Performance Difference Between Query Executed Through ASP.NET And SSMS
Sep 18, 2007
I have also posted this in microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming.
I have a query which, depending on where I run it from, will either take 10 milliseconds or 10 seconds.
The query works perfectly when run in SQL Server Management Studio... in my database of around 70,000 items it returns the results in around 10ms. It uses all my indexes and indexed views correctly.
However when I run the identical query from my ASP.NET application, it takes around 10 seconds... 1000 times longer.
Looking at it in Sql Server Profiler I can't see any difference in the query, except from ASP.NET it needs 62531 reads and from SSMS it needs only 318 reads. If I copy the slow running ASP.NET query from the profiler into SSMS, then it runs quick again. The results returned are the same.
I have provided more details of the query below, but I guess my real question is: What is the best way to debug this? I'm not an expert with SQL Server, so any pointers on where I should start looking to find the difference in how the query is being executed would be a great help.
The query is of the form:
WITH RowPost AS
(
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY DateCreated DESC) AS Row,
ItemId,
Title,
....
FROM
Items_View WITH(NOEXPAND)
WHERE ItemX >= @minX AND ItemX <= @maxX AND ItemY >= @minY AND ItemY <= @maxY
)
SELECT
*,
(SELECT Count(*) FROM RowPost) AS [Count]
FROM RowPost
WHERE Row >= @minRow AND Row < @maxRow
Where Items_View is an indexed view, and WITH(NOEXPAND) is being used to force it to use the indexed view (this is optimal). The line beginning "SELECT Count(*)" is to get the total number of results (without having to run the inner query a second time).
This is running against SQL Server Developer Edition.
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Aug 12, 2006
Okay, so I came across an odd performance issue that I'm wondering if some guru can help me out with.
I have a query that uses a paging algorithm that uses a paging algorithm and a table variable, then gets a page of data based on a join to that table variable. Here's a simplified query using the algoritm:
--declare table variable... not shown for brevity
--make sure we only store the least amount of records possible
SET ROWCOUNT ( @pageNumber + 1 ) * @pageSize
--insert into table variable
INSERT INTO @TableVariable( Key )
SELECT key FROM table
WHERE whatever = @p1
--we only want one page of data
SET ROWCOUNT @pageSize
--now get the page of data from the table
SELECT key FROM table
WHERE whatever = @p1
AND [TableVar Identity Column] > @pageNumber * @pageSize
The algorithm works great for our needs, BUT, I noticed something a little odd about its behavior during performance testing.
In particular, when I run the query using Sql Server Management Studio, where I manually DECLARE all the variables it ends up needing only 156 reads to complete the job. When I call it from the app using ADO.NET, however, I noticed it needs 310 reads! Huh?
I looked for differences, and the only one I could determine was that ADO.NET passes the query and uses sp_executesql and passes the parameters vs. declaring and setting them statically before executing the query. I confirmed that this was the issue by manually running sp_execute SQL and seeing that it took roughly the same number of reads (274) to process the query.
Naturally, I don't want the time it takes to perfrom my query to double, but and frankly I don't understand why there would be a difference in performance. Can anyone help me track down what is going on and suggest to me how to fix the problem.
I assume that SQL Server Management Studio optimizes the execution path somehow, but I'm not sure how to gain the same benefit for my passed query. Can I enable something with hints? Is there something else going on that I should know about?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2015
I have a specific requirement. I need to insert the DML statements executed from Management Studio into a SQL table. We have SQL Server 2008 R2 and 2012 instances.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2007
Executing the stored procedure took 45 seconds. But copying the code to a query window and setting up the variables (instead of parameters), it took 7 seconds.
In the query window, most of the processing cost (86%) is right up front in a "Distinct Sort." But in exec stored procedure, the cost for this step is 11% and the significant costs are in later "Table Scans."
I don't know why SQL Server would choose different execution plans when the code is identical in each.
Any quick insights?
Many thanks.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 1, 2007
Hi,
I'm having an issue with a query I'm running on Sql Server 2005. It's a semi-complex query involving an in-line table function and several left outer joins which are joined on to the results of the function call. Two of the left outer joins are then qualified in a where clause of the form where table.Col is not null; the idea is that the final result set contains data that has no match in those two tables.
The problem revolves around a where clause in the function and the last left outer join (ie, one of the ones qualified with where not null). When I alter the where clause of the function to further restrict the result set the function returns, the query times shoots up from 1 second to roughly 2-3 minutes. Note that the time the function takes to complete is not affected. The difference in time is purely down to what the query does with the results the function provides. Also note that the change to the where clause provides a subset of the original data; it does not add any more data (it actually restricts the original resultset by roughly 1000 rows).
I can bring the query speed back down again by removing the last left outer join - this join takes one of the columns from the function, and joins it to a small table - 924 rows. So it appears that this particular join is the cause of the issue, but only when using the resultset generated from the modified function query.
Now, as the thread title alludes, Sql Server 2000 and 2005 handle this differently, or appear to. When I execute this same query on a Sql 2000 machine, there's no apparent time differences, and the data that is returned is as expected. Does anyone have any suggestions as to what might be causing this and how I can fix it? I could simply return the larger resultset and use managed code to filter out the rows I don't want; however, I would like to get to the bottom of this, especially if it's going to effect future queries.
Cheers,
Chris
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2007
What's the difference between "SQL Server Management Studio" and "SQL Server Management Studio Express"? Is there any link to explain this?
Thanks,
Canada DBA
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 26, 2008
Just wonder whether is there any indicator or system parameters that can indicate whether stored procedure A is executed inside query analyzer or executed inside application itself so that if execution is done inside query analyzer then i can block it from being executed/retrieve sensitive data from it?
What i'm want to do is to block someone executing stored procedure using query analyzer and retrieve its sensitive results.
Stored procedure A has been granted execution for public user but inside application, it will prompt access denied message if particular user has no rights to use system although knew public user name and password. Because there is second layer of user validation inside system application.
However inside query analyzer, there is no way control execution of stored procedure A it as user knew the public user name and password.
Looking forward for replies from expert here. Thanks in advance.
Note: Hope my explaination here clearly describe my current problems.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 1999
One particular SQL stored procedure executes 25 times more slowly when invoked by an SQlAgent job than when executed directly. Any suggestions?
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 23, 2008
Hey,
In a ASP application, which used Access and is now being migrated to SQL 2005, I have a medium-sized query with many inner joins. I optimized the tables, with indexes, etc, and if I run the query on the SSMS it returns me like 55 lines in less then a second. On the other hand, when the ASP page passes the query to the SQL 2005, it takes 10 sec. to get the data. Using the Profiler I found that the sp_fetch is being executed a lot of times. It looks like the query is decomposed in smaller pieces and the rows as selected one by one. I'm using OleDb.
How to make the ADO (the culprit in my opinion) to execute that query at once?
Thank you.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 22, 2006
Hello guys,
I would like to know if there is any meaningful difference in speed performance between using the DNS ("sql.server.com") or the IP address of the sql-server in the connection string.
The advantage of using DNS is that if there is any change in IP, I do not have to change the connection strings, but I do not want to loose speed because of the necessity to resolve the DNS.
Thanks for any help!
Regards,
Fabian
my favorit hoster is ASPnix : www.aspnix.com !
View 6 Replies
View Related
Dec 4, 2007
Dear All,
is there any difference performance wise using
select * from my_table
and
select mycol1,mycol2....mycoln from my_table
actually i've read from one article the there is big difference....
please clear my doubt...
thanks in advance
Vinod
Even you learn 1%, Learn it with 100% confidence.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2006
Hello Everyone,
Does anyone know if there is a performance difference between the new WITH clause t-sql and the subquery?
On a basic functionality level, they seem to perform the same function but I was wondering if there are any performance difference between the 2?
Thanks,
Joseph
View 9 Replies
View Related
Sep 15, 2014
I have one question what is performance difference between cluster index on numeric field or string field? I know that numeric is faster but why it is faster?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2006
SQL 2000 Connection String:user id=MyUserName;password=MyPassword;initial catalog=MyDB;server=MyServer;Connect Timeout=30 This SELECT statement returns its 10 results nearly instantly:SELECT * FROM MyTableDitto from above, but completes in 30-40 seconds:SELECT * FROM [dbo].[MyTable]Ditto from above, but completes nearly instantly:
SELECT TOP 1000 * FROM [dbo].[MyTable] Obviously I have stopped using the [dbo] syntax in my SqlCommand's (SELECT's and EXECUTE's) but still would like to know why this is.vr, Rich
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 4, 2007
Hello, all, I started out thinking my problems were elsewhere but as Ihave worked through this I have isolated my problem, currently, as adifference between MSDE and SQL Express 2005 (I'll just call itExpress for simplicity).I have, to try to simplify things, put the exact same DB on twosystems, one running MSDE and one running Express. Both have 2 Ghzprocessors (one Intel, one AMD), both have a decent amount of RAM(Intel system has 1 GB, AMD system has 512 MB), and plenty of GB offree disk space. MSDE is running on the Intel system, Express isrunning on the AMD system. To keep things fair I use the exact sameDB's and query on both systems. The DB's were created on MSDE so Isp_detach_db'd them from MSDE and then sp_attach_db'd them to Express(this is how MS says to do a "side-by-side" upgrade, so it'sacceptable to do so). After fighting problems in performancedifferences in different situations I have narrowed the problem downto this:Executing a simple select statement with join clause on the databasesyields a difference in execution time that is quite great. Using theExpress Management program I can run the query against either system(MSDE or Express, the two systems are connected via crossover cable toeliminate any network problems/issues). When running the queryagainst the MSDE system (which is over the network) I consistently get<20 ms response times on the query. When running the query againstthe Express installation (which is in shared memory) I consistentlyget 700 ms or longer response times. Both times are for the TotalExecution Time.The query is simply this: select db1.* from db1.owner.tablename as db1inner join db2.owner.tablename as db2 on db1.pkey = db2.someid wheredb1.criteria = 3So, gimme all the columns from one table in one DB (local to theinstallation), matching the records in another DB (also local to theinstallation), where one field in the first db matches a field in thesecond db and where, in the first db, one column value = 3.The first table has a total record count of 630 records of which only12 match the where clause. The second table has a total record countof about 2,700 of which only 12 match up on the 12 out of 630.Even though the data is the same and I've done the detach and attach,and even done the sp_updatestats, the difference in execution time isremarkable, in a bad way.Checking the Execution Plan reveals that both queries have the samesteps, but, on the MSDE system the largest consumer in the process isthe Clustered Index Scan of the 630 record table (DB1 in my queryexample), using 85%. The next big consumer is a Clustered Index Seekagainst the other table (2,700 rows), using 15%.The Execution Plan against the Express system reveals basically theexact opposite: 27% going to the Clustered Index Scan of the 630record DB1, and 72% going to the Clustered Index Seek of the 2,700record DB2.I'm sorry to be stupid but I have this information but I don't knowwhat to do with it. The best that I can tell from this is that thisis the source of my problems. My problems are that on my currentsystems that my clients use the data is returned to them faster thanthey can click the mouse and that the new system (that is, when theychose (or are forced by attrition) to move to Vista and thus Express2005) the screen pop is like 1.5 seconds. This creates poor userexperience. Worse, one process I allow the users to do goes fromtaking 14-30 seconds to over 4 minutes (all on the same machine withthe same OS and version of my program, so it's not a machine or OS ormy app problem).Anyway, I hope someone can shed some light on this now that I've paredit down some.Thanks in advance.--HC
View 9 Replies
View Related
Dec 13, 2007
Hi,
I created a CLR UDF that returns a large number of rows, when I run it from my VPC (XP, SQL Server Developer Edition and 1GB Memory) it takes approx 2 min and 30 secs to start displaying the rows (Using Management Studio), when I run the same query in our development server (Win 2003, SQL Server Enterprise Edition, 8 GB Memory and 8 Processors) it takes more than 15 min to start displaying the results, does anybody have an idea why is this happening?
Thanks in advance
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2015
I have encountered a problem with a specific set of tables. The same select yields slightly differing execution plans in two different environments (instances). But the slight variation seems to contain a huge differences in stats. I don't know the significance of these stats. The two tables have the exact same indices.
This is the selcet statement:
SELECT 'xx' FROM DUKS.dbo.Profiler
WHERE DNA_Løbenummer IN
(SELECT DNA_Løbenummer FROM DUKS.dbo.Effektregister
WHERE Sagsnummer = '2015-00002')
View 17 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2004
Hello, i have a trigger and i want to know the query that raised it, or want to retrieve the last executed query by the server. I think it's a hard question but i know that someone can help me... Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2002
I created DTS a while ago and placed in job to run once a day (it worked fine for 3 months)
2 days ago I changed sa password and now job fails with error (Login failed for user 'sa'.), but it run fine from DTS !!!
1. My DTS created with domain Account DomainSVCSQL2000( sa rights and local admin)
2. SVCSQL service use DomainSVCSQL2000 to run
3. SVCSQL agent use DomainSVCSQL2000 to run
4. DTS use 'osql -E
Where should look for reference to sa ?
Executed as user: MONTREALsvcsql2000. DTSRun: Loading... Error: -2147217843 (80040E4D); Provider Error: 18456 (4818) Error string: Login failed for user 'sa'. Error source: Microsoft OLE DB Provider for SQL Server Help file: Help context: 0. Process Exit Code 1. The step failed.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 19, 2008
hi,
i want log the query executed in stored procedure ..
any way of doing it in sql server 2000
regards.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
This is a request for help fixing a SQL Server 2000/ADO problem on WindowsXP. I would appreciate any useful assistance.PROBLEM: SQL Server access on my machine fails as follows:1. All of my VB6 apps reference the following ADO typelib:Microsoft ActiveX Data Objects 2.7 LibraryLocated at:c:Program FilesCommon FilesSystemADOmsado27.tlbWhen I open one of these projects in VB6, the reference to msado27.tlb isshown as MISSING. If I remove the reference then open the references dialogagain, msado27.tlb is listed normally. When I check it and try to close thereferences dialog, I take an "Error in loading DLL".I can remove the reference to msado27.tlb and add a reference to msado15.dll(Microsoft ActiveX Data Objects 2.8 Library).When I run the app, I take a trappable error on the first ADO line my appexecutes:Dim lo_Connection As ADODB.ConnectionSet lo_Connection = New ADODB.ConnectionThe error is:Automation errorThe specified procedure could not be found.2. In Enterprise Manager, when I do "Open Table/Return All Rows" on anytable, I take the following error:"The query cannot be executed because some files are either missing or notregistered. Run setup again to make sure the required files areregistered."CURRENT CONFIGURATIONI develop software in VB6 that accesses SQL Server via a dsn-lessconnections and disconnected recordsets. I am running SQL Server 2000Standard locally, version installed from the MSDN install CD and updated byservice pack download.SQL Server version: version 8.00.760 (SP3)VB version: VB6 SP5Component Checker 2.0 shows no problems, and reports:The following product releases were matched: MDAC 2.8 RTM.My OS is Windows XP Home. As far as I can tell, it is completely updatedwith all hotfixes, including the following:KB810218KB820291KB821253KB822603KB823182KB824105KB824141KB826939KB828035KB829558Q322011Q327979Q814995Q815485ATTEMPTS TO FIXA. I have uninstalled and reinstalled SQL Server and client tools *numerous*times with no change.B. Queries in Query Analyzer execute just fine.C. The last four lines out of sqlstp.log (located in c:Windows) are asfollows:12:40:04 StatsGenerate returned: 212:40:04 StatsGenerate (0x0,0x1,0xf000000,0x100,1033,303,0x0,0x1,0,0,012:40:04 StatsGenerate -1,George Copeland)12:40:04 Installation SucceededD. The only services running during setup are those specified by MicrosoftKB article 192710. There are no relevant errors in the event log.E. I tried reinstalling MDAC 2.7 SP1 Refresh and MDAC 2.8. No change.F. Microsoft KB Article 315868(http://support.microsoft.com/defaul...Ben-us%3B315868) saysthe following:If the reinstallation of the SQL Server 2000 Client Tools does not correctthe problem, then re-register the following DLLs by using Regsvr32.exe, andthen restart the computer:C:Program filesCommon FilesSystemADOMsado15.dllC:Program filesCommon FilesSystemOle DbOledb32.dllC:Program filesCommon FilesSystemOle DbSqloledb.dllC:WINNTSystem32Atl.dllAttempting to register the first three dlls fails with"LoadLibrary("C:Program filesCommon FilesSystemADOMsado15.dll")failed - The specified procedure could not be found.". In any case, thisdoes nothing to fix the problem. And since these link libraries are notregisterable, this KB article is just a little, shall I say, unhelpful.Please note that the MS newsgroups are FULL of requests for help on thisEXACT problem. All attempts to help have failed--NOBODY has figured out thefix. Most people trying to help are treating it as an installation issue,because that is what the error message says. However, I suspect insteadthat a Windows XP hotfix has CLOBBERED ADO.BTW, this is a BIG issue for me. My development machine is hosed, and untilI get this fixed, I AM COMPLETELY DOWN.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2007
How SQL Query/ Stored procedure are being executed by SQL Server Engine ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2015
SQL Server 2014 BI edition.
select * from sys.dm_os_performance_counters returns the object names prefixed with "SQLServer:" (e.g. SQLServer:Databases)
It was expected as in other editions also. Issue is that when we try to crate "SQLServer Performance Condition alert", object names in "Object" list comes without the prefix "SQLServer:" (e.g. Databases). Please see the attached snapshots.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 2, 2015
My Excel Pivot Table connects to and SSAS 2008 cube. What exactly happens in the back-end during 'Waiting for the query to be executed...'
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 6, 2006
Hi ,
is it possible extract file name from script executed in query
analyser ?
Example steps
1. open QA
2. open c:mySuperScript.sql
code in c:mySuperScript.sql
use master
select @filename as [file executed]
select count(*) as xfrom syslogins
3. run
-- result
file executed
------------
c:mySuperScript.sql
x
--
112
Why we need it.
Each database update created using sql compare tool from red-gate
Script saved in Vss
When script executed in production using QA we save output as proof of deployment
currently we add to each script
select
'script= put you file name'+ char(13)+
'server = ' + cast(@@servername as char(20))+ char(13)+
'dbname= ' + cast(DB_NAME()as char(20)) + char(13) +
'execution date= '+ cast(getdate()as char(24))+ char(13)+
'executed by = '+ system_user
We want wrap everything in procedure that will
extract executed file name and other values
this procedure should be first line of code in each script
Thanks
Alex
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hi all,i'm working with SQL Server for about 4 years, and i have eversearching for a tool which can script my DATA in a T-SQL format tocopy them very easy from one server to another.For example scripts like that:IF NOT EXISTS (...)INSERT INTO (...)ELSEUPDATE (...)I have never found a tool like that, so i write a it by myself.This software is a free version in the moment, you can download it onmy website:http://www.sqlscripter.com..NET Framework on your client PC is required.Have fun with it ...Thomas
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 4, 2007
Hi friend!
I want to schedule a query or procedure running at given time regularly eg: at 12AM daily. Please tell me how to do that in sql server 2005.
We use SQL server 2005 developer edition.
Thanks in advance.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 23, 2006
Hello Everyone,I have a very complex performance issue with our production database.Here's the scenario. We have a production webserver server and adevelopment web server. Both are running SQL Server 2000.I encounted various performance issues with the production server with aparticular query. It would take approximately 22 seconds to return 100rows, thats about 0.22 seconds per row. Note: I ran the query in singleuser mode. So I tested the query on the Development server by taking abackup (.dmp) of the database and moving it onto the dev server. I ranthe same query and found that it ran in less than a second.I took a look at the query execution plan and I found that they we'rethe exact same in both cases.Then I took a look at the various index's, and again I found nodifferences in the table indices.If both databases are identical, I'm assumeing that the issue is relatedto some external hardware issue like: disk space, memory etc. Or couldit be OS software related issues, like service packs, SQL Serverconfiguations etc.Here's what I've done to rule out some obvious hardware issues on theprod server:1. Moved all extraneous files to a secondary harddrive to free up spaceon the primary harddrive. There is 55gb's of free space on the disk.2. Applied SQL Server SP4 service packs3. Defragmented the primary harddrive4. Applied all Windows Server 2003 updatesHere is the prod servers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.67GHZTotal Physical Memory 2GB, Available Physical Memory 815MBWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1Here is the dev serers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.80GHz2GB DDR2-SDRAMWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1I'm not sure what else to do, the query performance is an order ofmagnitude difference and I can't explain it. To me its is a hardware oroperating system related issue.Any Ideas would help me greatly!Thanks,Brian T*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2015
I know it is possible to use the secondary replica to pull data (application intent) etc..
But is there some way to query the replica directly via SSMS?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2007
When I create a new query window in SSMS 2005 (SP2) , I do not have any available database in de SQL Editor pane. Though in the Object Explorer window below, I can access all objects of all databases. The only way to query a table is by using the 'Open Table' feature in the Object Explorer window, then right-click on Pane-->SQL .
I also can open a stored procedure, but not modify it as the SQL Editor pane is disabled.
The SQL-Editor pane is available for all the other servertypes (Analysis, Reporting, Integration).
All services all started.
I re-installed completely SQL2005 and SP2 : nothing changed.
What am I missing ???
Versions = Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio 9.00.3042.00
SQL Developer Edition 2005 (Service Pack 2)
Windows XP Pro 5.1 (build 2600 Service Pack 2)
Any help is welcome !!!
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2014
Previous to 2012, grid results from SSMS queries pasted into Excel beautifully and were easy to format.in 2008, The results from this query pasted into a spreadsheet with the query contained in a single Excel cell:
(sample - not the whole script)
select top 300
Avg_CPU_Time
,Total_Physical_Reads
,convert(datetime,Last_execution_time) as Timestamp
,Stored_Procedure
,Query_text
from dbadmin.dbo.History_CPU_IO_ByQueryAndSP
This was wonderful. I could deliver to developers wonderfully tidy reports on query resource usage with timestamps along with which stored procedure the queries came from.
Can't do that in SSMS 2012. Try it. It's a disaster. The Query_text, when pasted, spreads across multiple Excel columns, including the ones designated for other data. The result is totally unreadable.how to make the query_text stay in it's own cell? I've tried converting query_text to varchar and ntext. Same results.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 2006
Dear All,We have a database which contains many tables which have millions ofrecords. When We attach the database with MS SQL Server 2005 StandardEdition Server and run some queries (having joins, filters etc.) thenthey take very long time to execute while when We execute same querieson Enterprise Edition then they run 10 times faster than on standardedition.Our database does not use any features which are present in EnterpriseEdition and not present in Standard Edition. We want to know what arethe differences between Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition forperformance. Why should we go for Enterprise Edition when StandardEdition has all the features required.We are presently using evaluation versions of SQL Server 2005 Standardand Enterprise Editions.Thanks and regards,Nishant Sainihttp://www.simplyjava.com
View 23 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2008
Hello,I have been searching and reading a lots of information on the microsoft website about the different version of SQL server, but still can not make my decision.In term of performance, is there a real big difference between the workgroup and the standard version? The workgroup is limited to 3 GB of RAM while the standard is unlimited, would that really change the performance if my server has 16Gb or RAM?The price difference is pretty substantial so if could only have to buy the workgroup , it would be better.One more question, regarding the type of licence, my server has 2 processors, could I avoid buying 2 licences and get the Server plus CAL instead. I am using this server to host 4 web-application running on SQL server. Each database is about 15 MB.Thanks in adavance for your advises.Arno
View 3 Replies
View Related