I'd like to run 4 stored procedures in parallel on 4 different processors on our server.
Does anyone know the syntax to do that? (Could not find it on the web so far).
Anything else I need to do in addition to the specific syntax (i.e. any specific properties to set in Enterprise Manager)?
Your help is greatly appreciated!
Lana
I have another post here regarding SQL 2005 running a query 50% slower than on 2000. It was discovered that 2005 runs the query in series whereas 2000 runs it in parallel.
Even with "Cost Threshold For Parallelism" set to a default value – 0, 2005 still executes my query in series. Does anyone know how to force a query to run in parallel in SQL 2005. I specifically want to set it at the database level.
I have a SQL 7 db with a union query (view), and I'm getting the error, "Thequery processor could not start the necessary thread resources for parallelquery execution." This union query has been in place for about two years nowwith no problems until just now, though I haven't changed anything. Also, Ihave a local copy of the database on my machine, and the query runs fine.As noted, I haven't changed anything in the query, nor in the SQL settings.There is a network administrator, so it's possible that he may have changeda setting, but I don't know what. The query is reproduced below. Any ideasas to what's going on would be appreciated.NeilMain query:SELECT Tmp.INVCUST, Tmp.SDNBR, Tmp.SDBOOK, Tmp.SDIVCLN,Tmp.SDPAID, Tmp.SDPRICE, Tmp.SDCOPIES, Tmp.Location,INVTRY.AUTHILL1, Tmp.INVDATE, INVTRY.SaleSrc,INVTRY.HoldInitFROM (SELECT INVDATE, INVCUST, SDNBR, SDBOOK, SDIVCLN,SDPAID, SDPRICE, SDCOPIES, 'P' AS LocationFROM vwInvoiceDetUNION ALLSELECT INVDATE, INVCUST, SDNBR, SDBOOK, SDIVCLN,SDPAID, SDPRICE, SDCOPIES, 'N' AS LocationFROM vwInvoiceDetNUNION ALLSELECT INVDATE, INVCUST, SDNBR, SDBOOK, SDIVCLN,SDPAID, SDPRICE, SDCOPIES, 'M' AS LocationFROM vwInvoiceDetM) Tmp INNER JOINdbo.INVTRY ON Tmp.SDBOOK = dbo.INVTRY.[Index]vwInvoiceDet:SELECT tabInvoice.INVDATE, tabInvoice.INVCUST,SALEDET.SDNBR, SALEDET.SDBOOK, SALEDET.SDINVNUM,SALEDET.SDPRICE, SALEDET.SDPAID, SALEDET.SDCOPIES,SALEDET.SDIVCLN, tabInvoice.INVNBR, SALEDET.SDIDFROM dbo.tabInvoice INNER JOINdbo.SALEDET ONdbo.tabInvoice.INVNBR = dbo.SALEDET.SDNBR(vwInvoiceDetN and vwInvoiceDetM are similar to vwInvoiceDet.)
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi
View 5 Replies View RelatedIs there any way to run a stored procedure in parallel to another one? i.e. I have a stored procedure that sends an email. I then scan a table and send any unsent emails. I do not want the second part to slow the response to the user.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a monitoring tool that find a query that is using most of execution time of all sessions on the server.
I located it, and found it is a data flow task in an SSIS package.
It export data from a table which has big mount of data to another database.
I know it only executes one time, but I see in the monitoring tool it executes 4 times.
I am wondering is it because SSIS is doing it in parallel execution automatically?
We use all default settings, and the server physical cpu is 4.
Also it says the query is slow is because it has a wait called PREEMPTIVE_OS_WAITFORSINGLEOBJECT
not sure what does that mean
Hi,
We have a process that builds our data warehouse.
The processes execute SPs in serial order.
Each SP builds separate table.
Each table is build destructive (truncate and Insert Into).
I've tried to change the configuration by running 4 SP in parallel by SSIS to shorten the update time.
I've noticed in two declines in performance:
1. Each SP execution time is higher in the parallel execution in around 50% then in the serial execution. The CPU utilization is the same.
2. On each parallel execution we have a decline in performance of around 5 -10% compare to the previous parallel execution.
Do you have any directions to inquire?
Btw €“ we have Itanium 64bit x8 with 32GB memory
Thanks,
Assaf
Is is possible to get the iterations in a foreach loop to run in parallel? What I need to do is to spawn an arbitrary number of parallel execution paths that all look exactly the same. The number is equal to the number of input files, which varies from time to time. Any help is appreciated!
View 27 Replies View RelatedHi,
we're accessing a SQL Server as a source for some SSIS packages using quite complex SQL commands. We have dataflows getting data from up to 10 queries. The problem is that SSIS starts all these queries in parallel using up all the memory of the server (the source SQL server, not the server SSIS is running on). So the queries are very slow. Is there any way to force SSIS to start the queries after each other?
I already browsed the web for some answers on that and I'm not very optimistic... Maybe the only solution is really to feed the result of the query in raw files and process them later...
Thanks,
I have been trying to the query optimizer to generate a parallel execution plan but no matter the MaxDOP (0) or Cost Threshold (5) settings I use it will only execute in serial.
UPDATE [dbo].[Targus_201412_V7_B]
SET [URBAN] =(
CASE
WHEN [METRO_STATUS] = 'Urban' THEN 1
ELSE 0
END)
I've got an SSRS report that is set up using a data-driven subscription to supply input parameters to the stored procedure that is called to generate the report results.
I was wondering if there is any way to specify the execution processing method (running the reports in parallel or serially). The subscription that we have set up appears to be running all of the reports in parallel which is causing massive load on our servers.
Thanks.
SQL Server 2000 SP3ALast week one of our processes starting issuing or suffering deadlockdetected errors every 15 minutes or so.I have read several articles at MS on the subject. I set a couple ofstartup parameters related to producing deadlock detection informationand ran SQL Profiler. I found the SQL statements being issued by thedeadlocked statements. In every deadlock the same UPDATE statementappears however the data values being searched on are different. Thebest I can tell from trying to query the actual data each update hitsonly one or very few rows. No indexed column is updated so the indexesshould not be the source of conflict.Looking at the query I noticed that the query does not have anavailable index and Query Analyzer shows that the full table scan isbeing done in parallel.My question: Does SQL Server change or modify its locking rules whenqueries are converted to be ran using parallel processing? If so, doyou have a reference?Here is the deadlock entries posted to the error log:SPID=167ResType:LockOwner Stype:'OR' Mode: IX SPID:63 ECID:0 Ec:(0x65971510)Value:0x3c577e60 Cost:(0/0)Input Buf: Language Event: UPDATE Station_Upload setStation_Accept_Status = 'ACC',HeadStatus ='ACC',LastProcessedSta='110',HeadPartType='1' WHERE Part_Serial_No ='SCH1119323' AND Station = 'H110'SPID=63ResType:LockOwner Stype:'OR' Mode: IX SPID:167 ECID:0 Ec:(0x65801510)Value:0x3c27d060 Cost:(0/0)Input Buf: Language Event: UPDATE Station_Upload setStation_Accept_Status = 'ACC',HeadStatus ='ACC',LastProcessedSta='70',HeadPartType='1' WHERE Part_Serial_No ='SCH1119060' AND Station = 'H070'I have suggested adding an index to support the query.Any ideas?Thanks -- Mark D Powell --
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a deadlock trace running on a production server that is filling up with the following:
Lock: Deadlock Chain
Parallel query worker thread was involved in a deadlock SPID 8
105 - Resource Type Exchange
Spid 8 is a SQL process LOCK MONITOR
There are no graphs as seen with typical deadlock, so it is not two queries that are deadlocking, and I've never seen a deadlock for "LOCK MONITOR"
Can I roll back certain query(insert/update) execution in one page if query (insert/update) in other page execution fails in asp.net.( I am using sqlserver 2000 as back end)
scenario
In a webpage1, I have insert query into master table and Page2 I have insert query to store data in sub table.
I need to rollback the insert command execution for sub table ,if insert command to master table in web page1 is failed. (Query in webpage2 executes first, then only the query in webpage1) Can I use System. Transaction to solve this? Thanks in advance
SQL Server 2012 Performance Dashboard Main advices me this:
Since the application is from a vendor and I have no control over its code, how can improve this sitation?
I'm really stumped on this one. I'm a self taught SQL guy, so there is probobly something I'm overlooking.
I'm trying to get information like this in to a report:
WO#
-WO Line #
--(Details)
--Work Order Line Detail #1
--Work Order Line Detail #2
--Work Order Line Detail #3
--Work Order Line Detail #etc
--(Parts)
--Work Order Line Parts #1
--Work Order Line Parts #2
--Work Order Line Detail #etc
WO#
-WO Line #
--(Details)
--Work Order Line Detail #1
--Work Order Line Detail #2
--Work Order Line Detail #3
--Work Order Line Detail #etc
--(Parts)
--Work Order Line Parts #1
--Work Order Line Parts #2
--Work Order Line Parts #etc
I'm unable to get the grouping right on this. Since the line details and line parts both are children of the line #, how do you do "parallel groups"?
There are 4 tables:
Work Order Header
Work Order Line
Work Order Line Details
Work Order Line Requisitions
The Header has a unique PK.
The Line uses the Header and a Line # as foreign keys that together are unique.
The Detail and requisition tables use the header and line #'s in addition to their own line number foreign keys. My queries ends up looking like this:
WO WOL WOLR WOLD
226952 10000 10000 10000
226952 10000 10000 20000
226952 10000 10000 30000
226952 10000 10000 40000
226952 10000 20000 10000
226952 10000 20000 20000
226952 10000 20000 30000
226952 10000 20000 40000
399999 10000 NULL 10000
375654 10000 10000 NULL
etc
Hierarchy:
WO > WOL > WOLD
WO > WOL > WOLR
It probobly isn't best practice, but I'm kinda new so I need some guidance. I'd really appreciate any help! Here's my query:
SELECT [Work Order Header].No_ AS WO_No, [Work Order Line].[Line No_] AS WOL_No,
[Work Order Requisition].[Line No_] AS WOLR_No, [Work Order Line Detail].[Line No_] AS WOLD_No
FROM [Work Order Header] LEFT OUTER JOIN
[Work Order Line] ON [Work Order Header].No_ = [Work Order Line].[Work Order No_] LEFT OUTER JOIN
[Work Order Line Detail] ON [Work Order Line].[Work Order No_] = [Work Order Line Detail].[Work Order No_] AND
[Work Order Line].[Line No_] = [Work Order Line Detail].[Work Order Line No_] LEFT OUTER JOIN
[Work Order Requisition] ON [Work Order Line].[Work Order No_] = [Work Order Requisition].[Work Order No_] AND
[Work Order Line].[Line No_] = [Work Order Requisition].[Work Order Line No_]
Hi all I'm using Sql server 2000 and sometimes i need to run my Queries in Query analizer before using them in my application just to test them...BUT most of the time when i run a query in query-analizer for second time ,query analizer populates the result (records) more quicker then the first time. Apparently it caches the query !!! i don't know but for some reasons i dont't want this , so how can i prevent Query-analizer from doing so?
Thanks in advance. Regards.
What are the Query Execution plan. How to read and interpret query execution plan.
spatle
I have a query like this:
SELECT *,isnull(dbo.fn_1(a),'') f_a,
isnull(dbo.1(b),'') f_b FROM tablea with(nolock)
WHERE ID = 12345 and ID<10000000 and dbo.fn_1(7)='asdfasdf' and Active='Y'
Does it effect performance as i am using a udf here? Also let me know the order in which the conditions will be applied.
Thanks in advance.
Thanvi
Hi,
I want to know is there any way by which we can come to know
which query is going to be executed by the Engine prior to its
execution. I think if this is possible then this will affect the
performance. But It will be very helpful for me.
Is this is possible and how we can achieve this.
Plz help me out its very urgent .
Thanks for the help in Advanced.
Thanks.
Hi all,
I have sql query to search for fields in a rather big view. If I execute the
query in sql server enterprise manager, the results will be displayed in
less than 6 seconds. However, if I execute it using asp.net, it will take
very long (more than 2 minutes).
The query is a simple one like "SELECT * FROM myview WHERE name LIKE
'%Microsoft%'". And the code I use to execute it in asp.net is
Dim dsRtn As DataSet
Dim objConnection As OleDbConnection
Try
objConnection = GetOleDbConnection()
objConnection.Open()
Dim objDataAdapter As New OleDbDataAdapter(strSearch, objConnection)
Dim objDataSet As New DataSet()
objDataAdapter.Fill(objDataSet, strTableName)
dsRtn = objDataSet
Catch ex As Exception
dsRtn = Nothing
Finally
If objConnection.State = ConnectionState.Open Then
objConnection.Close()
End If
End Try
Where strSearch is the sql search string.
I don't have any problem using such code for other queries.
Could somebody suggest the cause of the problem and how to solve it? Thanks!
Best regards,
David
Hi,
I am having a query where I am connecting to eight different tables using joins. When I join one table to another the speed of the execution becomes less. Even on my local server it is taking nearly 2 to 3 minutes to execute the query. How can I increase the speed of execution of my query.
Thanks in advance,
Uday
Hi,
Is there anything to be gained in a single table query by using :
tablename.columnname1, tablename.columnname2 etc
vs just columnname1,columnname2 ?
Thanks,
Judith
Hello ,
I wanted to know whether we have an execution plan enabled in SQL 6.5 as we have it in SQL 7.0 and SQL 2000 .
I.e when we execute a query and if we enable ' show execution plan 'then it creates a map and shows the vital statistics .
If that is available on SQL 6.5 then i am missing that tool .
How can i have it installed on my SQL 6.5 server ??
Thanks.
I have a procedure (used to create a report) and was used in sql 7.0 service pack 3.
Problem is that we are upgrading to SQL 2000 and this procedure now takes 1 minute and 30 seconds to execute vs. 10 seconds previously.
Everything is same between the sql 7 and sql 2000 server. i.e. database size, indexes, hardware etc.
I looked at the query execution plan and it seems to do a sort which is taking majority of the resources on sql 2000 even though there is no sort stmt issued in the procedure itself.
Any help would be appreciated?? I am more curious to find out why this is the case when all the variables are same between the two servers yet sql 2000 performance is much worse than sql 7.0. It should be the other way around!!
Hi,
I am using a store procedure and in this sp i am having a simple select statement. Now i found that when i executes this sp in query analyzer it takes about 8-10 min to show the output. Table is having thousands of records. I can rebuild indexes on table, but apart from this what else i can do to speed up the query.
I know there is something like we can use indexes explicitly in sql query. Is it true? if yes plz show me how to use it, by giving example
Also is there any other way to run the query much faster.
Plz help me, its very urgent
Thanks And Regards,
Shailesh
We have SQL Server 2000 and int is an Oracle linked server. I'm trying to run the following query...
SELECT DISTINCT a.auf_nr AS OrderNo,
e.ku_name AS Customer,
d.bestell_dat AS OrdDate,
d.liefer_dat AS DelvDate,
CAST(SUM(b.anz) AS FLOAT) Qty,
CAST(SUM((CAST(c.breite AS FLOAT) / 1000 * CAST(c.hoehe AS FLOAT) / 1000) * b.anz) AS FLOAT) SQM,
CAST(SUM(a.liefer_offen) - (SUM(a.anz) - SUM(b.anz)) AS FLOAT) AvailDelv,
CAST(SUM(a.liefer_anz) AS FLOAT) Delvd,
CAST(SUM(c.sum_brutto*a.anz) AS FLOAT) Value
FROM liorder..LIORDER.AUF_STAT a,
liorder..LIORDER.AUF_LIP_STATUS b,
liorder..LIORDER.AUF_POS c,
liorder..LIORDER.AUF_KOPF d,
liorder..LIORDER.KUST_ADR e
WHERE a.auf_nr = b.auf_nr and
b.auf_nr = c.auf_nr and
c.auf_nr = d.auf_nr and
d.kunr = e.ku_nr and
a.auf_pos = b.auf_pos and
b.auf_pos = c.auf_pos and
b.lip_status = 7 and
c.ver_art !='V' and
a.history = 0 and
a.rg_stat != 2 and
e.ku_name IS not null and
e.ku_vk_ek = 0 and
d.bestell_dat BETWEEN '01/01/2005' and '12/17/2005'
GROUP BY a.auf_nr,
d.liefer_dat,
b.lip_status,
d.bestell_dat,
e.ku_name,
d.kopf_tour,
d.kopf_firma
HAVING CAST(SUM(a.liefer_offen)-(SUM(a.anz)-SUM(b.anz)) AS FLOAT) > 0
..and it takes around 2 minutes to show the results even if the date range is of the same date. I even tried to use an indexed column but I still get the same slow execution time. I even tried to create a UDF so that the WHERE clause would be resolved remotely on the Oracle DB but still the same. Is there anyway I can do it in much more efficient and faster way?
Hello
I have a .Net application that calls an stored procedure. When it does, the execution goes and never ends (I have to kill the windows process). When I call the sp from within the Management Studio, it also never ends executing and I have to cancel the query. But, when I call it immediately after, it takes 45 seconds to complete.
Now, the sp has several parts and I have made that it prints a message at the end of each part so that I can read where it stops. Strange enough, it completes all parts except the last one, which has the form INSERT INTO myLocalTable SELECT * FROM MyRemoteTable. But if I execute the Select independetly, I discover that it brings no rows! Now, many of the @@rowcount printed after the execution of the other parts shows zero rows involved or just a few. I am not using cursors, each part is an UPDATE statement or an INSERT.
TestMachine1 runs SQL2005 SP2 and has as linked server myRemoteServer (SQL2000) server. The stored procedure in TestMachine1 inserts rows to a table in myRemoteServer and brings back some rows.
What could be wrong?
can anybody help How to solve the below error.While calling the sp from the front application the below error is thrown.but if i executed the sp in backend No error is thrown ,resultset is produced.
Error thrown:
The query has been canceled because the estimated cost of this query (7) exceeds the configured threshold of 6. Contact the system administrator.
A query that runs in a second or so in Query Analyzer requires 20 seconds in a linked Access Project.
What's the secret of MS_Access poor performance, and can it be improved?
Tom Stuart
I have a strong feeling that this isn't possible but I thought I might as well ask...
I'm developing a database application (SQL Server 2000 backend) where the client and the server is separated over a slow network connection (satellite). There are parts in the application where I will have to query a large resultset so I was wondering if there is a way to determine the percent complete of a query so I can put a progress bar on the interface so the user can see it loading data instead of having a frozen form.
I thought about spliting up the query into different ones and update the bar once each separate one is complete but I'd rather not do that because in the application development environment I'm working in, I have to close the resultset and reopen it every time I do a query... unless this isn't a big deal but I'm under the impression its something to avoid.
Thanks!
Hi there - i'm hoping someone can help me!I'm having a problem with a live database that i'm running on MSDE - Itseems to have slowed down quite considerably from the test environment(even when all the data is the same). The is notably different on oneparticular query that takes 1 sec on the test machine and almost 1 minon the live machineThe total number of user connections on the live machine is normally 4or so (found out through the Performance monitor). So I can't see thatit's MSDE's performance throttler...Has anybody got any ideas on things i can check for??Many thanksJames
View 8 Replies View RelatedWe have a console.php which takes in SQL queries and displays them in aresult.php webpage.Sometimes the query takes minutes to execute or crashes the PHPapplication. Is it possible to cancel a query during execution?If yes, how does one go about it.The PHP Console is used by multiple users simultaneously.The queries are executed on a Remote Database.
View 2 Replies View Related