Possible To Have Multiple Query Execution Plans For A Stored Procedure?
Feb 21, 2013
I think not. Microsoft says it is possible: one for parallel and one for serial execution. Don't believe that's possible for a stored procedure to change execution plans on the fly. Have an on-going problem with timeout occurring with an application and narrowed the culprit to a stored procedure. I couldn't find any obvious issues database wise, no locks, etc. so I recompiled (altered) the sproc without making any changes and the issue cleared for a couple days.
It happened again to day, and so I recompiled (altered) the sproc and it went away again. No code changes to both application (so they say) and stored procedure. I ran the below code snippet to check for sprocs with multiple cached plans and the offending one came up on a short list. So, my question is, Is it one sproc per query plan or can there be more than one. I understand the connection issues.
Code:
SELECT db_name(st.dbid) DBName,
object_schema_name(st.objectid, dbid) SchemaName,
object_name(st.objectid, dbid) StoredProcedure,
MAX(cp.usecounts) Execution_count,
st.text [Plan_Text]
INTO #TMP
[Code] .....
View 13 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 23, 2005
I have a stored procedure that suddenly started performing horribly.The query plan didn't look right to me, so I copy/pasted the code andran it (it's a single SELECT statement). That ran pretty well and useda query plan that made sense. Now, I know what you're all thinking...stored procedures have to optimize for variable parameters, etc.Here's what I've tried to fix the issue:1. Recompiled the stored procedure2. Created a new, but identical stored procedure3. Created the stored procedure with the RECOMPILE option4. Created the stored procedure with a hard-coded value instead ofaparameter5. Changed the stored procedure to use dynamic SQLIn every case, performance did not improve and the query plan remainedthe same (I could not easily confirm this with the dynamic SQLversion, but performance was still horrible).I am currently running UPDATE STATISTICS on all of the involvedtables, but that will take awhile.Any ideas?Thanks!-Tom.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jul 16, 2007
Hi,We are trying to solve a real puzzle. We have a stored procedure thatexhibits *drastically* different execution times depending on how itsexecuted.When run from QA, it can take as little as 3 seconds. When it iscalled from an Excel vba application, it can take up to 180 seconds.Although, at other times, it can take as little as 20 seconds fromExcel.Here's a little background. The 180 second response time *usually*occurs after a data load into a table that is referenced by the storedprocedure.A check of DBCC show_statistics shows that the statistics DO getupdated after a large amount of data is loaded into the table.*** So, my first question is, does the updated statistics force arecompile of the stored procedure?Next, we checked syscacheobjects to see what was going on with theexecution plan for this stored procedure. What I expected to see wasONE execution plan for the stored procedure.This is not the case at all. What is happening is that TWO separateCOMPILED PLANs are being created, depending on whether the sp is runfrom QA or from Excel.In addition, there are several EXECUTABLE PLANs that correspond to thetwo COMPILED PLANs. Depending on *where* the sp is run, the usecountincreases for the various EXECUTABLE PLANS.To me, this does not make any sense! Why are there *multiple* compileand executable plans for the SAME sp?One theory we have is, that we need to call the sp with the dboqualifier, ie) EXEC dbo.spHas anyone seen this? I just want to get to the bottom of this andfind out why sometimes the query takes 180 seconds and other timesonly takes 3 seconds!!Please help.Thanks much
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2008
Has anyone encountered cases in which a proc executed by DTS has the following behavior:
1) underperforms the same proc when executed in DTS as opposed to SQL Server Managemet Studio
2) underperforms an ad-hoc version of the same query (UPDATE) executed in SQL Server Managemet Studio
What could explain this?
Obviously,
All three scenarios are executed against the same database and hit the exact same tables and indices.
Query plans show that one step, a Clustered Index Seek, consumes most of the resources (57%) and for that the estimated rows = 1 and actual rows is 10 of 1000's time higher. (~ 23000).
The DTS execution effectively never finishes even after many hours (10+)
The Stored procedure execution will finish in 6 minutes (executed after the update ad-hoc query)
The Update ad-hoc query will finish in 2 minutes
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2002
HI,
I have an interesting situation. I have created a stored procedure which has a select union query and it accepts some parameters. When I execute this procedure it takes 8 minutes. When I copy the script in stored procedure and run it directly in Query Analyzer it takes 2 1/2 minutes?? Same numbers of rows are returned either way in the result set with about 13,000.
I cannot figure this out and it is almost the same thing except that in Query Analyzer I declare the parameters variables and its values?
Any feedback would be appreciated!
Thanks in advance...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 17, 2015
Is it possible to check query execution plan of a store procedure from create script (before creating it)?
Basically the developers want to know how a newly developed procedure will perform in production environment. Now, I don't want to create it in production for just checking the execution plan. However they've provided SQL script for the procedure. Now wondering is there any way to look at the execution plan for this procedure from the script provided?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Dec 7, 2005
Hi I am slowly getting to grips with SQL Server. As a part of this, I have been attempting to work on producing more efficient queries. This post is regarding what appears to be a discrepancy between the SQL Server execution plan and the actual time taken by a query to run. My brief is to produce an attendance system for an education establishment (I presume you know I'm not an A-Level student completing a project :p ). Circa 1.5m rows per annum, testing with ~3m rows currently. College_Year could strictly be inferred from the AttDateTime however it is included as a field because it a part of just about every PK this table is ever likely to be linked to. Indexes are not fully optimised yet. Table:CREATE TABLE [dbo].[AttendanceDets] ([College_Year] [smallint] NOT NULL ,[Group_Code] [char] (12) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL ,[Student_ID] [char] (8) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL ,[Session_Date] [datetime] NOT NULL ,[Start_Time] [datetime] NOT NULL ,[Att_Code] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL ) ON [PRIMARY]GO CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX [IX_AltPK_Clust_AttendanceDets] ON [dbo].[AttendanceDets]([College_Year], [Group_Code], [Student_ID], [Session_Date], [Att_Code]) ON [PRIMARY]GO CREATE INDEX [All] ON [dbo].[AttendanceDets]([College_Year], [Group_Code], [Student_ID], [Session_Date], [Start_Time], [Att_Code]) ON [PRIMARY]GO CREATE INDEX [IX_AttendanceDets] ON [dbo].[AttendanceDets]([Att_Code]) ON [PRIMARY]GOALL inserts are via an overnight sproc - data comes from a third party system. Group_Code is 12 chars (no more no less), student_ID 8 chars (no more no less). I have created a simple sproc. I am using this as a benchmark against which I am testing my options. I appreciate that this sproc is an inefficient jack of all trades - it has been designed as such so I can compare its performance to more specific sprocs and possibly some dynamic SQL. Sproc:CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[CAMsp_Att] @College_Year AS SmallInt,@Student_ID AS VarChar(8) = '________', @Group_Code AS VarChar(12) = '____________', @Start_Date AS DateTime = '1950/01/01', @End_Date as DateTime = '2020/01/01', @Att_Code AS VarChar(1) = '_' AS IF @Start_Date = '1950/01/01'SET @Start_Date = CAST(CAST(@College_Year AS Char(4)) + '/08/31' AS DateTime) IF @End_Date = '2020/01/01'SET @End_Date = CAST(CAST(@College_Year +1 AS Char(4)) + '/07/31' AS DateTime) SELECT College_Year, Group_Code, Student_ID, Session_Date, Start_Time, Att_Code FROM dbo.AttendanceDets WHERE College_Year = @College_YearAND Group_Code LIKE @Group_CodeAND Student_ID LIKE @Student_IDAND Session_Date <= @End_DateAND Session_Date >=@Start_DateAND Att_Code LIKE @Att_CodeGOMy confusion lies with running the below script with Show Execution Plan:--SET SHOWPLAN_TEXT ON--Go DECLARE @Time as DateTime Set @Time = GetDate() select College_Year, group_code, Student_ID, Session_Date, Start_Time, Att_Code from attendanceDetswhere College_Year = 2005 AND group_code LIKE '____________' AND Student_ID LIKE '________'AND Session_Date <= '2005-11-16' AND Session_Date >= '2005-11-16' AND Att_Code LIKE '_' Print 'First query took: ' + CAST(DATEDIFF(ms, @Time, GETDATE()) AS VarCHar(5)) + ' milli-Seconds' Set @Time = GetDate() EXEC CAMsp_Att @College_Year = 2005, @Start_Date = '2005-11-16', @End_Date = '2005-11-16' Print 'Second query took: ' + CAST(DATEDIFF(ms, @Time, GETDATE()) AS VarCHar(5)) + ' milli-Seconds'GO --SET SHOWPLAN_TEXT OFF--GOThe execution plan for the first query appears miles more costly than the sproc yet it is effectively the same query with no parameters. However, my understanding is the cached plan substitutes literals for parameters anyway. In any case - the first query cost is listed as 99.52% of the batch, the sproc 0.48% (comparing the IO, cpu costs etc support this). BUT the text output is:(10639 row(s) affected) First query took: 596 milli-Seconds (10639 row(s) affected) Second query took: 2856 milli-SecondsI appreciate that logical and physical performance are not one and the same but can why is there such a huge discrepancy between the two? They are tested on a dedicated test server, and repeated running and switching the order of the queries elicits the same results. Sample data can be provided if requested but I assumed it would not shed much light. BTW - I know that additional indexes can bring the plans and execution time closer together - my question is more about the concept. If you've made it this far - many thanks.If you can enlighten me - infinite thanks.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2015
When viewing an estimated query plan for a stored procedure with multiple query statements, two things stand out to me and I wanted to get confirmation if I'm correct.
1. Under <ParameterList><ColumnReference... does the xml attribute "ParameterCompiledValue" represent the value used when the query plan was generated?
<ParameterList>
<ColumnReference Column="@Measure" ParameterCompiledValue="'all'" />
</ParameterList>
</QueryPlan>
</StmtSimple>
2. Does each query statement that makes up the execution plan for the stored procedure have it's own execution plan? And meaning the stored procedure is made up of multiple query plans that could have been generated at a different time to another part of that stored procedure?
View 0 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2007
Hello :
How to execute a procedure stored during execution of the report, that is before the poster the data.
Thnak you.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 16, 2001
I have two schematically identical databases on the same MS SQL 2000 server. The differences in the data are very slight. Here is my problem: the identical query has totally different execution plans on the different databases. One is (in my opinion) correct, the other causes the query to take 60 times as long. This is not an exaggeration, on the quick DB the query takes 3 seconds, on the other DB it takes 3 minutes. I have tried the following to help the optimizer pick a better execution plan on the slow db:
rebuild the indexes
dbcc indexdefrag
update statistics
I CAN put in a hint to cause the query to execute faster, but my employer now knows about the problem and he (and I) want to know WHY this is happening.
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks.
-Scott
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
HiCan you give me sone pointers to where I can get more information aboutthe various operations like index seeks,Bookmark Lookups,ClusteredIndex Scan in an execution plan.ThanksRagu
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2008
Hi Gurus,
What permissio0ns one should have to view execution plans on SQL SERVER 2005.
Thanks,
ServerTeam
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
I'm looking for assistance on a problem with SQL Server. We have adatabase where a particular query returns about 3000 rows. This querytakes about 2 minutes on most machines, which is fine in thissituation. But on another machine (just one machine), it can run forover 30 minutes and not return. I ran it in Query Analyzer and it wasreturning about 70 rows every 45-90 seconds, which is completelyunacceptable.(I'm a developer, not a DBA, so bear with me here.)I ran an estimated execution plan for this database on each machine,and the "good" one contains lots of parallelism stuff, in particularthe third box in from the left. The "bad" one contains a "Nested Loop"at that position, and NO parallelism.We don't know exactly when this started happening, but we DO know thatsome security updates have been installed on this machine (it's at theclient location), and also SP1 for Office 2003.So it looks like parallelism has been turned off by one of these fixes.Where do we look for how to turn it back on? This is on SQL Server2000 SP3.Thanks for any help you might have for me!Christine Wolak -- SPL WorldGroup --Join Bytes!
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2007
Hi all,
I have a table TableA with few million rows. When I query TableA , the execution plans changes based on the input parameter as shown below . Why this happens ? How to resolve this ? Any inputs would be appreciated.
SELECT * FROM TableA WHERE Column1 = 1 => SELECT -> Clustered Index Scan (100%)
SELECT * FROM TableA WHERE Column1 = 2 => SELECT -> Clustered Index Scan (100%)
SELECT * FROM TableA WHERE Column1 = 3 => SELECT -> Parallelism (3%) -> Clustered Index Scan (97%)
SELECT * FROM TableA WHERE Column1 = 4 => SELECT -> Nested Loops -> Index Seek (50%) -> Clustered Index Seek (50%)
(takes a very long time to retrieve the records)
Thanks in advance,
DBLearner.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 21, 2006
Does SQLCE 3 cache execution plans? Or even make use of them?
Thanks
Tryst
View 7 Replies
View Related
Dec 16, 2004
Pls tell me where i will be able to find a good material on interpreting the Execution plans................how do i compare 2 diff plans for Quries written in 2 diff ways...giving same output
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 2004
In using ADO to connect to SQL Server, I'm trying to retrieve multiple datasets AND statistics that are usually returned via the OnInfoMessage event. For those that are familiar with SQL Server, I need the results returned by the SET STATISTICS IO ON and SET STATISTICS PROFILE ON options. Anyone had any luck doing this before?
Thanks in advance.
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2008
I've been working with SQL Server 2005 for a while now and I've noticed some odd behavior that I want to bounce of other members of the community. I should preface that I've been a forum viewer (and occasional contributer) here at SQL Team for a while and I've naturally developed a keen sense for optimizations.
Fundamentally, longer stored procedures with perfectly fine/optimized execution plans are inconsistent with real world performance. In some of these cases, a low subtree cost on a 4 core machine with 16gb of ram and 2 15 drive SAS arrays with little load takes excessively long to run or in some cases doesn't complete.
This isn't due to blocking or resource bottlenecks as I'm quite familiar with built in tools to troubleshoot and resolve those issues. In all cases, I am able to rearchitect the stored procedure into a higher subtree cost variant and get reasonable performance, but it's frustrating to have to redo work and there seems to be no common theme other than longer multi-statement procedures.
I've used SQL Server 2000 extensively and did not notice this level of inconsistency in performance with that product version. Just wondering if others in the community have experiences similar or if I'm just crazy.
Thanks for reading my rant.
- Shane
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Hi there - hoping someone can help me here!I have a database that has been underperforming on a number of queriesrecently - in a test environment they take only a few seconds, but onthe live data they take up to a minute or so to run. This is using thesame data.Every evening a copy of the live data is copied to a backup 'snapshot'database on the same server and also, on this copy the queries onlytake a second or so to run. (This is testing through the QueryAnalyser)I've studied the execution plans for the same query on the snapshot dband the live db and they seem to be significantly different - why isthis? it's looking at the same data and exactly the same code!!Anybody got any ideas???
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 6, 2015
SQL Server 2012 Performance Dashboard Main advices me this:
Since the application is from a vendor and I have no control over its code, how can improve this sitation?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 18, 2007
hi
how can i execute the stored procedure statements in asp with c#.net ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 29, 2000
Is there a way that a stored procedure (or a SQL script) can be forced to execute
when a user logs on?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 6, 2000
1) Is it possible to run stored procedures at specified intervals without
using the job system (through T-SQL)? I want the schedule to be
independent of the MSDB database in case of temporary failures, etc.
2) Would extended stored procedures be helpful in this scenario?
Thanks
ziggy
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2005
i have a stored procedure that builds a dynamic insert statement & inserts data into a table. Now when I execute the
sp manually with a 'exec sptest parm1,parm2', it runs fine & inserts the data in the table. But when this sp is called from within a .net application,it prepares the insert statement but does not actually insert the record in the table. It comes back with a RPC: Completed so it seems like it completed but it does not insert the record in the table. Also just after the RPC:Completed, it throws an ATTENTION with nothing in the text data. I am confused on whats going on here. The definition of ATtention
in the event class implies that the query has been cancelled or it timed out. But we have no timeout on the sql server side. The application developer says there is no timeout on the application side (i dont totally believe that). so what else could
cause that Attention? There is nothing in the error log as well. Also why does the trace come back with a RPC:Completed when the stored procedure did NOT insert any data? Does the RPC:Complete only mean that the RPC completed - irrespective of success or failure? If the sp failed or had an error will it still come back with a rpc:completed?
Any thoughts are appreciated...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2007
hi
i want to know the execution status of a stored procedure . That is i want to know whether the stored procedure was executed succesfully or not.If not i want to get the error message
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2004
I am looking for a way to count the number of times a stored procedure on the database has been executed over let's say over a period of time(month, years, etc).
Is there a system stored procedure or a system table that stores that information.
I am struggling to find some information about this topic
Thanks for the help
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 2, 2005
Hi. When SqlServer executes a procedure (any type: select, update, insert) after it´s executed can I get a default status for this executed procedure, like a return bool value from SqlServer as true for successfull and false for failed to execute?
»»» Ken.A
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Hi,There is a stored procedure which runs through job.It is calling to other stored procedure and other stored procedures arecalling to another .. so on (approx 12-15 sp in batch)Problem:Sometime it does not execute properly. (approx very rare... once in 500execution or sometime on new site/database)I want to know the reason for it.If anybody have faced the similar problem.Please tell the possible causes and possible solutions.Thanks in Adv.T.S.Negi(MIND)
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2006
hi guys
I am having problems running a stored procedure where i am using two input parameters
my stored procedure is as follows
ALTER procedure [dbo].[enterdhbnameDhbService]
(
@dhb_service char, @dhbname char
)
as
SELECT dbo.DHBMappingTable.[DHB Name], dbo.Agency.DHB_service, dbo.PurchaseUnitMappingTable.PU,
SUM(dbo.[NMDS Data for IDF Report].[Number of caseweighted discharges]) AS Expr1, dbo.AdmissionMappingTable.Admission
FROM dbo.DomicileCodes INNER JOIN
dbo.[NMDS Data for IDF Report] ON dbo.DomicileCodes.[Domicile code] = dbo.[NMDS Data for IDF Report].[Domicile Code] INNER JOIN
dbo.PurchaseUnitMappingTable ON dbo.[NMDS Data for IDF Report].[Purchase Unit] = dbo.PurchaseUnitMappingTable.PU INNER JOIN
dbo.AdmissionMappingTable ON
dbo.[NMDS Data for IDF Report].[Admission Type Description] = dbo.AdmissionMappingTable.[Admission Type Description] INNER JOIN
dbo.Agency ON dbo.[NMDS Data for IDF Report].[Agency Name] = dbo.Agency.Agengy INNER JOIN
dbo.DHBMappingTable ON dbo.DomicileCodes.[DHB area] = dbo.DHBMappingTable.[DHB Code]
WHERE (dbo.[NMDS Data for IDF Report].[Financial Year] = '20062007')
GROUP BY dbo.DHBMappingTable.[DHB Name], dbo.Agency.DHB_service, dbo.PurchaseUnitMappingTable.PU, dbo.AdmissionMappingTable.Admission
HAVING (dbo.Agency.DHB_service = @dhb_service) and
AND (dbo.DHBMappingTable.[DHB Name] = @dhbname )
The values of " @dhb_service" and "@dhbname" need to be entered when the stored procedure is executed. Now when I execute the stored procedure through the following statement:
exec enterdhbnameDhbService
@dhb_service = 'canterbury' ,@dhbname = 'south canterbury'
SQL does not give me any results, only empty table gets displayed. I have checked the combination.. This combination does exist in my table
pls help guys
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 17, 2007
Hi,
I created the an assembly and stored procedure using the following steps:
sp_configure 'clr enabled', 1
GO
RECONFIGURE
GO
alter database TEST set trustworthy on
CREATE ASSEMBLY ClrWebServices
FROM 'D:Dataclr_4.dll'
WITH PERMISSION_SET = UNSAFE;
GO
CREATE ASSEMBLY [ClrWebServices.XmlSerializers]
FROM 'D:Dataclr_4.XmlSerializers.dll'
WITH PERMISSION_SET = SAFE;
GO
CREATE PROCEDURE InsertLocation(@city nvarchar(200),
@state nvarchar(200), @country nvarchar(200))
AS
EXTERNAL NAME ClrWebServices.StoredProcedures.clr_4
GO
After this when i am trying to execute the procedure InsertLocation
EXEC InsertLocation 'Sarasota','Florida','USA'
I am getting the following exception..
Msg 6522, Level 16, State 1, Procedure InsertLocation, Line 0
A .NET Framework error occurred during execution of user-defined routine or aggregate "InsertLocation":
System.Net.WebException: Unable to connect to the remote server ---> System.Net.Sockets.SocketException: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it
System.Net.Sockets.SocketException:
at System.Net.Sockets.Socket.DoConnect(EndPoint endPointSnapshot, SocketAddress socketAddress)
at System.Net.Sockets.Socket.InternalConnect(EndPoint remoteEP)
at System.Net.ServicePoint.ConnectSocketInternal(Boolean connectFailure, Socket s4, Socket s6, Socket& socket, IPAddress& address, ConnectSocketState state, IAsyncResult asyncResult, Int32 timeout, Exception& exception)
System.Net.WebException:
at System.Net.HttpWebRequest.GetRequestStream()
at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol.Invoke(String methodName, Object[] parameters)
at ClrWebServices.Test.TerraService.GetPlaceFacts(Place place)
at StoredProcedures.GetLocationImage(SqlString city, SqlString state, SqlString country)
at StoredProcedures.clr_4(SqlString city, SqlString state, SqlString country)
I searched in the google and found one answer in http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=76222&SiteID=1 suggesting use
ALTER ASSEMBLY ClrWebServices WITH PERMISSION_SET=EXTERNAL_ACCESS
when i executed i got the exception
Msg 6213, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
ALTER ASSEMBLY failed because method "add_ConvertLonLatPtToNearestPlaceCompleted" on type "ClrWebServices.Test.TerraService" in external_access assembly "clr_4" has a synchronized attribute. Explicit synchronization is not allowed in external_access assemblies.
Can any body help on this?
Thanks in advance....
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 29, 2007
Hello,
I have a big problem with slow execution of stored procedure in SQL Server 2005 but I really don't understand the reason. I have a database with large table (about 400 million rows) and simple stored procedure to get data from that table (one select statement to select time and value columns).
Strange thing is that if I call that stored procedure from .net application (native SqlDataProvider) it takes about 6 seconds to execute but if I call the same procedure with the same parameters from within SQL Server Management Studio it takes only 25 milliseconds to execute!
I've noticed that from .net, procedure is called with binary data and in Management Studio sql script is executed so I've copied/pasted the script from Management Studio to .net code and again the same thing happens (6 seconds from .net and 25ms from Management Studio). I traced executions with SQL Profiler and everything seems to be identical for both applications except it takes much longer time for .net application.
Both SQL Server Management Studio and .net application are on the same machine and SQL Server is on another.
This is the query that when executed in Management Studio takes 25ms:
EXEC [dbo].[GetRawData] @pcu = N'DV_ZERJ_HEV1',@tag = N'MJERENO',@from = N'20070629 07:00:00',@to = N'20070629 08:00:00'
This is the same query in .net application code that takes 6 seconds to execute:
sqlCommand = new SqlCommand("EXEC [dbo].[GetRawData] @pcu = N'DV_ZERJ_HEV1',@tag = N'MJERENO',@from = N'20070629 07:00:00',@to = N'20070629 08:00:00'",sqlConnection);
sqlReader = sqlCommand.ExecuteReader();
At first I thought that Management Studio somehow caches results but if I change parameters of stored procedure it always takes less than 30ms to execute.
I really don't understand this. Please, help!
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2015
I want to simulate 100 users simultaneously executing a procedure in sql server (best example would be 100 users using one report with different parameters in ssrs at the same time ). can i do that ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2008
Hi all,I have a problem with a stored procedure.This stored procedure inserts around bout 500,000 records but when it is executed it takes about 15-16 hours to do so.The stored procedure is using a temporary table to do this and is also calling a function.Please let me know if there is a way to reduce the execution time.will a cursor help?
Thanks,
Anne.
View 19 Replies
View Related
