below.
Name* Avg.* | Test1 Test2 Test3 ============================================== Jim 50% | 100% 40% 10% John 28% | 5% 40% 40%
The column with * need to be sorted. I can sort the name and average fine in Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services Version 9.00.2047.00. BUt when I run this in another environment, sorting on Avg doesn't work. The version on that is Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services Version 9.00.3054.00.
I put together a sample code against the northwinddatabase. Sorting works in 9.00.2047.00 but not 9.00.3054.00. Any ideas??
I have a drill down report and would like to add interactive sort on two columns:- column 1 & column 2. These two columns should be in descending order. By adding this, when user's click on column 1 they will see the data based on the sorted order. Does anyone help me on this issue.
I'm trying to implement Interactive Soring on the column headers in a matrix in a report. Is it actually possible to do this? I've read several internet posts and stories of implementing the Interactive Sorting in the upper-left corner of the matrix, but this is not what I want, I want to implement it on the column headers .
The goal I'm trying to achieve is to give the user the possibillity to click on a column header to sort the rows below in asc- or descending direction.
Please tell me if this is possible, because all my efforts have not been succesfull! If it's possible, please provide the solution to do this.
If you need more information, please don't hesitate to ask.
